Internet gateway

Similar Questions

• Enable the Windows XP INTERNET gateway

  Hello

  I'll put up my NAS to allow me to access my office remotely. During an installation of the wizard provided by QNAP, it cannot detect my router UPNP I already enable UPNP option. I run then a few UPNP test and he advice me to activate INTERNET gateway. Can you please give me a guide on how to enable the Windows XP INTERNET gateway? I can only find guide to activate Vista and Windows 7. Thank you very much.

  Kind regards

  Chang

  Here is my config

  Windows XP (SP3)

  NAS QNAP TS-259pro +.

  Router Linksys WRT320N

  Hello

  I suggest you to see link below and check if it helps.

  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/821371/en-us

  Hope this information is useful.

• Help with major security problem if you please. Internet gateway?

  Hello

  After a few weeks of scratches all about untangle sceurity perceived a few questions with email etc. - yesterday I belive I discovered a big problem and need some help please.

  I hope that I write from own machine because I believe that desktop home computers are compromised.

  Main PC is running XP and has a connection via a cable ethernet via a bt Home Hub2.

  Yetsrday while watching my network connections I noticed something called "Internet GATEWAY" above my LAN icon.

  It showed that I had been connected for over 2 days (a little more than 2 hours for the LAN) even when the PC off and was send/receive many packages and seemed much faster than my LAN. problem: I click on this & it won't let me log out or see properties / settings - I get a warning about 'connection is currently unavailable '... I really worry that it is someone else on my PC - is this right? How can I fix it? and it is a matter for the Police.? I'm really worried. Other symptoms, I noticed - my windows log on 'his' dissapraed a & in the event Manager-, there is no security - only since 2006 newspaper.  Very slow PC. Running SuperAntispyware - no problem after removing a Security Center option turn off a few days ago.  Really gratfeul l to help guys. Am at my wits end. Very garteful using anyones.  I guess that my internet connection and PC was hacked/compromised.

  To be clear, you remove all networking services, but just the part that detects and controls "gateways" as your router.  This removes the "Internet gateway" of network connections icon, but should not do something else.

  If a right click or double click on the "Internet gateway" just produced a message "connection is busy", which makes me think that something is not configured correctly - either the router (bt Home Hub) has turned off UPnP (or does not really support) or the UPnP in network services service is not installed, or something else.

  I don't think that someone else is controlling your connection, but as I said, the other symptoms you describe indicate a malware problem continues and you need to take steps to ensure that your machine is free from malware.

• Why apear internet gateways in network connections

  In Windows XP, I click on network connections and internet gateway is sometimes there and sometimes not.  Why is this?

  Thanks for any help.

  Jack

  This can occur if you do not have your own point of access to the House, but connects directly to the front door of your ISP.

  My ISP were some gateways that I see, but others which shows nothing. And as they change what bridge I use, an Internet gateway sometimes appears in my network connections.

• "Internet gateway" - NOT a TYPING error! Is this a known Ms error?

  I connect to a wireless router, and I do not share my connection with someone else. I have a Verizon FIOS fiber internet service. After some installation of their programs running, I noticed an icon (with two computers) that appear in my taskbar, which says "Internet gateway" If hovered you over it. Sometimes he would show 'connected', but most of the time he would show "disconnected" (if she showed at all).

  Lately, he has been showing much and appearing as "connected." My performance has also suffered, I decided to look more closely at this "Internet gateway". I tried to click 'disconnect', but she would not obey. When I clicked on 'Status', a box appears showing 'Internet' (globe), 'My Computer' and "Internet Gateway" (again, no misspelling.)

  I wouldn't spend Microsoft leave a misspelling as this sucked into production (and never fix it with Service Packs or updates), but'd me also suspect that someone had created a piece of malware which resembled the Internet gateway, but who did bad things and resisted to disabled. Can someone confirm for me if it is a legitimate spelling of Microsoft error or if I should indeed suspect this process as a malware?

  Thank you

  G

  1. you would be better to start a new thread... the fact that it is marked as 'Responded' will keep a lot of people see things.

  Uh, duhhh... What is the right way for me to do that? Do I have to ask the question again and just include a link to this post?

  Yes, this is the way to do

  2 re your post last Sunday where reference you the site practically networked - I'm not sure of the spelling, but if you see "Internet gateway" in network connections, it's just your router via UPnP, Microsoft.

  If you have a compatible router UPnP - and most are these days - and you enable UPnP in router configuration (often) utility, and you have enabled UPnP user interface, you get the "Internet gateway" icon in network connections.  You can use the icon to configure the router without using the web interface of the router.

  I don't think I have UPnP enabled for this connection. I don't see the Internet gateway in network connections. only in the system tray.

