Lightroom more slowly than Lr5 cc and struggling for simple cropping and Pan

Similar Questions

• Photos of more saturated than Library Web and develop.

  The photos in the Web Module are more saturated than in modules library, Develop, book or a slide show.  The Web Gallery uploaded/exported seems normal is only displaying in the Web Module.  Here are the screenshots of the classic Gallery, but the other galleries are also affected.

  The screen is calibrated using a Spyder 5 and this seems to be a new problem that I remember this problem in versions prior to 2015.7.  Using OS X 10.11.6

  Library

  

  Web

  

  The problem is that the Web module does not use the screen profile.  See the bug report, I have just tabled for how I confirmed that: Web module does not use the screen color - incorrect color management profile | Community customer Photoshop family . I linked to this topic, but add your vote me-too and opinion for the bug report to make it more likely that Adobe could give priority to a solution.

• Why run exe file run more slowly than vi format when we build application exe?

  Jin

  We build the file vi drifter but exe file to run slower than the file vi. I check several vi and get the same result, which is slow, why?

  Thank you.

  The executable runs on the same PC that you have developed it, or on another PC when it is running slowly?  (Thinking that if it's on another PC, it hangs on errors for things that cannot be installed on the 2nd PC.)

  Where is the current slowdown?  Is it possible to have errors that happen that you do not see (as in the communication of the database) and which is at the origin of things run slowly because of time-out errors occur?

  I recommend you build your VI with a code debugging in it.  As indicators to show which are the son of the error.  Maybe create a simple Subvi who will save a timestamp and a description to a file and that scatter around your code, then you can connect at run time.

• TimesTen turns more slowly than Oracle RDBMS

  Hello

  I installed timesten, and I just wanted to compare the performance of the following pl/sql block on with same block on Oracle timesten.

  declare

  date of temp_date;

  date of temp_date1;

  number of my_id;

  my_data varchar2 (200);

  cursor c1 is select MASTER_ID, MONTANA

  of AKS_TAB_MASTER;

  c2 (p_id number) cursor is select detail_ID dDATA of

  AKS_TAB_DETAIL

  where master_id = p_id;

  Start

  t loop c1

  Open c2 (t.master_id);

  extract the c2 in my_id, my_data.

  insert into aks_temp values (t.master_id, my_id, t.MDATA, my_data);

  Close c2;

  end loop;

  end;

  I created a group of cache in Timesten for caching table AKS_TAB_MASTER & AKS_TAB_DETAIL

  I created the AKS_TAB_DETAIL table in Oracle and timesten separately to avoid transmission

  In some ways, TimesTen takes 4 times longer than Oracle.

  I went through a link TimesTen Database Performance Tuning and database as my settings as follows:

  Permanent data format 640

  Temporary data of size 300

  Replicate parallel buffer MB 480

  Log File Size (MB) NULL

  Size of the buffer log (Mo) 320

  Cach AWT method 1-PLSQL

  AWT parallelism NULL cAche

  PL/SQL Connection limited memory (MB) 320

  PL/SQL optimization level 2

  PL/SQL Memory Size (MB) 240

  PL/SQL Timeout (seconds) 600

  I get always poor performance of TimesTen.

  No idea what could be wrong on my instance.

  Please suggest.

  Thank you

  Amit

  I was watching just the info you posted and I was about to point out the missing foreign key. In TimesTen set a primary or foreign key results in an index being created. You would have seen improvement even if you create an index on the MTAX. AKS_TAB_DETAIL (MASTER_ID). Without this index each execution of the query cursor c2 was a full table of param2tres table scan (which is obviously much slower than the indexed access).

  TimesTen is a database in memory you will need to apply database optimization techniques usual whose correct indexing is very important.

  Chris

• Why more expensive than buying just the upgrade for Adobe Photoshop and elements first?

