FETCH clause does not...

Similar Questions

• order by clause does not work in plsql cursor

  I have a sql that works well in sqlplus, but when I add it to a cursor in plsql, it doesn't. Also, I discovered that it works very well in plsql if I remove the order by clause.
  
  We cannot use "order by" clause in plsql?
  
  I have to explicitly use the name of the column to select the cause for which I ' order by '?
  
  Here is the work and not work code:
  
  -Works fine in sqlplus
  Select * from mgmt$ compliance_standard_rule where ((rule_iname comme '_SecRepRul %') OU))
  (substr(rule_iname,9) in ('AUDIT_SYS_OPS'))) and target_type = "oracle_database" order of rule_iname
  
  -Works fine in plsql
  CURSOR c_rule_guids_database () IS
  Select * from mgmt$ compliance_standard_rule where ((rule_iname comme '_SecRepRul %') OU))
  (substr(rule_iname,9) in ('AUDIT_SYS_OPS'))) and target_type = "oracle_database."
  );
  
  -Does not work in plsql: PL/SQL: ORA-00907: lack the right parenthesis
  CURSOR c_rule_guids_database () IS
  Select * from mgmt$ compliance_standard_rule where ((rule_iname comme '_SecRepRul %') OU))
  (substr(rule_iname,9) in ('AUDIT_SYS_OPS'))) and target_type = "oracle_database" order of rule_iname
  );
  
  Thanks for the help.

  Remove the parentheses around your return cursor:

  SQL> declare
    2      CURSOR c_rule_guids_database IS
    3      (select *
    4       from   compliance_standard_rule
    5       where ((rule_iname like '%_SecRepRul')
    6               OR
    7              (substr(rule_iname,9) in ('AUDIT_SYS_OPS'))
    8             )
    9       and   target_type = 'oracle_database'
   10       order by rule_iname
   11      );
   12  begin
   13     null;
   14  end;
   15  /
       order by rule_iname
       *
  ERROR at line 10:
  ORA-06550: line 10, column 6:
  PL/SQL: ORA-00907: missing right parenthesis
  ORA-06550: line 3, column 5:
  PL/SQL: SQL Statement ignored
  
  SQL> declare
    2      CURSOR c_rule_guids_database IS
    3       select *
    4       from   compliance_standard_rule
    5       where ((rule_iname like '%_SecRepRul')
    6               OR
    7              (substr(rule_iname,9) in ('AUDIT_SYS_OPS'))
    8             )
    9       and   target_type = 'oracle_database'
   10       order by rule_iname
   11       ;
   12  begin
   13     null;
   14  end;
   15  /
  
  PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
  

• WITH query Clause does not work in Oracle reports.

  Hi gurus,
  
  I use a query WITH clause and want to create a report by using the same query.
  
  But when I am trying to build a report, request gives error like "WITH clause table or view does not exist.
  
  But the same query works perfectly in line of sql.
  
  Does support the Oracle WITH clause query reports?
  
  Please suggest.
  
  
  Thank you
  Onkar

  I met a similar problem before and worked around it by moving the query to a pipeline function in the database as described in the unexpected CLAUSE causes ORA-00942 in Report Builder

  I hope this helps.

• Convert and To_Char in where clause does not

  Hello

  I try to get the following sql beating, but it always generates an error. Any ideas?

  SELECT

  e_Equipment.EQU_ID,

  e_Equipment.EQU_PC_name,

  e_Equipment.EQU_DESCR,

  e_Equipment.EQU_SERIAL_NO,

  e_Equipment.EQU_STATUS,

  a_POBSYSENUMS. PSS_ID

  Of e_equipment

  LEFT JOIN

  A_POBSYSENUMS

  ON e_Equipment.EQU_STATUS = CONVERT (A_POBSYSENUMS. PSS_ID, ' varchar (2)') AND A_POBSYSENUMS. PSS_PSE_PK = '76'

  WHERE

  e_Equipment.EQU_ORG_PK = 8271;

  Thank you very much

  Christina

  Looks like you are trying to use the MS SQL Server syntax rather than the Oracle syntax.

  You did not say why to_char does not work for you...

  Try...

  e_Equipment.EQU_STATUS = TO_CHAR (A_POBSYSENUMS. PSS_ID)

• With the clause does not work in SqlPlus for DataBase 11 GR 8 1 material

  I have 11 GR 1 database material, when I connect to my database through SqlPlus (version 8.0.6.0.0) this query

  with x as (select * from areas) select * from x;

  does not work. But when you use SqlPlus provided by 11g, this query works well. This query can run on an older version of SqlPlus?

  user12222356 wrote:
  This client software is installed with Oracle developer 6i form. should I remove all the form developer? Latest version of the form developer is available for 11 GR 1 matter?

  Well, you have problems with the developer of forms?

