Group by clause

Hello

You can use group by clause with COUNT function...

In the reports, I have to count the stattus data_set group... If I use COUNT (data_set), it gives me 2 different ranks

1 for the race and the other to succeed.

Please help me...

Thank you

RS

I'm able to do. I used the formula below:

COUNT (CASE WHEN "Status". ("Employment status" = 'Succeed' THEN 1 END)

even for running status and on the other and it works very well...

Tags: Business Intelligence

Similar Questions

  • Doubts formidable wrt "select", "join" and "group by" clause to calm a while...

    Dear all,

    Kindly advise on below 2 doubts which have been daunting for quiet some time. The bottom has forced our requests to take alternative routes to receive solutions.

    Doubt 1) is it possible for us to use 'select (*)' with a group and a join clause, if we have at least 2/3 tables with minimum 15-20 columns... given the constraint of having to add all the names column in the group by clause.

    Question 2) is it possible to use "select" (*) with the exception of a single column of the table?
    That is to say, I hate the output of a statement select (*) to have the entire field except a field in a table

    Ask your advisor for the same thing. Excuse me because I have no examples to illustrate this point in time. A successful idea will do.

    Thank you and best regards,

    Séverine Suresh

    Hey, Sebastian,

    Séverine Suresh - 3035408 wrote:

    Dear all,

    Kindly advise on below 2 doubts which have been daunting for quiet some time. The bottom has forced our requests to take alternative routes to receive solutions.

    Doubt 1) is it possible for us to use 'select (*)' with a group and a join clause, if we have at least 2/3 tables with minimum 15-20 columns... given the constraint of having to add all the names column in the group by clause.

    Sure.  If you had problems, you did it wrong.  Your postal code, examples of data (CREATE TABLE and INSERT statements) and the results desired from these data.

    Check out the Forum FAQ: Re: 2. How can I ask a question on the forums?

    Normally, you don't want to ' SELECT *...» "in a join.  Are most joins are equijoins, ' SELECT *...» "produced 2 copies of / columns used for Assembly.  In addition, many tables have columns (for example, modified_date) that are not necessary in most applications.

    All columns must be included explicitly in a GROUP BY clause. You cannot use * it.

    You can not have parentheses around the * in ' SELECT *...» ».  You might think 'SELECT COUNT (*) '

    Question 2) is it possible to use "select" (*) with the exception of a single column of the table?
    That is to say, I hate the output of a statement select (*) to have the entire field except a field in a table

    ...

    No.; If you don't want a particular column in the result set, you cannot use "SELECT *...» ».

    Your front end can have so as not to display a column in the result set.  For example, in SQL * more:

    COLUMN modified_date NOPRINT

    means that you won't see any column called modified_date.

  • How to INSERT a SELECT statement with a GROUP BY clause on a table with an IDENTITY column?

    n an application, I intend to truncate and insertion on a 12 c Oracle database, but have found this problem with a IDENTITY column. Even if the INSERT... SELECT statement works on most SELECT uses I tried, if this statement was also a GROUP BY clause, it does not work, delivering a "ORA-00979: not a GROUP BY expression ' complaint. Some examples of code:

    create table aux ( owner_name varchar2(20), pet varchar2(20) );  
    

    insert into aux values ('Scott', 'dog'); 
    

    insert into aux values ('Mike', 'dog'); 
    

    insert into aux values ('Mike', 'cat'); 
    

    insert into aux values ('John', 'turtle');  
    


    

    create table T1 (
    

      id number generated always as identity,
    

      owner_name varchar2(20),
    

      pet_count number ); 
    

    select owner_name, count(*) as pet_count from aux group by owner_name; -- works just fine
    

    insert into T1 (owner_name, pet_count) select owner_name, count(*) as pet_count from aux group by owner_name; -- doesn't work

    The select statement works by itself, but it fails as an INSERT... SELECT statement.

    Appreciate the help!

    Looks like a bug. You must open the SR with Oracle. Meanwhile, you could materialize select:

    SQL > insert into T1 (owner_name, pet_count)
    2 with t as (select / * + materialize * / owner_name, count (*) as pet_count to the owner_name group)
    3. Select owner_name, pet_count t
    4.

    3 lines were created.

    SQL > select * from t1;

    ID OWNER_NAME PET_COUNT
    ---------- -------------------- ----------
    1 John                          1
    Scott 2 1
    3 Mike                          2

    SQL >

    Keep in mind index THAT MATERIALIZE is undocumented.

    SY.

  • -SQL - GROUP BY clause: fields of nonaggregate mandate

    Hello

    I study data (especially data recovery) and found something interesting.