  Thanks for your help and advice, PML!

  G

  Even if you don't think you have UPnP turned on, you can be certain that it is not.  When Microsoft first introduced UPnP, several people a bit paranoid (including the FBI) said that it should be disabled on each machine.  Steve Gibson, which some might say takes such things a bit too strongly, apparently still accepts 10 years later, and has a simple utility to turn UPnP: http://www.grc.com/unpnp/unpnp.htm

• ASA 5505 as internet gateway (must reverse NAT)

  Hi all the Cisco guru

  I have this diet:

  Office-> Cisco 877-> Internet-> ASA 5505-> remote network

  Office network: 192.168.10.0/24

  Cisco 877 IP internal: 192.168.10.200

  Cisco 877 external IP: a.a.a.a

  ASA 5505 external IP: b.b.b.b

  ASA 5505 internal IP: 192.168.1.3 and 192.168.17.3

  Remote network: 192.168.17.0/24 and 192.168.1.0/24

  VPN tunnel is OK and more. I have the Office Access to the remote network and the remote network access to the bureau by the tunnel.

  But when I try to access the network remotely (there are 2 VLANS: management and OLD-private) to the internet, ASA answer me:

  305013 *. * NAT rules asymetrique.64.9 matched 53 for flows forward and backward; Connection for udp src OLD-Private:192.168.17.138/59949 dst WAN:*.*.64.9/53 refused due to path failure reverse that of NAT

  Ping of OLD-private interface to google result:

  110003 192.168.17.2 0 66.102.7.104 0 routing cannot locate the next hop for icmp NP identity Ifc:192.168.17.2/0 to OLD-Private:66.102.7.104/0

  Result of traceroute

  

  How can I fix reverse NAT and make ASA as internet gateway?

  There is my full config

  !
  ASA Version 8.2 (2)
  !
  hostname ASA2
  domain default.domain.invalid
  activate the encrypted password password
  encrypted passwd password
  names of
  !
  interface Vlan1
  Description INTERNET
  1234.5678.0002 Mac address
  nameif WAN
  security-level 100
  IP address b.b.b.b 255.255.248.0
  OSPF cost 10
  !
  interface Vlan2
  OLD-PRIVATE description
  1234.5678.0202 Mac address
  nameif OLD-private
  security-level 0
  IP 192.168.17.3 255.255.255.0
  OSPF cost 10
  !
  interface Vlan6
  Description MANAGEMENT
  1234.5678.0206 Mac address
  nameif management
  security-level 0
  192.168.1.3 IP address 255.255.255.0
  OSPF cost 10
  !
  interface Ethernet0/0
  !
  interface Ethernet0/1
  Shutdown
  !
  interface Ethernet0/2
  Shutdown
  !
  interface Ethernet0/3
  Shutdown
  !
  interface Ethernet0/4
  Shutdown
  !
  interface Ethernet0/5
  Shutdown
  !
  interface Ethernet0/6
  switchport trunk allowed vlan 2.6
  switchport mode trunk
  !
  interface Ethernet0/7
  Shutdown
  !
  connection of the banner * W A R N I N G *.
  banner connect unauthorized access prohibited. All access is
  connection banner monitored, and intruders will be prosecuted
  connection banner to the extent of the law.
  Banner motd * W A R N I N G *.
  Banner motd unauthorised access prohibited. All access is
  Banner motd monitored and trespassers will be prosecuted
  Banner motd to the extent of the law.
  boot system Disk0: / asa822 - k8.bin
  passive FTP mode
  DNS domain-lookup WAN
  DNS server-group DefaultDNS
  Server name dns.dns.dns.dns
  domain default.domain.invalid
  permit same-security-traffic intra-interface
  object-group Protocol TCPUDP
  object-protocol udp
  object-tcp protocol
  object-group service RDP - tcp
  RDP description
  EQ port 3389 object
  Access extensive list ip 192.168.17.0 LAN_nat0_outbound allow 255.255.255.0 192.168.10.0 255.255.255.0
  Standard access list LAN_IP allow 192.168.17.0 255.255.255.0
  WAN_access_in list of allowed ip extended access all any debug log
  WAN_access_in list extended access permitted ip OLD-private interface WAN newspaper inactive debugging interface
  WAN_access_in list extended access permit tcp any object-group RDP any RDP log debugging object-group
  MANAGEMENT_access_in list of allowed ip extended access all any debug log
  access-list extended OLD-PRIVATE_access_in any allowed ip no matter what debug log
  access-list OLD-PRIVATE_access_in extended permit ip 192.168.10.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.17.0 255.255.255.0 inactive debug log
  OLD-PRIVATE_access_in allowed extended object-group TCPUDP host 192.168.10.7 access-list no matter how inactive debug log
  access-list OLD-PRIVATE_access_in allowed extended icmp host 192.168.10.254 interface private OLD newspaper inactive debugging
  access-list OLD-PRIVATE_access_in allowed extended icmp host 192.168.17.155 interface private OLD newspaper debugging
  access-list 101 extended allow host tcp 192.168.10.7 any eq 3389 debug log
  Access extensive list ip 192.168.17.0 WAN_1_cryptomap allow 255.255.255.0 192.168.10.0 255.255.255.0
  WAN_1_cryptomap to access ip 192.168.1.0 scope list allow 255.255.255.0 192.168.10.0 255.255.255.0
  WAN_cryptomap_2 to access ip 192.168.1.0 scope list allow 255.255.255.0 192.168.10.0 255.255.255.0
  Capin list extended access permit ip host 192.18.17.155 192.168.10.7
  Capin list extended access permit ip host 192.168.10.7 192.168.17.155
  LAN_access_in list of allowed ip extended access all any debug log
  Access extensive list ip 192.168.17.0 WAN_nat0_outbound allow 255.255.255.0 192.168.10.0 255.255.255.0
  Access extensive list ip 192.168.17.0 WAN_2_cryptomap allow 255.255.255.0 192.168.10.0 255.255.255.0

