Inclusion of additional installation

Similar Questions

• NOR-RIO as not installed additional Installer 4.0

  I have converted my LabView 8.6.1 project 2011 SP1. The output of the project is a Setup program that includes the additional installers as 4.0 OR RIO. This avoids to install these drivers manually on the test PC. Test PC has a card of the R series FPGA. Only when I install the Setup program generated on the PC NOR-RIO of test driver is not installed. Everything seems to work fine (after installing this driver manually). Anyone have an idea what may be wrong?

  Hi Thierry,.

  Thanks for your reply. I managed to fix it myself. I added the extra 'NI R Series 4.0' installation program probably is not part of NOR-RIO 4.0 more when add you it as an additional installer (but it is part of RIO OR when you install from a DVD). I looked before, but I forgot the first time (prior to the announcement of my problem). .

  Kind regards

  Biker

• laptop 15-ac123-tx: bluetooth said required additional installation devices

  My says bluetooth devices ' device BTHENUM\Dev_4886E8DAA566\7 & 1aa362de & 1 BluetoothDevice_4886E8DAA566 requires more installation.»

  I am unable to share files, play sounds of bluetooth devices. And there are a few other features such as MS-ABTP and MS - TCC

  Hey @akhilsurabhi,

  Here is a link that shows you how to pair devices.

  I hope this helps.

  Thank you.

• NI-VISA duration 4.3 additional installation problem

  Hello

  I use Project Explorer and I am trying to sign up NI-VISA duration 4.3, but during construction, I get a message that says:

  Locate the distribution of 'enable '. LabVIEW must copy a component installed or updated by the distribution to continue the construction of the installer.

  I don't know what is the distribution of 'Turn on' or where to find it! Help, please.

  See attachments.

  Thanks for the suggestion, but I solved the problem in a different way.  I have downloaded the driver NI-VISA Run-time http://joule.ni.com/nidu/cds/view/p/id/989/lang/en 4.3 then it extracts into a folder.  I stressed Project Explorer in this folder, and it was properly.
  I was then able to build the project successfully.

  SIDD

• Additional installation of hard drives... help!

  My HP Pavilion D4100E has an internal hard drive bay that can accommodate two additional internal drives, but I can only find a housing of additional interface on the motherboard. Am I missing something? Are there other places in the interface that I'm missing that are far from the area where my first hard disk is connected? In addition, in outline form reading here, it says that there two open "external bays. Is it just a way of saying, he has two USB slots including two external drive can be plugged on, or are there real external bays for hard drives?

  Any idea that someone could provide on any of these questions would be greatly appreciated!

  According to the specifications of your system, it is possible that the system came with two motherboards. Here are the specifications of the card mother ASUS A8AE - LE Amberine-GL6E and here are the specifications of the card mother MSI MS-7093 Ahi / Ahi2. Refer to these Web pages to determine what motherboard your system. The Amberine has two connectors x IDE for up to four IDE devices and two x serial ATA ports for up to two SATA devices. The Ahi/Ahi2 has two connectors x IDE for up to four IDE devices and 4 x serial ATA ports for up to four SATA devices.

  I hope this helps.

  Frank

• After installing Photoshop, I get a message that the installation has failed and in addition: Installation is complete although some optional components failed to install correctly. (6).

  file:///C:/users/Mornay/APPDATA/local/Temp/%7B6FE86E30-8233-48AC-AADD-F32BBEEC1619%7d/Summ ary.htm

  I managed to install updated correctly installed in part of ba. Thank you.

• All Windows updates and all the patches and individual installation on my program

  Is someone can you please tell me why every windows update fills up my programs?
  I have about 30-40 on my all programs.
  Can I remove all?
  I don't have this problem on my other pc just this laptop.
  Thank you in advance.

  Hello

  It seems that no one is able to answer this question here. If you have 2 possibilities:

  -disable the update of windows to avoid an additional installation of new updates and etc...
  -go to "Add/Remove Applications" and uncheck the 'Show updates' (or something similar). This box should be at the bottom of this window

  Otherwise, you should check out other, more associated microsoft forums, or just google a bit around to find an answer.

