Memory ate

Hello! I have a problem with my Sansa Fuze 8 GB. A few weeks ago, I thought to change the music I had on my drive so I have plugged into the PC, deleted all files, chose new ones and I wanted to copy on the "rocket", but he showed me that I don't have enough space which was kind of weird because I chose only 6 GB. I tried to format it, but even after formatting it showed me that I don't have 5, 5 GB of free, other 2, 5 GB was used. My music downloaded but after another week or so I lost a part of the music, it now shows me that I have about 2, 8 GB of free space, rest is used all the time. Formatting does not help, firmware update did not help either. Any suggestions?

Exactly how you format it? It is preferable to use the Format option in the settings menu and let the format itself.

Tags: SanDisk Sansa

Similar Questions

  • Disappearance of Smartphones blackBerry e-mails, which has a * permanent solution?

    Every week or two, my Blackberry just up and decides to remove 80-90% of my Inbox. Now, I am well aware that this is happening because my integrated device memory ate, and I took the steps as much as I can to fix it, for example delete apps I don't use, pass all media to the microSD card, etc, but it is not enough. The 64 MB on the device is just ridiculously small for now, day & age. RIM did nothing about it? I don't understand:

    (1) why the Blackberry decided to remove SO my mail when it is out of memory. Why can't he just delete say 10% of it at the same time?

    2) why Blackberry cannot use my microSD stick (I have a 1 GB additional there!) to organize the email & apps? I mean, I'm not taking scads of photos & storing hordes of songs! I am a user of the company, and I want to store tons of old emails in order to search and reference them when I am not at my computer!

    What are the plans of the RIM to fix this? I'm pretty fed up with it. It's a horrible design flaw being so much additional memory wasted (my entire microSD card!)

    Is that what I do on myself, without intervention of the RIM and without constantly micro - manage my device memory?

    Hi and welcome to the forums!

    "The 64 MB on the device is just ridiculously small for now, day & age." RIM did nothing about it? "I do not understand:" you can upgrade phones, RIM is on improving:

    The "BOLD" also packs a new microprocessor Intel PXA270 624 MHz of horses for performance smoothly, compared to 312 MHz in previous models. There are also 128 MB memory flash and 1 GB of memory shipped with the option for expandable memory with a microSD/SDHC slot for a total of 16 GB.

    Your questions:

    (1) Blackberry lights in mode 'rescue' when extremely low memory. The emails, the call logs, texts, are considered "non-critical".

    files that can be deleted if the Blackberry can take in charge the important functions of phone calls, keep your calendar, contacts, etc..

    This isn't a "design flaw" is a well thought of preservation of the function of the device.

    (2) the basic concept of the Blackberry was flash memory, like all devices before the advent of high-end of the memory cards.

    (3) the link below is to maximize the memory of JCLARK. This set of procedures if followed will give you more available memory to use as possible.

    (4) Please remember that it is a Smartphone, not a laptop. You won't have to "micro-manage"your memory, but you don't have to maintain.

    a awareness of the unit limit and respect the parameters. Like any other device that you use.

    Follow the procedures described in the guide and judge the performance gained. If it is not adapted to your needs focus on upgrading to a "BOLD".

    http://www.BlackBerryForums.com/General-BlackBerry-discussion/112029-losing-call-logs-SMS-emails-opt...

    Thank you

    Don't forget to adjust your thread. Put the check mark in the green box containing your answer! Thank you

  • RN104 immediately 'out of 390 memory' error after 6.2.2 - > 6.2.5-> 6.4.2 upgrade

    I decided to update my firmware for 2 years and more old 6.2.2 to a more recent and stable version. Later in the branch 6.4 seemed OK-> 9 months, so I thought that it is proven. I wasn't hurt, I narrowly missed all the problems that others have reported the...

    You know, in the work, that I am a responsible administrator, reading notes of any publication, all procedures, laboratory before trying in production tests. But home - well, I'm just a home user better-class. I read the release notes for known issues - no such section in NETGEAR. So I tried forums, not much, so I went ahead. Come on, Netgear! How can you expect users domestic to be able to dig into your KB and/or the forums for hours to learn everything they can or not needed for a successful update? I dig now, because this time has priority! But before, I had homework of my children to help with etc. I don't have another system at home to do the tests on...

    Now my system with 5 + TB (4 x 2 TB drives) of data goes into error __out_of_memory_390 on 1 or 2 minutes after I start. All posts here reiterate one and the only solution:

    1 save the config and all data (this should be possible even in my situation using 'Volume read-only' option in the Boot menu-> How to check to http://kb.netgear.com/app/answers/detail/a_id/22891/~/how-do-i-access-the-boot-menu-on-my-readynas-1...).

