FLV video for the web?

Similar Questions

• Best video for the Web?

  I created a site offering artists around my city. The most important thing is the videos and that's what I have a problem with. Can you help me?

  I started with the flv files swf turned and who was allowed. The problem was he wouldn't play on IPAD and other devices.

  So, I read online that a mov or mp4 file was good. Today, I received so many responses from those who said that the video is so slow that they have not even watch.

  I tried to increase my size to a size close to youtube, so it was more visible then my first posts.

  The site is

  www.adamsstreetsessions.com

  Thanks in advance

  . FLV is currently the best format of video container for the Web...

  As a rescue use swfobject for Flash detection and provide a .mov as ALT content file

  Link to swfobject:

  http://code.Google.com/p/SWFObject/

  Sample .flv video that plays on the iPhone:

  http://www.cidigitalmedia.com/tutorials/Qt/play_qt.html

  relief is .mov file. View the source code to see how it works.

  A potential problem of slow download .mov files is if the moov atom is at the end of the file rather than the beginning... Hey, I don't do this kind of things, I just tell you about it. The download is not slow, it's just that the entire file has download before he plays. If the moov atom is at the end of the file, the full .mov file must be downloaded before the video starts to play. It will be not progressive download as an .flv file (another reason why .flv is the video container of choice).

  You can restructure the .mov files are needed by using QuickTime Pro, and save as.

  Google to know the exact details or check here:

  https://www.ezs3.com/members/login.cfm?hpage=Checking_Metadata_or_Moov_Atom_Location.cfm

  If the video bitrate and/or the size is a problem, investigate it to an old post:

  Video bitrate

  One of the principle of goal setting is to "begin with the end in mind". In this case, it will be very difficult to give good recommendations because the end is not defined. So I'll just make a few assumptions and you can correct me if necessary.
  First, I'll assume that you convert Flash, whether you want to broadcast this video on the Internet. If that's true, then going to make some assumptions about your potential viewers Internet connection download speeds. Let's just say that most have at least a 1.5 MB connection or faster.
  OK, that would mean that a video bitrate of half that generally provide a video download that is not interupped by the buffering (most of the time anyway). So assuming a video bitrate of 750 kbps, what would be the optimal display size?
  Before decide us, here's a little info on the bitrate. To read more high quality, the bitrate of the video is directly related to the size of the screen. In other words, more display, incoming data more are needed to correctly display the video. Think of bitrate in terms of a can of paint. If you have 1 quart of paint, you might be able to do a very nice job on an area of 32 X 24 feet. But if you try to stretch the same amount of paint on a surface area of 64 X 48 feet, the coverage is not as good and you get mediocre results.
  Similarly, a video display to 640 X 480 pixels will require 4 times the baud rate as a video displayed at 320 X 240 pixels to produce the same quality. Thus, for example, a video with a speed of 100 kbps, 160 X 120 displayed will produce the same quality results as a video with a bitrate of 1600 kb/s is displayed in 640 X 480.
  So, to sum it all, 750 Kbps, even up to 1000 kbps video rates can usually get delivered high-speed Internet on most connections. Higher rates may work for connections very fast but will cause problems for viewers with slower connections. Video display size has a direct impact on the final quality. In the range of 750 to 1000 Kbps, display size should be maintained around 450 or 500 width max (and whatever the height proportions claims). Yes it can be displayed larger, but the quality will suffer.
  Sounds like the audio settings are fine, especially for delivery on the Internet.
  Regarding the framerate, maintain the framerate video original raw for best results. Therefore, if the clip was shot at 24 frames per second, let him.
  In regards to video converters, you have the Flash 8 Video Converter? It works very well for the video to be delivered over the Internet. Don't forget, you're taking a Cadillac of video (h.264 HD) version and cram into a Chevy body so he can work on the Internet.

  Best wishes

  Adninjastrator

• With the help of videos quick time (for the web)

  Hi guys,.
  
  In my project, I use quick time videos in director, which work very well at its publishing and reading in the projector. However when I export for the web, video replay in the web browser. Is there something I'm missing when exporting?
  
  Thank you very much
  
  Rich

  Your QT files are too large. The Member is set to listen to? You can
  monitor percentStreamed (place a #field on the screen and update each)
  frame with member("QT").percentStreamed)

• whenever I want to play a video on the web, it retains a break constantly... How can I fix it (Fix

  Hi, whenever I want to play a video on the web, the video continues stopping constantly...

  Is there a way to fix it. ???

  Thank you for your help and your tiime...

  1. your internet connection speed is maybe not fast enough.
  2 servers may be experiencing high traffic.

• What size my image of background layer should be for the web?