  permit inside_nat0_outbound to access extended list ip 192.168.10.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.17.0 255.255.255.0
  pager lines 24
  Enable logging
  recording of debug trap
  logging of debug asdm
  Debugging trace record
  Debug class auth record trap
  MTU 1500 WAN
  MTU 1500 OLD-private
  MTU 1500 management
  mask 192.168.1.150 - 192.168.1.199 255.255.255.0 IP local pool VPN_Admin_IP
  no failover
  ICMP unreachable rate-limit 1 burst-size 1
  ICMP permitted host a.a.a.a WAN
  ICMP deny any WAN
  ICMP permitted host 192.168.10.7 WAN
  ICMP permitted host b.b.b.b WAN
  ASDM image disk0: / asdm - 631.bin
  don't allow no asdm history
  ARP timeout 14400
  Global (OLD-private) 1 interface
  Global interface (management) 1
  NAT (WAN) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0

  inside_nat0_outbound (WAN) NAT 0 access list
  WAN_access_in access to the WAN interface group
  Access-group interface private-OLD OLD-PRIVATE_access_in
  Access-group MANAGEMENT_access_in in the management interface
  Route WAN 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 b.b.b.185 1
  Timeout xlate 03:00
  Timeout conn 01:00 half-closed 0:10:00 udp 0:02:00 icmp 0:00:02
  Sunrpc timeout 0:10:00 h323 0:05:00 h225 mgcp from 01:00 0:05:00 mgcp-pat 0:05:00
  Sip timeout 0:30:00 sip_media 0:02:00 prompt Protocol sip-0: 03:00 sip - disconnect 0:02:00
  Timeout sip-provisional-media 0:02:00 uauth 0:05:00 absolute
  timeout tcp-proxy-reassembly 0:01:00
  dynamic-access-policy-registration DfltAccessPolicy
  the ssh LOCAL console AAA authentication
  local AAA authentication attempts 10 max in case of failure
  Enable http server
  http 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0 WAN
  http 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 WAN
  http b.b.b.b 255.255.255.255 WAN
  No snmp server location
  No snmp Server contact
  Server enable SNMP traps snmp authentication linkup, linkdown cold start
  Service resetoutside
  Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-DES-SHA esp - esp-sha-hmac
  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-SHA-ESP-3DES-3des esp-sha-hmac
  life crypto ipsec security association seconds 28800
  Crypto ipsec kilobytes of life - safety 4608000 association
  card crypto WAN_map 1 corresponds to the address WAN_1_cryptomap
  card crypto WAN_map 1 set peer a.a.a.a
  WAN_map 1 transform-set ESP-DES-SHA crypto card game
  card crypto WAN_map WAN interface
  ISAKMP crypto enable WAN
  crypto ISAKMP policy 10
  preshared authentication
  3des encryption
  sha hash
  Group 2
  life 86400
  crypto ISAKMP policy 30
  preshared authentication
  the Encryption
  sha hash
  Group 1
  life 86400
  Telnet timeout 5
  SSH a.a.a.a 255.255.255.255 WAN
  SSH timeout 30
  SSH version 2
  Console timeout 0
  dhcpd auto_config management
  !

