IOM approval workflow

Similar Questions

• Approval workflow when you disable a user - IOM

  Hello
  
  I want to set up an approval workflow when you disable a user via a Wizard of the application. Can someone let me know how?. Thanks in advance.

  Simply create a trust for this resource and make a determination of the process rule as Action query is Revoke

  And attach this rule with your resources. It should work.

• Where should create user information be in the approval workflow?

  I have created an approval workflow that is patterned after the Oracle DefaultOperationalApproval with JDeveloper 11.1.1.7.0 example.  I am able to see the information of the applicant and request model information.  This is the xml code that I can see from Enterprise Manager (11.1.1.7.0).

  "< ns2:processxmlns:ns2="http://xmlns.oracle.com/ApprovalApp/AlliantOperationalApproval/ApprovalProcess"'xmlns="http://xmlns.oracle.com/request/RequestDetails">

  < IdDemande > 240 < / RequestID >

  < RequestModel > Creating user < / RequestModel >

  < RequestTarget / >

  < RequesterDetails >

  < FirstName / >

  < MiddleName / >

  < name > Simon < / LastName >

  < login > AJ. SIMON< / Login >

  < DisplayName > Simon < / DisplayName >

  < ManagerLogin / >

  < NomOrganisation > Combining < / OrganizationName >

  < email / >

  < StartDate / >

  < EndDate / >

  < status > Assets < / status >

  < XellerateType > For the end user < / XellerateType >

  < UserType > Consultant < / UserType >

  < role > All USERS < / role >

  < / RequesterDetails >

  < BeneficiaryDetails >

  < DisplayName > No < / DisplayName >

  < / BeneficiaryDetails >

  < ObjectDetails >

  < attributes / >

  < / ObjectDetails >

  < url >

  http://Oracle.vagrantup.com:14000/workflowservice/CallbackService

  < / url >

  < OtherDetails / >

  < / ns2:process >

  
  

  In researching this issue, I see that the BeneficiaryDetails has no new information of the user depending on this issue.

  Beneficiaries details forthcoming as null in SOA Composite custom - Create User

  
  

  Where should I see the Dataset in the payload? I guess I may have some incorrect mappings?  I need to find the UserType and new user name and other information.

  
  

  Thank you

  
  

  Tom
  
  

  
  

  If you go here in the Oracle assets: http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/middleware/id-mgmt/overview/oim-11g-assets-504842.html

  There is approval workflow and a 11.1.2.0 example.  It contains the final workflow that can be deployed.  You can take this as an example and information out of it for your authorization custom which may help to recover what are necessary.

  -Kevin

• Multi level in OIM 11 g R2 approval workflow

  Hello world

  I want to develop a two level approval workflow into OIM 11 g R2.

  When I intend to commissioning a resource or a payment, this workflow will run.

  This workflow is level two (approval of series)

  First approver is responsible for the user, second approver is a custom group.

  Is there an example of a workflow like this?

  How can I develop it?

  Thank you.

  Best regards.

  Here's the documentation of R2 for the creation of a new composite of soa:

  Development of Workflows for approval and commissioning Manual - 11g Release 2 (11.1.2.1.0)

  -Kevin

• I got 15 different approval workflow and I want to execute task climbing for

  Hai,
  I've had 15 different approval workflow and I want escalation for these approval workflow task. I want to ask a question here, once I run climbing task it will trigger all approval or approval work flow to 15 unique flow. #
  Kind regards
  Regnier

  http://docs.Oracle.com/CD/E14571_01/doc.1111/e14308/scheduler.htm

  Escalation of task - this scheduled task intensifies in anticipation of tasks whose escalation had elapsed at the time where the scheduled task was executed.

  Thus, during the execution of this task a glimpse, the task that must be raised based on your setup in the composite SOA fires. Workflow escalation of task awaiting will then be triggered. The rest of them will remain same wait their approval.

  Thank you
  VAMSi.

• Implementation of date deadline for the approval workflow step

  Hello! I'm trying to set up the deadline for a date of approval workflow. I was thinking of using tokens, so that the user/author enters at this date (using the calendar tool) the custom metadata field, and then this value token can be used in the custom script iDoc in the case of update of the step.
  
  Even if I found something similar in the documentation, I can't understand how to extract the date out of this custom field value:
  
  < parseDate (wfCurrentGet ("lastEntryTs")) $if < $ dateCurrent (-7) >
  DO SOMETHING
  < $endif$ >
  
  I guess that dateCurrent-(7) will have to use my value of token instead of the value (-7)? But how can I configure the token for the date (I know how to user) and how to get here?
  
  Thank you very much!

