LAN1-FREEBSD-R1700-R1700-LAN2

LAN1---> FREEBSD<--->R1700<--->R1700<>

It comes to my network

LAN1 10.10.10.10/24

LAN2 192.168.1.0/24

FREEBSD<--->192.168.2.0/24 R1700

R1700<--->R1700 192.168.3.0/24

I use R1700<--->R1700 IPSEC vpn and

access-list 100 Pentecost fine 192.168.3.0 work

But when I add in the access list 100 network 10.10.10.0/24 (lan1) does not work.

FreeBSD is a Firewall (ipfw) that allow only the server HTTP 10.10.10.10 on port 8080.

When stop ipfw and have the ip of any of 10.10.10.10, it works security

which port I have to pass the BSD firewall Ipsec

Hello

This isn't the IPSEC traffic flowing through the BSD firewall. So you must make sure that the IP traffic that needs to travel through the BSD firewall. For example, HTTP on port 8080 is open but what the HTTP on 8080 we start? If it's another type of traffic, then make sure that it is allowed. Is this a PIX firewall, if yes then could you also send the config?

HTH,

* Please note if help.

Kind regards

Kamal

Tags: Cisco Security

Similar Questions

  • iPhone WiFi sharing

    Is it possible to share the connection Wi - Fi (not cell) of a 6 s iPhone more (iOS 9.3.3) to a MacBookPro (retina, mid-2012, i7, 16GB) via USB?

    For some reason, I need the MacBook to connect to two different wi - fi (LAN1 and LAN2) at the same time. As the Mac has only one card wifi network I think that I can connect to LAN1, then iPhone to LAN2 and share the latter for the Mac.

    I have worked with linux/unix/x boxes with multiple NICs before, so I'm familiar with the routing tables and stuff like that. So, once connected to LAN1 and LAN2, addition configuration will not be a problem.

    Thanks in advance.

    As far as I know it is possible to share the cell connection.

    The official support document also means this:

    Share your Internet connection with Personal Hotspot - Apple Support

  • SWITCH Cisco/Linksys SLM224G: Problem with the VLAN

    Hello!

    I'm trying to set up a VLAN in my baskets. I have some knowledge about VLANs, but I still can not configure in my path.

    My situation:

    I have PC that contains two virtual machines, which works as a router between three networks: LAN, WAN, LAN2. It's a bit complicated, but I'll try to draw:

                                                     |-------------||----------------------------|                   |           e1|-to-eth1-VM2-----WAN|VirtualMachine 1        eth0|---trunk-VLAN1&2---|g1         e2|-to-eth0-VM2-----LAN2|eth0=VLAN1 eth1=VLAN2       |                   |           e3|-to-eth0-VM2-----LAN2 etc.|                         PC |                   |   SWITCH  e4||VirtualMachine 2            |                   |           e5|-to-eth1-VM1---wire-to-LAN2|eth0=VLAN3 eth1=VLAN4   eth1|---trunk-VLAN3&4---|g2         e6|-to-eth0-VM1-----LAN1|----------------------------|                   |           e7|-to-eth0-VM1-----LAN1 etc.                                                 |-------------|
    
    gX = Gigabit portseX = 100Mbit portsVMX = Virtual machine numberwire-to = patch-cord connection between ports on the switch
    
    Schema of routing and logical visibility:
    
    LAN1---VM1-----VM2---WAN              |LAN2----------|
    

    Important note is that LAN1 and LAN2 must be separated (visible only through routers). WAN must be visible through VM2 to LAN2 and through by VM1 and VM2 to LAN1. It seems easy, but VLAN that I did on this passage seems doesn't work.

    I do it like this:

    Step 1: Management of VLANS / create a VLAN...

    Creation of VLANS 1, 2, 3, 4 (numbers meters right now - I have now this number 1 is restricted to the switch).

    Step 2: Management of VLAN / Port to VLAN...

