JOINT-2 flow in Bypass Mode?

Similar Questions

• Bypass mode on sensor 7110

  Hello world

  Need to confirm that under fixed sensor line if bypass mode indicates - Yes

  It will allow traffic

  the death of sensor

  or it is in the process of restarting, or if the sensor is upgraded from version 5.3 to 5.4

  Concerning

  Mahesh

  Hello Manu,

  Yes, it will allow the traffic at the time of the upgrade with the only exception being the sensor every reboot

  for a while in the process, it will cause packet drops for a while.

  Let me know if you have any questions.

  Thank you

  Ankita

• Cisco JOINT and IPS hardware bypass

  Hi all

  I have a question about the Cisco JOINT, ASA - AIP - SSM (IPS) and material of the IPS 4200 bypass unit series. Please let me know if the material fails in both cases how to cross traffic. Is there any circumvention of integrated equipment built in the same

  Concerning

  Ankur

  Sorry for the late reply. I've been on vacation for a week.

  ByPass hardware is not available for the JOINT-2 no matter if you use inline vlan pairs or couples inline interface.

  For devices need special interface cards or a hardware bypass switch separate, and none of them are available on the JOINT-2.

  You must configure your network so that there is a second way around the JOINT 2 JOINT-2 failure.

  This can be done with a standard network cable.

  Suppose you have your JOINT-2 configured for inline vlan VLAN 10 matching and 20.

  Configure a standard switchport as an access port on vlan 10.

  Set up an another standard switchport as an access port on vlan 20.

  Now using a standard network cable connect these 2 all switch ports.

  Stop your JOINT-2 and traffic should now be passed through this network cable and your network connectivity must be maintained.

  Bring your JOINT-2 backup, and now spanning tree runs and will choose the JOINT-2 or the network as the main way and the other cable will set in a State of block.

  Run ' show vlan spanning-tree 10 ' and ' show vlan spanning tree 20 "to determine if the cable ports or port JOINT-2 is in a BLK State.»

  If the cable ports are in a State BLK, then you don't need to modify the spanning tree.

  If the JOINT-2 port is in a State BLK, then you need to change the spanning tree cost and/or priority for JOINT-2 port by using the following commands:

  -[No] port-channel channel_number-STP intrusion detection doesn't cost port_cost

  Defines the cost of port tree covering for the data port on the specified module. Without the option restore shipping tree covering for the data port on the module specified in the default value.

  -[not] port-channel channel_number spanning tree priority priority intrusion detection

  Sets the priority of the port spanning tree for the data port on the specified module. Without the option restores the priority of port spanning tree for the data port on the module specified in the default value.

  To learn more about spanning-tree and how these parameters interact with spanning tree you can look through this section of the user guide for the switch or to search cisco.com for documentation of spanning tree:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/partner/docs/switches/LAN/catalyst6500/IOS/12.2Sx/configuration/guide/spantree.html

  NOTE: Your switch must be configured for rapid PVST for failover more rapid. Work with your administrator to switch to determine which spanning tree Protocol is used on your switch. The JOINT-2 does not work with STDS to ensure that STD is not used.

• Oracle 12 c (12.1.0.1): joint audit with audit_trail = XML mode, no check XML file generated

  Hello

  Working on a new installation of Oracle 12 c EE (12.1.0.1) in RHEL 6.5 environment: joint audit mode (unified audit trail is turned on) and audit_trail = XML.

  However, no verification of the XML files are generated in audit_file_dest.  What additional configuration is required to use audit_trail = XML in joint audit mode?

  Hello

  If you enable audit unified, that is no longer the mixed mode, mixed mode, that's what you get by default, once you enable the unified audit all audit records will share the internal unified audit trail and xml audit is no longer works (essentially audit_trail parameter is ignored).

  Greetings,

  Damage ten Monkshood

• Mode for blackBerry Smartphones Bypass in case - Storm2

  Is there a way to bypass mode 'sleep' so that in the case? I use it like a vent riding in my car; It's the only thing I use this holser for and I know that he uses a lot of battery. He will be in a charger while I drive. Any suggestions? Thanks in advance.

  There is not a way through the operating system.

  Two options:

  1. remove the magnets from the case (use a paper clip to determine where they are located) or get a Holster without the magnets of the sleeper.

