My backup on a NAS system in a separate Ethernet environment takes about 30 hours for 222GB

Hello

someone has an idea how spee the backup process. Most of the time the transfer charge is not in MB/s but kb/s,

The NAS system is able to transfer 50 MB/s via an ethernet port matched.

But time machine is a pain. Anyone has a better solution

It is normal for a network backup. If you can make the first backup with a connection dirdct the incremental backups over the network so should not really be a problem

Tags: Mac OS & System Software

Similar Questions

  • Backup process takes about 17 hours, which includes the audit of 18 GB of data

    I backed up my system Windows XP Home edition on an external hard drive with the NTBackup utility system.  This process takes about 17 hours, which includes the audit of 18 GB of data.  Is there a problem with backup on my system causing this slow time of execution?

    Now, I created a disk image of my system using the NTBackup utility of the system from the installation disc, and also, it takes about 17 hours.  There may be some kind of hardware problem.

    My computer has installed in USB1 and translates into a slow backup.

    NTBackup is one of the worst possible for the backup options (as you can see from your experience). I can recommend a far superior alternative. But first, you must let us know what your goal is:

    1. regularly back up data ONLY (for example Word documents, photos, mp3s, etc.)?
    or
    2. make incremental copies perfect bootable on your system, including all service packs, updates, installed programs, etc. (and possibly your data as well)?
  • Poor ESXi 4 NFS Datastore Performance with various NAS systems

    Hello!

    In testing, I found that I get between a half and a quarter of the e/s inside a guest performance when ESXi 4 systems connect to the using NFS data store if the clients connect to the exact same NFS share.  However, I don't see this effect if the data store using iSCSI or local storage.  This has been reproduced with different systems running ESXi 4 and NAS systems.

    My test is very simple.  I created naked CentOS 5.4 minimum installation (completely updated 07/04/2010) with VMware Tools loaded and the creation time of a file of 256 MB using jj.  I create the file on the root (a VMDK stored in different data warehouses) partition or a directory of the NAS mounted via NFS, directly in the comments

    My crucial test configuration consists of a single test PC (Intel 3.0 GHz Core 2 Duo E8400 CPU with a single Intel 82567LM-3 Gigabit NC and 4 GB RAM) running ESXi 4 connected to a printer HP Procurve 1810 - 24 G, which is connected to a VIA EPIA M700 NAS system running OpenFiler 2.3 with two 1.5 to 7200 tr / MIN SATA disks configured in front of software RAID 1 and dual Gigabit Ethernet NIC.  However, I have reproduced it with different ESXi PC and NAS systems.

    This is a release of one of the tests.  In this case, the VMDK is a store of data stored on the NAS via NFS:

    -


    root@iridium /sync #; Sync; Sync; time {dd if = / dev/zero of = bs = 1 M count = test.txt 256 sync; sync; sync ;}}
    2560 records in
    256
    0 records out
    268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 0,524939 seconds, 511 MB/s
    Real 0m38.660s
    user 0m0.000s
    sys 0m0.566s
    root@iridium /# mount/mnt 172.28.19.16:/mnt/InternalRAID1/shares/VirtualMachines
    root@iridium /# cd/mnt
    synchronization of the # mnt root@iridium; Sync; Sync; time {dd if = / dev/zero of = bs = 1 M count = test.txt 256 sync; sync; sync ;}}
    2560 records in
    256
    0 records out
    268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 8,69747 seconds, 30.9 MB/s
    Real 0m9.060s
    user 0m0.001s
    sys 0m0.659s
    mnt root@iridium#.

    -


    The first dd is a VMDK stored in a connected via NFS data store.  The dd ends almost immediately, but the synchronization takes nearly 40 seconds!  It's less than 7 MB per second transfer rate: very slow.  Then I get the exact same NFS share that ESXi is used to store data directly in the comments and repeat the DD.  As you can see, the SD is longer and the synchronization takes no real time (as befits a NFS share with active sync), and the whole process takes less than 10 seconds: this is four times faster!