  Welcome them

• HP Pavilion 14-ab100: peripheral PCI requires the installation

  WiFi connection be lost automatically. You have to restart several times. Yet once the problem repeats. I tried rollbacking and update the drivers. The driver is not installed in the last attempt as well. Still problem persists.

  It shows 'peripheral PCI VEN_8086 & DEV_08B3 & SUBSYS_00708086 & REV_83\34E6ADFFFF52349C00 requires an additional installation' under ' Intel Dual Band Wireless - AC 3160 "Information."

  I traveled all the previous posts and forums, tried the BIOS update as well. Nothing has worked.

  Please help me solve the problem.

  Hello:

  Have you tried the latest driver W10 directly from Intel?

  Otherwise, it's one you need... 2nd one down on the left for 64 bit.

  https://Downloadcenter.Intel.com/download/26171/Intel-PROSet-Wireless-software-and-drivers-for-Windows-10?product=75442

  If you still have the problem after installing the driver, the only other suggestion I can offer would be to uninstall the Intel 3160 in Device Manager, click the driver uninstall, restart the PC and reinstall the driver above.

• Cannot create an installer containing IMAQdx in 2014 of LabVIEW

  I have a strange question in the generation of installers with a function IMAQdx in LV Application Builder 2014.

  When I was building an installer for an executable file using IMAQdx in 2013 LV, Application Builder automatically selected additional installers needed and IMAQdx drivers (Vision Acquisition) were one of them. Now I'm trying to build the project even in 2014, but in the additional installers, I see only NOR-IMAQdx DURATION 14.0. When I build the installer in 2014 LV, the size of the file is about 300MB opposed to 900MB of the installer which has been built in 2013 of LV.

  When I run the installation program from 2014 on a 'clean' Windows, install and run any application that uses IMAQdx, I do not see the cameras connected. This problem is fixed after manual installation Vision Acquisition software of DVD drivers for the device OR. After that, I can see all the cameras in the application and in MAX.

  I tried to manually add additional installers in 2014 LV, but nothing helped. It seems to me that there is no way drivers IMAQdx bundle in LV Application Builder.

  I found a post related to this and I wonder if someone can reproduce this behavior before dropping off a CAR. I have attached a simple project with a simple VI and installers of the sample in for testing. The VI allows you to select a camera (e.g. a webcam) and video image.

  Hi martin.zmrhal,

  What you see with only the Vision Acquisition Software runtimes (VAS) available in the list of installers extra is expected with the latest behavior.

  Before Vision Acquisition Software (VAS) August 2014, programs additional installation to after-sales Service, namely OR-IMAQ, e/s NOR-IMAQ and NOR-IMAQdx not only includes the runtime components but also for LabVIEW application development support. GO August 2014 and later, now only allow us the deployment of runtime components. This gives the advantage of a substantially reduced Installer size, but you can include more support development (ADE) LabVIEW applications is in the installation program.

  This change aligns Vision with LabVIEW behavior and most of the other products OR you cannot deploy generally support the complete development of a product, but rather only the runtime components. If you need to install GO with ADE on your deployment machine, you will need to distribute the complete Installer GOING on this machine in addition to LabVIEW (to make use of the SAV ADE support). To do this automatically, you will need to write a batch file to run the installer for LabVIEW, then IMAQdx.

  With respect to the second issue of not being able to see the camera, I think that what you are experiencing is that the drop of the control Session is dimmed and you cannot click on it to see a list of the cameras on the system. It is also the expected behavior for the runtimes are going TO. This does not mean that the driver is not well that discovery of cameras, and you can test this by typing the name of the camera in the Session control (for example "cam0" for the first discovery of camera on the system).

