FDMEE 11.1.2.4 - location of security groups

Similar Questions

• Add vNIC PortGroup scope with the REST API security group

  I created a security group within the reach of a PortGroup via the REST API. Now, I'm trying to add a vNIC, also via the REST API.

  To help illustrate, I have a JMTest1 VM with 1 vNIC connected to the PortGroup which is the scope of the security group. When I change this group the first item in the list that could be added to the security group is the first (and only) JMTest1 vNIC.

  

  To add it via the REST API, I need to provide the following:

  https://192.168.x.x/API/2.0/services/SecurityGroup/SecurityGroup-XX/members/ < member-moref >

  for example I need to understand what the < member-moref > for the vNIC to JMTest1 and this is what I have a problem with.

  If I add the vNIC through the user interface and then interrogate the security group it gives me below the answer:

  < securitygroup >

  < objectIdobjectId > securitygroup-xx < / objectId >

  < type >

  < typeName > SecurityGroup < / typeName >

  < / type >

  < name > JMTest7 < / name >

  < description / >

  < revision > 9 < / revision >

  < objectTypeName > SecurityGroup < / objectTypeName >

  < scope >

  < id > dvportgroup-xxxxx / < ID >

  < objectTypeName > DistributedVirtualPortgroup < / objectTypeName >

  < name > dv-xxxxx < / name >

  < / scope >

  < extendedAttributes / >

  < inheritanceAllowed > false < / inheritanceAllowed >

  < member >

  500758f6-b97b - 7A 79 - 0c < objectId > 04 - 996f53edf3f0.000 < / objectId >

  < type >

  Vnic < typeName > < / typeName >

  < / type >

  < name > JMTest1 - NIC 1 < / name >

  < revision > 6 < / revision >

  < objectTypeName > Vnic < / objectTypeName >

  < scope >

  < id > vm-xxxxx / < ID >

  < objectTypeName > VirtualMachine < / objectTypeName >

  < name > JMTest1 < / name >

  < / scope >

  < extendedAttributes / >

  < / member >

  < / securitygroup >

  It seems that the < member-moref > for the JMTest1 vNIC is < objectId > 500758f6-b97b - a 7, 79 - 0c 04 - 996f53edf3f0.000 < / objectId >

  If I run now:

  https://192.168.x.x/API/2.0/services/SecurityGroup/SecurityGroup-XX/members/500758f6-b97b-7a79-0c04-996f53edf3f0.000

  then the vNIC is successfully added to the security group. (yay!) So I am now left with the task of how to get

  500758f6-b97b - 7A 79 - 0c < objectId > 04 - 996f53edf3f0.000 < / objectId >

  of a vNIC?

  I have looked at the object in the Mob vCenter and via PowerCLI, but cannot see how to derive from it.

  Anyone know the answer to that?

  The uuid vnic is created by concatenating the vm instanceUuid + '. ' + the last three digits of the vnic device key.  (The vnic is located in the area of the config.hardware.device of the virtual machine and the key will be to shape 4xxx, where xxx represents the 3 numbers you need).

• How to add the AD security group in each virtual machine with a name corresponding in VCenter?

  Hi all

  I would like to know if it is possible with VMware PowerCLI v4.1, I created the universal security group called 'Local administrators on %ComputerName%' for each server I have in UO computers by location OR separate and that he manually add members of the Local, but I want to attribute this security group in each computer virtual with the same name if possible.

  Basically, it's something like this:

  In the ad, here are computer objects:
  DOMAIN.com/Computers/ mailserver1-VM
  DOMAIN.com/Computers/ DBServer1-VM
  DOMAIN.com/Computers/ ApplicationServer1-VM

  In the ad's local security group objects:
  DOMAIN.com/SecureProductionOU/ 'Administrator locally on mailserver1-VM'
  DOMAIN.com/SecureProductionOU/ 'Local on DBServer1-VM administrator.
  DOMAIN.com/SecureProductionOU/ 'Local on ApplicationServer1-VM administrator.

  So I want to affect these security group in each respective name of VMS in VCenter:

  VCenter01.domain.com
  Datacenter1
  HighPerformanceCluster1
  Mailserver1-VM - Local Administrator on mailserver1-VM - role: read-only
  DBServer1-VM - Local Administrator on DBServer1-VM - role: read-only
  ApplicationServer1-VM - Local Administrator on ApplicationServer1-VM - role: read-only

  Any kind of aid and assistance would be appreciated grgeatly.

  Thank you.

  Hi Albert,

  I don't know what you want to check exactly, so I give 2 possible solutions.

  (1) you have a fixed number of names known to virtual machines for which you want to add this permission.

