iMovie video editing problem.

Similar Questions

• Camileo S10 & video editing problem

  I want to change the video files on device S10. I can see video without problem using ie. WMP, VLC, players etc. but I can not change/convert using any program.
  TmpGenC
  Any Adobe program (audio only)
  Total converter
  other

  Any suggestion?

  Thank you
  Roberto

  Post edited by: uregiun

  Try AVS Video converter 6.3.

• Major newbie here - problems video editing on dvd that was burned to a dvd recorder

  First of all, let me say that I know ZERO about Premiere Pro or video editing. The first time I opened the program was last week and it took me about an hour to find a way to establish a chart / title of someone on a video given to me.

  It's the second time I open the program, and I don't know what to do.

  First: I'm on CC 2015 and have a Mac running OS X 10.10.4.

  Now my problem: I was given a DVD that someone burned for a one hour event registration. When I insert the dvd on my computer it DVD Player automatically opens and will play the event to one hour in full transparency.

  
  

  When I opened the DVD content, files is divided as follows:

  -VIDEO_TS. BUP

  -VIDEO_TS. IFO

  -VIDEO_TS. VOB

  -VTS_01_0.BUP

  -VTS_01_0.IFO

  -VTS_01_1.VOB

  -VTS_01_2.VOB

  -VTS_01_3.VOB

  -VTS_01_4.VOB

  -VTS_01_5.VOB

  I can import the five videos in the project and put one after the other in the right editing box where the video clips all are, but the transition from one clip to another is very glitchy.

  All I'm trying to do is finish the video for an hour or final clip about 45 seconds more earlier than that it actually ends because they have managed to save on another event, so the tail which appears at the end of this video. Any ideas on how I can extract the entire video, a time of DVD or make the transition from five clips as transparent as it is when I just read the DVD in a DVD player and don't try and change it?

  Thanks for any info!

  1st, CS5-thru-CC body/Encore tutorial list http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1448923 can help

  2nd, directly edit a VOB... or ripping a VOB to be changed with a score of Jim Simon http://forums.adobe.com/thread/1322647

• Help in obtaining loans for a simple video editing MBP

  I am trying to put things in place on a slightly older Macbook Pro.

  Here is my system configurations:

  OS X Version of El Capitan 10.11.5

  The MacBook Pro mid-2010

  Processor: 2.4 GHz Intel Core 2 Duo

  Memory 4 GB 1067 < Hz DDR3

  NVIDIA GeForce 320 M 256 MB graphics card

  I learned that my GPU's massively underpowered, i.e. 256 MB of VRAM is much too small.

  Through my research, I also determined that the GPU can be replaced, because I think it is welded in to the motherboard.

  In addition, my hard drive is probably not good either, quite right? Core 2 duo of is not as good as the new i7. So what are my options?

  I used to be able to run at least iMovie and slap some clips together for short videos, even add music. I lost iMovie during the upgrade to Yosemite and am trying to figure out if it's worth trying again (for $15). Before that I tried Davinci resolve 12.5 (which is more than my computer can manipulate wayyy), and then I even tried the GoPro simple studio software. Turns out that GoPro software is not that simple if you're not using images of the GoPro and my computer was struggling to convert, rendering, see even the files. And I don't think I'd be able to make the colors in GoPro calibration software, so I'm a little more than. I don't think I need all the features of Final Cut Pro, as I'm looking to throw together a few vacation pictures and some pictures again, also a timelapse here and there in the video, etc.

  I want to mention the GoPro software comes to losing me a lot of cred in this question, but this is where I am. I don't want to really go out and start building a computer for video editing (although it seems I could do relatively cheap ~ $ 600)

  Thoughts? Suggestions? What would you do if you could do it again?

  In addition, the camera that I mainly record the images and still images is a Panasonic G6

  Thanks for any help!

  What about iMovie.  .  .  have you tried looking in your AppStore account to see if it is still available as a free download?

  It is likely that you will not be able to install FCP X directly from the app store on your computer, probably, he does not meet the minimum specs for the latest version.

  However, you can download on a Mac more modern and copy it to all but you really need a more powerful Mac.

  You can download a free 30-day trial version to see if it will work in terms of: -.

  http://www.Apple.com/FinalCutPro/trial/

• What would be the best video editing and photo editing software to use for an iMac for advanced users?

