ISE authorization policy issues

Similar Questions

• With the help of Framed IP Address in ISE AuthZ policy

  Hello

  I have a problem when you try to use the RADIUS-box-IP attribute in a user authorization policy. Essentially, when I try and map the Radius attribute to the custom attribute of the user in the AAuthZ profile, it won't let me as the IP box RAY has a data type of the IPv4 and the user attribute that I created has a string data type.

  I can't see the data type of the available IPv4 addresses when creating the attributes of the user.

  Is there a way to get around this?

  Thank you

  Mario

  What version of ISE / patch are you using

  The following has been fixed in ISE 1.2 patch3

  CSCuj14382 Statically impossible to assign the IP as FramedAddress

• ACS 5.2 authorization policy

  Hello

  is there a method to control access to the WLAN (PEAP) different on the same ACS 5.2 and WLC?

  In other words, ago 14:00 one of the groups have access to the domain network only the other group only have access to the internet
  and maybe a third group with access to both networks.

  Currently if I add new authorization policy, the user will have access to two networks...

  Thank you, in advance.

  Yes HRT is possible, the ssid is transported in the station id called which is an av pair sent in the access-request packet. The called-station-id format is, so you can combine this with the AD1:ExternalGroups and assign the result of access permit or deny access depending on your implementation, you can build your strategy for leave to a compound affection of "called-station-id ends with ssid". Also, the ssid is case-sensitive when acs makes its decision so keep that in mind.

  If you look at the ACS authentication report, you can see the ssid that I am referring to the id of the station called the newspaper.

  Hope that helps

  Tarik Admani
  * Please note the useful messages *.

• OAM authorization policy: scenario

  Hi all

  I need your advice to implement a solution as described below (high steps level that I can follow and implement):

  Current architecture:

  I have Siebel, IOM, OAM and OID. Users are provisioned to Siebel by IOM and connection OAM is responsible for the authentication/authorization for Siebel resources.

  Requirement:

  There are many users who are connected to using OAM and I need to make a change, a change for a specific group of users who are actually allowed to access the resource.

  Example:

  The Group has, can access resources abc

  Group B, cannot access resources abc.

  Ask you to help me with the approach without involving the IOM.

  Thank you

  Varun

  You have active LDAPSynch?

  If yes stores the user identity of the OAM is the same as the LDAP directory configured in the IOM LDAPSynch

  In the case of LDAPSynch, ROLE created in IOM translated by LDAP groups. I was referring to these LDAP groups to use in the OAM authorization policy. In a State of identity, you can also add LDAP groups. See screenshot 18-5 on top of link. 'Add users & groups' select option in "State of identity".

  Organization of the IOM is not related to LDAP groups.

  With regard to the UDF

  In the LDAP synchronization scenario if the user UDF is also get stored in the LDAP directory in the profile of the user, then you can use LDAP attribute in the user's profile to set the authorization policy in OAM. This can be done by specifying "Filter Add Search" in the same"identity".

  Concerning

  Aakash

• OIM 11 g - authorization policy to create/update via API

  Hello
  
  Anyone know if it is possible to day/create a permission policy to the OIM 11 G (11.1.1.5) via the API?
  I already managed to create an access policy, but can't get something like "AccessPolicyResourceData" for authorization policies in the API.
  
  THX!

  Haven't tried it but can you try PolicyDefinitionService.class or the OESPolicyService.class and check if it works for you?
  It has the following methods:

  createPolicy(AuthzPolicy paramAuthzPolicy)
  
  modifyPolicy(AuthzPolicy paramAuthzPolicy)
  
  deletePolicy(String paramString)
  

  HTH

• RAID - disk Local Configuration policy issue

  I'm having this problem where I set up my Service profile of base as Any Configuration mode to associate this service profile on the server (1) and then starts the operating system.

  After awhile, I create a Service Expert profile and change have my Local Disk Configuration in Raid 10 mode. Here is my problem where my service profile got a status of config-failure and cannot start.

  I read in cisco documents http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/unified_computing/ucs/sw/gui/config/guide/1.4/UCSM_GUI_Configuration_Guide_1_4_chapter28.html where it says

  Note	If you ungroup the server from a service profile when this option is enabled, and then associate with a new service profile that includes a configuration policy to local disk with different properties, the server returns a configuration mismatch error and the connection fails.

