Keyword questions

Similar Questions

• 'this' keyword question

  function {employee (age, salary)

  Define dynamic instance variables

  This.Age = age;

  This.Salary = salary;

  }

  I see that the 'this' keyword is used to add a dynamic property to the instantiated object.

  My question is that I also saw the following code.

  function {employee (age, salary)

  Define dynamic instance variables

  _age = age;

  _salary = salary;

  }

  What is the difference, or is it a question of preference or the naming convention?

  Thank you

  It's preferences of conventions, and it is not.

  With regard to the parameters of class vs functions scopes properties go, I prefer the variables name bearing the same names for reasons of continuity.

  In all cases, the use of this is needed, of course, when it is used the same names.

  Also, I prefer convention when _variableName is used only for the private variables that have accessors (getters/setters) correspondents. In all other cases, I use just-mixed-case.

  However, in some situations, we have flexibility.

  For example, let's say we have class:

  package
  {
  
            public class SuperClass
            {
                      private var _age:Number;
                      private var _salary:Number;
                      public function SuperClass()
                      {
  
                      }
  
                      public function employee(age:Number, salary:Number):void {
                                _age = age;
                                _salary = salary;
                      }
  
                      public function get age():Number
                      {
                                return _age;
                      }
  
                      public function set age(value:Number):void
                      {
                                _age = value;
                      }
  
                      public function get salary():Number
                      {
                                return _salary;
                      }
  
                      public function set salary(value:Number):void
                      {
                                _salary = value;
                      }
  
            }
  
  }
  

  In the superclass, the scope has access to _age and _salary directly even if they are private. So - there is no need to use accessors directly.

  Now here's a a class that extends the superclass:

  package
  {
            public class ExtendingClass extends SuperClass
            {
  
                      public function ExtendingClass()
                      {
  
                      }
  
                      public function employee2(age:Number, salary:Number):void
                      {
                                this.age = age;
                                this.salary = salary;
                      }
  
            }
  
  }
  

  This class doesn't have access to _age and _salary because they are private but the accessors are available. Therefore, we SHOULD use the "this" keyword

  Above examples are not very practical but similar situations pop up constantly.

• Keyword question-how do mass you remove/change

  My workflow has changed because I have used the program and as such, my keyword process has changed as well.  I've been unsuccessful in changing/deleting of a key word on several files at the same time.  My current method:

  Select multiple files in a LIBRARY/FILM mode

  Select the Sync metadata button

  In the KEYWORDS section, add a Word

  It works very well for the addition, but if I select one of the words and delete it or change it, it don't not remove/change the word, he says just what I'm typing.

  Is there an easier way this vice file-by-file select/delete-change?

  You can make changes in mass of keywords in the keywords Panel. But you need the pictures selected in the library grid view - not in the film. Perhaps it is also the key to why your method of synchronization does not work for you. I know, it looks like a selection of several photos in the film must be the same by selecting them in the grid view, but it does not work like that.

  This approach is very taxing to the Lightroom Catalog, so I found that I have to be careful. Allow Lightroom finish ' accumulated metadata "before making a change. Make sure that you are using the "Add keywords". If you delete a keyword, make sure that you click in the keyword text entry box after deleting it also that the deletion can't.

  A change in this interactive mode can kick off a large number of database transactions if you let finish before you make another change.

  I used to use ACDSee Pro and the only way to change the metadata on more than one image was to use their synchronization tool. Adobe has been brave to allow users to directly.

• Hello experts, I use Adobe forms in SAP. My question is, is there a any restriction for additem keyword in JavaScript? I mean, even if I use the keyword additem to add the name and value of a drop-down list, it adds up to 10000 files only. Please s

  Hello experts,

  I use Adobe Forms in SAP.

  My question is, is there a any restriction for additem keyword in JavaScript?

  I mean, even if I use the keyword additem to add the name and value of a drop-down list, it adds up to 10000 files only.

  Please sugest

  A drop-down list is the bad INTERFACE design where an element can contain more than 100 entries. It is very good in tests, but absolutely unacceptable if the form must be used by a person busy doing their work. The choice of Acrobat forms are limited, but consider a list box. Despite this, there may be limits imposed by the system or the implementation.

  Better would be

  (a) stop filling after awhile the list and add an entry saying several elements not shown, running report or use better filter

  (b) be available for all filtering of course lists

• Question of hierarchy for the keyword Lightroom 3

  I use primairly LR3 to follow the architectural photographs with many different style or maintained by keyword type designations.  A hierarchy of keywords can be Tudor > (included under the Tudor) symmetrical > Gabled (included in Tudor).  Often, I'll print contact sheets that include key words displayed in the form of photo information.  On what seems to be a completely random basis print keywords may or may not include the entire hierarchy.

