Mask not exporting do not

Similar Questions

• Mask not filling of form

  I don't know if my discussion title adequately describes my problem.

  I use an adjustment layer to create a saturation mask. I used the pen tool to create a form, and the complexity, I set this form based almost on a frame-to-frame.

  However, I noticed that when I move the vertices of the form, filling in the mask does not fulfill the entire shape.

  

  What happens here? What I am doing wrong? And how do I fix it?

  Any help would be greatly appreciated.

  You meet that because the shape of your mask will your boundries/size adjustment layer oudside - at least it looks like this screen you have added here.
  So if this is the case... just makeyour setting sets a size of the model.

• menu of mask not appearing modes do not?

  Not trying to complete an assignment of hiding on a roof with blue sky and its replacement with a jpg image, but when I create the mask and go to set mode mask, there is no menu as there is in the diagram in our manual (Adobe after effects CC 2014 version Classroom in a Book). I have attached a screenshot where I'm stuck on the After Effects software. Any help is very appreciated!

  

  Your mask is not closed. NO options are available, until you close your mask. Select the pen tool, select the mask end point, complete the mask and path options will appear.

  

• Layer mask not 100 percent

  I used the quick mask in Photoshop CS6 to lift a selection from a photograph very busy on a new layer, so I could refine the mask. I added a layer based on the selection mask and mask the unwanted parts. Then, I click with the right button on the image of the layer and chose to select pixels and to my surprise what has been selected, it was what I first copied in the new layer. The area that I added to the master showed that it was transparent, but it wasn't somehow. I checked my brush to ensure that the merger was normal and opacity and hardness was 100% and that black was 0, 0, 0 RGB or K = 100%. After deaf and hit around and provision of oath, I arrived at a work around, but it looked kludgy. What I'm fighting against?

  "Select Pixels" does not take into account of layer masks.

  cmd-alt-shift-click on icon in the Panel layer mask layers would intersect it with an existing selection (if you can have meant with workaround).

• mask not to publish?

  When im in the document, the mask is at work, and if I drag the timeline to preview works well, but if I "test movie" it does not show the hidden part... what could be wrong? Here is a small sample
  
  Thank you to everyone who contributes to

  dzedward wrote:
  > o now I see, its because I don't change the scene to the right size in
  > the snippit. It should be 1200 X 900 h...
  >
  > Here's what I see when I test my movie
  > http://www.damonedwards.net/temp/Untitled-1.gif

  Sorry can not help you, it works here without problem and Im using your file without any
  changes. Just the size step, nothing else.
  http://flashfugitive.com/1234.gif

  try to change the fonts, the fonts on your computer may not be appropriate.

  --
  Best regards

  Urami

  --

  
  If you want to send me a message - DO NOT LAUGH at MY ADDRESS
  

• using adjustment layer mask not paint it white to reveal the adjustment

  I added the adjustment layer for the image, changed to black with the white foreground color I am unable to reveal the adjustment

  

  Should not be a problem. Check your brush Blend Mode in the Options bar

• CS4: Does not mask the layer effects. Bug?

  If you have an image of say a person and an effect (a drop shadow maybe) and then apply a layer mask on the size of the feet, the result should be the size up anyone with a fading shadow identical to the person. That's how CS3 it.

  NOT SO, in CS4. With CS4, the layer mask not "mask" effect. So, you get dark legs, but the body is hidden.

  I'm positive, it's a bug, because I can open the bad image of CS4 CS3 AND it seems correct.

  Attached is the same file I created in CS4 (with shadow to come through transparent surface) and then he opened in CS3 (clean, no shade).

  Since you are positive it is a bug, I guess that there is no sense, which suggested that referred you to your dialog layer styles, click on the merge options panel and click layer mask hides in advanced mixing options. Bugs must be fixed by engineers, not the users, so I think that this post is a waste of your time.