  What we are looking for with this behavior, is for vision applications deployed to abstract the end-users camera selection process. Ideally, your code must list programmatically cameras with IMAQdx list Cameras.VI and then determine what device (based on the type of bus, serial number, model number, etc.) to the target. We are working on an application note paper that clearly explain with some examples, but the idea is similar to this example of community for NI-DAQmx devices: https://decibel.ni.com/content/docs/DOC-10014.

  I'm sorry for the current lack of documentation on these features, but without a doubt, we are working to provide examples useful and other items in the knowledge base at this address. I'll post a link to the content as soon as it is available.

  In addition, Vision Acquisition Software August 2014 f1 went live yesterday: http://www.ni.com/download/ni-vision-acquisition-software-august-2014-f1/4974/en/. The patch is also available through the Update Service, and it is strongly recommended that you upgrade if you still use drivers of August 2014.

  Kind regards

  Joseph

• Can you build a new version of an exe without having to rebuild its installer later?

  I'm currently testing an exe LabVIEW-built on a PC without installed LabVIEW. Whenever I go back to the development PC to fix a bug / change something, and then rebuild the executable file, it seems that I must also rebuild its installer which takes considerable time.

  Is it possible to rebuild an executable without having to rebuild its installer? Or a way to tell the installation program that he didn't need to be completely rebuilt, but rather just has to look at the new executable?

  After writing this, I realized it probably isn't a way to do it, but it's worth a shot.

  Christian.

  If you remove all the additional installation programs of your build spec, you should end up with a fairly compact to build installer.

  I usually a specification of construction to complete installation, then a spec to build for the patch install.  When I make just a small change and know that the application will be distributed only on a computer that already has the EXE, I just rebuild the hotfix installation program.

  For major releases, I will rebuild the full installer.

• How can I get the installer for my application check the operating system type and then install the correct driver type?

  I have a request that I wrote and have been use and distribute for awhile. The installer I created for this application is an additional installer to install a driver for the USB connection. The USB connection is actually a virtual COM Port. The problem is that the people who drafted modified driver setup the installation program itself. They used to have an installer that would check for 32-bit or 64-bit OS and then install the appropriate driver.

  Now, they have two distinct installation programs: one for the other for 32-bit and 64-bit. They let the user know their OS and install the appropriate driver. I'd rather not have to rely on my users to do. From what I've seen the creater Installer provides that an executable to be run after the application installs.

  Is it possible to have the installer of the application, check the type of OS and then run the correct executable file after installing my application? I think that I could write an Installer 'wrapper' that checks the type of operating system then executes the correct Installer. But I expect a better solution.

  Thank you
  Joe

  So, I make it work!

  The trick is to find a way to determine what type of OS you are using. The method I used was, indeed, read the environment variable. A buddy of mine sent me this link:

  http://StackOverflow.com/questions/2401756/how-to-find-if-the-machine-is-32bit-or-64bit One of the phrases he bibliography the Processor_Architecture environment variable.

  It seemed like a reasonable idea. So I started to research how read LV it environment variables turns out, you do it by reading a registry key. There is an example of LV on how to read a registry key. But I did not know where they are in the registry. So, I searched the Processor_Architecture registry. I found it in HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\ControlSet001\Control\Session Manager\Environment.

  According to the article in the link, this value will already be x 86 for a 32 bit OS, or something with 64 inside. I just check the response for x 86 string. If it is, I just run the x 86 version of the driver Installer. Otherwise, I run the x 64 version.

  It turned out to be as simple as that.

  I hope this helps someone.

  Joe

• build LV2010 Installer error

  Hello

  I use LV2010 32 bit, vision tools, database tools, Win7 64-bit.

  I get the following error when I Isaiah to compile a Setup program.  The executable file is based without any problem only the installation program:

  CodeSignAPI.lvlib:Get signature String.vi error
  Error: The time stamp authority URL specified does not point to a valid authority timestamp server or an unknown error has occurred.

