Impact of Sandy?

Similar Questions

• UserAgents - impact technically in Fx browser (and using with fluid App)

  Hello:

  I don't know what the impact of a "user agent". I don't know if I chose the iPhone user agent on my Macbook, it means I can do things that Web site owners/developers have tried to limit to the iPhone for example read the full version of magazines for free. So I guess that a user agent tells the owner/designer of website 'our device' somehow we are somehow.

  But a user agent does nothing else on the technical plan for the browser?
  for example

  > no User-Agent controls whether a user script requiring xx can use xx (where xx = https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.8.3/jquery.min.js). I can run this successfully using GreaseMonkey userscript in Fx, but it fails to run approx. fluid userscripts a in-app, no plug-in is required.

  > no User-Agent controls how low I can zoom in. Current zoom level is limited to 50% with the user agent below. More useless.

  I wonder what I started to play with the app purchased, fluid.
  Fluid converts a SSB (Single Site Browser) - aka a lot of apps that are now pure web browser but really an app), in a quasi-app, so it can sit on your dock, use OSX notifications, use split window panels / trays etc...) Liquid is no where near as powerful as Fx, but there is no integration with the OSX notifications which at the moment I can't find an add-on that allows this via the webkit. Several modules now use notifications for OSX, so I know it must be possible (for example to download helper).

  The latest version of the fluid is 1.8.3 I bought recently. By default, I opened user agent and I see this:

  Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_10_3) AppleWebKit/0600.5.17 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/1955 FluidApp Safari/0600.5.17

  No idea what this user-agent is really telling me. I'm on OSX 10.10.3, yosemite I use the last FX (38 recently updated this week) and I don't use Safari.

  Thanks for your help.

  helpresearch said

  But a user agent does nothing else on the technical plan for the browser?
  for example
  
  > no User-Agent controls whether a user script requiring xx can use xx (where xx = https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/1.8.3/jquery.min.js). I can run this successfully using GreaseMonkey userscript in Fx, but it fails to run approx. fluid userscripts a in-app, no plug-in is required.

  I can't answer on the liquid, but Firefox itself can not be fooled by what you specify as your user agent. For example, it asks what OS it is running on the operating system, and he knows that it's Firefox.

  I think that most of the userscripts are designed with limited space in mind, such as Greasemonkey and Scriptish on Firefox (and maybe Waterfox and Pale Moon), Tampermonkey on Chrome and maybe one or two other maximally. Specific points in the user agent string probably does not matter.

  > no User-Agent controls how low I can zoom in. Current zoom level is limited to 50% with the user agent below. More useless.

  Again, I think not. But you might have success change this setting in Firefox:

  (1) in a new tab, type or paste Subject: config in the address bar and press enter/return. Click on the button promising to be careful.

  (2) in the search above the list box, type or paste the zoom and make a pause so that the list is filtered

  (3) double-click the preference zoom.minPercent and try to enter a lower minimum (for example, 25 for 25%).

  The latest version of the fluid is 1.8.3 I bought recently. By default, I opened user agent and I see this:
  
  Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10_10_3) AppleWebKit/0600.5.17 (KHTML, like Gecko) Version/1955 FluidApp Safari/0600.5.17
  
  

  
  No idea what this user-agent is really telling me. I'm on OSX 10.10.3, yosemite I use the last FX (38 recently updated this week) and I don't use Safari.

  My guess is that liquid wants website who do not recognize FluidApp treat it like Safari or any other browser Webkit (Safari and Chrome are popular browsers based on Webkit).

• E9L17EA #ABU: HP Envy 17-J110EA Ram upgrade Hyperx 16 GB & GTX980M Kit Impact: Question?

  Hi guys,.

  recently I bought this kit from RAM to upgrade my computer, going to work with my laptop?

  -16 GB DDR3L - 2133 MHZ NON - ECC SODIMM (SET OF 2) CL11 1.35V IMPACT SODIMM

  This is what im of ram to help during this time

  8 GB 1600 MHZ SDRAM SODIMM DDR3L

  ----

  Also wonder if a GTX980M Upgrade Kit will work with my laptop, would be very interested in buying a

  http://www.PCWorld.com/article/2882701/these-upgrade-kits-swap-out-your-laptops-old-graphics-with-a-...

  Driver Booster 2 beta - best tool update all your hardware drivers
  
  http://www.iobit.com/products.php

  Hello @Emeraldkingz,

  Thanks for the quick response!

  Your laptop can support up to 16 GB of RAM, using the configuration of 2 x 8 GB memory Modules.  As stated in my previous post, because the graphics is part of the system map, it is not extensible without replacing the entire system of Council.  I hope this helps.

  Kind regards!

• Omni 1020 120 pc: upgrade processor motherboard Sandy bridge

  Can I use Intel Core i3-3220 (3rd generation) Ivy Bridge 3.3 GHz LGA 1155 55W Intel HD Graphics 2500 for my Omni 1020 120 pc aio pc?

