Generate the DDL

During the generation of DDL, are we suppose to select the PUBLIC and MDSYS under assigned users.

Why they are listed, and when we're supposed to select.

Thanks in advance.

Kind regards

Zafar

Hi zak,.

These DDL generation options are important if you have associated objects (for example, Tables or Types structured) with PUBLIC or MDSYS users in your physical model.

If you expand these nodes in the dialog generation DDL, it will show the objects that have been associated with these users and allow you to select whether to include these items in the generation of DDL.

Kind regards

David

Tags: Database

Similar Questions

  • Generate the DDL to create the table in the database

    Hi all

    I want to create the new fact and Stadium as being under the statement:

    (1) in the designer, access the models > Oracle BI Applications (folder) > (model) Oracle BI Applications > done (sub-model) step, right click on the WC_SAMPLE_FS data store and select duplicate the selection.

    2) double-click the new data store, and then rename it. Name and resource name must match the name of the actual table. Alias can be the same or greater value easy to use.

    (3) in the sub-tab of the columns, add all columns.

    (4) repeat the same steps to create the fact Table by copying the data store WC_SAMPLE_F under the submodel of "facts".

    (5) for the fact table, define the type of OLAP to "fact Table.

    (6) generate the DDL to create the table in the database.

    In step 6, I don't know where and how to generate the DDL to create the database table. Please help me. If you have another tutorial with screenshot, please share with me. Thank you.

    Kind regards

    Cong

    Hi Cong,

    Please see section 6.3 DDL generation of scripts in this link:

    Working with the Designer of the common Format - 11g Release 1 (11.1.1)

    I hope this helps.

    Thank you!

    Saran.

  • How to generate the ddl for unlimited quota

    Hi all

    DB: Oracle 9.2.0.4
    OS: Solaris 8

    I have a 12 tablespaces and 18 users of the application.
    I would like to grant an unlimited quota for all users on all areas of storage, to find out how to generate the ddl script.

    ex: change the dataagent user quota unlimited on DSOM.

    can anyone help us.
    Thank you
    KK.

    All users in all areas of storage?

    Select "edit user" | user name | "quota unlimited on | nom_tablespace | ';'
    from dba_users cross join dba_tablespaces
    When not in dba_tablespaces.tablespace_name ('SYSTEM', "SYSAUX");

    Please, be careful with this

    HTH
    Antonio NAVARRO

  • Generate the DDL - change is a new column and I want to generate an alter table.

    All, morning

    I searched and searched all over the Data Modeler and I can't find this option... but I found it easily in the designer.
    I hope you can help me.

    V3.0.0.665 SQL Developer Data Modeler.

    I added a new column to a table, and when I generate the DDL I wish it were an alter table add column rather than a table to create.
    This feature is in the designer, so I think it would be in the Data Modeler.

    Just in case my description isn't clear, here are the high level steps, then it is clear.

    1 create logic model
    2. create the relational logic.
    3. create the physical relationship.
    4 generate the DDL and run in the database. At this point, I'm going to production with my system, and all right.
    5. at this point, we have an enhancement request. For the model, it will be a new column in a table.
    6. update of the logic model.
    7. relational update logic
    8 physical update of relational
    9 generate the DDL. Here, I would have generate it know that it needs to generate an alter table add column and does not create the table.
    This is something I do a lot as all my models are in production. I can't find how to do this step to get data Modeler to generate the altar.
    Designer done exceptionally well.

    Quite often, it is more than a single column. Changes can be many and made over time and at the time of generating the DDL you remember not every single amendment. To have the tool discover these changes for you and generate the appropriate DDL is a feature that I consider as very high.

    I hope that is clear and you can help me.

    See you soon
    Chris...

    Hi Chris,

    you need to compare your model on database - database relational model even import and use the option 'swap target' - in this case 'expressions of alter' against the database will be generated.
    You can watch demonstrations here http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/developer-tools/datamodeler/demonstrations-224554.html
    It would probably be more useful http://download.oracle.com/otn_hosted_doc/sqldev/importddl/importddl.html
    Sooner or later your changes will require the table to be recreated, and you will need to backup your data - you can consider using the 'Advanced DDL' option - script is generated that will land your table content (including LOBs) to the system of files accessible from the database and restore after changes. Well not try directly on the production system :).

    Philippe

  • Please indicate how to generate the DDL trigger by using the Server Explorer view

    I can't find the place to click to generate the DDL for the triggers. Nor can I see where are my triggers. Is this supported?

    Hello

    Right click on the table that you want to trigger, click Add trigger. Expand the nodes under the table and you'll find triggers here.