  a basic threat threat detection
  host of statistical threat detection
  Statistics-list of access threat detection
  a statistical threat detection tcp-interception rate-interval 30 burst-400-rate average rate 200
  NTP server 129.6.15.28 source WAN prefer
  WebVPN
  attributes of Group Policy DfltGrpPolicy
  Protocol-tunnel-VPN IPSec l2tp ipsec svc webvpn
  internal admin group strategy
  group admin policy attributes
  DNS.DNS.DNS.DNS value of DNS server
  Protocol-tunnel-VPN IPSec
  Split-tunnel-policy tunnelspecified
  value of Split-tunnel-network-list LAN_IP
  privilege of encrypted password password username administrator 15
  type tunnel-group admin remote access
  tunnel-group admin general attributes
  address pool VPN_Admin_IP
  strategy-group-by default admin
  tunnel-group a.a.a.a type ipsec-l2l
  tunnel-group a.a.a.a general-attributes
  strategy-group-by default admin
  a.a.a.a group of tunnel ipsec-attributes
  pre-shared-key *.
  NOCHECK Peer-id-validate
  !
  class-map inspection_default
  match default-inspection-traffic
  !
  !
  type of policy-card inspect dns preset_dns_map
  parameters
  maximum message length automatic of customer
  message-length maximum 512
  Policy-map global_policy
  class inspection_default
  inspect the preset_dns_map dns
  inspect the ftp
  inspect h323 h225
  inspect the h323 ras
  inspect the rsh
  inspect the rtsp
  inspect esmtp
  inspect sqlnet
  inspect the skinny
  inspect sunrpc
  inspect xdmcp
  inspect the sip
  inspect the netbios
  inspect the tftp
  Review the ip options
  !

  Thank you for your time and help

  Why you use this NAT type?

  Access extensive list ip 192.168.17.0 WAN_nat0_outbound allow 255.255.255.0 any
  NAT (OLD-private) 0-list of access WAN_nat0_outbound

  You are basically saying the ASA not NAT traffic. This private IP address range is not routed on the Internet. This traffic is destined to be sent over the Internet? If so, that LAC should then not be there.

  If you want NAT traffic to one IP public outside the ASA, you must remove this line and let the NAT and GLOBAL work:

  NAT (OLD-private) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0

  Global (WAN) 1 interface

• Windows Update clears my default internet gateway setting

  Win 2008 Server operating system

  I did the windows updates last night when I turned off the computer for the day.
  I was today - unable to connect to the internet. What I found to be the root of the problem, is that there can be no entry for a default gateway address.
  Since then, I found that if I put the IP (v4) DHCP settings - then everything is ok. When you specify a static ip address there are some problems with the address of the bridge not saved, but most of the time, it worked. However, restarts, the default gateway was again absent.

  So basically my current workaround is to switch back and between dhcp and static to get my correct configuration.

  Anyone know why this is happening?

  Thank you

  Thank you for visiting the website of Microsoft Windows Vista Community. The question you have posted is related to Windows Server 2008 and would be better suited to the TechNet community. Please visit the link below to find a community that will provide the support you want.

  http://TechNet.Microsoft.com/en-us/bb676078.aspx

  Martin
  Microsoft Answers Support Engineer
  Visit our Microsoft answers feedback Forum and let us know what you think

• SGE2000P - InterVLAN Routing & internet Gateway

  Hi all

  I read articles and discussions on the forum for a while now, as I'm collecting information before the design of any change to network or make purchases.

  Currently, we have a simple network and we intend to 'upgrade' it a bit. We want to implement VLANs to separate wireless clients, Desktop + servers and infrastructure equipment form between them.

  From now, we have no VLAN and no manageable. We have a RV016 that handles both Internet service providers and a 3rd party connection for branches of office service (I think they are using Frame Relay, but we know, we are not concerned because we cannot touch their devices)

  The reason behind the title, pointing to the famous SGE2000P, is that my workplace is located in Argentina... and we do not have as much choice as some of you guys! Actually, I was trying to get a Cisco partner to contact me unsuccessfully. We would like to replace the with a cisco RV016 1941 (and a HWIC change card).

  So, back to business... ! Assuming that we use SGE2000P switches, I thought on the definition of VLANs with 802. 1 q seven of these switches, as well as a router from Cisco 1941. I'm waiting for the 1941 to manage a balancing between the two ISPS and the 3rd party link. Now, for what is the Inter VLAN routing I would have gigabit traffic between the VLANS. It is not imperative but it would be a nice feature and appreciated, (Besides, our current system works at speeds of 10/100. I know, it's hard to believe, but it's the truth!).

  so my question is...

  Is it possible to use an EMS as Layer 3 to hande traffic inter VLAN mode (gigabit speed) while using the 1941 as an endpoint device to reach internet (using PAT)?

