Is supported PPTP vpn cisco ASA 5520 firewall?

Similar Questions

• VPN Cisco ASA 5520

  Hello, my name is Jeremy Rose, I am a novice...

  I'm trying to set up a VPN in a private network to access a server from outside of our firewall.

  The VPN functions, however, we are unable to contact the server once the VPN is in place.

  I can provide more information, as requested, any ladies or gentlemen reccomendations?

  Thank you

  Jeremy

  Ensure that valuable traffic corresponds to both ends basically.  So if your server is 192.168.1.10 and changed to 10.1.1.10 you must update under the card encryption ACL.

• What VPN work as a PPTP vpn firewall CISCO-ASA-5520.

  Hi all

  Can you please tell me which replace the VPN I can configure PPTP on ASA 5520 firewall. What VPN work as a PPTP vpn firewall CISCO-ASA-5520.

  You can use the wizard VPN of RA with ASDM and confiugre L2TP IPSEC VPN that does not need a VPN Client must be installed.

  Michael

  Please note all useful posts

• Routing with Cisco ASA 5520 VPN

  I have installed IPsec vpn remote users in the Cisco ASA 5520 using RADIUS in my main network. Works very well. I have a site to my Cisco ASA5520 tunnels going to other sites, some of the tunnels have Cisco ASA and some have SonicWalls. I wish that my users VPN remote IPSec to be able to navigate in these tunnels is a site to access remote subnets attached to these tunnels. Do I need to use a combination of routing and the ACL? Or can I just use ACL only? Or just use routing only?

  Thank you

  Carlos

  Hello

  The key to set up here is the two ACL of VPN L2L end points that determine the 'interesting' traffic to connect VPN L2L. You will also need to confirm that the connection of the VPN Client is configured so that traffic to the remote sites have sent to the connection of the VPN client. There are also other things that you should check on your ASA plant

  Here most of the things you usually have to confirm

  • Set up 'permit same-security-traffic intra-interface' if it is already present in your configuration
    • This setting will allow connections to form between the hosts that are connected to the same interface on the ASA. In this case, applies because the VPN client users are connected to the interface 'outside' of the ASA and also remote sites are connected to the ASA to "external". If the traffic between the remote VPN Client and VPN L2L sites will be to enter and exit the same interface
  • You will need to check how the customer if configured VPN connection. Split or full Tunnel tunnel
    • If the connection of the VPN Client is configured as Split Tunnel then you need to add all the networks from the remote to the Split Tunnel, so that the connections between the VPN Client is transmitted to the ASA and from there connections VPN L2L
    • If the connection of the VPN Client is configured as full Tunnel, then there no problem that all traffic is transferred to the Client VPN connection all its assets
  • Define the VPN pool in the ACL of VPN L2L
    • You should make sure that the pool network VPN Client is defined in the ACL that define 'interesting' traffic to connect VPN L2L. So, you need to add the pool VPN VPN L2L configurations on the sites of Central America and remote control
  • Configure NAT0 / NAT exempt for remote VPN Client to L2L VPN Site traffic at both ends of the VPN L2L
    • You must ensure that the NAT0 / exempt NAT rules exist for the VPN Client for Remote Site traffic. This will have to be configured on the SAA "outside" interface. Format of configuration varies naturally a bit on the ASA Central his software level.

  These should be the most common things to set up and confirm for traffic to flow between the VPN Client and Remote Sites

  Hope this helps please rate if yes or ask more if necessary.

  -Jouni

• IPSec vpn cisco asa and acs 5.1

  We have configured authentication ipsec vpn cisco asa acs 5.1:

  Here is the config in cisco vpn 5580:

  standard access list acltest allow 10.10.30.0 255.255.255.0

  RADIUS protocol AAA-server Gserver

  AAA-server host 10.1.8.10 Gserver (inside)

  Cisco key

  AAA-server host 10.1.8.11 Gserver (inside)

  Cisco key

  internal group gpTest strategy

  gpTest group policy attributes

  Protocol-tunnel-VPN IPSec

  Split-tunnel-policy tunnelspecified

  value of Split-tunnel-network-list acltest

  type tunnel-group test remote access

  tunnel-group test general attributes

  address localpool pool

  Group Policy - by default-gpTest

  authentication-server-group LOCAL Gserver

  authorization-server-group Gserver

  accounting-server-group Gserver

  IPSec-attributes of tunnel-group test

  pre-shared-key cisco123

  GBA, we config user group: VPN users. all VPN users in this group. ACS can visit his political profile: If the user in the 'VPN users' group, access ACS.

