Satellite C660D webcam very poor quality

Similar Questions

• Satellite L755D - Webcam: very bad image quality?

  Hello @all,

  I have a SAT. 755 (OS: win7 64 bit). The webcam returns a very bad image quality and I noticed that the driver is from the year 2006 (Microsoft, Version 6.1.760.17514).

  I installied the last 'pilot' vom site of Toshiba (version 2.0.0.19), which actually just updated the CAM software.

  It is a fact, that this webcam is of very poor quality, or could someone please help me improve the photos, which are not only in poor Skype, but also when I just test the cam.

  Greetings from the Austria
  erkg1959

  Hello

  Please check the film in front of the lens is detached.
  I think that many models is delivered with a protective film in front of the goal and it is not too easy to do.

  See you soon!

  Tom

• Satellite L300 - 14G - Microphone volume of very poor quality

  Hello

  I have a satellite L300 - 14G. I would use a microphone.
  When I connect it to the front, the quality is very bad.

  If I pushed it there is a lot of background noise.
  If I don't push it I have to talk REALLY loud to make myself heard.

  Hello

  Using the external microphone?

  Please check the settings in the control panel-> Realtek HD audio Manager
  There is a tab named Microphone.

  You'll find called settings: acoustic echo cancellation and Noise Suppression.

  In addition, you can increase the volume of the microphone at a higher level.

  See you soon

• Re: Satellite Pro U400-130 poor quality display on external monitor

  Hello

  If I connect an external monitor to the display quality VGA port is quite poor. It looks like a 'grainy twinkle"(sorry hard to describe). I have tried several different monitors and made all the adjustments that I can find. If I increase the contrast to max is not visible, but still the screen is too bright. The internal TFT is perfect.

  Have you tried to change the display settings on monitor itself (brightness)?

  I have connected to my office two different external screens (19 and 22) to U400, and the image is OK. I really don't understand what makes you so unhappy.

• Export of Adobe Media Encoder CC 2015 H.264, very poor quality compared to VLC

  Hello

  I do a few screencast with VLC Media Player (www.videolan.org, free and open source), it picks up my office and exports the file to H.264 format at 25 fps. Can I change this in the body and also to export the video in the H.264 format.

  All right, but... The original video files of VLC has a good quality with a very low rate (200 Kbps), and when I try to export the edited with the same flow of SOUL video, the quality is just horrible! Artifacts, fuzzy, with a few blocks... Even if I export with a rate over 20 times higher than the original file (4400 Kbps), the quality is not as good as the original.

  Here is a comparison between the export of three:

  

  Can you explain to me why there is a big difference even if the flow is multiplied by 20? Here are the settings of export (with a rate of 400 Kbps):

  

  Thank you very much for your help and please excuse my bad English

  Any time you take a highly compressed encoded video and then re - encode at such a low rate, it will look bad. In this case, your examples are not surprising at all.

  I don't know how VLC it coded in the first place (color space limited?), but I know that for some that you'll never get a good video performance with such a low flow and a high resolution - especially since you're re-encoding video already highly compressed.

  As a suggestion, regardless of your final settings, 2-pass encoding will give you a slightly higher quality for your budget to flow. 1 pass encoding in my experience is generally better for situations where you are not worried about bitrate, or when you need to code something quickly.

  Good luck with your efforts!

• Poor quality of the sound in the timeline and export; very well in the Source?

  Hi all.

  Newbie-Pr but experienced pro audio digital. I am confused and I know I am missing just something somewhere.

  I made a video for one of my songs. The graphics are quite (in AE), imported Pr and everything what is superb. I import the final audio mix and it sounds very poor quality when played the chronology and the final output, regardless of the format (I tried several presets and custom as well settings). I played a bit and noticed that the audio sounds fine when played in the Source window inside the Prime Minister.

  The session of Pr is comrised of 18 video tracks (not all playing at the same time, of course) and a stereo audio track.

  I tried to re - export audio from logic to depths of different bits, sampling frequencies and formats of file (mp3, wav, AAC, etc.) but the results are the same each time: Source (Pr) sounds very good, logic output sounds very well made / reading of the timeline looks very bad quality mp3 and produces final sounds just as bad.

