Filter for the VPN VPN hairpin

Similar Questions

• Could not mount the file. It has not been possible to find a filter for the requested command.

  Get the error message:

  Could not mount the file. It has not been possible to find a filter for the requested command.

  Why is - this happens when I open documents using Mac advertising agency and I'm on PC?

  Hi Mikael,

  files have been archived in archive zip-file when transferred via the ftp protocol? I guess, not.

  If the files were already placed in a document, InDesign on the agency side the following workflow might be the solution:

  Office on Mac OSX:

  1 package the InDesign document, as well as placed images and fonts of the necessary document with InDesign packing device.

  2. the folder packed in a zip zip file.

  3. download the zip file to an ftp server

  You on Windows:

  1. download the zipfile to your own workload.

  2 unzip the zip on your workload. Do not delete the zip file.

  3. rename the folder of the package to fit your scheme of naming of jobs (option)

  4 rename the InDesign document to adapt to your schema naming of jobs (option)

  5. open the InDesign file in the packed file.

  Do not move or save somewhere else.

  Alternative:

  Work with Dropbox to share documents on a shared volume of Dropbox, if documents must move forward and backward between you and the Agency.

  Uwe

• InDesign doesn't let me place an eps file... gives an error "cannot place this file. No filter for the requested operation. »

  InDesign doesn't let me place an eps file... gives an error "cannot place this file. No filter for the requested operation. »

  This happens with a particular .eps file or many .eps files?

  • The EPS files from Illustrator? What parameters are used when files are saved?
  • Also this happens for all files created in Illustrator EPS (even one you create brand new, with just a few text and simple work in it).
  • Where are stored the EPS files that you place in InDesign?  If there is a form of corruption of files on the hard drive? (Maybe need repair file permissions?).
  • If you work on a network: can the files when they are saved as EPS files on your hard drive?

  CARI

• Filter for the bearing column week on number of possibilities

  Hi all - I am trying to create a report that shows the number of projects for the past weeks 13 with a column for each week.
  
  I can get the correct filter for the current week, but I don't know how to revise my expression sql for the previous weeks.
  
  I use the 'In between' operator on the column of date with the following sql expressions:
  
  TIMESTAMPADD (SQL_TSI_DAY,-(DAYOFWEEK (CURRENT_DATE)-1), CURRENT_DATE)
  and
  TIMESTAMPADD (SQL_TSI_DAY, 7-DAYOFWEEK (CURRENT_DATE), CURRENT_DATE)
  
  As I said, this works to get the data for the current week. Does anyone know how I would revise to search beforehand for the week or two weeks earlier?
  
  Thanks for any help!
  Lacey

  Hello!

  If I understand correctly, you want to get a report showing the number of project per week for the current week and 12 weeks before? But according to what date? The date of project creation (I guess you have a field like that)?

  In this case, you will need to place a filter by saying something like:

  Where "Date of creation" between "Current date" and "Date of the day - 12 weeks.
  * Date Opened. Date BETWEEN TIMESTAMPADD (SQL_TSI_WEEK-12, CURRENT_DATE) AND CURRENT_DATE *.

  I guess you'll have to use the TIMESTAMPADD function with interval SQL_TSI_WEEK, the current date and the value 12.

  I tested the service request creation date to have the number of service request for the last 5 weeks, it worked...

  I hope this will help, do not hesitate to ask for more!

  Max

• Check the ISE for the VPN Cisco posture

  Hello community,

  first of all thank you for taking the time to read my post. I have a deployment in which requires the characteristic posture of controls for machines of VPN Cisco ISE. I know that logically once a machine on the LAN, Cisco ISE can detect and apply controls posture on clients with the Anyconnect agent but what about VPN machines? The VPN will end via a VPN concentrator, which then connects to an ASA5555X that is deployed as an IPS only. Are there clues to this?

  Thank you!

  The Cisco ASA Version 9.2.1 supports the change in RADIUS authorization (CoA) (RFC 5176). This allows for the gesticulations of users against the ISE Cisco VPN without the need of an IPN. Once a VPN user connects, the ASA redirects web traffic to the LSE, where the user is configured with a Network Admission Control (NAC) or Web Agent. The agent performs specific controls on the user's computer to determine its conformity against one together configured posture rules, such as the rules of operating system (OS) patches, AntiVirus, registry, Application, or Service.