    It will be useful,
    Greg

  • Generate the DDL in separate files

    Hello

    During extraction of the code using SDDM with Generate DDL-> generate DDL in separate files, SDDM generates files to sql script for the tables, views, sequences, packages etc. as schema_name.object_name.sql

    Is there a setting in preferences where we can change this behavior for generating names of file with object_name.sql right

    Please let me know if this is possible in SDDM

    Kind regards

    Zafar

    I don't think there is arrangement that allows the user to change what the name of the file will look like.

    But I think that why schema_name is used in the scripts generated sql, since all the scripts for the tables of all schemas are generated in the same directory of table, and can the same table name exists in more than one scheme.

    Also, by looking at the name of the file, we can identify who owns the table.

    If anyone has other reasons better please add your comment

    Kind regards

    Zafar

  • Generate the ddl to create materialized view log...

    Hi gurus...

    Oracle db: 11g

    I am trying to generate / excerpt from script MVIEW Logs from prod to be applied on the test.
    I tried
    < code >
    DBMS_METADATA. GET_DDL (decode(object_type,'materialized_view_log'), object_name, owner)
    from dba_objects
    where owner = < ABC >;
    < code >

    above fails, any ideas?

    Thank you

    >
    Oracle db: 11g

    I am trying to generate / excerpt from script MVIEW Logs from prod to be applied on the test.
    I tried

    dbms_metadata.get_ddl(decode(object_type,'materialized_view_log'), object_name, owner)
    from dba_objects
    where owner=;

    above fails, any ideas?
    >
    Please try to use the tags in code, but you need to add.

     on the line before and the line after your code instead of what you are using.
    
    The object type names are case-sensitive so you need to use
    

    DBMS_METADATA. GET_DDL ('MATERIALIZED_VIEW_LOG', object_name, owner)

    Why are you using DECODE?                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                    
    
  • Improvement to generate the DDL

    For 3.1, I would like to suggest a feature to save the settings to generate. For each generation, I have to go through and mark what I generated, ignored, name substitution, etc.

    Thank you
    Gary

    Hi Gary,.

    Thanks for your suggestion. I connected an improvement on that request.

    David

  • synchronize data dictionary with the model does not generate the DDL

    Hello

    I followed the instruction from the link below

    Re-engineering of your database by using the Data Modeler 3.1

    Here's what I did.

    1. the tables imported using import-> MS SQL 2012 data dictionary (used jDTS 1.3.1)

    2. Add new column to one of the imported tables of the Data Modeler

    3. click on synchronize data dictionary button

    4. compare the contextual model poster! indicating there is gap, but the DOF Preview button is disabled.

    Would you advise me what I got wrong?

    Best,

    Yong

    MODIFY the script is only supported for Oracle databases.

  • Delete the rule not generated by DDL

    Hello

    I use SQL Developer Data Model (Version 3.1.1.703) and experience the following issue:

    I have a table with a foreign key and a delete rule 'SET NULL'. However if I generate the DDL for "SQL Server 2005" then the rule is not there. Only if I change the rule of "CASCADE" then it is generated correctly. Is this a bug or am I missing something?

    Thanks in advance for your help,
    Michael

    Hi Michael,

    Thanks for your comments. I logged on that bug.

    Philippe

  • MView delta deploy problem between SDDM schema and db (Swap models target dictionary import) - overview of the DDL generation

    Hello

    I'm having a hard time to reverse the difference between my role model and my fusion database schema.

    The initial goal is simple:

    1 / detect differences in metadata

    2 / I SDDM to generate the DDL change code

    (if possible, if not, recreate, reload: powerful existing featured BTW)

    3 / deploy

    4 / check/confirm that no more delta existing

    I do this:

    * menu file > import > dictionary

    * Select connection

    * Select the db schema

    * check the "Swap target model.

    * Select MY_MVIEW > next (TABLE 1 DB object to import) > finish (work "Generate Design")

    * in the model comparison window, I have to deselect everything, less table MY_MVIEW AND also MY_VIEW Materialized View

    (as they appear as 2 SDDM objects)

    DOF Preview button

    I see:

    -comments created in first place (whereas the MVIEW should be recreated)

    which is smaller but still blurs the legibility

    -MY_MVIEW is systematically recreated

    (how many times already I deploy)

    I figured out:

    . SDDM objects tables (disorders, implemented in the MVIEW form) and host MVIEW (Physics) the query independently

    . even if I sync them manually (copy - paste), DDL deployed code is not strictly identical to

    So it may have to do with a dysfunction compare?

