Fortinet virtual with tagging VLAN

Similar Questions

• RV082 SB + switches with functionality of tag vlan

  Hi guys,.

  I have a small laboratory data center at home, with 1 Server iSCSI and VMware ESXi 5.1 3 guests. I run a few linux servers and windows servers.

  And a couple of years ago I bought a Cisco SB double RV082 VPN router and a Netgear smart switch in order to have more segmentantion and management on my network and the virtual machines. I was really happy with the Cisco router, because of stability and functionality.

  But after a while, I wanted to learn VLANS and vlan tagging and discovered that I wanted to create interfaces for the different VLANs. I installed the firewall open source pfSense, in order to create these VLANS with tagging of the firewall and on switches/esxi hosts. The pfSense has been installed in a virtual machine on one of the hosts vSphere, and which has become a headache if something happened to the host. So I decided to go back to the Cisco SB RV082.

  So here's my question:

  Is it possible to still have all these VLANS that I created on the switches and ESXi hosts when I swap to the Cisco router? Even if the Cisco support only port service VLAN, this shouldn't be a problem? Because of the Multiple subnet feature? These VLANs will have access to the Internet and does not have access to another. Only the primary network management network should have access to the VLAN.

  Let's say my primary network is 192.168.1.X and I have 5 VLAN with IP 192.168.2.X,... 3.X... 4.X etc. To be able to use these VLANs on all devices, do I need to assign each VLAN on the Cisco to a specific port? Which means I'll have 5 Cisco cables to the switch?

  I'll probably have a DC with DHCP and DNS on a few of VLANS I create. If DHCP for the different VLANs will be created like that and won't have the firewall (which RV082 can't stand?)

  In my head, this logical text/topic. But I'm not quite sure if you guys understand what I'm saying or want to accomplish here. So please don't not to ask :-)

  Thanks in advance.

  Hi Ruben, this router supports the only port VLAN basis. It does not support any tag VLAN (802. 1 (q). This is reflected by in, VLAN does not matter them, only the subnets.

  If you need the subnets to communicate through the router, you can activate the functionality of multiple subnet.

  If you want to limit disclosure of the host, you can try to establish access rules to limit communication subnet.

  -Tom
  Please mark replied messages useful

• VMnet bridge cannot not labeled past 1500 byte frames (1504 bytes with tag) - is there a solution?

  Hello

  I set up a Windows 7 with VMware Workstation 10 host.  I am running 3 guests: 2 Linux and Windows XP 1.  These individuals are bound by local network segments.  A Linux host (let's call it 'A') brudges network interface 1 to an Ethernet USB adapter attached to the host.

  The other invited Linux (let's call it 'B') bridges 4 network interfaces on the host of Win 7.  I do this Setup VLAN b (eth2.30, eth2.60, eth2.29, eth2.220) and bypass eth2 interface integrated on the host of Win 7.  I had to create a registry entry "MonitorMode" (http://www.intel.com/support/network/sb/CS-005897.htm) on the Windows 7 host in order to move the frames marked between the guest and the outside world (Win 7 strips incoming tags by default).  NIC integrated on the Win 7 host is connected to a Cisco switch as a 802. 1 q trunk.  Other hosts are connected to the switch via these VLANs on the trunk.  Applications on these hosts communicate with guests on the host of Win 7 on the VLAN, it is necessary.

  It works fine until I have try to get through the VMnet bridge frames that have an MTU greater than 1496.  These frameworks are interrupted whehter they are incoming or outgoing.  I suspect that the reason is an acceptable framework normally 1500 bytes is, when the tag, 1504 bytes and is therefore stripped on the VMNet bridge.  I tried to adjust the MTU on the NIC host and eth2 comments to 1496 and 1504.  No effect, as I expected.  Packet Capture one side of the bridge as these large frames MTU vmnet show are ignored at the bridge.

  I have control over some of the external systems (and of course all the guests) and I adjusted the MTU on these systems at 1496 bytes.  This works very well for these systems.  But for traffic from external guests that I can't change it, 1500 (1504 with tag) frames is ignored at the vmnet bridge.

  I have read that I need jumbo frames support so that it works.  I found documentation indicating extended frames are not supported in workstation 7.  I guess that has not changed in 10 WS.

  I tried an alternative approach: Create VLANs on the host of Win 7 using Intel PROset, remove the VLAN eth2 the Linux prompt and instead create multiple virtual NICs (eth2, 3, 4, 5) and fill each virtual NETWORK adapter to a host of Win 7 VLAN.  Although VMWare network Editor allows me to create these bridges, I can't pass any traffic through them regardless of the MTU.