  The posture validation results are then sent to the ISE. If the machine is considered the complaint, then the ISE can send a RADIUS CoA to the ASA with the new set of authorization policies. After validation of the successful posture and CoA, the user is allowed to access internal resources.

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/security/Adaptive-Security-Appliance-ASA-software/117693-configure-ASA-00.html

• Configuration file for the VPN concentrator

  Hello

  I have a text-based VPN concentrator configuration file, and I want to know if there is a configuration guide of Concentrator VPN that I can use to refer to this file. The configuration on cisco.com guide is currently for the GUI based configuration.

  Furthermore, if there is a tool/utility that will read the configuration file in the format GUI without physical access to the device, which will also help.

  Thanks in advance for any assistance.

  There is a "XML export screen" in the management section of the files on the VPN concentrator. You can export the current configuration of the concentrator in a XML format, which provides the labels and values for the fields in the configuration file.

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/vpn3000/vpn3000_47/Administration/Guide/Fileman.html#wpxref53361

• need help for the VPN connection

  Hi guys

  can you help with that?

  I installed a VPN connection, but the tunnel shows that status: upward and the protocol description: down.

  debugging is turned on and displays following-

  ITS has applications pending (xx.xx.xx.xx local port 500, xx.xx.xx.xx remote port 500)

  DEC 20 02:39:26.762: ISAKMP: (2142): sitting IDLE. From QM immediately (QM_IDLE)

  02:39:26.762 20 Dec: ISAKMP: (2142): start Quick Mode Exchange, M - ID 3357871564

  02:39:26.762 20 Dec: ISAKMP: (2142): initiator QM gets spi

  DEC 20 02:39:26.762: ISAKMP: (2142): Pack xx.xx.xx.xx my_port 500 peer_port 500 (I) sending QM_IDLE

  02:39:26.762 20 Dec: ISAKMP: (2142): sending a packet IPv4 IKE.

  02:39:26.762 20 Dec: ISAKMP: (2142): entrance, node 3357871564 = IKE_MESG_INTERNAL, IKE_INIT_QM

  02:39:26.762 20 Dec: ISAKMP: (2142): former State = new State IKE_QM_READY = IKE_QM_I_QM1

  02:39:26.794 20 Dec: ISAKMP (2142): packet received from xx.xx.xx.xx dport 500 sport Global 500 (I) QM_IDLE

  02:39:26.794 20 Dec: ISAKMP: node set-419503660 to QM_IDLE

  DEC 20 02:39:26.794: ISAKMP: (2142): HASH payload processing. Message ID = 3875463636

  DEC 20 02:39:26.794: ISAKMP: (2142): treatment protocol NOTIFIER PROPOSAL_NOT_CHOSEN 3

  SPI 2561284360, message ID = 3875463636, a = 0x87D0CFC8

  DEC 20 02:39:26.794: ISAKMP: (2142): removal of spi 2561284360 message ID = 3357871564

  02:39:26.794 20 Dec: ISAKMP: (2142): node-937095732 error suppression REAL reason "remove larval.

  02:39:26.794 20 Dec: ISAKMP: (2142): node-419503660 error suppression FALSE reason 'informational (en) State 1.

  02:39:26.794 20 Dec: ISAKMP: (2142): entry = IKE_MESG_FROM_PEER, IKE_INFO_NOTIFY

  02:39:26.794 20 Dec: ISAKMP: (2142): former State = new State IKE_P1_COMPLETE = IKE_P1_COMPLETE

  02:39:46.798 20 Dec: ISAKMP: (2142): purge the node-1177810765

  02:39:46.798 20 Dec: ISAKMP: (2142): purge the node-138734109

  02:39:56.763 20 Dec: % s-6-IPACCESSLOGRL: the rate limited or missed 2 sachets of access list record

  DEC 20 02:39:56.763: IPSEC (key_engine): request timer shot: count = 2,.

  local (identity) = xx.xx.xx.xx:0, distance = xx.xx.xx.xx:0,

  local_proxy = 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0/0/0 (type = 4),

  remote_proxy = 0.0.0.0/0.0.0.0/0/0 (type = 4)

  the config is following.

  crypto ISAKMP policy 10

  BA 3des

  preshared authentication

  Group 2

  ISAKMP crypto key xxxxxx address xx.xx.xx.xx

  !

  !

  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-sha-hmac vpnset

  transport mode

  !

  Crypto ipsec tech profile

  Set transform-set vpnset

  !

