index partition unusable

Hello

If I score partitioned unusable index.
as to change the < index_name > index unusable.
all parttions of the index would become unusable?

Thank you
Pramod

Hi, Yes, specify
UNUSABLE to mark the index or indexes and partitions or index subpartition (s) UNUSABLE.

Tags: Database

Similar Questions

  • ORA-01502: index 'pk_tab1' or partition of this index is unusable;

    After ruining congratulate him:

    ALTER index rebuild tablespace to developers pk_tab1. »

    I check the State of objects and getting no results

    Select * From User_Objects o
    Where o.status! = 'VALID';

    But my process to get the error

    ORA-01502: index 'pk_tab1' or partition of this index is unusable;

    Way?

    And how to avoid problem, like these in the future?
    How to check the index is to rebuild correctly?

    Please show us

    Select index_name, status, user_indexes tablespace_name I where i.index_name = 'PK_TAB1'

    If it stills status INDIVIDUAL... rebuild

    change the PK_TAB1 index rebuild online;

    and check... so again; Drop it and recreate ;)

    Edited by: Surachart (HunterX) on June 16, 2009 13:03

  • How to rebuild a spatial index partition that is marked 'INPROGRS '.

    I'm on 12.1.0.1 Enterprise Edition.

    I have a very large table of sdo_geometry objects that I divided it into several partitions.  I have create a spatial index on this table as UNUSABLE and then rebuild the partitions across a few different sessions.

    In total, the construction of index takes a few days.  Last week during the construction of the index, the database crashed completely.  This left me with most of the scores with a USER_IND_PARTITIONS. USABLE STATUS, some with UNUSABLE and a couple with INPROGRS.

    I can rebuild the UNUSABLE partitions as usual, but when I try to build a INPROGRS partition I get: 

    ERROR at line 1:
ORA-29952: cannot issue DDL on a domain index partition marked as LOADING

    The mistake is understandable, given that the index partition was INPROGRS when the database crashed.  The question is how to recover from it.  The doco says:

    Expect that the index partition operation complete question GOLD FORCE INDEX DROP to remove question OR index an ALTER TABLE DROP PARTITION to delete the partition.

    None of these options are good for me.  I don't want to let down the entire index as most of it is built.  It doesn't seem to be an option to recover a partition of index construction which is blocked at INPROGRS.


    Support Doc ID 557600.1 addresses this issue says in the context of the Oracle text index.  Sa dit :

    Sometimes, if CREATE INDEX or ALTER INDEX fails, an index can be left with the status of LOADING or INPROGRS and let the context index in an unusable state.

    Any attempt to retrieve using SUMMARY INDEX is blocked. The only recourse is to drop and re-create the index.

    In this case, use CTX_ADM. MARK_FAILED to force LOADING failure index status so that you can retrieve the index with the INDEX of CURRICULUM VITAE.

    If the suggestion is to use CTX_ADM. MARK_FAILED ( http://docs.oracle.com/database/121/CCREF/cadmpkg.htm#CCREF0500 ). 

    There is a similar option for spatial indexes?

    Thank you

    John

    Hi John,.

    Have you tried mdsys.reset_inprog_index (owner IN varchar2, varchar2 IN index_name)?

    This procedure will erase INPROGRS and to FAIL if index or index partition is INPROGRS.

    Thank you

    Ying

  • rebuild the index partition

    Hello
    I have unusable a clue. Now I want to rebuild the index for this I have to rebuild the partition and the tablespace in two different command as

    Index_name ALTER INDEX REBUILD PARTITION p1;
    Index_name ALTER INDEX REBUILD PARTITION p1 TABLESPACE INDX_TS;
    now my question is when I run first command and check the index of fof status it shows not usable. In the same way when I ran only 2nd order also rebuild successfully. If I ran only 2nd command works fine?
    why it displays usable after only rebuild partition?


    I have script for all indexes on user like this

    Select 'ALTER INDEX' | index_name |' rebuild partition '. Nom_partition | ';' in USER_IND_PARTITIONS
    Select 'ALTER INDEX' | index_name |' rebuild partition '. NOM_PARTITION | 'SPACE '. nom_tablespace | ';' in USER_IND_PARTITIONS

    Why you set all the indexes to be UNUSABLE?

    (Please don't keep saying "unuse index", do you mean "occupies an unusable index"!)

    The instance / session SKIP_UNUSABLE_INDEXES setting determines the behavior of DML. In 9i, it is false by default. In 10g, it is by default true. Thus, in the 10g (unless you have changed it back to FALSE), INSERT/DELETE operations can succeed even if an Index is UNUSABLE. However, indexes to enforce PRIMARY KEY constraints or unique indexes (index created in CREATE a UNIQUE or apply INDEX of UNIQUE constraints) cannot be ignored by normal DML.