    When you use an aggregate function in the SELECT clause, it is mandatory to have all fields that are not aggregated in the SELECT clause to be there in the GROUP BY clause.
    For example,.

    SELECT dept_no, Salary
    The EMPLOYEE
    GROUP BY dept_no;

    The SQL above works fine.
    But what happens if the user forgets the dept_no in the GROUP BY clause or the clause GROUP BY itself is missing?
    Certainly, it is a mistake.

    Why this error is not handled by the database. I mean, the database must be smart/pretty smart to add the GROUP BY clause by itself. So let's assume that, if I miss the GROUP BY clause or miss a field no aggregated from the SELECT clause when I get at least an aggregate function on a field with at least a no aggregated field in the SELECT clause, the database should check the GROUP BY clause at compile time and add mandate missed the fields in the GROUP BY clause.

    Example,

    SQL1:_
    SELECT dept_no, Salary
    The EMPLOYEE
    GROUP BY dept_no;

    SQL2:_
    SELECT dept_no, Salary
    The EMPLOYEE;

    Here, the SQL1 and SQL2, both should give me same output without error.

    I can't understand why this is handled?

    Hello

    998478 wrote:
    ... If we mix the aggregated and non-aggregated values, then there must be a GROUP BY clause that contains all non-aggregated values. Why this is handled by the database/compiler itself?

    It IS managed by the compiler itself. The compiler manages to trigger an error. The compiler has no way of knowing if you want to remove something from the SELECT clause, or add something to the GROUP BY clause, or not to use the aggregate functions or use several aggregate functions, or a combination of the above. If the compiler re-writes your code and none of these things done automatically, it would be wrong more often that he was right, and you would (rightly) complain about his behavior.

    For example, it is clearly wrong:

    SELECT    deptno
,       job
,       SUM (sal)
FROM       scott.emp
GROUP BY  deptno
;

    What is the right way to fix it?

    1. remove something from the SELECT clause

    SELECT    deptno
,       SUM (sal)
FROM       scott.emp
GROUP BY  deptno
;

    2. add something to the GROUP BY clause

    SELECT    deptno
,       job
,       SUM (sal)
FROM       scott.emp
GROUP BY  deptno
,         job
;

    3. do not use aggregate functions

    SELECT    deptno
,       job
,       sal
FROM       scott.emp
;

    4. use several aggregate functions

    SELECT    deptno
,       MIN (job)
,       SUM (sal)
FROM       scott.emp
GROUP BY  deptno
;

    What are all the options, either. For example, the correct solution would be to use analytical functions instead of aggregate functions.
    How can anyone tell which of them is right? They all have the right answer for some problem.

    Moreover, by saying that everying in the SELECT clause must be an aggregate or in the GROUP BY clause is a bit oversimplified.
    Fuller, here's the ABC of GROUP BY:
    When you use a GROUP BY clause or in an aggregate function, then all in the SELECT clause must be:
    (A) a ggregate function,
    (B) one of the expressions "group By."
    (C) adding to C, or
    (D) something that Depends on the foregoing. (For example, if you "GROUP BY TRUNC (dt)", you can SELECT "TO_CHAR (TRUNC (dt), 'Mon - DD')").

    Published by: Frank Kulash on April 13, 2013 13:44
    Additional code examples.

  • Control the Append KM, Group by clause

    Hi all

    I am using the max function in interface (KM: control IKM append), in the map apart from the source columns in the data store that I use few variables ODI (say LD_ID = 200). Sort of variable LD_ID is being picked up by the KM in the group clause, why Labour fails with the error
    GROUP BY position 200 isn't in the target list. I understand the error but do not know why this variable in the grop is recovered by the clause. The substituition method that I see in the KM is odiRef.getGrpBy)

    Can someone help me with this please?

    Thank you
    Ashok

    Hey Ashok,

    When using (a) or several global functions, like SUM, ODI add one GROUP BY clause with all other columns in it.
    You can try to move the mapping of the LD_ID on the target and see if it works (it depends on the architecture you).

    Kind regards
    JeromeFr

  • Group by Clause displays all values search

    Hello friends

    I have a simple table with columns named Date, reason, product and County and the sample data are shown below.

    ==========================
    Date reason product count
    ==========================
    08/06/2012 raison1 home 1
    08/07/2012 raison2 motor 1
    08/08/2012 raison1 home 1
    08/09/2012 Reason3 Home 2
    08/10/2012 raison1 home 1
    08/06/2012 Reason5 home 1
    ===========================

    Altogether, I have 5 values of research through Reason5 raison1 reason, but few of them understand the table above.
    I would like to diplay result per day and I will quote an example of August 6, I want to display the result below, i.e. show all reason 5 search and assign zero count if there are no records for this day there.

