Images is invisible in FCPX

Similar Questions

• Is it possible to define the image poster in browser FCPX?

  Is it possible to define the poster frame of the browser FCPX to the last frame of the clip?

  My use case:

  I have bunches of clips on a SD card, good and bad, taken from several scenes. Clusters.

  Each bad take is cut while now a red card to the camera. So if I had some way of looking at the last picture of the clips, I would not put the clip in the timeline or skim even the clip had been sloppy and should be rejected. I have confirmed with Canon that our XA25 will only display the first image of the scene. FCPX seems to like to display the middlemost image like the poster. If it is can not editable in FCPX someone Adviser of another method?

  Thank you!

  You can post a screenshot of the place where in FCP you are talking about? The browser may display several images and view film, you can zoom in the film of the clip. There is no single framework for the poster frame.

• Placed Illustrator image is invisible in InDesign

  I have an Illustrator image made from a LiveTrace, only five colors, but a drawing together hundreds of small objects. When I try to put this in a graphic file in InDesign, it's invisible (although there is the sign of the target in the area of the image indicating that something is there). When I try to save the Illustrator file to PDF, I have the same blank page.

  I don't know there is something obvious, Miss me him, but I tried without success for half an hour to understand. It is ID CS5.5 and Illustrator CS5. Much obliged to anyone who can help out me.

  Rob

  There not printable? Perhaps as an attribute in Illustrator?

• I create an image composite and some I am trying to add images are invisible and I can't understand why.

  I guess I had too many things open and Photoshop a bit frozen. I closed everything and tried again. Everything worked!

  Hi wyowind15,

  Everything works well, or are you still face problems when creating a composite image in Photoshop?

• Container.Layout (invisible Images)

  Hello, I am looping through images in a file and adding them to a container where they will be added to a ScrollPane component. Before adding the container to ScrollPane I want container.layout ();. The problem with this is that container.layout () does not work when the objects inside are invisible.

  My images are invisible until they have finished loading. How can I run only container.layout () after all my images in the loop have finished loading?

  I doubt that there is a guarantee about the order in which the images will be load, to ensure that it is the "last image" may be difficult or unreliable.

  A simple approach would be to keep track of how many charges do you (increment a counter whenever you launch a charge or set a value for the number of images after all charges are made).  In the event that the Manager of decrement the count and, if it reaches zero, call Container.layout ().

  You can also call available after each event complete... which is even more simple and not a problem if there is no too much of.  If it takes a little time to load, it will be even better for the user.

  If there are a lot of pictures and loading would take some time, but there is an advantage to update the layout in the form of images loaded, you could get more complicated too.  More complete each load, call layout() again if it has not been called at the last second, or if it's the last image (again using the meter).  This way gets it the user an indication of progress and progressive display of images, but you don't waste time making updates after each image.

• Certain images (not all) on my site just stopped from appearing only in Firefox - why?

  Years, I ran a website for a benefit concert: http://singtocurems.org/

  I give the advertising for businesses who donate to the charity I'm raises funds for displaying the logos and links on my site - for example, last year sponsorship page:
  http://singtocurems.org/2013/sponsors.shtml
  This has always been a positive question for everyone.

  Suddenly, the images are invisible on Firefox, although they are visible in Safari and Chrome. I followed all your advice, but see no change.
  What is going on?!

  Hello MarionMusic, since the images have the path /sponsor-ad / they are probably blocked by one of your subscriptions list of adblock filters more extension...

• Are there already experiments with FM 2015, scaling of the image to its original size in the HTML output

  FM 12 provides the following procedure (as read in the manual) to see the images in original size in the HTML output. I did and was happy. But now in 2015 of the FM, the operation is no more.

  > >

  In the Setup file (settings.sts) you can set the image (default size) the parameters width and height to 0pt so that images in the HTML output are displayed in the original format. FM 12 it worked fine. The result was, that the style to the statement tag < img > is deleted in the HTML code output, so that the images keep their original size. But now in 2015 FM it seems there is a bug. The same procedure has the effect that the style statement is in the HTML (is not deleted) and width and height are on 0x0pt. The result is that all the images are invisible. If I disabled 'Preferred size' images in the HTML output are always scaled down in a 'random' size, nobody knows where it comes and how I can trouble or spend that in 2015 scaling of FM.
  

  > >
  

  Anyone who has ever even erperiences with the new 2015 FM?

  THX
  

  Hello

  There was a bug in the publication process of FrameMaker for which we had planned a work around to set the width and height 0pt. Now we have fixed the issue when you set 0pt as the width images will no longer appear.

  Now in your output images will seem to have the same size, such that they appear in the documents of source if preferred size is not defined. If this isn't the case, you can share your example of source document so that we can have a look.

  Thank you

  Ritesh Kumar

  [email protected]

• Satellite Pro U400 VISTA disk management has 6 primary partitions

  Hi all!

