Modulo 10G sfp + by powerconnect 7048

Similar Questions

• Problems of redundancy PowerConnect 7048

  Hello! I recently put in place a network I have a problem with and need someone to go through my configs of switch and tell me if they see something that I did wrong.

  The network consists of a blade M1000 - filled completely, Equalogic 2, 2 Powerconnect 7048 and 2 Powerconnect 8024-K (inside of the blade). I have everything configured for redundancy. Each server blade has 4 NIC, two are for iSCSI traffic and the other 2 are for virtual machine network traffic.

  The 7048 are stacked. I got everything is configured so I can unplug all four NICS (one at a time) on a blade, and the server will remain connected to storage and the network of the VM. I can also 2 (one at a time) 8024 switch K to shoot, and servers will be connected for the storage and the network of the VM. However, when I unplug one of the 7048 s 2, or the other, I lose the storage and access to the VM network, these all the network goes down. There is a lag configured for the uplink of the 7048 to a Meraki switch, so I should be able to always pass traffic, but the network is down.

  Attached are the configs of switch and a Visio diagram, I hope that someone can choose the problem immediately. My goal is a total redundancy, so when I lose a 7048 network remains standing. Thanks in advance!

  I try to activate the transfer non-stop on the battery and test it again. Nonstop forwarding allows transfer of battery units plan to continue to transmit packets while the control and management of aircraft restart after a power failure, hardware failure or the software on the management of battery unit.

  Console (config) #nsf

• Connection EQL 6110 X (10G SFP +) PowerConnect 6224 10 Uplink ports

  Dear friends,

  Need your help...

  Please let me know if I can connect EQL 6110 X (10 G SFP +) storage to ports 10 G SFP + PC 6224 for iSCSI to my servers on a local network connectivity that is 1 G.

  Correct, do not use the uplink ports for Gigabit Ethernet switch for 10GbE tables.    It can connect, but performance and stability will most likely suffer.   So has been the experience of other customers who have tried to do.

• Dell PowerConnect 7048 P reference stack Questions

  Hello

  I have two switches in L3 7048P I want the battery but I'm not sure how it works. The two switches have the same firmware.

  1 must. the two have the same configuration running on both to make it work?

  2. in addition, I created a VLAN (3) voice on the first switch with an IP address of 10.0.3.254. I use the same IP address on the second switch in the VLAN 3 addresses or assign another?

  Thank you!

  There is a guide especially for stacking switch 7048 on the Dell page networking white papers:

  en.Community.Dell.com/.../2580.Networking-guides.aspx

  Just search "Dell PowerConnect 7000 Series Switches stacking".  Page 16 will tell you how to add a new Member to the battery with minimum interruptions. Both can present the same firmware in order to stack.  So the answer to question 1 is no, the configurations do not need correspond to stack them.  Once stacked, both will look like a single switch, and you use only the IP address of the master swtich to the whole stack.  Therefore, treat the two switches as a single switch during Setup.  The guide provides more information on how it works.

  Hope this has been helpful.

  -Victor

• PowerConnect 7048 Port Mirroring

  Hello everyone,

  I'm trying to mirror two ports on my 7048 Powerconnect switch. One of them is a Trunk Port, and the other is just a port not marked. I don't see any incoming traffic on port of destination. Is it possible a bug in the Web management interface, which does not apply this correctly?

  Current firmware 4.2.2.3

  Thank you

  David

  We can try to activate the admin mode. I couldn't find the command to do this, but in the GUI there is a drop down under the switch > ports > traffic mirror > port mirroring. Allowing and see if the behavior changes.

  I am also curious to see of any change in behavior after an update of the firmware.

  Thank you

• Powerconnect 7048 lost password

  Hello!

  Regarding our network admin has left the company, I Don t have access to two 7048 powerconnect switches.
  Is there a possibility to reset the password without configuring loos?

  Could someone explain it how can I do this?

  Thank you
  Damien

  Sorry about that, we could try that.

  When the switch reboots, the following menu appears:

  1. start the working code.

  2 - Start-up boot menu.

  Select (1, 2):

  Select

  2

  to start the boot Menu.

  Appears in the Bootmenu.

  Options available

  1. start operational code

  2 - speed of change

  3. recover the events using XMODEM log

  4. load new operational code using XMODEM

  5. display operational code vital product data

  6 - diagnostic flash run

  7 - update boot code

  8 remove the backup image

  9 - reset the system

  10 - restore the default (remove the configuration files)

  11 activate the backup Image

  12 - password recovery procedure

  [Boot menu]

  Select option 12 and see if you can recover this password in this way.

