ISE and failed authentications carried out by endpoints

Similar Questions

• By train and failing to carry out measures of speed

  Can someone explain to me how the linear speed CI module is supposed to work?  I tried with no successt for a while to use it to take measures to speed by using a meter.  I use a card NI 9411 digital input to accept a signal from a radar system which shows a maximum speed measured as a frequency (which is just working at a rising every 0.176 inches moved).

  Whenever I run VI I get an error in the module create channel which is as follows:

  Code:-200431

  Source: DAQmx create channel (CI-linear velocity) .vi:2530001
  Property: CI. MeasType
  asked the value: Speed: Linear encoder
  Possible values: Frequency, period, pulse width, period of Semi, separation of the two sides, pulse frequency, pulse, Pulse ticks, Position: angular encoder, Position: linear encoder, edges of County

  The task name: _unnamedTask<6>

  That, on a subject similar, is there any where a document that lists the module chassis DAQ and DAQmx measurement compatibility?  Because I do not find that documented anywhere it's obvious...

  Well so be it... I finally found a document that lists the compatibility of type of measure and appearently the only module able to do using the virtual channel of speed measurement is the 9361 OR...

• No sound while playing games and how to carry out the AV rear?

  Original title: cannot turn off surround, just 2.1 speakers.

  I only have some 2.1 speakers, but in all my games (World of Warcraft, Call of Duty, etc.) I can't hear any sound coming from the rear because there is no way to disable surround. I went through all the options in my playback devices, but found nothing. What can I do?

  Hello

  1. did you of recent changes to the system before the show?

  2. is it works much earlier?

  3 is the issue limited while playing games?

  4. What if the sound works fine in your system?

  5. don't you want to disable the sound design?

  Method 1: audio playback convenience store open

  Follow the link below and follow the steps mentioned in the link and check if it helps.

  http://windows.microsoft.com/en-us/windows7/Open-the-Playing-Audio-troubleshooter.

  Solve the problems associated with the sound of the games Microsoft or mapping programs

  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/812394 (applies to Microsoft Games).

  Method 2: Correct sound problems.

  Follow the steps mentioned in the link given below and check if this solves the problem.

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows-Vista/tips-for-fixing-common-sound-problems

  Method 3:

  Follow the link below and check if you can disable the sound surround.

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows-Vista/get-high-definition-sound-and-music-from-your-computer

  In addition, check out the link below and check if it helps.

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows/help/no-sound-in-Windows

  It will be useful.

• ISE IOS CLI authentication Quandry

  Im trying to push the limits of the ISE, as Ganymede + is not yet supported. The goal is to authenticate the switches and routers using RADIUS against ISE. I think I'm on the right track, since I can connect against ISE. However, when I login to activate the journal of ISE permissions shows lack of status of RADIUS, with an attempt failed to use $enabl15$.

  I have my unit added to ISE. An authorization profile has been created for each privilege level, I use strategy games and have the correct authz and the autht policies. Some examples of my configuration of ISE and configuration of the router. I hope that helps to solve my problem, or it can help the next troll successfully their own configuration.

  Profile of AUTH: When you choose priv-lvl = 15 after hitting save, web auth is automatically selected.

  

  Strategy game:

  policyset.PNG

  

  the router configuration

  RADIUS AAA server group Rad_AUTH1
  name of the server Rad_Auth
  !
  local authentication AAA CONSOLE connection
  AAA authentication login Rad_Auth group local Rad_AUTH1 no
  Group AAA authentication enable default Rad_AUTH1 allow none
  default AAA authorization exec no
  Group AAA authorization exec Rad_Auth if authenticated Rad_AUTH1
  start-stop radius group AAA accounting exec by default
  !

  Server RADIUS Rad_Auth
  ipv4 x.x.x.x address auth-1645 acct-port of 1646
  timeout 3
  touch 7 052F302B3B7E491B41

  line vty 0 4
  session-timeout 30
  exec-timeout 30 0
  exec authorization Rad_Auth
  authentication of the connection Rad_Auth
  entry ssh transport

  Glad that you got your own problem solved! Also, thank you for taking the time to come back and post the solution here! (+ 5 from me).

