License - PIX 515E, restricted or unrestricted?

Similar Questions

• What is the difference between restricted and unrestricted PIX?

  Please give me information on the above topic.

  Also the answer before my response.

  It depends what platform PIX you what the differences are between restricted and unrestricted. For example, the PIX535 supports up to 10 interfaces on the UR version and only 8 interfaces on the R version

  By comparing the productdescriptions on CCEL you can determine what exact difference you will have on the specific platform. If you tell us you have the platform, we can help you too, of course :-)

  Kind regards

  Leo

• Question of PIX 515E

  Hi all

  We just bought a PIX 515E and try to use it, but got a number of questions. Here's the NVA of show:

  PIX-151st #show version

  Cisco PIX Firewall Version 6.3 (1)

  Cisco PIX Device Manager Version 3.0 (1)

  Updated Thursday 19 March 03 11:49 by Manu

  PIX-515E up to 5 hours and 15 minutes

  Material: PIX-515E, 64 MB RAM, Pentium II 433 MHz processor

  Flash E28F128J3 @ 0 x 300, 16 MB

  BIOS Flash AM29F400B @ 0xfffd8000, 32 KB

  0: ethernet0: the address is 000f.2457.4b12, irq 10

  1: ethernet1: the address is 000f.2457.4b13, irq 11

  Features licensed:

  Failover: enabled

  VPN - A: enabled

  VPN-3DES-AES: enabled

  Maximum Interfaces: 6

  Cut - through Proxy: enabled

  Guardians: enabled

  URL filtering: enabled

  Internal hosts: unlimited

  Flow: IKE peers unlimited: unlimited

  This PIX has a failover license only (FO).

  Problem is that we cannot ping inner harbor, if we do not switch light, but this is a unique machine. Here's another message once we turn on the switch:

  PIX-515E # config t

  WARNING *.

  Configuration of replication is NOT performed the unit from standby to Active unit.

  Configurations are no longer synchronized.

  PIX-515e (config) #.

  Please help solve this problem. I wonder if we buy the wrong license? Thank you very much.

  you have in your possession a PIX failover. That's why says in the "sh run".

  This device is intended to be used only as a failover for a live device. It will work as a live PIX, but behave badly. It is cheaper than a PIX with an unrestricted license, as it is not intended to be used as a standalone device. Check with the one that you bought to get the situation sorted.

  Good luck

  Steve

• Configuration of RADIUS and accounting AAA + PIX-515E

  Dear All;

  I want to put the accounting of PIX.

  Here is the composition of the equipment.

  ACS SE: 4.1.1.23.5

  PIX 515E: 7.0 (6)

  PIX of setting is as follows.

  GANYMEDE + Protocol Ganymede + AAA-server

  AAA-server GANYMEDE + host xx.xx.xx.xx

  key xxxxx

  order of accounting AAA GANYMEDE +.

  Console telnet accounting AAA GANYMEDE +.

  Thus, the configuration setting was written in ACS.

  But the user name is enable_15. (attached 1.jpg)

  Is it a restriction?

  Kind regards

  Reiji

  Hi Marilou,

  Looks like we have the authority to command configured on the pix. You must enable authentication configured on the RADIUS server then only we would get username is accounting, unlike pix Device IOS doesn't send user name to the RADIUS server, he would send enable_15 as username for all users.

  Configure the following command to make it work.

  AAA authentication enable console LOCAL + Ganymede

  HTH

  -Philou

• PIX 515E-> URL filtering: enabled

  Hello

  When I start my Cisco PIX 515E, I can see this output:

  Cisco PIX Firewall Version 6.3 (3)

  Features licensed:

  Failover: disabled

  VPN - A: enabled

  VPN-3DES-AES: disabled

  The maximum physical Interfaces: 3

  Maximum Interfaces: 5

  Cut - through Proxy: enabled

  Guardians: enabled

  URL filtering: enabled

  Internal hosts: unlimited

  Throughput: unlimited

  Peer IKE: unlimited

  I understand everything except "URL filtering: enabled".

  I looked in the documentation, but I can't find an explanation: is the PIX can filter requests for URL?

  Thank you in advance for the answer.

  Paolo

  Hi Paolo,.

  6.3 IOS PIX supports filtering of HTTPS and FTP sites to websense filtering servers, this option is enabled by default.

  More information can be found here:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/sw/secursw/ps2120/prod_release_note09186a00801a6d21.html

  and here:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/sw/secursw/ps2120/products_configuration_guide_chapter09186a008017278e.html#1120209

  Hope this helps-

  Jay

• PIX-515E-R-BUN MEM upgrade with PIX-515-MEM-32

  Hi all

  is it maybe possible to upgrade the PIX 515E - r

  with this release of PIX-515-MEM-32, without having to pay

  for all PIX-525-SW-R-UR = update license.

  Concerning

  Richard

  The PIX will recognize this new memory but the configuration is not supported. The upgrade of UR's memory, but also an update of license for several interfaces, failover, etc... Unless you want to add these features to your PIX, it is not necessary to upgrade memory. 32 MB is more than enough for a PIX 515R.

