J2ME, 1.4 compliance

Got into a discussion with an Android Developer.  He said that the Java of BB environment is a J2ME environment. It really is a Java expert, which I am not, but which sounded not right for me. He is developing for Android, and uses 1.6.

I am forced to 1.4 What this has to do with J2ME?

The technical supports of J2ME 1.4 compliance, i.e. which BlackBerry Smartphones also comply.

Tags: BlackBerry Developers

Similar Questions

  • I've updated to v10.0 version, now a specfic program that runs using a bowser does not work. The problem is when the program runs a compliance test the following error message is displayed in the test results: Test; Version of the browser, the Test result

    COMPLIANCE TEST
    Results of Test test
    Firefox browser
    Version 1 browser higher than 2.0 must
    Acrobat Reader Version 9.5.0.270
    Sun Java Plug-ins active true
    Java JAVA version
    JavaScript 1.8
    Flash Flash Player 11
    ERROR Please correct

    This program is probably only read 1 of the number 10 - IOW, it is not able to read a number with 2 digits before the decimal point.

    Contact the developer of this program and let them know that they have some Fixin ' to do.

    See the MP I send to you. See your Inbox at the top of the forum pages.

  • NI 9265 compliance voltage

    Someone can give me a decent reason why voltage compliance on the NI 9265 is only 12V, but you can provide the map with 9-36VDC?  The process control industry REALLY want to know if there is any chance to update this one day.

    Maybe that's a problem for the exchange of ideas.  I could see where try it power several devices from a single loop could require higher compliance voltage.

    The distributed system that you refer to seems like an interesting challenge.

  • IviSwtch specific Test IVI Driver compliance in CVI crashing

    I have problem with the IviSwtch-specific driver. I have finished all of the code for this driver and test in CVI specific tool called 'Test IVI Driver. " Structure and functioning of the special series of tests without any errors. Problem is with the compliance test that returns:

    the driver could not be initialized by the class driver.

    Compliance test was interrupted.
    Error returned: bffa0011
    Error message: function or method not supported.

    I tried to add dll exports based on this solution http://digital.ni.com/public.nsf/allkb/1DCA138862E75119862576C5006EA144

    After doing this compliance test comes crashing down and I have to close.

    Someone met with such a problem? I would be grateful for any help.

    Concerning

    Tomasz

    > The format of DLL version is valid.

    ERROR: DLL version is incompatible with the version of the header file.

    All attributes have the exact names.

    All attributes have correct data types.

    This error means that the revision of the generated .dll does not match the version major and minor, defined in the header. This should not be a conern if you won't release the pilot to customers and that you take care of revision.

    > ERROR: the driver is not c > ompliant with the Inherent group because:

    -The following intrinsic attributes are not implemented:

    INSTRUMENT_MANUFACTURER
    INSTRUMENT_MODEL

    It is difficult to say the reason for the root of this problem, but there might be something does not work in your code. What is the definition of these powers? OR send your project to [email protected]. I think that NEITHER could help to take a look inside.

    Thank you

    Charles

  • System Center 2012 - data from compliance software

    I have my installation of SCCM 2012 connected to a WSUS server.

    All updates are synchronized via SCCM perfectly, however none of the compliance data has been entered.

    Conformity assessment is enabled in the default settings of the client.

    I tried to force the recovery of these data by downloading the required peripheral collections computer strategy, still no luck.

    Can anyone shed some light on this for me?

    Thank you

    Hello

    Your question is beyond the scope of this community.

    I suggest that repost you in the TechNet Forums:

    https://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/SystemCenter/en-us/home?category=ConfigurationManager

    "Forums SCCM".

    https://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/home?category=systemcenter2012configurationmanager

    See you soon.

  • Service Pack compliance - SQL - SCOM

    We have:

    SCOM R2 2012

    SQL MP is up to date

    The question:

    We rely on the compliance of Service Pack within the SQL MP in order to know when the SQL servers fall in non-compliance.  He worked up to 1.5 months ago.  It worked so well, that it has become a tool for our team of SQL.

    We have realized that it stopped working when the SQL team members out of non-compliant servers where we have not received any notification.

    There is little documentation about this tool.

    (1) how do SCOM servers communicate with MS on knowledge when check compliance?  My hunch is that something has changed in the Internet network access.

