HOW MUCH FASTER?

Similar Questions

• New version of Premiere Pro (CS5.5) - that is how much faster?

  It seems that it is a new version of first Pro CS5.5 now,

  See:

  First Pro CS5.5 is here...

  One who has executed the PPBM5 using the new software, please post any pre/post results of upgrading CS5.5 comparison you might have. Surely I'm not the only one wondering how fast this new version is!

  Thank you

  Jim

  The problem is NOT CS5.5 (although not directly) it's the way we had built PPBM5.  If you take a clip of your choice and encode MPEG2-DVD, you will find that CS5.5 is faster than the CS5, here are a few figures of 3 second 1 minute full AVCHD clip with color correction made four different ways with all the same presets on my fast machine

  Direct Export first 5.0.3 174 seconds

  Through the sequence of import SOUL 5.0.1 142 seconds

  Direct Export first 5.5 seconds 103

  Import sequence through SOUL 5.5 seconds 96

  You see it's 5.5 first which is faster.  We think we know what the problem is with PPBM5 but don't know how to handle it without essentially invalidate all current non - 5.5 partitions (in other words, we will have to have a separate test and results page) whenever a new version of first pulled in the past, we had to make changes and start all over again.

  Post edited by: Bill Gehrke

  Well, you can see that evil and I are not in full sync or maybe there's a possible difference between quad-core (band) and hex-core (Bill) or who knows what?

• How much faster 16 GB 1600 RAM will be more 8 GB 1333?

  I get just in the business of video editing, and I'm still finding my bearings. I just built a computer for use with the first, but I think to upgrade the ram have little more. Currently, I have 8 GB 1333 (4x2Go), and I see this first uses almost all of it. That grows in my video, im worried my ram will become more of a bottleneck. Is it wise for me to update my 16 GB 1600 ram (it should cost me about $125)? im just tired of playing with hardware components at the moment, but if he's going to provide a performance histaria gain I'll do. It's my building right now:

  Core i5 2500

  simple 2 TB drive (please don't kill me, I know im supposed to do an entire raid configuration, I don't have the time to do, ive got a huge delay to come and I don't know the first thing about raid, he prolly do after that)

  Gigabyte gtx 470 overclocked Edition

  OCZ ModXStream Pro 600W

  I will do the entire raid thing at some point (hopefully soon), claim that I have a decent Setup on this front.

  I usually change the raws 1080 p 30 / 60 fps, btw.

  What do you think?

  Your i5 2500 is probably an important bottleneck and very probably more than the 8 GB of RAM.

  Upgraded to an i7 2600 k will give you twice the effective cores (adds hyperthreading "nuclei") for the treatment and accelerate many aspects of CS5 or CS5.5 (assuming that you have one or the other).

  From 8 GB of RAM, 16 GB of RAM might help a little, probably for the most part with coating once a project is completed. This is useful, but I suspect that you are suffering with a normal use of 1080 p on the timeline and timeline with your current configuration.

  You can use the Task Manager to see where your bottlenecks are; If the CPU usage history shows that you use 95 + % of your 4 hearts for those times where you feel it lacks performance, CPU power is probably your most important bottleneck.

  About your big date limit, you can buy additional disks and simply share the load (i.e. projects, cache of media and media cache db on the files on another, scratching still one) for the performance immediately; then, once you have completed your project, you can configure the new drives in RAID 0 and have first rebuild the cache and scratch your files to the new RAID 0 array.

  Jim

• How much memory can I mount in a Tecra M10 - 1CN?

  How much memory can I mount in a Tecra M10 - 1CN and should be in two 200 pin SO DIMM DDR2 PC2-6400 800 MHz modules

  Hello

  Expand the memory depends on the chipset of the motherboard
  The Tecra M10 supports the chipset Mobile Intel GM45 Express and this chipset DDR2 800 MHz RAM 8 GB max

  So first of all, that you can use 2 x 4 GB RAM modules, and on the other hand the speed of memory is limited to 800 MHZ.