  So, my questions:

  (1) are extended frames supported in 10 Workstation?  If so, how can I activate them?

  (2) I would be able to bridge a guest virtual NETWORK adapter to a VIRTUAL host LAN interface?

  (3) is there another way to do this?

  Thank you and best regards,

  Steve

  Solved!

  The other approach, I described in the previous post (creation of VLANs on the host of Win 7 using Intel PROset, remove the VLAN eth2 the Linux prompt and instead create multiple virtual NICs (eth2, 3, 4, 5) and fill each virtual NETWORK adapter to a host of Win 7 VLAN) works if I REMOVE the setting of registry MonitorMode I also described in the previous post.

  Wireshark showed that with the Win 7 host VLAN enabled and the value of MonitorMode tags VLAN were being stripped.  Eliminating MonitorMode allows the NIC to tag/UNTAG as needed by the configuration of VLAN PROset.  Since the frames are not marked as they are bridge to/from the comments, all the interfaces of my spend management full size in both feel.

• SWITCH Cisco/Linksys SLM224G: Problem with the VLAN

  Hello!

  I'm trying to set up a VLAN in my baskets. I have some knowledge about VLANs, but I still can not configure in my path.

  My situation:

  I have PC that contains two virtual machines, which works as a router between three networks: LAN, WAN, LAN2. It's a bit complicated, but I'll try to draw:

                                                   |-------------||----------------------------|                   |           e1|-to-eth1-VM2-----WAN|VirtualMachine 1        eth0|---trunk-VLAN1&2---|g1         e2|-to-eth0-VM2-----LAN2|eth0=VLAN1 eth1=VLAN2       |                   |           e3|-to-eth0-VM2-----LAN2 etc.|                         PC |                   |   SWITCH  e4||VirtualMachine 2            |                   |           e5|-to-eth1-VM1---wire-to-LAN2|eth0=VLAN3 eth1=VLAN4   eth1|---trunk-VLAN3&4---|g2         e6|-to-eth0-VM1-----LAN1|----------------------------|                   |           e7|-to-eth0-VM1-----LAN1 etc.                                                 |-------------|
  
  gX = Gigabit portseX = 100Mbit portsVMX = Virtual machine numberwire-to = patch-cord connection between ports on the switch
  
  Schema of routing and logical visibility:
  
  LAN1---VM1-----VM2---WAN              |LAN2----------|
  

  Important note is that LAN1 and LAN2 must be separated (visible only through routers). WAN must be visible through VM2 to LAN2 and through by VM1 and VM2 to LAN1. It seems easy, but VLAN that I did on this passage seems doesn't work.

  I do it like this:

  Step 1: Management of VLANS / create a VLAN...

  Creation of VLANS 1, 2, 3, 4 (numbers meters right now - I have now this number 1 is restricted to the switch).

  Step 2: Management of VLAN / Port to VLAN...

  Setting up VLAN1 with ports g1, e5 (the two labelled or not identified?-I have not seen any difference)

  Implementation VLAN2 with ports g1, e6, e7, etc...

  Implementation VLAN3 with ports g2, e2, e3, etc...

  Setting up VLAN4 with g2, e1 ports

  Step 3: Management of VLAN / Port setting...

  Implementation of ports e1 to PVID4 (chassis type = all I guess, but with "capture filter"?)

  Setting up port e2 at PVID3

  Setting up port PVID3 e3

  etc...

  Setting up port e5 for PVID1

  Setting up port e6 at PVID2

  Setting up port e7 for PVID2

  etc...

  Thus, on this configuration and that the switch it does not work for me

  I know that the switch is to see Mac since VLAN which is carried out by PC, because when I arrive in "Admin / dynamic address" I see pimps on the correct ports, with good VLAN ID. So the problem is to transmit a VLAN for their ports, then clear frames of ID and let the packets to go (and return: clear packages, add the VLAN ID and send to their Gigabit ports).

  Show the configuration is one of the many I tried :/ but I think this one is the best.

  Or maybe I don't know VLAN as I think and this scheme is impossible? Please tell me.

  Concerning

  and waiting for any suggestions,

  READ

  Hello.

  These products are processed by the Cisco Small Business Support Community.

  * If my post answered your question, please mark it as "acceptable Solution".

  * Do not forget to give a 'congratulations '. Thank you!

