Hi8 thru cam HDV into FCP 7: waiting for timecode

Similar Questions

• While you wait for spare camera for 40 days. My k910 has speaker failure. : ()

  What a piece of crap... My k910 start failure involved while I'm waiting for spare camera... Call speaker is ok, but the media here totally dead speaker... It's my problemfull phone I've ever had... My past a706 and my wife s920 are problemless...

  Fortunately after a tried to push both the up and down button of the active again speaker volume...

• So... how long must we wait for a RAW update for the camera Nikon D600?

  So... how long must we wait for a RAW update for the camera Nikon D600?

  Hello!  Good news for you: your wait is over: the Nikon D600 received preliminary support (this means that the rendering of colors may slightly change in future versions, when it will be officially supported) from today: http://blogs.adobe.com/lightroomjournal/2012/10/camera-raw-7-2now-available.html

• still waiting for out of warranty repair to fix my pc.

  Hello I have an alien ware m18x and spent a lot of money on this laptop. I liked from the start, but not even a year after the motherboard came out no problem my warranty covered. Welcome to 5-6 months later my warranty has expired and bam the motherboard went out to new same problem than before. It happened in mid-term for the College so I called the guy and a week later was able to pay and send my laptop.

  now, this is where I am getting very angry with dell. When I sent that far they told me 7-10 working days although we are on day 20 now and nothing has been done with this laptop. Let's start in the order of all the stuff that has happened since you guys my laptop.

  1. I sent the laptop to you guys, but it took 2 days for the depo to sign for it.

  2. the depo began working on it and then 5 seconds later put a shim of payment by saying that I did not pay $430. It took about 3-4 days of calling me support and begging them to tell the depo I paid and even provide my payment number.

  3. have you called agents support so many times to ask what is the hold up because the depo never updates the link, they sent me in email. officers tell me to wait and just check the link.

  4 depo puts a wedge of parts which took more than 2 weeks to find just that part. I'm always told that they do not always have a part.  Nobody sews really to find out what is happening right now.

  honestly, I regret spending crazy amount of money I did on this mobile no only I'm still waiting for some news as to when its going to be fixed, but this delay destroyed my college this semester. I have finals in 2 weeks, I also have my review of certification compIT in 3 weeks all the stuff that I need are in the computer including all my papers. I am begging you guys just get my laptop fixed or ask someone who speaks English actually could you tell me what is happening.

  honestly, I want to start looking for a monetary value for the amount of hassle, than what has been. «There was a lot more, but as I am not the kind of person that insults people I haven't posted it.» but lets just say that some calls where not very beautiful side valleys.

  Hello Travis,

  First of all, I would like to apologize for any discomfort your siding with your system and the time it has taken to repair the unit.

  From time to time, Dell may run into questions parties may run out of stock and there is not a viable substitute available role. That puts us in a position of having to order the parts from our suppliers and await his arrival. Without knowing the details of your case is probably that your run in. You won't see any changes on the filing status tool until the device is taken out of the hold of the party or other actions take place.

  I am working actually came out of the repair center, and I can check some internal tools to see if I might be able to get a better eta on when the requested party should. If you want to consult me send me a request for direct message with the Service Tag, shipment number and the name of the system is saved. Don't post personal information on the public domain.

  It is recommended, especially when you could be without your systems for a few days, it is best to have a backup of your data separate from your system.

  Kind regards

• iPad 4 blocked mode recovery, itunes waiting for ipad

  I've had my IPad for over two years now and it worked great. But yesterday it just no longer lights. I don't know weather it auto-updated or not, but it became all black. I tried to reload, but the screen remains black after hours of load. The combo of home button and lock 10 seconds also does nothing. I plugged into my Macbook so and tried Itunes. ITunes says "ITunes has detected an iPad in recovery mode. You must restore this iPad before it can be used with iTunes. «So I press ok and restore the iPad, software is extracted and it said "Waiting for iPad...» "for a minute. The next thing is the error message ' the iPad could not be restored. An unknown error occurred (4005). "I tried several times with different cables and USB ports... I don't know what to do anymore.

