lower costs

Similar Questions

• Low cost brushless three-phase amplifier

  I use cRIO to request control phase brushless motor three specialty.  NOR has a NI 9505 module for control of motors brushed.  I have not found one for brushless motors.  There are a lot of controllers of third brushless motors integrated in the market.  Will not work for me.  I need to directly control the cRIO output transistors.

  I guess I'm looking for a low-cost three-phase bridge amplifier.  The low cost is necessary because it will be part of an OEM product.  The engine is rated at 40 volts and 10 amps.

  Does anyone have any suggestions?

  Here files gerber and the source files of origin for the Council that I built.  It was designed by EagleCAD, and the final design is drive1.brd.  I don't think that there is an error with this review of the Council, it should be good to go if you built it this way.

  Others that some of bridge-on-chip solutions that I found, there was no option for the units silent, low-power (disks without built control logic in).  Because I wanted to do my own development of control algorithms, it meant that I had to either crack open a trade route or build my own.  Of course, I went the second route.

  Good luck.

• Measurement of low-cost input analog (4-20mA) with data acquisition

  Hello

  I would like to have a very low cost measurement system loop which I can plug in my laptop current:

  I have a load, which is connected to a circuit of air conditioning/signal booster, which output a 4-20mA. I want to measure this current loop signal.

  An idea for the lowest cost system? I think that the most NOR DAQ are too expensive and too exaggerated.

  I have LabVIEW.

  Use of remote sensing current low-value resistance, then measure the fall of voltage through it with the help of an acquisition of data 6008/6009?  They have about $150.

  You will probably need to amplify current-sense with a MAX4372 or similar resistance to achieve a result that allows you to use a reasonable scale on data acquisition.  I measure the current through our products in almost all of our equipment to test in this way.  The size of the resistance of meaning as a result.  The 6008 is accurate enough, but it is not the fastest nor well presented.  But starting at $ 150, they are hard to beat.

• Low-cost servers for virtualization

  I'm looking for 2 servers of low cost which supports x 64 and hardware assisted virtualization.

  I think that Dell PowerEdge T300 is in favour. How does Dell PowerEdge T105?

  
  

• The AEC to Flash 10.3 is available only for low-COST airlines?

  Hello

  I wanted to know if Flash 10.3 AEC function is only available with ACC?

  The AEC swc file I see everywhere is one ACC. Are there the playerglobal.swc specific non - ACC or can we use the swc even where we develop a custom application and not by low-COST airlines?

  Any help is very appreciated.

  Thank you.

  LiveCycle is a Java server that you can integrate Flex. The same playerglobal.swc is used in Flex and Flash. Download the latest (FP11) http://www.adobe.com/support/flashplayer/downloads.html

  --

  Kenneth Kawamoto

  http://www.materiaprima.co.UK/

• Registration of the companies low-cost (RTMFP vs protocols RTMP/S)

  Hey everybody,

  I read through all http://learn.Adobe.com/wiki/display/LCCs/LiveCycle+collaboration+service and read through the forums (even in the FMS side that may be relevant http://forums.adobe.com/message/3345179#3345179 and http://forums.adobe.com/thread/736733 ).  As recording LCC is in beta is missing the right docs for now.

  Could you guys validate/invalidate my hypothesis on the registration of low-COST airlines:
  Note: we require Flash 10.0 and connect LCCS SWC (flash 10.0) currently

  (1) setting < rtc:AdobeHSAuthenticator id = "auth" username = password "{ourUserName}" = "{ourPassword}" protocol = "RTMFP" / > will do the following:
  (a) causes a P2P multicast (which in turn uses UDP and no communication at the service of SUPPLY) between customer sovereign Fund, which means no is / V record steam.

  (2) setting < rtc:AdobeHSAuthenticator id = "auth" username = password "{ourUserName}" = "{ourPassword}" protocol = "RTMPS" / > will do the following:
  (a) cause a TCP via server companies low-cost that will record the A / V broadcasts very well.

  3) what I'd do if we wanted to take advantage of P2P multicasting during the recording of the session of the ACC?  To do something like: http://forums.adobe.com/message/3345179#3345179 ?

  4) according to this: http://learn.adobe.com/wiki/display/lccs/09+Peer-to-Peer+Data+Messaging+and+AV+Multicastin g that we could make the P2P with Flash 10.1 multicast
  (a) maybe I am completely wrong in #1 and #2, and by requiring Flash10.1 for our application, I get the recording work using the RTMFP Protocol?