    2 perform a reset.

    3 configure the NAS from scratch or restore the configuration.

    4. restore your data (can be difficult if you use start files - all users individual need to restore their data themselves as far as I understand it - not even the administrator will be able to restore the permissions correctly - weird for me, but it is also not confirmed).

    I don't like this kind of solutions, but enough complaining... I have only used the SIN as a NFS storage device and wasn't using snapshots on the NFS share, and was not using any other feature. Nevertheless, I believe that my problem can be caused by too many clichés. I think that this _must_be_ article related to all the release notes and upgrade the firmware procedures:

    http://KB.NETGEAR.com/app/answers/detail/A_ID/30033

    So far, I tried "Reinstall OS" in the menu of boot without success. This morning, I put in a working spare 500 GB and put disc to update firmware for 6.5.0. The machine works well, but my goal is to put in my 4 drives (he'll upgrade the firmware of drives for what is in flash on the NAS, i.e. 6.5.0) tonight in the hope that: -.

    -l' error not at all, or

    -at least I'll have enough time to remove a few shots before they appear.

    If this isn't the case, I'll try to upgrade to 6.5.1 using the scratch disk and try again. If no success, I have to take the system to the laboratory work to safeguard, reset and restore. I don't have any other place where I can find 6 TB of space...

    I will let you know my results.

    Now, I wanted to pass my message to: -.

    -Community = hourly defrag/scrub/balance of your berries + disable and remove snapshots if you don't need them + do not trust the seller this update of the firmware is painless and safe.

    -Netgear = no home user is interested by the products for which you have 10 + years of experience to set up and maintain and 1 day of research work of documentation to just update of firmware and backup data off it just in case.

    I'm not out of the woods yet, but I've made considerable progress.

    I was able to start mode 'volume read-only', which was reassuring. At least I'd be able to save data...

    So, I tried to find what is really happening in the system. So I connected via SSH and looked at the use of the system. As soon as the volume of data has been mounted, btrfs-cleaner process appeared. He attached the CPU at 100%, which would not be a problem in itself. But it also consumes more and more memory and when the system began to Exchange, he on the ground to stop. I did another test - started in 'volume read-only' mode, logged as root and run "mount-o remount, rw/data". The result is the same--btrfs-cleaner ate all memory, swapping started, the system stopped. Still, the finger is pointed on either (too many processes etc) snapshots, or quotas (newly introduced function).

    After another "volume read-only' mode initialize-go to top, I ran this:

    Mount o remount, rw/data; Btrfs quota disable/data

    and the system remained OK, no btrfs-cleaner, nothing. So I put all other btrfs file systems (get the list with ' mount | grep btrfs'). In my case:
    -the list of volumes of btrfs: -.

    md127/dev/on/data type btrfs (rw, noatime, nodiratime, nodatasum, nospace_cache, subvolid = 5, subvol = /)
    / dev/md127 on /apps type btrfs (rw, noatime, nodiratime, nodatasum, nospace_cache, subvolid = 257, subvol = / .apps)
    / dev/md127 market/House type btrfs (rw, noatime, nodiratime, nodatasum, nospace_cache, subvolid = 256, subvol = / home)
    / dev/md127 on/var/ftp/home type btrfs (rw, noatime, nodiratime, nodatasum, nospace_cache, subvolid = 256, subvol = / home)
    / dev/md127 on/run/nfs4/data/Shared type btrfs (rw, noatime, nodiratime, nodatasum, nospace_cache, subvolid = 275, subvol = / Shared)
    / dev/md127 on/run/nfs4/home type btrfs (rw, noatime, nodiratime, nodatasum, nospace_cache, subvolid = 256, subvol = / home)

    -orders up and disable quotas: -.

    Mount o option remount, rw/home; Btrfs quota disable/Home
    Mount o remount, rw /apps; Btrfs quota disable /apps
    Mount o option remount, rw/var/ftp/home; Btrfs quota disable/var/ftp/home
    Mount o option remount, rw, run, nfs4, host; Btrfs quota disable/run/nfs4/home
    Mount o remount, rw/run/nfs4/data/Shared; Btrfs quota disable run/nfs4/data/Shared

    Note that run/nfs4/data/Shared is my NFS share and you will not have it for sure. Your list may be very different.

    Still no btrfs-cleaner, the system still running OK. So I removed all the snapshots (note: I do not use them at all, your implementation may be different, but you may need to do too much in to restore the system).
    How to remove snapshots - well, first you must have a list of the configs - they are in fact numbers and their number corresponds with the County of volume btrfs: -.