  I'd be happy for something useful!

  You can try the DFU mode

  If you are unable to update or restore your iPhone, iPad or iPod touch - Apple supports

  If this does not help

  An appointment of 'Genius' to an Apple Store, or select another authorized service provider.

• "Waiting for in time (RT PXI target) real answer" error when the program is waiting interruptions

  Hello

  I developed an application to detect interruptions generated by an electronic card and act accordingly. The program was developed in labview, but she calls a dll; created with labwindows. The dll is scheduled to open the visa communication, select the events and install the interrupt handler and when an interruption is detected, it reads the value of the different registers of the map and returns to labview to view.

  The problem is that when the program expects an interruption, a prompt appears with the message "Waiting for real-time (RT PXI target) real answer" and the only option I have is to click on the button to disconnect the pxi or just wait. If I wait and I generate an interrupt, the prompt disappears and the application view data as it was planned.

  To wait for the following code the interruption has been programmed into the function:

  While (flag == 0)

  {

  Sleep (1000);

  }

  When an interruption occurs, the value of flag set to 1 and function continues without any problem. I am not really sure, but here is probably the problem and it probably isn't the best way to wait for a break because the sleep function suspends the thread to the configured time, but at least the load calculation in the PXI is between 0 and 1%. I was wondering if anyone knows how to wait for a break without 'lost' communication with PXI and if there is a better way to do it.

  Any response will be welcome and thank you for them,

  Jaime

  Hey there.

  You see problems with connectivity it's because the thread by DEFAULT CallLibrary nodes running in is the UI (UI) thread - UI thread manages also the important things like, say, communications (especially all the connections for the VI server) and other things that you could run all the time.  A CallLibraryNode is not, by default, intended to be used to execute code that runs for a long period of time.  If you want to do this, you assign the execution of the CallLibrary node to run in the context of a LabVIEW run-time engine thread (by selecting to make it work "in any thread") and not the UI thread.  This can be done through the properties of the CallLibraryNode.  By selecting "run in any thread" the call DLL will be generally in the context of the thread running in the run LabVIEW, which is usually what is meant when even.  The VI CallLibraryNode color change of Orange (UI) to blue (LabVIEW thread) so that you can quickly tell what context the appeal will be in.

  The reason the interface thread user is the default thread is because most often DLLS calls need to be serialized (because of functions is not not thread-safe) and so it serves to protect the integrity of the system.  However, if you know your threads are thread-safe, or you will use these threads for a while, it is best to program the CallLibraryNode to use a Thread of LabVIEW execution rather than the UI thread.

  For more information on this review on these pages:

  https://decibel.NI.com/content/docs/doc-9069

  http://zone.NI.com/reference/en-XX/help/371361J-01/lvexcodeconcepts/configuring_the_clf_node/

  DLL' happy ing.

  -Danny

• Waiting for timeouts in parallel for loop

  Hello

  I am currently working on a project where I communicate with a number of devices over TCP. This happens at the same time, which is not a problem as long as does not change the number of devices. Now, I want to open my project to support the case with different numbers of hardware devices, which I want to make a loop (read the device of DB information in an array and iterate over all items).

  I read on a single loop parallel execution for, but it seems that the logical cores is a limiting factor for the number of alternative treatments. Unfortunately, I must also take into account delays in communication which translates as the waiting time for each iteration of the loop.

  As you can see I have this creates a lot of idle time that adds up quickly (running with 10 carrots 4 logic devices takes three times the delay to finish without the loop it would not delay time as all connections are pending at the same time.

  I hope someone can direct me to a solution.

  Thank you

  Move the reference VI opened in the first LOOP.

  You use the same reference for all instances.  So wait for asynchronous call will just see one of them finished and the results.  By placing the reference VI open inside your loop, you will have a different reference for each call of your VI.