  Thank you
  Alex G.

  Hi Alex,

  OK - now, when you make P2P RTMFP streaming,

  recording does not work. To work around this problem, we recommended

  either disable RTMFP either by setting StreamManager.maxP2PStreamPublish to 0. In

  the latter case, you would still use RTMFP and UDP and so get most of the

  benefits.

  Answer each of your questions:

  (1) partially correct - RTMFP is required for P2P streaming, but not all

  RTMFP streaming is P2P. For example, once there are more than 3 beneficiaries.

  We automatically hub-and-spoke, because P2P becomes difficult for

  the publication server. You can control this threshold using the

  StreamManager.maxP2PStreamPublish.

  (2) correct. This is a temporary workaround solution - I prefer the 2nd

  workaround solution, using StreamManager.maxP2PStreamPublish = 0, which still allows

  the benefits of RTMFP without using P2P. In the next version, even if you are

  you use RTMFP, once you turn on the recording, he will argue as well

  all broadcast on hub-and-spoke (without change of RTMFP).

  (3) for the moment, there is no way to do P2P streaming with record

  permit. In the future (probably much later), we might have time to allow

  This, but it is quite difficult (perhaps not even possible) and it is not high

  as a priority.

  (4) it is important to separate these issues - requires no P2P RTMFP

  streaming. In fact, most of the benefits of RTMFP (mainly the fact that)

  It is based on UDP) works on the star network. What we have seen is that Multicast

  P2P (activated in 10.1 and rather than direct P2P) is often not a great

  choice for conversations, because multicast introduces a latency more than

  simply using hub-and-spoke.

  hope this helps,

  Nigel

• How to ensure that no data is ever stored on the servers of the low COST airlines?

  In particular, I would like to use the SimpleChat and SharedWhiteboard in a secure application and will not have any data stored on the servers of LCCs (only used to manage the flow of data). At least, I don't want to have data stored between sessions, but the 'sessionDependent' of these two pods property doesn't seem to work (ie. when the value 'true' history of cats and forms of Whiteboard are preserved between sessions).

  I put in a few hooks to clear both at the end of the session and the start of a session, but what I really want, is to ensure that the data never be stored in the first place.

  Is this possible with these pods, or do I need Custom develop something on my own to support this behavior?

  Thank you

  The data are stored only in memory. When "persistent" we check the configuration node and transitional so we don't save this node on the disk.

  If you're really worried about a security breach, you should probably encrypt your messages before you send them through companies low-cost (it should be easy to subclass the current models and encrypt/decrypt points on the fly).

• Low cost intelligent or managed switch with the console interface

  Could someone recommend more low switch cost smart or managed with the interface of the console?

  I only need 4 ports but need to control CLI, telnet, or SSH.

  no downtime

• What is a low cost switch which can speak with Labview?

  Hello! I apologize if this question is in the wrong forum auxiliary; Let me know a more appropriate and I will happily move it.

  I have a chip test with four aircraft on what I measure through an amplifier to lock. Currently, we can make a measurement, then have to physically move the connection to test the following. I would like to automate this process. I hunted around for a cost relatively low switch that can talk with Labview and allow him to select one of the four signals in turn, but did not have much luck. I was wondering if anyone had recommendations or devices that they had worked with.

  Thanks in advance,

  Dan

  Dan,

  I was looking at using reed relays.  Download those with golden contacts so that they work well to currents microampere.  Use a with digital outputs DAQ card to drive the relay.  Before you buy, check current relay coils and exits Digital DAQ hardware.

  Lynn

• I am a student in India, what is the lower cost of the windows7 operating system?

  I exactly want Windows7 professional for single user for personal student cost of the pack

  Hello, Michel Cormier.

  Please see the link below as it show price student Windows software:
  http://www.microsoftstore.com/store/msstore/PD/ProductID.216644200/flyout.true

  I hope this helps.

  Marilyn

• low-cost router with DHCP 66 option

  I'll try to find the lowest cost of the Cisco router with option 66.  I use the router in conjunction with spa50x phones and must be able to ensure the configuration at startup.

  I used the srp521.  It was suggested to use the isa550, but who just got an end of LIFE.  All routers of RV supports, I don't the have not found on a rv110 and I know that's not on the rv042.  It seems to me that it is a feature that should be on a router to a small business.