  !

  my-map 20 ipsec-isakmp crypto map

  defined peer xx.xx.xx.xx

  Set transform-set vpnset

  match address 155

  Hello

  As for your question, you can have more than 1 card crypto on the interface.

  However, you can use the same card encryption for several strategies. You can change the ma-card to vpnmap.
  In this way the two are enabled on the same interface, with one having a higher priority than the other.

  So if a package came from inside, the first crypto ACL interface is checked and then the next and so on. The first match found is chosen for the IPsec negotioation.

• Unable to browse the internet for the VPN (ASA5505 running 8.3)

  We have improved our ASA 5505 to 8.3 firmware image (2) and we have a working VPN configuration (customer VPN in Windows can connect and browse the network of the company as well as their local networks [split tunnel seems to work in this regard]).  However, some time connected they are unable to also browse the internet.  In our configuration of 8.2 (1) we have done 'something' to allow remote users to browse the internet at the same time, but apparently this is not transferred in the upgrade.

  I'm sure it's a simple nat our order routing, but it can't know.  I've gotta hit the road now but will post our config this afternoon if no one knows the "secret" to do.  Ideally, internet traffic to remote users out of their internet connection and not be achieved through the office.  We understand the risks associated with it.

  Hi Scott,.

  To the best of my knowledge, I don't think that l2tp over IPSec supports split tunneling. If you use the Cisco VPN client, you should be able to get this working.

  What we can do in this case is to set up turn on the SAA for these vpn clients. Please add the commands to run below:

  permit same-security-traffic intra-interface

  network of the NETWORK_OBJ_10.0.0.0_27 object

  dynamic NAT interface (outdoors, outdoor)

  Let me know if it helps!

  See you soon,.

  Assia

• Œuvres ping for the VPN ASA5505 RDP does not work?

  I have an ASA5505 VPN remote access facility

  I have a server connected directly behind the ASA and I can ping the server without problem.

  The reports being encrypted and decrypted packets VPN client

  However when I try to RDP to the server packages encyrpted keep incrementing but the decrypted packets are not.

  I also do not see all RDP traffic hit the server (checked by ethereal)

  I did a packet trace and it succeeds, but ends with a parody of IP which I believe is correct as is the vpn traffic and not actually be encrypted.

  This is the correction of the RDP session, I'm confused by one ICMP denied on line 2 that I am able to ping the server?

  % ASA-6-302013: built of TCP connections incoming 88193 for external:172.16.24.4/50984 (172.16.24.4/50984) at internal:192.168.100.146/3389 (192.168.100.146/3389) (roger_ssl)

  % ASA-4-313004: Denied ICMP type = 0, of laddr 172.16.24.4 on the external interface to 192.168.100.146: no matching session

  % ASA-609001 7: built internal local-host: 192.168.100.37

  % ASA-6-302015: built connection UDP incoming 88194 for external:172.16.24.4/50620 (172.16.24.4/50620) at internal:192.168.100.37/53 (192.168.100.37/53) (roger_ssl)

  % ASA-4-313004: Denied ICMP type = 0, of laddr 172.16.24.4 on the external interface to 192.168.100.37: no matching session

  % ASA-6-302015: built connection UDP incoming 88195 for external:172.16.24.4/64598 (172.16.24.4/64598) at internal:192.168.100.37/53 (192.168.100.37/53) (roger_ssl)

  % ASA-4-313004: Denied ICMP type = 0, of laddr 172.16.24.4 on the external interface to 192.168.100.37: no matching session

  % ASA-4-313004: Denied ICMP type = 0, of laddr 172.16.24.4 on the external interface to 192.168.100.37: no matching session

  % 302014-6-ASA: disassembly of the TCP connection 88193 for external:172.16.24.4/50984 to internal:192.168.100.146/3389 duration 0: bytes of 00:00 0 flow closed by inspection (roger_ssl)

  I have that configured NAT

  NAT (internal, external) static source 192.168.100.0 192.168.100.0 static destination VPN_172 VPN_172

  The only logical bit that is closed by the inspection flow? Is this to say that the server has not responded?

  And decrypt packets increase not when trying to RDP

  Does this mean anyting to anyone that I have arrived at the end of my knowledge of the SAA on this one!

  Thank you

  Roger

  Answer is based on your other thread:

  https://supportforums.Cisco.com/thread/2207372

• How do I display values skyrocket in the IR filter for the joined table columns?