  Thank you for the information, @Nannigalaxy.

  The information I needed was the (in) at the end of the model.  Here are the processors that have been fully tested to work in your motherboard:

  TDP: up to 65W
  Socket type: LGA 1155
  Motherboard supports the following processor upgrades:
  Intel Pentium G4xx (Sandy Bridge) core
  Dual-core Intel Pentium G5xx (Sandy Bridge)
  Dual-core Intel Pentium G6xxT (Sandy Bridge)
  Dual-core Intel Pentium G6xx (Sandy Bridge)
  Dual-core Intel Pentium G8xx (Sandy Bridge)
  Intel Core i3-2xxx/T (Sandy Bridge) Dual Core
  Intel Core i3-2xxx (Sandy Bridge) Dual Core
  Intel Core i5-2xxx (Sandy Bridge) Quad Core
  Intel Core i7-2xxx (Sandy Bridge) Quad Core

  These are processors that we know won't work correctly.  If you use any processor not on the list, he has a good chance that it won't work.

  Please click on the button + Thumbs up if I helped you and click on accept as Solution If your problem is resolved.

• Satellite P750 - 10 c: HARD drive slows down - Sandy Bridge Cougar problem?

  Hello

  I have problem with my notebook Satellite P750 - 10 c with S/N: 4B478828K.
  When I enabled AHCI in the BIOS, computer slows diametrically, day after day was worste and worste, so I tried to change from AHCI to IDE and it helped a little, but is still not good.

  I tried to restore my system, but it did not help.
  I read that Intel has released a version tapped for Sandy Bridge chipset, I have (HM65) SATA 3Gbs problem (I just checked in HD Tune and HARD drive is connected to the port of 3Gbs), so I think I got bugged version.

  My laptop is not guaranteed, but Intel said they changed valid version, so where do I return my phone to fix.

  Kind regards
  Tomek

  > I read that Intel launched buggy version of the chipset for Sandy Bridge.
  The problem was a Cougar Point of Sandy Bridge chipset and not the main processor Sandy Bridge.

  In addition Intel said that this issue affected only the SATA 2 to 5 and not ports 0 and 1.
  Most laptops use only two devices SATA (HDD/SSD and ODD) using the affected ports 0 and 1.
  That is why I think that your problem could be linked to the issue of Cougar Point the Sandy Bridge chipset.

  By the way: not all Intel Sandy Bridge chipsets have been affected.

  Regarding your question:
  Usually if AHCI is enabled, the HARD drive must use the performance of SATA. If compatibility mode, the HARD drive would go at the speed of the IDE.
  I think your problem is perhaps related to the problem drive HARD and not Intel problem.

• G6-1262sa Pavilion: Pavilion g6-1262sa CPU upgrade v2, Sandy Bridge = > Ivy Bridge?

  Hi, thanks to the Pavilion g6-1262sa maintenance and manual cleaning and this great forum, I recently discovered that replace my i3-2330 m is possible with all sandy bridge i7 2620m processors.

  These questions may sound silly, but I continued my research and I have more ideas to confront reality as a couple.

  I realize that the compatibility is not only matter of editing the same socket, but also of the bios installed on certain motherboard, however:

  1. do you think it would be possible to Exchange Sandy Bridge (2nd generation) i3 - 2330 m for some Ivy Bridge (3rd generation) i5-3210 m?

  2 is the 32nm to 22nm manufacturing technology enough difference on its own (even if the rest of the architecture is the same) to prevent that to work?

  3 is the bios from my card mother g6 identyfying somehow installed processor? (if this isn't on 'the list' it simply won't work? "or what technical compatibility issue?

  According to some statements which I found it on some forums and sites (and a few facts documented free):

  Socket: the two processors are compatible with BGA1023 decision-making. (at least that's what I found, if someone could confirm I would be grateful)

  Difference of architecture: "The 3rd generation is called 'Ivy Bridge' and is essentially a copy of Sandy Bridge made on a smaller scale, or die." However, Intel also focused on beefing up of the onboard graphics in this generation. »

  TDP: both are 35 W

  Carrots: both are 2 physical (Virtual 4 - thanks to hyperthreading I guess?)

  Energy consumption: "Ivy Bridge CPUS also use less energy", "Ivy Bridge consumes less energy; around 10w, I think. »

  Temperature: i5-3210 m going 5 * C more - 2330 m - i3 shouldn't make much difference

  Looking forward to some responses, RacA

  It is not a technical incompatibility (socket) because as you probably know Ivy Bridge and Sandy Bridge are backward compatible on most motherboards desktop. However, HP has only implemented gen 2d, processor Intel Core compatibility of the HM65 Express chipset that you a. motherboards supporting 3rd gen processors use the HM77 chipset. There is no another motherboard that will fit in your frame.