    I don't see these results on data warehouses mounted via NFS.  For example, here is a test on the guest even running from a mounted via iSCSI data store (using the exact same SIN):

    -


    root@iridium /sync #; Sync; Sync; time {dd if = / dev/zero of = bs = 1 M count = test.txt 256 sync; sync; sync ;}}
    2560 records in
    256
    0 records out
    268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 1,6913 seconds, 159 MB/s
    Real 0m7.745s
    user 0m0.000s
    sys 0m1.043s


    root@iridium /# mount/mnt 172.28.19.16:/mnt/InternalRAID1/shares/VirtualMachines
    root@iridium /# cd/mnt
    synchronization of the # mnt root@iridium; Sync; Sync; time {dd if = / dev/zero of = bs = 1 M count = test.txt 256 sync; sync; sync ;}}
    2560 records in
    256
    0 records out
    268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 8,66534 seconds, 31.0 MB/s
    Real 0m9.081s
    user 0m0.001s
    sys 0m0.794s
    mnt root@iridium#.

    -


    And the same comments linking internal SATA drive of the PC ESXi:

    -


    root@iridium /sync #; Sync; Sync; time {dd if = / dev/zero of = bs = 1 M count = test.txt 256 sync; sync; sync ;}}
    2560 records in
    256
    0 records out
    268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 6,77451 seconds, 39.6 Mbps
    Real 0m7.631s
    user 0m0.002s
    sys 0m0.751s
    root@iridium /# mount/mnt 172.28.19.16:/mnt/InternalRAID1/shares/VirtualMachines
    root@iridium /# cd/mnt
    synchronization of the # mnt root@iridium; Sync; Sync; time {dd if = / dev/zero of = bs = 1 M count = test.txt 256 sync; sync; sync ;}}
    2560 records in
    256
    0 records out
    268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 8,90374 seconds, 30.1 MB/s
    Real 0m9.208s
    user 0m0.001s
    sys 0m0.329s
    mnt root@iridium#.

    -


    As you can see, the performance of NFS direct comments for each of the three are very consistent.  ISCSI and the performance of the store local data disk are both a bit better than that - as I expect.  But the mounted via NFS data store gets only a fraction of the perfomance of the any of them.  Obviously, something is wrong.

    I was able to reproduce this effect with an Iomega Ix4 - 200 d as well.  The difference is not as dramatic, butalways important and consistent.  Here is a test of a guest of CentOS using a VMDK stored in a data store provided by an Ix4 - 200 d via NFS:-.

    root@palladium /sync #; Sync; Sync; time {dd if = / dev/zero of = bs = 1 M count = test.txt 256 sync; sync; sync ;}}
    2560 records in
    256
    0 records out
    268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 11,1253 seconds, 24.1 Mbps
    Real 0m18.350s
    user 0m0.006s
    sys 0m2.687s
    root@palladium /# mount/mnt 172.20.19.1:/nfs/VirtualMachines
    root@palladium /# cd/mnt
    synchronization of the # mnt root@Palladium; Sync; Sync; time {dd if = / dev/zero of = bs = 1 M count = test.txt 256 sync; sync; sync ;}}
    2560 records in
    256
    0 records out
    268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 9,91849 seconds, 27.1 MB/s
    Real 0m10.088s
    user 0m0.002s
    sys 0m2.147s root@palladium mnt-#.

    -


    Once more, the direct NFS mount gives very consistent results.  But using the diskette provided by ESXi on a mounted NFS datastore gives still worse results.  They are not as terrible as OpenFiler test results, but they are constantly between 60% and 100% longer.

    Why is this?  What I've read, NFS performace is supposed to be within a few percent of the iSCSI performance, and yet I see between 60% and 400% worse performance.  And this isn't a case of the SIN is not able to provide correct NFS performance.  When I connect to the NAS via NFS directly inside the guest, I see much better than when ESXi connects to the same NAS (the same proportion!) via NFS.

    The configuration of ESXi (network and network cards) is 100% stock.  There is no VLAN in place, etc., and ESXi system has only one

    Single Gigabit adapter.  It is certainly not optimal, but it doesn't seem to me to be able to explain why a virtualized guest is able to get a lot better performance NFS as ESXi itself to the same NAS.  After all, they both use the same exact suboptimal network configuration...

