OAM authorization policy: scenario

Similar Questions

• 11g OAM AuthZ policy

  I need help for OAM 11 g AuthZ policy.
  Looking at the authorization policy, I put it for range IPAddress, user identity and time based.
  I want to create a policy that checks an attribute see if whole or not and on this basis to allow or deny. How do I do that?

  I would watch the AuthZ constraints.

  Other than that, you could simply return a variable header for the attribute you want to toggle.

• ACS 5.2 authorization policy

  Hello

  is there a method to control access to the WLAN (PEAP) different on the same ACS 5.2 and WLC?

  In other words, ago 14:00 one of the groups have access to the domain network only the other group only have access to the internet
  and maybe a third group with access to both networks.

  Currently if I add new authorization policy, the user will have access to two networks...

  Thank you, in advance.

  Yes HRT is possible, the ssid is transported in the station id called which is an av pair sent in the access-request packet. The called-station-id format is, so you can combine this with the AD1:ExternalGroups and assign the result of access permit or deny access depending on your implementation, you can build your strategy for leave to a compound affection of "called-station-id ends with ssid". Also, the ssid is case-sensitive when acs makes its decision so keep that in mind.

  If you look at the ACS authentication report, you can see the ssid that I am referring to the id of the station called the newspaper.

  Hope that helps

  Tarik Admani
  * Please note the useful messages *.

• OAM password policy

  If anyone knows of a simple, effective guide to use for a password as part of the identity OAM management policy, let me know.
  We run OAS 10.1.2.3 and OAM 10.1.4.2. SSO is used with the integration of the OAM.
  
  I tried the following, but do not get anything after login by a user? I need to test this feature also so if there is an example,
  It would be great.
  
  Console ID
  the system configuration
  password policy
  on this screen, when changing the current policy, I changed the
  Period of notice of expiry 60 password so I can get some kind of password reset to display?
  
  
  Thx for your time in advance.
  
  KA

  Mods for the authentication scheme is exposed to the: http://download.oracle.com/docs/cd/E10761_01/doc/oam.1014/b32419/idconfig.htm#BABEEDGF

• ISE authorization policy issues

  Hello team,

  I m having trouble in my implementation: the PC of the user never gets address IP of the VLAN access after AuthZ successful political.

  I have two VLANS in my implementation:

  ID VLAN 802 for authentication (subnet 10.2.39.0)

  VLAN ID 50 for Access (subnet Y.Y.Y.Y) users

  When I start my PC of the user, I get IP for VLAN 802 (10.2.39.3) and the process after the Posture, ISE inform the switch to put the PC user port in 50 of VLAN.

  Here I have my Port Configuration on the switch:

  interface GigabitEthernet0/38
  switchport access vlan 802
  switchport mode access
  switchport nonegotiate
  switchport voice vlan 120
  IP access-group ACL by DEFAULT in
  authentication event fail following action method
  action of death event authentication server reset vlan 50
  action of death event authentication server allow voice
  the host-mode multi-auth authentication
  authentication order dot1x mab
  authentication priority dot1x mab
  Auto control of the port of authentication
  restrict the authentication violation
  MAB
  dot1x EAP authenticator
  dot1x tx-time 10
  spanning tree portfast
  end

  And here, I took out political AuthZ in Action:

  7 Oct 09:22:01.574 ANG: % DOT1X-5-SUCCESS: authentication successful for the client (0022.1910.4130) on the Interface Gi0/38 AuditSessionID 0A022047000000F6126E9B17
  7 Oct 09:22:01.582 ANG: % AUTHMGR-5-VLANASSIGN: 50 VLAN assigned to Interface Gi0/38 AuditSessionID 0A022047000000F6126E9B17
  7 Oct 09:22:01.591 ANG: % EMP-6-POLICY_REQ: IP 0.0.0.0. MAC 0022.1910.4130 | AuditSessionID 0A022047000000F6126E9B17 | AUTHTYPE DOT1X | EVENTS APPLY
  7 Oct 09:22:01.591 ANG: % EMP-6-AAA: POLICY xACSACLx-IP-PERMIT_ALL_TRAFFIC-537cb1d6 | DOWNLOAD EVENT-REQUEST
  7 Oct 09:22:01.633 ANG: % EMP-6-AAA: POLICY xACSACLx-IP-PERMIT_ALL_TRAFFIC-537cb1d6 | DOWNLOAD-SUCCESS EVENT
  7 Oct 09:22:01.633 ANG: % EMP-6-IPEVENT: IP 0.0.0.0. MAC 0022.1910.4130 | AuditSessionID 0A022047000000F6126E9B17 | AUTHTYPE DOT1X | IP-WAITING FOR EVENT
  SWISNGAC8FL02 #.
  7 Oct 09:22:02.069 ANG: AUTHMGR-5-SUCCESS percent: authorization succeeded for customer (0022.1910.4130) on the Interface Gi0/38 AuditSessionID 0A022047000000F6126E9B17
  SWISNGAC8FL02 #.
  7 Oct 09:22:02.731 ANG: % EMP-6-IPEVENT: IP 10.2.39.3 | MAC 0022.1910.4130 | AuditSessionID 0A022047000000F6126E9B17 | AUTHTYPE DOT1X | IP-ASSIGNMENT OF EVENT
  7 Oct 09:22:02.731 ANG: % EMP-6-POLICY_APP_SUCCESS: IP 10.2.39.3 | MAC 0022.1910.4130 | AuditSessionID 0A022047000000F6126E9B17 | AUTHTYPE DOT1X | POLICY_TYPE named ACL. POLICY_NAME xACSACLx-IP-PERMIT_ALL_TRAFFIC-537cb1d6 | RESULT SUCCESS

  After that, I have:

  SWISNGAC8FL02 #sh auth sess int g0/38
  Interface: GigabitEthernet0/38
  MAC address: 0022.1910.4130
  IP address: 10.2.39.3
  Username: SNL\enzo.belo
  Status: Authz success
  Field: VOICE
  Security policy: must ensure
  State of security: unsecured
  Oper host mode: multi-auth
  Oper control dir: both
  Authorized by: authentication server
            Policy of VLAN: 50
  ACL ACS: xACSACLx-IP-PERMIT_ALL_TRAFFIC-537cb1d6
  The session timeout: N/A
  Idle timeout: N/A
  The common Session ID: 0A022047000000F6126E9B17
  ACCT Session ID: 0x000001A7
  Handle: 0x710000F7

  Executable methods list:
  The method state
  dot1x Authc success
  MAB does not work
  !

  Apparently, everything is OK, but isn't. The PC of the user never gets the IP address of the access VLAN 50

  If I SWISNGAC8FL02 #sh - table mac address | 0022.1910.4130 Inc.
  50 0022.1910.4130 STATIC Gi0/38
  802 0022.1910.4130 STATIC Gi0/38

  And

  SWISNGAC8FL02 #sh EMP session summary
  EMP Session information
  -----------------------
  Total number of sessions seen so far: 17
  Total number of active sessions: 1

  IP address MAC address VLAN interface Audit Session Id:
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  GigabitEthernet0/38 10.2.39.3 0022.1910.4130 802 0A022047000000F6126E9B17

  My switch is a Cisco IOS software, the software C3560E (C3560E-IPBASEK9-M), Version 15.0 (2) SE6, VERSION of the SOFTWARE (fc2)

  I use the Version ISE 1.2.1.198 Patch Info 2

  Could you help me in this case?

  Best regards

  Daniel Stefani

  It seems that the PC is underway in the field of VOICE according to the cmd auth sess int that you have demonstrated. Do you think this has something to do with your problem? I knew a few PC have problem with that.

  If you could, try to get the PC to operate in the field of DATA by sending is not the voice of ISE after permission attribute.

• OIM 11 g - authorization policy to create/update via API

  Hello
  
  Anyone know if it is possible to day/create a permission policy to the OIM 11 G (11.1.1.5) via the API?
  I already managed to create an access policy, but can't get something like "AccessPolicyResourceData" for authorization policies in the API.
  
  THX!