  I tried everything I can think of. I hope one of you can show me what I'm missing.

  TIA!

  Mark

  First Pro CC

  Processor 2 x 2.8 GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon

  Memory 8 GB 800 MHz DDR2 FB-DIMM

  Graphics  ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT 256 MB

  Software  OS X 10.9.1 (B 13, 42)

  Thanks for the reply!

  I lived the same results, no matter what I used the export settings. In addition, the poor quality of the sound was present in the timeline itself, without even exporting the project.

  Finally, I lifted my hands, has launched a completely new project, the same audio file in drugs... sounded good. Copied / pasted the video clips in the project original, broken and boom, everything is fixed. Yes, corrupted file Pr, it turns out. All I had to do was start a new project and import all the old components.

  I had to do that in logic a lot (more and more these days). I wish just that I had tried 10 hours earlier! HA.

  Anyway, problem solved and many thanks!

• Camileo X 200: poor quality using Slow Motion

  When I select function Slow Motion (snail) the image is of very poor quality and with noise.
  It's as if the camera was defective.

  Would it be useful?

  + Why don't I have a "fuzzy picture" on my camera, Camileo? +
  http://APS2.toshiba-tro.de/KB0/OPT0602Y40000R01.htm

  Check if Macro-mode' is enabled. In this case, disable this.

• Mark jump Hard Case BlackBerry blackBerry 10 poor quality

  When I bought my jump was disappointed by the lack of protection cases available, even not an otter box option. So I went with the BlackBerry brand flex shell case. Very poor quality, I love you design with the stand, but I have less than 3 months the plastic cracked in the corners or the stand broke. What are my coverage options? I have I very disappointed.

  Hi @El1007891

  I'm sorry that you had a bad experience

  If you do not already have to discuss coverage options, you must contact your point of sale.

  Thank you!

• Poor quality PDF problem revisited.

  A week or two ago I posted a problem I had with the PDF text of very poor quality (on screen) Although the print settings high quality with built-in fonts. I am running Windows 7 Professional, producing the document in Corel draw X 3, and Acrobat X 10.1.0.

  I have not solved this problem, but I continued the development of the document. At one point I got a PDF output for purposes of evidence and I found that fonts look sharp and as I expect. Then I loaded the previous document with fonts of poor quality for the purposes of comparison. The old document now also went well! I checked in Acrobat and the two documents was incorporated Callibri police. However the next time that I produced a pdf file of the quality of the police was bad again. I copied the two PDF files to a memory stick and checked on several other computers running Acrobat reader. They all went well. I then printed the PDF currently running on the computer with a low resolution and it printed with very large fonts. I've experimented with different levels of zoom and the fonts look poor little matter I do.

  It seems that poor policies are specific to the computer on which I run Acrobat pro and also appears that this problem is intermittent. I looked through various settings in Acrobat pro that can affect the appearance of the font, but I was not able to identify the source of the problem.

  Any suggestions?

  Thank you

  Murray

  You probably need to go to the preferences and turn on anti-aliasing in the display preferences. This provides a better representation of images and fonts on a LCD (which most are today).

• All the fonts that come out very low quality

  Hey all,.

  I'm having a problem and I think that I may have inadvertently changed a setting in Pohotoshop CS3.  What happens is that when I'm dealing with images (width and height) 1000px or less, all my fonts go out in very poor quality, almost square.  I do not know what setting allows to set this, but it just started happening recently.  Here is a screenshot of an image 900px wide of text, 300pix /: http://imgur.com/TD864

  I would appreciate help.

  Check your anitaliasing, mine is set to high in this screenshot. You must switch to the type tool to access anti-aliasing.

  

• Photoshop EPS appearing very low quality in Illustrator

  I have a Photoshop document with raster images and vector text.  Hoping to preserve the sharpness of the text, I saved the document as a photoshop EPS. When I reopen the file in Photoshop, everything looks OK. However, when I open the file in Illustrator, the image is very poor quality and the colors are off too, much darker. The colors are OK once I select 'Preview overprinting' but it is pixelated. I'll just save in TIFF format as a solution, but I'm just very curious, why this EPS appears as such poor quality in Illustrator.