  When we connect from a VPN Client to the server, all users connect to success. When you see the parser in ACS journal, each user success connect also get

  error:

  22040 wrong password or invalid shared secret

  (pls see picture to attach it)

  the system still works, but I don't know why, we get the error log.

  Thanks for any help you can provide!

  Duyen

  Hello Duyen,

  I think I've narrowed the issue. When remote access VPN using RADIUS authentication we must keep in mind that authentication and authorization are included on the same package.

  Depending on your configuration, the ACS is defined as a server RADIUS (Gserver Protocol radius aaa server) and becomes the VPN Tunnel authenticated and 'authorized' on this server group:

  authentication-server-group LOCAL Gserver

  authorization-server-group Gserver

  As noted above, the RADIUS of request/response includes authentication and authorization on the same package. This seems to be a problem of incorrect configuration that we should not set up the 'permission' in the Tunnel of the group.

  Please remove the authorization under the Tunnel of Group:

  No authorization-server-group Gserver

  Please test the connection again and check the logs of the ACS. At this point there are only sucessful newspaper reported on the side of the ACS.

  Is 'Permission-server-group' LDAP permission when authenticating to a LDAP server so to retrieve the attributes of permission on the server. RAY doesn't have the command as explained above.

  I hope this helps.

  Kind regards.

• Order of operations NAT on Site to Site VPN Cisco ASA

  Hello

  I have a question about the order of operations NAT on Site to Site VPN Cisco ASA 8.2.x. I have a scenario where the internal IP address of the range 10.17.128.x are NATTED IP public 31.10.10.x. below is the config:

  Tunnel normally passes traffic to dmz - 31.10.11.10, 31.10.11.11 servers.

  But the servers NATTED (10.17.128.x <->31.10.10.x) does not work.

  inside_map crypto 50 card value transform-set ESP-3DES-SHA

  tunnel-group 100.1.1.1 type ipsec-l2l

  tunnel-group 100.1.1.1 General-attributes

  Group Policy - by default-PHX_HK

  IPSec-attributes tunnel-group 100.1.1.1

  pre-shared key *.

  internal PHX_HK group policy

  PHX_HK group policy attributes

  VPN-filter no

  Protocol-tunnel-VPN IPSec svc webvpn

  card crypto inside_map 50 match address outside_cryptomap_50

  peer set card crypto inside_map 50 100.1.1.1

  inside_map crypto 50 card value transform-set ESP-3DES-SHA

  inside_map crypto 50 card value reverse-road

  the PHX_Local object-group network

  host of the object-Network 31.10.11.10

  host of the object-Network 31.10.11.11

  host of the object-Network 31.10.10.10

  host of the object-Network 31.10.10.11

  host of the object-Network 31.10.10.12

  host of the object-Network 31.10.10.13

  host of the object-Network 10.17.128.20

  host of the object-Network 10.17.128.21

  host of the object-Network 10.17.128.22

  host of the object-Network 10.17.128.23

  the HK_Remote object-group network

  host of the object-Network 102.1.1.10

  inside_nat0_outbound list extended access permitted ip object-group PHX_Local-group of objects HK_Remote

  ACL_INSIDE list extended access permitted ip object-group PHX_Local-group of objects HK_Remote

  ACL_OUTSIDE list extended access permitted ip object-group HK_Remote-group of objects PHX_Local

  outside_cryptomap_50 list extended access permitted ip object-group PHX_Local-group of objects HK_Remote

  Route outside 102.1.1.10 255.255.255.255 30.1.1.1 1

  public static 31.10.10.10 (Interior, exterior) 10.17.128.20 netmask 255.255.255.255

  public static 31.10.10.11 (Interior, exterior) 10.17.128.21 netmask 255.255.255.255

  public static 31.10.10.12 (Interior, exterior) 10.17.128.22 netmask 255.255.255.255

  public static 31.10.10.13 (Interior, exterior) 10.17.128.23 netmask 255.255.255.255