  My first exposure to video and photo editing is on a PC with Adobe Premier and Adobe Photoshop.  I own a Macbook Air and have used iMovie and iPhoto.  It took me a few years to sort and organize thousands of photos archived and videos.  Now, with the changes in Final Cut Pro and the loss of the opening, I am, even once, sitting on the fence.  Compatibility between the software has always been a controversial issue and that you accumulate more and more files, it would be nice if Apple should keep in mind to develop software that can be upgraded seamlessly without losing or change any data.  For example, the photo is correct, once you become familiar with it. However, personally, I like the way events were created in iPhoto, but also how you can scrub through each event, just sweep a finger of each event.  Now in the Photos, you need to scroll right rows and rows of pictures, which seems to be a step backward when it comes down to the speed and convenience. I finally have the time to go back to my hobby of video editing and I was about to buy an iMac or a Macbook Pro.  What is the best choice for video and photo editing, or should I be looking back to Adobe?

  You can go to Phase One's Capture One.

• The new iMac 4 k is ready for video editing?

  I want to buy the new iMac 21.5 ' 4 K for video editing and Im not sure if its Integrated GPU or the rest of the hardware can handle the work. I usually work with 1080 p video, but I've read that its GPU is quite limited. Please I need help.

  You will have no problem using the iMac of the retina for editing 1080 p video. The 27-inch model includes a GPU dedicated with its own memory, however. You decide: http://www.apple.com/imac/specs/

• Y at - it a video editing software that I could use.

  I was asked to edit a video together.  I have Windows 7 and Office 2010.  Is there a simple video editing software in there?

  I have add more details to your previous thread if you want to further diagnose your problem with Movie Maker.

  As for your current question on AVS4YOU, my guess would be that the VPS is a project file that is unique to this program.  In other words, the person who would continue to edit your project should have the same editing program, the project file and all the source files in the same places on their PC.

  All video editing software are probably very similar in this regard.  For example, in Movie Maker, when you add items to your project, add transitions, etc. that they will appear in your project file.  In the case of Movie Maker, it's a .wlmp file.  A project file contains no actual video, photos or music, just the current state of your project.  It will contain a list of all your source files (the folder and the name of the relevant media file) and the details on the changes, transitions, effects, titles, legends added, etc.  But this isn't a file that can be understood by other video editing programs.

  To share the results of your changes, you must save the film resulting in a video file.  There are many formats of your choice.  For example, the latest version of Movie Maker can record in MP4 or WMV format.  That can be used in other programs.  AVS4YOU lists a number of formats too.

  However, which would result in a single video file with all your changes incorporated.  He would split points, individual videos/pictures, transitions, etc.  So basically, once you start editing in a video editor, you can't transfer this session to another video editor except as a completed film.

  There are exceptions, for example Adobe makes it so their other products include Photoshop files and Illustrator, or part of a project of creation may be related to an After Effects project.  Another example is that a Movie Maker project can be imported into Nero video 2014 for further processing. But it must be designed for and is not common during the passage to other video editing software.

• Video editing on network

  I have a network of video editing.

  Some of the NLE * computer OS is windows xp and some of them is windows7

  They all work great with local files (files stored in their hard drives). Problem occur when the files are imported from network drives in NLE software (for example, first adobe, avid liquid, Edius pro). NLE performance with windows 7 decrease seriously.

  Why does this happen? Perhaps because of certain policies of windows 7 on the network that we don't know.

  Could you help me?

  I am looking forward to hear from you.

  * NLE(non linier editing system)

  Hello

  The question you posted would be better suited in the TechNet Forums. I would recommend posting your query in the TechNet Forums.

  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/w7itpronetworking/threads

  Hope this information helps.

• Screen flashes different colors and freezes at the same time, there is a video card problem?

  When it gets really bad most of the screen will Blanch and freeze. This global problem cut in and out, but is common.
  Any help would be greatly appreciated.

  EDIT: I forgot to mention that it is a HP G62 laptop.

  Hello

  Yes, it could be a video card problem. Let me suggest that you run this Fix It routine: http://windows.microsoft.com/en-us/windows-vista/troubleshoot-monitor-and-video-card-problems#.

  Let me know if this helps you.

  Kind regards

  BearPup

• 2016 budget PC for video editing and animation

  I am building PC mainly for video editing and animation (suit Adobe, Maya, etc.).

  I7 6700 k, z170 pro gaming, 16 GB of RAM Gskill, evo Samsung 256 gb SSD, 2 TB WD Blue, Dell u2515h.

  I'm really confused, choose the budget videocard, CPU cooler and wardrobe.

  Budget: Around $ 1500 (Indian Rs 100000.) Intend to buy this month.

