FX compared to FH of quality

Similar Questions

• EP 14 - menus DVD look at grain-y and poor quality even if the content of actual film seems well

  First Elements 14 - FILM and DVD MENU BURNING

  QUESTION #1: HELP!   I spent days and days trying to figure out why the DVD menus look so grain-y and poor quality even if the content of actual film seems well. I upgraded from 12 to 14 items first thinking that would improve the quality, but no luck.  I made my film with many segments video, titles, etc., fading in and out of the extra audio tracks. It all works very well.

  Then, when I select the Menu move and there the process... and the result... is simply unacceptable. I chose the "Pan and Zoom" model, even if I wanted to use my own background for the main Menu and the following menus images, because it was the only model with 6 thumbnails per page. I downloaded many sizes of different files and resolutions of my background images, thinking that this one would work.  I even found the original "Pan and Zoom". Model PSD files on my hard drive and checked the length of number of pixel and width, more inches in length and width, more DPI.

  Each of my own images (including one I formatted the exact size of the model "Pan and Zoom") looks a lot like pixelated, when I preview the movie... or actually make a DVD in first of 12 elements.  In the first 14 elements, burn a DVD does not even operate.  The disc resulting is not playable on any of my computers or DVD players.  It comes to my QUESTION #2.

  Is it possible to download a few screenshots to help you see what my poor quality menus looks like compared to the high quality film?

  I don't know what is happening with your DVD writer. It could be material, may be a driver, could be another program maintaining Premiere Elements to it. (Nero is famous for this).

  But if your DVD is burning as a file on your hard drive, then the program has done what it can. And you can easily use a free software called ImgBurn to burn DVD files to a disc. (As I noted in my books, this is the way I and a number of other publishers prefer to work for a number of reasons.)

  The program creates a VIDEO_TS folder on your D drive or if she has created an ISO file?

• Starkey Halo 2 streaming quality, compared to other devices (especially to the Muse / SurfLink Media 2)

  I am considering buying a pair of hearing aids Starkey Halo 2 - and an iPhone to chase them! Does anyone have comments on the audio quality when streaming to the iPhone?

  I am particularly interested in how it compares to what you would get with a pair of hearing aids Starkey Muse, streaming from a media 2 SurfLink (which is apparently better than you get with the Starkeys of the Z series because of an improved codec).

  Comparisons with other devices (for example, Widex Unique + TV - DEX, or Phonak Audéo V90 + ComPilot II) are also welcome.

  My audi has said no, BUT if you "hear" something different, please advise!  Looks like a real missed opportunity for me!

• Export of Adobe Media Encoder CC 2015 H.264, very poor quality compared to VLC

  Hello

  I do a few screencast with VLC Media Player (www.videolan.org, free and open source), it picks up my office and exports the file to H.264 format at 25 fps. Can I change this in the body and also to export the video in the H.264 format.

  All right, but... The original video files of VLC has a good quality with a very low rate (200 Kbps), and when I try to export the edited with the same flow of SOUL video, the quality is just horrible! Artifacts, fuzzy, with a few blocks... Even if I export with a rate over 20 times higher than the original file (4400 Kbps), the quality is not as good as the original.

  Here is a comparison between the export of three:

  

  Can you explain to me why there is a big difference even if the flow is multiplied by 20? Here are the settings of export (with a rate of 400 Kbps):

  

  Thank you very much for your help and please excuse my bad English

  Any time you take a highly compressed encoded video and then re - encode at such a low rate, it will look bad. In this case, your examples are not surprising at all.

  I don't know how VLC it coded in the first place (color space limited?), but I know that for some that you'll never get a good video performance with such a low flow and a high resolution - especially since you're re-encoding video already highly compressed.

  As a suggestion, regardless of your final settings, 2-pass encoding will give you a slightly higher quality for your budget to flow. 1 pass encoding in my experience is generally better for situations where you are not worried about bitrate, or when you need to code something quickly.

  Good luck with your efforts!

• The upgrade and image quality [compare the elements to Photoshop]

  Hello:

  I've been using 6 items (yes I know, pre-historic) to edit and organize my photos. My collection of items has about 2600 images. Time to upgrade and I am convinced that Lightroom is the way forward for the organization. My question is for the Assembly. Almost all of my editing has been managed by the elements basic stuff. I wonder if I need the full Photoshop provided with Creative Cloud.