    Setting up VLAN1 with ports g1, e5 (the two labelled or not identified?-I have not seen any difference)

    Implementation VLAN2 with ports g1, e6, e7, etc...

    Implementation VLAN3 with ports g2, e2, e3, etc...

    Setting up VLAN4 with g2, e1 ports

    Step 3: Management of VLAN / Port setting...

    Implementation of ports e1 to PVID4 (chassis type = all I guess, but with "capture filter"?)

    Setting up port e2 at PVID3

    Setting up port PVID3 e3

    etc...

    Setting up port e5 for PVID1

    Setting up port e6 at PVID2

    Setting up port e7 for PVID2

    etc...

    Thus, on this configuration and that the switch it does not work for me

    I know that the switch is to see Mac since VLAN which is carried out by PC, because when I arrive in "Admin / dynamic address" I see pimps on the correct ports, with good VLAN ID. So the problem is to transmit a VLAN for their ports, then clear frames of ID and let the packets to go (and return: clear packages, add the VLAN ID and send to their Gigabit ports).

    Show the configuration is one of the many I tried :/ but I think this one is the best.

    Or maybe I don't know VLAN as I think and this scheme is impossible? Please tell me.

    Concerning

    and waiting for any suggestions,

    READ

    Hello.

    These products are processed by the Cisco Small Business Support Community.

    * If my post answered your question, please mark it as "acceptable Solution".

    * Do not forget to give a 'congratulations '. Thank you!

  • Change the type of network "private."

    Hello, I have three NICs in a computer - two LANs and a WiFi adapter.

    LAN1 is the domain network (and correctly apply the firewall domain profile).
    LAN2 is virtualbox virtual card, it is always 'public '. It was not (and are not) all the options to change.
    LAN2 and WiFi are merged in public place 'Networks' unidentified

    How can I move LAN2 location 'private' instead?

    My desired configuration-
    LAN1 stays "domain."
    LAN2 becomes "private".
    WiFi adapter is "public".

    This way I can config adv.firewall using profiles (that is how it should be used, isn't it?). From now on, I have TO use a profile for all locations (public profile), limit all the rules by IP scopes and deactivate all other profiles to avoid confusion.

    The system is 64-bit Windows 7 Professionsl

    Open the network and sharing Center.  Under LAN2, it should say 'Public '.  Click on 'Public' and you should get the option to change in private.

    -B-
    http://www.officeforlawyers.com | http://www.OneNote-tips.com
    Author: Guide to counsel for Microsoft Outlook

  • LAN2 connection for professional Outlook and LAN1 for IE. Possible?

    I use a LAN1 for IE (ADSL) connection, but I lose emails via this provider (I have an e-mail account to another provider).  Some emails are not received by my clients (maybe a leak somewhere).

    So I want to use the internet through LAN1 but I want to send and receive emails via LAN2 (another network).

    But I can choose only a LAN in Outlook, but I can not choose what LAN (probably the same LAN to the internet, both LAN1).

    How can I corrected it (I have Outlook 2003)? Is this fixed in another version? Buy something (tool) to make this possible?

    Hello

    You cannot configure an application to work on two local independent networks, or to ask when working with what.

    If you have two LAN cards and each one is configured for a separate network and both have Internet access. When you're ready to send clear LAN1 and LAN 2 to happen.

    You can create shortcuts on the desktop to activate and deactivate the NICs with a file bat using the ipconfig command, this allows to easily turn on and off, each connection of a double click.

    Jack-MVP Windows Networking. WWW.EZLAN.NET

  • Cisco VCS VCSE H323 Support LAN2 missing

    Hello community,

    After the upgrade VCS to 8.7.1 I see below the H323 config just LAN1 is activated it. I use LAN2 for external connections. So, for this interface, that there is no possible connection with calls H323 1720 from the outside. Have they changed it? There are always two interfaces active in SIP.

    Now they dial-in can´t us on H323 like @.

    Can we do a downgrade and restore the config? Is there a known change? Nothing in the Release Notes.

