FCoE Multihop EMC VNX 5300 to Cisco UCS FI / Series Blade B

Similar Questions

• Problem of sync of folder offline EMC VNX 5300 and Window7

  We have an EMC VNX 5300 and we use it as our NAS storage. Everything works ok we seem to be problems with folders offline synchronization of files ok but when we delete the file in the folder it seems to remove it, but in fact it leaves orphaned. Someone has seen this. Help!

  Hello

  I suggest you to contact the team of EMC support for assistance. They should be able to help you.

  See the link.

  https://community.EMC.com/welcome

• VNX 5300 file shared storage - connect to Cisco UCS 6200 interconnection fabric

  Hello

  I'm designing a calculation and Shared Storage solution to help

  • EMC VNX 5300 shared storage
    • Block
    • File - sharing two Data Mover with i/o 10GE ports
  • Cisco UCS Blade Server Platform
    • Interconnection of Cisco UCS 6248 fabric
    • Chassis Cisco UCS 5108

  I have a question about where the connection Data movers with i/o 10GE ports. I connected to the 6248 UCS Cisco fabric interconnections or connect them to the switch IP network?

  kind is ok.

• Compatibiltiy cables Twinax Cisco with EMC VNX/e

  Hello

  I would like to know about Cisco Twinax cables Compatibiltiy storage EMC VNX/e - connectivity between UCS fabric Interconnect and EMC VNX/e.

  The Twinax cables of Cisco to address following are compatible with EMC VNX and e series platforms:

  • SFP-H10GB-CU1M = 1 m 10 G SFP + Twinax cable assembled, passive
  • SFP-H10GB-CU3M = 3 m 10 G SFP + Twinax cable assembled, passive
  • SFP-H10GB-CU5M = 5 m 10 G SFP + Twinax cable assembled, passive
  • SFP-H10GB-ACU7M = 7 m 10 G SFP + Twinax assembled cable, active
  • SFP-H10GB-ACU10M = 10 m 10 G SFP + Twinax assembled cable, active

  Kindly advice. Thank you.

  From what I've seen on the EMC forums, Active cables are supported, passive are not.

• Cisco UCS components and software bug

  I was reading on the Cisco products affected by the vulnerability of software to the following Cisco Security Council

  http://Tools.Cisco.com/Security/Center/content/CiscoSecurityAdvisory/CIS...

  I couldn't find if below products/components are affected by this problem... can someone confirm if these products/components are vulnerable to the software?

  Cisco UCS Manager

  Integrated management of Cisco (CIMC) controller

  Cisco UCS blade chassis

  TIA

  I agree that sentence is a bit off, note that the view talking affected _products_ (or not), not specific _components_ of a product.

  UCS seems to be off the hook. Not affected are:

  • Cisco UCS series B (blade) servers
  • Cisco UCS C-Series (Stand alone Rack) servers
  • Cisco UCS Central
  • Cisco UCS fabric of interconnections
  • Systems Cisco UCS Invicta series Solid State

  MMIC and UCSM would be part of the FI or B-or-C-series, etc.

• Mellanox for Cisco UCS RDMA support.

  Hello

  I wonder if anyone can help or tell me if there is interconnection support RDMA Mellanox and Cisco UCS B series or fabric. It is possible to connect on the technical level.

  I have clients who have Cisco UCS B Series more Windows 2012 R2 HyperV installed, who now want to connect RDMA Mellanox storage medium

  Hi murielle

  Important caveat: RoCE means RDMA over converged Ethernet.

  If you look at the YouTube mentioned above, you will see, that SMB Server and Client on the blades of the UCS; so no interop Situation. everything happens within a domain of UCS.

  In your situation, you have a comprehensive Converged Ethernet network (Cisco and Mellanox); your customers could be on the blades, the servers attached to the Mellanox switches.

  It is essentially a question Interop; I have no idea if it has been tested or not.

  Walter.

• Cisco UCS M81KR adapter is compatible with vSphere 5.5?

  Hello

  I can't find Cisco UCS M81KR adapter in the list of vSphere features 5.5 compatible hw. We vSphere 5.0 running on Cisco UCS B200 M2 blade with M81KR and are planning to upgrade to vSphere 5.5.

  Advice and suggestions will be greatly appreciated...

  Thank you!

  Hello

  It is supported by VMware HCL

  http://www.vmware.com/resources/compatibility/detail.php?deviceCategory=io&productid=10472&deviceCategory=io&keyword=m81&vioSolutions=Standard - IO devices & page = 1 & display_interval = 10 & sortColumn = partner & sortOrder = Asc

  Kind regards.

