Question of hierarchy of keywords

Similar Questions

• Question of hierarchy for the keyword Lightroom 3

  I use primairly LR3 to follow the architectural photographs with many different style or maintained by keyword type designations.  A hierarchy of keywords can be Tudor > (included under the Tudor) symmetrical > Gabled (included in Tudor).  Often, I'll print contact sheets that include key words displayed in the form of photo information.  On what seems to be a completely random basis print keywords may or may not include the entire hierarchy.

  If I check Gabled include in/under Tudor I can have printed on my board contact Gabled > Tudor or just Gables.  Never is it same rest forever.  Certain keywords, symmetrical say can print as symmetrical > Tudor and always will do.  I can redo the keyword (remove and replace), and it may or may not contain the hierarchy now.

  Random action must be something I am or don't do, but have you tried thousands of times to get a consistent result with no luck.  My library of architecture has more than 126 k photos.  I used LR since the first version beta and been able to resolve or understand recent questions (if Adobe or mine).  This question has me and there appear to be no questions and answers on the subject (probably few people rely on the ability to print a string of keyword).  And Yes, there are several workaround solutions, but not how I should approach.

  Anyone, please?

  LR will only show the hierarchy of keywords if the keyword exists more than once in your list of keywords. If you have one "Gabled" keyword in the list, you will see only "Gabled" in your photo info.

  Marc

• Hierarchy of keywords problem

  I just started using hierarchies of keywords.  After creating my first one from the 'location', I find that trying to create a new (like 'animals') the place in the hierarchy of the keyword "rental."  So how to create a new hierarchy that stands alone?  To create the first hierarchy, I used the symbol '+' at the top of the list of key words.  When I use the '+' again once, to create a new keyword, it automatically places under the hierarchy of 'Location' (even if I don't count whether a hierarchy).

  Right click on the key word "rental".

  Then uncheck "Put new keywords inside of this keyword"

  Default keyword location is noted by a sign more/asterisk following the keyword name. (sign for regular keywords/asterisk for keywords people)

• Question of hierarchy CSS Viewer

  Hello

  I have an Application of Web merger under Jdeveloper 12 c that gets the colors and the butchering of a CSS file.

  When I add:

  AF | DVT-hierarchyViewer

  {

  background-image:-webkit-linear-gradient(bottom, #FFFFFF 0%, #000000 300%).

  background-color: currentColor;

  background-attachment: scroll;

  }

  to my CSS file and run my application, the hierarchy opens with a grey color but it then displays back to the blue gradient slight defect of fusionFx-simple - v2.desktop as soon as it.

  But if I change these settings on the hierarchy itself, the color changes to grey and it remains grey.

  Any help with this will be appreciated

  The Preez Stefan

  Hello

  Looks like a bug because af | DVT-hierarchyViewer works on the same level as the inlineStyle property. Please send test case would be for me directly. All mail to frank nimphius oracle com. put the unit test in a zip file and rename the file extension to "decompress."

  Frank

• How can I show only images with the tag specific higher in the hierarchy of keywords, not including sublevels?

  I use a lot the hierarchical keywords.  For example, the location of the World/Europe/Austria/Tirol/specific.  I sometimes attribute only a top-level keyword (example: Austria) of an image when I don't know any more details.  How can I show only the images that have the label that I select, but not those with levels of basements for this keyword?  Exactly as the choice in folders view to examine only a folder selected, but not subfolders.  There could be a complicated way to implement a smart collection that includes a keyword, but excludes images with more that this number of keywords, but that could be really intensive work.

  It's easy, but fairly obscure: in the library filter bar, select the keyword column.  Click on the 'Properties' button on the right, and then select display: flat.  Now painfully, scroll through the list and select the desired keyword:

  

• Question of hierarchy OBIEE 10 g

  Hi all
  
  
  I created a hierarchy (manually) in OBIEE 10 years G Level.For example, quarter, month, and day.
  
  All are workinig fine, but when break through us year quarter, it will take at the level of the child. Yet once the level of the year presents hyperlink in the cumulative process.
  
  I want yet rollup at the level of the year.
  
  Can you help me please on this.
  
  Thank you
  Sunil

  Take a good look and this expected behavior.
  Suppose that you pulled the year and click on it
  Quarter of the year
  both get hyperlink
  If you click on the year
  Year months Qtr

  If you click Qtr in above cases
  Year months Qtr

  Hope this is clear.