  Even if you use faster modules i.e. 1033 Mhz FSB would clock speed to 800 Mhz so it s not worth to use faster than the DDR2 800 Mhz modules

• How much ram can I install?

  How much ram can I install in a Pavilion 500 152ea?

  with the chipset AMD APU A10-6700 (4.3 GHz with Turbo Core, 3.7 GHz, 4 MB cache) card mother AMD A75 FCH.

  Already installed a simple 8 GB of ram

  It is 8GB 16 GB or 32GB? & is it dual channel memory

  operating system is said to be 64-bit has a graphics card separate installed there are 4 dimm slots, I know that is not double

  Thanks for reading & a helping hand

  Tgirl_Alana, welcome to the forum.

  Here is the page of 'product' for the computer.  If you look in the section titled 'Memory upgrade information', it shows the maximum memory as 32 GB with a 64 bit OS.  It is dual channel memory architecture.  Therefore, you should check the memory stick existing brand and match exactly.  Otherwise, dual channel does not work correctly.  Running dual channel memory is faster.  If you does not match the existing memory, it may be better to buy two new sticks as a set.

  Please click on "BRAVO Thumbs Up" if I helped you and click on "Accept as Solution" If your problem is resolved.

• HP Pavilion n012tx: how much RAM can I add to my laptop? If I do it myself, it will go out of warranty?

  I want to increase the RAM of my laptop. It has a 4 GB of ram that is not able to handle some tasks.

  1. I was wondering how much memory can I add to my laptop?

  2. what will be the cost of improvement for a chip of 4 gb of HP service center?

  3. If I do it myself, if my laptop is out of warranty or not?

  Please write a reply only if you are sure.

  Good news for you. The memory is expandable to customer. There is an easy access on the bottom door. See page 47 here.

  Manual

  You can switch to 12 concerts by adding a 8 GB module in the empty slot. Adding a 4 GB module might actually be good too because the memory will run in dual channel, which is a bit faster. Not too many tasks really need more then 8 GB of RAM.

  This is the number of HP part 4 GB module you need:

  Module memory 4 GB (PC3 12800, 1600 MHz) 691740-001, which looks like this:

  

  2 things are important. It is memory (DDR3L 1, 35 volts) low voltage and low density because of the 8 black blocks. Be sure to get the type of memory, so it's guaranteed compatibility.

  This video will help you:

  https://www.YouTube.com/watch?v=L7FvZ-JduRM

  If it's 'the Answer' please click on 'Accept as Solution' to help others find it.

• How much slowdown is caused by policies how? Windows 7

  Hi all

  I use Windows 7 ULT on a machine with dual processor 2 GHZ with only 2 GB of RAM.

  I wonder how much system slowdown is caused by installation of 70 new fonts and more in Windows 7.

  I know that I can use something like a suitcase or another program of fonts, but I want to just hard install these fonts via the "Install" button in each TrueType font.

  I usually install only one, two or three fonts at a time, but I need to install about 55 fonts more after only about 15 new fonts installed, for a total current of about 300 fonts installed.

  My Photoshop has not slowed with the exception of the first time I open once all the new fonts installed, when it is first of all that there's some new fonts to see, but after that first time, it always opens at the same speed, which is fast enough.

  I currently have about 300 fonts installed, but I wonder if install a total of 70 new fonts today will slow this machine significantly its overall performance.

  For example, will be seen 355 fonts considerably slow down the performance of my functions of browser or web system?

  I found information about the fonts and Windows 7, and it seems to indicate that it takes hundreds of newly installed fonts to really slow things down, or the removal of up to 500 fonts to really make a difference to speed up the system.

  I think that having less disk space on one machine, low setting for as little as 6 GB of free hard disk space, can slow down a machine because there is simply not enough HDD to be used as virtual memory space, but I wonder what the additional effect to have 70 new policies could have on this particular machine I happen to be at that time.

  Thanks a lot for any input.

  NuMetro

  "It suggests to hundreds of newly installed fonts to really slow things down.

