IP address to a specific port

Similar Questions

• LRT224 Port forwarding of specific Port

  Is it possible with this router to do port forwarding on a specific port to a pc?

  I have a basic need:

  Transfer the incoming request to WAN port 37777 to RDP port 3389 to the local server xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx.

  I try to do a formward configured like this:

  Service: 37777 (custom)-37777

  IP address: XXX.XXX.XXX.XXX:3389

  But I can't save this configuration (wghite page is displayed).

  How can I access with RDP on my public IP address on a specific (not the standard 3389), the port of my business and be sent to a specific server?

  for example: RDP at yyy.yyy.yyy.yyy:37777 connects to the server local xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx

  So far, I can only access this server with rdp standard port on the public ip address.

  Thank you

  The LRT224 supports the translation of address of Port (PAT). With PAT, each computer on the LAN is translated at the same IP address, but with a different port number assignment.

• By the way a specific port number

  Hell-o,

  My question is about the PIX515e. We have a Server Windows ISA firewall we want to retire. I need to move the ports that have been opened in this area of ISA for the PIX. On AIS, he simply says "send and receive port tcp 5510' for example. Is it possible on the PIX of this port is very simply to apply. Without having to create a static entry? A way to simply open a specific port number?

  Suggestions, ideas or advice greatly welcome,

  TIA,

  Gary

  Which starts the connection, the interface of high security to low or low security interface to high? If she is brought down, do nothing, it will allow by default. If it is low to high, you must 1) of static type and 2) an access list. The acl is not reference IPs, but it should (security reasons - the whole point of the PIX). For example:

  (1) static (inside, outside) subnet to the 10.10.10.10 x.x.x.x 255.255.255.255 mask (or use a range of IP addresses)

  or

  static (inside, outside) 10.10.10.10 10.10.10.10 (if nat disabled)

  and

  (2) access list 102 permit tcp any any eq 5510

  or

  access list 102 permit tcp any host x.x.x.x eq 5510 (better)

  or

  access-list 102 permit tcp host y.y.y.y host x.x.x.x eq 5510 (best)

  Access-group 102 in external interface

  It will be useful.

  Steve

• Network ACL two specific ports

  As I know there is no way to set ACLs for network such that only two specific ports are available. I'm using Oracle 11 g 2.
  
  I would like a HTTP and SMTP port opened for local loop address. These are ports 7777 and 25. It is my understanding that you can have only one of the ACL for each host. While it seems that you can create others, any additional ACL for the same host does not always work as expected. So does anyone have tips that how can I do this? I'd rather not have all ports between 7777 and 25 available but this is what I currently have...
  
  DBMS_NETWORK_ACL_ADMIN. (ASSIGN_ACL)
  ACL = > 'local_loopback.xml '.
  , host = > "127.0.0.1"
  lower_port = > 25
  upper_port = > 7777
  );

  Captain Egg wrote:
  As I know there is no way to set ACLs for network such that only two specific ports are available. I'm using Oracle 11 g 2.

  Not the case in my experience. An ACL can be for a specific purpose, but contain multiple ports for this purpose.

  For example I assign ports 80, 8080, 7777 and some others, in a single web - acl.xml, to a target of network (host or domain).

  Read the usage notes in the PL/SQL package of database, Oracle®, and reference Types.

• Application of force to use specific ports

  Hi all
  I have an application that uses random ports.  This could be good behind a typical personal router, but is not possible with the current implementation.  The program is an application of video conferencing with Polycom collaboration, and the app is telepresence m100.
  The release notes for m100 indicate a few random ports are used for some protocols.  (See page 21)  Our network firewall device requires a game port assignment and our security protocols do not allow an open machine.  We would also like to use this m100 of telepresence on multiple machines, so a DMZ is not an option.  The application does not allow the user to select specific ports.  Request support with Polycom has been less then helpful (answer: it uses a random port).

  So here I wonder if there is a way on XP or 7 to force an application to use ports or range of ports, perhaps 4-5 assigned ports, not 65535.  The nature of the beast requires several ports open, not one.  Also, remote machines will have the same configs, so one of these machines could initiate/receive calls with all the others.