  Sage

  Sage

  I was also looking for a replacement for the SRP521.  I found this in the Guide of the administrator for the RV180:

  

  

  You can also try emulators of RV here, https://supportforums.cisco.com/community/netpro/small-business/onlinedemos.

  Stephen

• Build lab ESXi for new user. low cost and power, a lot of questions

  I've never touched of ESXi, but a customer is going to have it in place so I want to get familiar with it to some extent. I need a reality check of some of you who know what you're going before I start ordering components. I'm not trying to become an expert to ESXi, I just want to know my way around.

  I would like to build a mini server that uses ESXi, and that hosts Windows 2008 Server to act as a domain controller for my small network. This is the only use for the server and ESXi, but other needs can happen, and I want to be able to test other virtual machines within ESXi.

  I have read through a good number of blog posts on the creation of laboratories of the House, and those who have let me know to a certain extent. But still, like a newb, there are a lot of questions. ESXi is not a normal BONE, and I would like to get things right the first time.

  Given that the box will be on 24/7, I would like to lower energy consumption. Performance is better, but I like to keep the use of the power down. I'm pretty sure I'll be able to do without a video card. I'll go with a kind of small form factor case, and the motherboard will probably mini itx or micro atx.

  Here are some of my ideas, if please correct me or suggest that you feel appropriate.

  1. As far as I know, ESXi and vSphere Client all I need VMware and are free for my use will be.
  2. I'll be able to install x 64 guests in ESXi, correct? (I think if ESXi is running inside vmware workstation, only x 32 guests work?).
  3. Is it true that a single physical NETWORK card is necessary for my simple needs (not really sure on this subject).
  4. I was going to get an i3, but am now wondering if I should opt for a faster chip. I almost always used Intel for my desktop, but would consider AMD if it aligns well (power, graphics, mobo that works well with ESXi). I3 is the less power-hungry, but it's not clear to me that one of the faster chips will pull down a lot more power in standby mode. This server will have a quiet life. If it becomes more than one domain controller, it's ok if the power use goes up. I want to just make sure that it is intended as a DC for a very small network, it uses power as little as possible.
  5. I would get a mobo that has a compatible network of ESXi on that card, but those who seem to be quite rare, or the less difficult to ID. I'm guessing that the integrated nic will be less power hungry? Suggetions mobo?
  6. I'll use a 2.5 hard drive "to save energy

  Indeed. In this network interface cards, Intel 82574 L is of approximately $30, the street.

  To develop further-

  #1 Yes

  #2 Yes, as long as the chipset have VT-x (Intel) or AMD - V (AMD).

  #3 Yes, other network cards is for redundancy, load balancing, and the separation of traffic

  #4-6 should be addressed with the links above.

  Edit - link added to VT - x

• Low cost storage with replication of table

  Alrighty, I hope this one gets a few good answers.  I have a friend of mine who is looking to start its virtualization of its current server room.  Now this isn't something fancy at all I think the more they can be to virtualize servers 15 + and they want to be able to have things like the DRS/HA and so on.  Now the big part of this is we are eager to have a kind of replication in the case of a DR.  Storage with what they will probably be software iSCSI due to further reduce costs.  Now, I have some experience with the help of Open Filer but from my research, I could not know how the functionality of replication table or much less put in place.  I have also worked with HP Lefthand, but I'm not sure of the cost through a license and so on. After virtualized local storage would be best for us to go with regard to budgeting and so on.  I expect comments and recommendations and your experience with storage solutions the.  Appreciate any feed back!

  Kind regards

  Chad King

  VCP

  "If you find this post useful in anyway please give the necessary points.

  Hello chadwickking,

  Falconstor solutions http://www.falconstor.com/ do you check or Open-e? http://www.open-e.com/

  Perhaps this product can help you.

  
  Por don't favor no olvides calificar las responses that you were should o ayuda valiosos.

  Please, do not forget the points of call of the "useful" or "correct" answers

  Best wishes / Saludos

  ________________________________________

  Ing. Diego Quintana ! http://www.images.wisestamp.com/twitter.png! [! [ http://www.images.wisestamp.com/linkedin.png!: http://ar.linkedin.com/in/diegoquintana]

  vExpert 2010 - VCP 410 - VCP 310 - VAC - VTSP

  UNETE al grupo Virtualizacion Español en LinkedIn

  My Linkedin profile

  ! http://feeds.feedburner.com/WetcomGroup.1.gif!