  That would be fair. I don't know how big stock Photoshop police installation is done, but
  my fonts Windows equal 478 MB (578 files = 578 fonts?).
  You can not exact on how more fonts you can add different fonts using the memory and processor due to the size and complexity.

  Furthermore, it is only those used at some point that will have an impact on the RAM and cpu.
  This applies to your browser or software which is open and using fonts.
  -Most Windows or tabs you have open in your browser or Photoshop as much stress on the system.

  'getting down to as little as 6 GB of hard drive space free'

  Regardless of case, you have enough space for the Page file, once a HARD disk is less than 15%
  free space is no longer, you can defragment the drive, and this will lead to a deterioration
  in the performance.
  -If you use an SSD you will always get degraded performance as while they are not defraged.
  they still need 10% free space to run optimally.

  I wonder - can you install fonts on a USB drive and access it from there, or
  Photoshop only know how to look in one place?

• Should we leave how much free space on the C drive before affecting the performance and speed?

  Hello!

  Hard drive of my new PC (C) is 1 TB (processor Samsung 7i, Windows 8.1). It doesn't have any other disk/partition. How this space is safe to use to store large files (videos, esp., stored in the native video library file) without harming the performance and speed?

  And if I create another partition (D) and just use it for storage, it will make much difference compared to the above?

  Thank you!

  Anna

  Sunday, March 1, 2015 10:59 + 0000, AnaFilipaLopes wrote:

  And if I create another partition (D) and just use it for storage, it will make much difference compared to the above?

  Planning your Partitions

  The Question

  Partitions, how much should I have on my hard drive, what do I use
  each of them for, and what size should each one be?

  It s a common question, but unfortunately this doesn t have a
  only simple, just answer to all the world. A lot of people will respond with
  the way they do, but their response isn't necessarily best for the
  person seeking (in many cases it isn't right even for the person)
  response).

  Terminology

  First, let's rethinking the terminology. Some people ask "should I".
  partition my drive? That s the wrong question, because the
  the terminology is a little strange. Some people think that the word
  "partition" means divide the drive into two or more partitions.
  That s not correct: to partition a drive is to create one or several
  partitions on it. You must have at least one partition to use
  He who think they have an unpartitioned disk actually
  have a player with only one partition on it and it s normally
  Called C:. The choice you have is to have more than one
  partition, not that it's the partition at all.

  A bit of history

  Back before Windows 95 OEM Service Release 2 (also known as Windows
  95 (b) was published in 1996, all MS-DOS and Windows hard drives have been set
  using the file system FAT16 (except for very tiny to aid
  FAT12). That 16-bit only because were used for addressing, FAT16 has a
  maximum 2 GB partition size.

  More than 2 GB of hard disks were rare at the time, but if you had
  one, you must have multiple partitions to use all the available
  space. But even if your drive was not larger than 2GB, FAT16 created
  Another serious problem for many people - the size of the cluster has been
  more great if you had a larger partition. Cluster sizes increased from 512
  bytes for a partition to no greater than32Mb all the way up to 32 KB for a
  partition of 1 GB or more.

  More the cluster size, the space more is wasted on a hard drive.
  That s as space for all the files is allocated in whole clusters
  only. If you have 32 KB clusters, a 1 byte file takes 32 KB, a file, a
  greater than 32 k byte takes 64 k and so on. On average, each file
  about half of his last group waste.

  If large partitions create a lot of waste (called "soft"). With a 2 GB
  FAT16 drive in a single cluster, if you have 10,000 files, each
  lose half a cluster of 32 KB, you lose about 160 MB for relationships. This s
  back in an important part of a player that probably cost more than $400
  1996 - around $ 32.

  So what did the people? They divided their 2 GB drive in two,
  three or more logical drives. Each of these logical drives has been
  smaller the real physical disk, had smaller clusters, and
  so less waste. If, for example, she was able to keep all the partitions
  less than 512 MB, cluster size was only 8 KB, and the loss was reduced to a
  a quarter of what it would be otherwise.

  People partitioned for other reasons also, but back in the days of
  FAT16, it was the main reason to do so.