  Check if help

• question of hierarchy for the post w_position_dh

  trying to understand w_position_dh. I'm looking for subordinate employee to Olivier 7.9.6.2 direct analytical hr?
  
  The issue is less than
  
  Employee X is a Manager and he promoted to the new position and now reports to employee and Y. X has some direct reports(ex:a,b,c). Since a, b, c are reports related to X and X to Y, so we expect a, b, c are indirect reports to Y.
  Y->
  X >
  a, b, c
  
  in the framework of w_position_dh a, b, c are missing for employee Y.
  
  How can I solve the above problem.
  
  
  Thank you
  Jay.
  
  Published by: JV123 on August 15, 2012 13:53
  
  Published by: JV123 on August 15, 2012 14:02

  Is used is the BASE used? You see employee X and when you find the folder that used the base? Make sure you look at the hierarchy correctly as BASIC is the LOWEST.

  In addition, if you are looking to him properly and and there is a problem, there was a problem w POSITION does not change reflected and a PATCH attached.

  If this was helpful, please mark as correct or useful.

• Question of hierarchy

  Hi all
  
  I have 4 fact table that are joined to different dimensions, in order to avoid the circular joints I created aliases table dim and used in layer MDB.
  
  One dimension is used as a dim hierarchy.
  So should I create the hierarchy even for the alias... so that it can used the fact table measures, he was joined.
  
  
  Kind regards
  Megha
  
  Published by: 913302 on February 17, 2012 14:29

  Hello

  You can avoid to create aliases and make a duplicate of the dimension in the MDB layer and join to the fact table and create a hierarchy.

  Kind regards
  Young

• Question of hierarchy of Inline elements

  Hello

  There is an API in IHierarchy-> GetSpreadUID() which returns spread uid.

  
  I have a boss of inline element and I asked IHierarchy on it so I called GetSpreadUID() to get the uid spread but the returned UID is kInvalidUID.
  Anyone will provide more insight about this behavior?

  TIA.

  < <"Ask a stranger and him say,"who knows what knows a foreigner?" . > >

  kInlineBoss in the kSpreadBoss hierarchy, is no model of kTextStoryBoss strand.

  kTextStoryBoss is not in the hierarchy of the kSpreadBoss also.

  You can not spreadUID of kInlineBoss or inline page elements.

• Another question of hierarchy

  Hi all
  
  I have the sample data below
  

  create table t1 
  (
    parent_id varchar2(200),
    child_id varchar2(200)
   
  );
   
  insert into t1
    (parent_id, child_id)
  values
    ('P1', 'C1');
   
   
  insert into t1
    (parent_id, child_id)
  values
    ('P2', 'C2');
    
    
  insert into t1
    (parent_id, child_id)
  values
    ('C1', 'D1');
   
   
   
  insert into t1
    (parent_id, child_id)
  values
    ('D1', 'D2');
    
    
    
    insert into t1
    (parent_id, child_id)
  values
    ('D1', 'D3');
   
   
   
    insert into t1
    (parent_id, child_id)
  values
    ('D3', 'D4');
    
      insert into t1
    (parent_id, child_id)
  values
    ('D3', 'D5');

  I need to determine the last parent_id of a child_id... so, for example if we child_id = D4, then its last parent is P1
  
  How can I do this?
  
  I have written something so far, but will need help to finish it.
  

  SELECT child_id, parent_id
     FROM t1
   START WITH child_id = 'D4'
   CONNECT BY PRIOR child_id = parent_id;

  Any help is appreciated. Thank you.

  Something like this:

    1  select parent_id
    2  from
    3  (
    4  SELECT child_id, parent_id, row_number() over (order by parent_id desc) rn
    5     FROM t1
    6   START WITH child_id='D4'
    7  connect by prior parent_id=child_id
    8  )
    9* where rn = 1
  SQL> /
  
  PARENT_ID
  -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  P1
  

• 5.3 in Keywords Lightroom hierarchy.

  I use Lightroom 5.3 on Win7 x 64. I'm having some problem during the hierarchy of keywords.

  As indicated in A, sometimes he's on full auto but as shown B several times it doesn't no and manual entry is required. People have the mention on the adobe forum, that he should not work but his works sometimes.

  Someone at - it had the same problem. -How do you manage even?

