Is the 2950 a 64-bit platform?

Similar Questions

• The 32-bit platform has been abandoned for JDeveloper 12.1.3?

  This thread was created to prevent the diversion of this similar thread:

  https://community.Oracle.com/message/12509733#12509733 (when the new version of Jdeveloper will come including ADF mobile framework?)

  I have replied to this thread and inadvertently ask myself a question:

  always 32-bit will be supported?

  Timo Hahn replied as follows:
  

  If you check the matrix certification Oracle JDeveloper and ADF 12 c (12.1.3) supported systems , you see that only the windows 64-bit systems are supported. You can try the generic installation program that can run windows 32-bit inn.

  That is why this thread for my question.

  Certification for 12.1.3 matrix lists only the 64-bit systems. It is not clear if the support of 32-bit system only has not yet been made public or if Oracle has abandoned in favor of the 32-bit platform JDev framework and SDK extension.

  We have tried to create and manipulate Developer extensions sql for several years, but there have always been problems; in particular, the absence of sufficient documentation for changes between sql developer and framework Jdeveloper, he comes and the lack of any official source for XSD schema files necessary.

  The last issue was the transition to the new OSGI framework for these two products.

  Developer 4.0.2.15.21 SQL is supported on 32-bit Windows and use the Jdeveloper 12.1.3 framework which, until today, NOT went public.

  I posted a question in this forum and the developers forum sql on a problem of Extension when you use the JDev 12.1.2 and Sql Dev framework.

  https://community.Oracle.com/thread/3566788

  This code example, I provided in this thread appears to indicate the following:

  1. a bug in the version of sql developer 4.0.2.15.21

  2. a bug in Jdeveloper 12.1.3

  3. an incompatibility between this version of sql dev and the 12.1.2 Framework SDK extension my sample uses (since 12.1.3 was not available

  So I'll try to understand what JDeveloper and Sql Developer extensions will be cared for and on what platforms.

  If the Jdev 12.1.3 framework won't be supported for 32-bit, which probably means that extensions for 32-bit versions of Sql Developer will not be supported.

  But this version of Sql developer is publicly available for 32-bit systems and its architecture makes heavy use of the extensions. So he itsn can't clear at all whether the general public can develop extensions for 32-bit sql developer if Jdev 12.1.3 framework is not available on this target.

  One of the problems with the use of JDev to create Developer extensions sql was that developer sql was NOT available as a target platform for the deployment.

  I expect Oracle to announce a delivery date for a 32-bit version of the JDev framework. But since the 64-bit version was only published and that Sql Dev is supported on 32-bit platforms and uses a (perhaps in-house) version of the 12.1.3 framework I hope that Oracle could at least tell us if a decision was made to abandon support for the 32-bit framework or not.

  If this isn't the case, then the third party extensions won't be able to support the 64-bit versions of JDeveloper and Sql developer.

  Hello...

  We (JDev) support still 32-bit JDK. The change you see is double: 1) we distribute installers with the 32-bit JDK built, 2) we no longer run tests on 32-bit JDK. However, visitors are always entitled to support when executing JDeveloper in a 32-bit environment. The availability of 32-bit computers and operating systems capable of running JDeveloper fades quickly. Only 64-bit supports fusion Middleware, but for development only (JDeveloper) we continue currently to provide 32-bit support. This will ultimately change in the future (in the same way that we no longer support 16-bit architectures), but the time is not yet known.

  Also, I just want to point out that the support of 32-bit is mentioned in the doc certification here:

  Other operating systems

  Updated Oracle JDK 1.7 51 + (32 bit, 64 bit)

  Updated Oracle JDK 1.7 51 + (32 bit, 64 bit)

  and here

  Gets the support of other operating systems (untested), including 32-bit JDK, for the purposes of a single user in a development only environment. Not planned for production deployments.

  -Brian

• Patch # for the last startCD (12.1.1.13) for Linux 64-bit platform?

  Hello

  I try to install EBS 12.1.1 Oracle Linux 5.8 64 bit. When I started the "rapidwizard" I got following error:

  [root@prod rapidwiz] #. / rapidwiz

  
  Installation Wizard fast is to validate your file system...
  4 dvd found labels
  Quick Installation Wizard will now launch the Java Interface...