    =====================================
    DATE REASON HOME_COUNT MOTOR_COUNT
    =====================================
    08/06/2012 raison1 1-0
    08/06/2012 0 1 raison2
    08/06/2012 Reason3 0 0
    08/06/2012 Reason4 0 0
    08/06/2012 Reason5 1 0
    =====================================


    If we write group by clause, missing for reasons such as Reason3 Reason4 will not appear in the result set.
    And I tried to write several UNION ALL queries to get the above result that works very well, but if it 100 search values, I don't want to write 100 Union queries.
    Please let me know if you have analytical functions to display the results of the end?

    Thank you
    Murali.

    Published by: Nathalie b on August 19, 2012 20:17

    If you followed relational design, you should lookup table. If you do not, you need to create a. In addition, date is reserved word, and the County is a key word, to not use as column names. Then, use the outer join:

    SQL> create table tbl as
  2  select to_date('06/08/2012','dd/mm/yyyy') dt,'Reason1' reason,'Home' product,1 qty from dual union all
  3  select to_date('07/08/2012','dd/mm/yyyy'),'Reason2','Motor',1 from dual union all
  4  select to_date('08/08/2012','dd/mm/yyyy'),'Reason1','Home',1 from dual union all
  5  select to_date('09/08/2012','dd/mm/yyyy'),'Reason3','Home',2 from dual union all
  6  select to_date('10/08/2012','dd/mm/yyyy'),'Reason1','Home',1 from dual union all
  7  select to_date('06/08/2012','dd/mm/yyyy'),'Reason5','Home',1 from dual
  8  /

Table created.

SQL> create table reason_list as
  2  select  'Reason' || level reason from dual connect by level <= 5
  3  /

Table created.

SQL> select  d.dt,
  2          r.reason,
  3          nvl(
  4              sum(
  5                  case product
  6                    when 'Home' then qty
  7                  end
  8                 ),
  9              0
 10             ) home_qty,
 11          nvl(
 12              sum(
 13                  case product
 14                    when 'Motor' then qty
 15                  end
 16                 ),
 17              0
 18             ) motor_qty
 19    from      (
 20               select  min_dt + level - 1 dt
 21                 from  (
 22                        select  min(dt) min_dt,
 23                                max(dt) max_dt
 24                          from  tbl
 25                       )
 26                 connect by level <= max_dt - min_dt + 1
 27              ) d
 28          cross join
 29              reason_list r
 30          left join
 31              tbl t
 32            on (
 33                    t.dt = d.dt
 34                and
 35                    t.reason = r.reason
 36               )
 37    group by d.dt,
 38             r.reason
 39    order by d.dt,
 40             r.reason
 41  /

DT        REASON                                           HOME_QTY  MOTOR_QTY
--------- ---------------------------------------------- ---------- ----------
06-AUG-12 Reason1                                                 1          0
06-AUG-12 Reason2                                                 0          0
06-AUG-12 Reason3                                                 0          0
06-AUG-12 Reason4                                                 0          0
06-AUG-12 Reason5                                                 1          0
07-AUG-12 Reason1                                                 0          0
07-AUG-12 Reason2                                                 0          1
07-AUG-12 Reason3                                                 0          0
07-AUG-12 Reason4                                                 0          0
07-AUG-12 Reason5                                                 0          0
08-AUG-12 Reason1                                                 1          0

DT        REASON                                           HOME_QTY  MOTOR_QTY
--------- ---------------------------------------------- ---------- ----------
08-AUG-12 Reason2                                                 0          0
08-AUG-12 Reason3                                                 0          0
08-AUG-12 Reason4                                                 0          0
08-AUG-12 Reason5                                                 0          0
09-AUG-12 Reason1                                                 0          0
09-AUG-12 Reason2                                                 0          0
09-AUG-12 Reason3                                                 2          0
09-AUG-12 Reason4                                                 0          0
09-AUG-12 Reason5                                                 0          0
10-AUG-12 Reason1                                                 1          0
10-AUG-12 Reason2                                                 0          0

DT        REASON                                           HOME_QTY  MOTOR_QTY
--------- ---------------------------------------------- ---------- ----------
10-AUG-12 Reason3                                                 0          0
10-AUG-12 Reason4                                                 0          0
10-AUG-12 Reason5                                                 0          0

25 rows selected.

SQL>

    SY.

  • Reg - search form for a VO in group by clause

    Hello
    I have a bar chart that displays data based on the query below.