• Error: "Waiting for programs fill" while trying to add or remove programs

  Original title: cannot complete programs

  When I open Add / Remove programs in the Control Panel, the statement "waiting for programs fill" came and I waited and waited, nothing else has happened then - this hanging window. I tried the DIFFICULTY inside of MS DIFFICULTY, it did not help. Help, please.

  Hi magjoseki,
   
  Follow the steps in the section "Let fix me it myself" article and check if it helps.
  Incorrectly, Add/Remove Programs tool displays installed programs 

   

  Important: This section, method, or task contains steps that tell you how to modify the registry. However, serious problems can occur if you modify the registry incorrectly. Therefore, make sure that you proceed with caution. For added protection, back up the registry before you edit it. Then you can restore the registry if a problem occurs. For more information about how to back up and restore the registry, click on the number below to view the article in the Microsoft Knowledge Base: 

  How to back up and restore the registry in Windows

• Start stuck on "Please wait for the Local Session Manager."

  I would say that this problem started a couple of days. Went to start my laptop (Toshiba) and he sat on the "Please wait" message forever.

  Had no problems to start in safe mode. Looked up various ways of addressing the problem.

  Was able to change the resume date and back a few weeks ago. Still no luck. Happened to read something on a printer Epson being perhaps the problem driver (it was installed a day before the date of restoration chosen). Uninstalled the drivers, computer still does not start.

  Tried restarting running. I do not have the CD it came with Vista, but it was an option when you hold F8 during startup (I think?) Couldn't find any problems.

  Ran check on memory. No problem either.

  Changed settings for a verbose startup and ran a Diagnostic startup - all good for this. Then tried selective startup load system services... This is when the error occurs. When starting, it hangs on "Please wait for the Local Session Manager" and does nothing more.

  I looked in the event viewer to see what came that time and a couple mistakes were:

  Event ID 6000: winlogon notification subscriber was unavailable to handle a notification event.

  Event ID 7026: the next (s) start or start failed to load system
  spldr
  Wanarpv6

  It would be very useful for me not having to run my computer in safe mode automatically all the time, although it is useful that I at least have that option. Any help is greatly appreciated.

  Hello

  1. by chance your computer is connected to a domain environment?

  2. as you mentioned in your article that you tried the selective startup, I want to confirm if you have disabled the services left 3rd after hide Microsoft services?

  If you did not disable these services make sure you disable and then check if it works.
  See the article below for more information.
  How to troubleshoot a problem by performing a clean boot in Windows Vista or in Windows 7
  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/929135
  Note: When the diagnosis is complete, don't forget to reset your computer to normal startup. Follow step 7 in the above article.

  I hope this helps.

  Thank you, and in what concerns:
  Shekhar S - Microsoft technical support.

  Visit our Microsoft answers feedback Forum and let us know what you think.
  If this post can help solve your problem, please click the 'Mark as answer' or 'Useful' at the top of this message. Marking a post as answer, or relatively useful, you help others find the answer more quickly.

• Browser 'waiting for reply' internet USELESS in Win 7 64 bit

  IE 8 and 9 and Firefox all useless to surf the net.  Pages take forever to load or time-out waiting for answer of 'X' message.  20 MB connection is fine (cannot play games thru customer Steam, no problem and e-mail downloads without problem).  Have all the updates, only not running of the addons.  Client Security is MS security essentials, which does not seem to have a problem.

  Do not use is not a proxy.

  Have searched the net and see people with the same or similar problem and all tips are less useless.  Seems to be a problem with maybe windows and not the particular browser, as happens with several browsers.

  At this point, I'm ready to trash the entire system and go back to Win XP.

  SOMEONE PLEASE UNDERSTAND WTF IS WRONG!

  It was a bad router that had only problems with info coming through port 80

  also consult hardware compatibility page

• GSS stuck "waiting for configuration data.

