Satellite C55-B854 - right click takes more time

My laptop Satellite C55-B854 takes more time in the right click. Here are few 8.1 window pro.32

Hello

Unfortunately, it is not easy to understand. What do you mean exactly with takes longer in a right-click?
Your laptop is may be busy and when you click the right mouse button to open a menu it takes little time to seconds before it is displayed on the screen.

Tags: Toshiba

Similar Questions

  • My computer takes more time to put on than before. Why is this?

    Original title: slow system

    My computer takes more time to put on than before. Is this because too many files on my computer?

    Take a look in the system and Application logs in the errors and warnings event viewer and post here the copies. Do not post on that more than 48 hours ago.

    You can access event viewer by selecting Start, Control Panel, administrative tools, and Event Viewer. When searching for the meaning of the error, information about the event ID, Source and Description are important.

    A tip for posting copies of error reports! Run Event Viewer and double-click the error you want to copy. You will see a button resembling two pages. Click on the button and close Event Viewer. This places a copy of the report to your Clipboard. Paste it into the body of your message. Make sure that it is the first dough right out of the event viewer.

    Try Ctrl + Alt + Delete, select Task Manager, and then click the performance tab. Under Commit Charge, which is the Total, limit, and the pic?

    You should be able to gather more information from the Task Manager. Open the process tab, select View, Select, columns and check the boxes before maximum memory usage and virtual memory size. What are the figures for the 6 process using larger quantities?

    Select Start, all programs, accessories, System Tools, cleaning disk to emptying your trash, delete temporary Internet files and other selected options. I recommend also you click Other Options, System Restore and delete all but the last system restore point. Run Disk Defragmenter.

    Using the system restore option is most appropriate when your system is slow and you need to increase the free disk space on your C partition. If you have errors that could be solved by using the system restore to your system settings back to before the error occurred initially do not use this option.

    If more than one person uses the computer and they have their own user log you need to run Disk Cleanup in each user profile that you want to delete all the unwanted files.

    A better program of disk cleanup is cCleaner but note that cCleaner will not manage system restore points. Remove the old restore points can be important if you have little free disk space. cCleaner comes with a registry tool. Do not use this tool as any registry cleaner could lead to the creation of very difficult to resolve system errors.

    http://www.CCleaner.com/download

    Hope this helps, Gerry Cornell

  • MY VAIO LAPTOP(VGN-CR353) RANDOMLY STOPS AND TAKES MORE TIME TO START. SOMETIMES IT STOP WHEN STARTING

    MY VAIO LAPTOP(VGN-CR353) RANDOMLY STOPS AND TAKES MORE TIME TO START. SOMETIMES IT STOP WHEN STARTING

    It seems that the laptop may be overheating.  Are you sure there is enough air past for laptop?  Make sure that it is on a flat surface, with nothing to obstruct the ventilation openings.  Make sure that the vents and fans and heat sinks are free from dust - examine their blowing with compressed air (power of the system first, of course).  Depending on the laptop model, it may be relatively easy to blow off the dust with compressed air, or otherwise clean up things a bit.   Fans should be kept up well - only no right turn when being ripped off.  My Dell laptop has a removable fan (two small screws need to be removed) that can easily be blown.  This also allows access to the fins of the heatsink.

    Some laptops also have a removable filter that traps the dust and must be regularly inspected and cleaned.

    Are all the BIOS settings for the adjustment of the temperature, the value lower than the manufacturer's recommendations and the default values (you need to check the manual of your laptop for this).  Also make sure you run the latest version of BIOS (again, the manual of your laptop would have the details; the manufacturer's website should also have this information).

  • NewElementInHierarchy() - adding new items, gradually takes more time when adding several brothers and sisters

    With my script ESTK, users select the model numbers in the list and then the script inserts an element with a model number is entered in an attribute, an element for each selected model.

    When you add a large number of elements, each element of extra brother takes a little more then the previous item adds. Adding 250 items may take longer than 3-1/2 minutes or more. During the addition of 20, 50 or 75 items happens quickly, without any noticeable length. It is somewhere in the top 110, this is where that starts to get noticed.

    I even used $.hiresTimer and writes the value to the console for each time a model has been added. Because the timer is reset to zero (0) whenever it is called, it was easier to notice than the amount that it incremented from one element to the other got progressively bigger.

    Any ideas as to why it takes so long or reflections on what I could do to speed it up?

    The structure looks like this:

    < PartModels >
    Text < NoteText > < / NoteText >
    < model ModelNumber = "ABC01" / >
    < model ModelNumber = "ABC02" / >
    < model ModelNumber = "DEF03" / >
    < model ModelNumber = "DEF04" / >


    < model ModelNumber = 'XYZ01-A' / >
    < model ModelNumber = "XYZ * B" / >
    < model ModelNumber = "XYZ500" / >
    < / PartModels >

    The script is quite simple: scroll a selected model numbers table, add a new item for each model number and value of the attribute, the value of the model number. It's the short version:

    Function InsertModelElements (modelsToIns, insElemLoc, GVdoc) {}

    var newEleId;

    var newElemLoc = insElemLoc;

    var elemDef is GVdoc.GetNamedElementDef ("Model");.

    for (var i = 0; i < modelsToIns.length; i ++) { / / modelsToIns is the selected model range }

    newEleId = elemDef.NewElementInHierarchy (newElemLoc); //ElementLoc based on NoteText first, last, or absent

    SetAttribute (newEleId, "ModelNumber", null, modelsToIns [i]); //More feature robust to set the attribute

    / * Which also works for the layout attribute * /.

    var vattributes = newEleId.GetAttributes ();

    vattributes values [0] [0] = modelsToIns [i];

    newEleId.Attributes = vattributes;


    / * At one point, I tried to use a new location of the item to the last inserted element, no change * /.

    var newElemRange = setElementSelection (GV_doc, EleId); function that returns the range

    newElemLoc = newNewElemRange.end;

    }

    }

    Any help is appreciated.