  Does that help?

  Scott

• Question of BandNew PIX 515E

  I got some new PIX 515E security infra-red and I had sex 2 questions about everything I tried. I installed a 5 port switch inside and cannot ping anything from the console. I have a computer on the switch, and he is able to ping other devices on the switch, but not the PIX.

  What I find strange is that when I try to ping from the inside interface on the PIX of one inside computers, PIX displays the MAC address of the computer inside in the arp table.

  My goal is to upgrade the PIX to ver7.0 but I can't do so until I can solve this problem.

  Here are some information among the PIX.

  #sh worm

  Cisco PIX Firewall Version 6.3 (4)

  Cisco PIX Device Manager Version 3.0 (2)

  Updated Saturday 2 July 04 00:07 by Manu

  pixfirewall up to 29 minutes 33 seconds

  Material: PIX-515E, 128 MB RAM, Pentium II 433 MHz processor

  Flash E28F128J3 @ 0 x 300, 16 MB

  BIOS Flash AM29F400B @ 0xfffd8000, 32 KB

  Hardware encryption device: VAC + (Crypto5823 revision 0 x 1)

  0: ethernet0: the address is 0015.625a.f7da, irq 10

  1: ethernet1: the address is 0015.625a.f7db, irq 11

  2: ethernet2: the address is 000d.8810.902c, irq 11

  3: ethernet3: the address is 000d.8810.902d, irq 10

  4: ethernet4: the address is 000d.8810.902e, irq 9

  5: ethernet5: the address is 000d.8810.902f, irq 5

  Features licensed:

  Failover: enabled

  VPN - A: enabled

  VPN-3DES-AES: disabled

  The maximum physical Interfaces: 6

  Maximum Interfaces: 10

  Cut - through Proxy: enabled

  Guardians: enabled

  URL filtering: enabled

  Internal hosts: unlimited

  Throughput: unlimited

  Peer IKE: unlimited

  This PIX has a failover license only (FO).

  #sh run

  interface ethernet1 100full

  nameif ethernet1 inside the security100

  pixfirewall hostname

  domain testlan

  access-list acl_out permit icmp any one

  No external ip address

  IP address inside 192.168.1.222 255.255.255.0

  No IP failover outdoors

  No IP failover inside

  #sh int e1

  interface ethernet1 'inside' is up, line protocol is up

  The material is i82559 ethernet, the address is 0015.625a.f7db

  IP 192.168.1.222, subnet mask 255.255.255.0

  MTU 1500 bytes, BW 100000 Kbit full duplex

  Hi M8,

  Your firewall has a license of FO, you must enable this device to be able to see it.

  Run the command:

  active failover

  With this command, the device turns into the 'Active' from a perspective of failover state. It will work after that.

  See you soon.

  Salem.

• 4240 IPS blocking queries with Pix 515E

  I have activated the lock on the 4240 and put locking as our Pix 515E. When I look at the Configurations of Signature quite a few Signature Actions are set to alert only produce. If blocking is enabled you also go and the Actions of signing the Deny value or TCP Reset? So far my attackers show dosen't IPS refused and he detected the high level of traffic which I assume must now be blocked. Thanks John

  Yes, go under the signatures that you want and enable blocking for them as an action. Globally blocking configuration (setting the blocking device, the interface, the connection of the device information, etc.), does not actually blocked on the sensor itself, we must still go and activate the blocking of this particular signature. When this particular GIS fires in the future, the sensor it will block on the device that you configured.

  Be very careful with blocking, the reason that we're not blocking simply all the signatures, it is that it would be very dangerous to blindly add access lists to a device that will stop traffic. You must first make sure that you don't get any number of false positives on the signatures and end up blocking valid traffic. In addition, on a busy sensor you could easily overrun detector and locking to writing and deleting 1000's of top access lists. And finally, although probably not, blocking can even be used as an attack denial of service, where an attacker, if they know what signatures you block, can usurp packages past your sensor so that it denies traffic to our legitimate guests.

  You have to look at what signatures you really want to block, and then enable blocking on them individually.

• Cisco VPN Client Authentication - PIX 515E-UR

  Hi all

  I need your expert help on the following issues I have:

  1. I would like to create more than 1 client VPN on my PIX-515E groups. This is so that I can give a different part of the internal network access to different type of VPN connection. For example, I want a group to have no XAUTH, while the other group must use RADIUS XAUTH. Is it possible for me to do this? I see the PIX automatically enable RADIUS on both groups of VPN clients.

  2. the RADIUS server is a Microsoft ISA with IAS server and it is located on the PIX inside interface. The VPN endpoint is external interface of the PIX. Is there a problem with this Setup? Do I need to have the RADIUS server that is located on the external interface?

  3 can. what command I use to debug RADIUS authentication?

  Thanks in advance for your help.

  Hi vincent,.

  (1) you can use the vpngroup *-authentication server ipaddress to specify the IP address of the Radius Server on a particular group... If you do not specify this, the authentication of the user is made locally... also check for vpngroup * order of user authentication

  (2) there should be no problem with the installation of your... should work fine... If the RADIUS is outdoors, it is subject to many attacks... so have it inside...