  Given that the problem is resolved you must mark the thread as "answered" :)

• Failed authentication

  Hi all

  I get "failed authentication: 22040 wrong password or secret shared invalid" message on ISE each time that a user wants to join the network.

  Any info on this will be appreciated!

  Possible cause is the user or device is unable to provide the correct identification or key RADIUS information to correspond with the external authentication source.

  Please check that the credentials of the user who is registered on the client computer are correct, and make sure that the shared secret of the RADIUS server is configured correctly in the n and Cisco ISE (they must be identical).

• JDeveloper and subversion: authentication problem

  Hello
  
  I try to use JDeveloper 11.1.2.3.0.
  Has created the connection of subversion and made the payment.
  But any attempt to validate these changes results in the following error message:
  
  svn: failed authentication.
  Please check the user name and password stored in the connection of Subversion.
  
  Any other svn client is installed.

  How can you access your rest?
  Check it out.
  Problems with Subversion in JDeveloper extension
  Subversion: Unable to import files into a local repository

• [nQSError: 43126] Failed authentication: username/password invalid, how to avoid?

  Hello
  
  I met following error: [nQSError: 43126] failed authentication: username/password invalid.
  When I started weblogic server and server used in the judgment.
  
  After poking around on the net, came across this blog: http://obiee11gqna.blogspot.com/2011/09/obiee-11g-errors-nqserror-43113.html
  
  Find password for MDS & BIPLATFORM has 'expired', managed to solve my problem and my presentation Services have been up & running.
  
  My question is, how to avoid the password SDM & BIPLATFORM to have expired in the future?
  
  Kind regards
  Jitendra

  Hi Jitendra,

  Check it out, http://www.artofbi.com/index.php/2011/03/oracle-11g-rdbms-password-expiration-default-possible-impact-on-obi-11g/

  Rgds,
  DpKa

• "To view this page, Firefox must send information that will repeat any action (for example, a search or order confirmation) that was carried out earlier."

  To view this page, Firefox must send information that will repeat any action (for example, a search or order confirmation) that was carried out earlier. Then I have to click on return or cancel. Then I have to click on return or cancel.

  How can I fix this automatically return?
  Please let me know!

  It is not possible.

  Do you use the back button to return to a previous page?

  You receive an alert to send POST data if you return to a page or refresh a page that was requested in advance from the server by submitting form via a (hidden) MESSAGE form data.
  Firefox can only make sure to get the same page send this POST form.
  Firefox doesn't know what it means shape data, so Firefox asks for confirmation before sending the form data so action can you take to repeat an action and buy another article or post a message once.
  One way to prevent this pop-up on the removal of the POST data is not to use the back button, but to open the links on a page that is requested from a server by sending a form with the date of the POST in a new tab (window) with a middle click or hold down the CTRL key and click the link.
  Then you can close the tab or window to go back.

• Spam problem out (hijack)? I see the HTML page to carry out inspections.

  My outgoing mail is blocked for "behavior spamlike. Trying to figure this out, I see that spam online various ladies could help if I can't enter sample in HTML format e-mails in their auditor. I have failed to find out how to see the underlying HTML for an outgoing email. Can it be done? I have been around the help system until I'm dizzy >

  If all of your outgoing mail is blocked for the spamlike behavior then you may need to contact your service provider.

  You can have triggered the spam server detector and now everything is blocked, regardless of if she looked like spam or not... This could be a temporary block, but you won't know until you find out by talking to your ISP to find out what happened.

  Therefore, there is no point in trying to look at HTML as that e-mail can be good but still blocked. You can save an email in drafts, then select the message to read. Click on 'Other options' and select 'View Source '.

• With Windows Live Mail error (failed authentication RPS)

  Hello

  For the past 2 days, I get this error message on my Windows Live Mail, I can get my email on Hotmail.com, but not through the Windows Live client

  Can't send or receive messages for the Live (petecjr76) account. To send and receive messages in your Hotmail account, go to http://hotmail.live.com on the Web, or try again later. To get help from Windows Live Customer Support, go to http://support.live.com and click Windows Live Mail in the list of services.

  Server error: 3204
  Server response: failed authentication RPS
  Server: 'http://mail.services.live.com/DeltaSync_v2.0.0/Sync.aspx '.
  Windows Live Mail error ID: 0x8DE20003

  Any help will be appreciated!