    Thank you very much for your help.  I would be grateful any idea or advice, you might be able to give me.

    Hi all

    It is very definitely a performance O_Sync problem. It is well known that NFS VMware shops still use O_Sync for writes little matter what share put for a default value. VMware uses a custom file locking system so you really can't compare it to a normal NFS share connection to a different NFS client.

    I have validated that the performance will be good if you have an SSD cache or storage target with enough reliable battery backup.

    http://blog.laspina.ca/ubiquitous/running-ZFS-over-NFS-as-a-VMware-store

    Kind regards

    Mike

    vExpert 2009

  • AT300-101 - How to make a backup of the operating system?

    Hello

    I'm pulling out my hair! I send you my tablet from toshiba AT300-101 away tomorrow to have the battery changed but realized barely booking email repair said I need to make a backup of the operating system / replacement recovery media. After fishing trawl of the web, trying to figure out how do it, I'm still stuck. can someone help me with this please. It would be a great help.

    Thank you.
    Kate

    Hello

    There are different ways to save the date of the android device.
    You can use some 3rd party backup applications (check the Google game store for available applications), or you can use the internal Android option to save the data, application, Wifi passwords and other settings to google's servers.

    This option can be found in Apps App-> settings-> & backup restore

  • System backup Image against the system recovery disks

    Hello

    I'm new to the system recovery things and I have a question...

    I just bought a new computer laptop m7-1015dx of Pavilion and need to do system recovery discs... (which I realize restore laptop to factory default)... BTW, I have already created the system repair disc.

    However, I read an article on creating a system backup Image allowing you to recovery if lost EVERYTHING, all your installed programs, etc.

    First Question:

    Can someone tell me if I do the backup IMAGE of the system...

    Do I still need to create recovery disk (mfg default) system also?

    The second Question:

    If I create system recovery disks can I still this Recovery Partition?

    I am really really wanting to partition my C:\ drive... it is huge

    In addition, I hate to see storage folders involved in system folders...

    Currently using a symbol/character to separate them.

    From now on, I can't partition the C:\drive all partitions are used as... Max is 4

    and I have 4... C:\drive, System Partition, Partition HPTools and recovery Partition.

    Any help or assistance would be appreciated.

    Thanks for the research.

    Best regards, Jenn

    Hi, Jenn:

    I'd certainly recovery disks because in the case of a hard drive failure, a recovery partition is unnecessary because it would be on the failed drive.

    Recovery disks will do the same as a recovery partition. Reinstall the operating system and programs supplied with your laptop.

    I have also copy off the coast of the C:\drive SWSetup folder and store it on a portable hard drive that contains all files Installer provided with your PC (except MS Office 2010 Starter).

    You can also make your own Windows 7 installation disc and have a nice bloatware without installing windows, and then install only the programs you want from the SWSetup folder.

    Here's how:

    If you can read the Microsoft windows 7 25-character product key, you can download simple Windows 7 ISO files to burn on a DVD for the version of windows that is installed on your PC, and which is listed on the Microsoft COA sticker on your PC case.

    Burn the ISO with the option to burn the ISO on your DVD burning program and burn it at the slowest possible speed that will allow your program. This will create a bootable DVD.

    Or use the installation of Windows 7 USB/DVD tool to compile the ISO file that you download from Digital River. Link and instructions below. You need a 4 GB flash drive to use the USB compilation method.

    http://www.microsoftstore.com/store/msstore/HTML/pbPage.Help_Win7_usbdvd_dwnTool

    Use 25 characters on the PC product key to activate the installation.

    The key will activate a 32 or 64 bit installation.

    Then go to the support of the PC and driver page to install the drivers you need.

    Link to downloads ISO of W7 is below.

    http://www.mydigitallife.info/official-Windows-7-SP1-ISO-from-Digital-River/

    You can get rid of all the partitions you want to if you plan to use recovery or disc of Windows 7 installation method that I posted above.