    Thanks for help.

    Have you tried to call your VCS-E from the outside and to see if it's actually not accessible, or by using SSH check the State of H323 with command: xStatus H323?

    I saw no bug on this topic.  I would downgrade to the previous version you are running, if the second address lan reappears, Sue to get it looked at TAC.  It could be a bug or just a cosmetic problem.

  • Tecra a2: freebsd 5.3 hang at startup

    Hello

    can I use freebsd 5.3 on tecra a2 laptop computer?
    Mode without PTA20E-02F02YPL

    FreeBSD then stops as botting on that line
    PCI0: on pcib0

    I tried to boot without ACPI, safe mode, did not help.

    Hello

    Here are some interesting sites of linux

    http://www.Linux-on-laptops.com

    http://newsletter.toshiba-tro.de/main/index.html

    There are hardware compatibility lists.

    Thanks to Bob :)

    Good bye

  • Satellite M30-113 does not work well when I use FreeBSD 6.2

    Hello

    My M30-113 does not work well when I use FreeBSD 6, 2-RELEASE http://www.FreeBSD.Org/

    I was told that Toshiba has release a new bios to correct the problem of cooling, because it does not allow me to fan passive cooling in FreeBSD.

    So could we have a new bios to solve this issue?

    Arabian salvation

    I am sure that mobile industry is focused on Windows operating system and hardware architecture together and preinstalled software are adapted and also configured to run well and stable.

    This operating system is supported and if something should be better portable manufacturers offer different updates to the BIOS. Of course, you can preinstall what you want but you can not expect support for everything you can find on the market and because of this I n t believe that you won't find any update especially for FreeBSD 6.2 - RELEASE BIOS.

  • Portege R600 - what someone has installed OS FreeBSD

    Hello

    Someone trying to install freebsd on portege r600? BSD recognizes material etc...?
    All the problems? etc...

    Any experience and responses will be appricieated.

    Thank you.

    Hello

    Unfortunately I m not a R600 owner but in my opinion it shouldn't be a problem with the installation the most common devices should be recognized

    But of course you will not be able to install Toshiba special tools and utilities that are designed specifically for the Windows operating system.

    See you soon

  • Satellite U300-111: Linux FreeBSD 6.3 X 11 issue

    Hello

    On my Toshiba U300-111, I installed FreeBSD 6.3. In sysinstall I choice X Windows must be installed as well. After the installation when I tried 'startx', it gave me an error.

    I wonder has anyone else tried to install FreeBSD on their Toshiba laptops lately? Y at - he driver/adapter screen info I need to know. I got the following error:

    (EE) Impossible to load the 'fbdev' module (module exists, 0)
    (WW) I810: No Device corresponding section for instance (BusID PCI:0:2:1) found
    (II) the already built-in "SDC" module
    (EE) VESA (0): no mode corresponding
    (EE) Or screens are, but none has a usable configuration

    Fatal server error:
    no screens found
    Connection to: 0.0 broken (stop explicit kill or server)

    Thank you.

    Hi mate,

    Please visit this site: http://linux.toshiba-dme.co.jp/linux/index.htm

    Here you can find information about linux on laptops. Maybe you should take a look at BSD forums, which should give more information then here, since it is here that Toshiba user forum where people discuss hardware related issues.

    Linux is a little more complicated and you should get a new one for some answers. I had the same problem and I found my answers in Ubuntu and gentoo forums.

    Welcome them

  • Satellite L30 - 113 need view info frequency to use FreeBSD

    I installed on the FreeBSD laptop.
    To start X-Server me meanings necessary frequency range of HorizSync and VertRefresh.

    Please report them

    Hello

    follow these steps:

    Download a knoppix cd, burn it to cd, start and then notice what dmesg/xorg log file is telling on the frequencies that have been set during the boot.

