My computer takes more time to put on than before. Why is this?

Similar Questions

• Cannot use the calendar network unavailable or slow app. The application takes more time to load than expected.

  When you use iCloud on my iMac I get the message "network unavailable or slow. The application takes more time to load than expected. "This has been the case for several hours, but other applications I use (Mail, Contacts, Notes, reminders), all seem to work well.  The

  I have the same message when I try to load the reminders in iCloud. All other applications work correctly. This issue has been ongoing for about a month now.

  Have this problem on my work computer running Windows 7 SP1 Pro and Macbook Air late 2009 w / OS X 10.11

• All of a sudden ODI should take more time than usual executions.

  Hello
  
  I put packages ODI scheduled for execution.
  Since a few days those who take more time to run.
  Before they used to take 1 hour and 30 minutes approx.
  Now they take 3-3 h 15 min approx.
  And there no any significant changes in the data in terms of quantity.
  
  My ODI s version
  
  Standalone Edition Version 11.1.1
  Build ODI_11.1.1.3.0_GENERIC_100623.1635
  
  ODI packages mainly use Oracle as a SOURCE and TARGET DB.
  
  What is - that I need to check to find out the reasons for the sudden increase at run time.
  
  Indications in this regard would be appreciated.
  
  Thank you
  Mahesh

  Mahesh,

  Some queries of the repository allows to retrieve the task of session timings and compare your slow performance to a previous acceptable run, then look the most important changes - it will highlight where you slow down, then its judgment to resolve the matter accordingly.

  See here for some example reports, you might need to tweak to your current version of rest, but I don't think that the table structures have changed that much:
  http://rnm1978.WordPress.com/2010/11/03/analysing-ODI-batch-performance/

• NewElementInHierarchy() - adding new items, gradually takes more time when adding several brothers and sisters

  With my script ESTK, users select the model numbers in the list and then the script inserts an element with a model number is entered in an attribute, an element for each selected model.

  When you add a large number of elements, each element of extra brother takes a little more then the previous item adds. Adding 250 items may take longer than 3-1/2 minutes or more. During the addition of 20, 50 or 75 items happens quickly, without any noticeable length. It is somewhere in the top 110, this is where that starts to get noticed.

  I even used $.hiresTimer and writes the value to the console for each time a model has been added. Because the timer is reset to zero (0) whenever it is called, it was easier to notice than the amount that it incremented from one element to the other got progressively bigger.

  Any ideas as to why it takes so long or reflections on what I could do to speed it up?

  The structure looks like this:

  < PartModels >
  Text < NoteText > < / NoteText >
  < model ModelNumber = "ABC01" / >
  < model ModelNumber = "ABC02" / >
  < model ModelNumber = "DEF03" / >
  < model ModelNumber = "DEF04" / >
  …
  …
  < model ModelNumber = 'XYZ01-A' / >
  < model ModelNumber = "XYZ * B" / >
  < model ModelNumber = "XYZ500" / >
  < / PartModels >

  The script is quite simple: scroll a selected model numbers table, add a new item for each model number and value of the attribute, the value of the model number. It's the short version:

  Function InsertModelElements (modelsToIns, insElemLoc, GVdoc) {}

  var newEleId;

  var newElemLoc = insElemLoc;

  var elemDef is GVdoc.GetNamedElementDef ("Model");.

  for (var i = 0; i < modelsToIns.length; i ++) { / / modelsToIns is the selected model range }

  newEleId = elemDef.NewElementInHierarchy (newElemLoc); //ElementLoc based on NoteText first, last, or absent

  SetAttribute (newEleId, "ModelNumber", null, modelsToIns [i]); //More feature robust to set the attribute
  

  / * Which also works for the layout attribute * /.

  var vattributes = newEleId.GetAttributes ();

  vattributes values [0] [0] = modelsToIns [i];

  newEleId.Attributes = vattributes;

  
  

  / * At one point, I tried to use a new location of the item to the last inserted element, no change * /.

  var newElemRange = setElementSelection (GV_doc, EleId); function that returns the range

  newElemLoc = newNewElemRange.end;

  }

  }

  Any help is appreciated.

  Sincerely,

  Trent

  Thanks Russ,

  I seriously considered trying to copy/paste and started to change the code to do it. But I could not let pass, the answer should be right there in front of me, it's all too long that I worked with this stuff, I am not able to see. Then it dawned on me what's happening.