  I have a strange effect on my Toshiba laptop Satellite Pro U400 (but it seems not to be specific to this one that I saw the same symptoms elsewhere, at the same time):

  I had the laptop with a 320 GB drive with recovery-(invisible / "Configuration EISA", 1,46 Go) system (C:, ~ 150 GB) and data (E:, ~ 150 GB) volumes. It's the usual structure of Toshiba,

  pre-installed OS was Vista professional.

  As I plan to install Linux in addition, I have done as a result of preparations:

  Recovery disc Vista created 1.).
  2.) C: shrunk to ~ 100 GB using Vista disk management tool.
  3.) E: shrunk to Go ~ 98 using Vista disk management tool.
  It is suggested that 4.) E: directly behind C: using Parted Magic CD.

  Finally I got a 97 GB of free space at the end of the disc, and everything worked well away. Creating an additional on the free area, Vista disk management, resulted in an extended partition created by Vista. This extended partition contained the extra volume as well as the free space remaining behind.

  To prepare for installing Linux, I've finally created three logical Volumes inside the extended partition with Vista disk management tool.
  After that, I had the following structure of the partition on the disk (indicated by the Vista Disk Manager):

  invisible 1.46 GB, primary
  C:, ~ 100 GB NTFS, primary, active, System
  E:, ~ 98 GB NTFS, primary, data

  ~ 97 GB extended partition, containing:
  2 GB unformatted (planned for Linux swap)
  20 GB unformatted (planned for Linux root "/")
  21 GB unformatted (planned for Linux "/ home")
  Empty remaining 54 GB space

  More on Vista worked properly!

  Recently, I installed OpenSuse 11.1 using the volumes placed within extended partitions (user-specific configuration). The Installation worked correctly. Logical volumes have been formatted to

  2 GB of swap (swap Linux, / dev/sda5)
  20 GB ext3 (Linux root ' / ' on/dev/sda6)
  21 GB unformatted (Linux "/ home" on/dev/sda6)

  during the installation of Linux. Linux and Vista up and running with their scores. If I look at the hard drive with Linux' partitioning tool, I see three main partitions + range, as expected. The scope contains the Linux partitions + empty disk space.

  HOWEVER:
  ========

  If I look at the hard drive with the Vista disk management tool now, I get the following image:

  invisible 1.46 GB, primary
  C:, ~ 100 GB NTFS, primary, active, System
  E:, ~ 98 GB NTFS, primary, data
  2 GB PRIMARY, no format info displayed
  20 GB PRIMARY, no format info displayed
  21 GB PRIMARY, no format info displayed
  Empty remaining 54 GB space

  This means:
  VISTA DISK MANAGMENT ME PRESENT 6 PRIMARY PARTITIONS WITHOUT ANY COMPLAIN
  Although a hard drive on the PC architecture usually only supports maximum 4 primary partitions.

  Issues related to the:

  Have you ever seen a similar behavior?

  Is this a bug of presentation in the Vista disk management tool?

  Or is it a bug in formatting under Linux?

  Is there a solution for this problem?

  At present, the two BONES work very well. However, the disk will be get permanently damaged as soon as I try to create more partitions in the empty space left?

  Sincere greetings and thanks for your comments.

  Girard

  > Have you ever see similar behavior?
  NO.

  > Is this a bug of presentation in the Vista disk management tool?
  I doubt that it is a bug, I think you forgot something.

  As far as I know you can create 4 partitions on the HARD drive and this is the reason why you have the ability to create an extended partition.
  An extended partition can be divided into several logical drives.

  That is why it s wise to create a primary partition for Windows OS for example and an extended partition, which can decompose the in logical drives (partitions) different.

  However, I put t see a problem if everything works properly

  Welcome them

• Lightroom updated without a doubt a step in the wrong direction!

  I apologize if this has already been posted, but I've noticed several new issues since the last update of Lightroom:

  1. when I drop the highlights (which I do on almost every picture) beyond-65, saturation suddenly goes haywire.  I'm used to seeing the adjustment applied gradually until I get something I like, but in the case of highlights, it reaches a point where it suddenly screws to the top of the color saturation. Now I have the additional task of setting that. Often, I already fixed the white balance, and which casts too.

  2. all the sliders settings create a "flickering" effect Again, I am used to seeing the adjustment I use gradually applied until I like what I see. Now each of them creates this flicker, which is very distracting. I often arbitrarily stop the cursor and wait for the flashing to stop before resuming again.  I must repeat this until I like the result. Again, it is creating extra work and take a lot more time.

  3 brush setting often allow me to drag it on the image. I choose a size of brush and setting and begin to move it on the image, and it stops at the edge.  The brush is actually on the image (although invisible) and if I click on the mouse, I can see where it is, but I can't until I have click to apply the adjustment, and more often, it is not where I want to.

  4. I've seen this mentioned, but thought I'd throw it too: HDR Panos almost always give me the message «the image seems» damaged  Give me a break. I do them in the same way that I always...

