LDAP authentication does not

Similar Questions

• LDAP group does not map synchronization

  I have problems of LDAP group synchronization maps for UCS central to allow access for UCS - M connection. They are not properly synchronized.

  Hi Mark,

  Hope your week is going well. If you could answer the following questions that would help me greatly.

  We have other issues with UCSM communication plant or just this LDAP configuration?
  Do you have any configuration of pre-existing LDAP who works, or is the first implementation of LDAP?
  You apply the LDAP configuration in the root with the central organizing?

  If you can go ahead and go to the operations management-->--> security--> local make operational policies you there organizations affected, if it does not it will not work.

  So if this is the case, go to--> user Administration and authentication--> local--> properties--> Assign/Unassign organization--> make sure that the Organization and the root are there. If only the ROOT is there it will not work and vice versa if just the organization is there, it won't work.

  Once you do that try to re - connect to central and refresh and check that the operations management tab shows in your organization.

  I hope this helps.

  Qiese Sa'di

• RADIUS authentication does not

  We currently have a switch - ms duncan, who has been put in place for GANYMEDE and works very well.  We have the same command on another switch - sw-SPARE parts and it does not work:

  !
  enable secret 5 $1$ lyQB$ OUFCNrTeluAVeH9R1Grjm0
  !
  username privilege 15 secret 5 netadmin $1$ urJC LbxLOoBdoG1064QFcjTRe1 $
  username admin privilege 15 secret 5 LGPp $1$$ QbOZQ8Ch2kpEj.tLKsp1m.
  !
  !
  AAA new-model
  !
  !
  AAA authentication login default group Ganymede + local
  authorization AAA console
  AAA authorization config-commands
  AAA authorization exec default group Ganymede + local
  AAA authorization commands 15 default group Ganymede + local
  orders accounting AAA 15 by default start-stop Ganymede group.
  !
  !
  !
  AAA - the id of the joint session
  !
  !
  single-connection host key 10.223.8.29 radius-server CiscoCisco
  RADIUS-server application made

  !

  Here's the Ganymede of ms-duncan debugging:

  MS duncan #.
  11w5d: MORE: authentication request treatment 344 AAA queues
  11w5d: MORE: treatment demand beginning 344 authentication id
  11w5d: MORE: authentication start package created for 344 (reed.vendor)
  11w5d: MORE: using the 10.223.8.29 Server
  11w5d: HIGHER (00000158) / 0/IDLE / 4383A 40: obtained immediately connect on the new 0
  11w5d: HIGHER (00000158) / 0/WRITING / 4383A 40: started 5 sec timeout
  11w5d: HIGHER (00000158) 0 / / WRITING: has written 47 bytes any request
  11w5d: HIGHER (00000158) 0 / / READ: read all header 12-byte (wait 16 bytes)
  11w5d: HIGHER (00000158) 0 / / READ: read all the reply 28 bytes
  11w5d: HIGHER (00000158) / 0 / 4383A 40: the package of treatment response
  11w5d: MORE: received the authentic GET_PASSWORD response status (8)
  11w5d: MORE: authentication request treatment 344 AAA queues
  11w5d: MORE: treatment of authentication continue id 344 of demand
  11w5d: MORE: authentication continue package generated for 344
  11w5d: HIGHER (00000158) / 0/WRITING / 4383CA 8: started 5 sec timeout
  11w5d: HIGHER (00000158) 0 / / WRITING: wrote bytes 25 requests
  11w5d: HIGHER (00000158) 0 / / READ: read all 12 byte header (allow 6 bytes)
  11w5d: HIGHER (00000158) 0 / / READ: read all the reply 18 bytes
  11w5d: HIGHER (00000158) / 0 / 4383CA 8: the package of treatment response
  11w5d: MORE: received the status of response authentic PASS (2)
  11w5d: MORE: queues application of AAA 344 for transformation
  11w5d: HIGHER: processing of the application for authorization id 344
  11w5d: MORE: Protocol is set to None. Jump
  11w5d: MORE: sending service AV = shell
  11w5d: MORE: sending AV cmd *.
  11w5d: MORE: application created for 344 (reed.vendor)
  11w5d: MORE: previously set server group Ganymede 10.223.8.29 +.
  11w5d: HIGHER (00000158) / 0/IDLE/4384698: got immediately connect on the new 0
  11w5d: HIGHER (00000158) / 0/WRITING/4384698: started 5 sec timeout
  11w5d: HIGHER (00000158) 0 / / WRITING: wrote bytes 66 requests
  11w5d: HIGHER (00000158) 0 / / READ: read all header 12-byte (wait 18 bytes)
  11w5d: HIGHER (00000158) 0 / / READ: read all the answer 30 bytes
  11w5d: HIGHER (00000158) / 0/4384698: the package of treatment response
  11w5d: MORE: handled AV priv-lvl = 15
  11w5d: MORE: received permission to answer for 344: PASS
  MS duncan #.

