Missing pallets of sharpness and noise reduction

Similar Questions

• default values for sharpness and noise in the develop Module

  Capture sharpening

  I get my head round sharpening and agree there are three distinct phases: Capture, creative and output sharpening sharpening sharpening

  Regarding the Capture sharpening, I noticed that when I import a CR2 file in Lightroom 3.6 there is a pre-set Adobe in the develop Module. Is this a form of Capture sharpening default?

  Sharpening

  Amount: 25

  RADIUS: 1.0

  Detail: 25

  Noise reduction

  Luminance: 0

  Color: 25

  Detail: 50

  Thanks, Jeff

  I got the hang of this now. The parameters are the same in ACR and LR - as I might expect that I always use the same camera - but they never vary independently of any setting ISO I can used well

  Bill

• Frequency of an analogue signal measurement and noise reduction

  Hello everyone.

  I'm reading a flow rate sensor that generates output signal square whose frequency has a linear relationship with the flow rate and varies from 37 to 550 Hz. My hardware does not support playback of the frequency, so I have to calculate. What I ended up doing was reading signal every 1 millisecond (1000 Hz), taking two samples spread and store the value of the signal and the time during which it was read. Every 400 milliseconds, I loop over the data and know how many cycles have taken place and the time between the first and the last cycle, divide the number of cycles at this time here.

  Here's a graph of the signal.

  

  I never use software loops timed then performing operations of data acquisition as a general rule. He's many trendy on negative issues. And as you mentioned that you cannot run a timed loop faster than 1 kHz. You should go to the Help menu in the toolbar, then select search examples. Then you look up "continuous acq. It is best to leave all the details of the calendar to the data acquisition unit and just retrieve data from the buffer of data acquisition, then it is needed. I have your case I would recommend a sample equal to 6 kHz freq. That's more than 10 times your highest frequency. You can always update your data at intervals to 400msec. Your signal also looks good. I can't have a lot of noise in your signal. If my guess is that your software is not optimal. You should not get 120 Hz, so there is no flow. If you post we can take a look.

• X 201 micro - quality and noise reduction

  Hello. I was wondering if someone managed to make a reasonable use of microphones on the X 201 tablet. I don't know if I configure them or if they are simply poor quality, but the microphones seem to be horrible. When I turn off noise cancelling and echo cancellation, there is a humming sound important and crackled in the background. When I turn on the noise cancelling, it is totally impossible for the microphones to be used to record or transmit any intelligible voice, even if I yell.

  In short, the pickups are almost useless for Skype and similar and of course completely useless for any sort of speech recognition applications.

  Someone had a bit of luck in tweaking perhaps some special configuration settings that I'm not aware of? However, if the microphones are just fundamentally wrong, someone at - it recommendations for an extra helmet (preferably without wireless/bluetooth) microphone?

  Hey dm09,.

  try to uninstall the audio drivers for your device.

  Let windows install its generic drivers and test again.

  It made a difference?

  Note that the version of the sound driver for the X 201 is at 3.66.147.0/4.95.48.50. If yours is not to this version update for this.

  at the same time, do a full update of the system of your device.

• Noise reduction, clarity and sharpness of Vs masking

  Maybe I used too much clarity for the birds and noise reduction. Some recommend on dpReview, no noise reduction and now I tend to believe them. Recently, I tried using little to no noise reduction, little or no clarity, a lot of sharpness and about 40% of masking. This gives the details of good bird feather, and anything with less detail has little better bokeh and noise. In areas of low detail it seems to me that the masking reduced the noise caused by the sharpening, but it has less effect on the noise increased clarity. Is this true? If this is the case, birds, photography is better clarity used sparingly and selectively, as on the head?

  Another reason for all of this, is that once I read even a little masking degrades the sharpness but now I doubt that. Maybe LR which has improved over the years.

  Thank you

  Doug

  Reducing noise from luminance indeed (and the extended color noise reduction) tends to erase fine feather detail.

  I recommend:

  * lowered the noise reduction and if you are not using it, how the cursor nr.detail up crank - this will help maintain fine feather detail and is superior to sharpen detail to maintain details otherwise lost pen due to the reduction of noise.

  * a lowered sharpening in detail, to reduce noise and reduce the "need" to reduce the noise.

  * and sharpen masking to taste...

  Also note: exactly 50 masks all global sharpening sharpening room and can therefore be used in conjunction with noise reduction to smooth bokeh areas.

  And of course you can add sharpening or clarity locally too.

  I know that I have not responded to your question perfectly as asked, but I don't know what to say, then...

  Have fun

  Rob

• noise reduction shows do not develop the module

  I noticed today that when I noise reduction in the develop module, the changes are not be represented on the image, I work with, except in the top left hand corner... too small for me to see clearly.  But when I go to the library module, the changes actually took place.  If anyone has experienced this?  I need a fix because it's a bad guessing game my slider without seeing results until I have the switch modules.  Have not had this problem before. A lot of my work turns out too smooth!  I appreciate any help I can get with that.

  beeeeezzz2 wrote:

  Thank you very much, Lee.  So, there is no problem with the software?  For clarity, in this case then, Lightroom is holding useless NR, but this change, discuss that with me visually?  Do you know if I can mount it too?