    (Direct path operations automatically update the index and, therefore, can leave clues in an unusable state temporary.) These look like actually to DDL operations and lock the partition table/preventing simultaneous updates).

  • Partitioned global index on partitioned table range, but the index partition does not work

    Hello:

    I was creating an index partitioned on table partitioned and partitioned index does not work.

    create table table_range)

    CUST_FIRST_NAME VARCHAR2 (20).

    CUST_GENDER CHAR (1),

    CUST_CITY VARCHAR2 (30),

    COUNTRY_ISO_CODE CHAR (2),

    COUNTRY_NAME VARCHAR2 (40),

    COUNTRY_SUBREGION VARCHAR2 (30),

    PROD_ID NUMBER NOT NULL,

    CUST_ID NUMBER NOT NULL,

    TIME_ID DATE NOT NULL,

    CHANNEL_ID NUMBER NOT NULL,

    PROMO_ID NUMBER OF NON-NULL,

    QUANTITY_SOLD NUMBER (10.2) NOT NULL,

    AMOUNT_SOLD NUMBER (10.2) NOT NULL

    )

    partition by (range (time_id)

    lower partition p1 values (u01 tablespace to_date('2001/01/01','YYYY/MM/DD')),

    lower partition (to_date('2002/01/01','YYYY/MM/DD')) tablespace u02 p2 values

    );

    create index ind_table_range on table2 (prod_id)

    () global partition range (prod_id)

    values less than (100) partition p1,

    lower partition p2 values (maxvalue)

    );

    SQL > select TABLE_NAME, SUBPARTITION_COUNT, HIGH_VALUE, nom_partition NUM_ROWS of user_tab_partitions;

    TABLE_NAME NOM_PARTITION SUBPARTITION_COUNT HIGH_VALUE NUM_ROWS

    ----------- ---------------- ------------------ -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------

    TABLE_RANGE P2 0 TO_DATE (' 2002-01-01 00:00:00 ',' SYYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS ',' NLS_CALENDAR = GREGORIA 259418)

    TABLE_RANGE P1 0 TO_DATE (' 2001-01-01 00:00:00 ',' SYYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS ',' NLS_CALENDAR = GREGORIA 659425)

    SQL > select INDEX_NAME, NUM_ROWS nom_partition, HIGH_VALUE user_ind_partitions;

    INDEX_NAME NOM_PARTITION HIGH_VALUE NUM_ROWS

    ------------------------------ ------------------------------ -------------------------- ----------

    P1 IND_TABLE_RANGE 100 479520

    IND_TABLE_RANGE P2 MAXVALUE 439323

    SQL > EXECUTE DBMS_STATS. GATHER_TABLE_STATS (USER, 'TABLE_RANGE');

    SQL > EXECUTE DBMS_STATS. GATHER_TABLE_STATS (USER, 'TABLE_RANGE', GRANULARITY = > 'PARTITION');

    SQL > EXECUTE DBMS_STATS. GATHER_INDEX_STATS (USER, 'IND_TABLE_RANGE');

    SQL > EXECUTE DBMS_STATS. GATHER_INDEX_STATS (USER, 'IND_TABLE_RANGE', GRANULARITY = > 'PARTITION');

    SQL > set autotrace traceonly

    SQL > alter shared_pool RAS system;

    SQL > changes the system built-in buffer_cache;

    SQL > select * from table_range

    where prod_id = 127;

    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    | ID | Operation | Name | Lines | Bytes | Cost (% CPU). Time | Pstart. Pstop |

    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT |             | 16469 |  1334K |  3579 (1) | 00:00:43 |       |       |

    |   1.  RANGE OF PARTITION ALL THE |             | 16469 |  1334K |  3579 (1) | 00:00:43 |     1.     2.

    |*  2 |   TABLE ACCESS FULL | TABLE_RANGE | 16469 |  1334K |  3579 (1) | 00:00:43 |     1.     2.

    ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Information of predicates (identified by the operation identity card):

    ---------------------------------------------------

    2 - filter ("PROD_ID" = 127)

    Statistics

    ----------------------------------------------------------

    320 recursive calls

    2 db block Gets

    13352 consistent gets

    11820 physical reads

    0 redo size

    855198 bytes sent via SQL * Net to client

    12135 bytes received via SQL * Net from client

    1067 SQL * Net back and forth to and from the client

    61 sorts (memory)

    0 sorts (disk)

    15984 rows processed

    Once the sentence you say ' does not ' and then you go to paste plans that seem to show that it "works".