  He started to work when I did another group of object by name PHX_Local1 and added to the list of access inside_nat0_outbound, instead of the object group PHX_Local, as below:

  the PHX_Local1 object-group network

  host of the object-Network 31.10.10.10

  host of the object-Network 31.10.10.11

  host of the object-Network 31.10.10.12

  host of the object-Network 31.10.10.13

  No inside_nat0_outbound access list extended only to allowed ip object-group PHX_Local-group of objects HK_Remote

  inside_nat0_outbound list extended access permitted ip object-group PHX_Local1-group of objects HK_Remote

  Can you please help me understand why group object PHX_Local failed with access-list inside_nat0_outbound, but he began to work with the Group of objects PHX_Local1.

  Also, if you could tell me the order of operations to NAT via VPN Site to Site, it would be useful.

  Thank you

  Kind regards

  Thomas

  Hello

  I think you could have said the original question in a way that could be missleading. In other words, if I understand now.

  From what I understand now, you have the DMZ set up the server that are measured with a public IP address on the real servers. And for those that you have configured NAT0.

  Then you have other servers that do not have public IP addresses themselves, but they are translated on the SAA.

  If this is the case, then the next question would be. The server with the NAT should attend the L2L VPN connection with their real IP or address IP NAT.

  Of course if you configure static NAT for the same servers and NAT0 the NAT0 will always win.

  You have these guests who were not able to use the VPN L2L

  31.10.10.10 10.17.128.20

  31.10.10.11 10.17.128.21

  31.10.10.12 10.17.128.22

  31.10.10.13 10.17.128.23

  IF you want them to go to the VPN L2L with their original IP address then you must configure

  object-group, LAN

  host of the object-Network 10.17.128.20

  host of the object-Network 10.17.128.21

  host of the object-Network 10.17.128.22

  host of the object-Network 10.17.128.23

  object-group, REMOTE network

  host of the object-Network 102.1.1.10

  inside_nat0_outbound list extended access allowed ip-group of objects LOCAL object-group remote

  outside_cryptomap_50 list extended access allowed ip-group of objects LOCAL object-group remote

  IF you want to use the L2L VPN with the public IP address, then you must configure

  object-group, LAN

  host of the object-Network 31.10.10.10

  host of the object-Network 31.10.10.11

  host of the object-Network 31.10.10.12

  host of the object-Network 31.10.10.13

  object-group, REMOTE network

  host of the object-Network 102.1.1.10

  outside_cryptomap_50 list extended access allowed ip-group of objects LOCAL object-group remote

  EDIT: in this case you naturally do not configure any NAT0 for actual IP addresses we want precisely the IP addresses to be visible to the L2L VPN with the IP NAT address.

  Or you can of course use the same "object-group" as currently but change the content in an appropriate manner

  Be sure to mark it as answered if it was answered.

  Ask more if necessary

  -Jouni

• IPSec VPN to asa 5520

  Hello

  First I must admit that I am not very versed in Cisco equipment or in general IPSEC connections so my apologies if I'm doing something really good obviously stupid, but I checked through any kind of things that I could find on the internet on the configuration of IPSEC VPN.

  The setup I have is an asa 5520 (o/s 8.2) firewall which, for now, is connected to a temporary connection beautiful style home broadband for testing purposes. The netopia router is configured to allow ipsec passthrough and redirect 62515 UDP, TCP 10000, 4500 UDP, UDP 500 ports in the asa 5520.

  I'm trying to connein out of a laptop with disabled windows firewall and vpn cisco 5.0.02.0090 client version.

  I ran several attempts through the ipsec configuration wizard options. most of the time that nothing comes in the newspaper to show that a connection was attempted, but there is a way I can set up product options the following on the firewall log:

  4. Sep 24 2010 | 13: 54:29 | 713903 | Group = VPNtest9, IP = 86.44.x.x, error: cannot delete PeerTblEntry

  5: Sep 24 2010 | 13: 54:29 | 713902 | Group = VPNtest9, IP = 86.44.x.x, drop table homologous counterpart does not, no match!