• Hi there I can not choose colors in photoshop. He let me just use grey and Pentecost. someone at - he had that before?

  Hi all

  IM new to Photoshop, but did a few things with him.

  I have a problem at the point where I can not choose what color I would like to use in photoshop. I can only use gray and white.

  Any help would be great.

  JJMack is right. Most of the time this happens when you have a channel, or a selected layer mask, not a pixel layer. Open the channels Panel to see exactly what is active. The RGB channel at the top should be active. It is, you can choose colors beyond black and white. If you are on an adjustment layer, you implement a layer with pixels.

• Then... Photoshop won't let you change the form inside a mask unrelated now?

  Anyone else having the problem of scaling a form inside a mask not linked?

  Before the update I could do without the mask. After the last update, it evolves the mask even without him being related.

  You can always push the autour images without changing the mask... but scaling scales the mask.

  Not that I can't get around that problem, but WTF.

  "FOR THE LOVE...". OF... GOD, LET JUST WIDE BOY SHAPE PRETTY ON THE INSIDE OF THE MASK! »

  -Chris Farley

  I can't repro this, but there are conditions. Steps to follow:

  • Create a document of any type.
  • Create a shape of any type by using the shape tools. Add a layer mask and he break the link.
  • Here is the conditional part: select one of the other tools (like the move tool). Target tile form. Try to turn the form using Ctrl/Cmd + T. The shape and the mask of her resize. This does not happen with other types of layer (as of rasterized images).

  The only way I could not repro is to date if I have a selected shape tool; so I'm able to transform as usual.

• How can I view the 50% (red) lith Smart filter mask?

  I use more in addition to dynamic objects in PSCC2015 but can't seem to activate the option overlay mask to a smart object.

  The mask overlay will normally display with a mask of 50% red (lith) over the image, to help me with precision masking.

  To be clear, it's the smart filter that I am wanting to mask, not the smart object.

  In a workflow of chip non-object layer, option-click, and manipulation of the backslash key reveals the superposition of mask, just like the quick mask (Q) in non-couches mode.

  Here's what I'm working with:

  

  So, how do you surface mask smart filter?

  I'm on Mac with OSX10.11.4, I'm photographer pro with experience of Photoshop and usually only get really confused when I don't have any idea what should be the expression of search for 22 years.

  Adrian Malloch

  www.Malloch.co.nz

  Enable/disable smart filter decorative mask

  Thumbnail of the mask filtering shift + Option-click

• Creation / resizing mask

  Hello.

  I'm from Vegas Pro and begins to get used to the body. What I want to do, is to create a very simple rectangular mask, not to apply effects, just to crop my video so that I can mount two clips on the screen, to the left, to the right. In Las Vegas, I could easily create a rectangular mask by drawing myself. In the body, the best way that I found to so far has been to apply a mask to the opacity. However, whenever I click on this small rectangle to create the mask, the rectangle is created, I don't have the ability to draw myself. So I can either drag the four points independently, which is extremely painful, or I can resize now shift, but forcing the proportions. Is there a way to adjust the size of the mask we will tell, trailing only one side of it, which for me is the more instinctive way to do it, but I can't understand it.

  See screenshot below.

  Thank you.

  

  Similar to how it is done sequels - by using the selection tool, click down and drag on the two items that you want to move together (they boxes fill in color when it is selected) to select, and then click one of the selected boxes and move the line. Hold down the SHIFT key to contain the movement of the line at right angles.

  MtD

• Vector mask in Adobe Photoshop CS6 no longer works?

  I got CS6 for about a year now and it worked perfectly... However, last month, I noticed that my vector mask not working. It used to be a small black icon that would show where I erased (or "colorful above") things - now that is just ... not only that, but he seems to have lost most, if not all, of its features. It does the OPPOSITE of what I want to do. I read somewhere that if you put "target path", we can fix things, but photoshop won't let me click on this option... I tried to restart my computer and I tried to reset photoshop to its original settings, and nothing has worked! Help, please.