  Hello Petecjr76,
   
  Thanks for posting on the Community Forums of Microsoft Vista.
   
  The question you have posted is related to Windows Live mail and would be better suited to the Windows Live community. Please visit the link below to find a community that will provide the support you want.
  http://windowslivehelp.com/community/
   
  It will be useful.
   
  Thank you and best regards,
   
  Srinivas
  Microsoft Answers Support Engineer
  Visit our Microsoft answers feedback Forum and let us know what you think

• Cisco ISE and Meraki RADIUS

  I am very new to Cisco ISE and Meraki.  I try to get the Radius configuration for wireless authentication.  When I do a test of the Meraki to ISE, it passes.

  When I try to connect from my laptop, I look at the logs of the Radius and it passes; However, it does not connect me to good policy.  I keep hitting the default policy.  I have my Meraki police above the default policy in the strategy defined in article.  I have attached what looks like my strategy game.

  Devices does not really matter. Here is what I see when I create a device group (where you add the access point to this group), and then create the condition:

  networkdevicegroups.PNG

  

  And here is where I create the condition of strategy game and you should be able to select the Meraki access points:

  devicecondition.PNG

  

  This will give you the condition similar to what I posted above. This is perhaps why you aren't hit that is not matching the condition for this game.

• In anticipation of the posture with 1.3, Agent NAC 4.9.5.10 ISE and Windows 10

  Hello

  I have a client with the patch 1.3 ISE 5 installed in its network, and it tests the connection to the network from a client Windows 10. In the client, this customer has manually installed Agent NAC 4.9.5.10, and used Anyconnect 4.2.01035 (with NAM module) as supplicant 802.1 x.

  In the ISE, the 3.6.10205 - 2 4.9.5.10 NAC Agent and compliance Module is downloaded and there is that a strategy of commissioning of the customer created in order to provide customers with this version of the NAC Agent and compliance Module if this client authenticates correctly in Active Directory. There is also a political Posture that requires that the customer have a fixed version of McAffee Antivirus from the Posture.

  When connecting to the wifi network, the client authenticates properly using the user name and, after authentication, it launches the Cisco's NAC Agent in order to pass the posture. At this point, the Agent NAC pop-up displays an error indicating that the operating system of the client is not supported, although NACAgent 4.9.5.10 supports Windows 10 and patch5 ISE 1.3 also supports Windows 10. Due status Posture maintains in State waiting, the customer is not allowed to connect with the correct permissions for the network by the ISE authorization policy.

  My questions are:

  You know the reason for this error showed by NAC Agent (client operating system not supported)?

  Do you know what are the correct versions of the NAC and ISE Agent to support customers on Windows 10 connections?

  And also, Windows 10 is supported by ISE 1.3 patch5 or maybe it's better to move to ISE 2.0?

  Thanks in advance

  Concerning

  Juan

  I'll guess that maybe the VA of Cisco and databases supported OS version are not current.  Try to go to the Administration->-> Posture--> updates the settings and click on "Update Now".

• 1.2 of the ISE and made maximum PSN supported in my Persona config

  Hello people, I am setting up a way large-scale distributed of ISE and I was wondering if anyone could tell me what the maximum number of PSN is allowed in this configuration.   I was reading through an older training document with version 1.1 and suggested 5, that's why I wonder if the specs changed on 1.2 but I can't find them anywhere to practice.

  I have a large virtual machine running the MAIN admin character who is also secondary to my report & follow-up in my main data centre.

  In another State (bound to 10G) is another large VM acting as my character high school admin with primary oversight & reports.

  Across several States I want to have multiple Ssnp through geographic patterns of each State, but I don't know if I can put across enough with my current version of 1.2 and my persona config Ssnp listed above.    I need about 12 to 15 Ssnp.

  I was wondering if I need two VMs more out of my control as a node in DC1 and secondary surveillance in DC2 for more extensibility PSN.

  Any help would be greatly appreciated.