  Your analysis above, which was pretty good, left out the chipset, which you must always remember when assessing the possibilities of upgrade:

  http://www.CPU-upgrade.com/MB-Intel_%28chipsets%29/HM65_Express.html

  The HM65 supports a couple 3rd gen processors, but none of them are on the list of HP for your model. You can try one of those shown in the link I gave, but I think that there is a small chance that they will work.

  If it's 'the Answer' please click on 'Accept as Solution' to help others find it.

• Satellite A660 - 1 H 5 and crack chips Sandy

  Hello

  I'm new to this forum. I recently bought a 1 H 5 A660. The thing within a week of purchase that I start to get this blue screen when I turn on the computer. It is about 50% of the time. Then I went to the shop where I buy the machine and discovered that there is a recall of the product because of the fault of sandy bridge.

  «Toshiba also recalled its models of series A660 Satellite L655, A665 and M645, the Satellite E305 S1990, select computers laptop Toshiba Portege R835, some systems of the Qosmio X 505 and the Qosmio X 500 series - model Q930.»

  The thing is I can't find my product even on the toshiba site. I can find 1 h 7, 1:6, but not 1 h 5. I want to know is there anyone with the same situation as me. And I want to know is the same laptop with the same specification will be released in April when intel ships fixed chips?

  And the thing I don't understand is, according to the news:

  "The Cougar Point flaw affects only SATA Intel controlled 3 Gbps ports - 6 GB/s ports are fully operational." PC manufacturers who only make use of the 6 Gb/s ports are therefore encouraged to continue anyway.

  "* If you are a manufacturer of laptop, you will find laptops which is enough for a hard drive and DVD drive, two ports SATA [6 Gb/s]", said a spokesperson for Intel Pro PC *. "In these cases, it is perfectly OK to use the B2 walk."

  Also, surely, it should not cause a problem on my laptop? Even if it does, not after a week of purchase?

  I have that really the new laptop and I really want to get a strong response from the official toshiba representative exactly what the problem with my computer before you return it for a refund.

  BTW, my laptop can be found on amazon:

  http://www.Amazon.co.UK/Toshiba-Satellite-I7-2630QM-processor-Bluetooth/DP/B004K6MEPY

  Spec:

  Brand: Toshiba
  Size of RAM: 6 GB
  Processor brand: Intel
  CPU speed: 2 GHz
  Processor type: Intel Core i7-2630QM
  Hard drive size: 640 GB
  Hard drive speed: 5400 RPM
  Computer memory Type: DDR3 SDRAM
  Operating system: Windows 7 Edition Home Premium
  Description of graphics card: NVIDIA® GeForce® GT 540 M
  Size of graphics card Ram: 2 GB
  Chart of RAM type: DDR3 SDRAM
  Screen size: 15.6 inches
  Display technology: LCD
  Response time: 16 milliseconds
  Type of light Source: LED
  Speakers Maximum output power: 2 watts

  Post edited by: ethan.ky

  Post edited by: ethan.ky

  Post edited by: ethan.ky

  Post edited by: ethan.ky

  Post edited by: ethan.ky

  Hello

  My cousin bought one of these new A660 with the Sandy Bridge chipset and it works perfectly fine.
  Apparently it takes months or even years for the SATA ports to start to fail, he decided to keep this A660 for now, until new motherboards are available.

  We discovered that only the external SATA (eSATA) port is assigned.
  The HARD drive is not on a port.
  The optical drive is on a port, but optical drives do not require a high bandwidth so it is not affected.

  So basically, you have the option to return the laptop rather than buy or keep it for the time, and then send it to an ASP when new mothers are available.

• Re: Satellite L650 / 07C - HDD (Hard Drive Impact Sensor) shock protection system

  I just bought a Satellite L650 / 07C. When I bought it from the dealer, I was under the impression that this model came with the function disk hard drive shock protection system (hard drive Impact sensor).
  I ran the Toshiba PC Health Monitor application, but it seems not to have this function - it gives me the power settings, Temp and fan are monitored, as well as a status of hard disk drive, but nothing on the disk hard drive shock anti-siphoning (hard drive Impact sensor).

  Under my file utilities Toshiba HDD SSD Alert application that shows the same icon as the one I saw in the reseller on their Toshiba Satellite when they did there evidence the shock protection system. I ran this application, but it gives me just a status message that the drive works properly.

  Could someone please confirm with certainty whether the model I have this feature.

  Thank you very much.

  Everything goes well with your laptop. I made a screenshot and uploaded to show you:

  http://img135.imageshack.us/img135/788/shocki.jpg

  When you shake your portable hard drive ssd aler appears, however, you can disable it appearing.