  My first question is program Photoshop will produce a better quality in a picture if I did the same editing with my old Elements 6. There was an improvement in the image processing program?

  Notice please.

  Jim Rendos

  Hi Jim

  Camera RAW is certainly improved, the come of great change with PV2012 (process Version 2012 aka ACR 7) introduced with Photoshop CS6.  Other changes have been made to Camera RAW, and Lightroom even more, but their impact on the image quality is zero (AFAICR).  Of course, you'd have the same version of treatment with the recent versions of Lightroom if you take this route.

  The difference between PV2012 and PV2010 are noticeable in the shadow and highlight recovery.  Especially to hide him.  You remember produces bad artifacts setting shadows / highlights.  PV2012 allows you to push the bejazus from a RAW file while keeping things at least somewhere near sensitive.  I've always hated the shadows / highlights and could never understand the fuss people do about it.

  Who help me?

• Poor quality compared to compressor

  We organize tests in order to find the best way to export advertising to TV stations. Our editing workflow is slowly move to first Final Cut Pro. Of course, it makes sense to use SOUL for the encoding of the tasks of the Agency. However, with the same settings, our results are poor out of the SOUL from compressor. Here is a picture showing the two files h.264 encoded in the SOUL and the compressor. It is clear how the SOUL version is having problems of color in red text. It is a CBR 45 Mbps encoding with no investment automatic keyframe.

  

  

  One thing you could try doing the 23.976 p-> 29 .97i conversion before the encoding step and then tell the encoder to use full instead of interlaced images. He may be writing on an interlaced intermediate file that you interpret as progressive.

  I think H.264 encodes differently when you have fields. This is supposed to be a good thing, but the text on the image you show does not have any 'tearing' field, so interlaced encoding can be wrong it.

  On the other hand, I imagine that you will have other images which are not tear, and I wonder if those who will be adversely affected by progressive encoding.

• iPhone 7 more than the quality of his phone call

  We just got 2 new iPhone 7 more ' and I noticed that the audio quality of incoming calls on the two strange sounds.  I have the incoming of the distant sounds on the phone and Apple's leather case.  As he is coming from behind the phone or something.  Looks almost like the phone's speaker, but it is not.  The volume help a little but it seems turned off.  Previous, I had an iPhone 6 so I don't know how that compares to Plus 6.

  Any help is appreciated!

  Thank you!

  Hi there, Steven Fisher1!

  Thank you for joining the communities Support from Apple! Looks like you are having problems with the sound quality on the iPhone 7 more. I know how important it if of course the sound working properly at all times. Read this article here If you hear no sound or distorted sound of your iPhone, iPad or iPod touch President. This will give you some steps to try to get the problem taken care of.

  See you soon!

• Why the audio quality of Apple TV 4 film is so bad?

  I have my Apple TV (4th generation) hooked up to my receiver Pioneer Elite and the audio quality is very, very bad on all HD, its horrible movies. Everything is fine with my HDMI cable, receiver, or Apple TV. The volume is so low compared to the playback of a blu - ray movie or watch anything on television. When I watch a movie to iTunes HD on my Apple TV, I have to turn up the volume so much, but it does not increase the volume as it should. The audio is so different from a blu - ray movie, seems almost alive compared to watching a movie to iTunes on my Apple TV. Its really, really frustrating. Its almost unacceptable. Whats up, the poor audio quality? In most cases I pay more money for a movie to iTunes that the blu - ray of the same film. I expect the same or better quality audio.

  Sorry it's perfectly audible here, you do not have something to get lost with your installation or your equipment.

• The image quality of MacBook Air vs Pro

  Hello

  I just bought a MacBook Air 13 "and I got a MacBook Pro 13" (non-retine) till now.
  If I compare the image quality between Air and Pro there is a difference of contrast and sharpness of the colors. The monitors setting is the same on both Macs, the Air is even supposed to have high resolution (1440 x 900 instead of 1280 x 800, the MacBook Pro). Graphics card is Intel HD Graphics 6000 1536 MB vs 4000 in my MacBook Pro.

  Anyone know if there is a difference in both computers display technology, or if this could be a problem in my Macbook Air?