  [root@prod rapidwiz] # error: no 'customer' JVM to "/ mnt/hgfs/software_2/R12_64bit/startCD/Disk1/rapidwiz/jre/Linux_x64/1.6.0/lib/i386/client/libjvm.so".

  [root@prod rapidwiz] #.

  I checked and the file exists at this location. The I did some internet research and found this thread:

  https://community.Oracle.com/thread/2351367?TSTART=0

  It is said that I should install the most recent startCD/RapidWiz. I wonder if Patch # 11072566) is the same for 32-bit and 64 - bit? If not, what is the patch # for Linux 64-bit platform?

  I read he said 'Generic platform' - this means that it can be installed on any platform and 32-bit and 64-bit?

  Please advise!

  Best regards

  It is the same for 32-bit and 64-bit. 12.1.x release is a 32-bit application - and can be installed on the operating system 32-bit or 64-bit OS

  HTH
  Srini

• STANDBY.wrf error Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: C:\STAF\bin\JSTAF.dll: cannot load the .dll AMD 64-bit on a 32-bit IA platform

  Hello

  I created a single mosaic and get error below in the file standby0.wrf.

  As stated in the doc, I made a 32-bit windows to watch VM and installed 32-bit staf followed by staf configurations. I have installed all critical updates for windows.

  Exception in thread "main" java.lang.UnsatisfiedLinkError: C:\STAF\bin\JSTAF.dll: cannot load the .dll AMD 64-bit on a 32-bit IA platform

  	in java.lang.ClassLoader$ NativeLibrary.load (Native Method)
  	at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadLibrary0 (unknown Source)
  	at java.lang.ClassLoader.loadLibrary (unknown Source)
  	at java.lang.Runtime.loadLibrary0 (unknown Source)
  	the impossible (unknown Source)
  	to com.ibm.staf.STAFHandle. < clinit > (STAFHandle.java:306)
  	at IdleVMTest.main (IdleVMTest.java:30)

  
  

  I enclose my test log.

  Please let me know how to fix it.

  Thank you

  Suresh

  Hi Suresh,

  In fact, the first client does not generate wrf files. Customer of the tile, client0, generates the wrf files. The first customer runs the harness and brings together the results of each client in the results file.

  The program which ensures the pings is located on client0, and he struggles to leave because of the bad number of bit Java on client0. This program writes to standby0.wrf. Your VMS Eve is probably fine.

  Rebecca

• KB-2524375-64 bit update tries to install on a 32-bit platform

  original title: 64 bit update tries to install on a 32-bit platform

  I have a 32-bit XP system which is trying to pull down to a 64-bit XP update and of course do not install. The update is KB2524375. Any ideas on how to stop this. There is every time it refreshes tent and fails.

  1. Click Start, click run, type services.msc and click OK. Right-click automatic updates, and then click stop.  Minimize this window.
  2. Remove all content from the Windows distribution folder (C:\Windows\SoftwareDistribution)
  3. Open the services window, click automatic updatesand then click Start.
  4. Restart the computer.

• Windows Vista 64-bit platform - cannot download Windows Live Messenger

  original title: Windows Vista 64-bit platform

  I can't fownload Windows Live Messenger, until I am able to download the latest platform, which I was unable to do.  Can you help me?

  You will find support for Windows Live Messenger in these Windows Live help forums: http://windowslivehelp.com/forums.aspx?productid=2>

  UTC/GMT is 07:36 Tuesday, November 1, 2011

• Binary translation is incompatible with the long mode on this platform. Windows 7, processor intel core i5

  I install VMware Workstation 12.1.1 Player for Windows 64-bit operating systems on Lenovo intel core i5 Windows 7.

  I have a copy of VM for HP Quality Center with the VirXPSP3.vmx file and the environment.

