How to exclude subsidies, the role_grant, the materialized view to expdp
Hi all
I am making the expdp on a 10g database and import it on 11g:
Directory system/amandla expdp = respaldos_bd = logfile = nomina_dp.log patterns nomina_dp.dmp dumpfile = nomina exclude = grants, statistics, role_grant, db_link, materialized_view, materialized_view_log
Now, on the import subsidies, role grants etc are present on dumpfile as seen on warnings such as these:
ORA-39083: Fallo Creacia³n del tipo object OBJECT_GRANT con el error:
ORA-01917: el usuario o rol 'NOMINA_ART_SSALUD' doesn't exist
Procesando el tipo object SCHEMA_EXPORT/TABLE/SCHOLARSHIP/OWNER_GRANT/OBJECT_GRANT
ORA-39083: Fallo Creacia³n del tipo object OBJECT_GRANT con el error:
ORA-01917: el usuario o rol 'NOMINA_ART_EOS' doesn't exist
GRANT SELECT ON "NOMINA". "' CONC_IVSS ' TO 'NOMINA_ART '.
ORA-39083: Fallo Creacia³n del tipo object OBJECT_GRANT con el error:
ORA-01917: el usuario o rol 'NOMINA_ART' doesn't exist
What's not here?
Thanks in advance!
Hi Richard,
Yes you are right, thank you. grant to exclude will remove all subsidies.
just checked command OPs on 11.2.0.4 and exclure = grants work done and it failed object and system privileges granted to the user as well.
Tags: Database
Similar Questions
-
How to exclude from the SOUL of the rules if the invoice distribution amount is < 0 (i.e. the negative amount) to the existing rule.
Requirement: I have an obligation to send the invoice approval group approval specified when the invoice distribution account is 4567 and charge the amount of distribution > 0
Finished configurations:
- Set condition: the string value to using 4567 supplier_invoice_distribution_gl_account attribute
- The condition set: SUPPLIER_INVOICE_DISTRIBUTION_AMOUNT is greater than or equal to 0
- Definition of new rule setting the terms of the 1st and 2nd stage and also group attached to this rule approval
Note: Approval is not required is defined for invoices IN. matched in SOUL.
Test case:
- Corresponding invoice with PO (PO amount is 8000)
- Amount of invoice header 5000
- Distribution account invoice 5568 as well as the amount is 8000
- Inserted 4567 distribution and quantity is - 3000
Behavior of real: system sends the approval of the Bill for approval related group account 4567
Expected behavior: invoice approval status should be 'Not necessary', since it is a corresponding purchase order invoice and 4567 account amount is < 0
Kindly let me know how to set the rule to exclude the ve - amount distribution associated with lines
Hello
Then set a rule all 3 conditions:
If attribute SUPPLIER_INVOICE_DISTRIBUTION_PO_MATCHED = No. and the SUPPLIER_INVOICE_DISTRIBUTION_AMOUNT attribute is less than the 0 attribute and supplier_invoice_distribution_account = <> then no permission.
Concerning
Yvette
-
How to improve the materialized view Refresh speed?
Hello
Are there tips to improve the speed of refresh of the materialized views?
All documentation or advice are appreciated!
Thank you!Agree with S_Lindenmayr, if possible, the fast refresh should be used to speed up the update because it syncs MV with only the changes since the previous update (instead of the refresh). To implement the Fatst update, fortunately, with 10 g +, Oracle provides a counselor with the TUNE_MVIEW procedure. Step by step to find in week 12 of the Top 20 features the famous Arup Nanda 10 g for the series of DBA http://www.oracle.com/technology/pub/articles/10gdba/week12_10gdba.html
Tarraf
-
Trigger on the materialized view
Hello
I have the scenario based (Database 11 g):
There is a view materialized (PERSON), which contains the ID and NAME fields. This MV is update daily with a fast refresh.
I have a second array (NAMES), with ID and NORM_NAME. This table contains the name of the person, without special characters.
For example, for recording / * 1 BJORN * / in the PERSON table
I would check * 1 BJORN * / in table NAMES.
Problem is how to fill the NAME table after the filling of the materialized view.