  The vector mask settings are rigid, so if you used the option subtract when making a path, it will stick to that. Simply select the icon path combine in the main menu bar.

• Animate sketches (and the drawing hand) with multiple masks

  I want to animate a bunch of illustrations (with 100 + items path) I'll draw inside the Illustrator with my WACOM Tablet and later add my hand trajectory draw live.

  What I did to import the .ai final layer (comp size 1080), add the path by copy / paste as a mask (or better than 100 + masks) and apply build > effect of race. I'm done with a nice animation of my illustration, without using the tool path in AE.

  Now I want to copy & paste the trace of mask or the motion on the position of the image of my hand. Problem is: it works, simply select and copy drawn mask, not several masks.

  Is there a way to access the data of position out of the edge effect or a way to copy the data from the exact position of the trajectory do correspond to the actual position of the effect of the stroke?

  It would be great!

  Not really. Masks are inaccessible to expressions and therefore, we could write a lot of code to restore the formula convert them underlying and remap the percentage. Simply keyframe everything by hand. It can be tedious, but it's always a faster way to get there that brooding on how smart-assy with expressions, convoluted scripts or something else...

  Mylenium

• The masks need images to match the size of the sequence or they work with a different scale.

  Now, it is normal to film 4 k for 1080 chronologies, speedgrade will be able to use masks, not taking into account the difference between chronology and images of size?

  I guess, you take a 4K and using the first Panel, applying the motion effect in the position and scale to fit in a sequence of 1080 and then directly link Speedgrade, apply a mask and missing his target.

  Work is about to lower the motion effect in the first Panel. But you can't reduce the motion effect, you must apply the effect of transformation.

  I mean by this is:

  -do not apply the motion effect

  -apply the transformation effect (it has the same position and scale under the effect of movement and can be rearranged because of first z-order)

  This effect is found in the effects of first under Video Effects Panel-deformation-transform

  and apply your Speedgrade Lumetri above the kind your masks are lining up for target.

• Question about the functionality of vector mask

  Hello everyone, I'm fairly new to Photoshop CS 5 so I apologize if I'm asking the wrong type of questions, here goes:

  When you work with vector masks you can:

  (1) "the link" or a vector mask with the other images? ' sharing ' a picture (for example) if I did 'A Building' then duplicated, but wanted to change what build a looked like, I have to only change the mask of the source, then the copies would be updated.

  (2) move the independent image of the vector mask (it seems that I can only move the vector mask, not the image itself). Or in other words: I can move the image and have the mask to follow, instead of being only able to move the vector mask within the limits of the image?

  My application of the question:

  I do a top-down 2D layout of a zone of type "Paste". I did to fill the buildings, building A, B, C, etc. and use multiple copies of each building. Ideally, I would like to be able to 'link' or share say building has a vector mask with all other instances of building A (so that when I change the master, they all change to the new form of mask). The second behavior I have trying to find is the ability to move without moving layer where the vector mask is on this layer (since it seems that you can only move where the mask is, which means that even if I could share masks, they all finish by in the same sense of place I have to re - position each hand again.)

  Any ideas are appreciated, thank you for reading.

  When you work with vector masks you can:

  (1) "the link" or a vector mask with the other images? ' sharing ' a picture (for example) if I did 'A Building' then duplicated, but wanted to change what build a looked like, I have to only change the mask of the source, then the copies would be updated.

  Yes, it's possible, but not with the classic system layer vector mask in Photoshop. Layer masks are part of a layer and not the layers themselves, so that they can be converted into a reusable object.

  The solution is to avoid vector layer masks and use a clipping/layer instead mask. A clipping/layer mask CAN be converted into a smart object that is reusable, and when you change one, all the other instances are also changing.