• Why the optimizer ignores Index Fast full Scan when much lower cost?

  Summary (tracking details below) - to improve the performance of a query on more than one table, I created an index on a table that included all the columns referenced in the query. With the new index in place the optimizer is still choosing a full Table Scan on an Index fast full scan. However, by removing the one query tables I reach the point where the optimizer suddenly use the Index Fast Full Scan on this table. And 'Yes', it's a lot cheaper than the full Table Scan it used before. By getting a test case, I was able to get the motion down to 4 tables with the optimizer still ignoring the index and table of 3, it will use the index.
  
  So why the optimizer not chooses the Index Fast Full Scan, if it is obvious that it is so much cheaper than a full Table Scan? And why the deletion of a table changes how the optimizer - I don't think that there is a problem with the number of join permutations (see below). The application is so simple that I can do, while remaining true to the original SQL application, and it still shows this reversal in the choice of access path. I can run the queries one after another, and he always uses a full Table Scan for the original query and Index fast full scan for the query that is modified with a table less.
  
  Watching trace 10053 output for the two motions, I can see that for the original query 4 table costs alone way of ACCESS of TABLE UNIQUE section a full Table Scan. But for the modified query with a table less, the table now has a cost for an Index fast full scan also. And the end of the join cost 10053 does not end with a message about exceeding the maximum number of permutations. So why the optimizer does not cost the IFFS for the first query, when it does for the second, nearly identical query?
  
  This is potentially a problem to do with OUTER joins, but why? The joins between the tables do not change when the single extra table is deleted.
  
  It's on 10.2.0.5 on Linux (Oracle Enterprise Linux). I did not define special settings I know. I see the same behavior on 10.2.0.4 32-bit on Windows (XP).
  
  Thank you
  John
  Blog of database Performance
  
  DETAILS
  I've reproduced the entire scenario via SQL scripts to create and populate the tables against which I can then run the queries. I've deliberately padded table so that the length of the average line of data generated is similar to that of the actual data. In this way the statistics should be similar on the number of blocks and so forth.
  
  System - uname - a

  Linux mysystem.localdomain 2.6.32-300.25.1.el5uek #1 SMP Tue May 15 19:55:52 EDT 2012 i686 i686 i386 GNU/Linux

  Database - v$ version

  Oracle Database 10g Enterprise Edition Release 10.2.0.5.0 - Prod
  PL/SQL Release 10.2.0.5.0 - Production
  CORE    10.2.0.5.0      Production
  TNS for Linux: Version 10.2.0.5.0 - Production
  NLSRTL Version 10.2.0.5.0 - Production

  Original query (complete table below details):

  SELECT 
      episode.episode_id , episode.cross_ref_id , episode.date_required , 
      product.number_required , 
      request.site_id 
  FROM episode 
  LEFT JOIN REQUEST on episode.cross_ref_id = request.cross_ref_id 
       JOIN product ON episode.episode_id = product.episode_id 
  LEFT JOIN product_sub_type ON product.prod_sub_type_id = product_sub_type.prod_sub_type_id 
  WHERE (
          episode.department_id = 2
      and product.status = 'I'
        ) 
  ORDER BY episode.date_required
  ;

  Execution of display_cursor after the execution plan:

  SQL_ID  5ckbvabcmqzw7, child number 0
  -------------------------------------
  SELECT     episode.episode_id , episode.cross_ref_id , episode.date_required ,
  product.number_required ,     request.site_id FROM episode LEFT JOIN REQUEST on
  episode.cross_ref_id = request.cross_ref_id      JOIN product ON episode.episode_id =
  product.episode_id LEFT JOIN product_sub_type ON product.prod_sub_type_id =
  product_sub_type.prod_sub_type_id WHERE (         episode.department_id = 2 and
  product.status = 'I'       ) ORDER BY episode.date_required
  