  The present

  Three things have changed radically since 1996:

  1. the FAT32 and NTFS file systems came along, allowing a larger
  partitions with smaller clusters and so much less waste. In
  with NTFS, cluster sizes are 4 K, regardless of the size of the partition.

  2 hard drives have become much larger, often more than 1 TB (1000 GB) in
  size.

  3 hard drives have become much cheaper. For example, a 500 GB drive
  can be bought today for about $50. That s 250 times the size of this
  Player 2Gb typical 1996, about one-eighth of the price.

  What these things mean together which is the reason to be old to have
  multiple partitions to avoid the considerable wastage of disk space left.
  The amount of waste is much less than it used to be and the cost of
  that waste is much less. For all practical purposes, almost nobody does
  should no longer be concerned about slack, and it should no longer be
  has examined when planning your partition structure.

  What Partitions are used for today

  There are a variety of different ways people put in place several
  scores of these days. Some of these uses are reasonable, some are
  debatable, some are downright bad. I'll discuss a number of Commons
  partition types in the following:

  1. a partition for Windows only

  Most of the people who create such a partition are because they believe
  If they never have to reinstall Windows properly, at least they
  He won t lose their data and he won t have to reinstall their applications.
  because both are safe on other partitions.

  The first of these thoughts is a false comfort and the second
  is downright bad. See the analysis of the types of partition 2 and 4
  below to find out why.

  Also note that over the years, a lot of people who find their windows
  partition that has begun to be the right size proves to be too
  small. For example, if you have such a partition for Windows and later
  upgrade to a newer version of Windows, you may find that your Windows
  partition is too small.

  2. a partition for installed programs

  This normally goes hand in hand with the partition type 1, a partition for
  just Windows. The thought that if you reinstall Windows, your
  installed application programs are safe if they are in another
  partitions is simply not true. That s because all programs installed
  (with the exception of an occasional trivial) have pointers to the inside
  Windows, in the registry and elsewhere, as well as associated files
  buried in the Windows folder. So if Windows, pointers and
  the files go with it. Given that the programs need to be reinstalled if Windows
  the fact, this reasoning to a separate partition for programs not
  work. In fact, there is almost never a good reason to separate
  Windows of the software application into separate partitions.

  3. a partition for the pagefile.

  Some people think mistakenly that the pagefile on another
  score will improve performance. It is also false; It doesn t
  help and often I hurt, performance, because it increases the movement of the head
  to get back to the page to another file frequently used
  data on the disk. For best performance, the paging file should normally
  be on the most widely used score of less used physical player. For
  almost everyone with a single physical disk than the same drive s
  Windows is on C:.

  4. a partition for backup for other partitions.

  Some people make a separate partition to store backups of their other
  or partitions. People who rely on a "backup" are a joke
  themselves. It is only very slightly better than no backup at all.
  because it leaves you likely to be simultaneously the original losses
  and backup for many of the most common dangers: the head crashes and other
  types of drive, serious glitches to power failure, near lightning
  strikes, virus attack, even stolen computer.  In my opinion,.
  secure backup must be on a media removable and not stored in the
  computer.

  5. a partition for data files

  Above, when I discussed separate Windows on a clean partition,
  I pointed out that separate data from Windows is a false comfort if
  He of done with the idea that data will be safe if Windows ever
  must be reinstalled. I call it a false comfort that's because
  I'm afraid many people will rely on this separation, think that their
  data are safe there and so do not take measures to
  Back it up. In truth the data is not safe there. Having to reinstall
  Windows is just one of the dangers to someone a s hard disk and not
  probably even one. This kind of "backup" falls into the same
  category, as a backup to other partitions partition; It lets you
  sensitive to the simultaneous loss of the original and the backup on many of
  the most common dangers that affect the entire physical disk, not
  just the particular partition. Security comes from a solid backup
  diet, not how partition you.