    SELECT THE STATE. BATCH AS STATUSID, STATUS. STATUS, COUNTY (SR. SERVICEREQUEST_ID) AS SRCOUNT
    OF SR, SERVICEREQUESTSTATUS STATE SERVICE_REQUEST
    WHERE SR. BATCH = STATUS. BATCH
    GROUP STATUS. BATCH, STATUS. STATUS, SR. BATCH

    It displays the number of SRs against a particular status.
    Now, I need to add a search form to this graph with the customer and the date range.
    So you need to add the following line to the place where clause.
    SR. "CUSTOMER_ID =: customerId AND SR. "BETWEEN REQUESTED_ON: fromDate and: to this day.
    But the SR columns. CUSTOMER_ID, SR. REQUESTED_ON also needs to be added to the select clause to create criteria for the search panel view.
    The two columns should also be added to the group by clause if you want to add in the select clause.
    This would not produce the expected results.
    How to create a search with the criteria only form in the where clause. Help, please.


    With respect,
    Guna

    [Url http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E16162_01/apirefs.1112/e17483/oracle/jbo/server/ViewObjectImpl.html] ViewObjectImpl has methods to do this programmatically (setQuery, defineNamedWhereClauseParam, setNamedWhereClauseParam) that you can use to manipulate the query variables bind expected and the values of the lie.

    John

  • ORA-00907: lack the right parenthesis when using Group by clause with xmlagg

    I have the following query and I am getting ORA-00907 error when I use the clause with the xmlagg function group.
    select xmlelement("Mitigation",
                xmlelement("m_szMethodName",tm.DisplayName),
                xmlelement("SubstanceInterferenceProtocolList",
                            (select xmlagg(xmlelement("MitigationProtocol",
                                    xmlelement("m_szMethodName",tm.DisplayName),
                                    xmlelement("m_szInterferenceProtocolName",tmp.protocol_name),
                                    xmlelement("m_szInterferenceSubstance",tmp.intf_mtrl_prod_code),
                                    xmlelement("m_ProtocolParameters",
                                        xmlelement("m_szProtocolName",tmp.protocol_name),
                                            xmlelement("m_Consumables",
                                                xmlelement("Consumable",
                                                    xmlelement("m_szConsumId", xrl.rgnt_pack_name),
                                                    xmlelement("m_szProductCode",xrl.pack_prod_code),
                                                    xmlelement("m_nVolume",tmp.fluid_vol),
                                                    xmlelement("m_szProtocolStep",xps.protocol_step_name))),
                                                xmlelement("m_ProtParamList",
                                                    xmlagg(
                                                    xmlelement("ParameterValues",
                                                        xmlelement("m_szProtocolName",tmp.protocol_name),
                                                        xmlelement("m_Time",xpsd.parameter_ntime_value))
                                                    group by tmp.ccd_test_id,tmp.intf_mtrl_prod_code)
                )))
                order by tmp.ccd_test_id, tmp.intf_mtrl_prod_code, xps.protocol_step_intprotocolstep )
                from XPR_tdef_mitigation_protocol tmp, xp_reagentlist xrl,
                xpr_protocol_settings xps, xpr_protocol_settings_default xpsd
                where tmp.ccd_test_id = tm.ccd_test_id
                and tmp.ccd_test_id = xrl.ccd_test_id
                and tmp.pack_prod_code = xrl.pack_prod_code
                and tmp.intf_type = 1
                and xps.protocol_name = xpsd.protocol_name
                and xps.protocol_step_name = xpsd.protocol_step_name
                and xps.ps_action_parameterlist = xpsd.ps_action_parameterlist
                and xps.protocol_name =  tmp.PROTOCOL_NAME
                )))
from XPtoXPRTdef_defn_mapping tm
where tm.DisplayName = 'SYPH'
    If I remove the clause xmlagg and the group by clause, the query works well and not give me the result.
    But in this code XML, the output format is incorrect for my application.

    Could someone help out here?

    Now my problem is that this unique coating is more than 32767 characters and utl_file can write 32767 bytes per line.
    Someone deal with this?

    Serialize the output as CLOB and DBMS_XSLPROCESSOR.clob2file procedure used to write to a file:

    DECLARE
  xml_output CLOB;
BEGIN
  SELECT XMLElement("Department",
           XMLAgg(
             XMLElement("Employee",e.job_id||' '||e.last_name)
             ORDER BY e.last_name
           )
         ).getClobVal() AS "Dept_list"
  INTO xml_output
  FROM hr.employees e
  WHERE e.department_id = 30 OR e.department_id = 40;

  DBMS_XSLPROCESSOR.clob2file(xml_output, 'XML_DIR', 'test.xml');
END;
/

  • can do without group by clause report through parameter

    Hello expert,

    I need to create a report in which the user select a field and adds this field in the group by clause of the sql query.