  Would you suggest me to use the 1941 for Inter VLAN routing, despite the limitation (*) 10/100 and use all the EMS is in L2 mode?

  (*): We need to two Internet service providers, a third link to connect to EN and finally the LAN interface. As far as I know, I'm limited to integrated into a thin WAN gigabit interfaces, am I right?

  Thanks in advance!

  Agustin.

  Hi Agustin, the switch is able to control the traffic of inter - vlan in layer 3. The trick to make it work is to ensure the default gateway of connection of hosts to be that they are a member of the SVI.

  I highly recommend that you do not use the stack of these switches feature, especially if you plan to have 7 of them. The implementation of the stack is kind of poor and can give problems of reliability especially in mode layer 3.

  I think it's probably better to have the switch to handle routing more before he goes to the router, it should help the performance of the network, such that it should aggregate traffic.

  You need only 1 of the EMS in mode layer 3, the rest should stay mode layer 2, unless you have a specific reason otherwise. For the performance of the network, the other 6 switches must be layer 2.

  -Tom
  Please mark replied messages useful

• Windows Server 2008 R2 DHCP assigns no default gateway

  Hi all

  I have a little problem with my WS2K8R2 DHCP role. I have successfully setup the role & authorized, it now serves customers on the network, but for some reason, does not provide an address of gateway by default with the lease, so unless I have manually assign the address DG on the client, it cannot access the internet.

  The DG address is my Internet gateway. I did not like the system DHCP built in & wanted to use DHCP WS.

  Any suggestions?

  Thanks Rory.

  Windows Server forums:
  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en/category/WindowsServer

• How to add the routing of the internet (0.0.0.0) in the Linksys WRT54G2

  I want to add internet routing via an interface on the Linksys WRT54G2, usually in the PC / NB who want to connect to the internet after connecting to the wireless router, I use Route Add 0.0.0.0 mask 255.255.255.0 192.168.2.150 (that is 192.168.2.150, it is our gateway to the internet) or simply to set the proxy server in the browser.

  but to connect your handheld (such as the blackberry) that is wireless, it can not use internet and I cannot add the routing in the blackberry device, so the only way how to connect to the internet is the use of the routing of the Linksys wireless router, but when I add 0.0.0.0 in the route in advance, it shows an invalid IP address anyone experienced the same? Help, please...

  Thanks in advance,

  Nathaniel Franky

  1. you must turn off the DHCP server on the WRT and use instead a DHCP server on your gateway internet (or another DHCP server). The DHCP server assigns the default gateway for clients. It must be the correct internet gateway. Do not use the DHCP server on the WRT.

  2. the WRT will never accept a default route. It is designed to be the internet gateway. It will always use its own IP address as default for DHCP offers gateway (if the WRT DHCP server is enabled). It will always be to route internet traffic to the internet port of the WRT which must be connected to the internet.

• Using WRT54GS as a point with a gateway router

  My family just moved into a new House, and the package Internet for our DSL included installation of a router wireless (non-Linksys) and the (plugged into the DSL modem) Internet gateway down in the basement.  The problem is that the intensity of the signal on the 2nd floor is very low, sometimes non-existent.  Since we have a Linksys WRT54GS router v.2 lying around the previous House, I thought that I would try to put up with our main router, to set up a new network on the 2nd floor by using the ethernet connection.

  But I keep running into trouble.  I have reset the router so that I know how to find all the settings and I can now access the admin wireless page and I managed to change the network name, and also to configure encryption.  That's all before you connect to the Internet, so of course I can only access the admin page and nothing else.

  But once I plug the ethernet cable - which leads directly to the bridge down - router the Linksys router just stopped working and is no longer distributes all packets at all when I check the connection details.  It does not even serve to the top of the admin page, even if my computer indicates a connection.  Reset the cords for connection to a "Limited or no connectivity" error, both with the wireless connection and also a wired connection using a standard ethernet cable to the back of the Linksys router in my computer.  It's as if plug the Linksys router on the Internet (i.e. the other router) it freezes or it confuses.  I can only make it work again by disconnecting the active Internet cable and turn off the router and then turn it back on.

  I tried to change the mode of operation to the router, and I also changed the default address of my other router (192.168.1.1, which otherwise, would share it with the Linksys router) out of the way but none of it works.

  Once again, I can access the admin wireless page and make all kinds of changes to the installation and get it works perfectly - until I plug my other router (i.e., for reference, a TRENDnet TEW-432BRP) Linksys.

  Since all wired computers work fine with the TRENDnet router modem, I am writing to you guys for helping me understand how to configure the Linksys router to work with her too, so I can use wireless on the 2nd floor of this House.