  6. Sep 24 2010 | 13: 54:21 | 713905 | Group VPNtest9, IP = 86.44.x.x, P1 = relay msg sent to AM WSF

  3: Sep 24 2010 | 13: 54:21 | 713201 | Group = VPNtest9, IP = 86.44.x.x, double-Phase 1 detected package. Retransmit the last packet.

  6. Sep 24 2010 | 13: 54:16 | 713905 | Group VPNtest9, IP = 86.44.x.x, P1 = relay msg sent to AM WSF

  3: Sep 24 2010 | 13: 54:16 | 713201 | Group = VPNtest9, IP = 86.44.x.x, double-Phase 1 detected package. Retransmit the last packet.

  6. Sep 24 2010 | 13: 54:11 | 713905 | Group VPNtest9, IP = 86.44.x.x, P1 = relay msg sent to AM WSF

  3: Sep 24 2010 | 13: 54:11 | 713201 | Group = VPNtest9, IP = 86.44.x.x, double-Phase 1 detected package. Retransmit the last packet.

  3: Sep 24 2010 | 13: 54:06 | 713257 | 1 failure to phase: incompatibility of types of attributes of class Group Description: RRs would be: Group 2 FCMS would: Group 1

  3: Sep 24 2010 | 13: 54:06 | 713257 | 1 failure to phase: incompatibility of types of attributes of class Group Description: RRs would be: Group 2 FCMS would: Group 1

  3: Sep 24 2010 | 13: 54:06 | 713257 | 1 failure to phase: incompatibility of types of attributes of class Group Description: RRs would be: Group 2 FCMS would: Group 1

  3: Sep 24 2010 | 13: 54:06 | 713257 | 1 failure to phase: incompatibility of types of attributes of class Group Description: RRs would be: Group 2 FCMS would: Group 1

  3: Sep 24 2010 | 13: 54:06 | 713257 | 1 failure to phase: incompatibility of types of attributes of class Group Description: RRs would be: Group 2 FCMS would: Group 1

  3: Sep 24 2010 | 13: 54:06 | 713257 | 1 failure to phase: incompatibility of types of attributes of class Group Description: RRs would be: Group 2 FCMS would: Group 1

  3: Sep 24 2010 | 13: 54:06 | 713257 | 1 failure to phase: incompatibility of types of attributes of class Group Description: RRs would be: Group 2 FCMS would: Group 1

  3: Sep 24 2010 | 13: 54:06 | 713257 | 1 failure to phase: incompatibility of types of attributes of class Group Description: RRs would be: Group 2 FCMS would: Group 1

  3: Sep 24 2010 | 13: 54:06 | 713257 | 1 failure to phase: incompatibility of types of attributes of class Group Description: RRs would be: Group 2 FCMS would: Group 1

  3: Sep 24 2010 | 13: 54:06 | 713257 | 1 failure to phase: incompatibility of types of attributes of class Group Description: RRs would be: Group 2 FCMS would: Group 1

  6. Sep 24 2010 | 13: 54:06 | 302015 | 86.44.x.x | 51905 | 192.168.0.27 | 500 | Built UDP inbound connection 7487 for Internet:86.44.x.x/51905 (86.44.x.x/51905) at identity:192.168.0.27/500 (192.168.0.27/500)

  and this, in the journal of customer:

  Cisco Systems VPN Client Version 5.0.02.0090

  Copyright (C) 1998-2007 Cisco Systems, Inc.. All rights reserved.

  Customer type: Windows, Windows NT

  Running: 5.1.2600 Service Pack 3

  24 13:54:08.250 24/09/10 Sev = Info/4 CM / 0 x 63100002

  Start the login process

  25 13:54:08.265 24/09/10 Sev = Info/4 CM / 0 x 63100004

  Establish a secure connection

  26 13:54:08.265 24/09/10 Sev = Info/4 CM / 0 x 63100024

  Attempt to connect with the server "213.94.x.x".

  27 13:54:08.437 24/09/10 Sev = Info/6 IKE/0x6300003B

  Attempts to establish a connection with 213.94.x.x.