  Here's the Ganymede of debugging of sw-SPARE PARTS:

  SW-SPARE #.
  17:17:49.477 Feb 2: MORE: Queuing AAA request authentication 42 for the treatment
  17:17:49.477 Feb 2: MORE: treatment demand beginning 42 authentication id
  17:17:49.477 Feb 2: MORE: authentication start package created for 42()
  17:17:49.477 Feb 2: MORE: using the 10.223.8.29 Server
  17:17:49.482 Feb 2: HIGHER (0000002 A) / 452B47C/NB_WAIT/0: started 5 sec timeout
  17:17:49.482 Feb 2: HIGHER (0000002 A) / 0/NB_WAIT: 36 bytes written requests
  17:17:49.482 Feb 2: MORE: block everything by reading the header pak
  17:17:49.487 Feb 2: HIGHER (0000002 A) / 0/452B47C: the package of treatment response
  17:17:58.437 Feb 2: MORE: Queuing AAA request authentication 42 for the treatment
  17:17:58.437 Feb 2: MORE: treatment demand beginning 42 authentication id
  17:17:58.437 Feb 2: MORE: authentication start package created for 42()
  17:17:58.437 Feb 2: MORE: using the 10.223.8.29 Server
  17:17:58.437 Feb 2: HIGHER (0000002 A) / 4165F60/NB_WAIT/0: started 5 sec timeout
  17:17:58.437 Feb 2: HIGHER (0000002 A) / 0/NB_WAIT: 36 bytes written requests
  17:17:58.437 Feb 2: MORE: block everything by reading the header pak
  17:17:58.442 Feb 2: HIGHER (0000002 A) / 0/4165F60: the package of treatment response
  SW-SPARE #.

  It seems that the problem is that there is no user name in the package of beginning of authentication for the sw-spare:

  17:17:49.477 Feb 2: MORE: authentication start package created for 42()

  What should we do to solve this problem and get GANYMEDE work on sw-SPARE parts?

  You can add another statement to the configuration:

  property intellectual Ganymede source interface vlan1

  The order is to specify an interface / IP for all GANYMEDE + outgoing packets.

  ~ Jousset

• Operating system authentication does not not in SQL Developer 4.0.1.14

  I just tried to upgrade from the 4.0.0.12 version of the a 4.0.1.14 new and that doing so broke the OS authentication. I checked the settings and 'use Oracle Client' and 'use driver OIC/thickness' are both enabled, the correct paths.

  Launch of the previous version instead, the exact same connection works fine.

  I use the 11 GR 2 11.2.0.3 x 86 Windows 7 client, in a field. Two versions of the SQL Developer seem to be running in x 86 mode, so they should be able to use the Oracle client.

  I managed to make it work. It turned out that when I left my settings to import from the previous version, it does not seem that is imported correctly. It showed as active for the pilot of the OIC, but it was not in reality.