I used a trigger AFTER INSERT or update, as described below, but even if I update the master table (for this purpose, update the MV), I have only to trigger inserts.
Is there a way to implement a trigger "after update" on a materialized view, or do I need another approach?
/*
create or replace TRIGGER TRG_TESTE_MV
AFTER INSERT OR UPDATE ON THE PERSON
REFERENCING OLD AS OLD AGAIN AS NEW
FOR EACH LINE
BEGIN
IF THE INSERTION
INSERT THE NAMES
VALUES
(: NEW.id,:NEW.NAME);
END IF;
IF THE UPDATE CAN
UPDATE OF NAMES
SET NAME =: NEW.NAME WHERE ID =: NEW.id;
END IF;
END;
*/
Thanks for any help
Your trigger fires, but I doubted that you will be satisfied with the results. You really need to understand how to refresh process works before you begin creating triggers of MV:
SQL > create table emp1 in select * from EMP
2.Table created.
SQL > create materialized view emp1 with rowid journal
2.Materialized view log that is created.
SQL > create materialized view emp1_mv
2 fast refresh
3 on request
4 with rowid
5 as
6 select * from emp1
7.Materialized view created.
SQL > create or replace
trigger 2 emp1_mv_biudr
3 before inserting
4 or update
5 or delete
6 on emp1_mv
7 for each line
Start 8
9 insert then dbms_output.put_line ('INSERT' |: new.ename); end if;
10 if the deletion then dbms_output.put_line ('REMOVE' |: old.ename); end if;
11 end;
12.Trigger created.
SQL > insert
2 in emp1 (empno, ename, sal)
3 values(1,'X',1000)
4.1 line of creation.
SQL > validation
2.Validation complete.
SQL > set serveroutput on
SQL > exec dbms_mview.refresh ('emp1_mv', 'f');
INSERTION OF XPL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL > update emp1
2 set sal = sal + 1
3 where ename ('King', 'JONES')
4.2 lines to date.
SQL > validation
2.Validation complete.
SQL > set serveroutput on
SQL > exec dbms_mview.refresh ('emp1_mv', 'f');
INSERTION OF JONES
INSERTION OF KINGPL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL > delete emp1
2 where in ename ('ALLEN', 'SMITH')
3.2 deleted rows.
SQL > validation
2.Validation complete.
SQL > set serveroutput on
SQL > exec dbms_mview.refresh ('emp1_mv', 'f');PL/SQL procedure successfully completed.
SQL >
As you can see, refresh MV updates ever. Results update underlying table to remove/insert in MV. That's why your trigger will not give the results that you expected.
SY.
-
Experts,
I'm trying to create a YOUNG refreshable ON COMMIT MV (xyz) using a table (circuit) and quickly updateable on validation MV (abc), but get an error:
SQL error: ORA-12054: cannot set the attribute ON COMMIT refresh for the materialized view
12054 00000 - "cannot set the refresh attribute COMMIT for the materialized view.
* Cause: The materialized view did not meet the requirements for update to
moment of validation.
* Action: Specify only valid options.
1] MV abc
= MV abc defined as below =.CREATE MATERIALIZED view abc_MV
Immediate CONSTRUCTION
REFRESH QUICKLY YOU COMMIT using constraints of trust
WITH ROWID AS SELECT n.*,.
n.ROWID noderowid
node n
where n.nodetype in (1610000069,1610007267);
-Above works OK and MV connect you on table node is created successfully
=====================================================
[ 2] Circuit Board
======================================================
CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW LOG ON Cramer.Circuit WITH SEQUENCE, ROWID ( ) -all columns of table ofcircut parentheses
INCLUDING THE NEW VALUES;
-More top works OK and MV connect you on table circuit is created successfully
======================================================
[3] trying to create MV xyz
======================================================
CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW LOG ON cramer.abc_MV WITH SEQUENCE, ROWID ( ) -all columns of abc_MV brackets
INCLUDING THE NEW VALUES;
-Above works OK and log on ABC MV MV gets created successfully
-Problematic step below
Xyz_MV CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW
IMMEDIATE CONSTRUCTION
REFRESH QUICKLY YOU COMMIT using constraints of trust
AS
SELECT c., c.rowid circuit_rowid, n.rowid tr_rowid
the circuit c, abc_mv n
where circuit2startnode = n.nodeid
and c.rpplanId = n.rpplanId;
==========================================================Clues on how to solve this problem and make quickly updatable ON Commit MV xyz
Thanks in advance.
