Limit filter or bug?

Similar Questions

• Slide with several digital poster Down filter event Bug button?

  A key event filter on a slide with several digital screens down does not work as expected when not waived. If you for example tab of this slide with two digital screens digital display, the cursor remains on his position, rather than get KeyFocus to the next control. Same behavior at fault if you want to move the cursor on the left/right keyboard, nothing happens. Anyone an idea why?

  A simulation of that VI is attached. All other controls, a Slide with a digital display or a standard digital control, the key Down event filter behaves as expected... I tested in versions 8.5.1 LV (attachment), LV2012SP1 and LV2013.

  A teammate now found a solution or workaround. We do not know if this is the way it should be, if yes, then it's a bit hidden, but it works!

  It seems that the cursor needs to know on what digital display the FocusObj is when you use the event notifier KeyDown. Then, when to get the reference of the digital display active and the wiring of this reference to the terminal FocusObj filter event everything works as expected, numbers of tabs, typed, cursor etc and have to filter and notify events structure to the event.

  A vi and a printscreen are attached.

  The question is probably due to the specialty of slides and the class NumericWithScale in general, as its digital displays are a little under References and during the implementation of the features of event KeyDown for the class NumericWithScale filter, LV simply does not know on which side of the main action control part must be executed.

  Or someone has a better solution and explanation?

• Blur the limit filter lines are not displayed. Y at - it a setting or a switch that displays these files directly? PS CC

  I use PS CC.  Some blurry Iris.  I can see the PIN and when I move to the edge of the blur I see double arrow and arrow keys, but there is no displayed elliptical line.  This is true of other filters.

  Apple still has some problems to 10.9.4 with video drivers.

  But I do not remember this specific problem.

  OK, let's check out what is obvious: view-> Extras (and the view-> Show menu to perform a check).

• How to have the filter query/dialogue opened when the report is launched in the workspace?

  Is it possible to have a default value for the report to prompt the user for a value of filter/query when the report is opened in the workspace? Currently, when a report is released, it will display data from the previous report instance.

  Not really.

  You could put a limit/filter on the query Section and then change to limit/filter Variable.

  You want to add the following code in the Scripts of the bqy

  "" "ActiveDocument.Sections ["Query"]." Process()

  where the query is the name of the Section application to deal with.

  When the file is opened, you should get the limit/filter dialog box and when the value is supplied the query will run and update the data for you

  hope this is what you need to do

  Wayne

• Satellite A200-1vp with Vista - code 39 of the CD/DVD drive failure

  Hello

  I was burning and watch DVDs on my Satellite A200 - 1 VP, with vista, since February, the last time I burned anything was a couple of weeks.

  Suddenly, there is a problem, no response when I insert a disc and my divx player says me no recorder found.

  When I am looking in the Device Manager I get the message 'windows cannot load the driver for this hardware' (code 39) "driver is damaged or missing.

  I tried to uninstall it and using the limit filter upper/lower of Toshiba, repair tool but on restart it still cannot install.

  Should I try the Toshiba Recovery Disc and lose a lot of that programs/files, as a last resort?
  Would this work?
  Anyone have any ideas?

  Here's an interesting article from Microsoft Knowledge:
  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/270008/en-us

  You must first access the Device Manager and should remove the reader of CD/DVD from the list of devices.
  Then should access the registry and delete the Upperfilters and Lowerfilters completely from the following registry key values:
  HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Contro l\Class\ {4D36E965-E325-11CE-BFC1-08002BE10318}

  Reboot the laptop and check if the CD/DVD drive would work again!

• Restrict it to certain IP addresses for establishing IPSec

  Is it possible on Cisco ASA 55xx to limit (filter) some public IP addresses that would be THE ONLY book able to establish remote access IPSec VPN using the Cisco VPN client? Suppose that Cisco VPN client establishes the VPN public IP (always the same) fixed.

  So, I do not speak about the actions of the ACL on the VPN traffic. I wonder about the IPSec tunnel creation and prevent certain public IPs to even try it.

  Thank you.

  Hello Ivan,.

  You can use the access-list control-plan to filter to the ASA VPN connections by blocking UDP 500.

  For example:

  ciscoasa (config) #-access VPN-FILTER list deny udp host host eq 500

  ciscoasa (config) #-FILTER-VPN ip access list allow a whole

  ciscoasa (config) # access - group FILTER-VPN in interface out-of- control plan

  Kind regards.