    I know that the notion of setting lexical but getting only not the idea how the user for the group by clause...
    I tried the following

    Select trunc (m.spc_doc_date),
    -d.spc_item_code,
    Sum (NVL(d.req_qty,0)) x, sum (nvl(d.spc_item_qty,0)) y
    of spc_ppc_daily_m m, spc_ppc_daily_d d
    where m.spc_doc_ # in (select spc_doc_ # from spc_ppc_daily_m where fncl_year = 20112012)
    and m.fncl_year = 20112012
    and d.blce_qty > 0
    and m.spc_locn_code = 400001
    "and m.spc_doc_date between February 1, 2012'-February 29, 2012"
    and m.spc_locn_code = d.spc_locn_code
    and m.fncl_year = d.fncl_year
    and m.spc_doc_ #= d.spc_doc_ #.
    Group by & g_by
    ----------------------------

    g_by is the report parameter

    Thank you
    Yoann

    yash_08031983 wrote:
    Hello Hamid

    But when I compile my sql triggers Error statement due to & g_by or: g_by parameter.

    Hello, yoann

    Most likely, you are getting error ORA-00936 .

    If the error above is true, then you are missing a part in sql.
    First without lexical parameter your query should be ok. Correct your query without lexical parameter, and then add the lexical parameter.
    Try this

    select trunc(m.spc_doc_date),
--d.spc_item_code,
sum(nvl(d.req_qty,0)) x,sum(nvl(d.spc_item_qty,0)) y
from spc_ppc_daily_m m, spc_ppc_daily_d d
where m.spc_doc_# in(select spc_doc_# from spc_ppc_daily_m where fncl_year=20112012)
and m.fncl_year=20112012
and d.blce_qty>0
and m.spc_locn_code=400001
and m.spc_doc_date between '01-feb-2012' and '29-feb-2012'
and m.spc_locn_code=d.spc_locn_code
and m.fncl_year=d.fncl_year
and m.spc_doc_#=d.spc_doc_#
group by trunc(m.spc_doc_date) &g_by

    Hope this helps...

  • Select the columns not in the group by clause

    Hello

    My version of DB is 10.0.2

    I have query, where in I need to select two columns more but that should not be part of the group by Clause.

    Does perform a work around?
    SELECT  F.custnum, 
  V.Import_date,
 -- F.ErledigtMM,F.ErledigtGrundMM, (Columns to be selected additionally)
  nvl(sum(nvl(round(V.VerAuf16/1000,2), 0)  +nvl(round(V.VerAuf17/1000,2), 0)  + nvl(round(V.VerAuf18/1000,2), 0)  + nvl(round(V.VerAuf19/1000,2), 0)  + nvl(round(V.VerAuf20/1000,2), 0)  + nvl(round(V.VerAufKAPUn/1000,2), 0)  + nvl(round(V.VerAufKAPVz/1000,2), 0) ), 0)  Mandantenforderung,
  nvl(sum(nvl(round(V.VerAuf4/1000,2), 0) ), 0) Inkassokosten,
  nvl(sum(nvl(round(V.VerAuf5/1000,2), 0) ), 0) KontoFuehrungsgebuehren,
  nvl(sum(nvl(round(V.VerAuf1/1000,2), 0)  + nvl(round(V.VerAuf2/1000,2), 0) ), 0)  Verwertungskosten,
  nvl(sum(nvl(round(V.VerAuf10/1000,2), 0)  + nvl(round(V.VerAuf8/1000,2), 0) + nvl(round(V.VerAuf9/1000,2), 0) ), 0)  Barauslagen,
  nvl(sum(nvl(round(V.VerAuf13/1000,2), 0)  + nvl(round(V.VerAuf14/1000,2), 0) + nvl(round(V.VerAuf15/1000,2), 0)  + nvl(round(V.VerAuf6/1000,2), 0) ),0)  Gerichtskosten,
  nvl(sum(nvl(round(V.VerAuf11/1000,2), 0)  + nvl(round(V.VerAuf12/1000,2), 0)  + nvl(round(V.VerAuf7/1000,2), 0) ), 0) RAKosten,
  TO_CHAR(F.Created_Date,'MM.YYYY') Created_Date_MM ,
  TO_CHAR(F.Created_Date,'YYYY') Created_Date_MMRRRR
FROM FACM F, VA V 
   WHERE  F.custnum =  DECODE(0,0,F.custnum,0) AND
  F.accnum = V.accnum 
  GROUP BY F.custnum, V.Import_date,TO_CHAR(F.Created_Date,'MM.YYYY') ,TO_CHAR(F.Created_Date,'YYYY'))