  Haven't tried it but can you try PolicyDefinitionService.class or the OESPolicyService.class and check if it works for you?
  It has the following methods:

  createPolicy(AuthzPolicy paramAuthzPolicy)
  
  modifyPolicy(AuthzPolicy paramAuthzPolicy)
  
  deletePolicy(String paramString)
  

  HTH

• OAM authorization cache query

  Hello
  I have a resource protected with OAM 10 g and uses a plugin for authorization for this resource which makes an LDAP call and returns the result.
  I want to know if OAM user cache works with plugins for custom authorization as well or not.
  
  Please let me know your understanding.
  
  Thank you

  The result of authorization plugin will not be cached and your plugin will be executed whenever authorization is requested.
  If you try to make a call LDAP in the plugin a better solution would be to use LDAP filters in the expressions of approval.

  Hope this helps,
  Sagar

• OAM authorization error

  Hi people,
  
  I get an error of permission of OAM (I'm new to it) when you try to use an allow rule based on the value of certain ldap attribute (attrib employeeType's value must be 'EMP'). Here's what I have:
  On the side of the access system: simple licensing in Authz Mgmt (oblix/lib/authz_attribute under the name shared lib, RA_SubjectDN as user Param, ruleExpression as the param name w worthless req)
  On the political side Bishop: area w authorization rule based on the diagram above (the other rule genuine works fine) with the following: Authz rule Plugin Params: RA_SubjectDN profile attributes passed to the plug-in, ruleExpression as name of required parameters, w value employeeType = "EMP". Authz rule action performs a redirection to a url certail if failure (does not work). Now for the default rules > permission Expression, all I have is my Authz rule.
  
  Now, if I disable the rule Authz leaving only the genuine one, everything works fine. When I try to access the resource protected by using Authz rule, I get an error for Oracle Access Manager operating in the browser, then the following error message in the server access log to the:
  WARNING AUTHZ_MGMT 0 x 00001165 /usr/abuild/Oblix/coreid1014/palantir/authz_common/src/authzexptree.cpp:99 "error while evaluating the rule" raw_code ^ RuleID 8 ^ 20091125T 15554836330 returned error is ^ assessment returned permission need more information as the return code
  
  I realize it's my rule Authz or schema causes the error, but I can't figure out who it is. I was wondering if someone could direct me to the right direction.
  
  Thank you
  Roman
  
  Published by: user10433316 on December 8, 2009 07:49

  Hi Roman,

  You may need to put the page failure too in the 'Inconclusive permission' actions in the Expression of approval. Regarding where to put the header variables it is in large part a matter of taste. However, there may be cases where you have the same rule applied to various resources, but sets a different variable header - in this case, you will need to put them in the Expression.

  Kind regards
  Colin

• OAM: password policy coherence between the Server LDAP and OAM

  Customer has an OAM installed using an LDAP server, say MS - AD 2003, as users, policies, and the configuration data store.
  
  The customer has configured their LDAP server, password policies claiming for example that the users passwords expire 60 days after they have been fixed and this departure 5 days before they expire, users, at the opening of the session, should be warned that their passwords are about to expire.
  
  Customer has configured identical policies inside the OAM.
  
  (A) consider the following sequence:
  
  Day X: user connects to the 'User Manager' component of OAM in the identity and, through 'My profile' admin console, changes his password.
  
  Day X + Y (1 < = Y < 55): the user connects to the MS - AD domain and sets its password interfacing directly the LDAP server, outside of OAM (for example: by pressing CTRL-ALT-DEL and invoking 'Change Password' in a field of MS-Windows, MS - AD-controlled).
  
  Question A.1) day X + 56: user tries to access a web resource protected by OAM: OAM made realize that the user has changed the password recently (through the LDAP server), and that should NOT be notified?
  
  Question A.2) day X + 61: user tries to access a web resource protected by OAM: OAM made realize that the user changed the password recently (through the LDAP server), and that should NOT be asked to change his or her password again?
  
  (B) consider the following sequence:
  
  Day X: user connects to the MS - AD domain and sets its password interfacing directly the LDAP server, outside of OAM (for example: by pressing CTRL-ALT-DEL and invoking 'Change Password' in a field of MS-Windows, MS - AD-controlled).
  