  One of my clients have 2 GSS 4900 running ver 4.1 (1)

  I can't get the ESG service works properly in a secondary gssm running. Gssm service looks like it starts but if I check "gss status" och "Show System State" that it is awaiting configuration data

  MNT - GSS - 002.nt.se #show - system status

  Standby GSS - 4.1 (1) GSSM - Cisco [Mar 12 Nov 16:10:21 UTC 2013]

  Recorded in primary GSSM: 10.16.0.15

  Component waiting for data routing configuration (wait a minute). [runmode = 3]

  START THE SERVER

  16:01 Config agent (crdirector)

  16:01 Config Server (crm)

  16:01 Database

  16:01 GUI Server (tomcat)

  16:01, Node Manager

  16:01 webserver (apache)

  Ping works fine between the GSS: are and there is no firewall involved (both are located on the same ip subnet).

  I did stop gss and then start gss. Waited for 24 hours, but the situation is the same.

  If I'm running tcpdump on the secondary, I see TCP traffic and UDP between the primary and the secondary, although all UDP packets have a warning of incorrect checksum.

  I have no idea on how to t-shoot, that. Should I do gss disable, remove this gss of the primary gssm and enable gss again in the secondary?

  Notice to lovers?

  Hello

  There seems to be a communication problem. You can do the following and see if the GSS is going to runmode = 5.

  On the standby: gss stop gss disable Then, go into the GUI of the GSSM and delete the standby GSS from the resources tab Then go to standby: gss enable gssm-standby x.x.x.x (IP of primary )
  
  Then in the GUI of primary GSSM, you will again see the standby in the resources tab. Click on it, and check on the activate button, then hit submit. Make sure the standby goes to runmode 5 under "gss status" output.
  If this doesn't work then you can try the below:
  Go to the GUI of the GSSM and delete the standby GSS from the resources tab. On the standby: gss stop restore-factory-defaults Make sure you have a console connection so you can do the initial config on the Standby GSS (add IP, etc). Once done, enter standby:
  
  gss enable gssm-standby x.x.x.x Then in the GUI of primary GSSM, you will again see the standby in the  resources tab.
  Click on it, and check on the activate button, then hit submit. Make sure the standby goes to runmode 5.
  
  Kind regards
  Kanwal
  		   

• Waiting for a transition to be completed?

  I use Tweener.AddTween () to apply some transitions to my sprites who say quarter of a second. Once the transition is complete, I need to do something else. The problem is the line immediately after the transition is executed immediately (it does not wait for the transition to complete) and all that mess up. Is it possible in a synchronous way expect the transition ends without taking CPU in a loop, etc.?

  Hey p3pp3r,

  There is a setting for the tweener Oregon 'onComplete' call that performs a function is completed. It goes right into the addTween method.

  Here are more details on the onComplete parameter (along with several other more useful):

  http://hosted.Zeh.com.br/Tweener/docs/en-us/parameters/index.html

  example:

  Tweener.addTween(myobj, {x: 45, onComplete: myFunction});
  

  hope that helps. Good luck!

• Bluetooth: Application does not wait for investigation

  Good afternoon

  For almost a week already had a problem, which already has a load of messages on the forum, after research and do the trial & error for three days, I hope someone can relate to no doubt tiny stupid error I have and I just can't.

  The goal is simple: Once loaded, begins to discover Bluetooth lights nearby.

  Problem: The tags are located and what is work decently, but he does not obey the synchronization (wait/notify).

  I tried several things, but I keep hitting the same problem. It does not take into account my lock and did the survey on the bottom, and only after main thread finished drawing.

  To facilitate the access to tests, I've isolated the problem section.

  // Does Not wait for Inquiry to end!
  

  The solutions tried so far:

  -Temporary "fix" sleep vs sync

  S ' object in static final or none and that any combination of the three options.