• Problem with the VLAN routing

  I try to put in place several VLAN on a Cisco 3560 switch. These new segments must be able to communicate with the VLAN 1 and even Internet access. I managed to add the VLAN and have network connectivity between the new VLAN.  However, these VIRTUAL to VLAN1 networks routing was not working properly.  Certainly something is missing or correct in this configuration. It would be much appreciated if someone can shed some light. Thanks in advance.

  Basic IP information:

  • Gateway 10.1.1.2
  • VLAN1: 10.1.1.1/24
  • VLAN2: 10.1.2.1/24
  • VLAN3: 10.1.3.1/24

  What works:

  • Hosts in VLAN 1 can ping the DG and access the internet
  • LAN 2 and 3 communicate with each other.  Hosts in VLAN2 (e.g. 10.1.2.2) can ping hosts in VLAN3 (e.g. 10.1.3.2) on the same switch
  • Hosts in VLAN 2 and 3 can ping to the IP of VLAN1 (10.1.1.1) interface

  What does not work:

  • Hosts in VLAN 2 and 3 cannot ping hosts in VLAN 1 on the same switch, or vice versa.
  • Hosts in VLAN 2 and 3 cannot even ping the DG.

  Yched blocks my post if I understand the config.  I'm sorry that I have to include it as an attachment.

  We have no information on the DG - what it is, how it is configured.  It is likely:

  1. unknown subnet vlan2 and vlan3 ranges.  Therefore can not to return packages for them.

  2. the default gateway for vlan1 customers is 10.1.1.2, so when customers vlan1 are trying to answer to vlan 2, 3, packets is directed to a DG, which probably ONLY has a default route to the Internet.

  3. once it is somehow solved (extra static on DG), Internet for vlan 2.3 will require same NAT rules with respect to the vlan 1.

• Virtual Guest tagging

  Hello

  I have a single ESX vSphere hosts I. I want to run 4 servers on a virtual pass and put each server on a separate VIRTUAL local area network. I have configured the VSwitch with VLAN 4095 for bindings and configured the physical switch as a trunk interface. Can somone guide me how to configure VGT then each VM on one VLAN separated? I know that I have to install the drivers etc, but that's all.

  The virtual computer is running Server 2008 x 32 with Service Pack 2.

  See you soon

  On the virtual switch, you will need to create separate virtual machines 4 port groups each with id vlan - you then connect the virtual machine to the computer virtual belgo-chinois port with the id of the vlan approriate.

  If you find this or any other answer useful please consider awarding points marking the answer correct or useful

• Problem of tagging VLAN

  I did some research on "best practices" networking and decided to test it on a cluster.

  (1) I have a group of ports vmotion the tag with a tag VLAN 30 on 2 ESX hosts

  (2) the port vmotion group is on its own subnet separate from anything else (10.0.2.0/24)

  (3) in the interfaces of contactors (Dell Powerconnect 6248) I'm going to ' linking IP subnet of VLAN "and link the VLAN 30 to 10.0.2.0/24

  I then try a vmotion, and it fails to 10%, most likely a problem with the network as guests are defined in/etc/hosts and times are synchronized.

  So, I delete the vlan tags, remove the link in step 3, and voila, vmotion work once more!

  Someone has any advice here to share on what went wrong? Perhaps more important still actually do I have a tag of vlan? Since the vmotion vmkernel is in his own vswitch and separate subnet, it seems that traffic is already entirely separate...

  (3) in the interfaces of contactors (Dell Powerconnect 6248) I'm going to ' linking IP subnet of VLAN "and link the VLAN 30 to 10.0.2.0/24

  You have a dedicated NETWORK card (or NIC) only for the VMotions?

  You will need to tag the switch port (or put it in the trunk and activate the VLAN30).

  At this point, do not use bind IP (is just to prevent impersonation).

  Try first to set the correct port - belonging to a VLAN.

  Also a vmkping between the two ports of VMotion could be useful for diagnosis.

  André

  * If you found this device or any other answer useful please consider awarding points for correct or helpful answers

• External Tagginng switch vs Virtual Switch Tagging

  Hello guys,.

  I'm really confused about these modes of two configurations and their uses / consequences.

  Say you have four natachasery and configure the vSwitches in the following way:

  • a vswitch with service console port group (vmotion) vmkernel port group and group of ports defined VM and four natachasery in annex

  All three services (SC, vmotion and vmtraffic) are in the same network (e.g.: 192.168.1.X), so all the natachasery is attached to the physical integrity go to this VLAN.