  So I had to disable (and restart), then turn it back on (and restart). After that, it worked fine.

• LDAP Sync does not work on custom attributes

  Gurus,
  
  I installed and configured OIM 11 g release 2. During configuration of IOM, I activated ldapsync to OID.
  
  Created a custom attribute in the OID and also on OIM. But when I change this attribute to IOM, this change won't OID and vice versa. There are no errors in the logs.
  
  Please throw some light on this.

  Everything by creating a custom to IOM, attribute entitle you the label, name... At the same time, there will be an option to provide the ldap attribute name. You must provide the name of the attribute that you created in the OID here. Then only ldap sync works on custom attributes. without specifying a ldap attribute name, ldap sync wiill does not work.

  Give it a try and post your results here.

• NAC appliance local authentication does not

  Hello

  I try a test for the NAC scenario. It's the gateway virtual oob

  I get the login page when trying to access the web, but when I try to authenticate to the local db that I get an error message and I am on the authentication screen.

  I listened with tcpdump on both interfaces. on the unreliable side, I see traffic but on the side confidence no difference in traffic doesn't appear (but maybe that's normal)

  can someone please help with detailed steps that follows authentication

  not only host--> nas--> nam (localdb)

  or some ideas

  Thank you!

  check the teporary certificates that you generated and set the field of domain name FULL to the nas ip address and so the nam

• HTTP GET with authentication does not work in Adobe Indesign javascript

  Hello

  This is the code I am trying to run in the Indesign script. The URL http://localhost:4502/content/geometrixx/en/company/news/articles.html works directly in a browser, it renders the content. But when I try running the below in Indesign, it gives the following result. It does not really give the conent return.

  InDesign script code:

  response = "";

  Conn = new Socket;

  access the Adobe homepage

  If (conn.open ("localhost:4502")) {}

  var request = "GET /content/geometrixx/en/company/news/articles.html HTTP/1.0\n\n ' +.

  "Authorization: basic admin:admin\n"

  Conn.Write (request); and read the response from the server

  response = conn.read (999999);

  Alert (Reply);

  Conn.Close ();

  }

  Output in Indesign:

  HTTP/1.1 404 not found

  Connection: close

  Server: Day-Servlet-Engine/4.1.12

  Content-Type: text/html; Charset = UTF-8

  Content-Length: 387

  Date: Wednesday, December 7, 2011 03:05:26 GMT

  <! DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//IETF//DTD HTML 2.0 / / BY" > ".

  < html > < head >

  < title > 404 not found < /title >

  < / head > < body >

  Found < H1 > < / h1 >

  < p > the requested URL /content/geometrixx/en/company/news/articles.html was not found on this server. < /p >

  < hr >

  < address > ApacheSling/2.2 (Java hotspot Server VM 64 1.6.0_29;) Mac OS X 10.7.2 x86_64) < / address >

  < body / > < / html >

  Hello

  Your code has problems.

  1 HTTP request closed 1st line. Server wait and get the data so that come from "\n\n".

  2. name and password of the user authorization string must be base64 encoding.

  You can read as a reference:

  http://en.Wikipedia.org/wiki/Basic_access_authentication

  Here's an example query:

  var request = "GET /autharea/index.html HTTP/1.1\n '.

  + "Host: (servername) \n".

  + "Content-Type: text/html;" Charset = UTF - 8\n ".

  + "Authorization: basic" + encodedData + "\n\n";

  and work with function base64 code

  var authStr = "name";

  var encodedData = base64 (authStr);

  var response = "";

  var conn = new Socket;

  var request = "GET /autharea/index.html HTTP/1.1\n '.

  + "Host: (serverName) \n"

  + "Content-Type: text/html;" Charset = UTF - 8\n ".