    SDDM is full of options to desensitize compares (physical exclusion, storage, etc.), but I found no way to simply compare and align MVIEWs

    (and the documentation is rare on the subject)

    Any clue?

    THX

    Interesting.  Looks like you're it's partitioning that is causing the problem.

    In a model, partitioning information can be held on the objects of physical model for Tables and materialized views.

    In the case where a Table and materialized views are linked together (by the implementation as a Materialized View on physical model Table property), it is information of partitioning that is held on the Table which is relevant.  The information on the Table is used when generating DDL.  And in an import or synchronize, partitioning information are added to the Table object.

    I think that what is happening in your case probably is your model includes some details of partitioning maintained on the Materialized View object.

    Synchronization is combining the details of your database partition to the Table in the model.

    As it does not associate the details of partition of your database with the materialized view in the model object, the comparison shows a difference for the materialized view:-not partitioned in database, but partitioned in your model.  And this difference is causing the drop and re-create the view materialized in the DDL.

    There are various options to work around this:

    1. you can remove details unnecessary partitioning and maintained on the view materialized in your model object.

    2. you can clear the check box for the entry for materialized views in the tree in the dialog box models to compare before making the DOF preview.  (But it also means that no DDL will be generated for all other differences in these materialized views).

    3. you can use the filter properties to filter the relevant properties (e.g., partitioned, partitioning columns and Subpart columns for Materialized View objects), and then select the button refresh trees before performing the DOF preview.  (See the screenshot below).

    David

  • [SOLVED] Export Oracle SQL Data Modeler is missing a PRIMARY KEY on the DDL script

    I use data 4.1.888 maker to create an ER diagram and generate a DDL her script.

    The diagram contains more than 40 paintings, most of them have a primary key defined.

    For some reason any there is a table that has a primary key defined, but which is ignored when I export the model to a DDL script.

    It is the "wrong" key (even if it is checked that it is not found on the generated DDL script):

    4faS5.png

    This is where the key is set:

    O5mPb.png

    And it is the preview of the DDL (Yes, primary key up there shows):

    SrwMu.png

    This is what happens if I try to generate the DDL for just this (still not generated primary key) table:

    MljUm.png

    Has anyone had the same problem? Any ideas on how to solve it?

    There is no error in the log file, but when I run the generated DDL script there, and then I realized that I was doing something wrong:

    The table MEMBERS had a mandatory foreign key from another table, which in turn had a mandatory key against MEMBERS himself.

    So even if I could generate this primary key on members myself, and then run the the constraint definition that returned an error on the DDL script, I could not perform an insert operation on any of these two tables because of the constraint.

    I revised my design and realized relationships was not mandatory. I unchecked the mandatory box on the definition of the constraint and everything went well.

    I could reproduce the problem and the solution on a diagram with only two tables, so I'm sure that's it.

    Anyway, the Data Modeler is "a failed" silently in this kind of situation. It should be fairly obvious to an experienced designer that I was doing something wrong, but it is not so obvious when you deal with dozens of tables and all their relations and this is your first time using the Modeler.

    Thanks for your reply :-)

  • Remove the automatic sequence and trigger the DDL for surrogate keys?

    Is there a way to remove the shutter and the sequence of creation for surrogate keys when export file DDL?

    I know that most of the time the auto sequence and trigger creation is welcome and very convenient.

    However I'm migrating from an old model of Designer and here only the necessary sequences are created.

    They have a different name and logical trigger is personalized (and generated outside of the Designer).

    There is a lot of code package accordingly. So, I prefer to create and use different sequences.

    Is there a way to do this? Tips are welcome. Create

    Hello

    you change preferences - "Data Modeler > model > physics > Oracle"-set "Default auto-increment DDL" and "Identity default DDL" voices against ZERO and generate the DDL for Oracle12c


    Philippe

  • How to get the DDL to sqlplus as the TOAD

    Hello

    I have to work on a computer terminal for a client where the TOAD is not installed. For my regular activities of s/n, I need to take the DDL several times.
    I'm very used to the style of the DDL scripts that TOAD 9.6.x.x gives to any object in a schema.