  ----
  Meshaal previously

  -------

  Edit: Didn't see the answer of the Marcins

  Post edited by: Frédéric Alshboul

• How to diagnose and recover corrupt datafile?

  DBMS: Oracle v.9.2.0.1.0

  Operating system: MS Server 2003 R2 SP2 x 86

  Problem: The database start to stop every few minutes. I start checking and found one and the largest of the two data files is probably damaged. Now, I don't know how to fix this data file.

  First of all, I look in the alert.log and see that ^.

  ...

  Mon Jul 29 11:02:03 2013

  SMON: enabling the recovery of tx

  Mon Jul 29 11:02:03 2013

  Database character set is CL8MSWIN1251

  off replication_dependency_tracking (no replication multimaster async found)

  Completed: alter database open

  Mon Jul 29 11:02:42 2013

  KCF: writing / open error blocks = 0x3c009f = 1 online

  file = 4 F:\ORACLE\ORADATA\ORCL\USERS_1.ORA

  error = txt 27069: ' OSD-04026: invalid parameter passed. (OS 3932319) "

  Mon Jul 29 11:02:42 2013

  Errors in the c:\oracle\admin\orcl\bdump\orcl_dbw0_3604.trc file:

  ORA-01242: data file failed to support: database in NOARCHIVELOG mode

  ORA-01114: IO error to the file 4 (block # 3932319) writing block

  ORA-01110: data file 4: "F:\ORACLE\ORADATA\ORCL\USERS_1.ORA".

  ORA-27069: skgfdisp: try to do i/o beyond the scope of the file

  OSD-04026: invalid parameter passed. (OS 3932319)

  DBW0: end of litigation because of the error 1242

  Instance terminated by DBW0, pid = 3604

  C:\oracle\admin\orcl\bdump\alert_orcl.log dump file

  ...

  So I lit archivelog and open the database but it continue to stop when someone calls to certain DB objects.

  Then I check v$ headers:

  SQL > select file #, status, recover, fuzzy, nom_tablespace, to_char(CHECKPOINT_CHANGE#), name from v$ datafile_header;

  FOLDER # STATUS REC FUZ NOM_TABLESPACE TO_CHAR(CHECKPOINT_CHANGE#) NAME

  ---------- ------- --- --- -------------------- ---------------------------------------- ----------------------------------

  1 YES SYSTEM 9679059694215 F:\ORACLE\ORADATA\ORCL\SYSTEM ONLINE. ORA

  2 ONLINE WITHOUT CANCELING YES F:\ORACLE\ORADATA\ORCL\UNDO 9679059694215. ORA

  3 NO YES 9679059694215 F:\ORACLE\ORADATA\ORCL\USERS USERS ONLINE. ORA

  4 YES YES 9679059697551 F:\ORACLE\ORADATA\ORCL\USERS_1.ORA USERS OFFLINE

  For some reason, USERS in USERS_1.ORA is offline and marked as requiring recovery.

  I tried to recover datafile, but got some errors:

  SQL > recover datafile 'F:\ORACLE\ORADATA\ORCL\USERS_1.ORA ';

  ORA-00283: cool cancelled due to errors

  ORA-01115: reading block IO file error 4 (block # 3932319)

  ORA-01110: data file 4: "F:\ORACLE\ORADATA\ORCL\USERS_1.ORA".

  ORA-27069: skgfdisp: try to do i/o beyond the scope of the file

  OSD-04026: invalid parameter passed. (OS 3932319)

  Who have look scary to me.

  I try to check the data file:

  dBV blocksize = 16384 logfile=F:\oracle\oradata\orcl\dbvlog.txt file=F:\oracle\oradata\orcl\users_1.ora

  The result of the check was unexpected:

  DBVERIFY: Release 9.2.0.1.0 - Production on Tue Jul 30 05:03:26 2013

  Copyright (c) 1982, 2002, Oracle Corporation.  All rights reserved.

  DBVERIFY - verification starting: FILE = F:\oracle\oradata\orcl\users_1.ora

  DBVERIFY - verification complete

  Total Pages reviewed: 3932320

  Total number of Pages processed (data): 94051

  Total Pages failing (data): 0

  Total number of Pages processed (Index): 19378

  Total Pages failing (Index): 0

  Total number of Pages processed (other): 3753059

  Total number of Pages processed (Seg): 0

  Total Pages failing (Seg): 0

  Total Pages empty: 65832

  Total Pages marked corrupt: 0

  Total Pages influx: 0

  Now I have this tablespace offline in the data file probably not corrupted and no idea how get DB in normal condition.