  So, how can I change the settings of my storage to RAID10 of AnyConfiguration? I tried to place the policy of scrub but was out of luck! Where is the problem?

  Hello

  I guess I should have been more precise in asking to my last question, you use the B200/230/250 or 440 blade.

  RAID 1 + 0 (i.e. RAID 10) doesn't work on the blade B440 since it takes the disk 4 min.

  . / Afonso

• Cisco ISE - authentication policy

  Hello guys,.

  Hold the opinions of a scalable strategy for authentication of users and / or the workstations in Cisco's ISE for the following scenario:

  Customer with some 130 branch offices. Each branch has an another AD domain without trust with the HQ and with the other branches.

  Knowing that the ISE supports integration with up to 50 domains, what suggestion for this case?

  Kind regards
  Daniel Stefani

  Stefani,

  Of course it will work, you can even use a centralized architecture CA, make sure just that you can distribute these certificates at endpoints...

  Another option is to check if the AD user account is limited (disabled, locked, has expired, password has expired and so on) via LDAP, but you need the username is equal to some field in the certificate (CN or SAN).

  Kind regards

  Fabio

• Policy issue COMPUTER big organization for a new application

  Hello

  I'm developing a financial application. My potential customer base is banking and finance people. I intend to deploy the application by sending the link to download the application by SMS.

  Concern: I'm targeting the people in big organization, I fear that their COMPUTER strategies cannot allow to install third-party applications via browser? Their COMPUTER strategies don't allow third-party applications to connect to the internet?

  What is the standard practice for such applications? I can't find someone mention this issue everywhere in books or documents.

  Any advice will be highly appreciated.

  Thank you very much

  Nitin

  you are safe to assume that, in a Bank (or any other company concerned about security), political technology will limit used to install 3rd party software, without the consent of the administration.

  If this isn't the case you could earn money by consulting it

  deployment via bes is not only easier for all participants (in particular, the end user), but also often the only way to install 3rd party software.

  certifications vary depending on the company.

  One of my customers say that common sense upward in contracts required fortune 500, on the parts of the code used, I had to guarantuee that enforcement does not interact with certain features and have had to revise some parts of the source code with them.

  However, a customer who pays for a license five-digit can legitimate efforts more than a download of $2.99 one.

• The ISE Solution design issues?

  Is it possible to configure ISE in the following way:

  3 locations: main campus, 1 Site (Recovery Site) & Site2

  4 devices ISE.

  Main campus: 2 devices:

  Unit 1: PAN (P) + dem (P) + PSN (Just for backup, will be configured as a second ray on all of n)

  Unit 2: PSN (will be configured as the first Radius Server on Campus n main)

  Site 1 (DR Site): 1 unit

  Unit 1: PAN (S) + PSN (the Radius Server first for local NADs, third Ray on all other n), MnT (S)

  Box 2: 1 site

  Unit 1: PSN (the Radius Server first for local DNA)

  Due to some constraints, I'm not able to test this configuration in the laboratory and by looking at the document, although not mentioned specifically theoretically it seems possible to implement this way ISE, comments of support or support is much appreciated.

  Thanks for the info Maury. Overall, your design is OK for the number of endpoints that you have decided to run. Ideally, in a distributed deployment, you would 2 x ISE servers for Admin/M & T personas and then 2 x ISE for the Services of personal politics. You can also make one of the nodes in the primary for the Admin, but backup for M & T and vice versa for a better distribution of the load. So in your situation, you might do:

  Site A:

  ISE Server #1 - Admin main and secondary M & T

  ISE Server #1 - primary PSN secondary PSN for Site B to Site A

  Site b:

  ISE Server #1 - Admin secondary and primary M & T

  ISE Server #1 - primary PSN for Site B and secondary PSN for Site has

  Yet once, you won't have that many points of concurrent endpoints so you'll be OK going with the design that you have described. However, if you want to follow the guide Cisco design and future-proof your architecture and then I would follow my suggestion :)

  I hope this helps!

  Thank you for evaluating useful messages!

• ISE AD integration issues

  G ' Day all,

  I'm trying to ad my node primary admin to RFA, but I am receving the following error message in the ISE graphical user interface.

  using the writable domain controller: addc01.abc.com

  Computer update DnsName failed.

  The user doesn't have privileges to update the DNSHostName attribute.

  Error: Either user [email protected] / * / do not have enough permissions to be

  Domain Abc.com, Zone Null

  Or this computer already has an account in the domain.