  «"" "String of full appeal:»»"»
  CodeSignAPI.lvlib:Get signature String.vi error
  CodeSignAPI.lvlibign with Certificate.vi
  IB_MSI.lvclassign_Setup.vi
  IB_MSI.lvclass:build.VI
  CDK_Engine_Main.VI
  CDK_Build_Invoke.VI
  CDK_Build_Invoke.VI.ProxyCaller

  Loading information of product deployment
   
  **************
  Requested abort.
  **************
  Error details:
  **************
   
  Loading information of product deployment
  Adding files to install
  Validation of...
  Copying files...
  Analysis of the files...
  Updating files...
  Build completed successfully.
  Makes adding files
  Preparing to build the deployment
  Copy of the products of distributions
  Deployment of building
  Copy of the configuration files
  Merged configuration database information
  Definition of product information
  Information for the developer settings part
  Final construction of departure
  Validation of...
  Copying files...
  Analysis of the files...
  Updating files...
  Creating a merged database...
  Creating the Installer files...
  Build completed successfully.
  Copy of the additional installation files
  Compression of the files in the installer
  Deployment of the completed building

  Although the error message clearly indicate that there is something wrong with the section "Windows Security" of specifications you Installer, try to delete the settings in this section and see if it is created correctly, then if she doesn't know where to dig.

  Good luck

• Upgrade to LabVIEW caused 2012 issue additional installers

  Hello again all you lovers forum useful!

  I've been using LabVIEW 2010 (SP1) for awhile on my Windows XP computer, but I recently bought and installed LabVIEW 2012 for a future project.  In the meantime, my previous projects should always use LabVIEW 2010 until I use the tracking system of formal changes to my company to upgrade.  However, when I opened recently one of my old projects in 2010 to update and rebuild the installer, I saw in the tab other installers a bunch of empty lines at the end of the list (see screenshot).  This is not directly the hurt, but I think it's a symptom of the root problem.

  Most directly concerned, the NI VISA Run-Time 5.0.3 which had been checked before was now gone and the NI-VISA Run-Time 5.2 driver which had replaced it has NOT been verified.  That seems like an upgrade oops on part of National Instruments for me.  I decided that it was just a thing, and that the installer of 2012 had replaced my 5.0.3 version with version 5.2 (removal of the old version), so I checked the version 5.2 to build my Installer, and after having demanded that my DVD to copy the software on my computer, which seemed to work ok.

  Now the immediate problem: when I distributed the project file to a colleague that has LabVIEW 2010, she was not able to build my software installation, because he asked her to drive "FADEC_Emulator".  "FADEC_Emulator" is the name of my software.  Expansion of the error dialog box showed that he wanted the drive for access to NI VISA Run-Time 5.0.3.  Open the properties of the installer in the project file in LabVIEW showed NEITHER VISA Run-Time checked 5.0.3.  However, the project of opening with Wordpad file showed that NEITHER VISA Run-Time 5.2 has been listed as an extra Installer (and NOT 5.0.3  Maybe its system because I wanted NEITHER VISA Run-Time 5.2 and replaced it automatically with the latest version, he had, 5.0.3?  Confusing!  And if he did it, why he had that version already practicing?  And versions of switching as it seems it would be a bad idea to do it silently, in case I was counting on a specific feature of the new version.

  I'm afraid that since installing LabVIEW 2012 my system got in an unstable state, and now I possibly corrupted my LV project project file.  I need to have in 2010 and 2012 on my computer at the moment.

  Does anyone have an idea of what's going on with my system, or how to fix it?

  Thank you very much in advance for your suggestions and time!

  -Joe

  Hey Joe,

  I tried to reproduce your problems and met with mixed results. Please check with what I have provided below that we test in the same conditions

  jmorris wrote:

  Most directly concerned, the NI VISA Run-Time 5.0.3 which had been checked before was now gone and the NI-VISA Run-Time 5.2 driver which had replaced it has NOT been verified.  That seems like an upgrade oops on part of National Instruments for me.  I decided that it was just a thing, and that the installer of 2012 had replaced my 5.0.3 version with version 5.2 (removal of the old version), so I checked the version 5.2 to build my Installer, and after having demanded that my DVD to copy the software on my computer, which seemed to work ok.