  I currently have Photoshop and first elements 12 installed on my mac and when I go to upgrade to 13 the price increases just to buy both because of the sale. Can I buy it for the cheaper price and uninstall the current version?... or what I need to upgrade and pay more money?

  An upgrade is identical to the full version. It's just a pricing formula that Adobe offers to existing customers throughout the year. But Black Friday offers and holidays are usually best.

• OBIEE on 64-bit Windows 7?  Why it is more difficult than Cognos, Qlikview and table?

  Hi - Can you if you please clarify this in detail... I have some questions while 11 g OBIEE installation on windows 7, 64-bit version...
  Can you please provide instructions step-by-step with screenshots (if possible) set. I tried all the available sites... but still the problems and it consumes a lot of time...
  I downloaded...
  Version for Java-> and the path of the folder is c:\java
  Java version "1.7.0_10".
  Java (TM) SE Runtime Environment (build 1.7.0_10 - b18)
  Java for 64-bit Server VM (build 23, 6 - b04, mixed mode)
  -> You can please keep us posted of Environment Variables that we support on Windows 7 computers. All variables Temp, Java and other records that were needed.
  
  WebLogic Version downloaded on OTN:_
  wls1035_generic
  Path of the temporary folder_
  c:\Temp.
  Version OBIEE downloaded:_
  bi_windows_x86_111160_64_disk1_1of2-> basically version 11.1.1.1.1.6.0 for Windows 64-bit.
  
  Steps followed:
  I installed the ofm_rcu_win_11.1.1.6 .0_disk1_1of1-> basically the 64-bit version.
  Then
  Installed the loopback adapter:_
  -> In the hosts file, I haven't had one line added (the rest of the file is commented).
  10.10.10.10 ComputerName-> where ComputerName is the name of the computer.
  _ Installed and configured the OBIEE
  Installation very well with errors and I did the Installation of the software (the last option)...
  While Cofiguring, it's blocked upward at the first step... Domain configuration... Tried to 10000000 times... and when checked the log file showing the message below...
  
  [2011-07 - 01 T 12: 00:23.500 + 05:30] [as] [NOTIFICATION] [] [oracle.as.install.bi] [tid: 24] [ecid: 0000J3 ^ OytODwWWFLzrI8A1E3LWh00000F, 0] listening port of the found nodes Properties Manager: null
  [2011-07 - 01 T 12: 00:23.500 + 05:30] [as] [NOTIFICATION] [] [oracle.as.install.bi] [tid: 24] [ecid: 0000J3 ^ OytODwWWFLzrI8A1E3LWh00000F, 0] Impossible to reuse management nodes - port is null
  [2011-07 - 01 T 12: 00:23.500 + 05:30] [as] [NOTIFICATION] [] [oracle.as.install.bi] [tid: 24] [ecid: 0000J3 ^ OytODwWWFLzrI8A1E3LWh00000F, 0] no reusable node Manager found.
  [2011-07 - 01 T 12: 00:23.500 + 05:30] [as] [NOTIFICATION] [] [oracle.as.install.bi] [tid: 24] [ecid: 0000J3 ^ OytODwWWFLzrI8A1E3LWh00000F, 0] configuration manager for the completed initial node.
  [2011-07 - 01 T 12: 00:23.500 + 05:30] [as] [NOTIFICATION] [] [oracle.as.install.bi] [tid: 24] [ecid: 0000J3 ^ OytODwWWFLzrI8A1E3LWh00000F, 0] trust Port: 9556 to: NODE_MANAGER_PORT
  I had already installed Cognos, table and QlikView... it is far that took a lot of time, even to download the files, the installation and configuration...
  Please let me know your thoughts... Thank you very much for your time... Please do not consult your different websites or blogs to follow installation... like I already followed more of them, I found after searching on Google... and some of them don't even point to the exact versions they were downloading...