  Plan hash value: 3976293091
  
  -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  | Id  | Operation             | Name                | Rows  | Bytes |TempSpc| Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
  -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT      |                     |       |       |       | 35357 (100)|          |
  |   1 |  SORT ORDER BY        |                     | 33333 |  1920K|  2232K| 35357   (1)| 00:07:05 |
  |   2 |   NESTED LOOPS OUTER  |                     | 33333 |  1920K|       | 34879   (1)| 00:06:59 |
  |*  3 |    HASH JOIN OUTER    |                     | 33333 |  1822K|  1728K| 34878   (1)| 00:06:59 |
  |*  4 |     HASH JOIN         |                     | 33333 |  1334K|       |   894   (1)| 00:00:11 |
  |*  5 |      TABLE ACCESS FULL| PRODUCT             | 33333 |   423K|       |   103   (1)| 00:00:02 |
  |*  6 |      TABLE ACCESS FULL| EPISODE             |   299K|  8198K|       |   788   (1)| 00:00:10 |
  |   7 |     TABLE ACCESS FULL | REQUEST             |  3989K|    57M|       | 28772   (1)| 00:05:46 |
  |*  8 |    INDEX UNIQUE SCAN  | PK_PRODUCT_SUB_TYPE |     1 |     3 |       |  0   (0)|          |
  -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  
  Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
  ---------------------------------------------------
     3 - access("EPISODE"."CROSS_REF_ID"="REQUEST"."CROSS_REF_ID")
     4 - access("EPISODE"."EPISODE_ID"="PRODUCT"."EPISODE_ID")
     5 - filter("PRODUCT"."STATUS"='I')
     6 - filter("EPISODE"."DEPARTMENT_ID"=2)
     8 - access("PRODUCT"."PROD_SUB_TYPE_ID"="PRODUCT_SUB_TYPE"."PROD_SUB_TYPE_ID")

  Updated the Query:

  SELECT 
      episode.episode_id , episode.cross_ref_id , episode.date_required , 
      product.number_required , 
      request.site_id 
  FROM episode 
  LEFT JOIN REQUEST on episode.cross_ref_id = request.cross_ref_id 
       JOIN product ON episode.episode_id = product.episode_id 
  WHERE (
          episode.department_id = 2
      and product.status = 'I'
        ) 
  ORDER BY episode.date_required
  ;

  Execution of display_cursor after the execution plan:

  SQL_ID  gbs74rgupupxz, child number 0
  -------------------------------------
  SELECT     episode.episode_id , episode.cross_ref_id , episode.date_required ,
  product.number_required ,     request.site_id FROM episode LEFT JOIN REQUEST on
  episode.cross_ref_id = request.cross_ref_id      JOIN product ON episode.episode_id =
  product.episode_id WHERE (         episode.department_id = 2     and product.status =
  'I'       ) ORDER BY episode.date_required
  
  Plan hash value: 4250628916
  
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  | Id  | Operation              | Name        | Rows  | Bytes |TempSpc| Cost (%CPU)| Time     |
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  |   0 | SELECT STATEMENT       |             |       |       |       | 10515 (100)|          |
  |   1 |  SORT ORDER BY         |             | 33333 |  1725K|  2112K| 10515   (1)| 00:02:07 |
  |*  2 |   HASH JOIN OUTER      |             | 33333 |  1725K|  1632K| 10077   (1)| 00:02:01 |
  |*  3 |    HASH JOIN           |             | 33333 |  1236K|       |   894   (1)| 00:00:11 |
  |*  4 |     TABLE ACCESS FULL  | PRODUCT     | 33333 |   325K|       |   103   (1)| 00:00:02 |
  |*  5 |     TABLE ACCESS FULL  | EPISODE     |   299K|  8198K|       |   788   (1)| 00:00:10 |
  |   6 |    INDEX FAST FULL SCAN| IX4_REQUEST |  3989K|    57M|       |  3976   (1)| 00:00:48 |
  ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  
  Predicate Information (identified by operation id):
  ---------------------------------------------------
     2 - access("EPISODE"."CROSS_REF_ID"="REQUEST"."CROSS_REF_ID")
     3 - access("EPISODE"."EPISODE_ID"="PRODUCT"."EPISODE_ID")
     4 - filter("PRODUCT"."STATUS"='I')
     5 - filter("EPISODE"."DEPARTMENT_ID"=2)

  Creating the table and Population:
  1 create tables
  2. load data
  3 create indexes
  4. collection of statistics
  