    (2) is just use MS Updates?

    Any help will be greatly appreciated.

    Thank you!!!

    Hello

    Your question is beyond the scope of this community.

    Please repost your question in the SQL Server TechNet Forums.

    https://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/SQLServer/en-us/home?category=SQLServer

    Or here:

    https://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/SystemCenter/en-us/home?category=systemcenteroperationsmanager

    See you soon.

  • 2012 Foundation Server license compliance

    The server has not completed the compliance audit of the licenses. If the server is joined to a domain, make sure that the server can connect to a domain controller. If the license compliant check cannot be performed, the server will automatically stop in 0 days

    I started to get this two small server running Server 2012 Foundation R2, they work well for almost a year into two separate companies. All of the sudden they both started to get this error. The server are Fujitsu, both running the OEM of ROK Fujitsu version are authorized and registered with microsoft. They work together in a 'working group' envioment and both have 9/10 users (Foundation supports 15 users) that I've seen so much after that, but neither gives an answer before stright as to what is the problem and how to fix it? a moment to give a shared other printer installed DNS, I checked both and both work very well. The two server is the only server on the network and is configured as a tourist server but are not used as such users share only 1 or 2 folders and print nothing else is used. Any pointer appsiated.

    Hello

    Post your question in the TechNet Server Forums, as your question kindly is beyond the scope of these Forums.

    http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/WindowsServer/en-us/home?category=WindowsServer

    See you soon.

  • The server has not completed the compliance audit of the licenses. If the server is joined to a domain, make sure that the server can connect to a domain controller.

    Hi all

    Can I confirm with expert from Microsoft, it's windows foundation server 2012 may not be the first domain controller (which means that the first AD in the forest)? It must be attached to the root of the forest as a domain controller. If I'm promoting it to be first DC in new forest, he invites you to "the server has not completed the compliance audit of the licenses. If the server is joined to a domain, make sure that the server can connect to a domain controller. If the license compliant check cannot be completed, the server will automatically close in 9 days...

    Thank you & best regards
    Andy

    Hi Andy,.

    Your question of Windows is more complex than what is generally answered in the Microsoft Answers forums. It is better suited for the IT Pro TechNet public. Please post your question in the TechNet Windows Server Forums:
    http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en/category/WindowsServer

    Hope the helps of information.

  • PCI Compliance Server 2012 IIS 6.2

    I have a client that is running Server 2012 with IIS 6.2 and so far I've supported all the questions except two to make them compatible PCI.

    Here are the two imminent failures.

    Server is sensitive to the BEAST attack 443/tcp
    STATE OF PCI COMPLIANCE
    PCI severity: MEDIUM
    IN CASE OF FAILURE
    DETAILS OF THE VULNERABILITY
    CVSSv2 Base Score: 4.3 (AV:N / AC:M / to the: N / reports / i: s/o: N)
    Gravity: potential
    Category: Browser Exploit against SSL TLS
    CVE ID: CVE 2011-3389
    Bugtraq ID: 49388 49778
    OSVDB: 74829
    References Microsoft: MS12-006
    References of providers: CERT: TA12-010 has CERT - VN:VU #864643 HP: HPSBMU02900
    UBUNTU:USN - 1263-1 SECTRACK:1026103 SECTRACK:1025997
    SECTRACK:1029190 APPLICATION: 49778 SUBMISSION: 49388 REDHAT:RHSA - 2012:0006
    REDHAT:RHSA - 2011:1384 MS: MS12 - 006-201406-32 GENTOO:GLSA

    ------------------------------------------------------

    osCommerce allows cross-site scripting 443/tcp
    STATE OF PCI COMPLIANCE
    PCI severity: MEDIUM
    FAILURE of the XSS/SQL/SSL vulnerabilities are not compatible PCI
    DETAILS OF THE VULNERABILITY
    CVSSv2 Base Score: 4.3 (AV:N / AC:M / to the: N / c: n / I: P / A:N)
    Severity: concern
    Category: Cross site scripting
    CVE ID: CVE-2003-1219
    Bugtraq ID: 9238
    OSVDB: -.
    Microsoft references: -.
    References of providers: QUOTE: 9238
    Details: Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the function tep_href_link in
    for osCommerce before 2.2 - MS3 html_output.php allows remote

    Hello

    Question about Windows Server 2012 are best addressed in the TechNet forums. Ask your questions here: https://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/windowsserver/en-US/home

  • How can I make sense of compliance SCCM reports?