Chanchal,
If you can read my original post carefully you may have noticed that all these restrictions will not apply in my case.
All,
In any case I found the solution to my problem.
There are a few additional restrictions for materialized views multilayer
Additional Restrictions for master materialized views
The following types of materialized views may not be masters of editable materialized views:
ROWID
materialized views- Complex materialized views
- Read-only materialized views
I've updated the underlying MV abc below and everything worked like a charm
CREATE MATERIALIZED view abc_MV
Immediate CONSTRUCTION
REFRESH QUICKLY YOU COMMIT using constraints of trust
IN SELECT
n.*, n.rowid noderowid, nt.rowid nodetyperowid
the node n, nodetype_m nt
where n.node2nodetype = nt.nodetypeid
and nt.nodetypeid in (1610000069,1610007267);
Note: To ADD a join without which I was getting error below (although had primary key on the table of the node)
SQL error: ORA-23415: materialized view log for "NODE" does not save the primary key
23415 00000 - "view the log for materialized \"%s\".\"%s\"does not save the primary key.
* Cause: A primary key materialized view is refreshed quickly, but the
The materialized view log does not record the primary key information.
* Action: Use CREATING MATERIALIZED VIEW LOG... Command to add a PRIMARY KEY to
start recording of the primary key information in the materialized view
Newspaper.
-
Re: view opaque and the materialized view
Hi Experts,
I want some clarification of opaque and view view in the physical layer OBIEE materialized
-> what is the main difference between the opaque view and materialized in the RPD perspective view, we have to do this at the level of the RPD or DB.
-> I want the list of opaque opinion and materialized in the RPD view how I should do.
-> How opaque views will degrade the performance and how a materialized view will improve performance at the level of the report.
-> In scenarios that we use view opaque and the view materialized (if possible with a scenario for the best permanent basis).
Thanks in advance.
I want some clarification of opaque and view view in the physical layer OBIEE materialized
-> What is the main difference between opaque view and create the materialized view in the RPD point of view, we have to do this at the level of the RPD or DB.
Opaque views is a SQL statement that is defined in the physical layer, OBIEE will use all in the construction of a SQL query. In a way it's not different from a database view, except it is set in OBIEE only. Alternatively, you can deploy an Opaque view, which pushes its definition in the database. Read more about it here: work with physical tables, Cubes and joins - 11 g Release 1 (11.1.1)
A materialized view (MV) is a database concept where the results of a SQL statement are physicalised like a table, and therefore as OBIEE is a MV is just another physical array
-> If I want a list of the opaque views and materialized in the RPD view how I should do.
To find opaque views, use the function «Repository of applications» administration tool Search physical Tables and set up a filter on the Type = Select
Screenshot: https://www.evernote.com/shard/s16/sh/5c843e47-bff1-4d4b-b847-be98f3a2ec09/cf060a6cd9805f687fa0b5b46f3f0020
To find materialized views, you will need to query the catalog in your database (for example select object_name, object_type from user_objects where type_objet = "MATERIALIZED VIEW" ;) and compare it to the list of tables in your SPR)
-> How opaque views will degrade the performance and how a materialized view will improve performance at the level of the report.
A materialized view is materialized, in other words, the results are already stored in the database. This means usually there will be more efficient because all the joins and aggregations, etc. will be settled in advance.
-
Refresh the Materialized View constructed from an external table commit?
Is it possible to create a materialized with Refresh view on commit built from an external table?
I think the answer is "no, because there is no way for the outer table report to the view materialized it has been changed," but I would like to be sure before I tell my client who has requested the opportunity to do this (or, Alternatively, to learn how Oracle hoops I have to cross in order to operate).
I can create a Refresh on demand, it is not a question of not having the necessary permissions to create the materialized view itself.No, you can't. The outer table is not modified in a transactional way and there no materialized view logs, so there is no event to hang in and no delta to apply.