  -Thank you

  As Marvin suggested, I would look at using 1.3 at this point, unless you have any specific concerns of this version and I really want to stay with 1.2. That being said, here are my recommendations/comments:

  -Two v1.2 and v1.3 fits in fact up to 40 knots PSN

  -If none of the nodes of your PSN will be put in the same place and are layer 2 adjacent I recommend putting them in a group node and behind a load balancer. If you do not have a load balancer, I would always put them in a node group. At this time a node group can have up to 10 PSN

  -If you have 10-15 knots PSN then you should spend 2 nodes for specifically for the character of monitoring

  -The period of maximum round trip between all nodes must not exceed 200 ms

  For more information, you can always reference the "Network deployment" section in the installation guide material for ISE:

  v1.3

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/TD/docs/security/ISE/1-3/installation_guide/b_ise_InstallationGuide13/b_ise_InstallationGuide12_chapter_00.html

  v1.2

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/TD/docs/security/ISE/1-2/installation_guide/ise_ig/ise_deploy.html

  Thank you for evaluating useful messages!

• 1.3 of the ISE and NAC

  I have a client that 5508 WLCs runs through the area, and I'm catching IEEE802.1x authentication for the enterprise WLAN and WebAuth for WLAN of comments... they PSK now :(

  They have ad and ISE and NAC great interest, so my immediate thoughts are to integrate ISE AD and use ISE as RADIUS server for .1x on the WLC. Then use the WLC and ISE do WebAuth for comments... It's all of the standard stuff, but it gives the background.

  Now, we come to the interesting bit... they want to run BYOD. They are involved in the financial markets, so the BYOD must be tightly controlled. They ask on ISE coupled with the NAC, but I am not convinced that I need the NAC since the arrival of the ISE1.3. Of course, I will examine three (min) SSID, corporate knowledge, comments and BYOD, just logically distinct. I have nothing that ISE 1.2 cannot press the company and comments but BYOD must full profiling and reclamation prohibition or device before access to the net.

  Someone at - he comments or suggestions? Is ISE 1.3 enough NAC-like that I don't need more, or if this is not the case, what additional benefits does that ISE can support

  Thanks for your advice/comments/experiences

  Jim

  Hi Jim -.

  Version 1.3 offers an integrated PKI and a significantly improved services reviews experience. The internal PKI is nice if the customer does not have a PKI solution in place. Don't forget however that the PKI ISE internal can only issue certificates to BYOD devices which have boarded through the ISE BYOD "flow", you cannot use the ISE PKI to issue certificates to computers in the domain.

  With regard to the NAC: you need to specify exactly what is needed here. If you were to make "posture assessment" then ISE can do for machines based on Windows and OSX. You can check for things like: A / V, a/s, status of the firewall, Windows hotfixes. If you want to make the posture on mobile devices, so you will need to integrate ISE with MDM (mobile device management) solution such as: Airwatch, Mobile, Extend360 iron, etc. ISE may question the MDM for things like: the device is protected with a PIN, is the rooted device, is the encrypted device, etc.

  I hope this helps!

  Thank you for evaluating useful messages!

• Cisco ISE and WLC Access-List Design/scalability

  Hello

  I have a scenario that wireless clients are authenticated by the ISE and different ACL is applied depending on the rules in the ISE. The problem I have seen is due to the limitation on the Cisco WLC that limit only 64 input access list. As the installer has only a few IVR/interfaces and several different access lists are applied to the same base on user groups interface; I was wondering if there may be an evolutionary design / approach according to which the access list entries can evolve next to create a vlan for each group of users and apply the access list on the interface of layer 3 instead? I illustrated the configuration below for reference:

  Group of users 1 - apply ACL 1 - on Vlan 1

  User 2 group - apply ACL 2 - on the Vlan 1

  3 user group - apply ACL 3 - on the Vlan 1

  The problem appears only for wireless users, he does not see on wired users as the ACLs can be applied successfully without restriction as to the switches.

  Any suggestion is appreciated.

  Thank you.

  In fact, you have limitations on the side of the switch as well. Long ACL can deplete resources AAGR of the switch. Take a look at this link:

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/switches/Catalyst-3750-series-switches/68461-high-CPU-utilization-cat3750.html

  The new WLCs based on IOS XE and not the old OS Wireless/Aironet will provide the best experience in these matters.

  Overall, I see three ways to overcome your current number:

  1. reduce the ACL by making them less specific

  2 use L3 interfaces on a switch L3 or FW and the ACL is applied to them

  3. use the SGT/SGA

  I hope this helps!

  Thank you for evaluating useful messages!