  28 13:54:08.437 24/09/10 Sev = Info/4 IKE / 0 x 63000013

  SEND to > ISAKMP OAK AG (SA, KE, NO, ID, VID (Xauth), VID (dpd), VID (Frag), VID(Nat-T), VID (Unity)) at 213.94.x.x

  29 13:54:08.484 24/09/10 Sev = Info/4 IPSEC / 0 x 63700008

  IPSec driver started successfully

  30 13:54:08.484 24/09/10 Sev = Info/4 IPSEC / 0 x 63700014

  Remove all keys

  31 13:54:13.484 24/09/10 Sev = Info/4 IKE / 0 x 63000021

  Retransmit the last package!

  32 13:54:13.484 24/09/10 Sev = Info/4 IKE / 0 x 63000013

  SEND to > ISAKMP OAK AG (Retransmission) to 213.94.x.x

  33 13:54:18.484 24/09/10 Sev = Info/4 IKE / 0 x 63000021

  Retransmit the last package!

  34 13:54:18.484 24/09/10 Sev = Info/4 IKE / 0 x 63000013

  SEND to > ISAKMP OAK AG (Retransmission) to 213.94.x.x

  35 13:54:23.484 24/09/10 Sev = Info/4 IKE / 0 x 63000021

  Retransmit the last package!

  36 13:54:23.484 24/09/10 Sev = Info/4 IKE / 0 x 63000013

  SEND to > ISAKMP OAK AG (Retransmission) to 213.94.x.x

  37 13:54:28.484 24/09/10 Sev = Info/4 IKE / 0 x 63000017

  Marking of IKE SA delete (I_Cookie = 36C50ACCE984B0B0 R_Cookie = 0000000000000000) reason = DEL_REASON_PEER_NOT_RESPONDING

  38 13:54:28.984 24/09/10 Sev = Info/4 IKE/0x6300004B

  IKE negotiation to throw HIS (I_Cookie = 36C50ACCE984B0B0 R_Cookie = 0000000000000000) reason = DEL_REASON_PEER_NOT_RESPONDING

  39 13:54:28.984 24/09/10 Sev = Info/4 CM / 0 x 63100014

  Could not establish the Phase 1 SA with the server '213.94.x.x' due to the 'DEL_REASON_PEER_NOT_RESPONDING '.

  40 13:54:28.984 24/09/10 Sev = Info/5 CM / 0 x 63100025

  Initializing CVPNDrv

  41 13:54:28.984 24/09/10 Sev = Info/6 CM / 0 x 63100046

  Set indicator established tunnel to register to 0.

  42 13:54:28.984 24/09/10 Sev = Info/4 IKE / 0 x 63000001

  Signal received IKE to complete the VPN connection

  43 13:54:29.187 24/09/10 Sev = Info/4 IPSEC / 0 x 63700014

  Remove all keys

  44 13:54:29.187 24/09/10 Sev = Info/4 IPSEC / 0 x 63700014

  Remove all keys

  45 13:54:29.187 24/09/10 Sev = Info/4 IPSEC / 0 x 63700014

  Remove all keys

  46 13:54:29.187 24/09/10 Sev = Info/4 IPSEC/0x6370000A

  IPSec driver successfully stopped

  I have connectivity full http from the internet to a machine inside the asa 5520 so I think that the static routing and NAT'ing should be ok, but I am pleased to provide you with all the details.

  Can you see what I'm doing wrong?

  Thank you

  Sam

  Pls add the following policy:

  crypto ISAKMP policy 10

  preshared authentication

  the Encryption

  md5 hash

  Group 2

  You can also run debug on the ASA:

  debugging cry isa

  debugging ipsec cry

  and retrieve debug output after trying to connect.

• RV082 VPN Cisco ASA

  I have seen discussions on people who make reliable VPN connections to a RV082 at a remote site to a Cisco ASA 5500 security series device in a Home Office.  Can we get a FAQ/document displays the settings on both sides so that it works?  Even if mark you it as "This is a configuration not supported, use at your own discretion", it would be better than nothing.  Each Cisco, Linksys device or otherwise, must be able to communicate with other devices, especially on a standard IPSec protocols.

  Please see attached tech note on the definition of the tunnel VPN RVxx Linksys with Cisco

• enabling remote vpn Cisco asa

  Dear team,

  I have a Cisco asa firewall, I would enable remote vpn (ssl vpn or customer).