  John

  Questions of this nature are better asked on Technet

  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/categories/

• How to create and assign a VLAN to specific ports

  In our ISA550W, create the VLANS for different subnets and assigning them to specific ports are a piece of cake and self explanitory.

  However on a SG300-10MP, I am totally lost lol. I just want to make ports 7 & 8 set to a sous-reseau.10 instead of un.6 as the rest of the switch. I need these ports to be totally independent from the rest and not to communicate with others at all.

  How can I do this?

  Thank you!

  Hi Alex,

  Under management of VLANS, go into settings of the interface.  Change the interfaces that you use to access the ports by choosing the way you want by clicking on change.

  Once they are access ports back to Port for page VLAN and assign the port desired as one not marked in this interface.

  This should be everything you need, let me know if you have any other questions.

  -Good Trent

  * Please note the useful messages! **

• PIX Site to Site VPN to aid to specific port

  Good day to all!

  I know that to have establish a site to site VPN using 2 PIX firewall, it should be noted the interesting traffic on both sides. Usually, we make the following statement:

  accessList AllowedTraffic ip 192.168.2.1 allow 192.168.3.1

  But I thought what happens if specify us specific ports on the

  The ACL that is used for interesting VPN as HTTPS traffic? Like the one below:

  Acccess-list AllowedTraffic tcp 192.168.2.1 192.168.3.1 eq 443

  Comments would be nice...

  Thank you...

  Chris

  Here are my configs when I tested it. I hope this helps! If Yes, please rate.

  Thank you

• How to restrict multicast traffic to specific ports on GS716Tv3?

  I can not find specific instructions to limit traffic of multicast on the smart switch GS715Tv3.

  I need to force all multicast traffic to travel on a specific set of interfaces, or at least stay within a given virtual LAN on the switch to which it is native. All the changes you want multicast servers and listeners will be on these interfaces in their separate vLAN.

  We have several GS715Tv3 switches configured identically, but multicast traffic does not pass between the switches.

  Topology:

  Eight GS716Tv3 smart switches, each configured with three VLANS identical.

  No traffic should pass between these VLANS on the switch or pass between the switches

  In other words, even if all the 8 switches each have a vLAN named "IOSubsystem", I do not considered the same vLAN.

  .

  vLAN 4 is corresponding to the hosts of Linux to address major

  vLAN 5 is for the audio subsystem

  vLAN 6 is for the IO subsystem

  VLAN each switch 4 has two active ports, a session to the external interface of the main Linux host and the other to a central switch of 9th GS716Tv3 where a system of software development is also linked.

  VLAN each 5 switch connects to the components of the audio subsystems (not shown).

  VLAN each switch 6 has two active ports, a going inward a lead Linux host interface and one for the IO subsystem.

             -> [vLAN4 | g10]---> [Switch #9]-+.
  
             -> [vLAN4 | g9]-> [Linux host #1: eth0]                 |
  
  [Switch #1]-> [vLAN6: g1]-> [Linux host #1 | eth1]                 |
  
             -> [vLAN6: g2]-> [e/s 1 subsystem]                   |
  
                                                                |
  
             -> [vLAN4 | g10]---> [Switch #9]- +---> [software Dev host]
  
             -> [vLAN4 | g9]-> [Linux host #2: eth0]                 |
  
  [Switch #2]-> [vLAN6: g1]-> [Linux host #2 | eth1]                 |
  
             -> [vLAN6: g2]-> [subsystem/o 2]                   |
  
  ...                                                           ~
  
                                                                |
  
             -> [vLAN4 | g10]---> [Switch #9]-+.
  
             -> [vLAN4 | g9]-> [Linux host #8: eth0]
  
  [Switch #8]-> [vLAN6: g1]-> [Linux host #8 | eth1]
  
             -> [vLAN6: g2]-> [i/o subsystem #8]

  We get multicast traffic unwanted between each of these systems, causing corruption of our stream. We limit the multicast traffic on vLAN6 of each switch to stay on the vLAN6 of this specific switch.

  Thanks for any help.

  To switch the management VLAN to 4.

  Make sure you have 2-way switch, one in VLAN4 in a VLAN1.