  Day X + Y (1 < = Y < 55): the user connects to the 'User Manager' component of OAM in the Administration of identity and through 'My profile' console, changes his password.
  
  Question B.1) day X + 56: the user is trying to connect to the MS - AD domain: MS - AD made realize that the user has changed his password to recently (OAM), and as it should NOT be notified?
  
  Question B.2) day X + 61: the user is trying to connect to the MS - AD domain: MS - AD made realize that the user has changed his password to recently (OAM), and that should NOT be asked to change his or her password again?
  
  
  
  Kind regards
  
  
  Angelo Carugati

  (A) you're done. OAM is not aware of changes in password performed at the entrance to the user if the change does not take place through OAM. There is no good solution because you have two different versions of the truth, even if they are logically equivalent policies with us will tell the expiry of 60 days, apply to the same person. A possible solution is to be synchronized with the attributes that store things password policies in AD (as when the user has changed the password) to the attributes of the political equivalents of associated storage stuff in OAM password (as when the user has changed the password - oblastsomething). I don't know if this synchronization is still possible, but it's an idea. AD and OAM attributes can both live in AD, but they are distinct attributes in separate containers.

  (B) you are ok. AD is aware of the change, and is aware of the change.

• whence the system.out written when it is called within a composite SOA authorization policy in IOM?

  This example

  http://docs.Oracle.com/CD/E21764_01/doc.1111/e14309/soa_api.htm#OMDEV2855

  shows how to embed java code in a composite workflow for SOA.

  but I can't find where this info is written to

  TIA

  Leo

  You must use addAuditTrailEntry instead of DD.
  

  ex:
  

  addAuditTrailEntry("---oimUserName-"+oimUserName);

  
  

  Then, you can view these logs in EM.

• Managing roles using the solution of the OIM/OAM/OID

  Dear members

  I am faced with confusion while providing the solution about the OAM and OID.

  We have the portal WC system where authentication solution implemented using OAM 11 g. We expect authentication based on roles with the help of OID/IOM.

  I hear, by authentication based on roles, we're essentially the user roles will find in these roles. So they have will go through SSO system and their landing page will be the same. But the controls and links will be displayed according to their role.

  We do not use oracle role manager then manage it using OID.

  Is there a possible solution. Please help me its urgent.

  Thanks in advance.

  
  

  Concerning

  Arun Kumar Singh
  

  Hi Arun,

  In OAM, you can define authorization policies that allow or deny access to resources based on a value of attribute (of the logged in user). For example, you might allow access to the url/admin only to users who have a value of 'Administrator' in an attribute. Another approach is simply to set the attribute as a Variable for header (this is also defined in an OAM authorization policy) so that it is passed to the receiving application, which can then query the value of the attribute and take appropriate action.

  In these cases, OAM is only using the values of the attribute or send them to another application. To manage the values (put them properly for users/applications etc.) you would use a tool like the IOM to ensure that they are properly sized.

  Kind regards

  Colin

• Urgent: Authorization of OAM

  Hi all
  
  I'm trying to implement permission such as the user of belonging to a certain group of oid (oid is my store of users) are allowed to see a page. I implemented the strategy approval accordingly but somehow, it was not implemented and all users are able to access the http resource. I tried with authentication of faucet base OAAM and LDAP authentication simple oam on LDAP authentication, but the same results, my Tester of access, I get the success of permission each time.
  
  Details of my environment.
  
  OSH :-11.1.1.6.0
  WebGate :-11.1.1.5.0
  OAM :-11.1.1.5.0
  
  details of the strategy: -.
  Authorization policy
  
  Name:-political protection of resources
  Success URl:-null
  URL of failure:-null
  Use the implicit constraints:-ACTIVATED
  Identity:-DISABLED
  
  Resources:-protected.html
  
  Constraints
  Name:-enable Group
  Class:-identity
  Type:-allow
  
  Constraints: Details
  Type: allow
  StoreName: OIMIDStore (OID)
  Entity name: group1
  
  Answers
  Name: OAM_REMOTE_USER
  Type: Header
  Value: $user.userid
  
  I'm not going wrong somewhere or some other configuration is required for the feature to work.
  Please let me know if you need more input from me.
  