  To join, you must have domain administrator privileges.

  Join to the domain Abc.com, Null area has no

  The detailed test passes fine. I do not see errors NTP and DNS is completely resolved at both ends.

  Any help is greatly appreciated guys.

  James

  I had a similar problem.

  I received the following error message:

  The domain controller using: paprowdc.domain.corp writable = true
  Computer update dnsName failed.
  The user doesn't have privileges to update the dNSHostName attribute.

  Error: Either user [email protected] / * / doesn't have sufficient permissions to join
  field domain.corp, null zone
  or this computer already has an account in the domain.
  To join, you must have domain administrator privileges.

  Domain join 'domain.corp', 'null' area failed.

  The problem has been resolved, adding the privilege to add machine object on the announcement to the user_ad user.

  Kind regards

• Policy issues

  (1) why is there a countdown for a product of windows at the top of this page?

  If it's going to be a countdown, should not include the next version of Ubuntu and Fedora as well?

  (2) as the owner of a new brand of HP 50 G, I scoured youtube for how to videos. I found 18 pages of these videos.

  17 pages of it are in Spanish, so useless for me.

  Shoudn HP can't invest in some videos of its own? He could perk up sales.

  1. maybe for the same reason that a few years ago, you could see a lot of HP, Sony and other computer brand slogan: HP recommends Windows Vista, Sony recommends Windows Vista. Some learn slowly...

  2. a lot of Spanish videos? good excuse to learn Spanish!

• Camera + screen storm policy issues

  OS: Last generation publicly available from Verizon.

  Question: When taking a picture in portrait mode, then open it inside the java app, produces an image that is rotated 90 * to the left.

  Setting the image resolution: 640 x 480.

  When taken in landscape mode, the image shows inside the application (the file is read from file system).

  When taken in portrait mode, the image is still 640 x 480, but he was overthrown by the inside of 90 degrees to the left.  (a little hard to explain)

  E.g.

  Considered:

  1

  *

  *

  *

  Displayed as:

  1 * * *

  Is it an OS problem or am I missing something obvious?

  Thank you!

  To aid native photo app and as much as I know cannot lock this orientation programmatically.

  Lock application in landscape mode is not acceptable either.

  After some research it seems that this could well be a bug in the OS...

• Cisco ISE profiling policy

  If an end point is several strategies for profiling and each political profile creates a new identity group and unique identity group will be endpoint we present you in. I understand that an endpoint can only be profiled as a single group of identity. Another way of framing the question is, are matched top-down profiling policies or another way? Thanks in advance.

  No problem of Graham. To answer your second question: the attributes that are collected first what triggers a rule profiling would be used first. For example, let's say you have a rule of profiling CF 100 which is looking for DHCP of XYZ class identifier, and then a second rule profiling CF 100 which is looking for the MAC YES of ABC. In this case, the second rule would be affected first as the MAC information is collected before the DHCP info is. As a result, the device will be profiled and placed in the endpoint group associated with the second profiling rule until / unless additional attributes are collected which would correspond to a different rule of profiling CF > 100.

  I hope this makes sense

  Thank you for evaluating useful messages!

• whence the system.out written when it is called within a composite SOA authorization policy in IOM?

  This example

  http://docs.Oracle.com/CD/E21764_01/doc.1111/e14309/soa_api.htm#OMDEV2855

  shows how to embed java code in a composite workflow for SOA.

  but I can't find where this info is written to

  TIA

  Leo

  You must use addAuditTrailEntry instead of DD.
  

  ex:
  

  addAuditTrailEntry("---oimUserName-"+oimUserName);

  
  

  Then, you can view these logs in EM.

• PowerEdge 2970 Service Tag: NOTES from the ADMIN: maintain the label removed by privacy policy > issue of maximum size of HARD drive

  This server gave to us (a non-profit). I it upward and the work, but we need to order some new HARD drives for it. I downloaded all manuals and any other information that I could find. It seems that I have seen that there is a maximum size of 1 TB, but I can't find that.

  Can you point me in the right direction?

  Thank you, Alan

  2 TB is the largest disk will take care of any of the "RAID" controllers for this server. Mode no RAID, I heard that the SAS 6/iR will support larger disks. Away office/computer laptop/NAS discs and stick to the readers of enterprise class if you are using a PERC.