  
  Thanks for your comments.

  EPS is a flat file format.

  Save as .psd and place in artificial intelligence. You have not need of any other format, but if you really want to use something else that .pdf .psd can best yoru next option.

• Regrowth problem: very bad quality of the text

  Hi, thanks for taking the time to read my question.

  I am just familiarize themselves with CS5 and were very excited to try the new feature 3D regrowth, BUT when I do the text is of very poor quality, judge for yourself:

  

  Or: http://i755.photobucket.com/albums/xx195/eXqutr/Quality.png

  I use a new laptop, I bought it at the beginning of the summer.

  TECHNICAL DATA:

  OS: Windows 7 Home Premium 64-bit

  Processor: Dual Core Intel Core processor i3 - 350 M (2.26 GHz, 3 MB L3 Cache)

  Graphics card: ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5430 (512 MB)

  Memory: 4 GB (2 DIMMs) DDR3 system memory

  HARD drive: 500 GB at 5400 RPM or hard drive hard drive 500 GB-7200 RPM

  Display: 15.6 "diagonal high definition HP LED BrightView (1366 x 768)

  If there is any other information that could help, let me know. Thank you in advance.

  -Metin k.

  Hi Metin,

  What are your see is the quality setting interactive for rendering (without anti-aliasing). If you want to see the smooth contours change render settings > quality: to Ray Traced (draft or Final).

  http://help.Adobe.com/en_US/Photoshop/CS/using/WS9895072D-F6CF-4C39-B28B-D8B49769DF1A.html

  

  Kind regards

  Steve

• Web cam on Satellite L350 photo quality is very poor

  Hello
  My webcam is not ok, its very bad quality and I tried to change everything in the settings.
  Please help me :)

  Why do you think that's bad?
  Have you compared the quality with some other cam?

• Satellite C660D - 10 d - low resolution of the webcam

  My computer is a Toshiba Satellite C660D - 10 d with Windows 7. I bought it 6 months ago and at first my webcam worked fine, with a resolution of 640. Now, the webcam image is very blurry, the resolution is only 320 * 240 and I can't change it, because it's the only option. I reinstalled the driver, but the problem is always the same.

  What can I do about it?

  Hello

  The laptop supports a 0.3 M pixel webcam and image formats supported are:
  160 X 120, 176 X 144, 320 X 240 (QQVGA), 352 X 288, 640 X 480 (VGA)
  You can also save the movie in 320 x 240 and 640 x 480.
  So as you can see the hardware supports higher resolution.

  I have no idea why the other values are locked maybe something wrong in the registry or similar

  I have even if the new installation of the webcam software could fix this, maybe you should uninstall the webcam software first and then recommended to clean the registry with CCleaner and then might install the software once more if in the worst case you will need to reinstall the operating system

• Satellite C660D-14W - Webcam application: Impossible to adjust the Image Preview size

  I recently bought a Satellite C660D-14W, and then activation of the application of the webcam, I can't increase the size of the image of 160 * 120.

  The size of the image (i.e. the image of myself I see when the webcam is activated) used to be much larger, but when I select the drop-down list menu resolution to see that I can enlarge the preview image, the only option I gave is 160 * 120.

  A couple of times before this problem started, when I started the laptop I got an error message saying that the application of the webcam could not be enabled; I've uninstalled and reinstalled the driver for the webcam, but no luck.

  Any help would be appreciated.

  Best wishes

  Andy

  Hello

  Even if reinstalling driver webcam didn t help you, I would recommend when even that check once more.
  You must uninstall the first webcam software!

  Then you must clean the registry because the registry still contains entries.
  You can use the CCleaner it s clean good software keep the register and the OS.

  After that, restart the device several times and then download the software of the webcam from the Toshiba page then install it and restart the device.
  Now check the features of webcam!

  Note: to install 3 software (Skype, etc.) that may affect the webcam feature to verify the webcam before install you the software.