    LS/etc/snapper/configs

    You can also find what config is for how much (smilies are actually two points and the capital S);

    root@Kostka:~# grep VOLUME/etc/snapper/configs / *.
    0UBVOLUME = "/ data/backup".
    1UBVOLUME = "/ data/Documents.
    2UBVOLUME = "/ data / music»
    3UBVOLUME = "images / data / '.
    4UBVOLUME = "/ data / Shared.
    5UBVOLUME = "/ data/videos»

    Then run for each configuration:

    list

    It will show you something like:

    Type   | #   | Pre # | Date of                             | The user | Cleaning | Description | UserData
    -------+-----+-------+----------------------------------+------+---------+-------------+----------------------
    only | 0 | | | root | | current |
    only | 13 | | Thursday, March 31, 2016 12 h 00:41 CEST | root | | | snapshot = c_1459375241
    only | 43 | | Saturday, April 30, 2016 12:00:25 AM CEST | root | | | snapshot = c_1461967225

    only | 74. | Tuesday, May 31, 2016 12:00:49 CEST | root | | | snapshot = c_1464645648
    only | 104. | Thursday, June 30, 2016 12:00:25 AM CEST | root | | | snapshot = c_1467237624
    only | 134. | Saturday, July 30, 2016 12 h 00:20 CEST | root | | | snapshot = c_1469829619
    only | 135. | Sunday, July 31, 2016 12:00:51 CEST | root | | | snapshot = c_1469916051
    only | 141. | Saturday, August 6, 2016 12 h 00:58 CEST | root | | | snapshot = c_1470434458
    only | 148. | Saturday, August 13, 2016 12 h 00:05 CEST | root | | | snapshot = c_1471039205
    only | 155. | Saturday, August 20, 2016 12:00:25 AM CEST | root | | | snapshot = c_1471644025
    only | 158. | Tuesday, August 23, 2016 12 h 00:08 CEST | root | | | snapshot = c_1471903208
    ..
    cut = there are daily snapshots
    ..
    only | 181. | Thu 15 Sep 2016 12 h 00:21 CEST | root | | | snapshot = c_1473890421

    And now, you clean all of them, but the current. The command is "snapper - c remove 1 -", in my case, for example "remove snapper - c 0 1-181'." They were all size zero, so it took less than a second.

    I then rebooted in normal mode. The current state of the system is:-
    -Snapshots deleted and all the decision-making of snapshots off.
    -Disabled quota. It is for sure not supported by Netgear. Some things may be broken. Firmware update may enable them or fail because of them being disabled. Etc.
    -Now I'm balancing, defragmentation and rub the volume. I have not found in what order it is best to do, KB #26941 Netgear's advice is to rub rarely, defrag occasionally and balance regularly. My volume 6 TB took 10.5 hours balancing, 4.5 hours to defragment and it took 13 hours to rub at 30%.

    Next steps: -.
    -Check the integrity of the data.
    -Activate the quotas and see if the system comes up normally.

  • Windows 8 update took as much memory or not?

    There are (like 4 days ago) from a few days I have 122 GB of free space on my laptop. When I closed the computer, the only option I had was "SHUT DOWN and UPDATED" and 'RESTART & UPDATE' so I chose stop & update... It took long hours updated... My installation was 13 of 17 and he did not move during these hours. So I decided to force shut down my computer.

    When I turned on my computer, I now only have 116 GB of free space... I thought that maybe the update ate as much memory. But a few minutes later, he went to 114 and 113 GB... I have not installed any other software or downloaded any file that would run up to 1 GB. I don't have.

    So today, yet have not download anything, I only 104 GB left! Can anyone help? Why I feel this kind of question. Thank you.

    In order to diagnose your problem, we need run Windows performance toolkit, the instructions that are in this wiki

    If you have any questions do not hesitate to ask

    Please run the trace when you encounter the problem
  • Limits of Disco e Memoria vSphere

    OLA.

    MEU ambiente possui as seguintes configuracoes:

    6 clubs 3 TB e 64 GB of memory RAM.

    Na versão 4.1 hypervisor nao estava reconhecendo discos 3TO acima. UM disco em 3 TB, reconheceu 700 GB.

    JA na versão 5.1 mourned memoria RAM 32 GB acima nao na versão gratuita.

    Por case alguem sabe me say is a versão 4.1 Update 3 or a versão 5.1 update 1 where o problema?

    Alguem por case that has um ambiente com discos acima 2 TB com o vSphere Hypervisor (Gratuito) was using 100% back discos?

    Muito Obrigado.

    Oi...

    Voce utlizar acima disco 2 TB so sendo RAW DEVICE.