  In a previous test, I put a timer on each action that is closed. For example, I start with a container element that has 200 children of elements, each with a specific/unique model number attribute. All the 200 existing items are deleted and then replaced with 250 new items with a different value for the attribute of model number. The timer was placed after the Element.Delete () and ElementDef.NewElementInHierarchy () methods. What I've noticed with the timer, it's that each deleted item has been removed as fast as the previous item (so it took progressively less and less time to remove an item). And of course the opposite was noted for insert items, each inserted item has taken longer than the previous inserted item.

  These elements can be inserted in two areas of the structure, one of the neighborhoods within format rules that affect the formatting and is actually a bit faster. This led me to the cause being ESD format rules. The area that takes more time has quite a few rules of extensible format that apply. Whenever an element is inserted or deleted, FrameMaker through these rules for formatting the content of elements. Given that the rules apply to the parent, first, last, next, previous, etc., FrameMaker must apply the rules of the format to all elements of the structure that the rules (which are extremely complex due to various elements, attribute values, and combinations that can be inserted).

  Removal or thinning of the FormatRules in ESD, she becomes faster. But each of the FormatRules are needed. So using app. ApplyFormatRules = false; just before that the elements are deleted and inserted works very well. But the key is to implement ApplyFormatRules return to true before remove the last element should be removed and before inserting the last element to be inserted, so it allows to scroll all the rules of format of ESD for all elements in the hierarchy of these format rules apply to. ApplyFormatRules true and assign the ElementDef until the last item works also [EleId.ElementDef = GV_doc. GetNamedElementDef (insElemType);], but only before all the other functions are performed or different items are added.

  doc. Reformat() will not reformat the content correctly after the fact, because the element has been created without the format rules, so it reformats all the contents of the elements without the format rules.

  The FDK version which was created 10 years ago had the same problem of slow operation when a large number of items have been inserted, but was still an improvement over having manually insert each item, and then type the value of the attribute, if she had lived with.

  He now works surprisingly fast. I hope that my explanation of what I think is happening, including the cause/solution, is understandable.

  Sincerely,

  Trent Schwartz

• Satellite C55-B854 - right click takes more time

  My laptop Satellite C55-B854 takes more time in the right click. Here are few 8.1 window pro.32

  Hello

  Unfortunately, it is not easy to understand. What do you mean exactly with takes longer in a right-click?
  Your laptop is may be busy and when you click the right mouse button to open a menu it takes little time to seconds before it is displayed on the screen.

• MY VAIO LAPTOP(VGN-CR353) RANDOMLY STOPS AND TAKES MORE TIME TO START. SOMETIMES IT STOP WHEN STARTING

  MY VAIO LAPTOP(VGN-CR353) RANDOMLY STOPS AND TAKES MORE TIME TO START. SOMETIMES IT STOP WHEN STARTING

  It seems that the laptop may be overheating.  Are you sure there is enough air past for laptop?  Make sure that it is on a flat surface, with nothing to obstruct the ventilation openings.  Make sure that the vents and fans and heat sinks are free from dust - examine their blowing with compressed air (power of the system first, of course).  Depending on the laptop model, it may be relatively easy to blow off the dust with compressed air, or otherwise clean up things a bit.   Fans should be kept up well - only no right turn when being ripped off.  My Dell laptop has a removable fan (two small screws need to be removed) that can easily be blown.  This also allows access to the fins of the heatsink.

  Some laptops also have a removable filter that traps the dust and must be regularly inspected and cleaned.

  Are all the BIOS settings for the adjustment of the temperature, the value lower than the manufacturer's recommendations and the default values (you need to check the manual of your laptop for this).  Also make sure you run the latest version of BIOS (again, the manual of your laptop would have the details; the manufacturer's website should also have this information).

• update my Photoshop cc through my creative cloud and now takes more time to open the psb files that yesterday were beautiful, moving same layers autour, I now get the beachball! any suggestions?

  update my Photoshop cc through my creative cloud and now takes more time to open the psb files that yesterday were beautiful, moving same layers autour, I now get the beachball! any suggestions?

  Perhaps a preferences Reset could fix.  Cmd k will lead you to the Photoshop preferences where you will see this screen.

  

• Computer takes some time to connect to the internet after sleeping

  Hi, I expect to ask for help with this. When my computer wakes sleeping internet connection takes some time to connect. It's not terribly long (takes like 30 seconds or more) but it is noticeable and annoying. Before when the computer was asleep you might wake only, click Windows Live mail and he would begin to receive messages. Now, if you do this, you get an error message and must quit WLM and restart WLM, so that the computer has enough time to connect to the internet. As before if you clicked on IE after the computer is awake, it would take a couple seconds to connect to the homepage, but now we must wait and wait for it to connect. One thing happened recently is our old modem is dead (it was like half a dozen years or so) so a new modem was connected. No software has been installed, it is possible that the new modem is trying to use the old settings of modems or something? Any help would be appreciated, thanks.