  I wouldn't recommend delete because you have problems with the SQL more customer that goes with it. I recommend to download the instant client and using them for your needs of sqlplus and leaving the rest products installed on your machine only.

• Order By clause does not

  I have a very basic SQL statement that I am running on a simple table of three columns. I just want to choose two of the three columns basing selection on a column, then rank each other. I use version 9.2.0.1.0 and I tried to use sqlplus and toad 10.6 and the results are the same in both. My problem is that even if I use an Order By clause the results not be sorted. I have countless statements written and never had a problem with the Order By clause before. I'm puzzled.

  Executed SQL statement:

  Select COL3 From Table1 where COL2 = 1 Order By COL3;

  Result:

  DXXXXX
  NXXX Mxxx/Cxxxx CXXV
  Nzzzz Ezzzz
  Oxxxxxxxxxx Exxxx
  Rxxxxxxxxx Exxxx
  Sxxxxxxx Exxxx
  Sxxxxxx Hxxx
  gxxxxxxx

  You should know that I replaced everything except the first letter of each letters to alter woth Word. There's nothing remarkable about the table:

  Executed SQL statement:

  DESC Table1;

  Result:

  Table1 TABLE:
  Name                                      Null?    Type
  ----------------------------------------- -------- ----------------------------
  COL1                                                   NUMBER
  COL2                                                   NUMBER
  COL3 VARCHAR2 (255)

  Hello

  Use this...

  Select COL3 From Table1 where COL2 = 1 Order By LOWER (COL3);

  It should work once you order by the case-based.

  When you view, its up to you, if you want to use all the conversions of case or not

• use of clause does not support

  I have a table with the following values punchdata.

  create the table punchdata as (select 1 employee_id, to_date (January 21, 2011 08:00 ',' dd/mm/yyyy hh24 ') punch_time, 'out' punch_type of all the double union)

  Select 1 employee_id, to_date (21 January 2011 16:01 ',' dd/mm/yyyy hh24 ') punch_time, 'out' punch_type of all the double union

  Select 1 employee_id, to_date (21 January 2011 16:10 ',' dd/mm/yyyy hh24 ') punch_time, 'in' punch_type of all the double union

  Select 1 employee_id, to_date (January 23, 2011 08:47 ',' dd/mm/yyyy hh24 ') punch_time, 'out' punch_type of all the double union

  Select 1 employee_id, to_date (24 January 2011 08:10 ',' dd/mm/yyyy hh24 ') punch_time, 'in' punch_type of all the double union

  Select 1 employee_id, to_date (24 January 2011 16:47 ',' dd/mm/yyyy hh24 ') punch_time, 'out' punch_type of all the double union

  Select 1 employee_id, to_date (January 25, 2011 16:00 ',' dd/mm/yyyy hh24 ') punch_time, 'out' punch_type of all the double union

  Select 1 employee_id, to_date (January 26, 2011 08:00 ',' dd/mm/yyyy hh24 ') punch_time, 'in' punch_type of all the double union

  Select employee_id 2, to_date (January 21, 2011 08:00 ',' dd/mm/yyyy hh24 ') punch_time, 'out' punch_type of all the double union

  Select employee_id 2, to_date (21 January 2011 16:10 ',' dd/mm/yyyy hh24 ') punch_time, 'out' punch_type of all the double union

  Select employee_id 2, to_date (January 21, 2011 16:11 ',' dd/mm/yyyy hh24 ') punch_time, 'in' punch_type of all the double union

  Select employee_id 2, to_date (21 January 2011 17:10 ',' dd/mm/yyyy hh24 ') punch_time, 'in' punch_type of all the double union

  Select employee_id 2, to_date (January 23, 2011 08:47 ',' dd/mm/yyyy hh24 ') punch_time, 'out' punch_type of all the double union

  Select employee_id 2, to_date (24 January 2011 08:10 ',' dd/mm/yyyy hh24 ') punch_time, 'in' punch_type of all the double union

  2 Select employee_id, to_date (24 January 2011 16:47 ',' dd/mm/yyyy hh24 ') punch_time, 'out' double punch_type)

  When I try to create a view as follows, I get error unsupported use of clause.

  The query works when run independently.

  create view formattedpunches as)

  with got_r_num AS

  (

  SELECT p

  ROW_NUMBER () OVER (PARTITION BY employee_id,

  ORDER BY punch_time

  ) AS r_num

  OF punchdata p

  )

  SELECT employee_id NVL (i.employee_id, o.employee_id)

  , to_char (i.punch_time,'dd/mm/yyyy hh24 ') AS punch_in

  , to_char (o.punch_time,'dd/mm/yyyy hh24 ') AS punch_out

  Got_r_num I have

  FULL OUTER JOIN got_r_num o ON o.employee_id = i.employee_id

  AND o.r_num = i.r_num + 1

  AND o.punch_type <>i.punch_type

  WHERE the NVL (i.punch_type, "in") = "en".