    I write my product key and store them somewhere for more security that many people report that it fades if you keep the laptop on your lap a lot, and then you wouldn't be able to use the alternative method to install W7.

    Paul

  • backup of the old system changed the type of operating system installation

    After backup all data to your desktop at home and move the backup file on the replacement computer that was running and had been activated, got backup and ran into problems.  The original pc was an OEM system with a valid OEM key and had been activated for years.  The new system is a renewed system which has an apparently valid cd and COA 'For refurbished computers' active fine and had been restarted several times after activation before the fiasco of the backup.

    After that I ran the backup recovery, system was restarted as planned, but when the time came to connect to windows, we encountered a problem of activation.  He said that the system should be activated.  I went ahead and put in the key that is attached to the system (the key for PC) refurbished, but he would go through.  I checked that I read the key from the sticker correctly several times and by two other people.  He would not suffer.  Just on a chance that the backup of the old system caused a little problem, I tried the OEM key that was on the original system.  He's been through.

    If the old system should simply be scrapped, I don't think anything, but it will be either made to disadvantaged youth, so I want to make sure that everything is always good about it and it is all above board.  In its current form of the key is now on two different systems.  What can I do to fix this?

    Hello

    I suggest you to download the tool to update product key on your system and then update the product key and check. Follow the steps mentioned in the article below.

    Update your Windows product key

    http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows/help/genuine/product-key?displaylang=en

    If this does not help, then I suggest you to activate by phone and check.

    How to activate Windows XP

    http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/307890

    Thanks and regards.

    Thahaseena M
    Microsoft Answers Support Engineer.
    Visit our Microsoft answers feedback Forum and let us know what you think.

  • Backup center and restoration', 'System', 'Windows Update', 'Power Options' and a few others in Control Panel not responding

    Original title: clicking on but nothing happens

    When I select "backup and Restore Center', 'System', 'Windows Update', 'Power Options' and a few others in Control Panel, nothing happens. Sometimes a window flashes for a split second before disappearing. Any suggestions?

    Hi Ron68PB,

    1. you remember to make changes to the computer before this problem?

    2 are you able to open other programs?

    3. do you get error messages or error codes?

    Method 1:

    You try to run a SFC scan to check the corrupted system files.

    You can read the following article to launch the SFC scan:

    How to use the System File Checker tool to fix the system files missing or corrupted on Windows Vista or Windows 7

    http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/929833

    Method 2:

    Alternatively, you can try to check if the problem occurs in safe mode.

    Check out the link:

    Start your computer in safe mode

    http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows-Vista/start-your-computer-in-safe-mode

    Hope this information is useful.

    Jeremy K

    Microsoft Answers Support Engineer

  • System could not find the environment option that was entered.

    The Trend Micro Client caused a bit of stir in my computer.

    He gave me the UiSeAgnt.exe error and I couldn't open any .exe files. I uninstalled Trend Micro and that pop up more rises. But the "System could not find the environment option/variable is entered" is yet to come when I try to run the .exe. This means that same cmd cannot be opened. I can not connect to the Internet independently wireless or wired. Audio system is not even the sense system speakers or external audio devices.

    I tried the system restore, did not work. I tried SFC/scannow, did not work. Now my current idea is to back up my files and blow the computer on with a clean restore. What should I do? I use a Vaio E series 14 p, btw.

    If it really comes down to it, how much memory should I backup everything?

    Hi Vey,

    Thanks for posting your query in the Microsoft community.

    Your system is connected to a domain network?

    This problem occurs in situations where Shutdown.exe cannot access the UserDomain environment variable. The task of the judgment which is on demand by using the at command runs under the system account. When the task is run under the System account, the UserDomain environment variable are not accessible because it does not exist. But the problem occurs mainly on the areas of server.

    I would suggest trying the following steps and check if these help to resolve the issue.

    1. start your system in safe mode.

    2. press on the Windows key + R.

    3. type sysdm.cpl , and then click OK.

    4. click on the "Advanced" tab

    5. in "Startup and recovery", click "Environment Variables".

    6. under "System Variables", click 'new '.