    What gives?

    In fact, if you look at the plans - think Oracle you have 16 k rows in the table and he'll be back k 12 rows for your select statement. In this case, Oracle is picking up the right plan - full scan 16 ranks of k is a lot less work to digitize the index lines k 12 followed by the research of rank k 12 rowid.

  • How can I export index partition (DDL)?

    How can I export index partition (DDL)?

    For example:

    PARTITION BY RANGE (ID) INTERVAL (1)  (
PARTITION "XXXXX"  VALUES LESS THAN (1)    
SEGMENT CREATION IMMEDIATE    
PCTFREE 10 PCTUSED 0 INITRANS 1 MAXTRANS 255   
COMPRESS FOR OLTP NOLOGGING    
STORAGE(INITIAL 1 NEXT 2 MINEXTENTS 1 MAXEXTENTS 2000   
PCTINCREASE 0 FREELISTS 1 FREELIST GROUPS 1   
BUFFER_POOL DEFAULT FLASH_CACHE DEFAULT CELL_FLASH_CACHE DEFAULT)   
TABLESPACE "XXXXXXXXX"   )   ;

    Thank you!

    How can I export index partition (DDL)?

    For example:

    1. PARTITION BY INTERVAL OF THE RANGE (ID) () (1)
    2. PARTITION 'XXXXX' LOWER VALUES (1)
    3. CREATION OF IMMEDIATE SEGMENT
    4. PCTFREE, PCTUSED 10 0 INITRANS 1 MAXTRANS 255
    5. COMPRESS FOR OLTP NOLOGGING
    6. STORAGE (INITIAL 1 2 MINEXTENTS 1 MAXEXTENTS 2000)
    7. PCTINCREASE 0 FREELISTS 1 FREELIST GROUPS 1
    8. USER_TABLES FLASH_CACHE, CELL_FLASH_CACHE DEFAULT DEFAULT)
    9. TABLESPACE 'XXXXXXXXX');

    Don't know what you mean... maybe this?

    SQL > 100000 long value

    SQL > select dbms_metadata.get_ddl ('TABLE',')

    ','
    ')

    2 double;

  • Remove the local index partitions

    Hello

    How can I provide clues the only from a few partitions in oracle 10.2.0.4?

    Index partitions a fall

    You cannot explicitly delete a partition of a local index. Instead, the local index partitions are removed only when you delete a partition of the underlying table.

    http://docs.Oracle.com/CD/E18283_01/server.112/e16541/part_admin002.htm#i1007542

  • the indexes are unusable

    Hello

    I am a beginner...

    the indexes are unusable...

    How can I do real state

    You can rebuild the indexes.

  • Why this update needs suddenly an index partitioned locally to run fast?

    Dear,

    ----------------------------------------------------------------
    Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.4.0 - 64bi
    PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
    CORE 10.2.0.4.0 Production
    AMT for Solaris: release 10.2.0.4.0 - Production
    NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.4.0 - Production

    I would like to understand the following situation.

    I have a partitioned table defined as range
    part_tab (id, dat, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i)
    This table is partitioned on dat range and has a primary key on (b, id, dat) covered by a unique index of the tree b (b, id, dat). The PK column order is not the same as in the definition of the table!
    This table is filled every day by a night of employment (140,000 new records inserted every day) and also updated (800,000 updated records) as follows

    for x in (select id, dat, b, c, d, e, f, g, h, i
    distant_tab say - simple heap table having a PK (id, dat, b) and accessible through a dblink
    where dis.dat between trunc (sysdate-7) and trunc (sysdate - 1).
    )
    loop
    Update part_tab loc
    set
    Loc.c = dis.c
    loc.d = dis.d,
    loc.e = dis.e,
    loc.f = dis.f,
    loc.g = dis.g,
    loc.h = dis.h,
    loc.i = dis.i,
    where
    Loc.b = dis.b
    and loc.id = dis.id
    and loc.dat = dis.dat
    end loop;

    commit;

    This update took 40 minutes to finish in PRODUCTION for more than 3 months.

    Last week the distant_tab has been purged and went from 12.000.000 records to 1,000,000 records.
    But the update is still almost a fixed number of records to be updated (800,000 records). Statistics on a remote table has also been updated and the updated runtime remains almost the same (40 minutes).

    Unfortunately, one day, this update started taking 3 hours to complete. So it has been for 3 days until we have created a unique partitioned index local (dat, id, b) on part_tab which
    did the update runing on less than 10 minutes.

    Unique consistency, that I can do with this suddenly high time update is that it starts happening immediately in the distant aftermath of the table
    distant_tab has been shrinked (offline) to set the high-water line. Maybe it has nothing to do with this 3 hours run time but it is worth mentioning.