    That's all. :)

    (I have done everything automatically ;)) ubuntu and xorg

    Welcome them

  • Advise me on laptop for FreeBSD

    Advise me on laptop for FreeBSD, pls.
    I want cheapest new laptop with wi - fi.
    I try some selected models, but drivers for freebsd (and linux) away on this site.
    Do you know which model is the most compatible with freebsd (v5)?

    Hello

    Unfortunately, on the page of the Toshiba driver, you will only find drivers for Toshiba laptops and only for Microsoft operating systems.
    It of very difficult to find drivers for laptop for Linux or other systems.

    Especially the laptop factory contains only OS drivers that comes with the laptop clean and as you know it s almost Windows OS.

  • FreeBSD on Cisco UCS C220 or C240

    My question is that if it is possible to install version 10 of OS FreeBSD on a Cisco UCS C200 or C240 server, they are compatible or not?

    Hello

    It might be possible, but does not supported, so I will confine myself to saying:

    He is not here: http://www.cisco.com/web/techdoc/ucs/interoperability/matrix/matrix.html or here http://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en/us/td/docs/unified_computing/ucs/interoperability/matrix/r_hcl_C_rel1-56.pdf

    I may have forgotten, then you want to check the .pdf link again

    -Note THE answers useful.

    Kenny

  • Why not work network after sleep (pfsense VM) based on freeBSD?

    When you resume a computer virtual which has a guest operating system (a gateway and a firewall based on freeBSD), pfsense networking does not work.

    Even if the user interface shows correctly in place of the network interfaces. And the two network interfaces of the gateway that are connected, the WAN one like a usb device (usb-to-ethernet adapter physical network), the LAN as a network card virtual vmnet3 and other virtual machines that use this bridge across vmnet3 look good too.

    What else could be bad due to the recovery, it was well before the last suspended?

    Hello

    UH... Yes the internet USB adapter is indeed likely your culprit, not sure how I missed that in your original post.

    Unfortunately, there are a lot of people having trouble with the USB from one version to the other, and the way that it works is moving.

    Of course, the intention is to better support for USB, but VMware also regularly breaks things in this particular area.

    Back to a version might help.

    There are also a whole bunch of parameters vmx USB change their behavior... and they are mostly undocumented.

    http://FAQ.sanbarrow.com/index.php?action=Artikel&Cat=7&ID=83&artlang=en

    The skipsetConfig one looks promising, but it is reported to work only for the linux hosts.

    Sorry I can't be more helpful.

    --

    Wil

  • SRIOV support for FreeBSD 8.4/10.1 VM with ESX 6?

    Hello experts,

    Question

    Would like to know if the SRIOV VF drivers are supported on FreeBSD 8.4/10.1 VM with ESX 6?

    Configuration information:

    In my setup, I have Intel 82599 NIC with VF interfaces configured and assigned to a virtual 10.1 FreeBSD computer.

    But claim fails with the following error message:

    ix0: Intel (r) PRO/10GbE Virtual Function Network Driver, Version - 1.1.4 > mem 0xebaf8000-0xebafbfff, 0xebafc000-0xebafffff to the 0,0 on pci3 device

    ix0: MSIX config error

    ix0: failure of PCI resource allocation

    device_attach: ix0 attach returned 6

    pcib4: < ACPI PCI - PCI bridge > camera 21.1 on pci0

    To probe further, pci_alloc_msix() call returns-1, which is unexpected.

    The PF IGB driver on esx 5.5 is 3.21.5

    The ESX version is: ESXi 5.5.0 (Build 1331820)

    If I have a Ubuntu VM affected with a VF of the same physical NETWORK adapter interface, he claims as expected.

    If I live of e/s configured for the Intel 82599 NIC, the 10.1 FreeBSD VM calls for the interface as expected

    Guidance on the support above on ESX 6.0 help.

    Kind regards

    Nirmal

    We do not have a supported guest in 6.0 OS documentation. assuming that since the previous version is not one supported. You can provide your comments to article KB KB VMware: support of the only guest operating system Root i/o Virtualization (SR - IOV).

Maybe you are looking for