    Can anyone suggest how I can get exactly TOAD - like scripts (which provide not only the create statements)

    For example

    * 1. sqlplus from when I *.
    Select dbms_metadata.get_ddl ('TABLE', 'APE1_ACCUMULATORS') of double;

    I only get the bottom

    CREATE THE TABLE XLTDBO92. APE1_ACCUMULATORS
    (
    CYCLE_CODE NUMBER 4 APE1ACCU_CYCLE_CODE_NN CONSTRAINT NOT NULL,.
    CYCLE_INSTANCE NUMBER (2) CONSTRAINT APE1ACCU_CYCLE_INSTANCE_NN NOT NULL,
    CUSTOMER_SEGMENT NUMBER 4 APE1ACCU_CUSTOMER_SEGMENT_NN CONSTRAINT NOT NULL,.
    CUSTOMER_ID NUMBER (9) CONSTRAINT APE1ACCU_CUSTOMER_ID_NN NOT NULL,
    ACCUM_TYPE_ID NUMBER (9) CONSTRAINT APE1ACCU_ACCUM_TYPE_ID_NN NOT NULL,
    OWNER_ID
    )

    * 2. of TOAD 9.6.x.x but when I click on 'create scripts' I'll get *.

    DROP TABLE XLTDBO92. APE1_ACCUMULATORS CASCADE CONSTRAINTS;
    CREATE THE TABLE XLTDBO92. APE1_ACCUMULATORS
    (
    CYCLE_CODE NUMBER 4 APE1ACCU_CYCLE_CODE_NN CONSTRAINT NOT NULL,.
    CYCLE_INSTANCE NUMBER (2) CONSTRAINT APE1ACCU_CYCLE_INSTANCE_NN NOT NULL,
    CUSTOMER_SEGMENT NUMBER 4 APE1ACCU_CUSTOMER_SEGMENT_NN CONSTRAINT NOT NULL,.
    CUSTOMER_ID NUMBER (9) CONSTRAINT APE1ACCU_CUSTOMER_ID_NN NOT NULL,
    ACCUM_TYPE_ID NUMBER (9) CONSTRAINT APE1ACCU_ACCUM_TYPE_ID_NN NOT NULL,
    OWNER_ID
    )

    DROP SYNONYM XLTDB92. APE1_ACCUMULATORS;

    CREATE SYNONYM XLTDB92. APE1_ACCUMULATORS FOR XLTDBO92. APE1_ACCUMULATORS;


    GRANT DELETE, INSERT, SELECT, UPDATE ON XLTDBO92. APE1_ACCUMULATORS TO XLTDBO92_ALL;


    So my question is:
    How to such scripts from sqlplus, regardless of the type of the object? _


    Note: I'm writing a new thread because my previous question has been answered, even if I was not able to type in completely. My mistake as it was published in before that I could finish the question.

    Regds,
    Malika

    If the DDL returned by dbms_metadata isn't to your liking, then write your own scripts to generate the DDL or cover scripts to generate all the items you want.

    In the case of synonyms and grants, is very easy using the RDBMS dictionary views, but if you generate a table DDL you also want and need the PK, UK, FK, secondary indexes, comments and policies on the table as well as synonyms and subsidies. All that if you delete the tables goes.

    There is a get_dependent_ddl dbms_metaddata of procedure to generate objects dependend on a table that can be interesting.

    HTH - Mark D Powell.

  • Data Modeler - change the DDL table instructions

    I am trying to add a new foreign key and a column to a table which already exists in the database. I generate the DDL Data Modeler but I can't change the declaration for the new column.

    How we prevent data Modeler to generate the DDL that change of name of table in < table_name > _bcp / delete the table and then re-create the table?

    I don't want to create a backup table and I don't want to delete and re-create the original table to add a column. In fact I can't even delete the table due to the other tables that refer to it.

    So it is possible to change the declaration of DDL generation instead of the drop and create statements?

    the reason for this is schema - uncheck ' property usage pattern in compare features "in" General Options > DDL.

    Philippe

Maybe you are looking for

  • I can't find the Fox for the custom personas option menu.

    I want to wear my own character customized to my firefox browser, nut, I just can't find the Fox that they speak. Quote: "Option 1: Test on your own computer. In the Personas menu in the bottom left of the status bar of the browser, you can activate

  • Impossible to pass to el capatin

    How do EL Capatin when you run 10.6.8? When I try to upgrade im says that cant upgrade has completed on this computer. 2009 macbook 2.1

  • Recover erased pictures/movies from a digital camera?

    I have a digital camera Canon Ixus850 with a 2 GB SD card. is it possible to retrieve deleted pictures/movies of her? Thanks for any help.

  • Encoding methods

    My project is mounted up, and more, 100 files, I start to worry if my drawing is too complex for a blackberry application. My current project works: -Home Main (Contains the main methods to start the program) Debugger (Provides a custom behavior for

  • Microsoft Authenticode (tm) root is necesssary?

    My computer which is new has a code that shows valid as soon as the: 01/01/1995 to 31/12/1999, and you can also read this certificate has expired or is not yet valid. Is this a problem