  I do a logo design for someone I know and he wants that he placed ontop of a background texture steel. I source on an image of good quality, but despite my diligence in trying to understand how the resolution and the size of the image, I can't seem to grasp what I should do with it. I saw countless videos, but it must be a problem with the ol' brain ' in the head I.

  It is likely (at least for now) just for the web. My goal is just get it right so that it looks crisp and clear on the screen.

  The image I have is 1024 x 1384 pixel, 72 dpi. Yes 14.2 inches wide by 19.2 inches high.

  I have to change this at all? I'll be crop the image, but I'm worried that I will do it's too small and so it should be expanded, and I could meet some blurring.

  Should I expand? I heard that this isn't the most ideal thing.

  72 dpi is higher than the resolution must be for images of the screen, but is there an advantage to hit? Why couldn't just do 300 dpi for the heck of it?

  Do I need to pay attention to the thumbs, or is - this just good guide for when you print something?

  I'm honestly just trying to get my head around all of this, so that in the future, I can't spend as much time to know what I have to do. Everything I read and any help is greatly appreciated.

  I believe that we have the impression that the image was for the entire background. Being its a banner among the dimensions should be much smaller and therefore can be a picture of lower resolution due to this fact.

  With respect to the other dimension, this will depend on your design. For example it will fill the width or height of the screen?

  With respect to models, you send a single image to a web browser and the browser itself repeats this image. This is why it is desirable. Your image can be 10 x 10 pixels pixels in the right circumstances. For any detail real chances are she would most likely be around 512 x 512. More this image is the faster it will load, it is that she may have more details. Its up to you to find this balance.

• What is the best way to keep the high resolution when recording "for the web".

  the files that I save to the web so I can get them in jpg (or gif) are coming very pixelated.  That's when I print the image.

  What is the best way to save for the web, an image and keep the good resolution.

  using a business card template.  template Avery will allow me to attach images I want to project.  to do this...  I 'get file computer' and it deletes the image in but real little... then you are supposed to expand on your work as you want.  Well, when I enlarge this image file, it gets pixelated bad.  I think it's the way that I am saving it.  I do not adjust anything when I save.  Maybe I should.  This is where I need advice.

  That's what avery model notes on the images, I am allowed to use - when downloading the image, the maximum allowed size is 4 MB.  You can download the JPG and PNG RGB or CMYK images.  so when you recommend things, can you please take this into account

  Thanks for oyur times.

  Aida,.

  When you register with the default template using save for web, it's usually a setting very low.

  While in the registration window, you can set the size in pixels of the image you want with the quality and the resolution too.

  Refer to video tv.adobe.com save for web or Adobe Help file for detailed instructions.

  Florian

• What is the disadvantage of savings WITHOUT color profile for the web?

  I have discussed this issue in another thread and a clear argument against saving jpg files * without * a color profile must be performed.

  I'm very annoyed with how much more red and saturated, all my jpg files appear in IE (which does not read the sRGB embedded profile) compared to FF (which is the case).

  I tried to save the image even with the inclusion of unchecked color profile, and of course, IE and FF are showing the same image.

  It seems to me that including color profiles with jpg are just an invitation for different browsers interpret the image differently.

  Why not just save them all, WITHOUT color profiles?

  The downside to this, what exactly?

  mjyeager wrote:

  Emil, please do not confuse what follows for stubbornness...

  No worries, I never had such thoughts

  mjyeager wrote:

  ... IE does not read color profiles. The fact of FF. ERGO, in situations where a color profile is involved, the JPG will be different in each browser.

  True, without color managed programs and management the colors may not display an image in the same way. Except in the situation where the color profile describing the color of the image or the color values of an image without a color profile, by an extraordinary chance match the display capabilities of color of the device used by the program managed without colors.

  One of the problems that the addresses of color management is that all monitors will display the same color differently. Color management will make colors appear the same or as close as possible.

  A color managed program will send the RGB values of the color of the video card corrected to compensate for the differences between how your monitor displays color values and how they are perceived.

  For example, to help my Monitor wide gamut, when I create an image in Photoshop, with a red color pure R = 255, G = 0 and B = 0 and then do a screen capture, I can check how Photoshop sends these values to the video card. The result is R = 222, G = 65, B = 0 when I'm simulating an ideal sRGB display. So I can see how my colors appear on the screens of ideal sRGB. However, in reality, it is very likely to have a monitor displaying space sRGB color ideal without a color management, so to complete the color management chain, the other monitors that display my image must also have the appropriate color management to compensate for the differences in screen and display correctly RGB numbers representing the color that I see on my screen.

  mjyeager wrote:

  ... However, if the JPG has no color profile, image shows exactly the same way in both browsers...

