IPS IDM-HTTPS

Similar Questions

• Check the IPS and HTTPS

  Hello

  Cisco IPS/AIP module identify the HTTPS tunnel torrent traffic?

  IPS can inspect the https traffic to detect any anomaly?

  Kind regards.

  Hello

  In my humble OPINION by default, you cannot inspect all encrypted traffic.

  You need to have traffic ended on the SAA to decipher and then send to the client.

  HTH

  Parasmo

• Question about IPS signature updates.

  I installed ASA5510 (with AIP10) on our customer site. But I can't find out how to upgrade the IPS signature. Automatic update is possible? i.e. through CCE id.

  Our client is not MC IDS. What should we do? Let me know, please.

  Without MC there are no automatic updates directly from CEC. However, you can configure a local server (SSH or FTP) and copy packages to update signature for this EAC server. Then, you can run a manual upgrade of IDM (https://1.2.3.4) or the CLI (session in the ASA SSM card) or set up a schedule of automatic upgrade that will modernize the sensor on the local server periodically. To configure the auto updates, IDM would be the easiest to use. If you want to do a manual upgrade here is an example for the CLI:

  session # 1

  # conf t

  # ssh host 1.2.3.4

  # upgrade scp:[email protected]/ * ///home/user/upgrades/ IPS-sig-S192-minreq-5.0-1.pkg

• Module of IPS ASA 5505 Cisco ASA-SSC-AIP-5 Auto Update

  Automatic update no longer work after November 14, 2014

  Cisco Intrusion Prevention System, Version 5,0000 E4, SSC-AIP-5

  Error: automatic update has selected a package ([https:[email protected] / * *///swc/esd/11/273556262/guest/IPS-sig-S838-req-E4.pkg) to the cisco.com Locator service, however, the package download failed: the host is not approved. Add TLS certificates approved of the host system.

  Automatic update can work without problem until November 14, 2014.

  I've added welcomes guests of tls trust

  # tls trust-facilitators
  72.163.4.161
  72.163.7.60

  Always faced with the same question

  Understand the Signature Update feature works automatic Cisco IPS

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/security/IPS-sensor-software-version-71/113674-IPS-automatic-signature-update-00.html

  SPI uses the file transfer

  protocol defined in the file download data learned in the server manifest URL (currently using HTTP

  TCP (80)).

  The problem I see is that earlier before 14 nov it fetch the file signature with HTTP (works fine)

  but now, he's trying with HTTPS instead.

  A single session against 72.163.4.161 (have always been the HTTPS)

  A single session against 72.163.7.60, previous HTTP now it uses the HTTPS protocol

  Does anyone have a solution?

  fix.

  the problem with the location service should be set right now and you can continue to use the auto-update http

• IPS a bad use of port 80

  What signature intercepts the abusive use of port 80?

  Check HTTP engine functionality allows users to detect and prohibit HTTP connections? including tunneling through port 80, unauthorized request methods and non-HTTP compatible file transfers.

  This gives the best idea for IOS-based IPS

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/ps6350/products_configuration_guide_chapter09186a0080455acb.html

  -Hoogen

  Note If this post may help :)

• ASDM-IDM demo intrusion prevention

  Hello

  I was counting on the use of the demo under the student for security CCNP rather than buy any equipment. However, when I use it it came not with the module or the options, I see in the book. Is there something that I am missing? Did anyone knows anyway to get a demo version of IPS or any other free stuff, I use to simulate it? I don't really use ID so don't have no equipment to work don't really want to buy modules for a review only. Hemlock version of demo and ASDM is 6.4 (9).

  Thank you

  Hello Stephen,

  I use ASDM-IDM launcher v1.5 (56) for the same purpose and I can't open the demo for IPS IDM.

  When I open the launceher, I check the box "run in demo Mode" and select version like Setup 7.1 (1) as "Intrusion_Prevention" then it works the way you want.

  Hope this helps

  -----
  Mercury Alshboul

• Single command to set "CapturePacket True" on all transmissions?

  Is there a single command to set "CapturePacket True" on all transmissions? Or I have to create a script to copy and paste that tells the ID to capture the packets for each signature one by one?

  Thank you!