  However, for some people, it may be a good idea to separate Windows and
  programs on the one hand of the data on the other, putting each of the
  two types into separate partitions. I think that most people
  partitioning scheme must be based on their backup system and backup
  plans are generally of two types: whole hard disk imaging
  or data only backup. If you back up data, backup is
  usually facilitated by the presence of a separate with data only partition;
  to save just the score easily, without having to
  collect pieces from here and elsewhere. However, for
  those who backup by creating an image of the entire disk, there is
  usually little, if any, benefit the separation of data in a partition of
  its own.

  Furthermore, in all honesty, I must point out that there are many
  very respected people who recommend a separate partition for Windows,
  Whatever your backup plan.  Their arguments haven t convinced
  me, but there are clearly two views different here.

  6. a partition to image files

  Some people like to deal with the images and videos as something separate
  other data files and create a separate partition for them. To my
  the spirit, an image is simply another type of data and there is no
  the advantage in doing so.

  7. a partition for music files.

  The comments above related to the image files also apply to music
  files. They are just another type of data and must be dealt with the
  just like the other data.

  8. a partition for a second operating system to dual-boot to.

  For those who manage several operating systems (Windows Vista, Windows
  XP, Windows 98, Linux, etc.), a separate partition for each operating
  system is essential. The problems here are beyond the scope of this
  discussion, but simply to note that I have no objection to s
  all these partitions

  Performance

  Some people have several partitions because they believe that it
  somehow improves performance. That s not correct. The effect is
  probably low on modern computers with modern hard disks, but if
  whatever it is, the opposite is true: more music mean poorer
  performance. That's because normally no partition is full and it
  so are gaps between them. It takes time for the drive s
  read/write heads to cross these gaps. Close all files
  are, faster access to them will be.

  Organization

  I think a lot of people overpartition because they use scores as a
  organizational structure. They have a keen sense of order and you want to
  to separate the apples from the oranges on their readers.

  Yes, separating the different types of files on partitions is a
  technical organization, but then is to separate different types of
  files in folders. The difference is that the walls are static and
  fixed in size, while the files are dynamic, changing size automatically
  as needed to meet your changing needs. This usually done records
  a much better way to organize, in my opinion.

  Certainly, partitions can be resized when necessary, but except with the latter
  versions of Windows, which requires a third-party software (the and the
  possibility to do so in Windows is primitive compared to the third-party
  solutions). These third party software normally costs money and not
  any point and how stable it is, affects the entire disk.
  with the risk of losing everything. Plan your partitions in
  first place and repartitioning, none will be necessary.  The need
  to repartition usually occurs as a result of overpartitioning in
  the first place.

  What often happens when people organize with partitions instead
  records are that they make a miscalculation of how much room they need on each
  This partition, and then when they run out of space on the partition
  When a file is logically, while having plenty of space
  on the other hand, they simply saving the file in the score of "poor".
  Paradoxically, therefore, results in this kind of score structure
  less organization rather than more.

  So how should I partition my drive

  If you read what came before, my findings will not come as a
  surprise:

  1. If your backup set is the image of the entire disk, have just one
  single (usually c partition :));

  2. If you backups just data, have two partitions one for Windows and
  application programs installed (usually c :)), the other for data
  (normally D :).)

  With the exception of multiple operating systems, it is rarely
  any advantage to have more than two partitions.

• Tracker camera taped permanently 'camera problems' indicates how much time left

  Tracker camera taped permanently 'camera problems' indicates how much time left

  It is for a 30 second clip shot with a DSLR hand, a little shake and some pan and works

  any ideas?

  Yes, the shots just won't solve. Try to prune the shot is shorter. 30 seconds is an eternity. I just cut a: 30 second TV spot which has 12 changes in action. The average length in a film shots went from 12 seconds in the 1930s to about 3 seconds today. A century of cinema data reveals how movies have changed

  The normal way to work on a camera track turned is to rough, cut to about the finite length of shooting more a few frames as the handles, and then make the camera tracking and insert your effects. If you really must track camera suddenly more than a few seconds, you will need to carefully plan and fire the shot, so the camera can be re-created. More so the more likely is that the software cannot be resolved for the camera. The more things that are moving down the less likely, is that you will get a good solution. For example, if you walk with a camera on a sidewalk in New York spent thirty seconds you probably will be able to solve for the camera, unless hide you all mobile people, then compose the shot until you try to solve it.