  Of course, if you think this is impossible for some reason, please let me know so that I can live with it and get my life back.

  Thank you very much.

  Well, you can try this... Cascade of the router...

  Just connect a computer directly to the router Linksys - access your router (WRT54GS) setup and change the default address to 10.10.10.1, let the 'Enabled' DHCP server and save the changes... Wait a minute, unplug the power cable from your router, wait 30 seconds and reconnect the power cable...

  Now connect your router to bridge its Ethernet Port to the Internet Port Linksys router... See if you can connect to the Internet...

• Using Windows Vista and Windows Media Player with Sanyo R227 Internet Radio

  I just bought a Sanyo R227 Internet Radio wireless.  He has no problem using my home network wireless and find the Internet gateway and play Internet radio stations.

  However, it also has the ability to access and attendance of the media playing on shared Music folders.   The installation instructions are very simple, but again, I have to be able to connect.  (Someone else I know has no problem with XP).  Read the fine print, Sanyo said it is checked with Windows 2000 and Windows XP, but there is no mention of Vista.  When I emailed them, they said that they did not support Vista.  However, I found a few articles to say that they tested it with Vista, just no mention of what they did to make it work.  I don't know that Sanyo is not interested in checking out Vista, because Windows 7 is now available.

  I have a Toshiba laptop running Windows Vista Home Premium SP 2 and Windows Media Player Version 11.  Also, I have Symmatic installed Smart Firewall (Norton) and enabled Windows Media Player and Windows Media Player network sharing service. I got Symmatic take possession of my PC and make sure these settings are correct.

  I turned on the multimedia file sharing, file sharing and network discovery.  Because my PC is to use the Norton Firewall, Windows Firewall is disabled.  The network type is Public.  Privacy requires the Windows Firewall, which confuses the Norton Firewall.

  When I scan to PC on the webradio of Sanyo R227, he never finds my laptop.  I'll try to turn off the Norton Firewall and see what happens, but I don't think that's the problem.

  Anyone out there have experience with this device, media player and Vista?

  Turn off the Norton Firewall and it worked.  Now I have to talk to Symantec and find a way to make it work with the firewall turned on.

• Routing access to Internet through an IPSec VPN Tunnel

  Hello

  I installed a VPN IPSec tunnel for a friend's business. At his desk at home, I installed a Cisco SA520 and at it is remote from the site I have a Cisco RVS4000. The IPSec VPN tunnel works very well. The remote site, it can hit all of its workstations and peripheral. I configured the RVS4000 working in router mode as opposed to the bridge. In the Home Office subnet is 192.168.1.0/24 while the subnet to the remote site is 192.168.2.0/24. The SA520 is configured as Internet gateway for the headquarters to 192.168.1.1. The remote desktop has a gateway 192.168.2.1.

  I need to configure the remote site so that all Internet traffic will be routed via the Home Office. I have to make sure that whatever it is plugged into the Ethernet on the RVS4000 port will have its Internet traffic routed through the Internet connection on the SA520. Currently I can ping any device on the headquarters of the remote desktop, but I can't ping anything beyond the gateway (192.168.1.1) in the Home Office.

  Any help would be greatly appreciated.

  Thank you.

  Hi William, the rvs4000 does not support the tunnel or esp transfer wild-card.

• DMVPN and INTERNET VIA HUB RENTAL ISSUES

  Hello everyone,

  I really wish you can help me with the problem I have.

  I explain. I test a double Hub - double DMVPN Layout for a client before we set it up in actual production.
  The client has sites where routers are behind some ISP routers who do NAT.

  

  How things are configured:

  -All rays traffic must go through the location of the hub if no local internet traffic on the rays.
  -Hub 1 and 2 hub sends a default route to rays through EIGRP. But only Hub 1 is used.
  -Hub 1 is the main router to DMVPN. In case of connection / hardware failure of the Internet Hub 2 become active for DMVPN and Internet.
  -Hub 1 and 2 hub are both connected to an ISP and Internet gateway for rays.
  -Hub 1 and 2 hub are configured with IOS Firewall.
  -On the shelves I used VRF for separate DMVPN routning Global routning table so I could receive a default route of 1 Hub and Hub 2 to carry the traffic of rays to the Internet via the location of the hub

  What works:

  -All rays can have access to the local network to the location of the hub.
  -All the rays can do talk of talk
  -Working for DMVPN failover
  -Rais NOT behind the router NAT ISP (i.e. the public IP address) directly related to their external interface can go Internet via hub location and all packages are inspected properly by the IOS and Nat firewall properly
   
  What does not work:

  -Rays behind the NAT ISP router can not access Internet via Hub location. They can reach a local network to the location of the hub and talk of talks.
  IOS Firewall Router hub shows packages from rays of theses (behind a NAT) with a source IP address that is the router og PSI of public IP address outside the interface. Not the private address LAN IP back spoke.
  In addition, the packets are never natted. If I do some captge on an Internet Server, the private source IP is the IP LAN to the LAN behind the rays. This means that the hub, router nat never these packages.