  No dysfunction, no override.  There has been a lot of discussion on this and it is possible in a future version that will add a preference or other corrective action can be taken, but for the moment, just use library or more large image sizes.  In reality, it is always better to judge sharpening and noise reduction to 1:1.

• sharpening and noise in point 6.3 of ACR... advice please

  Hello

  Where can I find good tutorial (or other advice) stuff on the sharpness and noise in point 6.3 of ACR.

  My camera is a Panasonic DMC - FZ8.

  Adjustments like color / black / contrast I can 'see' on my screen (I am convinced so far).

  But the noise and sharpening... "It is a different kettle of fish"... I have problems with it... complex... (my std JPG is better than RAW - JPG).

  Basic rules are usually made to be broken.  They could provide a good starting strategy in many cases.

  The thread I did reference is: http://forums.adobe.com/thread/780678

  I reread and it's not that much more information on it.

  Keep in mind, there is nothing fundamentally wrong with an image file further.  If you are short of space, new drives are incredibly cheap these days.

  A good rule of thumb (!) is not save, then open, then resave JPEG files.  You can do it once or twice in a pinch, but the compression artifacts will be piling up, just like JPEG lossy compression.

  If a PSD file is growing like save for save, this may be because you're doing something for the image to the cause--for example, create new layers, or sharpening it and increasing the amount of detail apparent in the compression process must deal with.

  -Christmas

• Cc of Lightroom export no noise reduction and sharpening changes

  I have recently updated to Lightroom from 5.7 to CC, but can not get the noise reduction and sharpening of changes to export. The files are imported from a D7200 of Nikon NEF files. After you change the image, I can see the changes in library modules and put at the point, but not in the exported jpg file. Any help is greatly appreciated.

  Thanks for posting the requested screen captures and ISO setting. You see more noise in the exported JPEG image file in the library and develop modules because you have output applied sharpening (sharpen: high screen). This is the case additional sharpening not present in the library modules and develop. ERGO: They will be different. Output sharpening should be used when reducing the size of the image with "Resize to Fit" checked. Each time an image is resized it loses the edge sharpness and output sharpening restores the details of contours in the small size file.

  Follow the instructions in deepakgahlot provided in response #1 and ensure that the export module output sharpening > sharpening for: is not checked. If you still have questions please download one of the files on Dropbox image or other file sharing site and post the sharing link.

• When I edit a .wav file (noise reduction to remove the background hiss) and save them, the changes are not saved.

  I just installed hearing and have edited a few audio voiceover to remove the background hiss.  When I save the changes and reopen the file, the hiss is back.  The changes are not saved.  Why is this happening?  How to record the sound of the effects of reduction in my .wav file?

  [Ask in the correct forum allows... Left generic Cloud/Setup forum for forum specific program... MOD]

  shionak wrote:

  I capture the background hissing noise footprint > click apply > click on select, then click on apply again.

  These steps are not quite correct. You have two choices; either highlight a part of the background noise and use SHIFT + P, which captures your selection as a basis for NR or, open the Panel NR and use "Capture noise Print" from there, after making a selection first. After doing this, click on "select an entire file. What you definitely have to do is to use 'apply' at this point, and when use you it, just use it once.

  When you capture using printed, the Preview 'play' button inside the plugin to check the settings and then stop it. When you are satisfied of what he done, then click on 'Apply' - but once. This will apply for all of your noise reduction. As long as you do not use "undo" at any time, the version Number will be be recorded on the original, or if you use "save under", then the original will be left alone, and a new noise-reduced version will be saved.

• Asks the plugin noise reduction effect-made clip jerky and slow down after application?

  I apply an effect - the neat video Plugin to reduce noise. for some reason when I apply the effect, playback of the clip is really slow and jerky. Why is this?

  Hi Dragonsfire,

  I'm looking at the rendering time and it's extremely slow, like the clip is 30 secs long 2mins but render time estimate is like 3 hours! My laptop is not the fastest, but it is not no more ancient. Any suggestions on the reduction to make time-no understood them with a much more powerful computer!

  You have met one of the intensive more rendered effects on the stage of post-production. Sorry if you think that something goes wrong. Likely, that's fine, except that it takes very long time to process images with that plugin.