  4 and apply the value of the system you use to a static IP address to the switch and confirm the access to the web configuration and then change "management VLAN ID. then pass the system that you use on the port or any VLAN 4, then you should have access, otherwise, wait about 60-90sec and try again, because you might have PLEASE and it will block anything on the port for just under its set to "Enabled" 'Fast Link '.

  Then under "IP Configuration" value switches other IP address in IP range of VLAN4.

  For the love of Simplisicty, unmarked ports should never be in 1 VLAN simultaneously.

  And instead of using the point and click, goto "Port PVID Configuration" and just create the VLAN it.

  Member of the PVID and VLAN the same thing for a port, on what VLAN, it must be in the database

  And to confirm, you have a cable from switch to each VLAN? You can cut down on cables and ports if you tag/trunk ports to the next switch. then all VLAN 3 just 1 cable between each pair of switches, saving you at least 4 ports on each switch.

  Just an example of my GS724T (ignore ports g8 and g-19-20, their current PVID is because of something else you do not, LACP and Span/Monitoring):

  All ports are configured to a single VLAN, my 'LAN hand' is VLAN12, that the management VLAN is set for, g23-24 ports VLAN trunks, they are set on tagg VLAN12 and 14 when the traffic is out of these ports, then switch to the other side reads the consequence tagg and acts, that way I don't need 2 cables/port for each of them.

  

• Warn if there is no communication on a specific Port

  Hello

  I'm looking for a solution monitor network traffic coming from specific IP address and Port 192.168.1.1:80 for example. If there is no packets transferred on Port 80 in the last 15 minutes the NMS should generate an alert.

  Is this possible with Foglight NMS?

  I thought about the flow of network traffic, which monitors traffic. But did not find any alerts that can be generated.

  Or any other tool that can help me with this problem?

  THX

  Hello

  This feature is currently unavailable. You can control whether a port is open or closed. You can also set an alert if traffic is zero in a period of time, but it will be evaluated for always guarded port.

  Best regards

  Jonas

• Address static IP or Port forward?

  I have a Linksys WRT54G Router for my wireless network. On my local network, not to mention that my laptop and printer, I have a weather station - Davis VantagePro2 with WeatherLinkIP. This is connected to the router via an ethernet cable and connected to the software on laptop via wireless network.

  Currently, everything is set to work Auto Config - DHCP and does well on the wireless. However, occasionally, the router randomly assigns a new IP address to the weather station, and I lose my connection, thus losing the weather data.

  When I find out, I can find what IP address it has now affected, go into the software of the weather on my laptop that downloads (wireless) the info and the new IP address, then everything works fine - until the next time. Some time its months, sometimes its days, before that router reassigns the IP address.

  The software must be manually set to the IP address and port # in order to receive data. # Port is currently set to 22222.

  In order to maintain a continuous connection, it would be an instance to use the port range forward, rather than a static IP address? If so, are there instructions somwhere to guide me through this?

  I don't know why it changes the IP address. Maybe the router restarts in silence and then later does not know the old lease. Maybe the weather station does not it is the current IP address during renewal and the result is another. Or the weather station does not renew IP address but begins with a discovery.

  You can't set a static IP address for your weather station on the router. If the weather station does not do so it is impossible with your WRT54G. Only the latest models of Linksys have a function called "DHCP Reservation", which would be what you need.

  So, if you can not set it to station weather you can't do with the WRT...

• Direct specific ports down a VPN L2L

  I have a client who is trying to use an ISP hosted web filtering and content management a gateway, the ISP wants to use and L2L ISPEC VPN on site at their front door to control the traffic. Today we have the tunnel with an ACL test for peripheral test side customer down the tunnel, but that it blocks all traffic that is not being analyzed. The problem is that they are on an ASA 5510 with 8.2.2. You cannot add ports tcp in the ACL sheep, it error when you try to apply the nat 0 access-list statement sheep (inside). We can define the ports to go down the VPN traffic interesting ACL with number, but there is no way to send just the web ports down the VPN and allow the other ports on regular overflow interface NAT I was look in 8.4 and see if it allows a policy NAT (twice the NAT for virtual private networks) to set a port to a range of IPS (IE (: nat static destination WEBINSPECT-WEBINSPECT (indoor, outdoor) static source a whole) but who only define as web ports.

  I do not have an ASA test to use, but I guess that vpn l2l will be only by IP and I can not define a port tunnel.