  --
  -- Main table
  --
  create table episode (
  episode_id number (*,0),
  department_id number (*,0),
  date_required date,
  cross_ref_id varchar2 (11),
  padding varchar2 (80),
  constraint pk_episode primary key (episode_id)
  ) ;
  --
  -- Product tables
  --
  create table product_type (
  prod_type_id number (*,0),
  code varchar2 (10),
  binary_field number (*,0),
  padding varchar2 (80),
  constraint pk_product_type primary key (prod_type_id)
  ) ;
  --
  create table product_sub_type (
  prod_sub_type_id number (*,0),
  sub_type_name varchar2 (20),
  units varchar2 (20),
  padding varchar2 (80),
  constraint pk_product_sub_type primary key (prod_sub_type_id)
  ) ;
  --
  create table product (
  product_id number (*,0),
  prod_type_id number (*,0),
  prod_sub_type_id number (*,0),
  episode_id number (*,0),
  status varchar2 (1),
  number_required number (*,0),
  padding varchar2 (80),
  constraint pk_product primary key (product_id),
  constraint nn_product_episode check (episode_id is not null) 
  ) ;
  alter table product add constraint fk_product 
  foreign key (episode_id) references episode (episode_id) ;
  alter table product add constraint fk_product_type 
  foreign key (prod_type_id) references product_type (prod_type_id) ;
  alter table product add constraint fk_prod_sub_type
  foreign key (prod_sub_type_id) references product_sub_type (prod_sub_type_id) ;
  --
  -- Requests
  --
  create table request (
  request_id number (*,0),
  department_id number (*,0),
  site_id number (*,0),
  cross_ref_id varchar2 (11),
  padding varchar2 (80),
  padding2 varchar2 (80),
  constraint pk_request primary key (request_id),
  constraint nn_request_department check (department_id is not null),
  constraint nn_request_site_id check (site_id is not null)
  ) ;
  --
  -- Activity & Users
  --
  create table activity (
  activity_id number (*,0),
  user_id number (*,0),
  episode_id number (*,0),
  request_id number (*,0), -- always NULL!
  padding varchar2 (80),
  constraint pk_activity primary key (activity_id)
  ) ;
  alter table activity add constraint fk_activity_episode
  foreign key (episode_id) references episode (episode_id) ;
  alter table activity add constraint fk_activity_request
  foreign key (request_id) references request (request_id) ;
  --
  create table app_users (
  user_id number (*,0),
  user_name varchar2 (20),
  start_date date,
  padding varchar2 (80),
  constraint pk_users primary key (user_id)
  ) ;
  