  The second part of the solution is to convert the layers contained both the clipping/layer to a smart object mask. Then the batch group. By the way, if your buildings are made up of several elements simply to include these additional elements in the clipping group. Another advantage is that each of the elements may still have its own normal layer mask. Win win situation. And layer effects can be applied to layers/clipping masks, once again what is impossible for layer masks. It also opens the doors to a much less destructive workflow.

  (2) move the independent image of the vector mask (it seems that I can only move the vector mask, not the image itself). Or in other words: I can move the image and have the mask to follow, instead of being only able to move the vector mask within the limits of the image?

  This is also solved with the use of layers/clipping masks - the content and the mask can be moved independently in regular layers. Another advantage is that the two can also be transformed individually.

  My application of the question:

  I do a top-down 2D layout of a zone of type "Paste". I did to fill the buildings, building A, B, C, etc. and use multiple copies of each building. Ideally, I would like to be able to 'link' or share say building has a vector mask with all other instances of building A (so that when I change the master, they all change to the new form of mask). The second behavior I have trying to find is the ability to move without moving layer where the vector mask is on this layer (since it seems that you can only move where the mask is, which means that even if I could share masks, they all finish by in the same sense of place I have to re - position each hand again.)

  Any ideas are appreciated, thank you for reading.

  So here's my solution. I made a sample with two buildings, the view from above which could be reused as desired:

  (1) first of all create groups for each building and place the content to those. Then trace layer vector shapes on the content. Set the transparency for layers of mask to a reasonable of opacity for masking easier.

  

  (2) put the vector shape under the layer of content for each building. Then, for (1) and (2), , click on the border between the content and the shape layer. (for Mac), this will hide the enrichment of the content. (3) remember to layer for shape layers opacity to 100%!

  

  (3) then we will turn this building into recyclable items. Convert each content and layer to a smart object clipping mask. Then rename these layers of dynamic object into something sensible (honestly, I forgot to label the layers well earlier, but you catch my meaning here ;-)

  

  Fact! To clone each building, duplicate layer groups. For each instance that you can move the content (which is handy if you share multiple charts of building in the same bitmap or illustrator file), or you can decide to move the mask in place. Or both. It is the same for the transformation. Your choice. To move or transform a building, select the layer group.

  To change or modify the masks or the contents, double-click the smart object of your choice and make a few changes.

  Also, remember that you can insert additional elements in a clipping group by placing it over the first layer and then clipped by clicking again on the border between them. So, in theory, you could start building different looking buildings by adding other dynamic objects in clipping groups. The sky is the limit! In this way, you can create several building blocks to build various buildings with different looks. And still limit the number of blocks - and any update-able.

  Unfortunately, that's when the workflow breaks down a bit: due to the implementation of the object dynamic in Photoshop, you can't change the mask or the contents of the building in context - instead, it opens in its own window of file. This can be somewhat mitigated by placing the two windows side by side (window-> fix--> double vertical installation).

  This brings us to the second caveat: when you make a change, the changes are not updated in real time in the master document. You must first save it. Still a bit of a flow of work, but when same breaker... At least you now have a workflow not destructive instantiated.

  The content of the dynamic object can be replaced easily with a right-click of the mouse on the smart object layer itself. Or use a dynamic object referenced externally instead if you prefer to generate your buildings in an external application.

  BTW, the layer of Photoline system is much more logical and easier to use for this type of work. Layer masks behave like regular diapers. Layers, groups, masks, layers of external file and so forth can be practically cloned and instantiated as smart objects, but the main object is editable in the context, and all the other instances updated in real time. So, it is more convenient. At least this is my experience.

  I hope this has been helpful! Now go build your cities. :-)

  PS: I thought: isn't Illustrator or InDesign is a much more logical choice for this type of work where you need access to reusable blocks of content? It would also be a more efficient workflow and faster - Photoshop is not really designed for this type of work. Illustrator and InDesign provide potentially out of better quality. You can also divide your work into the pages and so on. Here again, you would probably lose the flexibility of smart objects.