  Here are some tips on the neat video forum:

  The real rendering for your clip speed should be around approximately 2 images per second. This value seems normal for a HD (1920 x 1080) image size and material to the average (you don't mention your hardware specifications). You can speed up a bit by disabling some of these filter options:

  • disable the very low freq, high quality options
  • some of the fixed noise reduction in some or all channels amounts (luminance / chrominance or Y/Cr/Cb) and/or ranges of frequency at 0%
  • reduction of the time filter RADIUS
  • disable the option of adaptive filtering

  These measures allow the filter a little faster, but at the expense of the quality of filtration reduced. Noise reduction is usually a compromise between quality and processing speed. When you need good quality, it makes sense to give some time to the process with the top of the settings page. When that is not necessary, you can use a less accurate and more rapid filtration.

  Thank you

  Kevin

• Issue of noise reduction

  Hi all

  I have a picture shot at 3200 ISO and have reduced the noise considerably in camera raw. Satisfied with the results here. However, when you open the it in PS CC, the noise is back as if I have nothing in ACR. PS noise reduction filter will not come even close to the results obtained in ACR.

  Am I missing something?

  Also tried to save it as .tif and .jpg same in ACR, but same result when opening these files in PS.

  Thank you

  In ACR, have you checked the NR to 100% zoom?   If this isn't the case, it is possible that noise is still there and some algorithm used by CAB to resample an image to the screen, is artificially noise suppression, which is not really gone, and PS shows the noise remains.

• The noise reduction works only on MAC Lightroom 5.4

  I knew that the noise reduction that I apply to my photos is visible in the area of software development. I'm going to the library he disappears and the same thing happen if I export the image in any format.

  I post a screenshot where you can see an example of image with the desired noise reduction applied (right) and the same pictures, as he shows in the field of the library (left). Switching between the two areas (library and develop) results as a toggle of noise reduction.

  Dropbox - example.tiff

  
  

  Is there a way to fix this bug?

  
  

  Thank you.
  

  View generally develop - Fit is more crisp than the library or export, when there was enough noise reduction added to an image to give the impression of sweetness, and people complain that sharpening is not applied; However, in this situation through extreme noise reduction settings, an artificial coarse replaced fine-grained noise that seems to manifest itself differently according to develop Fit, and the complaint is that the library has no NR applied.

  More in detail, there are two questions here, both to the user, LR:

  (1) a user-hope that the No 1:1 to the point zoom is specific about the detailed settings.  It is not the case.  Years, there has been a warning of exclamation point on the detail settings section that says see things only to 1:1.  If a user doesn't see or ignores this warning and then their expectation wrong, as in this situation.

  (2) the detail of Luminance Noise reduction slider has been increased from the default value of 50 up to 100.  This has the effect of converting the sound of grain in an angular course texture, which is easily visible in reduced size except in the view to develop was inaccurate.

  In the next-by-side to zoom 1:1, the left panel is according to the user settings with the Lum-NR-Detail slider to 100, while the right has the cursor Lum-NR-detail set at the default value of 50, with all other parameters of the user remains the same:

  

  I would summarize what happens not as a bug but a different response from the develop-adjustment incorrect attended a different coarseness of the noise which is caused by an extreme environment of the Lum-NR-detail slider.  Since there is no resizing and not sharpness in export settings, I don't think that 1/3 bug has nothing to do with anything.

  It would be nice for the original poster (OP) to describe exactly what is wrong, after knowing the view to develop it is accurate if not seen at the 1:1.

• Long exposure noise reduction can be stopped ICLE5000L

  So as above. It may be "truned".

  I'm taking my own dark images and using a PC to hide them.

  Having to wait an HOUR for the camera to take another hit after a 30 min exposure is just irritating down!

  It says on the technical specifications, it is available. Is not mandatory.

  This Sony support page says "noise reduction long exposure is not performed with the following functions."

  • Adv. continues
  • More about shutter priority.
  • Support: Cont.
  • Smart auto
  • Night to hand shot in scene selection
  • Anti-Motion Blur
  • Sweep Panorama

  I have not tried but in the hope that the above will work for you.

• Hearing (CC 2015.2) noise reduction does not

  IM on an Apple running 10.11.6 and hearing CC 2015.2
  recently, I have to obtain the reduction of noise at work at all without success. I work as usual by selecting an impression of noise, and then opening the noise reduction and I immediately get a massive pop. If I stop the preview and start it again I get the same thing. There is no preview adjustments either. any parameter there is no change in the preview. If I try and select noise only it isn't even a change.

  If I apply the settings there isn't even a change even with more stringent parameters.

  I have no idea what is going on here and I really want to use the tool.

  Thanks for any help. !

  Well I took a risk and just blew the whole directory to ~ / Library/Preferences/Adobe/Audition/9.0.
  Not sure what was bad or something has been altered after the last update, but this fixed the problem.

  Hope that this thread helps out someone else in the same place.

• Is there a prime CC effective noise reduction tool?

  To return in the first and enjoy it a lot, it of changed a lot since I modified it used in 2002/3 - anyway, is it a video first, available effective noise reduction tool not audio noise.

  Nope.

  Make your choice:

  Neat video - best digital video noise reduction

  Red giant | Denoiser II, easy video noise reduction

  FROM: Noise - RE: Vision Effects