    Hello

    Here's what I suggest:

    select
a.custnum,
a.import_date,
b.ErledigtMM,
b.ErledigtGrundMM,
a.Mandantenforderung,
a.Inkassokosten,
a.KontoFuehrungsgebuehren,
a.Verwertungskosten,
a.Barauslagen,
a.Gerichtskosten,
a.RAKosten,
a.Created_Date_MM ,
a.Created_Date_MMRRRR
from (
SELECT  F.custnum,
  V.Import_date,
  nvl(sum(nvl(round(V.VerAuf16/1000,2), 0)  +nvl(round(V.VerAuf17/1000,2), 0)  + nvl(round(V.VerAuf18/1000,2), 0)  + nvl(round(V.VerAuf19/1000,2), 0)  + nvl(round(V.VerAuf20/1000,2), 0)  + nvl(round(V.VerAufKAPUn/1000,2), 0)  + nvl(round(V.VerAufKAPVz/1000,2), 0) ), 0)  Mandantenforderung,
  nvl(sum(nvl(round(V.VerAuf4/1000,2), 0) ), 0) Inkassokosten,
  nvl(sum(nvl(round(V.VerAuf5/1000,2), 0) ), 0) KontoFuehrungsgebuehren,
  nvl(sum(nvl(round(V.VerAuf1/1000,2), 0)  + nvl(round(V.VerAuf2/1000,2), 0) ), 0)  Verwertungskosten,
  nvl(sum(nvl(round(V.VerAuf10/1000,2), 0)  + nvl(round(V.VerAuf8/1000,2), 0) + nvl(round(V.VerAuf9/1000,2), 0) ), 0)  Barauslagen,
  nvl(sum(nvl(round(V.VerAuf13/1000,2), 0)  + nvl(round(V.VerAuf14/1000,2), 0) + nvl(round(V.VerAuf15/1000,2), 0)  + nvl(round(V.VerAuf6/1000,2), 0) ),0)  Gerichtskosten,
  nvl(sum(nvl(round(V.VerAuf11/1000,2), 0)  + nvl(round(V.VerAuf12/1000,2), 0)  + nvl(round(V.VerAuf7/1000,2), 0) ), 0) RAKosten,
  TO_CHAR(F.Created_Date,'MM.YYYY') Created_Date_MM ,
  TO_CHAR(F.Created_Date,'YYYY') Created_Date_MMRRRR
FROM FACM F, VA V
   WHERE  F.custnum =  DECODE(0,0,F.custnum,0) AND
  F.accnum = V.accnum
  GROUP BY F.custnum, V.Import_date,TO_CHAR(F.Created_Date,'MM.YYYY') ,TO_CHAR(F.Created_Date,'YYYY'))
) a,
FACM b
where b.custnum = a.custnum

    By the way

    WHERE  F.custnum =  DECODE(0,0,F.custnum,0) AND F.accnum = V.accnum

    can be translated into

    WHERE F.accnum = V.accnum

    because

    F.custnum =  DECODE(0,0,F.custnum,0)

    is always true
    because

    DECODE(0,0,F.custnum,0)

    means

    if 0=0 then F.custnum else 0

  • Not a GROUP BY clause error

    Hi all

    Can someone tell me what is wrong with the query below? I get an exception is NOT a GROUP OF CLAUSE:
    SELECT
        LAST_DAY((xxx.timevalue)) as  SUMMARYDATE
      , xxx.acct AS ACCTNUM
      , xxx.referenceid AS SEARCHTYPE
       , CASE WHEN NVL(xxx.PRIMARYSRCH_IND,'N') = 'Y' THEN COUNT(xxx.searchid) ELSE 0 END  Cnt_PrimarySearches
               , CASE WHEN NVL(xxx.primarysrch_ind,'N') = 'N' THEN COUNT(xxx.Searchid) ELSE 0 END  Cnt_SecondarySearches
     
      FROM XXX_Tablename xxx
      WHERE
       xxx.referenceid NOT IN ('Alert','Search','Collection')
      GROUP BY
  LAST_DAY((xxx.timevalue))  
  , xxx.acctnum
  , xxx.referenceid

    Hello

    Try this

    SELECT
        LAST_DAY((xxx.timevalue)) as  SUMMARYDATE
      , xxx.acct AS ACCTNUM
      , xxx.referenceid AS SEARCHTYPE
       ,COUNT( CASE WHEN NVL(xxx.PRIMARYSRCH_IND,'N') = 'Y' THEN (xxx.searchid) ELSE 0 END  Cnt_PrimarySearches)
               , COUNT(CASE WHEN NVL(xxx.primarysrch_ind,'N') = 'N' THEN (xxx.Searchid) ELSE 0 END) Cnt_SecondarySearches