  Who will most likely be a bad smell, which means not repoducing the expected color which is always the case with the browsers managed without colors.

  mjyeager wrote:

  ... Now, let's say this image - which looks the same in both browsers - is too hot. I can load it in Photoshop, change its hue and re-save is more what I'm looking for. The resulting image will then out - in the two browsers identically - the way I want to...

  Yes, the image will be the same in both browsers on your and any other monitor but the colors that you create (edit) will examine the way which only see you them on your monitor.

  mjyeager wrote:

  ... Now, what I think you are trying to do, is that I have no control on what are the conditions of viewing on the OTHER end (i.e., visitors to the site). They could range wide monitors, cheaper monitors, running MAC or PC, etc...

  I don't remember talking about this earlier, but yes, it's true.

  mjyeager wrote:

  ... It's true. I have no control over that. However, how including the color profile sRGB with the JPG would give me more control over these things I would not include? Unless you had to tell me that browsers arbitrarily apply a random color profile when in the absence of one, I am simply not understand how including the color with the JPG profile performs one another act that ensure that the picture is completely different in FF it does in Internet Explorer.

  You who are absolutely wrong. Color management is not to have any control over how other devices are setup, calibrated, etc.. As I said earlier make sure you communicate the colors scheduled correctly or as close as possible, as long as you and the destination use the proper color management. This means that the embedded profile FF will display correctly the planned colors while IE will not. If you do not include a color profile with your image both FF and IE will not display correctly the planned colors but they will be equal in that.

  mjyeager wrote:

  ... I understand the need for color profiles to print. In fact, my printer insists on the details when it comes to color profiles.

  But for the web? I'm still not understand where the downside is to omit the color profile. It's not like the browsers get CONFUSED when it is not included. Or that the colors will start randomly from refreshing one page to another.

  I am really trying to understand what you are saying here, but still haven't.

  In addition to what Marian said:

  If you create the colors using an sRGB display ideal (given the color management on your system works properly, it can be simulated by color of Photoshop on your range management widescreen when you assign the profile sRGB color to the image) and then on any ideal sRGB display, it will look the same you see on your screen regardless if it's with or without embedded sRGB color profile. However, in reality, it is unlikely to have a monitor, sRGB, display of the ideal space of sRGB color without color management. Now what does this mean in practice? Assume that users interested in, using the IE managed without colors on a PC with the Windows default color management. In other words, color management programs are told by the system monitor displays the ideal sRGB space, which is very likely to be the truth. Then users with this configuration with sRGB monitors will not see a difference between IE and FF when viewing your image with or without sRGB profile, the colors are not very likely to be the same that you see on the screen, but with the difference that is more likely to be accepted depending on how close to the ideal color space sRGB these monitors are. If some of these users with this configuration have wide range monitors, then the image will always be the same with or without sRGB profile, but with a very unacceptable difference of how you see it on your space to sRGB sumulated - strongly supersaturated.

  For users that have the color correctly managed systems, when the image is saved with a sRGB profile, it appears color managed programs such as FF the same or as close as possible to the way in which you can see on your monitor. Programs run without colors the case remains the same as that described above.

  A little history on how standard sRGB was created. It is a standard, including more things, but above all defining an abstract color space. It was created sometime after that the market was already flooded with computer monitors, and the creation of ideal sRGB color space was based on an average PC monitor display capabilities over time. After that the manufacturers used this standard sRGB as a target to create monitors.

  UN-color of programs run on PC have been created and tested using sRGB monitors so that they can't be considered reliable for showing intended to display colors if the images they use have been created using an sRGB they will be in the stadium of this range of sRGB.

• Publish video on the web step by step

  I cann't find any documentation presented just one simple thing how publish a video on the web.

  What I did so far more or less successful:

  1. a video encoded on an flv file

  2. I used import video files from my local drive folder

  3 choose a playback skin overall loan

  4. has been able to test and preview successfully

  Now started a few problems, sometimes I could see the movie on the web, sometimes included skin, sometimes without the skin.

  5. I saved fla in the folder as test.fla

  6. I've changed contentPath to my web http://www.myweb.com/folder/movie.flv

  7. I pressed video chips

  8. I found test.swf and test.html in my folder

  9. in the test.html file, I removed everything but just leave < object >... < / object >

  10. I transferred the three swf flv html files in the web folder

  I tried different ways.

  Sometimes I could see the movie, sometimes not.

  I could never see reading skin, I could see that once I moved the OverAll.swf also in the web folder. But why I need this?

  Where can I find a step by step instruction? or please help what am I doing wrong.

  Rolf

  1. you need the skin.swf on your server if you use a component flvplayback

  2. you must use a local path to your flv.

  3. you should not change your html embed file unless you know how to debug problems that result.

• How can I change my mood Message in Skype for the Web?