    VMFS tem has ate 2 TB ( http://kb.vmware.com/selfservice/microsites/search.do?language=en_US&cmd=displayKC&externalId=1003565 ) limitacao

    O Quebec voce pode fazer e through try of da controladora do disco as voce tem no seria criar servidor no discos logicos com size 2 TB get use todo Espaço existente para menor no disco.

  • I have an IMAC of 2008 with 2 GB of memory plus 300 GB of storage. If I buy 2GB of memory I'll be able to download Sierra?

    I have an IMAC of 2008 with 2 GB of memory plus 300 GB of storage. If I buy 2GB of memory I'll be able to download Sierra?

    Mike,

    No, macOS Sierra is not compatible with your hardware.

    Here is an analytical compatibility.

  • iPhone SE sync - memory almost full

    When I sync my SE I see that my phone memory is almost full. Most of the memory is used by Documents and data. What is this and how can I reduce it?

    "Documents & data" so often in large part album art associated with music on your iPhone.

    Another way to measure the use of storage of your iPhone is on the iPhone: settings > general > storage & use iCloud > manage storage (in storage).  Remove some of the elements of y.

  • MacBook pro mail on El Capitan running slow? I have a lot of memory and storage.

    Slow mail. 9.3: if I remove large attachments in emails that will make e-mail faster turnaround? I have around 100 emails in email with attachments to file 15 MB image on average software.

    Thank you very much for your help!

    OS X El Capitan

    10.11.6 version

    MacBookPro 13 inch 2011

    Processor Intel Core i7 2.7GHz

    16GB 1333 MHz DDR3 memory

    Mackintosh of HD boot drive

    Intel HD Graphics 3000 512 MB graphics

    Mail Version 9.3 (3124)

    Try to run this program in your usual account, then copy and paste the result in a response. The program was created by Etresoft, a regular contributor.  Use please copy and paste the screenshots can be difficult to read. On the screen with the Options, please open Options and tick the boxes in the bottom 2 before the race. Click on the button "Report share" in the toolbar, select "Copy to Clipboard" and then paste into a response. This will show what is running on your computer. No personal information is shown.

    Etrecheck - Information System

  • Blue screen and bad RAM memory?

    My MBP 2011 early all just stopped working yesterday, it worked very well without any problem of performance for the last 5 years, and then suddenly a blue screen (of death) and it has problems starting.

    He will ring the Bell to start, display the bar loading and Apple, and then there will be a glitch on the big screen (horizontally) 1 inch above the Apple, after that, the fans speed up and all that I see a gray screen, not user interface.

    I zapped the PRAM/MSC and tried the unique memory sticks, I have no spare RAM on hand, but who will order soon.

    Tips to solve this problem?

    AHT says this - 65/4MEM/4000000000: 0x84f6f918

    Google says it is bad memory

    Here is the BSoD:

    I think you have a problem of memory, although if your MacBook Pro 15 or 17 inch, you should consider video issue as well now.

    http://www.Apple.com/support/MacBookPro-videoissues/

  • last possible system on Mac Mini 1.93 GHz Intel Core 2 GB memory

    last possible system on Mac Mini 1.93 GHz Intel Core 2 GB memory?

    My system works very well except for Safari and Firefox, which NOW have updated versions.  What is the solution? I use Snow Leopard and latest Firefox since it's 48.0.2 and Safari's 5.1.10 that I can no longer use to access certain web pages

    The official list of Mac compatible with macOS Sierra:

    What are the requirements for Sierra.

    Towards the end of 2009 or later

    • MacBook
    • iMac


    2010 or later

    • MacBook Air
    • MacBook Pro
    • Mini Mac
    • Mac Pro

    If you do not meet the above, but respect what follows, then you can upgrade to El Capitan.

    Upgrade to El Capitan

    You can pass the Lion El Capitan or directly from Snow Leopard. El Capitan can be downloaded for FREE from the Mac App Store.

    To upgrade to El Capitan, you must have Snow Leopard 10.6.8 or installed Lion. Download El Capitan from the App Store. Sign in with your Apple ID. El Capitan is free. The file is big enough, more than 5 GB, allow it some time to download. It would be preferable to use Ethernet because it is nearly four times faster than wireless.

    Mac that can be upgraded to OS X El Capitan

    1 iMac (mid-2007 or newer) - model identifier 7.1 or later

    2 MacBook (late 2008 or early 2009 or newer aluminium) - model identifier 5.1 or later

    3. MacBook Pro (Mid/Late 2007 or newer)- model identifier 3.1 or later version

    4 MacBook Air (late 2008 or newer)- model identifier 2.1 or later

    5 mac mini (early 2009 or newer)- model identifier 3.1 or later version

    6 mac Pro (Early 2008 or newer)- model identifier 3.1 or later version

    7 Xserve (early 2009) - model identifier 3.1 or later version

    To find the identifier of the model open system information in the Utilities folder. It is displayed in the Panel on the right.