  Hi guys - Am finally able to install OBIEE11g...
  Under the link were the prerequisites to make 100% sure for installing windows 7 64 bit.
  http://OracleBI.blog.com/OBIEE-11-1-1-6-installation/
  To come to the questions that I did...
  For the Installation of Enterprise Edition (Option 2 in the GUI Setup screen) *.
  (1.) I had "jdk1.7.0_10" installed in the folder "C:\Java".
  Which tent to install OBIEE 11.1 it install weblogic version '10.3.5' because it is not compatible with "jdk1.7.0_10" had questions.
  To install only software *.
  1.), I had to download and install "wls1036_generic.jar" from OTN.
  You must make sure that install you it by following the steps below, but not just by double clicking on it... because it's a kind of 32-bit Setup by double clicking (yaa this is odd) even if you expect a 64-bit.
  a.) open the command prompt
  (b) go to the folder where 'java-jar wls1036_generic.jar' has been installed
  (c.) and then run 'java-jar wls1036_generic.jar ".
  Other issues *.
  1.) turn off the Windows Firewall during Installation.
  2.) uninstall Antivirus
  Not sure about the credibility of the two points above, fell on some sites I'm tired of trying all options and at some point... I turned off them and never their return on...
  Source *: various Web sites on the basis of different errors and mix for the Info, try different options to resolve an error/problem.
  Hope it will be useful to someone... I still say that Installation is not as simple as other BI tools on the market.

• Web pages load more slowly than normal. Why is this? I did the update to FireFox.

  Pages take a while to load. Firefox is slow. Internet Explore will be charge the same pages in no time. Why is this? I had FireFox for some time and never had any problems. It lasts for months.

  Hello

  The reset Firefox feature can solve a lot of problems in restaurant Firefox to its factory default condition while saving your vital information.
  Note: This will make you lose all the Extensions, open Web sites and preferences.

  To reset Firefox, perform the following steps:

  1. Go to Firefox > help > troubleshooting information.
  2. Click on the button 'Reset Firefox'.
  3. Firefox will close and reset. After Firefox is finished, it will display a window with the imported information. Click Finish.
  4. Firefox opens with all the default settings applied.

  Information can be found in the article Firefox Refresh - reset the settings and Add-ons .

  This solve your problems? Please report to us!

  If you have security software (antivirus, firewall etc.), you can also try to check by disabling it temporarily, turn on the Windows Firewall and browse a few well-known websites without downloading or installing anything. You can also disable (uncheck) Enable Javascript in Firefox Tools (Alt + T) > Options > contentand turn off the Plugins in Tools (Alt + T) > modules before checking it in.

• Computer runs more slowly than before.

  I have a desktop computer. I was looking around and found the "reliability monitor and performance." I ran the test and here are the results:

  Diagnostic warnings!

  SYMPTOM: The Security Center has not declared - virus application... it is not anti virus product or it is not recognized

  CAUSE: Security Center cannot identify an antivirus application

  Solution: 1. check that the anti-virus is installed

  2. If installed, configure Security Center to stop monitoring anti virus status.

  I have not yet tried this solution

  Now, I have little idea of what I'm doing. I thought I read here that the 'Defender' is not available for Vista, that "Essentials" disabled or something like that.

  I know it's on my computer, but when I try to open and turn it on I get an error message. (error "0x800106ba") Usually hidden until I try to close all windows.

  Windows Defender is part of the Vista operating system.

  If you have Microsoft Security Essentials, AVG, McAfee, Norton, etc. installed, they have a conflict with Windows Defender, or turn it off.

  Microsoft Security Essentials has its own integrated version of the defender and should automatically disable the version of Vista in Windows Defender.

  If it's not:

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows-Vista/turn-Windows-Defender-on-or-off

  Turn Windows Defender on or off the information on the link above of Microsoft.

  Hope the above explains the common compatibility issues with Windows Defender and other security programs.

  See you soon.

  Mick Murphy - Microsoft partner

• First Pro CS5 never uses more than 15% of CPU, so perform much more slowly than first 6.5!

  Hello.