  + "Authorization: basic" + encodedData + "\n\n";

  If (conn.open ('130.1.6.46:80', 'UTF-8')) {}

  Conn.Write (request);

  response = conn.read (999999);

  Conn.Close ();

  Alert (Reply);

  }

  function base64 (binaryString) {}

  var keyStr = "ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz0123456789 + / =";

  var encoded = "";

  var c1, c2, c3;

  var e1, e2, e3, e4;

  var i = 0;

  While (i< binarystring.length)="">

  C1 = binaryString.charCodeAt(i++);

  C2 is equal to binaryString.charCodeAt(i++);

  C3 = binaryString.charCodeAt(i++);

  E1 = c1 > 2;

  e2 = ((c1 & 3) < 4)="" |="" (c2="">> 4);

  E3 = ((c2 & 15) < 2)="" |="" (c3=""> > 6);

  E4 = c3 & 63;

  If (isNaN (c2)) {}

  E3 = e4 = 64;

  } Else if (isNaN (c3)) {}

  E4 = 64;

  }

  encoded = code + keyStr.charAt (e1) + keyStr.charAt (e2) +.

  keyStr.charAt (e3) + keyStr.charAt (e4);

  }

  return encoded;

  }

  Ten

• How the process in two steps of authentication does not work if you are not in an area of cellular service

  Outside cellular service areas, IS those who know how the two step aunthicatuon process works in an iPhone 6, using the operating system iOS 9.3.4?  Would a being completely locked out of their iphone and apple services until they could find themselves in a cell service area? Or can it be accessed by a public wifi? Who beg to differ on whether or not it is beneficial to use when you travel?

  I did a little research to see if all Apple items shed light...

  See "How it works" in the Apple ID - Apple Support for two-factor authentication - a time that a device is approved, he'll never ask again unless you perform one or more of several things to "break the connection.

  If I were you, I would spend it TURNED off if you fear that one of these things could happen while you might not be able to obtain the code by SMS

  Frequently asked questions about the audit in two steps for Apple ID - Apple Support

  I'm confused as to why Apple would use two different expressions for what seems to be the same:

  • "Two -authentication"- and
  • "Two -step".

  The above two articles begin with a statement like: [underlining is unique, "BOLD" is synonymous with]

  "Two-factor authentication is just an extra layer of security of your ID Apple aiming to sure you are the only person who can access to your account, even if someone knows your password."

  «The two-step verification is an additional security feature for your Apple which designed to prevent anyone to access or use your account, same ID is they know your password.»

  Maybe someone with more experience can shed some light on your question and MY confusion?

• WLC Flex connect local authentication does not work

  Hi guys,.

  I'll give you a brief description of our current flexconnect configuration. We have APs configured mode flexconnect in the remote office and in local mode in the local office. Wireless LANs are the same in both locations and we have detected a problem in one specific SSID. It is a voice SSID and configured in 802.1 x mode that authenticates to a RADIUS server in the remote desktop.

  We detected only when the WAN line gets collapsed the IP phones unplugged wireless SSID and when the WAN line become free, reconnected.

  We have seen that we can configure Flexconnect local auth mode to avoid this problem, but it of esn can't work properly. We have set up APs in remote site with an IP address static and configured as NAS in the RADIUS server, but we did not see any which authenticayion in th RADIUS server package when change us the SSID to «FlexConnect auth» local

  Can you give me an idea to help solve this problem?

  Thanks in advance.

  Joel

  I suppose that clients connected by access points Flexconnect have problems where the WAN connection is down (?)

  It depends on your current configuration and security policy what are the feasible options in this scenario. If there is an available RADIUS server - who can still authenticate your users while the WAN line is down, you can configure your access points to access this server directly. You must use a FlexConnect for this group and configure the external server on the general tab, in the menu "AAA". You already made the point of access-static IP addresses and add them as clients on the RADIUS server, then it should work.

  Another option is that in the event of failure, access points to will authenticate the client based on a local data base and/or certificate. Also, this requires a FlexConnect group and the option 'Enable local authentication AP'. For example: If you are using PEAP and a specific user for VoWLAN account you can download the server and the certificates of CA to the WLC and add the credentials of this account to build the same configuration with the external server. Downside of this is the lack of central logging that may not match your security policy.