  How to solve this problem?

  / * Style definitions * / table. MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name : « Tabel - Normal » ; mso-tstyle-rowband-taille : 0 ; mso-tstyle-colband-taille : 0 ; mso-style-noshow:yes ; mso-style-priorité : 99 ; mso-style-qformat:yes ; mso-style-parent : » « ;" mso-rembourrage-alt : 0 cm 5.4pt cm 0 5.4pt ; mso-para-margin : 0 cm ; mso-para-marge-bottom : .0001pt ; mso-pagination : widow-orphelin ; police-taille : 11.0pt ; famille de police : « Calibri », « sans-serif » ; mso-ascii-font-family : Calibri ; mso-ascii-theme-font : minor-latin ; mso-fareast-font-family : « Times New Roman » ; mso-fareast-theme-font : minor-fareast ; mso-hansi-font-family : Calibri ; mso-hansi-theme-font : minor-latin ; mso-bidi-font-family : « Times New Roman » ; mso-bidi-theme-font : minor-bidi ;}

  Well I don't know that's why I need your help/advice :-)

  I don't know that if I have to configure a VRF on the location of the hub gets also like things might mess upward.

  The problem seems to be NAT - T the rays that are not behind a NAT, among which go over the Internet through a Hub and inspection of Cisco IOS and NAT are trying to find.

  I tested today with the customer at the start them talking behind nat could ping different server on the Internet but not open an HTTP session. DNS was to find work. The IOS Firewall has been actually

  inspection of packages with private real IP address. Then I thought it was a MTU issue, so I decided to do a ping on the Internet with the largest MTU size and suddenly the pings were no more.

  I could see on the router Hub1 IOS Firewall was inspecting the public IP of the ISP NAT router again alongside with rays and not more than the actual IP address private. Really strange!

  Attached files:

  I attach the following files: a drawing of configuration called drawing-Lab - Setup.jpeg | All files for HUB1, BRANCH1 and BRANCH2 ISP-ROUTER configs, named respectively: HUB1.txt, BRANCH1.txt, BRANCH2.txt and ISP - ROUTER .txt

  Hub1 newspapers when ping host 200.200.200.200 on the Internet of Branch2 (behind the NAT ISP router):

  Branch2 #ping vrf DMVPN-VRF 200.200.200.200 source vlan 100

  Type to abort escape sequence.
  Send 5, echoes ICMP 100 bytes to 200.200.200.200, time-out is 2 seconds:
  Packet sent with a source address of 192.168.110.1
  .....
  Success rate is 0% (0/5)

  * 06:04:51.017 Jul 15 UTC: % FW-6-SESS_AUDIT_TRAIL_START: start session icmp: initiator (110.10.10.2:8) - answering machine (200.200.200.200:0)

  If the IOS Firewall does not inspect the true private source IP address that can be, in this case: 192.168.110.2. He sess on the public IP address.

  HUB1 #sh ip nat translations
  Inside global internal local outside global local outdoor Pro
  ICMP 80.10.10.2:1 80.10.10.2:1 100.10.10.2:1 100.10.10.2:1
  ICMP 80.10.10.2:2 80.10.10.2:2 110.10.10.2:2 110.10.10.2:2
  UDP 80.10.10.2:4500 80.10.10.2:4500 110.10.10.2:4500 110.10.10.2:4500

  There is no entry for packets of teas present NAT

  Captge on Tunnel 1 on Hub1 interface (incoming packets in):

  7 7.355997 192.168.110.1 200.200.200.200 request ICMP (ping) echo
  So that the firewall controllable IOS to the 110.10.10.2:8 public IP sniffing capture said that the package come from private real IP address

  Inhalation of vapours on the server (200.200.200.200) with wireshark:

  114 14.123552 192.168.110.1 200.200.200.200 request ICMP (ping) echo

  If the private IP address of source between local network of BRANCH2 is never natted by HUB1

  If the server sees the address source IP private not natted although firewall IOS Hub1 inspect the public IP address 110.10.10.2:8

  Hub1 newspapers when ping host 200.200.200.200 on the Internet of Branch1 (not behind the NAT ISP router):

  Branch1 #ping vrf DMVPN-VRF 200.200.200.200 source vlan 100

  Type to abort escape sequence.
  Send 5, echoes ICMP 100 bytes to 200.200.200.200, time-out is 2 seconds:
  Packet sent with a source 192.168.100.1 address
  !!!!!