  Note: With good performance, I want dead silent.

  Thanks in advance.

  I have not read any problem of heating with the gtx 1060, only with the reference cooler on the rx 480. the series gtx 1000 added support for 4 k hdr and wcg, if you don't need those then the older gtx cards are always great to use. the 1060 gtx may be 40-50% faster than the gtx 960 and both are rated 120 watts. If your creative work who need a lot of power gpu, the gtx 1060 with a mid to low workload has a better chance to keep fans and be completely silent. I don't know if the model bill recommends is able to turn off the fan, but with a design unique its radiator fan will not be able to run passive as a biggest fan of double or triple design card. If you are more concerned with budget and plan on only using a few gpu accelerated fx and only HD projects, the gtx 750 ti 2 GB or 950 models 2 GB may be powerful enough for your needs. you would have to see what are the prices where you shop, here all the series 900 gtx cards cost too close to the gtx 1060. I don't know when will be released the gtx 1050, but it can help to lower prices on 900 gtx cards. the gtx 1050 can be around or just below the gtx 960 for the performance.

  the corsair website says the 100R will support 150mm height max cpu cooler, so it should be 90 to 120mm air coolers. you will need to check the dimensions of the cpu cooler you are looking for, to make sure it fits. It would also be good to search online if others use the casing and cooler together. cryorig h7 seems to be 145 mm in height, then he could adapt. I don't know the price for coolers here, so you will need to see those that fit your budget and look at reviews for cooling and noise levels to find the best. If you went with a larger case, it would be able to hold a 140mm cooler air and be quieter. coolers liquid AIO got better when they first came out and last usually a few years before the pump breaks down, or he flees. If an air cooler does not, he would need a new fan and would not risk damaging any material. If the case was too thin to allow a good air cooler, then the liquid would be appropriate, but I would choose replace the case first. the corsair 100r site says it will hold only a 120mm cooler liquid. It should be a 240mm or more large cooler liquid for a chance to be quieter than a good air cooler.

• Need recommendation for laptop - for video editing

  I'm trying to looking for a new laptop and need recommendations based on how I use the laptop.  I produce videos and mainly use the following programs: Adobe Photoshop, Adobe Premiere Pro, Adobe Encore DVD.  I also use other software such as AutoFX PGE7.0 of photo editing.

  I currently have a HP Pavilion which is about 5 years old.  This office has the following specifications:

  HP Pavilion PU131AV / a1050y, Intel Pentium 4 CPU 3.20 GHz, 2 GB RAM, Windows XP MCE, SP3 32-bit, Nvidia GeForce 6600

  I believe that with a new laptop, I was able to create my videos more efficiently.  If you have any input as to what I need in a laptop for my specific purpose, please let me know.