  Remember that the access point itself can't remember the relationship between the access point and FlexConnect group, in both scenarios, you need to configure all controllers manually with these MAC to the Group mappings. This behavior is different in comparison with the "groups of AP" what access point you remember during the passage of the controllers.

  The "FlexConnect local authentication" option on the SSID itself forces always use local authentication that has been configured on the FlexConnect group even if the connection with the WLC is available. I don't think that it is feasible to use it in your scenario.

  Please rate helpful messages... :-)

• Cross domain authentication does not?

  Hello community,

  I ran into a problem with authentication and am confused if it's something that in our configuration, or if it is seen elsewhere as well?

  Scenario:
  1. a service account for installation used, who has access to read for the 3 areas in question. The account itself is one of the 3 areas (not sure if this is the origin of the question, but somehow in doubt).

  2. a single tenant with 3 mounting identity, one for each region stores, all configured exactly the same way;

  Question:
  
  

  Users not in the same domain as the systems (which is also the same domain as the service account), cannot connect. There is no error thrown to the logon screen, after a moment of the authentication attempt, the user is with the login screen allowed out again. If I add accounts, which are not members of a handful of groups, they can identify.

  According to the guidelines of VMware, the problem with no authentication is possible that if a user is a member of about 100 nested groups should be solved with update 1, we have applied as well.

  Device name: VMware vCAC device
  Version of the device: 6.0.1.0 build 1569764

  Device name: identity of VMware Appliance
  The unit version: 2.0.1.0 build 1545089

  Thanks for any advice you may have.

  Bij

  Solved this problem by changing the configuration to use only the tenant default and thereby using Native AD authentication. I hope that it might help others who see similar problems.

• Smart card authentication does not

  I am currently configuring a deployment view in our environment.  Installation requires that we use smart cards to connect (Aladdin eToken Pro).  I have the aladdin software installed on the client computer.  When I run the client to view I don't get invited to my PIN and instead get a message indicating that this smart card is required for the connection.

  Smart card for my domain authentication is working because I need a smart card to connect to our current physical machines.

  Has anyone had an experience getting the aladdin etokens to work?

  Thank you

  Casey Shenberger

  It's really weird.  I don't expect this step to get this part working, but I guess stranger things have occurred.

  In general, the answer to your question is to set the GPO of Agent 'AllowSingleSignOn' to false/stop.  Then the SSO will not be attempted in remote desktop.  If, as you say, you don't want users to have access to the smart card reader in the remote desktop connection or for use with applications, the next step depends on the Protocol.  If the end users use PCoIP, then it seems that you do not want to install the Sub-function "PCoIP Smart Card" of the agent Installer and devices will not be redirected.  If end users use RDP, then use one of the client group policy to turn off the smart card redirection.  In my view, there is also a PCoIP GPO to do the same thing (or he respects the GPO of RDP, offhand, I don't remember that one).

• LDAP example does not work

  Hello.

  There is a sample script for the use of LDAP in the developer's guide of VCO, which generates an error when I run a workflow that contains this example. Error message indicates that ActiveDirectory object is not set despite the fact that the text in the guide says I can "cut, paste and adapt these examples in your scripted elements" (which implies that these are examples of work).

  Am I missing something here?

  Thank you.

  Hello

  You must install the Microsoft plug-in to be able to use this example. You can download the plugin here: vmo_microsoft_4_0_0_4240.vmoapp [[md5] | http://download3.VMware.com/Software/VMW-Preview/VCO/4.0.0.4240_GC4/vmo_microsoft_4_0_0_4240.vmoapp.MD5]

  I will change the documentation to make this clear.