  -Develop a 9700 OS 6 SDK: 6.0.0.30 Plugin Java: 1.3.0

  import java.util.Vector;
  
  import javax.bluetooth.BluetoothStateException;
  import javax.bluetooth.DiscoveryAgent;
  import javax.bluetooth.LocalDevice;
  
  import net.rim.device.api.ui.component.AutoTextEditField;
  import net.rim.device.api.ui.component.Dialog;
  import net.rim.device.api.ui.container.MainScreen;
  
  public class MyScreen extends MainScreen
  {
      Vector tags = new Vector();
      private Object lock=new Object();
  
      public MyScreen() throws BluetoothStateException
      {
          super();
          setTitle("Bluetooth Discover");
          Listener myDiscoveryListener = new Listener();
          try
          {
             LocalDevice localDevice = LocalDevice.getLocalDevice();
  
             DiscoveryAgent discoveryAgent = localDevice.getDiscoveryAgent();
  
             discoveryAgent.startInquiry(DiscoveryAgent.GIAC, myDiscoveryListener);
          }
          catch(BluetoothStateException bse)
          {
              Dialog.alert("BluetoothStateException exception: "+bse.toString());
          }
          // Does Not wait for Inquiry to end!
          try
          {
              synchronized(lock)
              {
                  lock.wait();
              }
          } catch (Exception e) {}
          Vector tags = myDiscoveryListener.mac;
          String text="";
          for (int i=0; i
  
  import java.util.Vector;
  
  import javax.bluetooth.DeviceClass;
  import javax.bluetooth.DiscoveryListener;
  import javax.bluetooth.RemoteDevice;
  import javax.bluetooth.ServiceRecord;
  
  public class Listener extends Thread implements DiscoveryListener
  {
      Vector mac = new Vector();
      private Object lock=new Object();
  
      public Listener()
      {
      }
  
      public void deviceDiscovered(RemoteDevice remoteDevice, DeviceClass cod)
      {
          try
          {
              System.out.println("Device: " + remoteDevice.getBluetoothAddress());
          } catch(Exception e){ } finally{ mac.addElement(remoteDevice.getBluetoothAddress().toString()); }
      }
  
      public void inquiryCompleted(int discType)
      {
          if (mac.size() > 0)
          {
              try
              {
                  lock.notifyAll();
              } catch (Exception e){}
          }
      }
  
      public void servicesDiscovered(int transID, ServiceRecord[] servRecord)
      {
      }
  
      public void serviceSearchCompleted(int transID, int respCode)
      {
      }
  }
  
  Thanks in advance for all the help possible and yes I am services that support are not being implemented are not necessary for the current problem that prevents me to further develop my application.
  PF
  			 
  I have the same problem before and still can't fix. I don't know, but it seems that there is a problem in the 9700 OS.
  http://supportforums.BlackBerry.com/T5/Java-development/BB-Bluetooth-connection-cannot-act-as-client...
  In any case please inform me if there is good new ants on this issue.
  Thanks in advance.
  Best regards
  Albert Siu
  		   

• A timeout occurred while waiting for the host controller EHCI interrupt on answer Async ahead Bell.

  Whenever I put my adapter wireless netgear n150 under heavy load (download of World of Warcraft for example), it will go down to connection and until I restart the computer the adapter usb port is useless.  I dug into the event viewer and found that a timeout occurred while waiting for the EHCI host controller interrupt on the asynchronous response advance doorbell, source usbehci.  This seems to have been a problem with windows 8 I found other threads referencing but I can say that they are pre-release and some actually work solutions have been validated.  I already assured that all drivers, firmware and chipsets are up-to-date and compatible.  ANYONE please help?

  Quick fix I found:

  -try falling back to WiFi G rather than use N
  In my case, it works... is no longer a fall. But not the same bandwidth...

• CREATE INDEXES online is waiting for the TX = 4 mode

  Hello

  I have a strange blocking problem where an INDEX CREATE LINE is waiting for a transaction that did only inserted a line in the parent table.