  $targetVM = "MailServer1-VM","DBServer1-VM","ApplicationServer1-VM"
  
  Get-Cluster -Name HighPerformanceCluster1 | Get-VM | `    where {$targetVM -contains $_.Name} | %{    New-VIPermission -Entity $_ -Principal ("DOMAIN\Local Administrator on " + $_.Name) `       -Role (Get-VIRole -Name ReadOnly) -Confirm:$false   }
  

  (2) you want to check for each virtual computer if the security group exist and then add the authorization.

  Get-Cluster -Name HighPerformanceCluster1 | Get-VM | `    Where{Get-QADObject ("DOMAIN\Local Administrator on " + $_.Name) `        -DontUseDefaultIncludedProperties -WarningAction SilentlyContinue `        -ErrorAction SilentlyContinue -SizeLimit 1} | %{    New-VIPermission -Entity $_ -Principal ("DOMAIN\Local Administrator on " + $_.Name) `        -Role (Get-VIRole -Name ReadOnly) -Confirm:$false} 
  

  Note that this requires the Quest AD snap-in must be installed. If you have a version without the Quest AD snap let me know.

• How to make an update of location to a group of photos at the same time?

  How to make an update of location to a group of photos at the same time?  This used to be a feature in iPhoto.

  I use El Capitan 10.11.6 and Photos 1.5

  If yu have OS X 10.5.1 s you say that you can not - with OS X 10.11.6 Photos 1.5 (a free update in the app store) you select them and info - enter the location and it will apply to all photos

  LN

• Remove the "Guest" user integrated security group "domain guests.

  We are running Windows Server 2008 R2 Standard.  I accidentally added the "Guest" user built into the 'Domain' security group invited and what you should now remove it to return the settings to how they were before.  However, everytime I try, I get the message...

  'The primary group cannot be removed.  Define another main group if you want to remove this one.'

  I had put the integrated group of "Guests" (including users 'Guests' integrated is a also a member of) to the primary group, however, the ability to set a primary group is grayed out.

  I hope someone has an idea?

  Thank you very much!

  Tim

  Post in the Windows Server Forums:
  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/category/WindowsServer/

• Creating security group with grants decided in active directory - Server 2003

  Hello

  I need to create several different security groups for about 7 users with grant different access rights, but all users will access the same folder main and some of the same void records. I created a group with some of the users but appear to have access to all the folders there particular subfolder but I only want to have access to some of the folders in the selected subfolder.

  I guess what I'm asking is how do I create groups of different security with grants decided for each groups and ensuring that users in these groups only have access and subsidies to certain folders.

  I don't know if I explained myself properly but I certainly confused myself, I hope someone can point me in the right direction to solve this problem.

  Thanks in advance

  Jah

  Jah,

  For assistance, please ask for help in the appropriate Microsoft TechNet Windows Server Forum.
  
  Thank you.

• Sync phone to PC Client/Server applications use what security group to access the files on PC Win 7

  Programs of client server that connects to the computer from a phone and store data on the PC as the synchronization programs have what user ID and are able to write to the disk by security group file permissions. Users authenticated Internet Explorer, system, administrators, customer ID current user appears on the phone and must be enabled (admin) and the password entered to connect.  If the customer is logged as administrator? How can there be two users with the same user id?  One by the PC and the other on the phone.  If the phone connects the PC as a user in this group what id permissions?

  Question 2: If I agree a technician to fix it to my PC and fix it, what is it connected as? and what group permissions is using?  How to protect against the connection later?

  Thank you

  This issue is beyond the scope of this site and must be placed on Technet or MSDN
  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/home
  http://social.msdn.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/home

• Cisco Unity Connection (CUC) - import LDAP user based on the security group and then assign a model

  Need to CUC automatically import users and assign a certain user or role model if they are added to a specific security group. (These are the help desk users).  Username admin accounts they will use to sign in CUC differs from that there windows account that is linked to their profile of voicemail.

  Current - now we must import new recruits and assign the correct model

  Want - when a user is added to a security group in AD, so when CUC doing his nightly sync, it automatically import user and assign a preconfigured for the account and all user model is automatic and I have never import it back these users.

  At the present time the course help desk users are already imported via LDAP and have the role that was.

  Suggestions?

  Not something that the UCA can do out of the box.

  The UCC does not offer, is to do the LDAP synchronization and once they are in CUC, to import, choose the model.

• The combination of several AD ACS 4.2 security groups

  Hello

  Our ACS is used for AAA for the wireless, the IOS CLI access and access to the unix server. For net admins and administrators unix, there are two levels, so indeed, we have 5 groups of individual devices that a user can be granted access.

  User groups are defined in Active Directory.

  I am looking for a way to combine information from several AD security groups to determine what a user can access. For example, a net administrator may or may not be a unix admin as well.

  Is it possible to do other than to have to have a large number of ad groups with one for each combination of authorization privileges?

  Thank you

  Luke

  HI Luke,.

  Definition of mapping of the hybrid is the best way to achieve this.

  Kind regards

  ~ JG

  Note the useful messages

• The opportunity to identify a specific storage for each user or security group.