  It would not be a token, but just a reference to the field that contains the date value. Assuming that your custom date domain name is "xCustomDate", something like this should work:

  <$if parsedate="" (wfcurrentget="" ("lastentryts"))="">< parsedate(#active.xcustomdate)$="">
  DO SOMETHING
  <$endif$>

• Approval workflow - accounts payable

  If you set up "approval workflow" for orders, are there any types of payment / invoices that must not go for approval? What are and why?
  
  Also, is it possible in the database to see all the Bills that have been approved and by whom and invoices that have not been approved as they should be. what fields in the table / will show this?

  (1) PO approval and invoice approval is independent of the other. You must have in. invoice approval permissions are optional.
  (2) check ap_wfapproval_history_v and ap_inv_aprvl_hist_all

  Hope that answers your question,
  Sandeep Gandhi

• Difference between the approved &amp; approval workflow

  HII all,.
  
  What is the difference between approved & approval workflow?
  
  Appreciate your response

  This is the user guide for the planning:

  Approved: Occurs when the approval is selected. The administrator becomes the owner. Only
  the administrator can modify the data or perform an action on the approved planning units. After
  all the planning units are approved, the budgeting cycle is completed.

  Signed: Occurs when Sign Off is selected. Only the current owner or administrator can
  change the data or perform an action on the unit planning of which the State is approved. Property
  does not change when a planning unit is signed.

  Hope it clarifies your point.

  Concerning

• Question of FEAR (approval Workflow Engine)

  I try to implement AWE (approval Workflow Engine) and am having a little problem.
  
  I followed the instructions on the red paper related AWE of application. I have the following code. When this code is triggered, the cross reference table is filled. However, the table PSWORKFLOW does not get filled. The orinator has a supervisor selected in the workflow of its user profile tab. But nothing is routed to the user for approval. As I said the PSWORKLIST folder does not get filled up when this code is triggered. I'm trying to follow the code of EProcurment but wonder if it's a problem of configuration or coding. Any help is greatly appreciated. Thank you!!
  
  & reqRecord = CreateRecord (Record.CUS_VCHR_AW_VW);
  GetLevel0() (1). GetRecord (Record.VOUCHER). CopyFieldsTo(&reqRecord);
  
  & launchMgr = create PTAF_CORE:LaunchManager("VOUCHER",_&reqRecord,_"");
  & launchMgr.requester = "TEST";
  
  / * & launchMgr.appDef.trace_flag = True; */
  
  launchMgr.SetHeader (& reqRecord);
  & launchMgr.DoSubmit ();

  What version of PeopleTools do you use? I use PT 8.49, and my LaunchManager constructor looks like this:

  create a PTAF_CORE:LaunchManager(&PROCESS_ID,_&headerRec,_%OperatorId)_;)

  I think % OperatorId in my constructor is identical to your & launchMgr.requester = 'TEST '. If this is the case, the TEST user exist and have a supervisor?

  I noticed that you have trace flag commented. What do you get when you use the trace flag? You can write the trace to a file in the case of SavePostChange using code like this:

  / * vectorization options * /.
  Local file & trace = GetFile ("/tmp/awe_trace.txt", "A", "A", % FilePath_Absolute);
  & trace. WriteLine (& launchManager .appDef .trace);
  & trace. Close();

  Of course, this assumes that your launchManager brought component. The trace file will provide the step, step, path and information approvingly. If it fails on any one of these objects, you can see the failure in the trace file.

  What your Process definition, path and step criteria? You can set these "Always true" If you only have a definition, path and step.

• IOM 9.1.0.1 selection of approval workflow

  Hello
  
  I need help on how to configure rules for the determination of the process for IOM 9.1.0.1
  
  I have two processes of approval and the shape of the object (it requires an approval and the two other approvals). I would like to be able to decide, during execution, what approval process should be triggered using the rules of determination of processes based on the shape of object data.
  
  I created two rules for determining process as follows:
  
  Rule1:
  Type: Determination of the process
  Subtype: approval
  Re: Name of the resource
  Process: Name approval process 1
  Rule: Name of the field in the shape of the object is equal to true
  
  Rule 2:
  Type: Determination of the process
  Subtype: approval
  Re: Name of the resource
  Process: Name approval process 2
  Rule: Name of the field in the shape of the object is equal to false
  
  The problem I have is that IOM seems to ignore these rules. I think it might be related to the fact that I am unable to leave the two approval process with the field 'by default the process' unchecked. If I try to uncheck and save, it gets checked again.
  
  
  According to me, I'm missing something here, and I can't find any documentation on how to configure rules of decision-making, in official documentation or Metalink.
  
  Advice would be appreciated.
  
  Thank you

  Once you create these rules, go to the resource object. There is a tab for the process. Add your rules here. Then it checks these rules and determine which exploit to use.