  2 see the BBLight application, which will keep the device on. I don't remember exactly, but I think that it will work even in the case.

  Nevertheless, in the case, your always adjustable device for you inform messages, etc..

• JOINT inspection on 100% load

  Now I have JOINT with 100% load on the rush hour and followed by missed packets percentage increasing at this time where inspection.

  The JOINT interface puts as an interface promiscuity

  It's my network throughput will be limited by the load max JOINT inspection / flow which is 600Mbps?

  Thank you

  Marcel.

  No, the flow wil not be limited in the network when you are in promiscous mode. But your visibility for attacks is very limited.

  You must configure your settings of term/capture on the 6 k 5 only send so much traffic that this module can handle the method.

  Please keep in mind that the JOINT-2 is a system of ten years and cannot catch up with the typical traffic demand, we are having today. It's time to change the JOINT against a real external sensor.

• IDSM2 on the inline 6500 IOS mode support?

  Hello

  I have a JOINT-2 running IPS5.1 (1 d) (recently updated to 4.x) software that sits on a 6500 IOS.

  The IPS Device Manager shows gi0/7 and gi0/8 as well in Promiscuous mode. There is no option to change the inline mode and pair them up.

  Is it so that JOINT-2 currently supports only Promiscuous mode?

  If so, this module is always as IDS despite the execution of IPS5.1. Is it not? What is the advantage that I get after upgrade from 4.x to 5.1?

  -Vasanth

  There are 2 pieces of the puzzle.

  There is the JOINT-2 version and it takes in charge, but also the native IOS of Cat 6 K version and that it supports.

  Supports the v5.1 (1 d) JOINT-2

  (a) promiscuous mode.

  (b) mode InLine Interface pair (2 interfaces are matched to online tracking) and also

  (c) pair online mode of Vlan (2 VLANS on a single interface is matched for online tracking, you will also see it called inline-on-a-stick)

  But for these features to be used, the code switch must also support the configuration on the side of the switch of the JOINT-2 for each of these 3 features.

  Native versions of IOS prior to 12.2 (18) SXE will only support the Promiscuous on JOINT-2 mode.

  12.2 (18) SXE and later versions support Interface InLine mode on JOINT-2 pair.

  No native IOS version does currently support InLine Vlan pair on JOINT-2 mode (a new versions native IOS with this support is currently in development).

  For inlining (IPS), you need to run a Native IOS version 12.2 (18) SXE and later and on the JOINT-2 run IPS versions 5.1 (or even older 5.0).

  (NOTE: Cat OS 8.5 (1) takes in charge the 3 modes of JOINT-2.) Therefore, if you use cat instead of the native IOS OS, then run version 8.5 (1) to have access to all the features of IPS 5.1 (1) on the JOINT-2)

  If you run a Native IOS version prior to 12.2 (18) SXE and the JOINT-2 then it can run in "Promiscuous" mode even if 5.1 (1) is responsible for the JOINT-2.

  However, even in "Promiscuous" mode the IPS 5.1 (1) software has a few advantages.

  There are several engines and engine parameters are only supported in version 5.1 and not the version 4.0. (So there are several signatures that are either one) not yet created for sensors 4.x, or b) signature 4.x is not as precise as the signature of 5.x in new engines.

  (These new engines are proved invaluable in writing signatures to detect some of the new attacks that came out last year).

  There are of course other benefits:

  For example:

  (1) risk of note to best aid priority to alerts.

  (2) fitlering more flexible mechanism for alerts that allows individual actions of fitlering

  The 2 features above are only 2 of the new features that have been added in 5.0 and 5.1 that apply both of promiscuity and online modes.

• JOINT-2-data ports

  Hello

  I took over managing a JOINT-2 6500 implementation, as far as I can see it has been configured in

  "Promiscuous" mode with a single virtual sensor assigned to two data ports 0/7 & 0/8.

  The switch was configured with the following options:

  intrusion detection module 8 access management port - vlan 507
  intrusion detection module 8 ports data access 1 - vlan 507

  monitor the 66 session source vlan 501-509, 518-520, 601-613
  monitor the session 66 intrusion-detection-module 8-port data destination 2

  can someone tell me why the data port of second order utilsed 1 and the background command uses the data port 2, it's valid and recommended?