  When I try to open the Workstation Player vmx file:

  (1) I got prompt that machine virtual seem to be an option to take possession and use

  2) after taking possession, I try to play the virtual machine, I got a prompt with "binary translation is incompatible with the long mode on this platform. Long mod will be disabled in the virtual environment and application requiring long mode does not work correctly as well. See http://vmware.com/info?id=152 for more details. »

  Link is on this page: system required to install an operating system 64-bit on a 32-bit host (1003945) client. VMware KB

  Host is definitely 64 so I'm puzzled with this is the case.

  (3) next step/guest is: "this virtual machine may have been moved or copied. I clicked on the button "I copied it".

  (4) the following message:

  Fatal error VMware Player: (mks)

  Exception 0xc0000005 (access violation) occurred.

  Log file is attached.

  Line 476 in the log file is:

  The following features of VT - x are necessary for the support of VT - x in VMware Player; However, these features are not available on this server:

  2016 06-07 T 13: 51:34.466 - 07:00 | VMX | I125: hostCpuFeatures = 0x217d

  In one of the previous installation, I did virtual Intel technology enabled in the BIOS after one of the responses of your forum. It has not removed the error.

  Just to clarify whenever I have uninstall I'm your site troubleshooting steps:

  (1) Uninstall using Add/Remove program of the program and features

  (2) run the installer with clean / change

  I do above steps as an administrator and restart after each step.

  On top I have delete the following folders:

  C:\Program Files (x 86) folder \Common Files\VMware

  File C:\ProgramData\VMware

  File C:\Users\Ivana\AppData\Local\VMware

  Files C:\Users\Ivana\AppData\Local\CrashDumps\vmware-vmx.exe.*.dmp

  File C:\Users\Ivana\AppData\Local\Temp\vmware-Ivana

  File C:\Users\Ivana\AppData\Roaming\VMware

  And delete the folder with the Virtual Machine for HP Quality Center.

  Do you know how can I fix a fatal error (mks)?

  The same installation works fine on HP with Windows 7, i.e. copy of VM for HP Quality Center is ok.

  Thanks in advance for your help.

  Usually, this is caused by outdated or incompatible graphics drivers on your host.  I expect that the latest drivers for your integrated Intel HD Graphics 4000 would be probably already delivered through Windows Update, however.  Could be interesting to see if there is an optional update in your Windows Update list to get a new graphics driver.

  Otherwise, you can try the problem by disabling 3D graphic acceleration: from the VM menu, select settings..., and then in the list of material , choose display.  Clear (uncheck) the box 3D graphic acceleration .

  I hope this helps!

  --

  Darius

• SQLDeveloper error 'could not load .dll AMD 64 bit on a 32-bit platform of AI.

  Hello
  
  I installed SQL Developer.
  It starts, but when I try to connect to the HR database I get the following error message:
  

  An error was encountered performing the requested operation:
  
  C:\oracleee\product\11.2.0\dbhome_1\BIN\ocijdbc11.dll: Can't load AMD 64-bit .dll on a IA 32-bit platform
  
  Vendor code 0

  Already, I have installed Oracle EE and have installed JDeveloper today. The two are running without any problem.
  SQLDeveloper, I downloaded initially without the JDK, but that has not worked, and read the many responses to other people who have had the same problem (something mscvr7.dll or something like), as by their exhortations, I downloaded the SQLDeveloper which includes the JDK, which is be 32-bit (there is no 64-bit with JDK SQL Developer bundled with it). I'm on W7 64-bit.
  
  Can someone help me out here? I don't have much of a clue when it comes to JDK.
  
  Thank you very much
  Jason

  I think the problem is that the 32-bit java jdk tries to load a DLL 64 bit from the windows directory.

  You must download and install the 64-bit SQLDeveloper and tell him to use the 64 bit JDK.

  Is maybe that you have only a JRE installed, in which case you will need to download and install a JDK.

  If you have problems to do this work, post them here and we can help you.

  A work-around may be to make sure that the option 'Use OIC/thickness pilot' in tools | Preferences | Database | Advance us unchecked. This way Developer SQL shouldn't need to go near the ocijdbc dll

• Not able to install Management Agent on the server no - WHO, different platform

  Hello
  
  I run 12.2 of the WHO on a Linux platform and must make a 64-bit Windows Server a target managed by getting the installed Management Agent.
  