  This "update" is the only thing that has changed on my system (iMac 27 ", mid 2011). This makes my life VERY difficult. It takes me too long to pass the value 4 shoots photos so that I can offer to the final images to customers.

  Please correct.

  Try turning off graphics processor-

  Preferences > Performance - uncheck CPU graph use.

• Clipping mask

  Created a clipping mask (put an image in an object), to reduce the size of the image.

  Exported and the file is still the part of the image, although invisible, outside of the object.

  CreativeTreo,

  Outside this cropping in Photoshop, you can do the dirty work of destructive, with the selected clipping mask:

  (1) in the drop-down list the palette/Panel transparency list select everything except Normal (Multiply is fine; this step may not be necessary in your version, you can try;

  (2) object > flatten transparency, just keep the defaults including 100% vector.

  (3) thrill.

  That's all for the bounding box of the Clipping Path cultures.

• swapdepths problems

  Another problem arise!
  in an another movieclip in my scenario main 'folder '.
  I have the smaller movieclips inside again. However, these clips have a first blank image not appearing in searching for a declared variable that sends to the second image. on the second image, an invisible button allows the user to see a larger version of the small movieclip. Basically, it's an inventory, the items that appear only when they are "found" elsewhere in the draft.
  
  Again, I have problems of overlap, but this time I have problems the swapDepth script application. I can apply it only to the button invisible in the second frame as first image of the movieclip is empty and not intended to be clicked by the user. I tried the targeting;
  
  We (Release)
  {gotoAndPlay (3);}
  _root.CaseFile.casen1.swapDepths (20000);
  }
  
  but this doesn't seem to work.
  any thoughts?
  

  This may seem complicated, but variable worked for me before.
  the button on the frame 2, say I declare a variable when it was released, and then to frame my MOVIECLIP script 3:
  if(depthvar==1) {This.swapDepths (20000);
  }
  don't you think that this sounds feasible?

• In FCPx, I have a few images that was shot in 1080i, is there a way to deinterlace?

  In FCPx, I have a few images that was shot in 1080i, is there a way to deinterlace?

  EEdit in a progressive project.

• Don't color match images in FCPX

  Hi guys

  I am looking for color match two images in FCPX but when I select the clip, and then the color match, then click on the image, I would like to take advantage of the color palette (and hit apply) nothing happens.

  Is it not possible to color images of football game in FCPX?

  Thanks in advance

  When do you do that? You always hear images?

• FCPX fall images during playback w/new HW

  Due to the increase in the performance issues of the PCF (lost frames during playback, FCPX gel) on my iMAC 2010 - I bought a new system, including storage in late 2015.  But I still have issues with FCPX, deletion of images during playback I would appreciate some advice on.

  The old system was an iMac w/8 GB RAM Core i5 connected to a DroboPro with FW800 drive Bay.

  The new iMAC is the high-end retina 5 K 27 "(core i7, 4 GHz, AMD Radeon R9 M395 2048 MB, 3 TB Fusion lecteur connecté à un 4 de ThunderBay, quatre disques HDD avec double Thunderbolt 20Gb/s ports configurés avec RAID 5)."

  I still have some dropped frames during playback.  The first image I play works well for a few seconds if he runs.  But the next clip down boxes.  The clip takes sometimes a few seconds to display in the browser.  The clips that I play back have no effects applied to them.

  My capture files are stored on love at first sight.  The library of FCPX files are stored on the Mac hard drive.

  My current library has about 12 events.  Media and cache are stored in the library.  Backups are stored on love at first sight.  The library file size is 247 GB.

  Any assistance to solve my problems of performance is greatly appreciated I'm starting a large project of edition with 700 clips to sort.

  Try to put libraries in the table of love at first sight.

  It seems to me that you are running almost everything on your internal drive - you say that the library and the media are here. This isn't what you want.

  I combed just Fcp x, drag from the library of the search of the home and try again.

  Edit: Make sure that you open the library in the RAID, TTAB everything works and you can remove the old one the internal drive.

• FCPX is cut my short final project some images when I export.

  I have been editing on FCPX for a few years now and only stumbled upon this problem, this last month. I work with six and one half second publishes short and share on my iTunes movies at home. Every time I share the video or export it, even by other means, FCPX will cut my project a few frames. It becomes extremely irritating because the videos loop, or the last clip can be held until the end I tried several ways to solve this problem. Like the confection to change deliberately any longer so that FCPX it shortens the length I wanted initially it. But in every way that I do this, it just stripes as he did before and then adds the images of the remains. I also have this looked and tried different ways to export. It simply doesn't get it. I hope someone has an idea and can help me!

  I work with: Final Cut Pro version 10.2.2

  My computer is running: OS X Yosemite version 10.10.4

  Thank you!! BTW, I'm a 14 year girl, who does not many peers as edit, so I'm a little stuck...

  A screenshot of your Timeline would help.  Make sure that you have nothing selected in the pane calendar before exporting it.  Are you a master file when exporting?  What are the settings?