  In this scenario, I guess I'll use IS, right? I have to configure something in the physical switch (like the 4 natachasery trunking)? Or just nic teaming four cards in the vswitch network is enough? Or both?

  =======================================================================================================

  Now say you have 6 natachasery and configure the vSwitches in the following way:

  • a vswitch with defined service console port group and two natachasery in the annex

  • a vswitch with Group of ports vmkernel (vmotion) and two natachasery defined in annex

  • a vswitch with Group of vm ports and two natachasery defined in annex

  Each service has its own network, but now you have the production and DMZ VM.

  In this scenario, I guess I'll have to do the following (get ready cause its really confusing, at least for me):

  (1) set two NICs in the pswitch, firstly in the vlan management and in the nic vswitch team these two network cards. If you use felt

  (2) attach the second pair of NICs in the pswtich, in the vlan vmotion and nic vswitch team these two network cards. If you use felt

  (3) fix the last pair of network adapters in the pswitch to two ports that don't have any definied vlan on it and then to create two groups of ports in the vswitch: one for the VM of the production and the other for VM DMZ, marking with the right VLAN ID and nic team these two network cards. If you use the VST.

  Edit: I realized that I could simplify the second scenario, saying that the three services would be in the same vswitch with 6 natachasery attached to it, but with four networks. And fix these 6 cards in the pswitch with no VLAN defined in these 6 ports.

  As you can see, I'm pretty new in this kind of things, so, if I'm wrong to speak of something (or all), I'm sorry.

  I have attached two Dummies to try to be more clear.

  Excuse me for my English

  Post edited by: brian_plank

  In the first scenario, you are right.  No obligation to trunk.  On the other hand, I myself prefer to use trunks for all my connections, with all of my virtual local networks available on all of my trunks.  In this way, if I need to spend my autour natachasery, ever, I can do without the participation of network.  If you yourself control the network, then this isn't a problem.  Of course, this is not required, the way you have your first scenario presented will work fine.  And by the trunk, I mean a 802. 1 q trunk in terms of cisco, as opposed to a trunk in terms of HP, which would be an aggregation of links 802.3ad.

  In scenario 2, only the vSwitch vm network exchanges where you need multiple VLANs is where you need the trunk.  Make sure just that the VLAN native on this trunk is different.  In addition, you need to configure the ports as an access port (which means that the port will be part of a single VLAN) for the management VLANs, or a trunk with several port VLAN allowed.  Other than that, there should be no problem with VLAN marked and unmarked.  I use them all the time.

  -KjB

  VMware vExpert

• N3048 tagging VLAN

  Just recently, we bought a n3048 to replace our PowerConnect 6248 failure. The section belonging to a VLAN on the 6248 allows to tag the ports for VLAN specific in four States. An empty box for unconfigured, U for unidentified, T for the tag and F I believe is forbidden. The n3048 has only two States: white and U. Can someone explain how to have a law on the port in the same way it would on the 6248 has been T tag?

  You need to set the port in general or Trunk mode settings in order to Tag VLAN. Page 663 user guide begins detailing options and how they are defined.

  http://Dell.to/1wlbEn2

  See you soon

• VLAN Tag vlan vs unidentified

  I am running Dell Power Connect 5548 and 5524 in an arrangement of battery on 3 floors.

  I have a question on the Middle floor by which DHCP addresses are not to be issued to clients in vlan 90

  See below

  GFLOOR

  interface gigabitethernet1/0/48
  channel-group mode 1 on
  switchport mode general
  switchport general allowed vlan add 40,50,70,80,90 tag
  VLAN allowed switchport General add 1 unidentified

  interface gigabitethernet2/0/48
  channel-group mode 1 on
  switchport mode general
  switchport general allowed vlan add 40,50,70,80,90 tag
  VLAN allowed switchport General add 1 unidentified
  !
  Interface Port - Channel 1
  Description LAG_TO_TOP_FLOOR
  switchport mode general
  switchport general allowed vlan add 40,50,70,80,90 tag
  VLAN allowed switchport General add 1 unidentified