  Thank you and best regards,

  Stuart (lead documentation vCO)

• NTLM authentication does not work well with Firefox and WebTier (11 GR 2)

  Hello
  We use authentication NTLM with Jason Straubs NTLM - Sentry feature (http://jastraub.blogspot.com/2008/03/ntlm-http-authentication-and.html) Page.
  
  With the old configuration of Apex 3.2 with HTTP-Server Oracle 10 g 2-companion-album, it works fine.
  
  Now install us a Web server with Oracle 11 GR 2 (Oracle Web Tier). I have set up the DADS. CONF in the same way as the old HTTP server. With IE, it works, but with Firefox, I get a HTTP 401 "authorization required". If I press the F5 key to reload the page in Firefox, it works.
  
  Any suggestions?
  
  Kind regards
  Mark

  Hi Mark,

  I'm sorry that I have not seen that you stayed with APEX 3.2. Therefore, it is fair to ESO who changed...

  First new idea:
  Debug information are useful as we see where Firefox gets to. The flow seems to be the same for both browsers. Perhaps the WebTier sends answers differently. I see another article that could be excluded for Firefox:

          -- See http://www.nabble.com/Empty-POST-requests-on-IE-td15332680.html
          -- We have to trick IE that he thinks the authentication fails, otherwise
          -- he doesn't send any data when issueing a POST because he wants to
          -- do the NTLM stuff again
          owa_util.status_line
            ( nstatus => 401,
              creason => 'Unauthorized',
              bclose_header => FALSE
            );
  

  The commentary says that the part is required for IE. The result for owa_util.status_line is perhaps send too early for Firefox or closed, that the 'old' OSH handled diffrently. If indeed this should be left aside for Firefox, you can try to change the code as follows

  IF WWV_Flow.get_browser_version != 'NSCP'
          THEN
          -- See http://www.nabble.com/Empty-POST-requests-on-IE-td15332680.html
          -- We have to trick IE that he thinks the authentication fails, otherwise
          -- he doesn't send any data when issueing a POST because he wants to
          -- do the NTLM stuff again
          owa_util.status_line
            ( nstatus => 401,
              creason => 'Unauthorized',
              bclose_header => FALSE
            );
  END IF;
  

  This leads me to a second point:
  I remember of this manual, you may need to update the owa_util when using the APEX in combination with OHS 11 g.
  What version of owa_util do you currently use?

  select owa_util.get_version from dual;
  

  APEX 3.2.1 comes with owa_util 10.2.0.6 which is the minimum required version. If your database currently has a lower version, you can update it out of your installation package APEX by running owainst.sql located in the owa- directory as sysdba.

  -Udo

  Published by: Udo on 31.08.2010 14:16
  Comparison of fixed

• Custom authentication does not work after upgrade to 4.1

  Hi, are there problems with authentication in 4.1? I can't get my new authentication scheme to work for some reason any. I was wondering, is that there are problems with 4.1?
  
  Thank you
  
  Published by: Andyindo on Sep 17, 2011 14:57

  Hi Andyindo,

  Name your packagename.function in your custom authentication as the below and check.

  >return final_users_security.valid_user

  Brgds,
  Mini

  -----------------
  Mark responds promptly

• COA Key does not.

  I have a laptop that I just have to re - install windows on without the original CD as it is second hand. I installed using a SP3 CD and the key on the bottom of the laptop, on the certificate of authenticity does not work when you try to activate. Any ideas?

  "PhobiaB13" wrote in message News: 401cab47-52fa-49 c 8-b632-973bb2db3cae...

  I have a laptop that I just have to re - install windows on without the original CD as it is second hand. I installed using a SP3 CD and the key on the bottom of the laptop, on the certificate of authenticity does not work when you try to activate. Any ideas?

  Try to use the tool to update product key for re - enter your COA key
   
  http://www.Microsoft.com/genuine/selfhelp/xppkuinst.aspx
  --

  Noel Paton | Nil Carborundum Illegitemi | CrashFixPC | The lazy three fingers