  If I check Gabled include in/under Tudor I can have printed on my board contact Gabled > Tudor or just Gables.  Never is it same rest forever.  Certain keywords, symmetrical say can print as symmetrical > Tudor and always will do.  I can redo the keyword (remove and replace), and it may or may not contain the hierarchy now.

  Random action must be something I am or don't do, but have you tried thousands of times to get a consistent result with no luck.  My library of architecture has more than 126 k photos.  I used LR since the first version beta and been able to resolve or understand recent questions (if Adobe or mine).  This question has me and there appear to be no questions and answers on the subject (probably few people rely on the ability to print a string of keyword).  And Yes, there are several workaround solutions, but not how I should approach.

  Anyone, please?

  LR will only show the hierarchy of keywords if the keyword exists more than once in your list of keywords. If you have one "Gabled" keyword in the list, you will see only "Gabled" in your photo info.

  Marc

• Question: smart album with no keywords

  Hello

  I keep my pictures organized by keywords.

  When organizing my library in iPhoto, I used a smart album named any keyword with condition 'keyword is not.

  Is there a way to do this in Photos?

  It seems there is no option to 'none '.

  Thank you

  There is no documented option to create an album smart wih "keyword is not".

  You can use a work cycle: rename all of your keywords to start with a fixed prefix "k::" or similar.  And search for photos with "text does not include" k:: "to find the photos without keywords."

• Question of hierarchy of keywords

  I created and imported a list of hierarchical keywords for Lightroom ensure the consistency of the tags of images on several computers and users. It works on Mac, but on PC, keywords that are higher in the hierarchy do not as they should be. For example, the tag Studio is put in place to apply the tag location as well when applied to an image, but it's not to do so. Any ideas?

  For example, the tag Studio is put in place to apply the tag location as well when applied to an image, but it's not to do so.

  Under Windows, take a test image and apply the keyword of Studio.  Then, in the Keywording Panel in the right-hand column of the library, the value Keyword Tags enter in keywords.  Studio must only show:

  

  Then, replace Keyword Tags keywords keywords & container.  Now the Studio and location should indicate:

  

  Finally, replace Keyword Tags Will Export.  Now, the Studio and location should indicate:

  

  If the location does not show, it means that one of the export of Studio or location attributes is undefined.  In the keyword list, double-click Studio - export containing keywords is set?  Now, double-click on location - is include on export set?

• Question on keywords

  I'm transition to use ACDSee for Lightroom 6.  ACDSee, keywords, also it called categories, which can be an expression.  For example, I have photos with an assign category to them like 123 Elm Street (i.e. photos of a House at this address.  I can import this category in a LR keyword, but with a phrase like this, I'm looking for a recommendation for how to handle such a situation.  If I use 123 Elm Street as keywords, they be treated as separate words, which is not what I think I want to.

  Any suggestion would be appreciated.

  Thank you.

  msfox1 wrote:

  ... are you saying that in the window create the tag keyword, multi-word expression is treated as a Word?

  Yes, the multi-word expression is treated as a keyword.

• Question of Keywords in Lightroom5

  Ran across a problem with keywords in Lightroom 5 and asked if anyone had some advice. When I export an image with existing keywords they showup in the properties of the file when I open the new image in Windows Explorer. When I re - import this new file in Lightroom, I find that none of the original keywords are visible. This had not been a problem in previous versions of Lightroom - I was wondering what is happening here.

  Thanks for any help in advance!

  Kevin

  The most likely cause is that you use a metadata preset that is inadvertently removing key words.

  Let us know if we are barking the wrong tree.

  Tony Jay

• Keyword export question

  I have four levels of keywords and wanted to export / print the text.  Export seems to descend three levels?  Can someone try and tell me I'm bad / mad / wrong.

  They are similar to the

  1. the people

  1.1 family

  1.1.1 family Johns

  1.1.1.1 Mary

  1.1.1.2 Fred

  1.1.1.3 Andrew

  1.1.2 family of Sues

  1.1.2.1 xxx

  1.2 friends

  ....

  You get the idea (BTW the numbers aren't in my keywords, text only)

  Thank you Gary

  4.3 LR with windows 7 64 bit... will try again this evening when I'm home

• Simple question about synonyms for the keyword

  I've never used synonyms of the keyword until tonight, and LR4 help isn't much help. It shows you how to add a synonym, but it doesn't tell you how to use a synonym.