  Thank you

  D

  So a little bit about the architecture of the JOINT.

  JOINT has a management or command and control (gig0/2) port and 2 data (gig0/7 & gig0/8) ports

  These ports on JOINT connect to the 6500 on the backplane.

  JOINT Gig0/7 connects to the data port 1 on 6500.

  JOINT Gig0/8 connects to the data port 2 on 6500.

  The configuration involves two things:

  1 setting up JOINT (Date, time, assigning virtual devices to interfaces, tuning signature... etc.)

  2. configuration of 6500 to send traffic to the JOINT.

  You plan to put the JOINT in promiscuity or inline mode?

  The configuration on the 6500 is different for the two modes.

  Configuration:

  intrusion detection module 8 access management port - vlan 507

  This puts the management port to vlan 507

  intrusion detection module 8 ports data access 1 - vlan 507

  Puts data port 1 in vlan 507. This is usually done in inline mode.

  monitor the 66 session source vlan 501-509, 518-520, 601-613
  monitor the session 66 intrusion-detection-module 8-port data destination 2

  It is an extended configuration that sends a copy of the data from the VLANs to the port of data 2.

  This is done when JOINT running in promiscuous mode.

  So in your case, the configuration is correct on 6500 sending traffic to JOINT depends on what mode, you want the METHOD to be run in.

  Please see the link below which will explain how to configure 6500 promiscuity or JOINT configuration in inline mode.

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/security/IPS/7.0/Configuration/Guide/CLI/cli_idsm2.html

  Let me know if you have any questions.

  -Sid

• Use the PXI-2630 terminal block in a matrix configuration?

  My apologies in advance for the length of this post!

  I use the PXI system with PXI-2530 switch modules, related to a series of USE with PXI-2632 (1W matrix 8 X 16) connector blocks and a PXI-4071 DMM for each switch module. My request, uses the PXI system for measurement of current and voltage external to verify and/or benefit from restraints of reliability. A requirement of the application, therefore, is that there must be a ride from DC through each USE with change of the minimum impedance as the application between its "bypass" mode switches and its mode 'measure '.

  I used this Setup with connector blocks of matrix in conjunction with one of our test systems, and I am satisfied with the results. I started working with the Test System, has no easy connection to catch HAD, I needed to build a kind of interface the PXI system and a resistive faced load HAD, it was not difficult to build in the wires that attach to the Terminal screw of the 2632. He did turn into a nest of a coded son rat I did my best to keep clean and tidy in different bundles, however. Fortunately for the cable fasteners!

  My next task is to use this application with system B Test, which has an interface of pines buck header with which each signal that goes to or from the DUT can be obtained. No welding or pass the wires through the openings where the designers have no intention of son to be stuffed. I intend to build a break-out Board that allows simple connections between the modules PXI and the number of Test B system which we have or will have in our laboratory. In order to simplify the configuration/installation, I want to reduce the number of connections to terminal block screw. Preferably, I would like to completely remove the screw terminals and use lever-based connections where I can't have mating of the headers. The PXI-2632 terminal blocks unfortunately use Terminal screw.

  In matrix mode 8 X 16, the closing of the PXI-2530 switch kcom1, 3, 5, 7, no matter what points in the array are connected. A link between the row of right and column C is done by closing the switch corresponding to k (16R-C). I checked using the Soft Front Panel.

  I also have a number of connector PXI-2630 blocks. These are intended to be used with the switch module in one of its MUX modes and include 8 banks of connections of the header 2 X 9 pins. In the the 2530 documentation and 2630, I identified that switch k-x is associated to chX output pin, ch0-15 related to the pins 1-16 from Bank 0, C16 - 31-associated pins 1-16 of Bank 1, etc.. X = 16 B + P-1. PIN 18 of each bank is used for independent MUX topology comX. Pines multiplexes sixteen seem to correspond to the sixteen columns of the matrix, with eight common lines corresponding to eight lines.

  Here's what I would do, but I would like to ping the forum to see if anyone tried something similar and wisdon to share the thought:

  • Make custom cables which connect the pins 1-16 of all eight banks 2630's header with a single Ribbon connections 16 son carrying the signals emitted by the interconnected banks (poles!).
  