    Hello

    I've created several update lists in SCCM. I have planned deployments and waited patiently as they occur. Now, when I jump into SCCM reporting to see how consistent my workstations are against these lists, I'm surprised by the<20%>

    Drilling down to individual computers in this list, I can see that SCCM reports compliance based on all THE updates that are available for these workstations, not the list updated I asked a compliance report for. Things like KB2545698, which is the size of the police and of irregularities in Internet Explorer 9 vs IE8?  I have not even approved or deployed that day and did not want to follow the compliance against it?

    In short, how to get the report of "Overall compliance" in SCCM for the display of results for the update of the list selected when generating the report and no compliance report on every possible update these workstations could potentially install if I approved and deployed (as this information is ZERO make them for me).

    Thank you

    Max

    How does this relate to the features of Windows Update?

    Tip: This is a forum for specific consumers. Try to post in the forums for it professionals in place => http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en/category/w7itpro, windowsvistaitpro, windowsxpitpro /

    On the other hand, you can find the Windows Server support in these forums: http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en/category/windowsserver

    Specific Windows Server security sub-forum: http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/winserversecurity/threads

  • HIPAA compliance software

    I'm looking for a program to use that will be in HIPAA compliance when sending protected electronic health information. Any suggestions?

    Thank you!

    Kristin

    Why do you want to ask in a forum of Microsoft Windows?

    Let me Google that for you

    You might also be interested in
    http://www.oregonhipaaforum.org/
    http://www.emrandhipaa.com/

  • Announcement of subscription for trojan - sms.j2me.redbrowser.a is messing up computer, how can I stop it?

    How to rid a your Ad for < trojan-sms.j2me.redbrowswer.a=""> who's constantly bugging me to register for money?

    Hello the coves of hermits.

    1. when exactly you get invites him to register?

    2. this prompt seems to you like a pop up?

    3. What is the security software installed on your computer?

    This problem can be caused if there is a Virus infection on your computer. I suggest that you run an on-line analysis of Windows Onecare on your computer and check if you have the same problem.

    http://OneCare.live.com/site/en-us/Center/whatsnew.htm

    Thank you
    Irfan H, Engineer Support Microsoft Answers. Visit ourMicrosoft answers feedback Forum and let us know what you think.

  • P2014H vs P2014Ht of regulatory compliance

    What is the difference of P2014H and P2014Ht monitors?  Notice that the P2014Ht is labeled regulatory compliance.  There is a physical difference between the two?  Some monitors are actually marked with the numbers of different model like P2014H or P2014Ht?  Thank you.

    There is no difference. Go here and you can see that there is only one monitor to P2014H. The name of Dell's business model is P2014H. The regulation is called P2014Ht.

  • How to use the gateway carrier on BlackBerry J2ME WAP?

    How to use the gateway carrier on BlackBerry J2ME WAP? Because the default gateway on BlackBerry is "blackberry.net". How to hard code in the application to force the application to use the WAP gateway? An example of code? Thank you!

    You can specify the specific settings of the WAP gateway within the Connector.open () method. There is a knowledge base of any developer this article here:

    http://www.BlackBerry.com/knowledgecenterpublic/livelink.exe/fetch/2000/348583/800451/800563/What_Is_-_Different_ways_to_make_an_HTTP_or_socket_connection.html?nodeID=826935&vernum=0

  • Cisco's preferred compliance policies

    Hello - I do a compliance in PI for QoS verification strategy. I would like to create a policy that would look to make sure that the QoS is correctly applied to all interfaces of contactors. Is it possible that PI for this in the configuration of compliance policies?

    Andrew,

    The attached XML file contains the definition of a compliance strategy that will review the commands you want on ports configured as access, trunk or Port-Channel.

    Extract and import under Configuration > compliance > policies.

    Then, create the profile under Config > compliance > profiles and add policy. From there you can run it on the desired devices.

    Please rate the thread if it helps.

    Luis

Maybe you are looking for