• Aggregation of links between Powerconnect 7048 battery and battery S55 Force 10

  Hi all

  I'm trying to connect a battery 7048 with a stack of S55 (2 switches in each stack). I would use two ports (one on each switch) each battery to connect to each other. Can someone help me with the configuration of this please? I guess I'd go with LACP in this situation?

  If orders to fill what could be made, it would be much appreciated.

  Thank you, Carl.

  On the 7048, placing the ports in a SHIFT with LACP looks like this:

  Console (config) # interface gigabitethernet 0/1/2

  Console (config-if) active in mode channel-group 1 #.

  Console (config-if) output.

  Console (config) # interface gigabitethernet 0/2/2

  Console (config-if) active in mode channel-group 1 #.

  Console (config-if) output.

  Console (config) # interface port-channel 1

  Console (Config-if-PO1) #.

  And then configure the port channel but you need.

  On the S55, this tech tip article will guide you in the process of creating a GAP.

  http://bit.LY/1BO7tkS

  Let us know if you have any questions.

  See you soon

• 10G SFP + with DOM

  Hello

  Can someone tell where I can download the Cisco 10 G SFP + with DOM data sheet? I could find one, but it does not include details of digital optical monitoring (DOM). Unlike in 100Base, care data SFP SFP 1000Base, it includes information on the DOM.

  Help, please...

  Thank you

  Shawn

  First link of Sunil will work better for most people without any partner in the URL. for example,.

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/docs/interfaces_modules/transceiver_modules/compatibility/matrix/OL_8031.html

  The main 10GBASE SFP + form indicates these transceivers support digital optical followed in the main features section right at the top:

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/prod/collateral/modules/ps5455/data_sheet_c78-455693.html

  There are no more details, but I can testify that they have it and it works fine. I used it several times.

• 7048 routing/DHCP relay with 5548

  Hello

  I have a problem with the 5548 do not relay the query DHCP for PXE (SCCM), 5548 is connected to 7048 (trunk). We shop Cisco, this is the first time that I am using DELL. Any help is appreciated.

  --------7048--------
  
  !Current Configuration:!System Description "PowerConnect 7048, 4.2.2.3, VxWorks 6.6"!System Software Version 4.2.2.3!System Operational Mode "Normal"!configuregvrp enablevlan databasevlan 2,10-11,21,50-52,156vlan routing 1 1vlan routing 10 2vlan routing 21 3vlan routing 50 4vlan routing 51 5vlan routing 52 6vlan routing 156 7vlan routing 2 8vlan routing 11 9vlan association subnet 10.112.0.0 255.255.252.0 10vlan association subnet 10.112.4.0 255.255.255.0 11vlan association subnet 10.116.4.0 255.255.252.0 21slot 1/0 5    ! PowerConnect 7048slot 1/1 11   ! SFP+ Cardslot 1/2 9    ! CX4 Cardslot 2/0 6    ! PowerConnect 7048Pslot 2/1 11   ! SFP+ Cardslot 2/2 9    ! CX4 Cardstackmember 1 5    ! PCT7048member 2 6    ! PCT7048Pip routingip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.1.58ip route 10.0.0.0 255.0.0.0 192.168.1.58interface vlan 1exitinterface vlan 2ip address 192.168.1.57 255.255.255.252ip local-proxy-arpno ip redirectsexitinterface vlan 10ip address 10.112.0.1 255.255.252.0no ip redirectsexitinterface vlan 11ip address 10.112.4.1 255.255.255.0ip helper-address 10.112.1.50ip local-proxy-arpno ip redirectsexitinterface vlan 21ip address 10.116.4.1 255.255.252.0ip helper-address 10.112.1.50ip helper-address 10.112.1.51exitinterface Te1/1/2description 'F2_NTR_4'gvrp enablespanning-tree portfastswitchport mode trunkdot1x port-control force-authorizedexit
  
  ------5548------
  
  vlan databasevlan 10-11,21exit
  
  gvrp enable
  
  ip dhcp relay enable
  
  stack master unit 1!interface vlan 1 ip address dhcp!interface vlan 10 ip address 10.112.0.4 255.255.252.0 ip dhcp relay enable ip proxy-arp
  
  interface gigabitethernet1/0/18 spanning-tree portfast switchport access vlan 21
  
  ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 10.112.0.1
  
  interface tengigabitethernet1/0/1 description F2_NTM gvrp enable spanning-tree portfast auto switchport mode trunkSW version 4.1.0.1 (date  05-Apr-2012 time  15:03:04)
  
  Gigabit Ethernet Ports=============================no shutdownspeed 1000duplex fullnegotiationflow-control onmdix autono back-pressurespanning-treespanning-tree mode RSTP
  
  qos basicqos trust coseee enable
  

  SCCM PXE server is fine, tested on Cisco gear.
  