  AND NVL (o.punch_type, 'out') = 'out '.

  ORDER BY employe_id

  NVL (punch_in, punch_out)

  )

  I use oracle 10g

  Help, please

  Here is the test

  SQL > select * from v version $;

  BANNER

  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Oracle Database 11 g Enterprise Edition Release 11.2.0.3.0 - 64 bit Production

  PL/SQL Release 11.2.0.3.0 - Production

  CORE Production 11.2.0.3.0

  AMT for Linux: Version 11.2.0.3.0 - Production

  NLSRTL Version 11.2.0.3.0 - Production

  SQL > create view formattedpunches as

  with got_r_num AS

  (

  SELECT p

  ROW_NUMBER () OVER (PARTITION BY employee_id,

  ORDER BY punch_time

  ) AS r_num

  OF punchdata p

  )

  SELECT employee_id NVL (i.employee_id, o.employee_id)

  , to_char (i.punch_time,'dd/mm/yyyy hh24 ') AS punch_in

  , to_char (o.punch_time,'dd/mm/yyyy hh24 ') AS punch_out

  Got_r_num I have

  FULL OUTER JOIN got_r_num o ON o.employee_id = i.employee_id

  AND o.r_num = i.r_num + 1

  AND o.punch_type <> i.punch_type

  WHERE the NVL (i.punch_type, "in") = "en".

  AND NVL (o.punch_type, 'out') = 'out '.

  ORDER BY employe_id

  NVL (punch_in, punch_out);

  Created view.

  Best regards

  Mohamed Houri

• WITH the Clause does not work in 11g

  Hi all

  I run this query via PL/SQL developer in 11g, but it shows no data to me.

  with aquery as (c1, c2 from t1 select where c2 = 20130101) select * from aquery.

  However, when I run only the SELECT, and then it retrieves the output.

  Select c1, c2 from t1 where c2 = 20130101

  The db user privileges both CREATE MV and CREATE Table in this database.

  Thank you.

  I have no developer PL/SQL, but I do not have 11.2.0.4, and your query works for me in sqlplus and SQL Developer, the problem is with PL/SQL Developer, or maybe a transient network issue any.  You simply get an error any or all not the lines selected?

  John

• Programmatic setting of the place where clause does not.

  Hello
  
  I use Jdeveloper 11.1.2.2.
  
  I'm trying to interview some lines of the VO by placing the VO in the programmatic way as it appears in this documentation: http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E15523_01/web.1111/b31974/bcquerying.htm#CHDEBEAF
  
  But it returns no rows. While I was trying to interview through the SQL command line he questions the lines.
  
  Are there conditions that only bind the variables declared in the VO can be queried in the programmatic way? I tried also. It is not always all the lines.
  
  Thank you
  
  Nigel.

  I meant turn on diagnostics.

  http://jdeveloperfaq.blogspot.com/2009/12/FAQ-6-How-to-fine-tune-ADF-Diagnostics.html

  Published by: in the line of fire on July 25, 2012 11:54

• Simple SQL - NOT IN the clause does not

  The platform is sitting 11.1.0.7 on Linux
  
  Piece of sql below
  
  I want to select rows from tab1 that do not match on veh_id as follows in tab2:
  
  Select *.
  of tab1 t1
  WHERE t1. VEH_ID not IN (SELECT t2. VEH_ID OF THE tab2 t2)
  
  Result: no row is returned, although it is veh_ids in tab1 that aren't in the tab2
  
  However, the following modified code returns the rows:
  Select *.
  of tab1 t1
  WHERE t1. VEH_ID not IN (SELECT t2. VEH_ID OF tab2 t2 WHERE t2. VEH_ID IS NOT NULL)
  
  Question: Should I always state explicitly that I only discovered veh_ids that are not null, and it is above expected behavior?
  
  Thanks in advance.

  You might like this, it explains a bit deeper on the caveats you need to keep in mind the use IN or EXISTS:

  http://asktom.Oracle.com/pls/asktom/f?p=100:11:0:P11_QUESTION_ID:442029737684

• WITH THE CLAUSE DOES NOT WORK

  Hello everyone,
  I have the suite Oracle version:
  
  SQL & gt; selection of version of $ v; *
  
  BANNER
  ----------------------------------------------------------------
  Oracle9i Enterprise Edition Release 9.2.0.8.0 - 64 bit Production
  PL/SQL Release 9.2.0.8.0 - Production
  CORE Production 9.2.0.8.0
  AMT for Solaris: 9.2.0.8.0 - Production Version
  NLSRTL Version 9.2.0.8.0 - Production
  
  But when I try to run a query with * 'with the clause"* it gives following error:
  
  SQL & gt; with sam as (select from asap.triangular_reco_aug) *.
  SP2-0734: beginning of unknown command «with sam a...» "- rest of line is ignored.
  SQL & gt;
  
  Could someone please why this is happening?