  

  In general, when there is only a single keyword with a given journal name, LR will remove the ancestor keyword when you fill the car and displaying the keyword.  In your example, there are two keywords with the name "AEPL" sheet, so when you type the keyword AutoComplete will give you the choice to choose between the keywords ("' AEPL < places"="" and="" "aepl=""> < people"). ="" but="" since="" there="" is="" just="" one="" keyword="" with="" the="" leaf="" name="" "flower"="" ("flower=""> < style"),="" lr="" supresses="" the="" ancestors=""> < style").  ="" but="" when="" you="" enter="" "flower",="" you="" are="" in="" fact="" selecting="" the="" keyword="" "flower=""> < style".  ="" you="" can="" verify="" this="" by="" selecting="" the="" image's="" thumbnail="" and="" then="" examing="" the="" keyword="" list="" pane="" --="" you'll="" see="" that="" "style=""> Flower" has a check next to him. ")

• Confusion of keyword hierarchy?

  I get very confused regarding the conduct of a hierarchy of keywords to export.

  For example, let's say I have the following hierarchy;

  People

  ↑ family

  ↑ Botella

  If I tag photo with 'Joe Bloggs', I would expect 'people', 'family' keywords and Joe Bloggs to export, correct?

  Now, for the confusion...

  In the options key word for 'people', 'export containing keywords' I checked. This means that all the photos with the keyword tag 'people' will also have the keywords 'family' and 'Joe Bloggs' added to them?

  I tried, and it doesn't seem to be the case. So, what is the purpose of "export containing keywords?

  Any help would be appreciated!

  Thank you very much

  Martin

  The word "container" is obviously what is confusing you.

  This means that the keywords above in the hierarchy. Given that the family goes beyond of Joe Bloggs, if you check "Export the words containing" family gets exported. If you check not 'export words containing' then the family does NOT get exported.

  Can someone explain in simple terms what 'export containing keywords' means? Particularly "containing"? In the above example, 'people' contains 'family' and 'Joe Bloggs', if it does not mean those that contain keywords for export, does that mean?

  In your example, contains is not the same as the container. In fact, they are opposed. A cereal box of rice krispies. What is container puffed rice? The box containing the puffed rice.

• A question about keywords

  Is it possible in the settings... or somewhere, so that when you open Organizer (of PrE9) rather than start with a list of hierarchy of keywords - it could open to keyword cloud poster? I'm not too keen on the method of hierrarchy...

  Thank you.

  brush

  I had some experiences in the organizer of 9 elements.

  1 - Yes, when you close the Organizer , and he always seems to come next time with the grid of the miniature AND the Panel tags on the right is defined on the view hierarchy. Then, you click on the view of the cloud icon.

  2. my conclusion is that if I click on the cloud icon after the Organizer starts, then it was stay like clouds in the Panel tags keyword to the right of the thumbnails for the duration that the Organizer is open.

  3 - Note If you use the Mode full-screen to view your photos and then for the Panel "Organize quick" which is dragged to the left side of the screen to the bottom, the default value for the keyword tags Cloud. This is another method of work which you may or may not like: However, because it does not define cloud I decided to mention it.

  FYI - for full screen, you can use the drop icon display (it's next to the Home icon on the bar at the top of the main screen of organizer). Choose the option "View, Edit, organize in full screen.  FYI - I usually select the thumbnails of the photos I want to organize before moving mode full-screen.

• How to revise the new hierarchy list of keywords

  My list of keywords present is simply a list of words with no hierarchy. After have exported them to a text file, it was noted that many simple words have brackets around them, for example [cat] rather than cat simply.  -What happened? Can I delete my current list and import a list of "clean"? How can I create a hierarchy with my current list?  Refers to a manual or a tutorial would be great. Thank you.

  If you have a list of words with no hierarchy, like the one below:

  Geography

  Europe

  Italy

  Campagnia

  Vesuvius

  Naples

  Pompeii

  If you export the keyword list to a file and modify the hierarchy as follows:

  Geography
  Europe
  Italy
  Campagnia
  Vesuvius
  Naples
  Pompeii

  everything would be fine if you did not have all the photos associated with these keywords initially, but if all keywords in the simple list of keywords were already associated with the photos, then after importing the list of keywords, the keywords in Lightroom would appear as follows:

  Geography

  Geography
  Europe
  Italy
  Campagnia
  Vesuvius
  Naples
  Pompeii

  Europe

  Italy

  Campagnia

  Vesuvius

  Naples

  Pompeii

  This is because Lightroom stores the path full of a hierarchy of keywords when this keyword is associated with a picture.