  Jim

  If you ran IPS v5, via IDM (https protocol and the sensor directly), you would be able to signatures 'select all' and enable "verbose alert" which is the 5.x equivalent of "packet capture" in a single action for all signatures.

  Via IDM in 4.x (which judging from your question that you are running) - No, can't do it. I forget if there is a way through IDSMC (part of the VMS package) to do this, though - I seem to remember that it is not.

• JOINT-2 update in progress...

  Hi all

  I'm new to this community and in Cisco security. Here's my question for you:

  I have a Cisco 7600 router with a JOINT-2 module and I update it to version IPS - K9 - 5.1 - 8 - E3. Now, I would like to upgrade with the IPS 7.0 version (3) E4.

  Is this possible? I read that IPS 6.0 denies default high risk event and create an event of action to solve the problem. How can I solve my problem? I'm afraid to do something wrong because the router is an important, if I do something wrong I'm afraid to block all traffic: s

  Thank you

  G.

  G;

  You can certainly upgrade your JOINT-2 8,0000 E3 to E4 4,0000 directly.

  Regarding your concern about the JOINT-2 refusing events at high risk (risk rating of 90 to 100) by default, this is the case if the JOINT-2 is configured to inspect the traffic using the line operation.  If the JOINT-2 is configured for the inspection of the promicuous, this will not happen.

  If your JOINT-2 is configured for online operation, the simplest method to avoid the JOINT-2 denying high risk events, is to turn off th default event action override (EAO).  Starting in IPS (IDM) Device Manager:

  Configuration > policies

  Highlight the virtual sensor in question (degfault is vs0) and choose Edit.

  Under the event rule Action uncheck "use event Action overrides.

  This will disable all replacements actin of event for the virtual sensor in question.  You can also disable just the high-risk EAO, following the same procedure as above, but instead of uncheck 'use event Action overrides' by default:

  Highlight the EAO 'HIGH risk' and click 'change '.

  Next to the "right Packet Inline (online)", uncheck the box under the column "Enable" (not the "Assigned" column).

  Scott

• Oracle Virtual Directory for SSL configuration

  Hello experts, can you please help me understand whether a typing error in Oracle Enterprise Deployment guide for IDM http://docs.oracle.com/cd/E25054_01/fusionapps.1111/e21032/toc.htm#BEGIN, port of the OID is mentioned in Oracle Virtual Directory for SSL configuration - section 9.4.2.2. Why port ODI?
  
  The guide mentioned how to configure OID for SSL in section 7.4.3.2 and here he mentioned port 389 OID! For example, during Setup for OVD, is not that we are supposed to talk about port OVD. Please help me clarify this confusion. BTW, in many places, the guide says clearly, if you have OVD, you mention port OVD here...
  
  Thank you
  Jyothi

  Specify the port OVD. I think that by default it's 6502.

  Kind regards
  GP

• IPS-4240-K9 IDM number 6.2 control events

  Hello world

  I noticed a tangled because of edge idm monitoring events. It does not show alerts, I noticed on the page of welcome home/netwrok security health sensor cyrcle. During the last 5 minutes sensor shows, for example, 10 red alerts, but when I switch on the dashboard of events - there is nothing on this table...

  Several days ago, I saw some periodic alerts on 4003 signature - nmap udp scan. Happening in the course of the week, and I think that quaintity of alerts real tine on the sensor cyrcle of health and on the table of events were the same.

  only that I now note 3041 signature and a few times errorMessage:-store event wrapped autour [IdsEventStore::writeEvent (), index As Integer = 19531] name = errWarning

  I read a few notes about this error, but do not understand what what do I change to display real-time alerts and signature 4003 (when idm is working properly, that it has been the main attack). confoguration virtually all of the default values. IPS works in promiscious mode

  Thanks for any help and advice

  Regarding the message "'errorMessage:-the event rolled around store" "

  The events are stored in a circular buffer. Once the buffer is full, we simply would crush the oldest event. If you see several of these messages, it means that the number of events is really high. You can set frequency of alerts > summary Mode for signatures that shoot a lot.

  Check out the following link to configure the summary Mode:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/sw/secursw/ps2113/products_tech_note09186a0080838bcf.shtml#IDM

  Kind regards

  Sawan Gupta

• IPS detects SQL Injection on HTTPS

  Hello

  Do you think Cisco IPS is able to detect the SQL Injection via HTTPS?