  prompt Loading episode ...
  --
  insert into episode
  with generator as 
  (select rownum r
            from (select rownum r from dual connect by rownum <= 1000) a,
                 (select rownum r from dual connect by rownum <= 1000) b,
                 (select rownum r from dual connect by rownum <= 1000) c
           where rownum <= 1000000
         ) 
  select r, 2,
      sysdate + mod (r, 14),
      to_char (r, '0000000000'),
      'ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ' || to_char (r, '000000')
    from generator g
  where g.r <= 300000
  /
  commit ;
  --
  prompt Loading product_type ...
  --
  insert into product_type
  with generator as 
  (select rownum r
            from (select rownum r from dual connect by rownum <= 1000) a,
                 (select rownum r from dual connect by rownum <= 1000) b,
                 (select rownum r from dual connect by rownum <= 1000) c
           where rownum <= 1000000
         ) 
  select r, 
         to_char (r, '000000000'),
         mod (r, 2),
         'ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRST' || to_char (r, '000000')
    from generator g
  where g.r <= 12
  /
  commit ;
  --
  prompt Loading product_sub_type ...
  --
  insert into product_sub_type
  with generator as 
  (select rownum r
            from (select rownum r from dual connect by rownum <= 1000) a,
                 (select rownum r from dual connect by rownum <= 1000) b,
                 (select rownum r from dual connect by rownum <= 1000) c
           where rownum <= 1000000
         ) 
  select r, 
         to_char (r, '000000'),
         to_char (mod (r, 3), '000000'),
         'ABCDE' || to_char (r, '000000')
    from generator g
  where g.r <= 15
  /
  commit ;
  --
  prompt Loading product ...
  --
  -- product_id prod_type_id prod_sub_type_id episode_id padding 
  insert into product
  with generator as 
  (select rownum r
            from (select rownum r from dual connect by rownum <= 1000) a,
                 (select rownum r from dual connect by rownum <= 1000) b,
                 (select rownum r from dual connect by rownum <= 1000) c
           where rownum <= 1000000
         ) 
  select r, mod (r, 12) + 1, mod (r, 15) + 1, mod (r, 300000) + 1,
         decode (mod (r, 3), 0, 'I', 1, 'C', 2, 'X', 'U'),
         dbms_random.value (1, 100), NULL
    from generator g
  where g.r <= 100000
  /
  commit ;
  --
  prompt Loading request ...
  --
  -- request_id department_id site_id cross_ref_id varchar2 (11) padding 
  insert into request
  with generator as 
  (select rownum r
            from (select rownum r from dual connect by rownum <= 1000) a,
                 (select rownum r from dual connect by rownum <= 1000) b,
                 (select rownum r from dual connect by rownum <= 1000) c
           where rownum <= 10000000
         ) 
  select r, mod (r, 4) + 1, 1, to_char (r, '0000000000'),
  'ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz01234567890123456789' || to_char (r, '000000'),
  'ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZabcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz0123456789012345678' || to_char (r, '000000')
    from generator g
  where g.r <= 4000000
  /
  commit ;
  --
  prompt Loading activity ...
  --
  -- activity activity_id user_id episode_id request_id (NULL) padding 
  insert into activity
  with generator as 
  (select rownum r
            from (select rownum r from dual connect by rownum <= 1000) a,
                 (select rownum r from dual connect by rownum <= 1000) b,
                 (select rownum r from dual connect by rownum <= 1000) c
           where rownum <= 10000000
         ) 
  select r, mod (r, 50) + 1, mod (r, 300000) + 1, NULL, NULL
    from generator g
  where g.r <= 100000
  /
  commit ;
  --
  prompt Loading app_users ...
  --
  -- app_users user_id user_name start_date padding 
  insert into app_users
  with generator as 
  (select rownum r
            from (select rownum r from dual connect by rownum <= 1000) a,
                 (select rownum r from dual connect by rownum <= 1000) b,
                 (select rownum r from dual connect by rownum <= 1000) c
           where rownum <= 10000000
         ) 
  select r, 
         'User_' || to_char (r, '000000'),
         sysdate - mod (r, 30),
         'ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ' || to_char (r, '000000')
    from generator g
  where g.r <= 1000
  /
  commit ;
  --
  
  prompt Episode (1)
  create index ix1_episode_cross_ref on episode (cross_ref_id) ;
  --
  prompt Product (2)
  create index ix1_product_episode on product (episode_id) ;
  create index ix2_product_type on product (prod_type_id) ;
  --
  prompt Request (4)
  create index ix1_request_site on request (site_id) ;
  create index ix2_request_dept on request (department_id) ;
  create index ix3_request_cross_ref on request (cross_ref_id) ;
  -- The extra index on the referenced columns!!
  create index ix4_request on request (cross_ref_id, site_id) ;
  --
  prompt Activity (2)
  create index ix1_activity_episode on activity (episode_id) ;
  create index ix2_activity_request on activity (request_id) ;
  --
  prompt Users (1)
  create unique index ix1_users_name on app_users (user_name) ;
  --
  prompt Gather statistics on schema ...
  --
  exec dbms_stats.gather_schema_stats ('JB')

  10053 sections - original query

  ***************************************
  SINGLE TABLE ACCESS PATH
    -----------------------------------------
    BEGIN Single Table Cardinality Estimation
    -----------------------------------------
    Table: REQUEST  Alias: REQUEST
      Card: Original: 3994236  Rounded: 3994236  Computed: 3994236.00  Non Adjusted: 3994236.00
    -----------------------------------------
    END   Single Table Cardinality Estimation
    -----------------------------------------
    Access Path: TableScan
      Cost:  28806.24  Resp: 28806.24  Degree: 0
        Cost_io: 28738.00  Cost_cpu: 1594402830
        Resp_io: 28738.00  Resp_cpu: 1594402830
  ******** Begin index join costing ********
    ****** trying bitmap/domain indexes ******
    Access Path: index (FullScan)
      Index: PK_REQUEST
      resc_io: 7865.00  resc_cpu: 855378926
      ix_sel: 1  ix_sel_with_filters: 1
      Cost: 7901.61  Resp: 7901.61  Degree: 0
    Access Path: index (FullScan)
      Index: PK_REQUEST
      resc_io: 7865.00  resc_cpu: 855378926
      ix_sel: 1  ix_sel_with_filters: 1
      Cost: 7901.61  Resp: 7901.61  Degree: 0
    ****** finished trying bitmap/domain indexes ******
  ******** End index join costing ********
    Best:: AccessPath: TableScan
           Cost: 28806.24  Degree: 1  Resp: 28806.24  Card: 3994236.00  Bytes: 0
  ***************************************