  
  • The custom cable bundle will also include a wire connected to the pin18 of each of the eight banks (line connections!)
  
  
  • 24 total wires in the harness will end in the header connections who will probably partner by the lines that I currently connect to each object to be measured.
  
  
  • Make additional harnesses that interface with the Test System B header pins.
  
  
  • Make a map of derivation using band Council or a similar material to provide header pins to connect the two above custom cables and allow the connection of other elements such as resistors using Terminal level.

  I checked this concept using the Assembly of 176 pins four terminals, like a bunch of little pieces of wire and cable. Are there other issues that I have to configure, such as the elements of a terminal that establish physical components of the switching topologies? The bowels of the PXI-2632 provide more features than the interconnection of the sets of eight sixteen pins? The bowels of the PXI-2630 connect elements that do not allow my proposed scheme?

  I appreciate the suggestions and all entries!

  Thank you

  Jeff Zola

  Hi Jeff,

  First a correction to my previous post: 2632 Terminal has no reed relay protection resistors as I said earlier. The resistance that you were referring to the 2632 and those that I confused, is there to connect the columns of the switch. Resistances have a resistance value zero and act as the electrical connections. The 2632 connects columns c0 to c16, c17 c1, c2 to c18 and so on. Switch cards 2531 and 2532 have the protection relay reed on board resistors.

  As for resistance in the map that protect the reed relays, they are generally very low and do not significatly affect even small tensions that pass through the switch. The resistance won't affect all currents in the map. Any effect that the resistors have on tensions will be with the precision of the switch card specifications.

  Thus, to address the other issue in your post, there is no resistance in the connectors because they are not necessary.

• REST error response, the BODY data include

  I use the REST Web Service to build an API for a few screws

  I want to do the following:

  1. If an error occurs, then change the answer as it is '500' or some non-OK answer.
  2. Include error information in the return data (error code, etc.)

  I have 1 above by composing the response Code of HTTP Set VI.  However, when I do this I am not able to return data (the body is empty).

  Is there a way to return data while also affecting the response code to a non-OK response?

  If this isn't the case, then I must always return '200 OK', even if the errors occur and enter an error for each transaction data structure.

  To close the loop on this one.  If anyone is interested in the follow-up to this request for Corrective Action, the number is 400778.

  A work around for this problem is to use the output mode of flow rather than mode output Terminal.  This will allow you to write a response and set the code.

  KiraT

• Techniques need more details 4250XL IPS and IPS-4255

  4250XL IDS launched before the IPS technology, am I right?

  Can I deploy a 4250XL ID as an IPS, if yes, then it's true to upgrade this version IDS 4.1 to IPS ver 5.0

  I add 4 10/100/1000BaseT ports on ID 4250XL.

  Because, I have to deploy IPS to 1 Gbps throughput.

  and I could not find an IPS in CISCO will produce 1 Gbit/s with 4-port 10/100/1000BaseT.

  How many simultaneous sessions support IPS 4200 series.

  How can I use feature Redundant Power Supply on IPS-4255.

  Technical documentation 42xx is linked off the coast of http://www.cisco.com/go/ips. I don't know if IPS 5.0 information is still (it's kinda new). There is no option RPS for the 4240/4255, but recommends the use of a UPS would be justified for packaging line if you have unreliable power.

  There is no provision for failover in the transducer (other than the bypass mode), but there are drawings (I hope bound off the page that I mentioned above) to do network active / standby designs.

  The 4240 and 4255 do not have redundant storage... they have no HDD due to reliability problems. They run a flash and ram disk configuration.

• New on IDM

  Hello

  I'm new IDM

  We have an ASA 5520 with module 10 IPS.

  I wanted to know how the traffiic will sink in & out

  My thoughts: from the outside Internet > IPS > FW > LAn

  is it good?

  Hello

  Well, you can configure the IPS module of the asa cli only. It is based on the desired mode. promiscous or inline.

  If you configure mode promiscous a copy of the package is sent to the module AIP-SSM-10, in this case it will act as IDS.

  If you configure in inline mode, then the traffic comes from inside and outside the ASA interface, then it will be sent to the module AIP-SSM-10, but do not forget to configure "bypass mode on.

  load will always be there on the firewall because the module is integrated.

  and he has to transfer traffic to the module.

  hope that your doubt is cleared.