  Thank you very much

  Angela

  ``````````````````````````````````````````
  old computer: HP Pavilion PU131AV / a1050y, Intel Pentium 4 CPU 3.20 GHz, 2 GB RAM, Windows XP MCE, SP3 32-bit, Nvidia GeForce 6600
  new computer: HPE-180 t, Windows 7 Pro (64 bit), Nvidia GeForce GT 220, Intel Core i7 - 930 quad-core CPU @ 2.80 GHz, 8 GB of RAM

  For what you are doing you need all the horsepower you can gather. You have not specified a budget and with what you're trying to do, I don't think that it would be useful to think of anything less than a thousand dollars. You need at least 4 GB of memory and preferably 8. You need a 64 bit version of Windows 7. You need a quad core or i7 processor. Regarding the size of the screen, it's a matter of personal choice, but I don't see how you can get in with less than a 15-inch screen. In respect to the HP products you can consider the urge again, but the problem is the lack of an internal optical drive (CD/DVD type).

  HP is running a special offer on the dv6t Quad model with an i7 processor, $ 999 with a free upgrade to 4 GB of RAM and a concert full of video memory. While your P4 3.2 was the killer at a time where it was released, the dv6t Quad run rings around her, particularly in Photoshop. Make sure that you use a recent version of Photoshop with 64-bit and support multi-core. Also be sure to get the 7200 RPM hard drive, because it makes a big difference in video editing.

  Good luck and enjoy.

  Dv6t Quad Edition

• Existing video editing (specifically; images)

  Hi all

  I looked through a lot of discussion video editing (and made multiple internet searches), and I have not yet found an answer to what I'm trying to accomplish.  I hope someone here can help, and which would be greatly appreciated!

  I know how to make an animated GIF, and I also know how to make basic changes (adding text, transitions, music, etc.) of video files.  What I have a problem, namely is how to edit video in a way that allows me to make changes to the image in the video itself.  For example, if I want to go in a video and blur on a plate of licenses on a vehicle, what is the best way to do this?

  So far, the only way I understood is to make video images, edit each image, then convert the video frames.  It is a long and tedious process, and I feel like there is probably a better/more efficient way to do inside Photoshop.  Perhaps is not here and it's just a long and tedious process, but I hope that someone can find out about a better method.

  Could someone provide any help would be greatly appreciated!

  You have access to a NLE such as Premiere Pro and Premiere Elements? This would be the way to go for what you want to do.

  Photoshop peut work, but you must work around paradigm, unlike the more 'linear' method of editing in an NLE as first of Photoshop. (It's a bit like vector images; of course, Photoshop can work with a vector, but if there is a taste of Illustrator, it could not go back to Photoshop for vector stuff. "I'm sure that Adobe has designed this way on purpose.)

• Number of CPU cores required (Virtual vs. physical) for video editing 4 K Prime Minister?

  Hi all.

  About to start my own business / video editing. I'm doing a customized version of PC. I am considering a motherboard very processor dual Xeon with maybe 64 GB of RAM and a certified Quadro 4 GB or 8 GB GPU. The 4 k I intend to work on commercials under 15 long minutes, will take place with an average of 3 video tracks and 2 audio tracks.

  When it comes to running Adobe Premier Pro 5.5 or 6 (for 4K editing video and rendering), I read that it is recommended to have 12 hearts in each of the two processors. (The PDF I read was an official guide of 2015 from Intel: "Hardware Performance Guide: serious 4 K editing ')

  Now, I wonder if this figure of 12 cores per processor is related to PHYSICAL cores, or ALL hearts including VIRTUAL cores (.. .If it is referred to all the hearts, so I just need to buy two 6 core processors, giving a total of 24 cores can be used.) Big price difference between a 6 core CPU and a 12 core...

  The Xeon series which will be compatible with my MB is the 2600 CPU of the E5 v3 family. Stories of advice or that popular horror...!

  Paul.

  guide intel suggests probably 12 real hearts, possibly the v3 of E5-2680. It would be double Xeon 24/48 virtual hearts.

  software Adobe does not need the features on the quadro, using the version of game/Office nvidia gtx can help save money.

  If you need 10 bit out for the color correction, view maps of mfg as blackmagic, aja and others may be a better option.

  have you already bought the motherboard?

  Hardware requirements may vary for different types of media and project as multi-cam configurations. codecs like h264/5 are very difficult for the processor process and the gpu should be handled, but first does not currently support gpu accelerated encoding/decoding. This is what can lead to dual xeons as intel recommends. Dual cpu also have large overhead, reducing their combined processing power. Another reason why intel may recommend the 12 core dual processor. If you use the less demanding codecs such as prores or dnxhr, UC must be as powerful, and can even be possible to use a single processor. Some people transcode their sequences of difficult codecs like h264/5 prores or dnxhr as a whole work rather than buy a more powerful system to manage h264/5 when editing.

  Hackers Page - Video Codecs

  Intel PDF: "Hardware Performance Guide: serious 4 K editing."