  UPD: I have data validation by RMAN:

  RMAN > BACKUP VALIDATE DATABASE.

  From backup 30 July 13

  using controlfile target instead of recovery catalog database

  allocated channel: ORA_DISK_1

  channel ORA_DISK_1: sid = 11 devtype = DISK

  channel ORA_DISK_1: from full datafile backupset

  channel ORA_DISK_1: specifying datafile (s) in backupset

  including current controlfile in backupset

  input datafile fno = name=F:\ORACLE\ORADATA\ORCL\USERS_1.ORA 00004

  input datafile fno = name 00002 = F:\ORACLE\ORADATA\ORCL\UNDO. ORA

  input datafile fno = 00003 name = F:\ORACLE\ORADATA\ORCL\USERS. ORA

  input datafile fno = 00001 name = F:\ORACLE\ORADATA\ORCL\SYSTEM. ORA

  channel ORA_DISK_1: complete set of backups, time: 00:33:06

  Backup finished at 30 July 13

  Which would have been check my DB and put the information of blocks corrupt a v $ DATABASE_BLOCK_CORRUPTION, but no! There is nothing:

  SQL > select * from V$ DATABASE_BLOCK_CORRUPTION;

  no selected line

  However, database doesn't open, until I have bad data offline file ^.

  SQL > alter database datafile 'F:\ORACLE\ORADATA\ORCL\USERS_1.ORA' online;

  Database altered.

  SQL > alter database open;

  change the database open

  *

  ERROR on line 1:

  ORA-01113: file 4 should media recovery

  ORA-01110: data file 4: "F:\ORACLE\ORADATA\ORCL\USERS_1.ORA".

  Post edited by: Llywelyn.yv

  I finally found my case corect solution:

  Refer to Metalink notes:

  Note: 158836.1 "Database crashes when DATAFILE is Auto extended from 4 GB"

  Note: 1668488 "UNABLE TO RECOVER DATAFILE THAT HAS AUTO EXTENDED ON A 4 GB LIMIT.

  Bug is fixed in version 8.1.7.4.1, 9.0.1.4.0 and 9.2.0.2.1.

  So I installed the patch, the complete catpatch.sql and catexp.sql and the WHOLE base become to open without a problem)

• In cascade LOVs (APEX 4.1) problem, using in the report does not define values

  Hello
  
  I use APEX 4.1.0.00.32 and I have a simple report as
  
  SQL :*
  
  SELECT * in the region
  Region WHERE the like '% "| P3_REGION | » %'
  and country like "%" | P3_COUNTRY | » %'
  and the city like '% "| P3_CITY | » %'
  
  Elements:*.
  
  P3_REGION:
  Select a separate region as d, r of the region of the region
  
  Display the Null value: YES
  Value null, display value: - Select -
  Return value of NULL: + 0 +.
  
  P3_COUNTRY:
  Select distinct country as d, r of the region of the country where region =: P3_REGION
  
  Display the Null value: YES
  Value null, display value: - Select -
  Return value of NULL: + 0 +.
  Cascading LOV Parent article (s): P3_REGION
  
  P3_CITY:
  + select distinct city, city as the region r, whose country =: P3_COUNTRY
  
  Display the Null value: YES
  Value null, display value: - Select -
  Return value of NULL: + 0 +.
  Cascading LOV Parent article (s): P3_COUNTRY
  
  
  The LOVs work very well and the correct values are displayed if cascade through them
  
  So, I want to the last step to filter the report with the values that were selected in the lovs. And that I does not.
  I tried to add a button with the SUBMISSION of the page. After choosing values in all the LOVs and by clicking on the button SUBMIT page supports, alle LOVs are disabled (with value - select-) and the report shows all lines.
  I tried to change the "redirecting to Page 3" button and setting the values P3_REGION, P3_COUNTRY, P3_CITY P3_REGION., P3_COUNTRY. & P3_CITY. but without success.
  I tried to use the 'Page Action time value' parameter to 'Validate' or 'redirect and set' for all the element LOVs or only the last element LOV, but then the cascade of the LOVs is not working properly and the report does not change.
  