  Hi all
  

  I asked how to specify storage for each user or security group on the server of the University Complutense of Madrid. ex. I want user 'weblogic' unable to download a document on the server of the University Complutense of Madrid, more than a gigabyte. the user can check in several files, but thetotal space for all files are not a gigabyte.

  Thank you
  

  I asked how to specify storage for each user or security group on the server of the University Complutense of Madrid. ex. I want user 'weblogic' unable to download a document on the server of the University Complutense of Madrid, more than a gigabyte. the user can check in several files and the total space for all files not exceeding a gigabyte.

  You can write a rule to achieve this where in the xStorageRule is evaluated based on any set of metadata such as dDocAuthor or dDocSecurityGroup etc., or a combination of metadata.

• A security group can be used as a reviewer?

  Hello

  A security group can be used as a (approvingly) examiner?

  Thank you

  Hello

  No, you can select individual users of Eloqua as examiners.

  edynamic expert Eloqua

• Access control and security group

  Hi all

  I need to know about the access control and what data are suitable for the security group and roles if I have the script like this:

  i. There are 2 different app namely ARA (96 branches with different types of reports) and TRACS400 (6 branches with different types of reports)

  II al ' ARA, users of Branch01 can NOT check Branch02.

  III. different report type is measured by Branch01 and Branch02 are different.

  IV. in Branch01, there are some reports are Read (Cannot download) only and some reports are read and write (downloadable).

  My questions are:

  1. from the above scenario, do I need create all the 96 security group and assign it to different leadership roles?

  2. How can I control read and write access, as I have tested the READ access the user is still able to download the report.

  3. How can I control to branch 01, report Type A is a read and report Type B read and write access?

  4. I noticed that if I use the account, the security group can be used be limited to 50 only security groups. Is this good? I may be an application later in the future. These 2 request for test only. But if I do not use the account, there are any number of security groups that can be used?

  Appreciate for your help.

  Hi aziela

  As mentioned by the friends of the forum, it is advisable to have the minimum security group given that its impact on the scalability of the application (rule). Accounts provide the best security solution of dimension view group.

  Security group corresponds to the role, role is mapped to the users. The permissions are obtained at the level of role-SG.

  Accounts are mapped directly to users. So you can have a precise control at the level of the user (eliminating the abstraction of the role).

  All these aspects are impacting performance where rule of thumb is mentioned in the documentation. In general, if a user belongs to many groups and accounts then it will take more time to process the request of content for this user.

  w.r.t. prohibiting the read-only users so that they will not be able to download content, there is a setting, please try option mentioned in this link http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E14571_01/doc.1111/e10792/e01_interface001.htm#CACCFHHA

  WRT performance calculation, see http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E14571_01/doc.1111/e10792/c03_security003.htm#CSMSP143

  Hope this helps

• Change security groups are allowed access to the project

  Hello

  We have a project of the Disqualification in our production environment that allows only administrators to view/access it. We now allow access of data analysts. I know that we could just edit the prod Manager access security group, but due to some storage issues related to the postgres DB that uses a Disqualification, we clearly downwards and the redeployment of the Disqualification (and the project) on the prod server every two weeks. This means having to manually modify access groups after each reinstall. To save the duty of our many stop to promote a new project dxi file, is there something that can be added to all config files to allow data analysts access the project? Editing a config in our backup file would be very fast and simple.

  See you soon

  Jon

  Unfortunately, no, no.

  I can't imagine a scenario that would require the Disqualification to redeploy completely. If there is a problem of PostgreSQL, the worst case would be a fall and recreate the Pb of results, I would have thought.

• Has anyone created new security groups... and how did you do

  We have problems with giving people the opportunity to view and modify other emails/forms/etc.   Anyone who sets up security to pull away, specifically, groups the possibility to remove or modify?  Not everyone who uses our system needs to change or remove, so I wasn't sure if someone had created security groups that pulls this ability of some specific users...

  Thank you!

  When I told our CSM, she said you have to contact support and they can do it on a case-by-case basis.  But we seek to implement the same thing, it would be interesting if you managed to get this Setup.

• NSX security group cannot get the address IP of VM

  Hi all

  I have a strange situation in my lab environment I create a security group consist of 2 virtual machines, but when I checked the addrsets, a single IP is in the list, here is the screenshot:

  

  It is supposed to be reported 2 IP: 192.168.0.34 and 192.168.0.38, but NSX only see a single IP address. Then I try to add another virtual machine with the IP 192.168.0.33, NSX can see two IP addresses:

  

  Seems the VM with IP 192.168.0.34 has a problem, but I don't know why the question isn't that arrived at this virtual machine, an idea how to solve it?

  Thank you very much

  ARO

  Davy

  What version are you running to NSX?

  Improve the detection of mechanisms have been since 6.2, that do not rely on VMware tools.