  It is important to note that software engineers need to write specific code to take advantage of some features like multiple nuclei (multithreading) and virtual cores (hyper-threading). Consumer applications such as Adobe Premiere Pro and Adobe After Effects already take full advantage of these features.

  If you check that the tests carried out here: Tweakers Page - decide between one processor or dual CPU and read through the discussions here and other websites, you will find the results against this last sentence. software Adobe has long had problems fully multi-threads, the first is not as bad as some of the other adobe programs but can still have problems.

• For the Ultra HD / 4K / HEVC / H.265 video editing: GTX 960 or 980 Ti GTX?

  How is it important to have a hardware video-enabled-decoding card?

  I am deciding to buy GTX 960 or 980 it GTX for Ultra HD video editing.

  The GTX 960 uses GM206 which has only 2 GB of memory, but includes based video decoding hardware.

  The GTX 980 it uses GM200 which includes NO video decoding, but has 6 GB of memory and the together better statistics:

  www.Game-Debate.com/GPU/index.php?gid=2935 & gid2 = 2813 compare=GeForce-GTX-980-TI-6GB-vs-GE force-gtx-960-2 GB - sli

  For games, the GTX 980 it is 'extremely better' than the 960 GTX:

  http://gpu.userbenchmark.com/Compare/Nvidia-GTX-980-Ti-vs-Nvidia-GTX-960/3439vs3165

  Therefore, not for games, but for ultra HD video rendering, compatible more than make up for the worst overall performance hardware decoding?

  From a web forum: "only the GPU GM206 used in the GTX 960 supports full FIXED material HEVC decoding function. The GM200 used in the GTX 980 Ti and Titan X didn't, and the GM204 used in the GTX 970/980 also does not. »

  From a site of the magazine: 'we tested different video files on a GTX 960 H.265. Reading has been impeccable for each and every one of them, with only negligible CPU load, which means that they were handled entirely by the GPU. Reading files Ultra HD H.265 revealed no problem either. »

  Would the Ti 980 provide also "impeccable" reading of files of the Ultra HD H.265, even without hardware compatible decoding?

  Also, perhaps more fundamentally, the 960 even manages Ultra HD? From another site: "If you want to enjoy 4K game, then you will need to invest in a more expensive GPU Setup. For NVIDIA, the choice users clear right now is the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti. »

  Because I need to return and then read on the computer I see huge video projects, do I need, more memory/hearts (980 Ti) or hardware compatible decoding (960)?

  Thank you!

  Material HEVC decoding/encoding is not supported in Premiere Pro, so that "advantage" is questionable.

  For the rest, read Page Tweakers - what to use video card

• Video editing in real-time, is it possible?

  Hey all, first of all thank you for reading this post.

  I would like to know if it is possible to apply some effects (especially twixtor, some warp stabilizer, color correction) and see the result (perhaps at lower resolution, resolution 1/2, 1/4), without rendering, but the liquid (to check the image goes accordingly with audio, to see the speed change is control with twixtor, etc...)

  I have a laptop that is supposed to be powerful: i7-4800mq, 16 GB of RAM, GTX765M, and (perhaps it s the reason why I Don t see the expected result) a hard drive 7200 RPM (SATA 3 GB/s, with 64 GB SSD mSATA capture)

  I use the video recorded mainly a gopro 3 black and first pro cs6, sequelae. 1080, 60 frames per second.

  I want to change my computer because I have to do a lot of editing of short videos, a lot of twixtor and can´t waiting for renderize whenever I change something and the bar changes from green/yellow to red.

  I would like to know:

  -If it is normal, with my computer

  -If you intend to buy a computer, instead of asking which component you should buy part of (of course you can), what you think of these two:

  option 1:

  I7 - 4790 K 4.0 Ghz

  MSI GeForce GTX 980 Twin Frozr OC 4 GB GDDR5 V

  Motherboard: MSI Z97 Gaming ACK 9

  Hard drive:

  • Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3 TB SATA3 64 MB
  • Samsung 840 Evo series of SSD SATA3 500 GB (250 GB x 2 In raid 0)

  Kingston HyperX DDR3 2400 16GB PC3 - 19200 2x8GB CL11 Savage

  
  

  Price: approximately 2100 euros

  option 2:

  4790 K I7

  2 x GTX760 2 GB of GDDR5 memory

  Motherboard: GA-Z97X-SLI

  Hard drive:

  - 2 x HDD 1 TB 7200 RPM Seagate ST1000DM003
  

  -2 x SSD 120 GB Kingston V300
  

  16GB DDR3 1600 MHz (2x8GB) HyperX blue Fury series HX316C10FK2/16

  Price: about 1600 euro

  I know that I can use proxyes, but I think proxyes with less resolution gives problems with the stabilizer of warp and with less fps gives problems with twixtor.

  Don't you think that I'll be able to do the video editing in real-time with these computers? Thank you very much!

  GoPro black 3 is very slow on CS6. Twixtor is poorly threaded and does not support CUDA acceleration.

  Re option 1:

  • The 980 is way exaggerated, a 760 is more than enough.
  • 16 GB memory isn't enough, you want 32 GB.
  • Forget the EVO. It's far too slow with the Scriptures. Get a 850 Pro.
  • Get a few more HARD and SSD drive to improve disk i/o.

  Re option 2:

  • A single video card is supported under CS6. Go on the other.
  • 16 GB memory isn't enough, you want 32 GB.
  • a single 120 GB SSD for media cache and previews is very low. Better to use 256 GB Samsung 850 Pro.

  With GoPro material and even with the improvements suggested (more memory, better disk i/o) that you will still experience slowness, jerks, unstable behaviour, because of the quad core CPU.

  See Page Tweakers