  (3) use the "RADIUS session debug" or "debug aaa authentication..."

  I hope this helps... all the best... the rate of responses if found useful

  REDA

• Clearing its IPSec on a PIX 515E

  Hello

  Is it possible to delete a particular IPSec security association to a PIX 515E Version 6.3 (1)?

  Concerning

  Lisbeth

  Clear [crypto] ipsec his destination-address spi protocol entry

  is what you are looking for.

• PIX 515E for VPN remote site

  Hello

  7.0 (1) version pix

  ASDM version 5.0 (1)

  I have a situation where you go paas-thanks to the VPN feature goes on our PIX 515E. I tried to put this on the pix using a VPN Wizard Site to site

  who is enabled. I was unable to connect to the pix from the remote site. Witch's journal replied negotiate the pix is OK and the success

  The problem is when I try to set up the tunnel to the top of the remote site. I fall without failure.

  where can I see the vpn pix for error log?

  is there a manual for the solution of site to site VPN using the wizard

  Help, please.

  Thanks in advance

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/partner/products/HW/vpndevc/ps2030/products_configuration_example09186a00804acfea.shtml#ASDM

  the section 'use adsm' (step 14) gives an example on how to set up vpn lan - lan via adsm

  Newspaper to go to the section "check".

• RV320 PIX 515E tunnel

  Hi all...
  I have a RV320 (internal LAN 10.78.0.0/24) connection to a PIX 515E (10.10.0.0/24) using the VPN Tunnel.
  The tunnel between the two is in place and working.

  My workstation (10.10.0.47), I can ping and connect to a server on the LAN of RV320 (10.78.0.54)

  Now if I remote in the 10.78.0.54 area, I cannot ping or connect to my desktop (10.10.0.47).
  However, I can ping the inside interface of the PIX 515E 10.10.0.252

  So what am I missing here?

  The LAN is 10.78.0.0/24. Do the remote VPN pool 10.78.1.0/24. Then use 10.78.0.0/23 as the field of encryption.

• PIX 515E failover

  I have a pair of PIX 515E (6.3) running in failover mode. They are currently connected to a single chassis base. We are upgrading our network with the heart, dual 6500's. Is there a way to connect each PIX to a separate kernel (1 PIX - Core1, PIX 2 - Core2) to allow a failure of the base?

  Core 1 and Core 2 will have a L2 link between them. If the current active PIX is connected to Core1 and Core 1 dies, this would not lead to support PIX failover. All LAN traffic would go through Core 2, but since he does not have an active path to the active PIX 1, traffic would drop. My reasoning is correct?

  Is there a way to connect the PIX to two cores running V6.3?

  Hello

  If you use the cable-based failover, you can change the basis of LAN failover.

  Read http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/pix/pix63/configuration/guide/failover.html#wp1024836

  I hope this helps.

  Best regards.

  Massimiliano.

• Several outbound VPN connections behind PIX-515E

  I will take a PIX-515E off-site for a provision of access internet location. I have several people behind this PIX, who will have to return to the same Office VPN. One person can VPN through the PIX very well, but if someone else tries to VPN they cannot. Once the first person has disconnected for 10 minutes, then the next person can connect. I activated the NAT - T and added fixup protocol esp-ike. What can I do it wrong? Thank you.

  fixup protocol esp-ike - allows PAT to (ESP), one tunnel.

  Please remove this correction.

  If the remote site has NAT - T enabled, then you should be able to use NAT - T and more than 1 user should be able to use behind the PIX VPN client.

  See you soon

  Gilbert

• PIX 515E failover restart problems

  Thursday, November 23, we went from the PIX cluster to version 7.1 (2) 6.2 (2) with the default memory (64 MB) in each PIX. The Active PIX then suffered what appeared to be leaking memory (attributed to process ARP Thread). This continued for a few days? with the result that we force reloaded the Active PIX every 8 hours to ensure the continuity of the service. Monday 27 after a reload? It has been noticed that the Active PIX leaked is more memory per process threads ARP? the same day, we went from the cluster PIX to 128 MB of memory. Then, we have had failovers active / standby every 2 hours? that seems to be attributed to missed? Hello? in the e-mail of failover? We decided then to configure LAN failover on the PIX cluster. In the process of activation of this secondary feature PIX (which was the current asset) crashed

  You have any explanation as to why these events took place.

  Hi Carlton,

  I can tell you that maybe the method you used to upgrade starts the chain of problems. I used for the migration of these products and I've never met before. In general I WINS configurations, program a service stop and I leave the unit of failover working alone while I do the upgrade of the unit the ex-active. After the upgrade, I had loaded the software configuration I saved before and made the customizations.

  For the PIX without restrictions, is real memory of 128 MB required. For the restricted permission, you can use the default of 64 MB.

  After that, you can place the active unit instead of the recovery. You improve the unit of failover so and connect again in active, already in production and restart the synchronization.

  For all my clients, it worked.

  It will be useful. If Yes, please rate.

  Kind regards

  Rafael Lanna