  What is your version of SQL * more? If you are using a version earlier than 9.2 then it is probably intercept the syntax error before it happens even to the database that supports.

• Why SQL THAT does not

  Can anyone help. Why this WHERE clause does not.
  
  The results of the SQL database extract depend on selections in an online html form. The user can select any or all of the options. The problem seems to be the Or ready LIKE '% varReqBy'. If I use OR (as shown) only data from the variable ReqBy is correctly retrieved from any other playlist data. Variable, but all the others using the retrieves AND nothing of the ReqBy work fine. I need to keep SIMILAR and generic items % as it is a free text box.
  
  Y at - there anyone out there who can help. I have search everywhere on the web, but anyway, I found seem to suggest that it should work. What Miss me?
  
  Here is my code
  
  SELECT *.
  OF dbo.adhoc
  WHERE Ref = "varRef" or ActionedTo = "varActTo" emergency or = "varUrg" or status = 'varStat' or ready LIKE '% varReqBy '.
  ORDER BY dateofRequest desc
  
  PS the form uses a post method.

  Brilliant Lionstone just changed the default value or 1% varReqBy and it works. FAB thanks a lot.

• Materialized view does not quickly refresh with sysdate in where clause

  Hi all

  I am trying to create a view, materialized with sysdate in where clause. This makes the complex query, and so I can't create a quick refreshment mview.

  I tried to create with rowid too, but it does not create a quick refreshment.

  I was wondering if someone can advise me, how can I accomplish this task, which would be really appreciated.

  The query is:

  create a materialized view PS_MEETING

  build the DEFERRED payment

  Refresh quickly with rowid

  as

  SELECT *.

  MEETING M

  WHERE state_desc = 'VIC '.

  OR Meet_date < TRUNC (SYSDATE);

  the behavior is documented: http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E11882_01/server.112/e25554/basicmv.htm#DWHSG8201

  General restrictions on update quickly

  The definition of the materialized view query is limited as follows:

  • The materialized view must not contain references to non-repetitive phrases such as SYSDATE and ROWNUM .

  So I guess that you would need a more static than sysdate condition - or another strategy update.

• CFQUERYPARAM tag does not work in the GROUP BY clause

  I get an error whenever I put a CFQUERYPARAM tag in a GROUP BY clause. I saw on another forum, someone had a similar problem with the ORDER BY clause
  
  Here's a sample of what might look like my code
  Select x, y, z of ABC
  Group of < cfqueryparam value = 'x' cfsqltype = "cf_sql_float" >
  
  Here is the error I get.
  
  Run database query error.
  [Macromedia] [Oracle JDBC Driver] [Oracle] ORA-00979: not a GROUP BY expression
  
  Any idea?

  Cachedwithin and cachedafter functions store the query results in the RAM of the server. This means that, even if it is cached, when you run it, you get the cached result instead of going to the database to run again. This increases the speed of course, but if the data is changed during the period of cover, you have accuracy problems.

  It creates no memory problems. In the administrator you book a certain amount of memory for the query cache. If you exceed this amount, the last request to shoot the first query on, or something like that.

  In regards to what you're trying to do on the binding of variables to your group by clause, this isn't what cfqueryparam has been designed for. It has been designed to
  where clauses (where it =
  or insert queries (insert in my values in the table (field) ())
  and things like that.

  You try to use it for anything other than what it was designed for, which explains why it does not work for you.

• Super fetch does not

  also search window service does not

  Hello

  1. what version of windows you are using on the computer?
  2. you receive an error message/code? If Yes, what is the exact error message?

  Try to start Superfetch in services and let us know if you get an error code.

  Method 1

  Manual steps to turn on superfetch services:

  (a) click Start, type services.msc and press to enter.
  (b) of the list of items, scroll down to Superfetch. Change type of startup to Automatic and click on the Start button to start the service.
  (c) click apply and then click ok.

  Reference:

  Solving the problems of job search and indexing.
  This utility ensures that the Windows Search service is running and checks if you have the correct permissions to search all the directories on your computer.
  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows7/open-the-search-and-indexing-Troubleshooter

  Method 2

  Delete Temporary files:

  (a) click on start/run. A box opens.

  (b) type folder

  (c) a window will open showing you all the temporary files.

  (d) to select all the files by pressing ctrl + A and after selecting to delete by pressing the delete key.

  Method 3

  To empty the Prefetch folder:

  (a) click on Start/Run. Type the PREFETCH , and click OK to launch a Prefetch file.

  (b) under the Prefetch folder, select all files and delete them all and empty the Prefetch folder.

  (c) to remove all files press press CTRL + A keys on your keyboard to select all, and then press DELETE to remove all.

  (d) close the Prefetch folder.

  It will be useful.