LinuxMint17 comments with NAT cannot reach a subnet, why?

Similar Questions

• Guest OS VMware Workstation with NAT cannot communicate with the host

  I often run VMware Workstation on an Ubuntu Linux box and the load of virtual machines inside.

  The default is to configure a network card for the NAT, but that NEVER works, I have never no connectivity to the physical network in my guest operating system until I have change the type of the virtual machine network adapter for bridged.

  However, when I install ESXi 4.1 as a VM bridged, he can see the physical network, but VMs decked inside it can not...  I think that if I am NAT to work he'd let me withdraw my guest as oses nested inside BONE that is a host... If this is meaningless to anyone at all network connectivity prompt.

  I could really use help figure this.  I was hitting my head for weeks and led to nothing.

  If you do not know which IP address to use in the case of NAT, I recommend you temporarily enable DHCP on the Windows 7 host and then run "ipconfig/all" to see what it looks like. To configure the IP settings manually, make a note of the settings and set the IP address of one outside the range NAT NETWORK.

  André

• I need VPN gateway to gateway with NAT for several subnets, RV082

  I have a pair of RV082 routers and I would like to configure a gateway to gateway VPN tunnel, as described in a book, "How to configure a VPN tunnel that routes all traffic to the remote gateway," (name of file Small_business_router_tunnel_Branch_to_Main.doc).  I followed this recipe book and found that my while the main office has internet connectivity, the branch subnet is not an internet connection.

  Routing behaves as advertised, where all traffic goes to the seat.  However, the 192.168.1.0 subnet in the branch receives no internet connectivity.  I read in other posts that the main router will provide only NAT for the local subnet, not the Management Office subnet.  Is it possible to configure the RV082 router to provide NAT for all subnets?

  If this is not the case, what product Cisco will provide connectivity VPN Tunnel as well as the NAT for all subnets?  The RV082 can be used as part of the final solution or are my RV082s a wasted expense?

  Here is the configuration that I had put in place, (real IP and IKE keys are false).

  Bridge to bridge

  Remote Head Office

  Add a new Tunnel

  No de tunnel                  1                                               2

  Name of the tunnel:, n1 n1-2122012_n2-1282012-2122012_n2-1282012

  Interface: WAN1 WAN1

  Enable :                   yes                                             yes

  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Configuration of local groups

  Type of local security gateway: IP only IP only

  IP address: 10.10.10.123 10.10.10.50

  Local security group type: subnet subnet

  IP address: 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.0

  Subnet mask: 255.255.255.0 0.0.0.0

  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  Configuration of the remote control groups

  Remote security gateway type: IP only IP only

  IP address: 65.182.226.50 67.22.242.123

  Security remote control unit Type: subnet subnet

  IP address: 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.0

  Subnet mask: 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0

  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  IPSec configuration

  Input mode: IKE with preshared key IKE with preshared key

  Group of the phase 1 of DH: Group 5 - 1536 bit group 5 - 1536 bit

  Encryption of the phase 1: of THE

  The phase 1 authentication: MD5 MD5

  Step 1 time in HIS life: 2800 2800 seconds

  Perfect Forward Secrecy: Yes Yes

  Group of the phase 2 DH: Group 5 - 1536 bit group 5 - 1536 bit

  Encryption of the phase 2: of THE

  Phase 2 of authentication: MD5 MD5

  Time of the phase 2 of HIS life: 3600 seconds 3600 seconds

  Preshared key: MyKey MYKey

  Minimum complexity of pre-shared key: Enable Yes Enable

  --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

  If you are running 4.x firmware on your RV082, you must add an additional Allow access rule for the Branch Office subnet (considered one of the multiple subnets in the main office) may have access to the internet. Note the firmware version has more details about it.

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/routers/CSBR/rv0xx/release/rv0xx_rn_v4-1-1-01.PDF

• Application of VPN S2S (with NAT)

  Hello experts,

  ASA (8.2) and standard Site 2 Site Internet access related configs.

  Outside: 1.1.1.1/24-> peer IP VPN S2S.

  Inside: Pvt subnets

  Standard "Nat 0' orders and crypto ACL for our remote offices, local networks with IP whp program.

  Requirement:

  Need to connect the PC to external clients (3.3.3.3 & 4.4.4.4) on tcp/443 via vpn S2S on our LAN. Client only accepts only the host with public IPs.

  I need NAT to my internal IP to the public IP say 1.1.1.2 and establish the VPN tunnel between 1.1.1.1-> PRi Client-side & secondary IPs (Cisco router).