  Fred

• FCoE Multihop

  Hi all

  I am fairly new to the world of storage and now I'm working on the FCoE multihop test laboratory. I have a few questions that need to be clarified and some examples of caonfiguration that need to be corrected. I've also attached the logical topology for my lab. Here is the information on my topology:

  • Blue = line ethernet
  • Red line = CF
  • Green = line FCoE
  • 2xN5K with NXOS v5.xx
  • 1xFI 6120 with UCSM v2.1
  • NetApp FAS2200
  • I activated fcoe and npiv pn my 2xN5K function

  What I want to do done VSAN (VSAN 360 and 361 VSAN) NetApp 2 and connect it to CF link to my 2xN5K as FC and then continue downstream, it my FI and UCS blade via link FCoE. Here are some questions I want to ask questions on:

  1. From what I read, we must separate FCoE traffic ethernet traffic in this scenario, that's why I use 2 FCoE links separated beside 2 ethernet (on vPC configuration) link, from 2N5K to FI. Is this true?
  2. To activate the FCoE, we map the VLAN-VSAN, and from what I've read, there are separate VLANS for this VLAN mapping VSAN that carries the normal ethernet traffic. Is this true?
     NB: I have 2 VLAN on blade UCS (260 and 261) and for this FCoE connectivity, I create 2 VLAN more (360 and 361) map to VSAN 360 and 361.
  3. This question have a link with #2--> from what I've read, the traffic of VLAN than carry FCoE traffic can not pass vPC link Peer, that's why I created different VLAN so that on vPC Peer link I can filter FCoE VLAN (VLAN 360 and 361). Is this true?
  4. By N5K links that are connected to the FI must be configured in F mode, what links that connect directly to NetApp (Interface type = CF)? On which mode is it?

  I think that's all for now, I hope that you guys can guide me in this world of storage. I await your response. Thanks in advance.

  Best regards

  IJE

  IJE Hello,

  (1) Yes, you must use the uplink dedicated for FCoE when you use vPC between FI and N5K. If you do use VPC (IE FI has <---->N5K-== directly via the mode), you can use rising unified (FCoE + LAN) on the same physical links.

  (2) Yes. You will use same ID VLAN-VSAN on FI and N5K to be part of the same fabric.

  (3) Yes, don't allow VLAN FCoE links counterparts vPC.

  (4) type port N5K connection FI and Netapp would be F

  Please refer to the following doc

  FCoE 5000 Nexus with attached FCoE UCS (Multi-Hop FCoE) Configuration example

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps9670/products_configuration_example09186a0080c13e92.shtml

  HTH

  Padma

• Dell TL4000 Tape Library on Cisco UCS 6120

  Hello

  We have Cisco UCS 5108 2 6120XP fabric of interconnection. We are running VMware on my Cisco blades. I have I need to connect my Dell TL 4000 LTO3 tape library this Cisco UCS so that I can configure a virtual machine with the EMC Networker software for backup of virtual machine data. When I connect the Cisco UCS library, it does not recoginize as tape drive.

  Please suggest how to set up the same.

  Thank you

  Amit,

  We do not support direct damage attach FC tape library to the FI currently.

  It may be a CF or CF storage end switch.

  . / Afonso

• Cisco UCS Direct Attached ISCSI Storage access upstream to storage array

  I'm doing my first installation of UCS with a chassis 5108) and (4) B200 M3 blade and (2) 6248 fabric interconnects. The plan is to connect our EMC VNX directly on the fabric of interconnections as the chassis will be the only system for access to the SAN, after migration from our current system. The fabric interconnects will be transmitted to (2) 4500-X switches configured in a vs.

  In my research of best practices and general deployment guidelines I noticed the need to create (2) separate iscsi VLANS for fabric and a fabric in B. I'm guessing that this requirement is the lack of STP as YEW is configured in EHM, but I was not able to find an exact answer. Any idea would be appreciated.

  My main question and my concern is that if I create a second VLAN ISCSI on our X 4500 and then create both of these VIRTUAL on FI networks A & B I'll be able to connect the SAN to the UCS as well as our former VMware cluster (we are migrating our system HP Compute and storage UCS 5.5 environment) in order to facilitate the vMotions of storage?

  I noticed the need for iscsi separated (2) VLAN a fabric and a fabric B

  Are you referring to

  https://www.EMC.com/collateral/hardware/technical-documentation/h8229-VN...

  p 36

  If I understand your question: can a host attached to 4500 (connected to the UCS FI), access LUNS on the VNX, which is directly connected to the UCS fabric interconnect through lanes (EHM FI) material? YES! I would accept this for a migration, but not forever, because it means that traffic on the fabric of interconnection.

• Good plugin for EMC VNX VAAI?