      FROM XXX_Tablename xxx
      WHERE
       xxx.referenceid NOT IN ('Alert','Search','Collection')
      GROUP BY
  LAST_DAY((xxx.timevalue))
  , xxx.acctnum
  , xxx.referenceid

    Not tested

  • Understanding of the multiple GROUP BY clause column

    Hi all
    Suppose I have the HR schema example, what is the difference between these two codes?
    select department_id, job_id, count(*) from employees GROUP BY department_id, job_id ORDER BY 1,2;
    and
    select department_id, job_id, count(*) from employees GROUP BY job_id,department_id ORDER BY 1,2;
    I do not see the difference when I run these queries.

    Best regards
    Valerie

    Well, semantically there is no difference: the two queries are equivalent, they return the same result as the value of lines.

    The order of columns in a GROUP BY clause is unrelated to the result set of a query. You group by this "group of columns.

    And since you order two games using the exact same ORDER BY clause, the order in which Oracle returns the bag of lines is the same too in your case.

  • Subquery in GROUP BY CLAUSE

    Is it possible to place a subquery in the GROUP BY CLAUSE? If this is the case, can anyone show me an example? Thank you

    Hello

    This is a GROUP BY clause that uses an IN subquery:

    SELECT    COUNT (*)     AS cnt
FROM       scott.emp
GROUP BY  CASE
          WHEN deptno  IN (
                         SELECT     deptno
                         FROM     scott.dept
                         WHERE     loc     = 'NEW YORK'
                    )
          THEN  1
          ELSE  2
       END
;

    I've never seen a need for it (and I was at a state fair, a rodeo and a picnic!)

    Interestingly, if I copy the expression in the GROUP BY clause from the SELECT clause:

    SELECT    COUNT (*)     AS cnt
,       CASE
          WHEN deptno  IN (
                         SELECT     deptno
                         FROM     scott.dept
                         WHERE     loc     = 'NEW YORK'
                    )
          THEN  1
          ELSE  2
       END          AS new_york
FROM       scott.emp
GROUP BY  CASE
          WHEN deptno  IN (
                         SELECT     deptno
                         FROM     scott.dept
                         WHERE     loc     = 'NEW YORK'
                    )
          THEN  1
          ELSE  2
       END
;

    I get this error:

    ...             WHEN deptno  IN (
                     *
ERROR at line 3:
ORA-00979: not a GROUP BY expression

    Despite what this book says you can use a subquery-IN like this in an ORDER BY clause:

    SELECT       deptno
FROM       scott.emp
ORDER BY  CASE
          WHEN deptno  IN (
                         SELECT     deptno
                         FROM     scott.dept
                         WHERE     loc     = 'DALLAS'
                    )
          THEN  1
          ELSE  2
       END
;

    (New York is Department 10, the first anyway, is not as clear to use the same exact example.)

  • CFQUERYPARAM tag does not work in the GROUP BY clause

    I get an error whenever I put a CFQUERYPARAM tag in a GROUP BY clause. I saw on another forum, someone had a similar problem with the ORDER BY clause

    Here's a sample of what might look like my code
    Select x, y, z of ABC
    Group of < cfqueryparam value = 'x' cfsqltype = "cf_sql_float" >

    Here is the error I get.

    Run database query error.
    [Macromedia] [Oracle JDBC Driver] [Oracle] ORA-00979: not a GROUP BY expression

    Any idea?

    Cachedwithin and cachedafter functions store the query results in the RAM of the server. This means that, even if it is cached, when you run it, you get the cached result instead of going to the database to run again. This increases the speed of course, but if the data is changed during the period of cover, you have accuracy problems.

    It creates no memory problems. In the administrator you book a certain amount of memory for the query cache. If you exceed this amount, the last request to shoot the first query on, or something like that.

    In regards to what you're trying to do on the binding of variables to your group by clause, this isn't what cfqueryparam has been designed for. It has been designed to
    where clauses (where it =
    or insert queries (insert in my values in the table (field) ())
    and things like that.

    You try to use it for anything other than what it was designed for, which explains why it does not work for you.

  • Group By clause in oracle 10g need help

    Hello
    We have a requirement that get the AR details of aging at the customer level. I wrote the following query to retrieve the correct rows at the invoice level. But now I need calculate the sum of the amounts and I show you the invoice and customer level. Could you please help me how can I group by the client.