  (without losing connectivity to remote offices). No policy NAT work here?

  ex:

  My Intern: 10.0.0.0/8 and 192.168.0.0/16
  Assigned IP available for NAT (some time to connect to the client only): 1.1.1.5

  External client LAN IPs: 3.3.3.3 & 4.4.4.4

  PAT: permit TOCLIENT object-group MYLAN object-group CUSTOMER LAN ip extended access-list

  NAT (inside) 5-list of access TOCLIENT

  5 1.1.1.5 (outside) global
      
   Crypto: tcp host 1.1.1.5 allowed extended CRYPTO access list object-group CUSTOMER LAN eq 443

  Outsidemap 1 crypto card matches the address CRYPTO
   
  Customer will undertake to peer with IP 1.1.1.1 only.

  Do I need a ' Nat 0' configs here?

  Also, for the specifications of the phase 2, it is not transform-set options gives. Info given was

  Phase2: AH: people with mobility reduced, life: 3 600 s, PFS: disabled, LZS Compression: disabled.
  This works with options of the phase 2?

  Thanks in advance

  MS

  Hello

  «Existing NAT (inside) 1 & global (outside) does not interfere with NAT 5 when users try to reach the ClientLAN.»

  Your inside nat index is '1', while the dynamic policy-nat is index '5 '.

  "" For the phase 2 in general, we define Crypto ipsec transform-set TEST ".

  Sure, the remote tunnel peers even accept transform set, everything you put up with the example below and distant homologous put the same tunnel.

  Crypto ipsec transform-set ESP-AES-128-SHA aes - esp esp-sha-hmac

  "In this scenario, no need to define any what and just add empty transform don't set statement under card crypto?

  No you need a defined transformation.

  "3. If we want to limit the destination port 443, I need to use separate VPN filters?

  That's right, use a vpn-filter.

  "4. we have several phase 1 configs, but wanted to use AES256 & DH5 (new policy)"... for s2s, these options work fine. ""

  Of course, you have set the phase 1, as required.

  Thank you

  Rizwan James

• New virtual machine cannot reach gateway all-in-olders Yes

  Hi, I'm using ESXi for a year with no problems, but now I'm having a very strange situation. New virtual machine cannot reach the front door, while the 'old'. New virtual machine can ping olders VM and vice versa, but new looks as private. I tried different OS and still have the same question.

  That's what I have:

  Reference DELL R610 with RAID - 1 and RAID-5

  ESXi free 348481 4.1.0

  1 card NETWORK connected

  IPs public 16

  4 VM (W 2008 32bits, W 2008R2 64, 32 2008 W, W 2008 64) works perfectly

  All VM are stored on the local Datastore2 (raid-5)

  Last week, I installed:

  1 Openfiler ESA (gateway problem)

  1 W 2008 R2 (gateway problem)

  1 W XP 32 (gateway problem)

  1 W 2008 32 (gateway problem)

  Older VM never lose connection with gateway and beyond

  New never manage to bridge

  I can't manually add gateway IP/mac address (error 5) in the new.

  Anyone can figure it out and how to solve? I'm really lost.

  Thank you

  New virtual machine can ping olders VM and vice versa...

  This excludes actually questions 'virtual '. The vSwitch has no restrictions.

  What kind of physical switch are you using? If this is a CISCO switch to ensure that the port is configured as a port of access (or trunk port) and spans tree portfast is. Some CISCO switches have a "macro"set desktop on their ports which limits the number of MAC addresses that are allowed on the port.

  André

  PS: Please don't ask me. Did you check the address of the gateway AND subnet mask are correct for the new virtual machines?

• Continually, I get the error that cannot reach the server while trying to install SP1.

  Win XP Pro reloading, get all updates

  I reinstalled Windows XP Pro and need to update to SP1 to 3 as well as all security updates.  (After download) installation, SP1, I continually get the error that cannot reach the server, visit Web of MS for a version that requires no web access if the problem persists. I can't find this version of SP1 that does not need to happen on the server from Ms.  In addition, isn't there an easier way to get all updates when you perform a new installation instead of going one by one with all the updates?

  If you have SP1A, then you can go straight to the installation of SP3.  If you have SP1, then you need to install SP1A or SP2 before going to SP3.  You can get the updates described in the following article:

  "How to obtain the latest Windows XP service pack"
    <>http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/322389/ >

  HTH,
  JW

• Classic BlackBerry Blackberry classic O10 cannot reach my mail smtp server providers

  I'm trying to set up my new classic of Blackberry to read my emails. My old blackberry curve has been problem free.  BUT even after providing all the exact smtp server and port information, classic BB says that he cannot reach my smtp server outgoing.

  I went through calls to technical support with my phone operator (Vodafone) and my provider to wide band/e-mail (utility warehouse).