  I make videos of marriage for a while. My material included map DV500DVD and first 6.5 CPU Core 2 Duo E8400, 2 GB of RAM, Windows XP SP1 (DV500 does not work with SP2 or SP3).

  The above system is quite old and absolutely not usable for HD videos. So, I decided to build another machine. The configuration is the following:

  OS: Windows 7 Professional 64 bit.

  M/b: Asus LGA 1155, H67 chipset.

  CPU: Intel Core i7 - 2600K

  RAM: 4 GB DDR3

  HARD drive: 2 x 64 GB SSD, 2 TB SATA (RAID) 4 x (all drives connected to separate the controller PCI-E chipset fault intel isn't a problem here)

  I recently downloaded and installed the first Pro CS5 trial version, to see how he adapts to my needs. And I'm very disappointed. I started the first, chosen preset widescreen DV, inserted two static images on the timeline and made a mix alpha between them. Then put movie export. Not only it took too long to make, but it only used a nucleus, and the CPU usage is only 15%. Just out of curiosity, I installed first 6.5 on the same system, and he did this task about 10 times faster!

  That is, limitation of the trial version, or just first Pro CS5 cannot be used with this modern processor?

  Thanks in advance,

  Alex

  I can understand your experience... After I installed Windows 7 and CS5 Production Premium, adding another 8 Gig of Ram for my PC, dying on the fact that my Nvidia Quadro FX 4600 is not able to use the reading mercury and literally hours of waiting for spending returns, on a hunch, and after reading about someone else who did the same thing.  Finally, I took my old PP CS3 and installed on alongside first CS5. To my surprise, with 64-bit OS, CS3 running and makes exactly the same content about 4 times faster, does not idiosyncratic seizures slow when moving clips in the timeline, no white on the error screen "not responding" messages, etc.etc. I have no problem with After Effects or Photoshop CS5, they work fine, but first CS5 is close not functional as it gets. A: 30 minutes with some effects of magic bullet, even native capture HDV format takes about 10 minutes with PPCS3... and about 45 minutes with CS5. CS3 also reads smoother and barely stutters, so that I have to sit and to return with CS5 because of choking in order to continue working. One post suggested that I don't have enough gas in the machine, dual core AMD Opterons 3.2 GHZ, disks, 16 Gig ram working 7200 and 10 000 rpm... but cannot see how CS5 can maybe make CS3 on the same stage. What I'm missing here? I'm not whining just baffled.

• I have 2 sticks flash, a 4GB & A 16 GB, my biggest stick flash transfers more slowly, is this normal?

  Hello, my problem is that I bought a bigger stick flash (16 GB) like my old man a (4 GB) was too small for what I used it for. When I bought it, he says he has high transfer but it works more slowly than without a faster transfer.  I know that NTFS is slower but have verified that they are both FAT32 and that you have formatted ensure them!  Here are my results for transfer rates for both if it helps:

  4GB Flash stick = 7.20 MB\s

  18 GB Flash stick = 3,70 MB\s

  For this to be a fair test I did it on the same USB port!

  Please can you tell me if it is normal to happen?

  Yes, it's normal. Different flash drives have different flow rates. This is why it is good to read consumer reviews before you buy a USB. My AData 16 GB drive is certainly a little slower than my old 8 GB Kingston. MS - MVP - Elephant Boy computers - don't panic!

• Paper photo DESKJE F4480 fuels more slowly that it prints.

  Photo paper feeds more slowly than expected to print correctly. If you help in putting pressure on the paper, it helps but not satisfactory.

  Power ok plain paper. Looks like paper slips into the feeder. At startup, it prints on top of the sheet so you don't push it by hand.

  Thanks in advance for any help.

  HI JANDSCOX,

  It seems that the feed tires are getting worn out. I would clean a little more time to see if it improves.

• Is it possible to use LightRoom on more than 2 pc and how?

  Hello

  That someone answer this question?