    Here's the query I used

    Select ps.org_id
    sobbed. SET_OF_BOOKS_ID
    sobbed. CHART_OF_ACCOUNTS_ID
    gcc. Company of SEGMENT1
    gcc. SEGMENT2 location
    gcc. Department of SEGMENT3
    gcc. SEGMENT4 account
    gcc. Future_1 SEGMENT5
    gcc. SEGMENT6 Future_2
    gcc. SEGMENT7 Future_3
    gcc. CONCATENATED_SEGMENTS gl_cc_concat_kff
    ps.trx_number
    ps.trx_date
    ps.due_date
    ps.invoice_currency_code
    sob.currency_code SOB_Currency_Code
    ps.class
    ps.amount_due_original
    , ps.amount_due_original * nvl (ps.exchange_rate, 1) acctd_amount_due_original
    ps.amount_due_remaining
    ps.acctd_amount_due_remaining
    ps.status
    ps.cust_trx_type_id
    ps.customer_site_use_id
    ps.customer_trx_id
    ps.cash_receipt_id
    ps.gl_date
    rctlda. CODE_COMBINATION_ID
    ps.customer_id
    nvl (ATCM. ATTRIBUTE5, ps. CUSTOMER_ID) End_Customer_Id
    rc.customer_number
    rc2. CUSTOMER_NUMBER Brand_Cust_no
    , round ((sysdate-ps.due_date))
    of gl_sets_of_books ob
    , hr_operating_units or
    ar_payment_schedules_all ps
    ra_customers rc
    ra_cust_trx_line_gl_dist_all rctlda
    gl_code_combinations_kfv gcc
    ra_customer_trx_all ATCM
    ra_customers rc2
    where sob.set_of_books_id = ou.set_of_books_id
    and ou.organization_id = ps.org_id
    and ps.status = 'OP '.
    and ps.org_id is not null
    and ps. CUSTOMER_ID = rc. CUSTOMER_ID
    and ps. CUSTOMER_TRX_ID = rctlda. CUSTOMER_TRX_ID
    and rctlda. ACCOUNT_CLASS = "REC".
    and rctlda.latest_rec_flag = 'Y '.
    and rctlda. CODE_COMBINATION_ID = gcc. CODE_COMBINATION_ID
    and ps. CUSTOMER_TRX_ID = ATCM. CUSTOMER_TRX_ID
    and gcc. CODE_COMBINATION_ID = 39446
    - and ps.trx_number = 1-15O0A8O'
    - and rc. CUSTOMER_NUMBER = 1-10PA5KX'
    and nvl (ATCM. ATTRIBUTE5, ps. CUSTOMER_ID) = rc2. CUSTOMER_ID

    Could someone help me how to recover the same columns with sum (ps.amount_due_original) for each client. I tried to use the group by clause, but it gives to new level of the invoice.
    But my req's for each customer the amount of the invoice must be added and it should give the total

    Thank you
    THERE

    If you need to have the amount of the invoice for each customer may also need to check the
    CUBE
    http://download.Oracle.com/docs/CD/B28359_01/server.111/b28286/statements_10002.htm#sthref9448
    and example here
    http://download.Oracle.com/docs/CD/B28359_01/server.111/b28286/statements_10002.htm#i2066443

    and ROLLUP
    http://download.Oracle.com/docs/CD/B28359_01/server.111/b28286/statements_10002.htm#sthref9445

    I couldn't keep up with all your SQL statement, or I could rewrite for you once again
    Thank you

    Published by: user9532576 on July 21, 2009 09:24

Maybe you are looking for

  • Win7 drivers for Broadcom BCM943228HMB WLAN 802.11abgn 2 x 2?

    Is there a generic driver or something available for this adapter WiFi/Bluetooth for Windows 7? It is a G1 215 HP. I tried sp61836, then realized it's to win only 8. Also tried some old drivers WiFi Broadcom nothing helps. When I called HP support al

  • How to disable the password on resume session logon screen

    Original title: how to get the previous settings on the monitor where sreen is in the active position and not go to the page asking for the password to open the menu Please help me with this problem; the problem is that every time that I leave and co

  • Microsoft office for windows 7 will not download

    Thus, after Windows 10 has been downloaded without authorization on our laptop ASUS and nearly a week of the struggle of the community looking for a solution, that I got ASUS was the F9 recovery.  Of course the Office package that we bought to be rei

  • BlackBerry Smartphones a bad thing?

    Well, so it is said in the corner of my 9300 curve 3g, instead of the usual 3 G. He won't let me check the new facebook updates, or get text messages or anything like that. I tried to restart the system and nothing. It's annoying because he has done

  • Sound/audio does not work after automatic update of Windows 8 for the July 12, 2014

    Solving audio problems do not detect a problem. When I go to the control panel > hardware & sound > playback, right-click on the device, I get this message: "This device is used by another application. Please close all devices... " However, I restart