  THX in advance and best regards

  Products and specifications:

  MacBook Air (13 ", Anfang 2015)

  Intel Core i7 2.2 GHz

  8 GB 1600 MHz DDR3

  Intel HD Graphics 6000 1536 MB

  LCD display is different between Pro and Air. Don't know which group is better.

• How to improve the quality of the preview in Photos

  Recently, I started to use e/s of Photos in iPhoto. After having converted database of iPhoto in database of Photos, the quality of the preview of the Photos of that which is in iPhoto.

  However, when I imported new photos by map SD pictures, I found that the quality of the preview (small images) of newly imported photos image is extremely low compared to iPhoto. And when I click on the preview pictures of large size photos, it take some time to get clear pictures, not like iPhotos that can get clear pictures instantly.

  Is it possible to improve this situation. I already started to run out of iPhoto, but unfortunately, there is no update by Apple in the future.

  Please help with kindness.

  Is it possible to improve this situation. I already started to run out of iPhoto, but unfortunately, there is no update by Apple in the future.

  Using iCloud photo library?

  "With iCloud and optimize" storage "enabled, you will only seethe optimized versions, until the full original size has been downloaded from iCloud.

  In addition, the generation of previews takes awhile. It helps to keep the Photos during the night to get all the background treatment after you have imported new photos.

• CarPlay audio quality of the voice when it is connected through the USB port is poor vs Bluetooth on Pioneer AVH-4200NEX

  Hello!

  I recently installed a Pioneer AVH-4200NEX unit, I was super excited to improve my car with the support of CarPlay, and everything works great except for one thing.  When I connect my iPhone (6s +) to the unit via a USB cable and a standard phone call, the audio quality is very bad - hail, very downsampled, and metallic sounding compared to the use of Bluetooth via the unit to pioneer for the same phone call (I'm on LTE, using HD voice, although the quality difference is quite noticeable on the calls not HD and on the 4 G calls).  I looked for an answer to this question, but the best that I can find mention of limited USB bandwidth and try to juggle than the bandwidth for the rest of the CarPlay experience, although I don't buy not because audio via the iPhone connected with USB playback is just as clear that it is through Bluetooth.  So my question is: How can I submit a bug report Apple about this behavior and (b) do you have other CarPlay users also be known this recent problem on a unit of Pioneer NEX (AppRadio included)?  It would be great if this is a bug of Pioneer for which they can release a firmware update, I'm just worried that it is a codec problem specified by the CarPlay, so non repairable.

  Thank you!

  -Seth

  Hello served,

  Thank you for using communities of Apple Support.

  I understand that when you use the USB cable for your iPhone in your car with the audio CarPlay is mediocre. I know how it is important for you to hear your calls clearly. In a situation like this, I recommend the steps described in the following article to help solve the problem.

  Configure CarPlay to use with your iPhone

  Specifically the section to get help:

  Get help

  If CarPlay does not work as you expect, here's what you can check. After each step, try to use CarPlay again.

  1. Make sure that Siri is turned on.
  2. Restart your iPhone and your car. Depending on your car, you can see the CarPlay home screen when you turn it on. If you do not, look for the CarPlay logo on the screen of your car.
  3. If possible, connect your iPhone to a different USB port in your car.
  4. Try a different lightning to a USB cable. Make sure that the cable is certified.
  5. Update to the latest version of iOS.
  6. Check the manual using your car. You may need to install updates of firmware for your stereo.

  See you soon

• Bad sound quality

  I've been using Apple music on Android since last year and I also tested all the main services continuously looking for the one that fits for me. Here are my comments.

  Positive:

  1. the interface is pretty good
  2. playback of gapless albums works very well for me, a lot of competitors have problems with it, and it was important for me
  3 integration of own files works fine on my Xperia Z5, I had problems with this on Z1 Compact

  Negative:

  Sound quality. It is bad or even terrible, depending on the type of music. I don't think it's a matter of encoding. I think that Apple music flows in 256 kbps AAC (is this correct?), competitor g. MP3 320 kbps and 320 kbps OGG competitor s., I think. Thus, the difference in practice should be negligible, I think. But there is a huge difference in the listening experience.