  * 06:05:18.217 Jul 15 UTC: % FW-6-SESS_AUDIT_TRAIL_START: start session icmp: initiator (192.168.100.1:8) - answering machine (200.200.200.200:0)

  This is so the firewall sees the actual private IP which is 192.168.100.1

  HUB1 #sh ip nat translations
  Inside global internal local outside global local outdoor Pro
  ICMP 80.10.10.2:1 80.10.10.2:1 100.10.10.2:1 100.10.10.2:1
  ICMP 80.10.10.2:2 80.10.10.2:2 110.10.10.2:2 110.10.10.2:2
  UDP 80.10.10.2:4500 80.10.10.2:4500 110.10.10.2:4500 110.10.10.2:4500
  ICMP 80.10.10.2:22 192.168.100.1:22 200.200.200.200:22 200.200.200.200:22

  The real private source IP address is also find natted 1 Hub outside the public IP address

  Captge on Tunnel 1 on Hub1 interface (incoming packets in):

  8 7.379997 192.168.100.1 200.200.200.200 request ICMP (ping) echo

  Real same as inspected by IOS Firewall so all private IP address is y find.

  Inhalation of vapours on the server (200.200.200.200) with wireshark:

  / * Style definitions * / table. MsoNormalTable {mso-style-name : « Tabel - Normal » ; mso-tstyle-rowband-taille : 0 ; mso-tstyle-colband-taille : 0 ; mso-style-noshow:yes ; mso-style-priorité : 99 ; mso-style-qformat:yes ; mso-style-parent : » « ;" mso-rembourrage-alt : 0 cm 5.4pt cm 0 5.4pt ; mso-para-margin : 0 cm ; mso-para-marge-bottom : .0001pt ; mso-pagination : widow-orphelin ; police-taille : 11.0pt ; famille de police : « Calibri », « sans-serif » ; mso-ascii-font-family : Calibri ; mso-ascii-theme-font : minor-latin ; mso-fareast-font-family : « Times New Roman » ; mso-fareast-theme-font : minor-fareast ; mso-hansi-font-family : Calibri ; mso-hansi-theme-font : minor-latin ; mso-bidi-font-family : « Times New Roman » ; mso-bidi-theme-font : minor-bidi ;}

  67 10.441153 80.10.10.2 200.200.200.200 request ICMP (ping) echo

  So, here's all right. The address is natted correctly.

  __________________________________________________________________________________________

  Best regards

  Laurent

  Hello

  Just saw your message, I hope this isn't too late.

  I don't know what your exact problem, but I think we can work through it to understand it.

  One thing I noticed was that your NAT ACL is too general. You need to make it more

  specific.  In particular, you want to make sure that it does not match the coming of VPN traffic

  in to / out of the router.

  For example you should not really have one of these entries in your NAT translation table.

  HUB1 #sh ip nat translations
  Inside global internal local outside global local outdoor Pro
  ICMP 80.10.10.2:1 80.10.10.2:1 100.10.10.2:1 100.10.10.2:1
  ICMP 80.10.10.2:2 80.10.10.2:2 110.10.10.2:2 110.10.10.2:2
  UDP 80.10.10.2:4500 80.10.10.2:4500 110.10.10.2:4500 110.10.10.2:4500

  Instead use:

  Nat extended IP access list
  deny ip any 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255 connect
  allow an ip
  deny ip any any newspaper

  If you can use:

  Nat extended IP access list
  deny ip 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255 192.168.0.0 0.0.255.255 connect
  IP 192.168.0.0 allow 0.0.255.255 everything
  deny ip any any newspaper

  Also, I would be very careful with the help of the "log" keyword in an ACL, NAT.

  I saw problems.

  What are the IOS versions do you use?

  Try to make changes to the NAT so that you no longer see the entries of translation NAT

  for packages of NAT - T (UDP 4500) in the table of translation NAT on the hub. It may be

  This puts a flag on the package structure, that IOS Firewall and NAT is

  pick up on and then do the wrong thing in this case.

  If this does not work then let me know.

  Maybe it's something for which you will need to open a TAC case so that we can

  This debug directly on your installation.

  Mike.

• Internet in

  Hello

  I want to configure my cisco 1242ag ap (autonomous) series to work as internet gateway.

  How can I connect it to the network so that it works as the internet gateway for users.

  OK Cool... So, you have AP autonomous and connected to a switch that can get out to the internet now? Am I wrong? and you don't need any LWAPP now... Just the Autonomou?

  Concerning

  Surendra