  ComboFix easily your system trash can.  I only watched it once (I'm not a malware specialist) and quickly left alone!

  Also, I see some malware infections who jokes every day with network connectivity.  You can try a restore of the system to a point before the problems started - but then IMMEDIATELY to several antivirus scans to make sure you are always clean.  Here's a list of some free her: http://www.carrona.org/malware.html

  In addition, if you are ready to erase and reinstall WIndows - remember to backup all your stuff first.  If you do a clean installation of Windows, I would also say to wipe the hard drive (use DBAN or KillDisk - both are free w / an internet search).  Don't forget that you have recovery discs this will eliminate also any recovery on the hard drive partition.

  I'm not 100% sure on the key office - but wait that you can talk to someone at the Activation Center and explain that 2 other copies have been deleted.

• Query using progressive relaxation take more time for execution

  HI gurus,
  
  I'm creating a query using the context and the progressive relaxation index
  
  I had started using progressive relaxation after obtaining the forum entries {: identifier of the thread = 2333942}. With the help of progressive relaxation takes more than 7 seconds for each request. Is there a way we can improve the query performance?
  

   create table test_sh4 (text1 clob,text2 clob,text3 clob);
  
  begin
     ctx_ddl.create_preference ('nd_mcd', 'multi_column_datastore');
     ctx_ddl.set_attribute
         ('nd_mcd',
          'columns',
          'replace (text1, '' '', '''') nd1,
           text1 text1,
           replace (text2, '' '', '''') nd2,
           text2 text2');
     ctx_ddl.create_preference ('test_lex1', 'basic_lexer');
     ctx_ddl.set_attribute ('test_lex1', 'whitespace', '/\|-_+');
     ctx_ddl.create_section_group ('test_sg', 'basic_section_group');
     ctx_ddl.add_field_section ('test_sg', 'text1', 'text1', true);
     ctx_ddl.add_field_section ('test_sg', 'nd1', 'nd1', true);
     ctx_ddl.add_field_section ('test_sg', 'text2', 'text2', true);
     ctx_ddl.add_field_section ('test_sg', 'nd2', 'nd2', true);
   end;
  
  create index IX_test_sh4 on test_sh4 (text3)   indextype is ctxsys.context   parameters    ('datastore     nd_mcd   lexer test_lex1 section group     test_sg') ;
  
  alter index IX_test_sh4 REBUILD PARAMETERS ('REPLACE SYNC (ON COMMIT)') ;-- sync index on every commit. 
  