• SNMP request Byspass State (AIP5)

  I want to monitor the status of the method of derivation for the ASA-SSC-AIP-5 and would like to know if I can check this with SNMP, and if so, what OID.

  I started playing with SNMP and the SSC5 at the time and a thread on snmpwalk causing it to crash.  After that, I never really took the project upwards.

  I've been known to every now and then don't miss what is obvious, but I was disappointed to see that it was not an (obvious) way for the device to alert when it automatically goes into bypass mode.  This should be a feature request.

  IPS provides SNMP traps for the conditions of different interface as link goes downwards or upwards, bypass traffic started, etc. Here is an example

  Received SNMPv2c Trap: Community: "public" From: 10.89.149.204 mib_2.1.3.0 = 38429472 snmpModules.1.1.4.1.0 = ciscoMgmt.138.2.0.1 ciscoMgmt.138.1.3.3.1.3 = 3                      <====    index can be mapped to index obtained from snmpwalk ciscoMgmt.138.1.3.3.1.4 = 5                      <====    Traffic bypass started ciscoMgmt.138.1.3.3.1.5 = 4 ciscoMgmt.138.1.3.3.1.6 = 38429472

  All you need to do is activate sending traps to the probe.

  QSSP-8085 (config) # notification service

  QSSP-8085(config-not) # enable - set - get true

  QSSP-8085(config-not) # true enable notification

  QSSP-8085(config-not) # public read-only community

  QSSP-8085(config-not) # private read-write community

  destinations of interruptions x.x.x.x QSSP-8085(config-not) #.<===== trap="">

  output QSSP-8085(config-not-tra) #.

  output QSSP-8085(config-not) #.

  You can configure the name of the community separated under trap destination. If not supplied, then the reading-writing-community will be used to send with the trap.

  Hope this helps

  Madhu

• Scan engine is not running

  Hi guys!

  I m looking for your help on a problem with a Cisco IPS (B-BEAUTIFUL) which shows the analytical engine= keep

  Here are the CG and the Version of my IPS:

  Version: 7.0 (6) E4

  OS version: 2.4.30 - IDS-smp-bigphys

  If I run the show events command I get the following lines:

  CT - sensorApp.650 does not

  evStatus: eventId = 1326914865100530240 = Cisco vendor

  Author:

  hostId: XXXXXXXX

  appName: modprobe

  appInstanceId:

  time: 2013/07/13 02:11:05 2013/07/12 20:11:05 is

  syslogMessage:

  Description: Note: /etc/modules.conf is newer than /lib/modules/2.4.30-IDS-smp-bigphys/modules.dep

  The following lines show the result of the show status command:

  See health XXXXXX #.

  Global Health Status Red

  Health for applications failed Red

  Health status for the updates of Signature not enabled

  Health status of license key Expiration Red

  Health for Red running in Bypass Mode

  Health for the Interfaces to the low red

  Health for the Green load control

  Health for the time since the last recovery of the event not enabled

  Health for the green number of missed packets

  Health status for the use of the memory not enabled

  State of health of overall correlation not activated

  State of health for network Participation not enabled

  Decision of sensor vs0 virtual Green

  Decision of sensor vs1 virtual Green

  Do you have an idea of what's not here?

  I'll appreciate any help on this matter,

  Thank you people!

  Hi, manual,.

  Versions pre - 7.0.8 have problems with the latest signature updates, so more that probably you will face this problem after each update of the signature. Then I suggest you spend at least 7.0.8 or 7.1.7.

  HTH

  Luis Silva

  "If you need IDP (planning, design, implementation) assistance do not hesitate to join.

  http://www.Cisco.com/Web/partners/tools/pdihd.html

• Dynamic independent UI tab

  Hello gurus,

  I'm new in the adf and the use of 11.1.2.3. I use dynamic UI tab to open the sub modules. I allowed to open multiple instance unique task as dynamic tab flow, but the question is if make some kind of research on a single instance of the tab, it also reflects on the other instance. I want these two instance of the same workflow must be separate and independent. I added the sub as adf jar modules.

  Any suggestion...

  Thank you

  This task flows have isolated mode (does not control the call of the workflow data).

  Take a look at behavior--> Transaction