However, you can use dbms_scheduler observer file that will ask for the presence of a file and load the data in a table or refresh a materialized view based on the external table.
Justin
-
I just created a view, materialized; I have to analyze the materialized view after getting created? If so, how it will impact performance.
user3636719 wrote:
select * from v$version; Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.5.0 - 64bi PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.5.0 - Production "CORE 10.2.0.5.0 Production" TNS for HPUX: Version 10.2.0.5.0 - Production NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.5.0 - Production
default V10 is statistics to collect once every 24 hours.
so if you do nothing, the MV will be tomorrow at this time stats -
question on the materialized view unregistered on the main site
Hello
you know how one knows, on the main site, on the existence of a materialized view another site referring to other tables to a primary site. It seems registration is not required.
the site main orcl1: I have a table, and a materialized view log defined on A table.
another site orcl2: have a link db orcl1 and rapid updatable view SCOTT materialized. A_MVW (create a materialized view A_MVW cool off quickly in select * from A@orcl1)
on orcl1 I perform: exec DBMS_MVIEW. UNREGISTER_MVIEW (mviewowner = > 'SCOTT', mviewname = > mviewsite, 'A_MVW' = > 'ORCL2');
so the materialized view seems to be correctly set aside (because it no longer appears in: select * from DBA_REGISTERED_MVIEWS ;))
But, to my surprise, I can still perform refreshes fast on A_MVW, which also remove rows from the materialized view log. So how is site orcl1 always aware of the existence of the materialized view?
It seems that, registered or not to the main site, a materialized view has the same... or is not? where is it stored, on the main site, information about materialized views (especially those of quickly updatable) as local tables reffer?
Thank youSee DocIDs 258634.1, 67371.1, 1031924.6
on Oracle's Support website.Hemant K Collette
-
Difference between the view and the materialized view
Hi all
Can someone tell me exactly the difference between the view and materialized views?Hello
View:-this is a virtual table means table is there, but in fact is not there...
see how to create a view...create or replace view aaa as select * from emp;
Now, when we choose the AAA, he will show me all the data that would be returned by running a query "Select * from emp"... Thus, all data will come from table iteself.
View in itself is nothing but just a Sql statement that is used to create the view, in this case definition is "select * from emp.
Any update in the database table Emp which is in our case, would automatically result in the view...
Any changes (all dml) will actually update the base table (conditions apply *)Now the materialized view:-this is the same as except that it is not a virtual table... This will be created separately and it will acutally hold the result of the query that is used to create it. Any subsequent changes in the base table only will be included in the opinion of M M view is refreshed...
-
The Materialized View - ORA-12052: is unable to fast refresh materialized view
Hello
I was hitting my head all day trying to create materialized views. I have made some progress, but have hit a brick wall, unfortunately!
Basically, I have been invited to take a view and see if I can get the benefits of performance by transforming all or part of it in materialized views. Because the underlying tables of the config is updated quite frequently, I want to fast refresh materialized views on commit. However, when I try to create a materialized view containing an outer join in an aggregated materialized view table, I get ORA-12052: is unable to fast refresh materialized view.
I went through the documentation and also Rob van Wijkvery useful series of blogs on the topic (especially http://rwijk.blogspot.co.uk/2009/09/fast-refreshable-materialized-view.html) but have not found anything that matches. Maybe I missed something somewhere along the line, or maybe I'm asking just something completely impossible?
My db is 11.2.0.2.