  Is it possible to use LightRoom on more than 2 pc and how?

  Because I'm dependencies on PC and laptop 2, I realized I'm allowed to have only 2 installed LR. Is it possible to use it on 3?

  Thanks for your help read you soon

  Greatings from Geneva Switzerland

  Phil

  You must read the exact terms of the license.

  Photoshop Lightroom - Adobe Labs end-user license agreement

  2.4 portable or home computer use. The primary user of the computer on which the software is installed may install a second copy of the software for his or her use exclusive on a laptop or a computer located at his or her home, the software on the portable or home computer is not used at the same time as the software on the primary computer.

  If you have Lightroom installed on computers A and B, and then you uninstall a license on computer B, you could install Lightroom on computer C, it is always very well because you have installed on two computers A and C.

• When you subscribe to creative Cloud(Photoshop and Lightroom), that come with more than one license, and is it possible to install it on Windows and Apple (if it comes with two licenses)? Thank you.

  When you subscribe to creative Cloud(Photoshop and Lightroom), it does it with more than one license, and if so, is it possible to install on Windows and Apple OX? Thank you.

  A Cloud subscription provides for the installation of facilities to work on both machines.  You can have (Windows and Apple OX) operating systems.

• have 5 LR and CC. The folders are different, some are missing in the CC. And some complete are not available in CC. I'm looking forward to use CC rather than LR5 so how can I make the folders and collections even on each?

  have 5 LR and CC. The folders are different, some are missing in the CC. And some Collections are not available in CC. I'm looking forward to use CC rather than LR5 so how can I make the folders and collections even on each?

  Hi cjohnm,

  You can use the 5 Lightroom Catalog and improve it in Lightroom 6, therefor all folders and collections will be identical in both version.

  Open the Lightroom all holding the key Alt/Opt and select only the 5 Lightroom Catalog and it will switch to it.

  Let us know if that helps.

  Kind regards

  Mohit

• I bought lightroom 6 at amazon, but it will not be installed. All I said "Installer failed to initialize, please download Adobe install advisor to detect the problem", but it does not exist. It gives me no more information than that. I have already

  I bought lightroom 6 at amazon, but it will not be installed. All I said "Installer failed to initialize, please download Adobe install advisor to detect the problem", but it does not exist. It gives me no more information than that. I already had a free annual subscription to cc through my new canon camera, but I installed for my mac already. No phone number to call, adobe contact to say amazon, what do I do?

  start at the top and work your way down to apply applicable patches until your problem is solved.

  If (win) cc: https://helpx.adobe.com/creative-cloud/kb/creative-cloud-desktop-application-failed.html

  If your error is:

  "Setup failed to initialize. File not found. ' or 'could not initialize installation. This could be due to missing files.

  first of all, rename folder OOBE OOBE.old.

  to find the OOBE:

  Win 64 bit OS: Program Files x86\Common Files\Adobe\OOBE

  Win 32 bit OS: Program Files \Common Files\Adobe\OOBE

  Mac os: HD > library > application support of > adobe > caps

  Mac os: USER > library > application support of > adobe > OOB

  If it fails or isn't the exact error you see, uninstall, clean (http://www.adobe.com/support/contact/cscleanertool.html) and reinstall.

  If you use an installation dvd:

  Copy the contents of the drive in a desktop folder and install from this directory.

  If you are using a mac:

  1. try to create a new user account in Mac with administrator privileges.

  2. connect to the new user, navigate to Mac HD > Application > utilities > Adobe Installer folder, locate products such as Adobe Reader, Adobe Flash, Adobe Air and uninstall the

  3. navigate to the user library > Application Support > Adobe and Adobe put in the trash.

  4. navigate to Mac HD > library > Application Support > Adobe and Adobe put in the trash.

  5 restart the installation.

  If everything is applicable above fails, check your Setup logs:

  http://helpx.Adobe.com/Photoshop-elements/KB/troubleshoot-install-using-logs-elements.html