    7. for "Variable name", type in windir%

    8. for 'Value of the Variable', type in C:\Windows

    9. click OK on the all the dialog boxes that pop up.

    10. restart your system in normal mode.

    If, however, your system is connected to the normal mode, please see the following support article.

    Computer does not and you receive an error "System cannot find the environment Option that was entered" when you schedule a task of closing using the AT command

    Hope this information is useful. Let us know if you need more help, we will be happy to help you.

  • My system (Vista 32-bit SP2) tried to install update KB980248 for several weeks, but I keep getting error code 80073712.

    My system (Vista 32-bit SP2) tried to install update KB980248 for several weeks, but I keep getting error code 80073712.  I tried to follow the directions on the site by running the system preparation tool update... did not work.  Then I tried to go back to a restore point and try the update again.  Yet once, didn't. I went back several restore points, but it has always failed.  I don't have an installation DVD, because it came with Vista preloaded.

    Help?

    PaulS22401,
    Walk through the steps described in this article: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/957310

    Let us know the results.

    Mike - Engineer Support Microsoft Answers
    Visit our Microsoft answers feedback Forum and let us know what you think.

  • The system could not find the environment option that was entered.

    I have Vista Home Premium. I must have met a significant corruption or a virus. Here's what the system won't let me do.

    System restore
    Launch any program exe
    run cmd as administrator
    launch msconfig
    Basically, everything I download don't throw (including several ladies virus recommended this forum and others)
    If it's a virus, he got by AVG free edition
    Safe mode does not enable all the options I get always "the system could not find the environment option that was entered."
    It of almost as if someone really took time to reflect on how to thwart an attack and then implemented in the opposite direction.

    Is blowing the entire disk and back at my only option?

    Help!; 0

    Zitouni,

    Thanks for your reply, good point on the File Checker, I didn't know that. Unforuneatly I have not see your reply until I decided it was time to re - install the system. One thing to note, I couldn't do a 'run as administrator' anyway possible. This system was really corrupt which leads me to believe that he may have been a NTFS/Fat 32 Co-mingling question. Just a guess, but I really don't see how it could have happened otherwise.

    Another thing to note, if you have a Dell Inspiron 1720 with a 250Gig HD-make sure that you format the partition, you then load the SATA drivers! Also, make sure that the restore partition does not primary. Make sure that you format (assuming that you have backed up your data before!). Otherwise, it hangs on Setup to complete the installation. Who took me ahwhile to understand.

    Everything is cool now (reinstalled Vista), just thank ful there is a site like this to run things by! ;)

    Concerning

    Jeff

  • After the system is booted, the logon process takes 20-30 minutes.

    Microsoft Windows Vista Business SP2 [Version 6.0.6002] / ThinkPad x 301 2776 - A23
    The problem was discovered in November-December 2013.
    After the system is booted, the logon process takes 20-30 minutes (the mouse cursor on the black screen).
    I faced the same behavior in "windows boot" mode when Kaspersky Anti-virus is also uninstalled.
    After 30 minutes, as soon as it was possible to run msconfig, I checked and made sure only microsoft services are running.

    Dear Carlos, thank you very much for the help! The problem was solved by executing the steps suggested in this discussion. Please close this message.

  • At startup, getting the error - the system could not find the environment that was entered

    I have Windows Vista Home Premium and I have the OS on my hard drive with no CD. I get the following error message when I start my laptop on the desk. The system could not find the environment that was entered. What can I do to fix this?

    The only answer I found in Google:
    http://UK.answers.Yahoo.com/question/index?QID=20100411034348AAALd89

    Your laptop you happens to be a Sony Vaio? What model?

  • When you type an e-mail on my computer dell laptop with Vista system interprets constantly my typing as a variety of commands for example find, cancel, etc. cut.

    When you type an e-mail on my computer dell laptop with Vista system interprets constantly my typing as a variety of commands for example find, cancel, etc. cut.

    Hi stuart-vm,.