  
  SELECT SCORE(1) score,t.* FROM test_sh4 t WHERE CONTAINS (text3,  '
  <query>
  <textquery>
  <progression>
  <seq>{GIFT GRILL STAPLES CARD} within text1</seq>
  <seq>{GIFTGRILLSTAPLESCARD} within nd1</seq>
  <seq>{GIFT GRILL STAPLES CARD} within text2</seq>
  <seq>{GIFTGRILLSTAPLESCARD} within nd2</seq>
  <seq>((%GIFT% and %GRILL% and %STAPLES% and %CARD%)) within text1</seq>
  <seq>((%GIFT% and %GRILL% and %STAPLES% and %CARD%)) within text2</seq>
  <seq>((%GIFT% and %GRILL% and %STAPLES%) or (%GRILL% and %STAPLES% and %CARD%) or (%GIFT% and %STAPLES% and %CARD%) or (%GIFT% and %GRILL% and %CARD%)) within text1</seq>
  <seq>((%GIFT% and %GRILL% and %STAPLES%) or (%GRILL% and %STAPLES% and %CARD%) or (%GIFT% and %STAPLES% and %CARD%) or (%GIFT% and %GRILL% and %CARD%)) within text2</seq>
  <seq>((%STAPLES% and %CARD%) or (%GIFT% and %GRILL%) or (%GRILL% and %CARD%) or (%GIFT% and %CARD%) or (%GIFT% and %STAPLES%) or (%GRILL% and %STAPLES%)) within text1</seq>
  <seq>((%STAPLES% and %CARD%) or (%GIFT% and %GRILL%) or (%GRILL% and %CARD%) or (%GIFT% and %CARD%) or (%GIFT% and %STAPLES%) or (%GRILL% and %STAPLES%)) within text2</seq>
  <seq>((%GIFT% , %GRILL% , %STAPLES% , %CARD%)) within text1</seq>
  <seq>((%GIFT% , %GRILL% , %STAPLES% , %CARD%)) within text2</seq>
  <seq>((!GIFT and !GRILL and !STAPLES and !CARD)) within text1</seq>
  <seq>((!GIFT and !GRILL and !STAPLES and !CARD)) within text2</seq>
  <seq>((!GIFT and !GRILL and !STAPLES) or (!GRILL and !STAPLES and !CARD) or (!GIFT and !STAPLES and !CARD) or (!GIFT and !GRILL and !CARD)) within text1</seq>
  <seq>((!GIFT and !GRILL and !STAPLES) or (!GRILL and !STAPLES and !CARD) or (!GIFT and !STAPLES and !CARD) or (!GIFT and !GRILL and !CARD)) within text2</seq>
  <seq>((!STAPLES and !CARD) or (!GIFT and !GRILL) or (!GRILL and !CARD) or (!GIFT and !CARD) or (!GIFT and !STAPLES) or (!GRILL and !STAPLES)) within text1</seq>
  <seq>((!STAPLES and !CARD) or (!GIFT and !GRILL) or (!GRILL and !CARD) or (!GIFT and !CARD) or (!GIFT and !STAPLES) or (!GRILL and !STAPLES)) within text2</seq>
  <seq>((!GIFT , !GRILL , !STAPLES , !CARD)) within text1</seq>
  <seq>((!GIFT , !GRILL , !STAPLES , !CARD)) within text2</seq>
  <seq>((?GIFT and ?GRILL and ?STAPLES and ?CARD)) within text1</seq>
  <seq>((?GIFT and ?GRILL and ?STAPLES and ?CARD)) within text2</seq>
  <seq>((?GIFT and ?GRILL and ?STAPLES) or (?GRILL and ?STAPLES and ?CARD) or (?GIFT and ?STAPLES and ?CARD) or (?GIFT and ?GRILL and ?CARD)) within text1</seq>
  <seq>((?GIFT and ?GRILL and ?STAPLES) or (?GRILL and ?STAPLES and ?CARD) or (?GIFT and ?STAPLES and ?CARD) or (?GIFT and ?GRILL and ?CARD)) within text2</seq>
  <seq>((?STAPLES and ?CARD) or (?GIFT and ?GRILL) or (?GRILL and ?CARD) or (?GIFT and ?CARD) or (?GIFT and ?STAPLES) or (?GRILL and ?STAPLES)) within text1</seq>
  <seq>((?STAPLES and ?CARD) or (?GIFT and ?GRILL) or (?GRILL and ?CARD) or (?GIFT and ?CARD) or (?GIFT and ?STAPLES) or (?GRILL and ?STAPLES)) within text2</seq>
  <seq>((?GIFT , ?GRILL , ?STAPLES , ?CARD)) within text1</seq>
  <seq>((?GIFT , ?GRILL , ?STAPLES , ?CARD)) within text2</seq>
  </progression>
  </textquery>
  <score datatype="FLOAT" algorithm="default"/>
  </query>',1) >0 ORDER BY score(1) DESC

  Progressive relaxation works best when you select only a limited number of lines. If you retrieve ALL the rows that satisfy the query, then every step of easing should run without worrying.

  If you collect - say - the first 10 results, then if the first step in the relaxation gives 10 results so there is no need to execute the next step (actually, due to the internal buffering, which won't be exactly true but he is theoretically correct).

  The easiest way to proceed is to reformulate the query in the form

  SELECT * FROM)
  (Score select (1) SCORE, t.* FROM test_sh4 t WHERE CONTAINS (Text3, '))
  
  
  ...
  
  
  (1) > 0 ORDER BY score (1) DESC
  )
  WHERE ROWNUM<=>

  You have discovered that wildcards don't work too well, unless you use SUBSTRING_INDEX. I encourage you to avoid completely if possible, or push down much lower in the progressive relaxation. Usually, GIFT % is a useful term (matches GIFTS, GIFTED, etc.), DON % is generally more effective.

  There are a lot of steps in your progressive relaxation. It you want to reduce the number of steps, you can change:

  ((GIFT and percent of the GRID and STAPLES % and CARD %)) in Text1
  ((GIFT and percent of the GRID and STAPLES % and CARD %)) in Text2

  TO

  ((CADEAU % et % de la GRILLE et AGRAFES % et CARTE %) * 2) within Text1 ACCUM ((GIFT and percent of the GRID and STAPLES % and CARD %)) in Text2

  I don't know if it would have performance benefits - but it is worth trying to see.