    Are my applications?

    See table of application - RoaringApps compatibility

    Upgrade to Lion

    If your computer does not meet requirements to install the above, it can still meet the specifications to install Lion.

    You can buy Lion to the Apple store. The cost is $19.99 (as it was before) plus taxes.  It's a download. You will receive an email with a redemption code that you then use on the Mac App Store for download Lion. Save a copy of this installer to your download folder because Setup deletes itself at the end of the installation.

    Lion system requirements

    1 mac with an Intel Core 2 Duo, Core i3, Core i5, Core i7,

    or Xeon processor

    2. 2 GB of memory

    3 OS X 10.6.6 or later (10.6.8) recommended

    4. 7 GB of available space

    5. certain features require an Apple ID; conditions apply.

  • Why must the Finder 10.12 more physical memory

    Hello

    I use the preview mode icons in the Finder feature to pre-select one or more images for later use in documents. The pre-selection spans more than 30-40 records, each a few images from 80 to 120. At the beginning just after the start of system-Finder takes about MB, 45-47. Working through records about 20 this is increased to a muscular 1.78 GB. Which is not a problem at the moment because I have 20 GB of available, but I was wondering why the Finder is the hungry.  And also, this increase in the number of forever with the number of records, I'm working through?

    The only way I can "free" memory to baseline is to force quit viewfinder, but there must be a more elegant method.

    Anyone know this method? Thanks in advance.

    Hans

    Finder, as the system and other applications, will use unused memory in the file cache. It uses more memory, but it does not use what is available and who otherwise would be wasted. If something else needs memory, cache memory is reduced. There is no need to keep 'liberation' memory. The system will take care of him for you (that's why all apps free memory are unnecessary placebos that actually reduce performance).

  • "Your system is running out of Application memory"

    Hello

    Since last week I have been having a problem where my computer screen appears with a reading of the question 'your system has sold out of the memory of the application.' This happens around every 20-30 minutes to use my computer, where the issue is resolved by restarting my computer. However, this message appears when I have 1 or 2 applications open (including the permanent Finder application). At my computer without a doubt a lot of memory left and I installed only 5 additional applications: League of Legends, Microsoft Excel, Powerpoint, Word and Outlook. I used OS X El Capitan for the first half of the week and macOS Sierra for the second half, but the upgrade did not solve my problem.

    I run:

    MacBook Air (13 inch, mid 2013)

    1.3 GHz Intel Core i5 processor

    DDR3 4 GB 1600 MHz memory

    Start drive Macintosh HD

    Graphics Intel HD Graphics 5000 1536 MB

    Your system is running out of RAM, not disk space. 4 GB is the absolute minimum of RAM. Try to remove all unnecessary startup items (Preferences > users and groups > you > login items) with the key less (not simply uncheck the boxes - which hide just the app but it still works).

    You can also run activity monitor (Applications > utilities) to see what is using the memory.

  • What is reasonable memory for Firefox use?

    Title says it all-

    What is reasonable memory for Firefox use?

    The normal use, I am an average of 1.2 G or about memory (of 16 G total); is this normal? Don't not maxing out at all but I was wondering.

    How to define and measure the use of memory for Firefox? Activity monitor? I use Firefox to write this. In the activity monitor, I see Firefox to 347 MB and Firefox Web Content to 259 MB.

  • Purgeable memory

    I had just recently purgeable memory appear in my closet for my Macbook pro under OS Sierra 2015. What is this memory for and where it comes from?

    Purgeable disk memory is disk with files stored in it. The most frequent creator of them is "snapshot backups" created during your regular backup drive is not available.

    Purgeable means they will be deleted immediately if another Application requires you to file that isn't otherwise available space.

  • Start 2011 13 "Macbook Pro with overheating which may be responsible for problems of logical memory board or app... not addressed in repair under warranty for MBP 15 & 17

    My early 2011 MBP 13 "took 2 battery replacements and is suddenly showing app memory problems, stop suddenly, extremely slow performance... etc.  Note 15 and 17 "in early 2011 MBP are part of a free replacement/repair program with Apple after many years of problem reports and legal action.

    Is my 13 "also part of this clear problem or I am the GROUND?

    Are what program you referring?

    http://www.Apple.com/support/MacBookPro-videoissues/

Maybe you are looking for