  The Agent software for the server to Win 64-bit platform has been downloaded using the console auto update. However, I can't add the target host because it maintains have reported that I have selected a platform for which software Management Agent is not available on the WHO and I want to use the update auto etc.
  
  So, after that I downloaded the agent software for Windows 64-bit at WHO, using the self updated fucntion, in the list of the software updates Agent, I see:

  Downloaded  |  Microsoft Windows x64 (64-bit)  |  12.1.0.2.0  | Oracle  |  Agent Software ...

  and when has highlighted in the past, activities list it shows shares"available"and then "Download", both with the status of successful operation.
  
  So now, I'm going to: Setup - Add Target - add targets - manually add hosts
  I add an entry, fill in the IP address and choice of platform (win 64-bit), but the platform name is added with * "Unavailable software Agent" * then recommend me again to download the software for this platform using auto update !
  
  Just in case, I made a new connection in the OEM but which did not help.
  
  Can anyone suggest me please an action plan to "fix" it?
  
  Thank you very much!
  Ed

  Hello

  After downloading the software agent, do you have one apply?

  If not, then pls do more...

  Setup > extensibility > auto update > click agents

  in "actions" drop-down menu, select apply.

  You can always check the software available in your OMS agent using emcli.
  Use this command to get the list of the avlble

  emcli get_supported_platforms

• database cloned from 32 64-bit platform issues.

  Here's the scenario: Prod database is running on windows server 2003 32-bit, 10.2.0.5 recently patched to 10.2.0.4.
  
  Need a test copy of this running on Server 2008 R2 64-bit, so I installed 10.2.0.4 with - ignore the switch of sysprereqs running setup.exe, then patched to 10.2.0.5, which is taken in charge on 2008 R2
  
  create a database named "test", to create directory structures, file init, etc..
  
  then copy datafiles of new destinations from the last user online, startup nomount, managed backup, create controlfile with set of base data etc. then question restore database until cancel using backup control file, apply a few archives copied from prod and then cancel and open resetlogs. (my usual process clone)
  
  but this time, when you do an open resetlogs I hunted and session close by ora-1092. I try and again beginning of database and get the errors that require data recovery files, and publish all recover data file '.. ' commands and try and open again, again put on the door. Check the alerts log and he asks "open upgrade. I connect as sys, startup mount and open upgrade, database begins!
  
  So I think I have run better catproc on this database anyway, so I try to run it (as sysdba) and get:
  
  SQL > @c:\oracle\product\10.2.0\db_1\rdbms\admin\catproc.sql
  DOC>######################################################################
  DOC>######################################################################
  DOC > the following PL/SQL block will cause an error ORA-20000 and
  DOC > end the SQLPLUS session if the user is not SYS.
  DOC > disconnect and reconnect with AS SYSDBA.
  DOC>######################################################################
  DOC>######################################################################
  DOC > #.
  DECLARE
  *
  ERROR on line 1:
  ORA-06553: PLS-801: internal error [56319]
  
  Disconnected from the database Oracle 10 g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.5.0 - 64
  little Production
  With OLAP, Data Mining and Real Application Testing options
  
  Then, connect as sys even once, stop the DB and try to upgrade to start, get again errors "datafile needs of recovery", recover the data files and open with upgrade, try running catproc again and the same error message saying that I need to be connected as sysdba , which I was.
  
  In any case, the database is in place and works ok at this point, so I stopped, issuing start and get kicked again when trying to open, save back with mount starup and then change the database open upgrade and it opens again.
  
  I think I'll just create a blank database at this stage and exp/imp, but I've been under heard that 32-bit backup could be restored to 64-bit platforms - unless I missed something somewhere?
  
  any ideas?
  
  Thank you!

  MOS document in question is 62290.1. See, for example, http://www.tek-tips.com/viewthread.cfm?qid=1606238

• What is the plan for 64-bit Windows?

  The 11G Express Edition Beta installed without warnings or errors on a virtual machine in Windows 7 64 bit. However, after installation, the following error message appears more than once in the journal alerts:
  
  7451 REL in the load indicator: Error Code = OSD-04500: illegal option specified
  S/O-error: incorrect function (OS 1). !
  