    I looked at the Dell website for the resolution of the problems of touchpad.
    Look at the troubleshooting here.
    http://support.Dell.com/support/topics/global.aspx/support/KCS/document?docid=277550#Issue0_0

    This is information from Dell:
    Press the NumLock key on your Dell laptop
    In order to have the features of a 101 keyboard keys on a laptop key 85, the NumLock key active keyboard 10 key functions that would be normally resident on the right side of a standard keyboard. Simply press again to return to normal operation

    I don't know if it will help your problem.

    There is a link to the Dell Diagnostics to see if there is a hardware problem:
    http://search.Dell.com/results.aspx?s=DHS&c=us&l=en&CS=19&k=hardware+diagnostics&cat=SUP

    You can post in the Dell Community listed below if the advice above does not help.
    http://en.community.Dell.com/support-forums/laptop/default.aspx

    Thank you

    Marilyn

  • __why my computor still says the system could not find the environment option that was entered when I trey to change settings or load a new program

    the system could not find the environment option that was entered

    Hi Yasish.P,

    Thank you for using the Microsoft Windows Vista Forums.

    I will need some additional information to help you best.

    O when you get this error message?

    Meanwhile, analysis of auditor of file system (CFS) that might help you resolve the issue.

    To determine if the problem you are experiencing is caused by one or more system files that are used by Windows Vista, run the System File Checker tool. The System File Checker tool analyzes the system files and replaces incorrect versions of system files by using the correct versions.

    To determine if the problem you are experiencing is caused by one or more system files that are used by Windows Vista, run the System File Checker tool. The System File Checker tool analyzes the system files and replaces incorrect versions of system files by using the correct versions.

    To run the System File Checker tool, follow these steps:

    1. Click Start and type cmd in the box start the search.

    2. right click on cmd in the list programs and then click Run as administrator.

    If you are prompted for an administrator password or a confirmation, type your password or click on continue

    3. at the command prompt, the following line, and then press ENTER:

    sfc/scannow

    When the analysis is complete, test to see if the problem you are experiencing is resolved. If the problem you are experiencing is not resolved, use the procedure that is described in the section "the System Restore tool.

    Follow the instructions in the link below for more information on scan SFC.

    http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/936212/

    You can see the link below for more information.

    http://social.answers.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/vistasecurity/thread/aa301b37-e6b9-4f8c-B812-3ba2c58e1442

    Please post back and let us know if it helped to solve your problem.

    Kind regards

    KarthiK TP

  • If I buy a used PC that does not have an operating system or OS disc, still has the label of license for windows can download Microsoft windows?

    If I buy a used PC that does not have an operating system or OS disc, still has the label of license for windows can download Microsoft windows?

    N ° you must contact the manufacturer of the computer and asking for a disc of recovery/reinstallation of Windows. Carey Frisch

Maybe you are looking for

  • make all 2009 macbook pro have a fan

    Do all the macbook pro have a fan

  • Satellite Pro A120 (PSAC1E) 4 GB of RAM but 3.3 GB recognized

    All, I upgraded my laptop memory 4 GB 2x2gb modules.However, it seems that the system recognizes only the total memory than 3318 MB! Although it is said that this model is able to extend memory 4 GB, it seems that this is not the case. Has anyone els

  • Contact help

    While I was trying to add a contact in my phone, I have a contact with a similar name, although it is spelled different (one is Toni's Tony) and no matter what I have try adding Tony keeps in contact with Toni... a way to solve this problem

  • How to copy Step.Result.Error.Code in the local Variable

    How can I copy Step.Result.Error.Code to a stage in particulat to a local variable. I want to print the value of Step.Result.Error.Code in my test report. Help, please. Thanks in advance. Kind regards Sagar Joshi

  • Lack of drivers HP 6300 AIO

    Hello I tried several solutions but I can't seem to install on my HP AIO 6300 the following drivers: 1. HDAUDIO\FUNC_01 & VEN_1002 & DEV_AA01 & SUBSYS_00AA0100 & REV_1002HDAUDIO\FUNC_01 & VEN_1002 & DEV_AA01 & SUBSYS_00AA0100 2. HDAUDIO\FUNC_01 & VEN