  It's weird, PXE starts working when I hard code the fiber connecting switches to full-duplex, even if they show the full duplex in automatic. Thanks for your help.

• can you connect the SFP - 10 G - SR low-support to SFP 1000BASE-SX?

  Hello world:

  today I use the SFP + 'SFP - 10 G - SR' in Cisco Catalyst 2960 S-48TD-L connect to the SFP 1000BASE-SX to 6509 WS - X 6724-SFP module.

  the port setting is master, but they do not work, even the light don't flush. Then, I also use the SFP 1000BASE-SX to replace SFP + SFP - 10 G - SR in

  2960 S-48TD-L, then they cany working.

  I look to the top of the cisco data sheet, there is no roadmap to satament database 10G sfp + can't low support 1 G sfp. So, I want to confirm the problem.

  Otherwise, the 10 FPS + can only use for 10G SFP +; can't go down the suport 1 G SFP.

  This means: If you want to use the 10 G SFP + the other old device also need to replace.

  Thank you ~ for your help!

  Hi Marvin,.

  I found this conversation today, because I'm looking for an answer on a question similar to the question that Jerry asked, at the opening of this discussion.

  So my problem is this. In a certain place, I need two 10 GB and a connection of 1 GB on an optical cable. To cut costs, I tried with WS-C2960X-48FPD-L, but because it contains only two ports of SFP +, I tried with two WS-C2960X-24PD-L which will be connected with the battery modules.

  Then, having two WS-C2960X-24PD-L, I have 2 x 2 ports SFP + 1 GB. There are two open questions:

  1. can I put 1 GB transmitter SFP module SFP + port (that I have a connection of 1 GB at remote site)?

  2. can I use two switches to 24 ports mentioned 2960, in a way that I use one of them for the two connections of 10 GB (using ports SFP + 10 GB connection) and the second member of the battery so that we (2 available) port SFP + is used to 1 GB SFP connection (using the SFP port + as mentioned in question 1)?

  I'm not sure if your previous statement covers my questions, because it is not clear if the 1 GB SFP transceiver can be inserted in the port SFP + WS - C2960X - 24PD - L (or any other a port SFP switch +).

• FX2 aggregator IO server down ports

  Hi all

  I'm new to Dell Community. We have just our chassis FX2. The question is this: -.

  We have two FN410s IOA in the chassis.

  We plugged on both IOA port 11 & 12 with 10G SFP +. The 128 LAG is in place, but we see that not all internal ports are on the rise.

  Ports 1,3,5,7 are 10G high speed & considered, but 2,4,6,8 are declining. Can you advise if this is the expected behavior

  Thank you & best regards

  Koné

  Thanks for your response

  Concerning

  kaulcd

• Spanning tree question

  I have a stack of 4 switches PowerConnect 7048 core. There are unacceptable delays on the network so I'm cleaning configurations and verification spanning tree as these have been set up by he previous admin. The four active links of 10 GB, the spanning tree different reports States:

  two are

  Te3/2/1 port active
  Status: Disabled role: disabled
  Identification of the port: 128.167 shipping: 0
  Fast port: no Protection from root: No.
  Designated the bridge priority: 4096 address: 5C26.0AAA.1EA6
  Identification of the designated port: 0.0 cost of access road designated: 0
  Root regional CSE: 80:00:5 C: 26:0 A: AA:1E:A6 CST Port cost: 0
  Root Guard..................................... FAKE
  Loop Guard..................................... FAKE
  TCN Guard...................................... FAKE
  Portfast auto... TRUE

  and two are

  Te2/2/2 port enabled
  State: Forwarding role: designated
  Identification of the port: 128.112 shipping: 2000
  Fast port: no Protection from root: No.
  Designated the bridge priority: 4096 address: 5C26.0AAA.1EA6
  Identification of the designated port: 128.112 cost of access road designated: 0
  Root regional CSE: 10:00:5: 26:0 A: AA:1E:A6 CST Port cost: 0
  Root Guard..................................... FAKE
  Loop Guard..................................... FAKE
  TCN Guard...................................... FAKE
  Portfast auto... TRUE

  . I think the first one indicates a problem and all must be reported as the redirection and designated. Is that correct and if so, how can this be done?

  Thank you

  Hello

  Does not serve a disabled state. If you do not disable spanning tree, it should allow. http://downloads.Dell.com/manuals/all-products/esuprt_ser_stor_net/esuprt_networking/esuprt_net_fxd_prt_swtchs/PowerConnect-7024_Reference%20Guide_en-us.PDF page 745

• Error STATSMGR - failure of the collectorGet function

  I started getting errors STATSMGR the log files excluding anyone on the core of PowerConnect 7048 of filling pile. The current firmware is 4.1.0.6 and I hesitate to upgrade the firmware after that an update of the firmware on a sharp N2048s corrupt their configuration. These manage the network and any failure would be catastrophic. Any other suggestions for clearing that issue of upgrading the firmware?