  This error is repeated every 10 seconds in the journal alerts.
  
  I understand that this is probably because of the 64 bit OS. However, it is almost impossible to buy a Windows system today is not 64-bit. If the plan is to provide only 11 G Express Edition Beta 32-bit version for Windows, I think he should at least install and run in 32-bit mode on 64-bit Windows operating systems. Or is a 64-bit version for Windows in preparation?
  
  Thank you! It's great to see progress on 11 G Express!
  
  Published by: user468360 on April 13, 2011 12:08
  I've probably hidden my question with the alerts log error code. I changed the subject to my real question: what is the plan for 64-bit Windows?
  
  Given that almost all windows systems are moving quickly to 64-bit, 11 G Express will be available in a package (32-bit or 64-bit) that installs and runs correctly on a system with 64-bit windows? Should we report bugs related 64 bits seen with the 32-bit install package so they can be fixed or just a 64-bit package? Thank you!

  A version of 64 victory will come out with the production. We had to choose more platforms or to release the beta version faster.
  -kris

• Oracle 10 g 10.2.0.3 (win 32) win64 bit platform migration

  Hello
  
  We use oracle11i (11.5.10.2) with oracle version 10.2.0.3 on windows 2000 server (32-bit) database and we get ORA-04030 error according to the Recommendation of oracle, we need to migrate the windows 64-bit platform.
  so my question is there also we need to buy new software to oracle 10g compatible win 64 platform or can we use same oracle10g software for win 64-bit to install oracle 10.2.0.3?
  
  
  
  Thank you
  
  UMAIR

  Umair,

  Contact your hardware vendor, they should be able to help. In addition, you can refer to:

  HP.com - ProLiant benchmarks
  http://h18000.www1.HP.com/products/servers/benchmarks/index.html

  Hardware requirements for Oracle APPS - Oracle Apps Benchmark White Papers
  Hardware requirements for Oracle applications

  Kind regards
  Hussein

• Is it possible to use the 32-bit firefox with the plugin java 64 bit?

  Is it possible to use the 32-bit firefox with the plugin java 64 bit?
  I would use 32-bit firefox and I already install the plugin java 64 bit.
  Is this a good choice is not to install the 32-bit java plugin?
  These will cause problems?

  Thanks in advance.
  Kind regards
  Sean

  Nope - you need the 32-bit Java to go with the 32-bit Firefox, if you want that Java run

• Since I changed the Windows 7 32-bit to 64-bit operating system, I can't use Firefox browser except change the browser in safe mode.

  Since I changed the Windows 7 32-bit to 64-bit operating system, I can't use Firefox browser except change the browser in safe mode. When I start the browser is not open and it displayed a message
  Mozilla Crash Reporter

  User Agent

  Mozilla/4.0 (compatible; MSIE 8.0; Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; Trident/4.0; SLCC2; .NET CLR 2.0.50727; .NET CLR 3.5.30729 .NET CLR 3.0.30729; Media Center PC 6.0; NET4.0C;. NET4.0E; InfoPath.3)

  Go to the address on: plant and tell us your last accident IDs. Then we can watch data specific to your accident and have a better idea of what is causing the problem.

  Given that everything goes well in safe mode, one of your extensions or themes is at fault. See Troubleshooting extensions and themes and problems of hardware acceleration to resolve common Firefox problems to figure out which one of your modules is the cause of the crash.

  Start here: https://support.mozilla.com/en-US/kb/Troubleshooting+extensions+and+themes#The_problem_does_not_occur_in_Safe_Mode

• Satellite L750 / 04 k: what is the difference between 64-bit and 32-bit Win?

  L750 / 04 k, what is the difference between the implementation than the 32-bit version or 64-bit?
  The 32-bit version supports 4 GB of RAM?

  Which should I use?

  Hello

  32-bit Windows (what Windows OS is not matter) supports max 3.2 GB of RAM
  Even if the laptop could use more RAM, Win 32 bit is capable of using only 3.2 GB

  That is why it s recommended to use the 64-bit version due to the limitation of the RAM in 32-bit

  Welcome them