  I am confused as I Don t know what I can do so far. I think this should be a condition easy limit/filter the report with the values in the LOVs.
  In addition, it should be possible to choose only the LOV region and then limit the report with this region (not select country and city)
  
  Thanks in advance!

  I had a problem similar to a previous version, fixed when I updated element Source value or Expression (the section of the Source) to himself.

  I mean:
  for the P3_REGION, defined as & P3_REGION element.
  for the P3_COUNTRY, defined as & P3_COUNTRY element.
  for the P3_CITY, defined as & P3_CITY element.

  It will be useful.

• ORA-600 [kkqtcpcky:ficand]

  Hello
  in10.2.0.4 on AIX I have this error and found on metalink note (1086803.1):

  ORA-600 [kkqtcpcky:ficand]
  SUGGESTIONS:
  
    If the Known Issues section below does not help in terms of identifying
    a solution, please submit the trace files and alert.log to Oracle
    Support Services for further analysis.
  
    Known Issues:
  
  Known Bugs
  
      NB      Bug      Fixed      Description
  
           7353384      10.2.0.5      Assorted internal errors and dumps with fix 4868646 

  I can't find more information on bugs, 7353384 or 4868646.
  
  How can I find something on the 7353384 bug or 4868646?
  
  Thank you.

  in "search" (top right of screen) in metalink you can filter by 'bugs database', simply write the number of the bug for more information about this.

• Show more months in the past and the future

  Hello
  
  We have a requirement for a report view data every month for 6 months in the past 12 months in the future. How limit (filter) the month in the report?
  
  Thank you!

  Another way is like this:

  your column date > = TIMESTAMPADD (SQL_TSI_MONTH,-6, TIMESTAMPADD (SQL_TSI_DAY, 1, TIMESTAMPADD (SQL_TSI_DAY, DAYOFMONTH (CURRENT_DATE) *-1, CURRENT_DATE)))

  AND

  your date column<= timestampadd(sql_tsi_month,="" 12,="" timestampadd(sql_tsi_day,1,timestampadd(sql_tsi_day,="" dayofmonth(current_date)*-1,="">

  This will give you all what 6 months ago at 12 months in the future based on the "date of the day." You can change the CURRENT_DATE if the point of reference should be changed.

• Index and tuning: Linking on the same table

  Hello everyone,
  
  I have a PL/SQL mechanism that is based on a select query which links a table (T_RECHRED) on himself.
  
  Here's the SQL...
  
  SELECT
  DR. LSZ, DR. RECH_ID RECH_ID, GS. RECH_ID GS_ID
  Of
  DR. T_RECHRED, T_RECHRED GS
  WHERE
  DR. DATE_FROM GROUP GS. DATE_FROM
  AND DR. BILL_AMOUNT = GS. BILL_AMOUNT *-1
  AND DR. LSZ = GS. LSZ
  AND DR. ALNR = GS. ALNR
  AND DR.CAT! = 'GS' AND GS.CAT = 'GS '.
  ORDER BY
  DR. LSZ CSA, DR. POSITIONSTEXT1 DESC;
  
  As you can see, the table is joined to itself with the following fields...
  
  DATE_FROM, LSZ, ALNR and BILL_AMOUNT (with GS having the dial-up sign)
  
  Both sides of the join (separation) selection is on the cat 'IS GS' c to one side and 'NOT GS' for the other side. The selection of GS catches / selects several hundred thousand lines, while the 'NO GS' selection selects several million lines.
  
  This query (and the accompanying PL/SQL process) works very well...
  
  -Reduces data volumes
  -With the following filter...
  AND GS. RECH_MONTH IN (200809, 200810)
  ... which returns the same amount of data as a select complete!
  
  ... but seems to work constantly on the volume of data.
  
  The really stupid thing is that I had run it once (full volume) but have reshaped the tables and somehow fail to replicate the index configuration that I had before (it's really stupid of me!)
  
  So, my question is the best way to address such a request?
  
  My thoughts are these:
  
  -J' have my filter clause in the right order? The "GS.CAT = 'GS' is the most 'limit' filter so I put this last." Is this correct?
  -Do I have to put the joints in a "INNER JOIN" clause (leaving the "Cat" filter in the WHERE clause), or it makes no difference?
  -Is that the join on the BILL_AMOUNT with the sign reversed (*-1) impact on performance?
  -J' would have separate index (on each join column)? Or I should have an index composed on the join fields all (or almost)?
  -The ORDER BY clause is important (and cannot be deleted) because the PL/SQL depends on a concrete order.
  