    So my question is:

    Why this update, which took 40 minutes for more than 3 months, it must now have an index partitioned locally rather than the index b-tree in 10 minutes, otherwise it will take 3 hours?

  • Pass correctly index partition to a different tablespace

    Oracle Version: 10.2.0.3.0

    Hello

    I have a clue of sous-partitionnee - & gt; partitioned by range and sous-partitionnée of the list. I have to move the index to a different tablespace. I moved all the subparts successfully, but views of the index always show me references to former storage space.

    I moved all of the following subparts: ALTER INDEX MYINDEX REBUILD SUBPARTITION MYSUBPARTITION TABLESPACE NEWTABLESPACE;
    Now when I look at 'dba_segments' view corresponding index segments, they are correctly moved to the new tablespace.

    But,

    in the column 'def_tablespace_name' in view 'dba_part_indexes' value is always the old name of the tablespace.
    in the column 'nom_tablespace' in view 'dba_ind_partitions' value is always the old name of the tablespace.

    in the column 'nom_tablespace' in view 'dba_ind_subpartitions' value is correct, making reference to the new tablespace.

    What should I do to have these set correctly values (see dba_part_indexes and dba_ind_partitions)?

    I tried
    ALTER index rebuild partition mypartition tablespace newtablespace myindex;
    but I got the error:

    Error: ORA-14287
    Text: cannot REBUILD a partition of a Composite range partitioned index-
    Cause: The user attempted to rebuild a partition of a partitioned set of Composite
    index which is illegal
    Action: REBUILD the index partition, a subpartition at a time

    Thank you to



    Type of account

    St & eacute; phane

    Published by: user9928511 on March 13, 2009 11:29

    user9928511 wrote:
    Oracle Version: 10.2.0.3.0

    Hello

    I have an index-> partitioned by range and sous-partitionnée of the list subpartitioned. I have to move the index to a different tablespace. I moved all the subparts successfully, but views of the index always show me references to former storage space.

    I moved all of the following subparts: ALTER INDEX MYINDEX REBUILD SUBPARTITION MYSUBPARTITION TABLESPACE NEWTABLESPACE;
    Now when I look at 'dba_segments' view corresponding index segments, they are correctly moved to the new tablespace.

    But,

    in the column 'def_tablespace_name' in view 'dba_part_indexes' value is always the old name of the tablespace.
    in the column 'nom_tablespace' in view 'dba_ind_partitions' value is always the old name of the tablespace.

    Sub-parts are "segments" in your partitioned table. The scores are just a logical grouping of physical subpartitions. then of course, you can not rebuild and it will show the old man a tablespace name.

    def_tablespace_name can be changed with alter index:
    ALTER INDEX index-name DEFAULT ATTRIBUTES ALTER TABLESPACE nom_tablespace;

  • Possible to move data in a partitioned into another tablespace table without indexes becoming UNUSABLE?

    Hello

    We use oracle 11.2.0.3 and know that if move us data into partitions to a different tablespace indexes get marked as UNUSABLE.

    It is the range of composite date hash partitioned table.

    As a result, to rebuild the global and local bitmap index.

    Is it possible to transfer data to one another without the index tablespace becomes UNUSABLE?

    Thank you

    Hello

    If you want to update the index (so that it becomes invalid) while you perform the move partition, you can use the index update clause.

    Details are mentioned in the Oracle documentation. Glue one of the page here for quick reference.

    Maintenance of Partitions

    Note: It has an impact on the duration of this sql statement which may increase or decrease depending on the amount of data to move.

    Concerning

    Anurag

  • Unusable index Partitioned table

    Oracle Version: 11.2.0.2
    OS: Linux RHEL 5

    I'm having a problem with the index on a partitioned table interval. This is the scenario:

    There are 3 indices (A, B, C) on a table. A is created on two columns (1,2), B is on the column (2), C is the column (3). Table is partitioned on column 2 apart. A and B are partitioned indexes. When I drop a partition without a clause to update index, Index C will unusable. After seeing this, I gave up the C rating and create it as a local partitioned index, then all indexes are in condition of use after the drop partition statement. Is - this mandatory on a range partitioned table all indexes on the table must be locally partitioned inorder to have indexes in usable state after the drop statement of partition (without the update index clause)? Also there will be a negative impact for all indexes on the table like locally partitioned indexes?

    >
    Is - this mandatory on a range partitioned table all indexes on the table must be locally partitioned inorder to have indexes in usable state after the drop statement of partition (without the update index clause)?
    >
    Yes - it should be obvious by looking at a simple example.