  In any case, it is a strange, but the ideas are welcome. I don't think it's possible, but I thought I'd see if anyone encountered at the front.

  Hello

  Well to give you a simple example where we use the double NAT / manual transmission NAT to handle traffic

  For example a configuration example I just did on my 8.4 (5) ASA

  The following configuration will

  • Set the 'object' that contains the source network for NAT
  • Set the 'object' that contains the service for NAT
  • Define the real NAT

  The real NAT is going to make any connection from the network under 'Wireless' network object to the destination port TCP/80 will be sent 'WAN' interface without NAT

  Of course it is the next step with VPN L2L network under 'network wireless of the object' would correspond to the ACL of VPN L2L. But that seemed straight forward for you already

  the subject wireless network

  10.0.255.0 subnet 255.255.255.0

  service object WWW

  Service tcp destination eq www

  NAT (WLAN, WAN) static source without WIRE WIRELESS WWW WWW service

  The following configuration will

  • Define the "object-group", that defines networks of the source of the rule by default PAT for Internet traffic
  • Set the 'object' for the PAT address (could just use 'interface' instead of the 'object')
  • Define the real NAT

  The NAT configuration will just make a rule by default PAT for the wireless network. The key thing to note here is that we use the setting "auto after." This basically inserts the NAT rule to the priority of the very bottom of the ASA.

  object-group, network WIRELESS-network

  object-network 10.0.255.0 255.255.255.0

  network of the PAT object - 1.1.1.1

  host 1.1.1.1

  NAT (WLAN, WAN) after the automatic termination of wireless - NETWORK PAT dynamic source - 1.1.1.1

  Now we can use the command "packet - trace" to confirm that the NAT works as expected.

  WWW TEST-TRAFFIC

  ASA (config) # packet - trace 12355 1.2.3.4 entry WLAN tcp 10.0.255.100 80

  Phase: 1

  Type: UN - NAT

  Subtype: static

  Result: ALLOW

  Config:

  NAT (WLAN, WAN) static source without WIRE WIRELESS WWW WWW service

  Additional information:

  NAT divert on the output WAN interface

  Untranslate 1.2.3.4/80 to 1.2.3.4/80

  Phase: 2

  Type: IP-OPTIONS

  Subtype:

  Result: ALLOW

  Config:

  Additional information:

  Phase: 3

  Type: NAT

  Subtype:

  Result: ALLOW

  Config:

  NAT (WLAN, WAN) static source without WIRE WIRELESS WWW WWW service

  Additional information:

  Definition of static 10.0.255.100/12355 to 10.0.255.100/12355

  Phase: 4

  Type: HOST-LIMIT

  Subtype:

  Result: ALLOW

  Config:

  Additional information:

  Phase: 5

  Type: NAT

  Subtype: rpf check

  Result: ALLOW

  Config:

  NAT (WLAN, WAN) static source without WIRE WIRELESS WWW WWW service

  Additional information:

  Phase: 6

  Type: USER-STATISTICS

  Subtype: user-statistics

  Result: ALLOW

  Config:

  Additional information:

  Phase: 7

  Type: IP-OPTIONS

  Subtype:

  Result: ALLOW

  Config:

  Additional information:

  Phase: 8

  Type: USER-STATISTICS

  Subtype: user-statistics

  Result: ALLOW

  Config:

  Additional information:

  Phase: 9

  Type: CREATING STREAMS

  Subtype:

  Result: ALLOW

  Config:

  Additional information:

  New workflow created with the 1727146 id, package sent to the next module

  Result:

  input interface: WLAN

  entry status: to the top

  entry-line-status: to the top

  the output interface: WAN

  the status of the output: to the top

  output-line-status: to the top

  Action: allow

  TEST FTP - TRAFFIC

  ASA (config) # packet - trace entry tcp 10.0.255.100 WLAN 12355 1.2.3.4 21

  Phase: 1

  Type:-ROUTE SEARCH

  Subtype: entry

  Result: ALLOW

  Config:

  Additional information:

  in 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 WAN

  Phase: 2

  Type: IP-OPTIONS

  Subtype:

  Result: ALLOW

  Config:

  Additional information:

  Phase: 3

  Type: INSPECT

  Subtype: inspect-ftp

  Result: ALLOW

  Config:

  class-map inspection_default

  match default-inspection-traffic

  Policy-map global_policy

  class inspection_default

  inspect the ftp

  global service-policy global_policy

  Additional information:

  Phase: 4

  Type: NAT

  Subtype:

  Result: ALLOW

  Config:

  NAT (WLAN, WAN) after the automatic termination of wireless - NETWORK PAT dynamic source - 1.1.1.1

  Additional information:

  Definition of dynamic 10.0.255.100/12355 to 1.1.1.1/12355

  Phase: 5

  Type: HOST-LIMIT

  Subtype:

  Result: ALLOW

  Config:

  Additional information:

  Phase: 6

  Type: NAT

  Subtype: rpf check

  Result: ALLOW

  Config:

  NAT (WLAN, WAN) after the automatic termination of wireless - NETWORK PAT dynamic source - 1.1.1.1

  Additional information:

  Phase: 7

  Type: USER-STATISTICS

  Subtype: user-statistics

  Result: ALLOW

  Config:

  Additional information:

  Phase: 8

  Type: IP-OPTIONS

  Subtype:

  Result: ALLOW

  Config:

  Additional information:

  Phase: 9

  Type: USER-STATISTICS

  Subtype: user-statistics

  Result: ALLOW

  Config:

  Additional information:

  Phase: 10

  Type: CREATING STREAMS

  Subtype:

  Result: ALLOW

  Config:

  Additional information:

  New workflow created with the 1727154 id, package sent to the next module

  Result:

  input interface: WLAN

  entry status: to the top

  entry-line-status: to the top

  the output interface: WAN

  the status of the output: to the top

  output-line-status: to the top

  Action: allow

  As you can see traffic TCP/80 corresponds to rule on the other. And the FTP used for example corresponds to rule by default PAT as expected.

  If you want to know a little more about the new NAT 8.3 format + you can check a document I created

  https://supportforums.Cisco.com/docs/doc-31116

  Hope this helps you, please mark it as answered in the affirmative or rate of answer.

  Naturally ask more if necessary

  -Jouni

• Question - Win7 Home Prem... seeking to block a port. Recently, network multiple attacks of DoS.Generic.SYNFlood go a single specific port. Anyone know how to block a port?

  Recently, several attempted network using DoS.Generic.SYNFlood attacks.  All attacks are trying to come across 40 Port.  How can I block this port?  I checked the registry of Port number and 40 is unassigned... exactly why they use it.  Can anyone help?

  How can I block this port?

  http://www.sciencehq.com/infos/how-to-block-ports-in-Windows-7.html

• Listening to a specific port

  I have an application that listens on the port, say, 9000.

  I want to send data to the application through this office port which is connected to the device

  via USB.

  Is this possible? How can I do?

  A successful!

  THX

• Logitech Z205 speakers capture a specific Port

  All the usb ports worked end before connection of the Logitech Z205 speakers to the usb port. Now only one port will be only play speakers and NOTHING ELSE shows as connected or work, all other ports work well regardless of what is connected. It's as if this port has become CAPTIVE/EXCLUSIVE Z205 speakers.

  Any suggestions reveal welcome.

  Hi Collport,

  Thanks for choosing Microsoft Community!

  Thank you for the information.

  Unfortunately, this seems the only solution now.

  Before you continue, see the following:

  Important: this section, method, or task contains steps that tell you how to modify the registry. However, serious problems can occur if you modify the registry incorrectly. Therefore, make sure that you proceed with caution. For added protection, back up the registry before you edit it. Then you can restore the registry if a problem occurs. For more information about how to back up and restore the registry, click on the number below to view the article in the Microsoft Knowledge Base:

  Back up the registry:

  Don't answer if you need additional assistance, we will be happy to help you.

• How can I hold the public IP address on a specific profile on the asa 5510

  Hi guys

  How can I hold the public IP address on my session NAT VPN cisco customer for no one else can use it? I have a cisco ASA 5510

  the Interior is 172.10.20.86

  public 166.245.192.90

  Need to call my ISP?

  Thank you

  Sorry to say but your qustion is not very clear. Can you please post what you are trying to achieve?

  Thank you

  Ajay