  In this scenario, I built a test project with VISA RT 5.0.3 and LabVIEW 2010 configuration. I then installed LabVIEW 2012 and VISA 5.2.0 on top of the above configuration. When I opened the project from 2010 to 2012, VISA Run-Time 5.2 has been verified (as expected, dissimilar to your configuration). As I mentioned earlier, this may have been because VISA 5.2.0 did not install correctly.

  jmorris wrote:

  Now the immediate problem: when I distributed the project file to a colleague that has LabVIEW 2010, she was not able to build my software installation, because he asked her to drive "FADEC_Emulator".  "FADEC_Emulator" is the name of my software.  Expansion of the error dialog box showed that he wanted the drive for access to NI VISA Run-Time 5.0.3.  Open the properties of the installer in the project file in LabVIEW showed NEITHER VISA Run-Time checked 5.0.3.  However, the project of opening with Wordpad file showed that NEITHER VISA Run-Time 5.2 has been listed as an extra Installer (and NOT 5.0.3  Maybe its system because I wanted NEITHER VISA Run-Time 5.2 and replaced it automatically with the latest version, he had, 5.0.3?  Confusing!  And if he did it, why he had that version already practicing?  And versions of switching as it seems it would be a bad idea to do it silently, in case I was counting on a specific feature of the new version.

  In this case, I built the installation program on LabVIEW 2012 with VISA RT 5.2.0 then saved for LabVIEW 2010 compatibility. When I open the installer in a LabVIEW with VISA 5.0.3 2010 environment, VISA 5.0.3 has been verified (as planned since LabVIEW by default to the latest version of VISA on the PC, no matter what the original installer referenced). I did, however, see three additional empty lines in the additional installers (see below) tab. I also tried to build the Setup program that you have indicated, but did not get all the guests for the discs and was able to successfully build.

  One thing to keep in mind is that default LabVIEW uses the version of the driver that is installed on the PC version, whether it is newer or older than the installer references. If you feel that this has a negative impact on your success as a developer, please do not hesitate to post a feature request (for example, a guest at changes of the version of the driver) in our forum for the exchange of idea (http://forums.ni.com/t5/LabVIEW-Idea-Exchange/idb-p/labviewideas ).

  Finally, regarding empty lines in the additional installation specifications, this problem seems to be fixed in LabVIEW 2012 and manifests itself only in 2010. During my trial class, this does not affect installers of construction and is a minor inconvenience that has been fixed in later versions.

  Please let me know if you have other questions/comments on these issues.

  Concerning

  Doug W

• Additional set UP in AR after upgrade R12...

  Hello Experts,

  As he is once again, but this time is to do AR., we must do any additional installation after R12 upgrade for AR?

  We are reclassification of 11.5.10.2 to R12.1.3.

  We know there are several new feature available in R12 for AR, but from the perspective of upgrade, no matter what additional facility we might need to do.

  Thanks for the support.

  Atul
  

  In my view, the same docs are applicable here, and I don't think that there any docs more that we offer here. However, you are looking for MOS (R12 AND AR AND upgrade) and go through the docs.

  As Asif said, if you have specific questions please feel free to post here or sign a SR.

  Thank you

  Hussein

• Installation of Oracle 10 g 2 on cloud

  Hi exports.
  
  Can someone give me some knowledge how to install Oracle 10 g 2 on Cloud Server (Windows Server 2008 R2 64-bit). as I am very new to install Oracle in Cloud server. I try to install it but failed to do next after selecting the Advanced Setup.
  
  
  
  Thanks in advance...

  YAA I am installing the software only. but after selecting forward Installation and clicking next without windows additional installation seems to go forward. I will also meet all the pre-reqs.

  Its a test server, if all goes well, then we will install 11 GR 2 it. Now its only for test purpose. I received instruction from my manager to install 10 g 2 on this server.