    You have an OVERALL index and drop a partition but say Oracle are NOT updating the overall index.

    How this index may be usable for anything? It is not accurate. There was GARBAGE everywhere that gets in the way of Oracle find the entries of the "good". There are the index keys in the branch blocks that belong to the partition that has been deleted. Oracle cannot use these keys to determine how the blocks of branch, he needs to find.
    >
    Also there will be a negative impact for all indexes on the table like locally partitioned indexes?
    >
    Who knows? There are maybe or maybe not.

    As with many things Oracle "it depends."

    It depends on what types of queries that you ran.

    It depends on the filter predicates used for query.

    It depends on if the maintenance simple score (add/drop/split) are important to you.

    For the maintenance of the partition only all index LOCAL is the best.

    For full table scan, an index is not intended to be used.

    For a query that needs all THE records for a COMPANY_ID given in a table partitioned by DATE an OVERALL index could be better. Oracle also use 100 index LOCAL (if there are 100 partitions) to get the same data.

    It depends on.

  • partition in maintained growth index, partition of table didn't need to add space.

    Version Oracle 11 g 1 material, OS is aix.

    We have a 100 to dataware house, are partitioned with the index.

    Each table move data 6 months previously and even with the index. However our table tablespace has not seen more, but index tablespace kept more and more, I have to keep adding spaces.

    How to address this issue? where to find the problem is?

    Thanks in advance.

    >
    I joined dba_segments with dba_objects to get nom_segment, owner, created, bytes/1024/1024 as this tablespace.
    . . .
    EVENT_TYPE_HGRAM_DEV STATS INDEX SUBPARTITION 28-SEP-05 DECEMBER 10 05
    1
    >
    Does not the validation of the application and the columns you listed do not match the data that you have posted.

    EVENT_TYPE_HGRAM_DEV - the name says a statistical histogram on the EVENT_TYPE table in the DEV environment. This object name means something to you?

    Enter you two dates but only "created" as a column. And what is the '1' represent?

    You also do not show an OWNER but mention a column 'owner '.

    Which table is, or has been, this index belong to? The table still exists? Have you purged the recyclebins?

  • Create index partition in the partition table tablespace

    Hello

    I am running a work custom that

    * Creates a tablespace by day
    * Creates the daily table partition in the created tablespace
    * Removes the days tablepartition X
    * Removes the storage space for this partition of X + 1 day.

    The work above works perfectly, but it has problems with the management of the index for these partitioned tables. In the old database (10g - single node), all indexes and partitions exist in a BIG tablespace and when I imported the table creation script in the new database, I changed all the partitions table & index to go in their respective space.

    For example:

    Table_name... Nom_partition... Index_Part_name... Tablespace_name
    ============...================............====================...........=================
    TABL1... TABL1_2012_07_16... TABL1_IDX_2012_07_16... TBS_2012_07_16
    TABL1... TABL1_2012_07_15... TABL1_IDX_2012_07_15... TBS_2012_07_15


    But now, when the job is run, it creates the index in the tablespace TBS_DATA default.

    Table_name... Nom_partition... Index_Part_name... Tablespace_name
    ============...================.............====================...........=================
    TABL1... TABL1_2012_08_16... TABL1_IDX_2012_08_16... TBS_DATA
    TABL1... TABL1_2012_08_15... TABL1_IDX_2012_08_15... TBS_DATA


    I can issue alter index rebuild to move the index to its tablespace default, but how can I make sure that the index is created in the designated tablespace?

    NOTE: the partition/tablespace management work that I run only creates the partition of the table and not the index.


    The new env is a cluster of CARS of 2 nodes 11 GR 2 on Linux x86_64.


    Thanks in advance,
    aBBy.

    try something like this

    ALTER table tab_owner.tab_name add the partition v_new_part_nm
    values less (to_date('''|| v_new_part_dt_formatted ||'') ((', "DD-MON-YYYY)) tablespace ' | part_tbs
    update the index (ind1_name (partition ind_partition_name tablespace ind_part_tbs)
    ind2_name (partition tablespace ind_part_tbs ind_partition_name))
    ;

  • After spending tables and index a different tablespace, index got unusable?

    Hello

    I moved to table and index a different tablespace. After the many indices obtained unusable. I did not understand thiis?

    How can I do still usable?

    best regards and thank you?

    If you bâtait the index (after moving the table, by the way), then they should be usable without something extra to see.
    Check this procedure only one (small) table and index if this index can be used later. If not, then you have a mystery :-)

    Kind regards
    Uwe Hesse

    http://uhesse.WordPress.com

Maybe you are looking for