  Please check the joint view version and suggest which are missing or need to enable them.

  Therefore, I will obtain concrete results and enable VPN.

  concerning

  SecIT

  With the license and the software version you have, you can only run the existing IPsec VPN client.

  To run AnyConnect SSL VPN client-based, you must acquire a license AnyConnect Essentials. For your platform that would be L-ASA-AC-E -5550=. (Clientless SSL VPN would be a different reference number.)

  I also suggest upgrading your system beyond 8.2 software (2) the current recommended release would be 9.0 (3). (9.1 (5) is the last on the 5550.)

• Remote access VPN Cisco ASA

  Hello!

  I have 9.1 (3) version of Cisco ASA with remote access VPN set UP on the outside interface. When the user connects to the Internet on the outside interface, it works well. My goal is to allow the connection of all other interfaces (inside the dmz and etc.) to the outside interface. Cisco ASA allows to do? Order to packet - trace output is less to:

  MSK-hq-fw1 # packet - trace entry inside tcp 10.10.10.1 14214 1.1.1.2 443

  Phase: 1

  Type:-ROUTE SEARCH

  Subtype: entry

  Result: ALLOW

  Config:

  Additional information:

  developed 1.1.1.2 255.255.255.255 identity

  Phase: 2

  Type:-ROUTE SEARCH

  Subtype: entry

  Result: ALLOW

  Config:

  Additional information:

  developed 1.1.1.2 255.255.255.255 identity

  Result:

  input interface: inside

  entry status: to the top

  entry-line-status: to the top

  the output interface: NP identity Ifc

  the status of the output: to the top

  output-line-status: to the top

  Action: drop

  Drop-reason: (headwall) No. road to host

  Hello

  Well, you can of course turn VPN on other interfaces, but to be honest, I never even tried to set up the VPN it otherwise than of multiple multiple external interfaces in the case of the ISP and in this case only for testing purposes.

  Some things related to the ASA are well known but not well documented.

  The official document that I can remember: this is the following (which only refers to this limitation regarding the ICMP)

  Note 
  For  security purposes the security appliance does not support far-end  interface ping, that is pinging the IP address of the outside interface  from the inside network.
  

  Source (old configuration guide):

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/TD/docs/security/ASA/asa71/configuration/guide/conf_gd/trouble.html#wp1059645

  -Jouni

• PPTP VPN Cisco IOS router through

  Hi all

  I was wondering if there is a trick to get PPTP to work through a Cisco router.  He was in fact at some point, but I don't remember what has been changed over time... However, it no longer works.

  Current configuration includes:

  * CBAC applied inbound and outbound on the Internet interface (I needed to add incoming to fix a problem with the mode passive FTP doesn't work is not on a FTP server hosted behind this router)

  * CBAC inspects, among other things, PPTP

  * ACL applied inbound on interface Internet, GRE and TCP 1723 admitted any intellectual property

  * No other ACL on the router

  * IOS 15.0 (1)

  * Inbound configuration NAT for TCP 1723 (currently using the WAN IP address)

  One thing I saw was so Troubleshooting "IKE Dispatcher: IKEv2 version detected 2, Dropping package! - but I think that it is a wrong journal (router as the Cisco VPN configuration example).

  The server is definitely okay - we are able to connect over PPTP VPN from the local network to the server.  So I think it's a sort of NAT problem, because I don't see anything dropped by the firewall.

  Anyone able to point me in the right direction?

  Thank you

  Hello

  Thanks for fix the "sh run". Could you change the following:

  IP nat inside source static tcp 10.77.99.11 1723 1723 road-map repeating sheep ccc.ccc.ccc.ccc

  to do this:

  IP nat inside source static tcp 10.77.99.11 1723 1723 extensible ccc.ccc.ccc.ccc

  It would be prudent to proceed with this change in the removal of the map of the route if no one connects to the server via the PPTP VPN.

  Let me know.

  Kind regards

  ANU

  P.S. Please mark this question as answered if it was resolved. Note the useful messages. Thank you!

• Upgrade to Cisco ASA 5520 8.2.5 to 9.1.7

  Hello

  I have an upgrade tonight for a customer to upgrade a StandAlone ASA 5520 in version 8.2.5 in 9.1.7. I have the same upgrade week next to the same client for a failover pair.