  Based on the above hierarchy, the keyword "Pompeii" can be associated with a picture in the following way:

  Pompei > Campagnia > Italy > Europe > geography

  or

  Pompeii

  So if you already have photos that have the keyword "Pompeii" linked from the list of words, this keyword is different from the key word "Pompeii > Campagnia > Italy > Europe > geography" and there is not all the photos associated with the latter.

  That said, if a hierarchy should be changed, it is best to do in Lightroom itself, by drag-and - drop and not not not doing an import/export the list of keywords.

  Note also that during the consideration of the hierarchies of keywords, it is preferable to assign only the keyword which is located at the bottom of the hierarchy to your photos, such as those above will be automatically inherited.

  In regards to the brackets around key words when you export a list of keywords, they mean the following:

  [Brackets] around a keyword means that the "include on export" is unchecked in the options of the keyword in the keyword tags. This keyword will not appear in the export of photos that have that keyword associated with them. The other special character used is between braces {} that define synonyms for a keyword. A hierarchy is simply defined by adding a tab for each level of the hierarchy.

  Here is an example:

  [geography] - this keyword will not be included in a exported pictures (its purpose is just to organize the hierarchy)

  Europe

  Italy

  Campagnia

  Vesuvius

  Naples

  Pompeii

  Sport - although this key word is also for the Organization of the hierarchy.

  It is more valuable and I decided that it should export with pictures

  running
  3km
  5km
  first race
  half marathon
  Football
  {Soccer} - this is a synonym for the word football

  If the square brackets [] have nothing to do with the hierarchy; It simply indicates the weather you want this keyword as exportable or not.

  Finally, a good use of the keyword import/export list is to add or remove these brackets, add synonyms for keywords existing, or add new keywords to the hierarchy, but NOT to change an existing hierarchy or create one based on the existing keywords.

  I hope this helps!

• Keywords in the Keywording Panel duplicate

  I have kind of a lack of knowledge about hierarchies of keywords already installed and used.  This issue is going to be less together.

  I will have imported all my photos in Lightroom already.  Their keywords are associated should be in the keyword Panel.  (I him did not yet.)

  Most of the imports, which are keyworded in Nikon View 6.0.0.  (I have not already no flat keywords list or hierarchical keyword list in Nikon View.)  I have these photos in Nikon View IPTC looking at a list of independent paper keyworded.  The rest of the recent photos imported is were keyworded inside Lightroom or Nikon View NX2 keyworded and imported.  [I haven't decided yet who I Lightroom or NX2 keyword... unless you have a suggestion.]

  The hierarchy of words keys will have made upward after that most of my photos have been imported...  In short, I'm trying to give you a future scenario of my workflow at this point so I can start to ask questions.

  I have read of people having problems with keywords in double being added to the Panel keyword list Lightroom after they get their hierarchy/list of keywords in place.  The following reflections on key words in double turn in a hierarchy of keywords, I have read and am not 100% clear on:

  "The problem with the hierarchical keywords is that they always end with key words child somehow reappear at the top level."  There are times when they re - import an image that is processed in another application.  Or when a child keyword group is duplicated in more than one part of the hierarchy.  Often because they changed the hierarchy at one point and imported an older file.  Or they changed the hierarchy on a laptop and then files the main PC.  Something still bothers the logical structure, they put in place.  So rather than continue with this problem, they are returned in a simple list in Lightroom. "

  If someone could mean what is above, so I'm 100% sure I think I know what he says?  Are there cases more I could get an unwanted duplicate keywords or keyword in the Panel?  So it's not a good idea to change the hierarchy after you get it set up?  How about additions?

  I fear now start a hierarchy!  Fear of problems it can cause in the future.  I like the idea, you can filter the search on a whole category or subcategory.  It is easier to zip down to find a keyword.  Especially with the 700 more keywords.  I'm afraid to impliment it.  Could someone explain to me?  Thank you very much for any information!

  Sandy

  Assignment: create a small catalogue with a few files and hierarchy of keywords as show you. Then assign pictures to Celina and some photos to Van Wert (or use any existing hierarchy you) and see what happens.

  Try also braque on the keyword Celina on the right in the list of keywords, and right arrow Panel will appear to the right of the number of photos that appear, click the right arrow.