Here's the test scripts, I've worked with that:
drop materialized view test1_test2_mv;
Drop materialized view test2 journal;
drop table test2;
Drop materialized view test1_mv newspaper;
drop materialized view test1_mv;
Drop materialized view test1 journal;
drop table test1;create table test1 (identification number,
type varchar2 (10),
number of Val,
update_time date,
constraint t1_pk primary key (id, type, val));
Insert into test1
Select 1, 'a', 1001, sysdate - 10/24 Union double all the
Select 1, 'b', 1003, sysdate - 9/24 Union double all the
Select 1, 'c', 1002, sysdate - 8/24 Union double all the
Select 1, had ', 1004, sysdate - 7/24 Union double all the
Select 1, 'e', 1005, sysdate - 6/24 Union double all the
Select 1, 'c', 1006, sysdate - 5/24 Union double all the
Select 2, 'a', 1002, sysdate - 4/24 Union double all the
Select 2, 'b', 1005, sysdate - 3/24 Union double all the
Select 3, 'a', 1001, sysdate - 2/24 Union double all the
Select 3, 'c', 1006, sysdate - 1/24 Union double all the
Select 3, 'e', 1008, sysdate - 2/24 Union double all the
Select option 4, has ', 1004, sysdate - 3/24 Union double all the
Select 5, 'b', 1002, sysdate - 4/24 Union double all the
Select 5, 'g', 1001, sysdate - 5/24 Union double all the
Select 6, 'h', 1004, sysdate - 6/24 Union double all the
Select 7, 'b', 1007, sysdate - 7/24 Union double all the
Select 7, had ', 1001, sysdate - 8/24 double;commit;
Select * from test1;
CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW LOG ON test1
WITH rowid, primary key (update_time)
including the new values;
Test1_mv CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW
IMMEDIATE CONSTRUCTION
COOL OFF QUICKLY ON COMMIT
Did YOU SELECT id,
MAX (case when type = "there" end of val) THAT col_a,.
MAX (case when type = 'b', then val end) AS col_b,.
MAX (case when type = 'c' then end val) AS col_c,.
MAX (case when type = ' then end of val) AS col_d,
MAX (update_time) AS update_time
OF test1
WHERE TYPE in ('a',
« b »,
« c »,
a ')
GROUP BY id;CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW LOG ON test1_mv
WITH rowid
including the new values;
create table test2 (identification number,
col2 number,
COL3 varchar2 (10),
number of COL4,
constraint t2_pk primary key (id));
Insert into test2
Select 1, 1, 'bob', 1 double Union all
Select 2, 1, "sue", 1 double Union all
Select 3, 1, 'tom', 1 double Union all
Select 4, 1, 'jay', 1 double Union all
Select 5, 1, 'art', 1 double Union all
Select 6, 1, 'kay', 1 double Union all
Select 7, 1, 'max', 1 double Union all
Select 8, 1, 'tim', 1 double Union all
Select 9, 1, "liz", 1 from dual;commit;
CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW LOG ON test2
WITH rowid, primary key
including the new values;
Test1_test2_mv CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW
IMMEDIATE CONSTRUCTION
COOL OFF QUICKLY ON COMMIT
LIKE SOME t2.rowid,.
T1.ID,
T1.col_a,
T1.col_b,
T1.col_c,
T1.col_d,
T1.update_time,
T2.col2,
T2. COL3
OF test1_mv t1,.
Test2 t2
WHERE (+) t1.id = t2.id; -symbol of outer join is not correctly displayed on the forums without space, grr!ORA-12052: is unable to fast refresh materialized view TEST1_TEST2_MV
Y at - it any way I can get the materialized view fast refresh on commit or I asking the impossible?
Add t1.rowid:
SQL > CREATE MATERIALIZED VIEW test1_test2_mv
2 BUILD IMMEDIATE
3 QUICK REFRESH YOU COMMIT
4 AS t2.rowid SELECT rid2,
5 t1.rowid rid1,
6 t1.id
T1.col_a 7,.
T1.col_b 8,.
T1.col_c 9,.
T1.col_d 10,
T1.update_time 11,
T2.col2 12,
13 t2.col3
14 OF test1_mv t1,
15 test2 T2
16 WHERE t1.id = t2.id
17.
Materialized view created.
SQL > select * from test1_test2_mv
2.