  I already have this kind of process of 8.2.x upgrade to 9.1.x so I know the entire process, since I have to take a first step 8.2.5 8.4.6 then 9.1.7. In addition this customer has no statement of Nat therefore normally an easy process.

  But today during my routine to prepare for the upgrade (I prefer to make a double or triple check before) I found this bug:

  https://BST.cloudapps.Cisco.com/bugsearch/bug/CSCuh19234;JSESSIONID=0A69...

  This bug is fixed in version 8.4.7, and 8.4.6.99. But it is not recommended by the upgrade process for a 8.2.5 to 8.4.7 jump and I can not find the 8.4.6.99 version.

  I don't want to have any problems during my upgrade with something I can avoid.

  As I said I already have this updated in the past without any problem and with a more complex configuration.

  Has anyone as a return to this process for the last months? Should I do an extra step? (before first 8.2.5 to 8.4.5 8.4.6 or 8.4.7)

  Thank you in advance for your answer.

  There are a few incidents reported for ASA 5520 8.2.5 hit this defect running.

  You can go for an extra for 8.4.x upgrade as you mentioned to avoid default we can't say for sure if you will encounter this situation or not.  8.4.6.99 can be a picture of development so be unavailable unless you want to call TAC and confirm or obtain any other image in 8.4.x train.
  Maybe add another upgrade code can't hurt as that hit the bug.

  Kind regards
  Dinesh Moudgil

  PS Please rate helpful messages.

• Divide access remote vpn tunnel ASA 5520

  Hello

  I'm setting up a vpn for remote access with split tunnel, but I use an acl extended to match a host and http to destination port, but does not work.

  Scenario of

  Distance access(10.0.0.122/24)--internet---Cisco ASA(inside:192.168.10.1/24)---ip = 192.168.10.6 - C6509 - 10.0.0.254/24---hote = 10.0.0.31/24

  The plot is when I activate the IP service connection or flow ICMP worked. Does anyone have an idea what is the problem? Thank you

  Concerning

  Split tunneling does not take into account the port information you specify in the ACL, he doesn't care the ip address/network you defined.

  If you want to restrict access to ports and IP, you must define your split tunneling with only ip addresses and using a vpn-filter acl in group policy to restrict following the specific ports that you want:

  split_acl ip access list allow

  access-list allowed filter_acl ip eq

  attributes of group-pol

  Split-tunnel-pol tunnelspecified

  value of Split-tunnel-net split_acl

  VPN-filter value filter_acl

  -heather

• SSL VPN using ASA 5520 mode cluster - several problems

  I configured 2 ASA 5520 s in the load balancing cluster mode. I connect using anyconnect and I download the customer the first time and everything works well except outlook. I don't know why outlook does not work.

  The second problem is after the anyconnect client is installed on your machine, he remembers that ASA (say ASA2) he first connected and the GUI shows the address IP of ASA2 instead of the virtual IP address of the cluster. I want users always connect using the virtual IP address.

  The third problem I have is there is a default group of SSL VPN and I want all users to use this group. In the initial web page, there is a drop down menu which shows that this group, but I still want to disable this menu drop-down.

  Any suggestions?

  To disable the drop-down menu, you can turn it off with the command

  WebVPN

  no activation of tunnel-group-list

  This will take care of your last issue.

  ***************************

  You can create a profile of the Anyconnect client with the name of the server you want to connect with and that make the ASA that will solve your problem of virtual IP.

  **************************

  Regarding Outlook, do you use specific ports which allows inspection of the ASA. Take a look at the list of inspection on the SAA and perhaps try to disable inspection and see if it works.

  *****************************

• Clientless vpn cisco asa

  All,

  I use the cisco ASA 5500 vpn device, and I need a specific configuration where clients vpn (vpn without customer) would authenticate in an external radius server.

  My problem is that I need to do different bookmarks for different users, so how can I do if my clients are not in the local database? (I do not even have accounts configured on the cisco device), DAP would be the solution?

  TKS in advance

  You are absolutely right. You can configure DAP to make specific bookmarks according to which the user connects via the WebVPN (Clientless SSL VPN).