  10053 - updated the Query

  ***************************************
  SINGLE TABLE ACCESS PATH
    -----------------------------------------
    BEGIN Single Table Cardinality Estimation
    -----------------------------------------
    Table: REQUEST  Alias: REQUEST
      Card: Original: 3994236  Rounded: 3994236  Computed: 3994236.00  Non Adjusted: 3994236.00
    -----------------------------------------
    END   Single Table Cardinality Estimation
    -----------------------------------------
    Access Path: TableScan
      Cost:  28806.24  Resp: 28806.24  Degree: 0
        Cost_io: 28738.00  Cost_cpu: 1594402830
        Resp_io: 28738.00  Resp_cpu: 1594402830
    Access Path: index (index (FFS))
      Index: IX4_REQUEST
      resc_io: 3927.00  resc_cpu: 583211030
      ix_sel: 0.0000e+00  ix_sel_with_filters: 1
    Access Path: index (FFS)
      Cost:  3951.96  Resp: 3951.96  Degree: 1
        Cost_io: 3927.00  Cost_cpu: 583211030
        Resp_io: 3927.00  Resp_cpu: 583211030
    Access Path: index (FullScan)
      Index: IX4_REQUEST
      resc_io: 14495.00  resc_cpu: 903225273
      ix_sel: 1  ix_sel_with_filters: 1
      Cost: 14533.66  Resp: 14533.66  Degree: 1
  ******** Begin index join costing ********
    ****** trying bitmap/domain indexes ******
    Access Path: index (FullScan)
      Index: IX4_REQUEST
      resc_io: 14495.00  resc_cpu: 903225273
      ix_sel: 1  ix_sel_with_filters: 1
      Cost: 14533.66  Resp: 14533.66  Degree: 0
    Access Path: index (FullScan)
      Index: IX4_REQUEST
      resc_io: 14495.00  resc_cpu: 903225273
      ix_sel: 1  ix_sel_with_filters: 1
      Cost: 14533.66  Resp: 14533.66  Degree: 0
    ****** finished trying bitmap/domain indexes ******
  ******** End index join costing ********
    Best:: AccessPath: IndexFFS  Index: IX4_REQUEST
           Cost: 3951.96  Degree: 1  Resp: 3951.96  Card: 3994236.00  Bytes: 0
  ***************************************

  I mentioned that it is a bug related to the ANSI SQL standard and transformation probably.

  As suggested/asked in my first reply:
  1. If you use a no_query_transformation then you should find that you get the use of the index (although not in the plan you would expect)
  2. If you use the traditional Oracle syntax, then you should not have the same problem.

• Lower cost of query sql... but more time to fetch the records...

  Hello
  I have a 'strange' with a db view situation facing costly.
  I tried to reduce the cost of the overview

  specifically for 223 records fetched{the cost from 149 reduced to 74,
  
                                                         the recursive calls from 796 reduced to 224,
  
                                                         the consistent gets from 311516 reduced to 310341,
  
                                                          the physical reads from 7 reduced to 0}
  
  but the amount of time needed to fetch the results is greater than the old version of the db view....{it may be the double...}
  
  Have you any idea about this...????
  
  
  
  Note: I have got fresh statistics...
  
           I use db 10g v.2
  
  
  
  
  
  Thanks,
  
  Sim 

  Try to trace the query and see what tkprofs shows you.
  ALTER session set events 10046 trace context name forever, level 12';
  Run the query
  "ALTER session set events ' trace 10046 name context off."

  Then, run tkprofs on the file path to see where the database devoted his time and effort. Do the same for the baseline query in a different session (so you will generate a different trace file).

  If that does not produce something useful, try to use
  "ALTER session set events ' trace 10053 name context forever."
  Run the query
  "ALTER session set events ' trace 10053 name context off."

  Then examine the trace file to see if you can learn anything.

  Given that you have given us something more to go, it's all the help I can give...