  Hello
  
  I have a problem in the IR the query is based on a table, joined with other tables. I would like to provide users the ability to use IR filter search bar in the joined table columns. The problem facing on this filter, the Expression field, by pressing the arrow button displays values for the fields in the primary table, but not for fields that come from joined tables. Have you experienced this behavior in your reports? Is this normal?
  
  TIA

  Hello

  Correlated subqueries can improve performance - but it does not depend on the involved tables, the number of columns and the existence of indices. As far as I know, the optimizer has problems with them. You could try to explain the Plans on the two statements to verify that.

  In any case, I created a new test page with the SQL for IR:

  SELECT E.EMPNO,
  E.ENAME,
  D.DEPTNO,
  D.DNAME,
  E2.EMPNO "EMPNO2",
  E2.ENAME "ENAME2"
  FROM EMP E, EMP2 E2, DEPT D
  WHERE E.EMPNO = E2.EMPNO(+)
  AND E.DEPTNO = D.DEPTNO(+)
  AND E2.PRIMARY_EMPLOYEE(+) = 'Y'
  

  http://Apex.Oracle.com/pls/OTN/f?p=267:226

  As far as I can see, it works properly - except that if I do a filter on the ename column, when I try to create a second filter, drop-down lists ename all the values, while the other columns list only the available values after having applied the first filter. Which seems strange that the filters are applied as ANDS. But it does the same thing for other areas - IE, the field used in a filter is not filtered for the second filter - so I guess this is normal, but only a person in Apex could probably explain why it is so.

  Otherwise, everything seems to work as I expect and the above page works the same as my test page, which uses external joins http://apex.oracle.com/pls/otn/f?p=267:224

  Andy

• Use of the filter for the simplest needs Expression

  On the project I'm working on, I use rule Manager to evaluate hundreds of rules against the simple events based on a table alias (a line at a time, as the documents are). However, my needs are evolving to support multiple sets of rules that would be assessed against incoming data conditionally. It will also be managing versions of rulesets.
  
  These requirements do not appear to correspond to the way that rules Manager stores its rules, where all rows in a table of the Rule are always evaluated, and any creation of a new category of rule requires a new table, recall stored proc etc... I am mainly concerned about the proliferation of tables of the class rule I added new sets of rules. Given that I don't use any of the advanced features that offers of management rules on the Expression of basic filter functionality (for example the complex events), I'm looking for in a simple ExpFil of installation and use of the EVALUATION operator. This will allow me to store several rulesets in the same table of expressions (separated by a field of type or ruleset_id) and does not require as much structural work to add new sets of rules.
  
  Things seem to work very well in my first attempts, but I think that my main question is proc PROCESS_RULES of RM doesn't on the optimization of the assessment of the rules in the rule Manager - no additional optimization which is not offered by the basic functionality of ExpFil? Everything I do is a simple query to find the rules corresponding to a specific document:
  
  SELECT cr.*
  OF COMP_RULE_TEST cr, doct DOC_TABLE
  WHERE doct.doc_id = 123
  AND EVALUATE (cr. RULE_COND, FApprcomp.GetVarchar (doct.rowid)) = 1;
  
  Thank you!

  Hello

  Simple rules, there no notable performance only difference between Manager rules and filter expression. Please ensure that the indexes are created for the Expression column (they are automatically created for the rule Classes).

  Just to be complete: If you want to use several data structures and to define simple rules on the structures of the individual event, you can set a rule to structure class composite event and not really to define complex rules. For example, a rule configured for the table attributes class two alias, po and if maybe two simple rules that are associated with the simple event matching.

  Rule condition 1:
      
          
      
  
  Rule condition 2:
      
          
          
  

  For a new line in the associated table of attribute "po", rules defined with the name of the corresponding event are evaluated.

  Hope this helps,
  -Aravind.

• Creating a filter for the existing table

  Hello
  
  I have a table and initially I didn't intend to use the filter on the table... but due to needs sudden I have to add the filter to the table and I can not afford to recreate the table.
  My version of jdev is 11.1.1.6
  
  Thank you
  Tarun

  Hello

  Add the property
  -filterModel
  -sortProperty
  -filterable = true

  concerning
  Peter

• expression to filter for the aletr newspaper

  Hello
  
  I oracle10g race and I have the configuration of filters on the expression of filter the alerts log, as shown below:
  
  .*ORA-0*(54|1142|1146|942|2063|2062|28501|3136|02019|2050|1580|25307|1652|01555|16146|1013|03135|01013|20005|16401)\D.*
  
  
  Now, I want to add the filter to the error: ORA-16146
  
  How can I add this error to the list mentioned above. I am not able to understand the syntax.
  