• Sandy Bridge for Ivy Bridge CPU upgrade in the W520

  Sandy Bridge and Ivy Bridge using the same socket. All tech sites say that we can do.

  What are the implications? With HD-4000 graphics I would now be able to drive 4 monitors? What other benefits are there? Energy consumption is slightly reduced, the speed is slightly increased.

  What are the limits of the chipset and BIOS implications?

  It's probably not about the money, but will it work?

  
  

• Software for the NI 9233 Impact hammer trigger

  I'm collecting data of a built-in beam. I installed the test of impact labview module to acquire data with fmax 1200Hz, sampling frequency - 3000 Hz, to acquire data for about 0.9 seconds with a = 1.2 Hz frequency resolution.
  He shows me the impact when I run the software, but does not collect or store data. Finally, an error saying: trigger software has expired. Also, I put the number of samples to 2500, but I get a message that the samples must be greater than 0 which I can't understand.
  How am I suppose to collect data for impact at the time and he averaged? I tried N samples and run once options.

  If you could help me out with this it would be great. Thank you very much.

  Hi StuMtu,

  The two properties to set to clear the errors will be to increase the time-out in the step of trigger Setup tab. You must also make sure that you are going to be exciting the hammer than the level set out within this time limit, otherwise you will get the timeout error.

  The other error you receive should just happen when you try to set the number of samples to averageto zero. If you set a higher number, the error should disappear. If it still does not work, you can try putting a new stage with the appropriate settings to see if the error persists.

  Kind regards

  Kent

  Technical sales engineer

• Test question of impact frequency

  Hi all:

  I'm trying to get the natural frequencies of some frames my company designs and I was wondering if there was a simple way to get this to the impact of the sample test of vi and display? Currently, I work with SVXMPL_Impact Test.vi and SVXMPL_Advanced Impact Test.vi and I am running Labview 2010 with the sound and vib add on.

  Andy

  Hi andy,.

  It seems that these example programs to find the frequency of the pulse signal. You can use the same .vi SVFA FFT (Mag Phase) spectrum used in the research of the frequency to find the frequency of the response signal. Once you have this signal, you can use the spectrum SVFA cutting-edge research to read the natural frequency from the frequency data.

  

• Acceleration signal initial height under impact load - LabVIEW

  Hi all

  A hemispheric 10.6 kg strike ball weight a sample of concrete went the distance of 200 mm.

  The acceleration recorded using labview is illustrated below. Anyone know why I get this initial peak (ms 3 to 5.7) initially because acceleration must go down at impact?

  

  Thank you all.

  The test of the room shows an acceleration to rest of about 0 of + 20 when you deposit the coin.  I guess that the 1 g of gravity has been canceled, and that when the beam begins to descend, it is saved as an acceleration positive, right?  [Enter the right signs to something like this can be a real challenge!].

  I'm happy, I think that "the data is correct" was right.

  Bob Schor

• Impact and possibility to deny user access to the registry key

  What is the possibility (how can I do it) and the impact of the blocking of the key following registry or certain binary values within active directory on all users in the domain

  HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion\Internet Settings

  Hi Omar 123.

  Your question of Windows 7 is more complex than what is generally answered in the Microsoft Answers forums. It is better suited for the IT Pro TechNet public. Please post your question in the TechNet Windows 7 networking forum.

  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/w7itpronetworking/threads

  I hope this helps.

• Pavilion P7 - 1597c: can a failed HD replaced by another brand - without impacting the Secure Boot UEFI?

  My PC is a Pavilion P7 - c 1597 (Windows8) preinstalled.

  I want to replace a failing drive and do a reinstall complete a commercial version of professional Window8.

  I am concerned about the impact that could have on the UEFI firmware / signatures Secure Boot on the PC.

  Do I need a HD HD (or PC) manufacturer signed device driver?

  Or the complete reinstallation of the W8 Pro will receive the drivers that I need to keep Secure Boot working properly?

  Any ideas or advice you can offer are sincerely appreciated...

  Rwgarre, welcome to the forum.

  The hard drive do not have a negative effect on the Secure Boot.  It seems that you should have all the drivers you need.

  Please click on the Thumbs up button '+' if I helped you and click on "Accept as Solution" If your problem is resolved.

• Impacts of the transition from XP to Windows 7

  Hi all

  I have a Windows XP system currently and you want to upgrade to Windows 7.  What are the impacts to do?  Only my OS will be upgraded and everything else remains the same (current software, the data on my hard drive, etc.) or he not formate my computer and re - installed OS?

  Please note that I am looking to download the OS on the web site of Microsoft and not by the CD in a store...

  Thank you in advance for your help!

  Hello

  You cannot upgrade Windows XP to Windows 7. You must perform a custom installation.

  For more information and help, see the article.

  Upgrade Windows XP to Windows 7

  Note: You must take the backup of the data before performing any installation of windows.