  Vodaphone top tech expert says: old blackberry used to connect through the servers of Blackberry which was ok, but new Blackberry communicates directly with the e-mail servers and connect with gmail, Hotmail etc. (Yes, mine will), but it will not connect with individual service providers.  I found it shocking because BB is supposed to be the best quality e-mail feature.

  Utility warehouse (my ISP) tech expert says: Blackberry must provide a fix so that this works.

  Help there must be a solution to this

  Thanks for your detailed response. I'll get the links, but the problem is now resolved.  It dawned on me that my connection attempts were simply delay on my mobile signal, so I tried again when it is connected to my home, Wi - Fi, and Bingo!

• VPN with NAT Interface

  Hello

  I am trying to set up a VPN between a VLAN I have defined and another office. I have been using nat on the interface for internet access with a NAT pool.

  I created the VPN with crypto card and the VPN is successfully registered.

  The problem I encounter is that with NAT is enabled, internet access is working but I can ping through the VPN.

  If I disable NAT, VPN works perfectly, but then him VLAN cannot access the internet.

  What should I do differently?

  Here is the config:

  Feature: 2911 with security package

  Local network: 10.10.104.0/24

  Remote network: 192.168.1.0/24

  Public beach: 65.49.46.68/28

  crypto ISAKMP policy 104

  BA 3des

  preshared authentication

  Group 2

  lifetime 28800

  ISAKMP crypto key REDACTED address 75.76.102.50

  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-sha-hmac strongsha

  OFFICE 104 ipsec-isakmp crypto map

  defined by peer 75.76.102.50

  Set transform-set strongsha

  match address 104

  interface GigabitEthernet0/0

  IP 65.49.46.68 255.255.255.240

  penetration of the IP stream

  NAT outside IP

  IP virtual-reassembly

  full duplex

  Speed 100

  standby mode 0 ip 65.49.46.70

  0 6 2 sleep timers

  standby 0 preempt

  card crypto OFFICE WAN redundancy

  interface GigabitEthernet0/2.104

  encapsulation dot1Q 104

  IP 10.10.104.254 255.255.255.0

  IP nat pool wan_access 65.49.46.70 65.49.46.70 prefix length 28

  overload of IP nat inside source list 99 pool wan_access

  access-list 99 permit 10.10.104.0 0.0.0.255

  access-list 104. allow ip 10.10.104.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

  access-list 104. allow ip 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 10.10.104.0 0.0.0.255

  access-list 104 allow icmp 10.10.104.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

  access-list 104 allow icmp 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255 10.10.104.0 0.0.0.255

  ISAKMP crypto #sh her

  IPv4 Crypto ISAKMP Security Association

  DST CBC conn-State id

  65.49.46.70 75.76.102.50 QM_IDLE 1299 ACTIVE

  Hello!

  Please, make these changes:

  extended Internet-NAT IP access list

  deny ip 10.10.104.0 0.0.0.255 192.168.1.0 0.0.0.255

  IP 10.10.104.0 allow 0.0.0.255 any

  IP nat inside source list Internet-NAT pool access-wan overload

  * Please do not remove the old NAT instance until you add that above.

  Please hold me.

  Thank you!

  Sent by Cisco Support technique Android app

• Acrobat XI cannot reach activation server after update

  XI Acrobat bought for my wife (this is the version that she needs) a few weeks ago.  Did a clean install on a new machine and activated correctly, no problem.  It worked exactly as it should.

  Tonight, she did something really terrible, she agreed to do an update.  At the end there, impossible to reach the Adobe server to activate.

  Troubleshooting, it seems that it cannot reach the Adobe server.  I tried on my machine and I could not reach him; she refuses connections.

  Is this intentional, a way to kill older versions of Acrobat?  She cannot use the newest one, he must be pro XI.  The server still exists?

  Does anyone know a workaround that will repair Acrobat XI on his machine?  Should I delete everything and reinstall from the original CD?  And tell him to NEVER accept "updates?

  I discovered the problem.

  I am the victim of a fraud, the software I bought is fake.  It was a bit

  develop, in that the installation process creates a hosts file which blocked

  all access to any Adobe authentication server address.  Apparently the fake

  Serial number fooled the program itself, but it cannot validate at Adobe.  When my

  wife did the update, for some reason, he attempted to validate again and this is where

  He failed.  I do not know if he would have continued working if she had not

  the upgrade, but I always discourage updates that many end up breaking

  something.  Yes, I know the security implications, but I had two

  orders of magnitude more broken with updates that the security problems if

  will try my luck.