  Can someone help me with the syntax to add another error that is not ora-0 *.
  
  Thanks in advance.
  Philip.

  Hello

  .*ORA-0*(54|1142|1146|942|2063|2062|28501|3136|02019|2050|1580|25307|1652|01555|16146|1013|03135|01013|20005|16401|16146)\D.*

  Concerning

• Any way to book the award of the IP for the VPN connection?

  Our VPN benefits from using 1841 AAA and a private beach base 172.16.1.0 255.255.255.248.

  We would like to be able to permanently allocate an IP address to our web developer so we can add rules appropriate to the demilitarized zone.

  Is it possible to assign an IP address based on MAC instead of randomly? We want him to log on and also to be able to work from any remote location.

  Thank you

  Paul

  There are different approaches you can take.  You can configure a separate VPN for this web developer profile and associate it with an IP pool to a single address.  You can watch also assign a static IP address to the user using a protocol like RADIUS AAA.

  Todd

• Site of the error of phase 2 for the VPN site

  Dear all,

  We have a VPN site to site with a partner, we need to access three different hosts on the network of partners. Phase 1 came but there is problem with the guests of the three phase 2 we can only connected with a host of others are not connected, and they all share the same settings.

  Below is show access ip list matching packages shown but connection to host failed

  With the crypto ipsec to see his I saw send error and I don't know what could be responsible.

  Any body who could be wrong please help me to am exhausted.

  access-list

  10 permit ip host 4.2.3.1 4.2.6.22 (647594 matches)
  20 permit ip host 4.2.3.14 4.2.6.64 (47794 matches)
  30 permit ip host 41.2.3.37 41.2.6.76 (581720 matches)

  Crypto ipsec to show his

  local ident (addr, mask, prot, port): (41.2.3.37/255.255.255.255/0/0)
  Remote ident (addr, mask, prot, port): (4.2.6.76/255.255.255.255/0/0)
  current_peer 4.2.6.24 port 500
  LICENCE, flags is {origin_is_acl},
  #pkts program: encrypt 0, #pkts: 0, #pkts digest: 0
  #pkts decaps: 0, #pkts decrypt: 0, #pkts check: 0
  compressed #pkts: 0, unzipped #pkts: 0
  #pkts uncompressed: 0, #pkts compr. has failed: 0
  #pkts not unpacked: 0, #pkts decompress failed: 0
   Errors #send 198, #recv errors 0

  local crypto endpt. : 4.2.3.16, remote Start crypto. : 4.2.6.24
  clearly, mtu 1500, path mtu 1500, mtu 1500 ip mtu IDB FastEthernet4 ip
  current outbound SPI: 0x0 (0)
  PFS (Y/N): N, Diffie-Hellman group: no

  SAS of the esp on arrival:

  the arrival ah sas:

  SAS of the CFP on arrival:

  outgoing esp sas:

  outgoing ah sas:

  outgoing CFP sas:

  local ident (addr, mask, prot, port): (4.2.3.14/255.255.255.255/0/0)
  Remote ident (addr, mask, prot, port): (4.2.6.64/255.255.255.255/0/0)
  current_peer 4.2.6.24 port 500
  PERMITS, flags = {origin_is_acl, ipsec_sa_request_sent}
  #pkts program: encrypt 0, #pkts: 0, #pkts digest: 0
  #pkts decaps: 0, #pkts decrypt: 0, #pkts check: 0
  compressed #pkts: 0, unzipped #pkts: 0
  #pkts uncompressed: 0, #pkts compr. has failed: 0
  #pkts not unpacked: 0, #pkts decompress failed: 0
      Errors #send 508, #recv errors 0

  local crypto endpt. : 4.2.3.16, remote Start crypto. : 4.2.6.24
  clearly, mtu 1500, path mtu 1500, mtu 1500 ip mtu IDB FastEthernet4 ip
  current outbound SPI: 0x0 (0)
  PFS (Y/N): N, Diffie-Hellman group: no

  SAS of the esp on arrival:

  the arrival ah sas:

  SAS of the CFP on arrival:

  outgoing esp sas:

  outgoing ah sas:

  outgoing CFP sas:

  Edit: can you put the configuration on both sides of the tunnel? Otherwise re - check once more the configs on both sides