  Wait is mode TX = 4 (not TM locks) and I currently have it reproduced only on 11.2.0.3 and 11.2.0.4

  Easy to replicate the schema SCOTT:

  Session 1:

  SQL > set time on

  14:54:58 SQL > insert into SCOTT. Dept (DEPTNO, dname) values (50, 'test');

  1 line of creation.

  Session 2;

  14:55:24 SQL > create index test on SCOTT. EMP (ename) online;

  It's waiting ' enq: TX - line lock conflict ":"

  SQL > select sid, chain_signature from v$ wait_chains where blocker_is_valid = 'TRUE '.

  SID CHAIN_SIGNATURE

  ---------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------

  603 ' SQL * Net client message' < ='enq: TX - line lock conflict '

  While waiting to acquire the lock of transaction in mode 4:

  SQL > select * lock gv$ where sid = 603

  INST_ID SELECT ADDR KADDR SID TYPE ID1 ID2 LMODE CTIME BLOCK REQUEST

  ---------- ---------------- ---------------- ---------- ---- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ----------

  1 00000006CDA05EB8 00000006CDA05F10 603 352577 0 4 0 348 2 AE

  1 00000006CDA06078 00000006CDA060D0 603 DL 779505 0 3 0 308 2

  1 00000006CD9FABE0 00000006CD9FAC38 603 DL 779505 0 3 0 308 2

  1 00007F28001F5028 00007F28001F5088 603 779505 0 2 0 308 2 TM

  1 00007F28001F5028 00007F28001F5088 603 779510 0 4 0 308 2 TM

  1 00000006CD9FA240 00000006CD9FA298 603 779505 0 4 0 308 2 OD

  1 00000006B4F26790 00000006B4F26808 589847 711499 6 0 308 2 TX 603

  1 00000006CDA0ED68 00000006CDA0EDC0 655377 996169 0 4 308 TX 603 0

  I've traced 10046 and 10704:

  broadcast message = obj 29231196672 #= 779514 tim = 1447251053634045

  ksqgtl * mode TX-000f001e-000ad97c = 4 flags = 0 x 10001 timeout = 21474836 *.

  ksqgtl: xcb = 0x6bb322528, ktcdix = 2147483647, topxcb = 0x6bb322528

  ktcipt (topxcb) = 0 x 0

  ksucti: init logon has of txn DID:

  ksqgtl:

  ksqlkdid: 0001-003F-0000AFC4

  ksudidTrace: ksqgtl

  ktcmydid(): 0001-003F-0000AFC4

  ksusesdi: 0001-003F-0000AFC3

  ksusetxn: 0001-003F-0000AFC4

  ksqcmi: TX, f001e, ad97c mode = 4 timeout = 21474836

  2015-11-11 15:11:36.566

  WAITING #140700792578680: nam ='enq: TX - line lock conflict ' ela 42932082 name = | mode = 1415053316 usn < < 16 | location = sequence 983070 = obj 711036 #= 779514 tim = 1447251096566283

  And there is nothing in V$ SESSION leader/block/line current. class obj # is EMP. current sql_id is the CREATE INDEX.

  If anyone has an idea on:

  -Why creating an index in line must wait for transactions that modified only parent table

  -How to continue the investigation

  -can or cannot reproduce in other versions

  Thanks in advance,

  Franck.

  I guess you have a constraint foreign key between emp and Dept.

  It's expected behaviours: since 11.1 any DML at one end of a referential integrity constraint translates into a mode lock 3 taken at the other end, and your phenomenon resembles a side effect of this.

  When you try to create the index online that your session must assume that the other session (holding mode 3 on the emp and dept) may have changed the emp and dept, so it must wait for the session to the commit or rollback.

  (I guess that in principle, he could walk the cancellation of the transaction see if EMP had in fact been changed - but maybe who was considered too complicated to be worth the risk to implement)

  Concerning

  Jonathan Lewis

  Updated - I just did a quick check to reproduce the effect on 11.1.0.7

  For reference - here are a few notes on modes of locking and how the application has changed over time: https://jonathanlewis.wordpress.com/2010/06/21/locks/