  -Kevin

• IOM 11.1.2.3 approval Workflow rule

  Hello

  I have deployed a composite Server IOM but am unable to establish a rule to it. Get a blank screen as attached. This isn't a browser issue as the same works fine in our other communities.

  Guidance as to what could be wrong.

  The SOA server is running.

  I think that yours is a new installation and not to upgrade.

  Please take a backup before performing the steps below.

  I recommend you make a backup of the DB of the IOM repository and data-jazn file - sysadmin.xml before making changes so that you can return if necessary.

  1 update UPGRADE_MDS_MERGE set MDS_CHECKSUMVALUE = null where MDS_FILENAME = ' jazn-data - sysadmin.xml'

  2. restart the IOM

  3. There will be a new jazn-data - sysadmin.xml inserted at UPGRADE_MDS_MERGE. Just delete the jazn-data - sysadmin.xml, whose MDS_CHECKSUMVALUE is null.

  delete from UPGRADE_MDS_MERGE where MDS_CHECKSUMVALUE is null

  Try it and tell us the result. Workaround has worked for our environment.

• No emails sent by the IOM approval process

  Hello

  We have a problem with the mail notifications sent from the element of human task of a BPEL workflow approval in OIM 11 g R2 (SOA 11 g R1):

  On one of our circles of IOM, no approval notification is sent at all, even if they are correctly configured in the element of human task corresponds to the composite SOA. Notifications are sent correctly on another installation of the IOM that uses exactly the same composite.

  There is no trace of the IOM and SOA even try to send these messages, that they appear at all in the "State of the Message page" of the section of the mail Service of the Enterprise Manager user (not even in a "failed" State).

  We already checked:

  • AdminServer, SOAServer, OIMServer and area newspapers (they show no unusual)
  • The composites themselves (identical on both facilities)
  • The configuration of email from UMS driver (identical on both facilities)
  • The JpsContextName in the SDPMessagingServerConfig MBean and jps-config. XML (identical on both facilities)

  What are we missing that could be the cause of this problem?

  Thank you very much!

  Configure you the messaging part and turn notifications on the server SOA?

  In enterprise manager, right-click of your soa server instance, under Administration of SOA, select properties of Notification Workflow.  From there set the Notification Mode and the emails below.

  -Kevin

• At the attribute level approval workflow

  Hello
  can someone guide me how to get the approval at the attribute level workflow.
  IOM 9.1.0.1/2 supports the workflow for updating free profile but is not at the attribute level, & I need an approach
  to achieve this workflow at the attribute level.
  Thank you
  Rahul Shah

  It's for things OOTB (Self Modification profile).

• The seller approval workflow error

  Hello

  I tried (unsuccessfully so far) activate the standard workflow for the approval of the seller (say: VendorApproval)

  However, when I try to change a provider (which triggered the workflow) I get the following message is displayed:

  op Fiatteringsproces (ID = VendorApproval, issues-ID = ApproveVendors, ingangsdatum 2007-01-01, thread-ID 32) (18081,1056): 1:1, number of step 1 (18081,1058) EOAW_CORE. ENGINE. DefStepInst.OnExecute name: activate PCPC:8036 statement: 114
  Called from: EOAW_CORE. ENGINE. Name: launch of PathInst.OnExecute statement: 68
  Called from: EOAW_CORE. ENGINE. StageInst.OnExecute Name: InnerLaunch statement: 206
  Called from: EOAW_CORE. ENGINE. Name: launch of StageInst.OnExecute statement: 224
  Called from: EOAW_CORE. ENGINE. AppInst.O

  Aan said bericht wordt een uitzondering gehecht er een stapeltracering kan being alone.

  The last sentence is something like: an exception is added to the message this stacktracing may occur (or have held).

  Any ideas on that?

  What I've done so far:

  -Add a line in PS_EOAW_IDS to: VNDR_AF_XREF (since there is no line

  Thank you for reading!

  After some poking around more, the error was caused by a user. After the user has been deleted from the list (list of users is based on a query using a specific role), the workflow has worked properly.

• Approval workflow does not work

  Hello world.

  I've set up a workflow in OIM 11 g r2.

  I can deployed and saved successfully.

  When an End user (A) apply, application automatically assigns request approver (B) successfully according to the details of the request.

  But when I connect to IDM as request approver (B), I do not have this application on approvals pending.

  Is there any work that I need to run?

  Is there a role any (example: approver role) I need to assign to the approver role?

  What do you think of this problem?

  Thank you.

  Best regards.

  Does anyone have an idea?

  Application of details said assignee = role aaprover (B).

  When I login as role aaprover (B), there is no this request for the approval of the Pendig.

  What should I do?

  or

  What is my fault?

  Thank you.

  Best regards.