  1FLOOR

  interface gigabitethernet1/0/48
  channel-group mode 1 on
  switchport mode general
  switchport general allowed vlan add 40,50,70,80 tag
  VLAN allowed switchport General add 1.90 untagged

  interface gigabitethernet2/0/48
  channel-group mode 1 on
  switchport mode general
  switchport general allowed vlan add 40,50,70,80 tag
  VLAN allowed switchport General add 1.90 untagged

  interface gigabitethernet3/0/24
  switchport access vlan 50
  Interface Port - Channel 1
  Description LAG_TO_TOP_FLOOR
  switchport mode general
  switchport general allowed vlan add 40,50,70,80 tag
  VLAN allowed switchport General add 1.90 untagged

  I just need to tap 1Floor interfaces or should I take 90 off unmarked first, then add to marked subsequently

  switchport mode general
  switchport general allowed vlan add 40,50,70,80,90 tag
  VLAN allowed switchport General add 1 unidentified

  Thank you

  ANDY

  If that's the difference and the other works and the other is not then I suggest matching the configs on the floors.

  Is there a reason why, the floors are set up differently?

• Cisco ISE 1.3 - Mab authentication with a vlan for each foor

  Hello

  A client wants to implement authentication MAB with a vlan for each floor. I found a solution of Loïc

  I have set up the following:

  -the profile of different authentication with a vlan different.

  -Add the endpoint (printer etc) endpoint identity.

  -create endpoint group identity that end point of recall.

  -create a rule to authorizzation reminding all work and element... in the end.

  Do you know if there is a faster way where another way to solve the problem?

  Thank you all

  Well, mab in some environments, could be replaced by profiling and for rules, rather af with a rule authz for each floor, you can name your VLAN in your eponymous switches to "Printers", in the world, then you would only need an authz rule, where you use the name of the vlan instead of identification number, so no matter where this printer , it will end in the vlan 'Printer', whatever it is in this specific switch.

• SA520W VPN from Site to Site with several VLANs

  Hello

  I have a customer here with several VLANS in their places who wants to set up a VPN from Site to site between 2 devices SA520W. Unfortunately I can not find a way to set it up. In the VPN policy, I can choose between everything (which is not what I want, I want only traffict between subnets the routed via VPN), IP address unique, a beach (in a subnet) and a subnet itself - but only one. I don't find a way to configure several subnets in the selection of local traffic and remotely. Adding another IKE policy between the 2 sites does not either (which is good normally).

  Any ideas? Anything I'm doing wrong?

  Thank you for your help.

  Best regards

  Thomas

  I know that if you have an ASA or a router, you can define as VLANS to pass through the tunnel.

  Do not have access to a SA520W to test...

  A recommendation might be to post the question on the SMB community where they answered questions related to this product, just to check what other people did.

  Federico.

• SLES 11 sp3 /init.d/oracle with tags lsb

  Hi all

  I'm installing Oracle 11.2.0.4 on Sles 11 sp3.

  Now my linux administrator complains that there is no startup scripts etc/init.d/oracle.

  I found an old package with tags lsb orarun.rpm, but it is an old script.

  New script starting with lsb tags or some of you have made them?

  Kind regards

  Dave Strijbos

  Thanks, I found the tags LSB, that was the problem

  #! / bin/bash

  #

  #

  # /etc/init.d/oracle

  #

  #

  # BEGIN INIT INFO

  # Provides: oracle

  # Required startup: $network

  # Stop required: $network

  # Default - Start: 3 5

  # Default - Stop: 0 1 2 6

  # Description: Oracle database Startup Script

  # END INIT INFO

• When I uninstall an application virtualized with ThinApp does not eliminate the root folder, any suggestions to fix this?

  When I uninstall an application virtualized with ThinApp does not eliminate the root folder, any suggestions to fix this?

  Can you try to change the shortcuts = active on all entry Points setting?

  Change of Shortcuts=%Programs%\Check Point\Identity Shortcuts=%Programs%\IdentityAgent Agent

  In this way, we can see if it's the second folder level do. Because when I use only one file, I don't get the issue you reported.

  Out of curiosity:

  It is a Security Check Point Software? What is doing? It works like a ThinApp package?

• Re: Creating a page with tags

  Hello
  
  I create a page used with some fields of the tables.
  
  I created an employee table, but I did not insert all data.
  
  I created data controls and I do slip and fall some fields as text with tags.
  
  But the problem is when I run this page I get no input box where I need to enter the data.
  
  Can someone help me on why I don't get.
  
  Thank you & in what concerns:
  
  Pramila Padam

  Please check

  (1) DC are objects of entity, not unalterable view objects...
  (2) you did drag Input text within the shape of the ADF
  (3) try drag DC as an ADF with an Insert-create form and delete button