RID2 RID1 ID COL_A, COL_B, COL_C COL_D UPDATE_TIME COL2 COL3
------------------ ------------------ ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ------------------- ---------- ----------
AAAYB6AANAAAANDAAA AAAYB/AANAAAAN/AAA 1 1001 1003 1006 1004 25 / 06 / 2014 12:54:16 1 bob
AAAYB6AANAAAANDAAB AAAYB/AANAAAAN/AAB 2 1002 1005 25 / 06 / 2014 1 sue 14:54:16
AAAYB6AANAAAANDAAC AAAYB/AANAAAAN/AAC 3 1001 1006 25 / 06 / 2014 16:54:16 1 tom
AAAYB/AANAAAAN/AAD AAAYB6AANAAAANDAAD 4 1004 25/06/2014 14:54:16 1 jay
AAAYB6AANAAAANDAAE AAAYB / AANAAAAN / AAE 5 1002 2014/06/25 13:54:16 1 art
AAAYB6AANAAAANDAAF AAAYB/AANAAAAN/AAG 7 1007 1009 25 / 06 / 2014 10:54:16 max 1
AAAYB/AANAAAAN/AAH 1 tim
AAAYB/AANAAAAN/AAF 1 kay
AAAYB/AANAAAAN/AAI 1 liz
9 selected lines.
SQL > update of test2
2 set col3 = "fly."
3 where id = 7
6 m
1 line update.
SQL > validation
2.
Validation complete.
SQL > select * from test1_test2_mv
2.
RID2 RID1 ID COL_A, COL_B, COL_C COL_D UPDATE_TIME COL2 COL3
------------------ ------------------ ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- ------------------- ---------- ----------
AAAYB6AANAAAANDAAA AAAYB/AANAAAAN/AAA 1 1001 1003 1006 1004 25 / 06 / 2014 12:54:16 1 bob
AAAYB6AANAAAANDAAB AAAYB/AANAAAAN/AAB 2 1002 1005 25 / 06 / 2014 1 sue 14:54:16
AAAYB6AANAAAANDAAC AAAYB/AANAAAAN/AAC 3 1001 1006 25 / 06 / 2014 16:54:16 1 tom
AAAYB/AANAAAAN/AAD AAAYB6AANAAAANDAAD 4 1004 25/06/2014 14:54:16 1 jay
AAAYB6AANAAAANDAAE AAAYB / AANAAAAN / AAE 5 1002 2014/06/25 13:54:16 1 art
AAAYB/AANAAAAN/AAH 1 tim
AAAYB/AANAAAAN/AAF 1 kay
AAAYB/AANAAAAN/AAI 1 liz
AAAYB6AANAAAANDAAF AAAYB/AANAAAAN/AAG 7 1007 1009 25 / 06 / 2014 10:54:16 1 rob
9 selected lines.
-
Do not to use the materialized view
I wonder if we've already created a materialized view, can we prefer not to use this point of view, materialized for a query? I want to say can we determine if a query uses MV and other queries don't use MV? Thank you.
Hello Indra,
I'm not completely sure about that, but you can read (with examples) concerning the indications- NO_REWRITE and REWRITE
Text over the doc links:
Council of REWRITING:
The
REWRITE
Council instructs the optimizer to rewrite a query regarding the materialized views when possible, regardless of cost. Use theREWRITE
trick with or without a display list. If you useREWRITE
with a view list and the list contains an eligible materialized view, then Oracle uses this view regardless of its cost.Tip NO_REWRITE:
The
NO_REWRITE
Council tells the optimizer to disable the rewrite of the query to the query block, of the substitution of the definition of the parameterQUERY_REWRITE_ENABLED
.Be aware! -The
NOREWRITE
suspicion has been deprecated. Use theNO_REWRITE
hint instead.Read here: setting QUERY_REWRITE_ENABLED
-Nordine
-
Change the definition of the materialized view while maintaining access for users uninteruupted
Hello
We have a system report and the need to change the report definition mv access - like to do it without interruption.
Is this possible?
the sql behind mv was change picks up so column of another table.
Have you heard but not used for dbms_redefinition tables
Thank you
It is built in the Oracle solution for this one, where you can edit the definition WITHOUT interruption. You can drop the materialized view existing with the clause "save table" and rebuilt the view materialized on 'predefined table'. I googled this example for you
create materialized view mv1 as select dept , count(*) as cnt from scott.emp;
We want to change the statement so that only dept more 5 will be calculated
drop materialized view mv1 preserve table;
Notice that
PRESERVE TABLE
clause - mv1 table is not droped - single layer mview.desc mv1
now, we create the mview with a different query on top of the existing table
create materialized view mv1 on prebuilt table as select dept , count(*) as cnt from scott.emp where dept > 5;
Notice that
on prebuilt table
the mview uses the existing object clause.exec dbms_mview.refresh_mview('mv1');
http://StackOverflow.com/questions/18085894/redefine-MATERIALIZED-view-with-no-downtime
http://Arup.blogspot.com/2009/01/ultra-fast-MV-alteration-using-prebuilt.html
-
Hi there, bit of a newcomer to this, trying to teach some aspects of digital Editions and find my way through. How do I access the content viewer for preview of the interactive features before you build a custom Viewer?