  How can I change my mood message in Skype for the Web?

  People of good news: you can now change your mood message in Skype for the Web

  Just click on the picture at the top left of your profile, and then click the small icon of pencil next to the message of change in activity.

• Possible security for the Web-based Configuration

  My colleagues and I found something very interesting today... Despite having configured the FTP security settings (which have been confirmed to set up and in funcitoning. I can't open an FTP session to our remote target without specifying a username admin and the password) If you open the configuration tool based OR web in a browser, you can send via FTP to and from the target using the file remote browser without being connected to all! Everyone knows this?

  Apparently, these permissions are separate from FTP, but you can define these special permissions on the page of the security configuration for the web-based configuration utility.

• Don't understand why can't listen to videos on the web sites ie HULU and ads. Using Vista + Adobe Flash player.

  Don't understand why can't listen to videos on the web sites ie HULU and ads. Using Vista + Adobe Flash player

   

  Hello

  1. what happens when you try to play videos on the mentioned website?

  2. you use Internet Explorer browser to play videos on the mentioned website? If so, which version?

  3. are you able to play videos on other websites like YouTube, etc?

   

  See the following article: If you use the Internet Explorer browser.

  The video problems when you use Internet Explorer:

  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/2532294

• When I try to watch a video on the web, the video does not show it's a black screen.

  I've had this laptop since 2010 and I could see the videos on the web without problem, but all of a sudden I can no longer watch videos. When I press on play video becomes black and nothing plays. I wonder what's the problem?

  Hello

  1 are you facing this problem with a specific Web site?
   
  2. what browser do you use to surf the web?
   
  3. what was the recent change in hardware or software performed on the computer before the question?
   
  Please follow the links below to solve the problem.
   
  Method 1
   
  How to troubleshoot a problem by performing a clean boot in Windows Vista or in Windows 7
  
  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/929135

  Note: Follow step 7 of the article mentioned above to start the computer in normal startup, once you have completed the necessary troubleshooting.

  Method 2
   
  The video problems when you use Internet Explorer
   
  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/2532294
   
  Please RRSP at this link if you are using an older version of Windows media player.
   
  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/909554
   
  I also suggest to run a network utility to verify network connectivity problems.
   
  In Windows network connection issues

   

  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/313242
   
  I hope this helps.

• Data for the Web service control

  Hello

  I have jdeveloepr User 12.1.3, I WSDL soap, I create the data control for the web service from the WSDL, the problem is when creating data controls the separate parameter that the method, for example, below it is the method that I call the setNotificationAction name and the parameter IN (P_ACTION, P_NOT_ID, P_PASSWORD_ERP, P_TOKEN (, P_USER_ID P_USER_ID_ERP), as below, why the separate parameter that the method?

  Note that I try the binding WSDL SOAP UI and its ok and works as expected.

  

  Resolved by changing the typesList.add (Object.class) at typesList.add (GenericType.class)

• What is the best export for the web?

  What is considered the best export from Adobe Illustrator CC 2015 for the web these days? I know that PNG has the color a bit better than JPEG files. How about SVG?

  What is your recommendation?

  Thank you

  For modern websites of today, vectors are now better saved in SVG. As long as you use the last CC 2015, use file > export to create the SVG (which is newer than the file > save under). It will yield a smaller SVG files.

  Better, photos are saved in JPEG format.

  PNG are not "keep color" better. The JPEG and PNG24 support millions of colors, but a JPEG will be able to compress photographic details better, if you end up with a file of faster loading.

  For HTML Email SVG is not appropriate, so I use PNG or GIF instead (whichever is smaller) to the line drawings in general I want to save it as SVG.

• Best app for the batch processing of photos for the web?

  I would like to know what is the best application for batch processing photos for the web quickly and easily. I'm a web editor and often need to resize, compress, or crop several photos and would like a quick way to configure the basic parameters and processes for example 20 pictures at once. Basically, I'm looking for something with the ability to FastStone Photo Resizer (I'm on a Mac and cannot use FastStone). I remember an once suggested graphic designer LightRoom - would that be a good idea or Adobe has something else? Or maybe not Adobe at all?

  PhotoShop seems heavy for this purpose: it is ideal to make the photo woth that much at the time, but less large to do less with many pictures at once. I know that I can implement some sort of macro-thingie, but I would like to be able to quickly change settings such as the percentage of compression or the width in pixels.

  I don't need a lot of editing tools, mostly just work in pixels, resizing, compression or cropping and save for the web in .jpg and .png - and Mac.

  I hope someone here can guide me in the right direction.

  Hi eval

  I think the best thing for you is Adobe photoshop elements, cover in simple not expensive and all what you want

  Photo Editor software & tools | Adobe Photoshop Elements 14

  concerning