• Why does take more time to load a program into windows 7 on vista

  Windows 7 takes longer to load a program than vista, when you play chess in yahoo, the table was loaded into a flash in win 7 it takes about 10/15 seconds

  Hi Cornishmick,

  Welcome to the Microsoft Answers Community Forum site!

  In order to resolve your issue, please provide additional information?

  1. What version of Windows 7, you use? (Home Premium, Ultimate etc.,)
  2. Faced with this problem only when playing chess or any other game too?

  First of all, I suggest you to download the latest version of the Flash player from Adobe, which is compatible with Windows 7 by visiting the mentioned the link below and check if it solves your problem.

  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/936213/

  Let us know if we can be of further assistance.

  Thank you best regards &,.

  Calogero - Microsoft technical support.
  Visit our Microsoft answers feedback Forum
  http://social.answers.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/answersfeedback/threads/ and tell us what you think

• When I start the computer it takes more time

  * Original title: windows7 problem

  Sir I am on windows 7 ultimate. My problem is that when I star our sytem taking long time 6-7 minutes. Windows formats 3 - 4 times but still these problem and the functions are slow.what I...

  If after a reinstallation is complete, the computer is still slow, look to the material being the problem. The most likely cause is a failed hard drive.

  Hard drive utilities. You can test the drive with whchever is appropriate for your drive hard brand and model...

  Western Digital and Hitachi... http://support.wdc.com/product/download.asp?lang=en

  Samsung, Seagate and Maxtor... http://www.Seagate.com/support/downloads/

• Microsoft SQL Server 2005 Express edition SP3 (KB955607) takes more time to install

  Original title: Microsoft SQL Server 2005 Express edition SP3 install (KB955607)

  Hello

  I found that this installation updates automatic updates really time consuming (perhaps too long)...

  How long does take his will?

  Sometimes it's really bothering me, because I want to turn my computer as soon as POSSIBLE...

  I checked the upfates installed, and there are microsoft .NET framework 3.51, commented 'managed '...

  Then, I tried to turn off my antivirus, and it works!

  Thanks again!

• When online, it takes more time to copy and paste something.

  Original title: copy paste

  When I'm online, while copying and pasting. Since the installation of the version of xp blade, it takes longer to copy paste something. I want to copy paste to work way is use too, faster and not loading in the bar each time trying to copy paste search something online? Thanks Guy

  Hello

  1. what browser do you use?

  2 are you facing the question that when you're online?

  If you use Internet Explorer (IE), then you try to optimize IE and check if it helps.

  For more information, please see the following article and check.

  Internet Explorer is slow? 5 things to try

  Check if the problem occurs in safe mode with network and let us know the results.

  A description of the options to start in Windows XP Mode

• Installation of updates Windos takes more time.

  OT: johnbelinski1.

  I made the mistake of buying a new computer with Windows 8. I've had for over a year and just stopped using it for several months.  I will never buy another computer with a microsoft product in this regard.

  I wanted to get a file on this computer, but it said I had to install 6 updates until I could use the computer.  For more than 30 minutes and it is always the current 6.  What can I do to access my account?

  Hello

  Some updates can take a while to install, so please be patient.

  However, let us know if it is always installing an hour.

  Thank you

  Party of Lighthouse

• Consolidation takes more time in 11.1.2.3!

  Hi guys

  There are 1 consolidation which takes nearly 20 minutes while operating in HFM.

  The c: drive is allocated nearly 50 GB, 5 GB is available.

  The other drive on which is installed the HFM is nearly 67 GB free on 80 GB.

  The pagefile.sys size is almost 32 GB on the C: drive, which is recommended to be kept as a 45 GB.

  No problem with the rule that it consolidates very less features. It shouldn't take a lot of time. Can C: which is available for only 5 GB of disk space can affect the functioning of the consolidation in morals. Like, Oracle is recommended to be kept as 100 GB.

  Please guide experts.

  Thank you

  Saurabh Mehta

  Hello. I would start by cleaning the audit trail for data. 200million is a bit much. The extent of C of disk space, it wouldn't have hurt to give him more space, but I don't think that's the problem (maybe wrong of course).

  Have a 20-minute consolidation includes a large number of factors not mentioned here: density of data, rules, metadata, version, etc. Some companies would like him if their consolidation was only 20 minutes.

  Eric