  "In some situations, it may be possible to detect and prevent SQL injection attacks by using a system of prevention of intrusion (IPS). For an IPS to be effective, it must have visibility into the application traffic. "For applications that use encryption end-to-end with HTTPS (for example, applications that use the HTTPS protocol without termination or of the acceleration to an intermediate network device), an IPS can not identify the traffic with the characteristics of a SQL injection attack." by:

  Understanding SQL Injection

• Trouble passing traffic HTTP w / IPS enabled on the Multilink Interface

  Scenario:

  I have a 2811 using 2 bonded T1s to the Internet (using MLPPP). Before I glued the T1s and used the interface serial0 to access the net, I used the following instructions on my public interface without any problems;

  IP - ips myips in

  IP - inspect myfw in

  After that I stuck the T1s and removed the above statements interface series and placed on them my multilink interface panel, everything has stopped working (i.e. my home DNS, Web sites), but a remote user could ping the internal Web sites. When I removed the statements above of traffic Panel multilink interface flowed very well, but I had no security. I have included my config. Someone at - it guidance? I also tried to use 'ip check out myfw' on fa0/0 to see if it would work better and I got the same results, no access to my web servers from the outside world. Once I removed the statement, however, everything was perfect.

  Hello

  I suggest a slight modification using ACLs that you have configured upward at the present time.

  remove orders group-access 101 the multilink first and then remove the 101 ACL with no access list 101.

  Once you are done with this pls paste the below mentioned lines of configuration on your router...

  access list 101 tcp refuse any any eq 4444

  access list 101 deny udp any how any eq 4444

  access-list 101 deny udp any any eq tftp

  access list 101 deny udp any how any eq 593

  access list 101 tcp refuse any any eq 1025

  access list 101 tcp refuse any any eq 1029

  access list 101 tcp refuse any any eq 7789

  access list 101 deny udp any how any eq 1025

  access list 101 deny udp any how any eq 1029

  access list 101 deny udp any how any eq 7789

  access list 101 tcp refuse any any eq 135

  access list 101 tcp refuse any any eq 136

  access list 101 tcp refuse any any eq 137

  access list 101 tcp refuse any any eq 139

  access list 101 deny udp any how any eq 135

  access list 101 deny udp any what all 136 eq

  access-list 101 deny udp any any eq netbios-ns

  access-list 101 deny udp any any eq netbios-ss

  access list 101 ip allow a whole

  At the present time, you permit a whole in the middle and start to deny everything again.

  This should not be the case that the ACLs are get processed.

  regds

• The user max reached via https (IPS 4260)

  If I try to connect https written this user max reached. Reset did not help.  May need to remove a few signatures and the inspection complete-100 configured interface?

  

  

  Mike-

  I see that you run signature and version 7.0 (4) output 601.

  It is a bad combination and can cause your sensor to lock up. You will need to upgrade your operating system to 7.0 (6), and then apply the latest pack of Signature (you have 30 days after the expiration of this license, so hurry).

  This may solve your problem, but even if this is not you should do this in any case.

  Here's the thread discussing the problem of version of the operating system/GIS:

  https://supportforums.Cisco.com/thread/2109620?TSTART=0

  -Bob

• Upgrade version of CISCO IPS signature

  Hi guys:

  Anyone know the process for updating the signature on a CISCO IPS version, I want to do it manually. If somedoy can tell me the orders and all I have to do this.

  Concerning

  Luis;

  Updats manual signature for Cisco IPS sensors can be performed from the CLI as shown here:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/IPS/7.0/Configuration/Guide/CLI/cli_system_images.html#wp1142504

  Or from the interface of the IDM as shown here:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/IPS/7.0/Configuration/Guide/IDM/idm_sensor_management.html#wp2126670

  This process is also used to upgrade software base of the probe.

  Scott

• Failure of the IPS

  Hi all

  I am facing a problem when the IPS fails the entire network behind it is not not accessible.

  so, how can I check capacity of box two

  1-material bridging.

  2-software workaround.

  As far as I know, there is no HW diversion on the 4500. But you can use the software of derivation:

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/TD/docs/security/IPS/7-2/configuration/guide/IDM/idmguide72/idm_interfaces.html#pgfId-1169786