  I have a keyword called "railway bridges". I have change the key word to include the synonym RRBridge and then save the new definition of the keyword.

  Then, I expected to be able to enter the synonym RRBridge in the keywords Panel and recognized him and assign the keyword "Railway bridges" in this photo.

  Did not work. Nuh - uh. Created a new RRBridge, distinct and different keyword from the keyword "railway bridges". That is not what I wanted, and is not what I expected.

  So, exactly how do you use synonyms for the keyword?

  They are not really for entering data, as you found, but are applied to the image when you export - see you in the view Will Export in the keywords Panel. They are also available via smart collections and searchable text of the Group Filter tab.

• A question about keywords

  Is it possible in the settings... or somewhere, so that when you open Organizer (of PrE9) rather than start with a list of hierarchy of keywords - it could open to keyword cloud poster? I'm not too keen on the method of hierrarchy...

  Thank you.

  brush

  I had some experiences in the organizer of 9 elements.

  1 - Yes, when you close the Organizer , and he always seems to come next time with the grid of the miniature AND the Panel tags on the right is defined on the view hierarchy. Then, you click on the view of the cloud icon.

  2. my conclusion is that if I click on the cloud icon after the Organizer starts, then it was stay like clouds in the Panel tags keyword to the right of the thumbnails for the duration that the Organizer is open.

  3 - Note If you use the Mode full-screen to view your photos and then for the Panel "Organize quick" which is dragged to the left side of the screen to the bottom, the default value for the keyword tags Cloud. This is another method of work which you may or may not like: However, because it does not define cloud I decided to mention it.

  FYI - for full screen, you can use the drop icon display (it's next to the Home icon on the bar at the top of the main screen of organizer). Choose the option "View, Edit, organize in full screen.  FYI - I usually select the thumbnails of the photos I want to organize before moving mode full-screen.

• A few simple questions about keyword Meta Tags? Help, please

  (1) is it better to put spaces after commas in meta keyword tags? example of black, yellow, blue or black, yellow, blue--> no spaces?

  (2) every page on your site wib to contain keywords? If so, should they be the same keywords?

  (3) If a keyword has two words in there, it's beter to separate them in the meta tag? example "Laurelwood inn, Bellwood inn" or "Laurelwood, Bellwood, Inn" - >

  (4) LETTERS are important to search engines?

  (5) been to all web resources free good that teach how to get higher rankings on the search engines?

  Thanks in advance!

  Hey dude

  Every page on your site must contain relevant keywords. Not only spammed it however.

  What meta tag do you use...? 'Meta keyword tag' was so hard that google is not really recognize most spammed. Some say that Yahoo still therefore address the issue. I would focus more on the 'meta description' and 'title tags'.

  Look in the different types of keywords for example longtail and short tail, I think that longtail would be preferable.

  Capital letters should be used for structure of the content, the same way that normally use you.

  Start by downloading the first pdf on this page, this will help you.

  http://www.Google.com/support/webmasters/bin/answer.py?hl=en&answer=35291

  A little tip is to make the content of your Web site first, then optimize, you don't want that a boring doesn't do much site feel well optimized. A common mistake that people make attempts to satisfy search engines too so oblivion of their clients.

• Question Lightroom keyword

  Greetings. I use the 64-bit version of LR3.3 on Windows 7, but I had this problem since the upgrade. I have a long list of keywords. I find if I develop my keywords keyword to the low third list are not selectable, even though it shows how many photos is marked with them. If I open a metadata filter and scroll down to the bottom of my keyword column I get the same results. However, if I do a search and specify a key word in this way it will bring up the photos. I have not found anything in the forums regarding this issue. Does anyone have any suggestions?

  Thank you.

  I read somewhere on this forum that there is a problem with long lists. I had to do with the quantity maximum lines that can, but put in a window. You can to the nesting of use (continued) key words.

• Add keywords?

  Heyas... !

  It is currently possible to search using keyword bookmarks in Firefox mobile? I mean the bookmarks that link to a URL with a '%s' in what is replaced by your search...

  For example, I may have a bookmark pointing to "http://stackoverflow.com/search?q=%s" with the set of keywords of "so"... So on desktop Firefox, I can get Stack Overflow by typing in ' question about the programming if some ' in the Awesome bar and pressing [Enter].

  But as far as I know, they are unusable in Firefox mobile. Y at - it an option that I'm missing?

  Thank you.. !

  If you use Firefox Sync , you can synchronize the bookmarks with search by keyword for Firefox for Android and they work as expected.