  Dear all,

  We organize 6 ESXi 5.0 update 1 bunches with 2 boxes of EMC VNX 5500 for iSCSI (only using block, no file) connections. I was wandering if we use the correct VAAI plugin.

  ~ list of modules system # esxcli | grep ' Name\ |-\|vaai'

  Name is charged is enabled
  ------------------- --------- ----------
  true true vaai_filter
  true true vmw_vaaip_emc
  true true vmw_vaaip_cx
  ~ #

  
  ~ # esxcli central storage peripheral vaai situation get

  NAA.600601601c002f00422ca2d160aee111
  VAAI name of the Plugin: VMW_VAAIP_CX
  ATS status: supported
  Clone status: supported
  Zero status: supported
  Delete status: unsupported

  VMW_VAAIP_CX the plugin VAAI is correct for VNX or only CLARiiON?

  If not, how can we load the right pair?

  Thanks in advance,

  Olivier

  This is part of the VAAI.  You need to exploit functionality VAAI, time specific to the vendor for each device a filter of PSA device and a plugin VAAI. VMware provides a unique device called VAAI_FILTERPSA filter plugin. If a device supports unloading of VAAI, it is first claimed by the VAAI VAAI_FILTERfilter. Once claimed by the filter, a plugin vendor-specific VAAI will ask and then manage your device.  In this case, the specific plugin of the seller is vmw_vaaip_emc. It is also provided by VMware.

  You only need to add VAAI software in the case of NAS storage arrays - table seller gives it. In the case of the bays of block storage (iSCSI, FC, FCoE), the software already comes with the ESXi host.

  HTH

  Cormac

• Cisco UCS

  Still someone deployed Cisco UCS with vSphere. It's an interesteding offering that seems to take blades to a whole new level. Some of the interesting aspects include:

  Hardware virtualization

  Memory - can use 192 or 384 GB of memory per Blade model

  Wiring - use about half of the normal wiring

  CPU - CPU density is much greater than the current blades.

  Integration with other Cisco devices. Call Manager and integrity are now options for virtualization.

  A single pane of glass management. This can be managed in Virtual Center.

  E/S. With Fibre Channel over Ethernet (FCoE) and a significant improvement of the CNA inputs and outputs.

  I'm looking to see what kind of gotcha people have met others and cost. Upgrades were necessary SAN or any other

  the hidden costs or requirements?

  Mike

  Well, it is a wonderful solution and works very well!

  as long as you have a switch for the CF that supports the NPV (like MDS), then you will have your SAN ready!

  Jose Ruelas B

  http://aservir.WordPress.com

• Switch N4032F and connectivity EMC VNX 5400

  Currently have R720 Dell servers connected to N4032F with Dell twinax cables and

  Reference Dell EqualLogic SAN 6210 connected to N4032F with Dell twinax cables.

  Want to connect EMC VNX 5400 (a ports SFP + with the fiber GBIC)

  Can I remove the EMC VNX IGBC and connect it to the Twinax cables or what I put GBIC in N4032F and connect them with fiber?

  Or do I need something else? EMC asked if Dell stuff not active/active on their ports?

  A Finisar FTLX8571D3BNL works for the N4032F Dell connection to an EMC VNX or Data Domain

• vFoglight with Cisco UCS

  Hello all,.
  We are looking for Cisco UCS for our ESX env. and I was wondering if someone was running vFoglight UCS and had problems.
  Or if someone of Quest/Vizioncore knows of any problem or future integration planned with UCS.

  Thank you
  Craig Dieck

  Craig, I know of many clients running the Cisco USC with VMware and they are very happy. There is no known issue with vFoglight perspective. VFoglight hardware monitoring currently able to extract any platform SNMP information. If you are looking for a vFoglgith to pull information from the physical ESX servers directly (not SNMP) you will need to ask for a discussion of the roadmap with your representative local of the quest.

  Inform the product manager for the platform you are using and what you want to be monitored and displayed...

• Cisco UCS B200 M4Compatible with 2100 FEX in UCS 5108 chassis &amp; FI 6100?

  Hello

  The blade server Cisco UCS B200 M4 is compatible with FEX 2100 within a Cisco UCS 5108 chassis & Cisco UCS 6100 fabric of interconnection?

  The interop tool said clearly for the B200-M4:

  http://www.Cisco.com/Web/TechDoc/UCS/interoperability/matrix/matrix.html

  Note 14: The 2104XP fabric Extender is not compatible when the 1240 and 1280 or 1240 and VIC Port Expander are combined on the same blade. Applies to the M3 and M3 B200 as well as B420 B22 with 1240 and the 2 adapter connector populated

  or for the VIC 1340

  Note 38: 6100 series fabric interconnects and 2100 series fabric Extender is not supported