  A digital SLR that moves autour a little will also have rolling shutter problems and who gum up the shot. Blur fast movements also clogged the solution. There is no camera Tracker that can solve every time. Tracker of AE camera does a pretty good job with images carefully shot that has a lot of geometry sets in the scene when the lens used has very low distortion of the objective. Without seeing your shot, it's the best I can find. The chance whether the shot instead of a bug is very high.

• How much hard disk space is needed to install all the software cloud? [was: creative cloud memory requirements]

  How much memory is required?

  Hi Welewis123,

  It depends on what you install. For most of the Adobe programs required hard drive storage is minimal and pretty much any computer that meets the system requirements for CC2015 will be adapted. If you want more details, the size of the installed media is listed on this page: Adobe CC 2015 Direct Download Links: Creative Cloud 2015 Release | ProDesignTools. I wish I could give you a number fast and strong, but I hope that gives you an idea.

  Best,

  Del

• I tried to download Adobe Premier on my Macbook Pro and it says I don't have enough room.  How much room do I need?  If I use the cloud version, how much room do I need?

  I tried to download Adobe Premier on my Macbook Pro and it says I don't have enough room.  How much room do I need?  If I use the cloud version, how much room do I need?

  Mac OS

  • Processor Intel multicore with 64-bit support
  • Mac OS X v10.9 or v10.10
  • 4 GB of RAM (8 GB recommended)
  • 4 GB of disk space available for installation. additional space required during installation (cannot install on a volume that uses a case-sensitive file system or on removable flash storage devices)
  • Additional space required for preview files and other files to work (10 GB recommended)
  • 1280 x 800 display
  • Hard drive 7200 RPM (multiple fast disks configured in RAID 0 recommended)
  • QuickTime 7.6.6 software required for QuickTime features
  • In option: GPU card Certified Adobe for GPU acceleration
  • Recording and Internet connection are necessary for activation of the software required, validation of subscriptions, online access to services *.

• Support of cluster consistency created how much cache?

  Hello
  
  I'm runing Oracle coherence GE 3.6.1 clustered.
  
  Support of cluster consistency created how much cache? type of cache is a distributed Cache.
  Cache of overcrowding affects the performance of the pole?
  
  Thank you!

  Hello

  Your test is probably not very representative of a real system. Have you run this test with just a single JVM? In the real world you could run a cluster of a number of Java virtual machines.

  In removeStartWith what you do is iterate over the set of keys to cache and to keep a number of keys - that is going to be fast in a single machine virtual JAVA.
  In removeLike you do a query to filter on the cache and consistency builds a new set to match the keys. It's a lot more work and therefore slower.

  Your two method names are called "removeXXX' althpough, you do not actually remove anything. If you want to delete the corresponding entries or your methods are very effective ways to make the operation you are trying. With a good group, average the most effective to remove all entries that are preceded by a given string would be something like this...

  Filter filter = new LikeFilter(new KeyExtractor(), regex + "%", (char)0, false);
  nc.invokeAll(filter, new ConditionalRemove(AlwaysFilter.INSTANCE));
  

  In the above code, the delete operation will happen on the cluster and will be distributed across all nodes in the cluster at the same time will be faster that bringing so everything they touch back and remove them one at a time as you do.

  In a true cluster works on the cluster where data is usually much more efficient and faster. If you do performance test there is no point in an environment that is not representative of a real-world deployment.

  JK

• How much time does it take for consistency detect node failure?

  Hello everyone
  
  We have an application that, among other things, using a call to NamedCache.invoke (object, InvocableMap.EntryProcessor)
  distribute work to agents hosted in about 80 JVMs, different with each probably manages a portion of the cache
  key range. In the present case, the cache is managed by a service with a backup-counter 0. EntryProcessor agents
  "on the other side" get an entry based on the key value and put it in the cache. Our questions:
  -If a JVM that hosts the service fails all of a sudden, how much time it take the coherence length to detect failure?
  -How long it take consistency to move the key range that manages a server failing to another JVM?
  -Are the requests sent through InvocableMap.invoke () be queued or retried when the key refers to a series of treaties
  by a failed server?
  