  I've been googling and reading my book "Oracle Tuning" but can not find all the information on the links between the tables on themselves.
  
  Advice you can give me on this, or links to the 'case studies' or 'HOWTO', would be welcome.
  
  Thank you very much
  Alan Searle
  
  PS: I tried to run a "explain plan" and that seems to work through OK but no data (as far as I can see) is written to the "PLAN_TABLE. Any ideas what I'm doing wrong here?

  version of database? I suspect 10g or higher.

  explain plan is now written in a global temporary table, it must be explained and look in the session.

• Filter the limitation on VPN3000 (is it a bug or a specification?)

  Dear all,

  According to Bug ID CSCdw86558 , number of filter that must be created on an internal VPN3000 is limited to '100' for all VPN3000 series. Does anyone have information when this bug? Any consideration to the limit or is it already in the roadmap for the next release?

  Any help will be greatly appreciated.

  Best regards

  Engel

  This bug has been resolved in the 3.5.3 code versions and higher. All codes 3.6.x should understand it. They simply deleted the code checking, so you can now have more than 100 and it won't complain. Now there is no limit on how many filters you may have.

• Is there a limit of 24 rank in a dropdown table filter in Figure 3.6.1?

  Hi, am I wrong in thinking that there is only a limit of 24 rows in a result of the Filter Table? I have more lines of data (client names) which need filtering, but not appear. Is there a possible way to show a list of filters of all unique named rows that exceed this limit.

  Best

  Glen

  Hi Glen,

  The list of distinct values in the drop-down list is limited. You can filter by values that do not appear in the drop-down list via the filter pane that appears on the right after you click sort & filter in the toolbar.

  If you need a list of distinct values in a column (or any range of cells), you can use this copy separate Automator Service (download Dropbox).

  To install, simply to double-click on the downloaded package .workflow and if necessary give permission in system preferences > security & privacy. Be sure also to what automator.app is checked in the accessibility section there.  This creates a new menu choice in your numbers > Services menu.

  To use, simply select the cells you want to retrieve a list of distinct values, choose separate copy in your numbers > Services menu, click once in a cell numbers and command-v to paste.

  SG

• Bug: Playlist using the filter of compilations: reversed filter

  Create a smart playlist, using filter Compilation = yes, displays all the tracks that are not part of a compilation.

  Vice versa: playlist updated Compilation = no, filter shows all the tracks that are part of a compilation.

  The Boolean value of the playlist filter is reversed because of a bug in iTunes.

  I use iTunes 12.3.2.35, 64-bit, German, on Windows 10, 64-bit, German.

  The definition of playlist is like this (translated into English by myself I'm using German installation):

  -Use all of the following criteria

  -Compilation: Yes (or no for reversal)

  -Genre: is 'classic '.

  -No amount of objects

  -Automatically update

  Is this only Compilations or have labels for Yes & No. (true & is false) was mixed for all rules? 12.3.0.44 had problems with the field year in Polish, Portuguese (Portugal, Brazil not) & Greek because incorrect values have been used in localization files. My guess is that there is a similar question.

  TT2

• Limit on the time settings shared filter criteria?

  Does anyone know if there is a limit to the back where the time for shared parameter filters can go? Is there still a limit (as can only look 12 months worth of data), or is it as long as the data is available? I know that in the past there is a limit to how long backdata Eloqua you saved, wasn't sure if it was still the case.

  For example, in a shared filter, I want to set filter criteria for "Contact has opened of group e-mail XXXXX emails in the last 24 months" - it saves, but he will seek in fact to 24 months of data?

  Thank you!

  FYI - met with Eloqua Support, and they have confirmed, there is no time limit in both the area of filters shared and ideas. Their exact response is below:

  For an overview: the answer to your question is that there is no limit. If in Insight do you a range of time custom and select passed 2 years, if there was activity at the time where you will be able to report on this issue. On the contact activity tab, the limit should be 4 months for activities before you can see it is no longer (but it will still exist in Insight and be available for reports).

  For filters Shared: there is no limit as long as the information is on the contact record. If the contact has actually received 3 emails for 4 years we will see this filled in a segment.