  I use a Sony Z5 and headphones MDR-1ABT, which is quite a decent facility, and I love the sound of the G or S. The look is fantastic, bass is large and acute lovely, dynamic range is excellent. If I activate it Department HX from Sony on the phone that there is even better, it makes you go "wow". Everything just fantastic.

  Listening to the music of Apple experience is just the opposite. It looks like little in 1990s FM radio, the sound is extremely stable compared to G or S., the bass is very low, not sharp, flat. The application does not meet the parameters of its Android, there is therefore no equalizer and no HX Department. I can't listen to music of Apple for more than 15-20 minutes, when we know the sound quality of G or S, it's just not nice.

  Competitor T has the same question or 'feature' - the sound of Android settings are not respected by the app.

  So my question is, are there plans to fix it in the next release or 1.0, or should I rather build my playlists elsewhere? It will respect the sound of Android settings, like Equalizer / Clear Audio / Department HX? I like Apple interface and feel better and prefer to continue my subscription to Apple's music, but I can't stand the sound flat...

  See you soon

  Tom

  It seems very per device, Apple music on my HTC a M7 sound worse than my friends Samsung Galaxy that sounds like my iPhone.

  saying that Spotify does the same thing but google music sounds amazing...

• Satellite R630-13U - quality of the Webcam is not good

  Hello

  Toady, I just bought Satellite R630-13u and I tried to use the built-in webcam, but the quality is vey very poor, even in the right place of light. I tried to call my self through Skype iphone and my laptop, the quality of the image in the iphone is larger than the cell phone!

  I'll take the comture downtown sevirce to check that there should be some settings to adjust or a sticker placed on the camera where I can not remove it?

  your help is appreciated int his case

  concerned,

  Hello

  It's not easy to talk about the quality of the webcam without seeing and you shouln t compare the quality of the webcam with different products. The built-in webcam is very small compared to USB webcams or very practical cameras.

  But you can improve the quality of the webcam: I found an interesting article about it on the Forum from Toshiba:

  Internal bad quality of image when using the webcam in the Dim light
  http://APS2.toshiba-tro.de/KB0/TSB8A02G80000R01.htm

  How to change the settings for the built-in webcam If the image is very dark or black
  http://APS2.toshiba-tro.de/KB0/HTD9402LC0000R01.htm

• Quality mediocre speaker Tecra R10 - 10A

  Hello
  I just bought a tecra r10-10 has fills perfectly. My only complaint is an * extremely poor sound quality * fate of built-in speakers. I can't complain for lack of low frequencies, which is inevitable for this size, but distortion of severe clipping in the mid - hi freq range even with volume settings low.
  That's all just much worse than my old laptop of acer cheaper. You just can't listen to music.
  I also noticed that pressing tightly against the case on top the speakers I managed to remove a noisy ressons close to 2 kHz.

  I wonder if this quality is expected in a Tecra laptop sound system, if anyone of you could suggest me some kind of trick to avoid that (?)

  Thanks in advance

  Hello

  I think you are comparing the Tecra pregnant with external speakers or speakers Harman/kardon Qosmio X 300.
  Computers Tecra laptops are not designed for multimedia, and they aren't a top line entertainment system. The laptops are designed for daily use of work and office.

  A friend of mine has a Tecra laptop and he is very satisfied. The quality is perfect.

  Anyway, if you really think sound better that you should update the sound card drivers and check the sound settings. Maybe it's a bad active sound environment that causes this poor sound.

  Good luck!

• Satellite C660D webcam very poor quality

  Hello

  I bought my laptop 2 weeks ago and have only begun to use my webcam today.
  It is of very poor quality and flashes.
  What happens during the day in a good light as well when it's dark outside with light.

  My os is windows7 x 64.
  Yes, the plastic film is out of the front of it, I checked.
  I reinstalled the driver twice and is still the same poor quality.
  I restarted the process in both Device Manager.

  Please help I can't think of anything I can do.

  I put t know which model of laptop you have, but Satellite C660D has generally not HD cam but 0.3 M Pixcel camera only. And with this cam, you can't expect excellent image.

  There is nothing you can do. If the cam is installed properly, you can just try change the settings of the cam in the hope that the image will be a little better.
  When I compare 0, 3 m pixcel cam on old L300 and now 1.0 M (HD) Pxcel camera into my new P500 the difference is simply huge.