  Now, I'm the money I spent, but since (for compatibility reasons) my wife

  needs XI pro, which is not sold by Adobe, I have little chance.  I have

  don't want a pirated version but, apparently, selling online, at least on ebay, can

  trust.  Techsoft24 in London seems legitimate and I can try it, unless someone

  can suggest a better way to buy a package of Acrobat Pro XI legitimate known.

  Peter

• Assign a static IP to guest with NAT Virt network adapter?

  I'll put up a * nix VM that I want to give out-bound network connectivity, but I want to make its services available only on my local machine (for example MySQL).  VMWare Player with NAT assigned a DHCP address, but because it is not update my host name resolution, to access a service on the client, I need to use the IP address.

  I would like to assign a static IP address on the guest, so I can add an easy to use in the host of my host file.  I can update my guest network interface file to not assign no problem.  I'm worried that I can use an IP address that overlaps the VMWare DHCP pool (and may occur a conflict of address when I turn on a new virtual machine), or outside the range of the virtual switch.

  Is this possible with VMWare Player, and is there something in the configuration files, that I might be able to change this?

  Default 192.168.x.1 address is used for the adapter to the virtual host, 192.168.x.2 as the address of the NAT gateway and 192.168.x.128... 254 for DHCP, which means that you can assign static IP addresses between 192.168.x.3 and... 127.

  However, you can configure rather a reserve in the vmnetdhcp.conf file by adding for example

  host LuckyLuke {}
  Hardware ethernet 00: 0C: 29:23:b6:12;
  fixed-address 192.168.156.77;
  }

  just in front of the brand ' # end ' . Please replace "156" by your own subnet. In the example above, the VMS with MAC address "00: 0C: 29:23:b6:12" will receive the IP "192.168.156.77". BTW. hostname (in this case "LuckyLuke") does not matter, it must just be unique in the file.

  André

• Hello Team Support, I just update iOS to 9.3 and the active stage, then my iPad cannot reach to the apple Server (internet connection is always good in this case). Apple ID

  Hello support team,

  I just updated iOS at 9.3 and the active step then my iPad cannot reach to the apple Server (internet connection is always good in this case). Apple ID & password are still loggin in/out using the iTune software.

  @VietNam country

  See you soon,.

  Thing

  Thing,

  Try again later. Server demand is strong and it's a common problem when a new update has been released.

  

• QX100 supports Android 4.3? I have a Note 3 with Android cannot connect to QX100 4.3?

  QX100 supports Android 4.3? I have a Note 3 with Android cannot connect to QX100 4.3. I continue to connect and their time.

  Here is the solution to stop the QX100 unplug with your smartphone android 4.3:

  1. go to settings

  2. select Wi - Fi

  3. press and hold the DIRECT-XXXXSC-QX100

  4. select Modify network config

  5 click on show advanced options

  6 make the following changes:

  Proxy settings: None

  IP settings: static

  IP address: 10.0.1.2

  Gateway: 10.0.0.1

  Network prefix length: 24

  DNS 1:                               10.0.0.0

• IPSec Tunnel between Cisco 2801 and Netscren 50 with NAT and static

  Hello

  My problem isn't really the IPSec connection between two devices (it is already done...) But my problem is that I have a mail server on the site of Cisco, who have a static NAT from inside to outside. Due to the static NAT, I do not see the server in the VPN tunnel. I found a document that almost describes the problem:

  "Configuration of a router IPSEC Tunnel private-to-private network with NAT and static" (Document ID 14144)

  NAT takes place before the encryption verification!

  In this document, the solution is 'routing policy' using the loopback interface. But, how can I handle this with the Netscreen firewall. Someone has an idea?

  Thanks for any help

  Best regards

  Heiko

  Hello

  Try to change your static NAT with static NAT based policy.

  That is to say the static NAT should not be applicable for VPN traffic

  permissible static route map 1

  corresponds to the IP 104

  access-list 104 refuse host ip 10.1.110.10 10.1.0.0 255.255.0.0

  access-list 104 allow the host ip 10.1.110.10 all

  IP nat inside source static 10.1.110.10 81.222.33.90 map of static route

  HTH

  Kind regards

  GE.

• Comments with single controller 4402 wireless

  You can configure comments with a single controller wireless... all the docs I find have a controller of anchorage

  any help or links would be appreciated

  Altogether. Just set up a new Interface & WLAN with no encryption L2 & WebAuth L3, then add an account of the Ambassador Hall.

  This link should help:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/Partner/Tech/tk722/tk809/technologies_configuration_example09186a008070ba8f.shtml

• Windows 7 Advisor - cannot reach the server

  I installed the Windows 7 advisor and both yesterday and today, he cannot reach the server updates - or before scanning - so it does not work for me.  Any ideas? The server is down? I can access many other things!

  It seems to run normally today.