  <190>21 Jul 06:22:02 172.16.2.20 - 1 STATSMGR [237994160]: collector.c (1066) 75143% failed in function collectorGet

  Thank you!

  Sandi

  I know that you don't want to hear about the firmware, but the update of the firmware is specifically stated that this warning message is resolved in 4.2.0.4 on-site.

  http://Dell.to/1LrjXZO

  "Repeated messages in the switch connects <190>APR 28 19:39:22 10.1.208.10 - 1 STATSMGR [239558880]:

  collector.c (1066) 3445% deficiency in the function collectorGet. Resolution: SNMP walk / in contact with counters

  for CPU / vlan routing ports not supported by the platform is no longer log a warning message. «Affected platforms: 4.2 all supported platforms»

  Do you have any monitoring software on the network that could be polling the switch of these counters? You see that any performance hits on the battery? Being just a warning, I don't think that this will affect performance.

  A solution would be to change the severity of logging to not include warnings.

  # error logging in buffered memory

  the disadvantage of this would be that you wouldn't see an another warning message.

• LLDP and SNMP

  I have a 81xxF of powerconnect, 7048 switch and 5548 switches bouquets and I would get topology

  LLDP and SNMP

  should the OID I use?

  Eric,

  Here's the OID assignments for all Dell Networking switches.

  The OID industry:. 1.3.6.1.4.1

  Manufacturer OID: Reference Dell = 674

  LOB OID: Networks Dell = 10895

  Example =. 1.3.6.1.4.1.674.10895.1000 is a PowerConnect 5212 switch

  System for all products Dell Netwoking object IDS:

  5212 - 10895.1000

  5224 - 10895.4

  6024/F 10895.3000

  3324 - 10895.3002

  3348 - 10895.3003

  5324 - 10895.3004

  3424 - 10895.3006

  3448 - 10895.3007

  3424 P - 10895.3008

  3448 P - 10895.3009

  6224-10895.3010

  6248 10895.3011

  6224P 10895.3012

  6248P 10895.3013

  10895.3014 6224F

  M6220 = 10895.3015

  3524 = 10895.3016

  3548 = 10895.3017

  3524 P = 10895.3018

  3548 P = 10895.3019

  5424 10895.3020

  5448 10895.3021

  M8024 = 10895.3022

  8024 = 10895.3023

  8024F = 10895.3024

  M6348 = 10895.3025

  2808 10895.3026

  2816 10895.3027

  2824 10895.3028

  2848 10895.3029

  5524 = 10895.3030

  5548 = 10895.3031

  5524 P = 10895.3032

  5548 P = 10895.3033

  7024 = 10895.3034

  7048 = 10895.3035

  7024 P = 10895.3036

  7048 P = 10895.3037

  7024F = 10895.3038

  7048T = 10895.3039

  7048T - RA = 10895.3040

  M8024-k = 10895.3041

  N4032 = 10895.3042

  8132 = 10895.3042

  N4032F = 10895.3044

  8132F = 10895.3044

  N4064 = 10895.3045

  8164 = 10895.3045

  N4064F = 10895.3046

  8164F = 10895.3046

  N2024 = 10895.3053

  N2048 = 10895.3054

  N2024P = 10895.3055

  N2048P = 10895.3056

  N3024 = 10895.3057

  N3048 = 10895.3058

  N3024P = 10895.3059

  N3048P = 10895.3060

  N3024F = 10895.3061

  Dell Wireless devices:

  Controller W-650 = 10895.5001

  W-651 controller = 10895.5002

  Controller W-3200 = 10895.5003

  Controller W-3400 = 10895.5004

  Controller W-3600 = 10895.5005

  W-AP92 = 10895.5006 access point

  W-AP93 = 10895.5007 access point

  W-AP105 = 10895.5008 access point

  W-AP124 = 10895.5009 access point

  W-AP125 = 10895.5010 access point

  W-RAP5 = 10895.5011 access point

  W-RAP5WN = 10895.5012 access point

  W-RAP2 = 10895.5013 access point

  Controller W-620 = 10895.5014

  Hope this helps,

  B

• OpenManage Network Manager does not connect to

  I use the 5.1 openmanage Network Manager to manage the switches PowerConnect 7048.

  I am able to manage/monitor switches using SNMP without problems.

  However when I use telnet/ssh it keeps throwing errors saying "1 has failed to authenticate. Please click here for a list of devices that have failed. "trying to manage these devices by default".

  However the document says what needs to be written to the field ID to enable.

  I got it going!

  There was a problem with ssh on my switch. When activated it works now