  Any input would be useful
  
  Kind regards

  Hello

  Before watching your authorization rules, can check the SSOOnlyMode parameter in the oam - config.xml is set to 'false '? Otherwise, OAM will only with authentications, no permissions.

  Kind regards
  Colin

• order of the authentication and authorization air ISE

  Hello

  I am looking to configure ISE to authenticate joined AD PC (Anyconnect NAM help for user authentication and the machine with the EAP chaining) and profile Cisco IP phones. The Pc and phones connect on the same switchport. The switchport configuration was:

  switchport
  switchport access vlan 102
  switchport mode access
  switchport voice vlan 101
  authentication event fail following action method
  multi-domain of host-mode authentication
  authentication order dot1x mab
  authentication priority dot1x mab
  Auto control of the port of authentication
  MAB
  added mac-SNMP trap notification change
  deleted mac-SNMP trap notification change
  dot1x EAP authenticator

  The configuration above worked well with authentication sessions 'show' of the switch showing dot1x as the method to the field of DATA and mab for VOICE. I decided to reverse the order of authentication/priority on the interface of the switch so that the phone would be authenticated first by mab. As a result, the authentication sessions 'show' of the switch showing mab as a method for both VOICE and DATA.

  To avoid this I created a permission policy on ISE to respond with an "Access-Reject" when the "UseCase = Lookup host" and the endpoint identity group was unknown (the group that contains the PC AD). This worked well worked - the switch would attempt to authenticate the PC and phone with mab. When an "Access-Reject" has been received for the PC, the switch would pass to the next method and the PC would be authenticated using dot1x.

  The only problem with this is that newspapers soon filled ISE with denys caused by the authorization policy - is possible to realize the scenario above without affecting the newspapers?

  Thank you
  Andy

  Hi Andy -.

  Have you tried to have the config in the following way:

   authentication order mab dot1x authentication priority dot1x mab

  This "order" will tell the switchport always start with mab , but the keyword 'priority' will allow the switchport to accept the authentications of dot1x to dot1x devices.

  For more information see this link:

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/products/collateral/iOS-NX-OS-software/identity-based-networking-service/application_note_c27-573287.html

  Thank you for evaluating useful messages!

• How to pass the headers to the request of the child which is protected by OAM

  Hello

  I joined Oracle Webcenter Portal (WCP) with 11 GR 2 OAM. I'm passing headers to WCP via the authorization policy. We have child application developed using java that is available with in iFrame in WCP. Since this java application is accessible with in the iFrame, it cannot retrieve the headers that I'm passing to WCP. How can I switch from headers to this java OAM iFrame application? I have to create the new application domain and add headers to the new authorization policy?

  Enjoy your entries.

  It was with incorrect authentication rules. He now works as expected.

• SSO OAM flow

  Hi experts, OAM,

  I read the docs published by oracle SSO

  I have a few questions:

  1. when the user requests a protected resource then webgate intercept and check isProtected() now the query is == > check isProtected() is at the level of engine for the OAM server or that fact via webgate (via the DTP Protocol)?

  2. in steps final when user POST validate the credentials to the OAM server and server OAM and create Session and send the RESPONSE encrypted webgate so that webgate ADJUSTABLE cookie OAMAuthnCookie_host_port now the query is: once this is done then what happens exactly?  WebGate redirect OAM yet for Authz or serve the user resorce?

  Thank you

  Vijay

  Responds as follows

  1 Webgate sends the request of PAO (IsResrcOpProtected) Protocol in OAM engine. OAM engine evaluates strategies to come to any decision. If you enable the server logs of the OAM at TRACE level, you can see (IsResrcOpProtected) PAO request / response in the log file.

  2. once the OAM authentication cookie is set up, it has 302 (this is the answer to the obrar.cgi) & location header is set to url (url requested originally). In the next step that browser would request protected url and send the authentication of the OAM with her cookie. At this point webgate sends the request to the server OAM for check approval (message protocol of PAO to the OAM server). If the authorization is successful you will see url protected load. If the authorization is refused, you will see an error OAM (operation error Oracle Access Manager) default page or redirect to the url defined in the url of the failure of the authorization policy

  Concerning

  Aakash