  It is feared that we can face visible to the user failures using a cache in a service with a backup-counter 0.
  
  Thanks for any help
  -Mike Murphy
  
  P. S.
  Sorry for the user1172219 user id tag - I understand that it will take an hour or two for a new handle to appear.

  Mike_M wrote:
  Hello everyone

  We have an application that, among other things, using a call to NamedCache.invoke (object, InvocableMap.EntryProcessor)
  distribute work to agents hosted in about 80 JVMs, different with each probably manages a portion of the cache
  key range. In the present case, the cache is managed by a service with a backup-counter 0. EntryProcessor agents
  "on the other side" get an entry based on the key value and put it in the cache. Our questions:

  -If a JVM that hosts the service fails all of a sudden, how much time it take the coherence length to detect failure?

  Depends on coherence version 3.6 running dead ping detection database too is really very fast (about 1 seconds, I think).
  detection of death based on ping earlier or not running is a bit slower, but still fast enough.

  -How long it take consistency to move the key range that manages a server failing to another JVM?

  If you have a backup-counter 0, you will lose all data in partitions in the abnormally missing node. That's why these partitions will bleed on their new owner, and this mission is quite fast. On the other hand, some other partitions must be rebalanced, which can take some time depending on the size of data.

  -Are the requests sent through InvocableMap.invoke () be queued or retried when the key refers to a series of treaties
  by a failed server?

  They can be retried, but since you have lost the partition, you can end up with incorrect data. I don't know what is really happening in this case.

  >

  It is feared that we can face visible to the user failures using a cache in a service with a backup-counter 0.

  It depends on what your application, if the content of the cache is missing.

  Best regards

  Robert

• How much slowing down video of slow mo?

  Hey everybody,

  I'm trying to understand the function of slow-mo of the iPad 2 a little better.

  I see that he shoots at 120FPS from the apple site:

  http://www.Apple.com/UK/iPad-air-2/specs/

  Anyone know what rate it plays back videos in? I'm figuring how much it slows the video so if you know that, it would also be useful.

  Thank you

  Joseph

  The user guide. Normal is 30 images/s, slo - mo is 120 FPS so I would say it's the quarter speed.

  "Shoot video.

  With camera, you can record videos, including videos of idle and accelerated.

  Record a video. Select the video, and then press the save or press a volume button, to start and stop recording. You can choose to capture 720 p or 1080 p at 30 fps (frames will Flash). You can also capture 1080 p at 60 frames per second and 4K video at 30 frames per second video on iPad Pro (9.7 inches). To change the settings for video recording, go to settings > camera & photo > video recording.

  Take it slow. (Pro, iPad 2 Air, mini iPad iPad 4) Choose the Slo - mo to capture video of idle at 120 frames per second. Later, when you change the video, you can simply set a part of it to read at idle, and the rest reads at normal speed. On iPad Pro (9.7 inches), you can choose between 120 fps and 240 frames per second. To change the settings of Slo - mo, go to settings > camera & photo > recording Slo - mo. »

  From: Apple Inc. "iPad for iOS 10 user's Guide." Apple Inc., 2016. iBooks.

  These documents can be protected by copyright.

  Find this book on the iBook Store: https://itun.es/us/Cf0Odb.l

• How much would it cost to repair iphone screen 6 in India?

  Hi everyone, in fact my 6 Iphone screen does not work correctly if I want to change the screen so I want to know how much it would cost me if want to replace the screen on the apple store.

  Check the Apple.com website in your country. The United States is support.apple.com that lists the repair costs.

  In the United States, it is $129 plus tax (without AppleCare +) or $29 (with AppleCare +). More than likely the price will vary in your country.

  Here is a link to the India English website: https://support.apple.com/en-in/iphone/repair/service