Download from the Marketplace for your device (iTunes, Google Play, Windows Store).
You might find our useful post learning resources: https://forums.adobe.com/thread/994742.
Neil
-
Elapsed time for the materialized view vs Master table query
Hello all;
Small confusion about time up for the vs Master materialized view table query
SQL > select count (*), sum (quan_sold), sum (amt_sold) of the sale;
COUNT (*) SUM (QUAN_SOLD) SUM (AMT_SOLD)
6000000 12000000 720480000
Elapsed time: 00:00:30.54
SQL > create materialized view mv1
Materialized view created.
2 activate the rewrite of the query as
3. select count (*), sum (quan_sold), sum (amt_sold) of the sale;
Elapsed time: 00:00:01.45
SQL > select count (*), sum (quan_sold), sum (amt_sold) of the sale;
COUNT (*) SUM (QUAN_SOLD) SUM (AMT_SOLD)
6000000 12000000 720480000
Elapsed time: 00:00:00.01
Please see the three cases "Elapsed Time"...
When comparing other cases.
1. my query takes long time (30.54), extraction of data from the sale
2. create a materialized view takes less time (01:45) why?
Source: http://uhesse.com/2009/07/08/brief-introduction-into-materialized-views/>
Small confusion about elapsed time for the materialized view vs Master table querySQL > select count (*), sum (quan_sold), sum (amt_sold) from the sale.
COUNT (*) SUM (QUAN_SOLD) SUM (AMT_SOLD)
6000000 12000000 720480000
Elapsed time: 00:00:30.54SQL > create materialized view mv1
2 activate the rewrite of the query as
3. select count (*), sum (quan_sold), sum (amt_sold) of the sale;
Materialized view created.
Elapsed time: 00:00:01.45SQL > select count (*), sum (quan_sold), sum (amt_sold) from the sale.
COUNT (*) SUM (QUAN_SOLD) SUM (AMT_SOLD)
6000000 12000000 720480000
Elapsed time: 00:00:00.01Please see the three cases "Elapsed Time"...
When comparing other cases.
1. my query takes long time (30.54), extraction of data from the sale
2. create a materialized view takes less time (01:45) why?
>
Many queries take less time the second time you run them. After the first performance, there may be many, if not all, lines in the buffer cache. Then the second round will not make any or all e/s physical but will obtain data from the buffer cache.Also, you haven't checked that the MV was even used for the second run.
Drop the MV and make the query several times and means of the time. Then create the MV and do the same thing.
Maybe you are looking for
-
I have an IMAC of 2008 with 2 GB of memory plus 300 GB of storage. If I buy 2GB of memory I'll be able to download Sierra?
-
Struggling to maintain flows RSS feeds podcast in iTunes
I submitted my podcast on iTunes and it pulls in the RSS of Soundcloud stream where I host it. https://iTunes.Apple.com/GB/podcast/inverted-whingers-football/id1078584946?MT=2 I would like to be able to see how many subscribers I get and understand t
-
Halo Combat Evolved does not work on my windows 7 64-bit
When I try to install halo the window freezes and goes no further. When I tried to find a solution all the saying, this is the autorun file no longer meets the windows. How can I solve this problem?
-
Password for connection to Windows 2000 Professional
It's been so long since I was in my computer (had to put in storage for a few years) that I don't remember my personal to enter computer login. I need to know how can I reload the software or something to be able to get new. Help!
-
HP Photosmart 5520 - cartridges installation use
Hello We just bought the printer HP Photosmart 5520 tonight and I'm unable to set up. We used the ink comes in the box, but we have an error message telling us to use cartridges SETUP. How to progress from here? Thank you.