    Sincerely,

    Trent

    Thanks Russ,

    I seriously considered trying to copy/paste and started to change the code to do it. But I could not let pass, the answer should be right there in front of me, it's all too long that I worked with this stuff, I am not able to see. Then it dawned on me what's happening.

    In a previous test, I put a timer on each action that is closed. For example, I start with a container element that has 200 children of elements, each with a specific/unique model number attribute. All the 200 existing items are deleted and then replaced with 250 new items with a different value for the attribute of model number. The timer was placed after the Element.Delete () and ElementDef.NewElementInHierarchy () methods. What I've noticed with the timer, it's that each deleted item has been removed as fast as the previous item (so it took progressively less and less time to remove an item). And of course the opposite was noted for insert items, each inserted item has taken longer than the previous inserted item.

    These elements can be inserted in two areas of the structure, one of the neighborhoods within format rules that affect the formatting and is actually a bit faster. This led me to the cause being ESD format rules. The area that takes more time has quite a few rules of extensible format that apply. Whenever an element is inserted or deleted, FrameMaker through these rules for formatting the content of elements. Given that the rules apply to the parent, first, last, next, previous, etc., FrameMaker must apply the rules of the format to all elements of the structure that the rules (which are extremely complex due to various elements, attribute values, and combinations that can be inserted).

    Removal or thinning of the FormatRules in ESD, she becomes faster. But each of the FormatRules are needed. So using app. ApplyFormatRules = false; just before that the elements are deleted and inserted works very well. But the key is to implement ApplyFormatRules return to true before remove the last element should be removed and before inserting the last element to be inserted, so it allows to scroll all the rules of format of ESD for all elements in the hierarchy of these format rules apply to. ApplyFormatRules true and assign the ElementDef until the last item works also [EleId.ElementDef = GV_doc. GetNamedElementDef (insElemType);], but only before all the other functions are performed or different items are added.

    doc. Reformat() will not reformat the content correctly after the fact, because the element has been created without the format rules, so it reformats all the contents of the elements without the format rules.

    The FDK version which was created 10 years ago had the same problem of slow operation when a large number of items have been inserted, but was still an improvement over having manually insert each item, and then type the value of the attribute, if she had lived with.

    He now works surprisingly fast. I hope that my explanation of what I think is happening, including the cause/solution, is understandable.

    Sincerely,

    Trent Schwartz

  • Cannot use the calendar network unavailable or slow app. The application takes more time to load than expected.

    When you use iCloud on my iMac I get the message "network unavailable or slow. The application takes more time to load than expected. "This has been the case for several hours, but other applications I use (Mail, Contacts, Notes, reminders), all seem to work well.  The

    I have the same message when I try to load the reminders in iCloud. All other applications work correctly. This issue has been ongoing for about a month now.

    Have this problem on my work computer running Windows 7 SP1 Pro and Macbook Air late 2009 w / OS X 10.11

  • update my Photoshop cc through my creative cloud and now takes more time to open the psb files that yesterday were beautiful, moving same layers autour, I now get the beachball! any suggestions?

    update my Photoshop cc through my creative cloud and now takes more time to open the psb files that yesterday were beautiful, moving same layers autour, I now get the beachball! any suggestions?

    Perhaps a preferences Reset could fix.  Cmd k will lead you to the Photoshop preferences where you will see this screen.

  • All of a sudden ODI should take more time than usual executions.

    Hello

    I put packages ODI scheduled for execution.
    Since a few days those who take more time to run.
    Before they used to take 1 hour and 30 minutes approx.
    Now they take 3-3 h 15 min approx.
    And there no any significant changes in the data in terms of quantity.

    My ODI s version

    Standalone Edition Version 11.1.1
    Build ODI_11.1.1.3.0_GENERIC_100623.1635

    ODI packages mainly use Oracle as a SOURCE and TARGET DB.

    What is - that I need to check to find out the reasons for the sudden increase at run time.

    Indications in this regard would be appreciated.

    Thank you
    Mahesh

    Mahesh,

    Some queries of the repository allows to retrieve the task of session timings and compare your slow performance to a previous acceptable run, then look the most important changes - it will highlight where you slow down, then its judgment to resolve the matter accordingly.

    See here for some example reports, you might need to tweak to your current version of rest, but I don't think that the table structures have changed that much:
    http://rnm1978.WordPress.com/2010/11/03/analysing-ODI-batch-performance/

  • When playing VLC media player it take about 20 to 30 seconds to open. When I push a right-click take about 3-5 seconds to open, why the difference?

    original title: on laptop
    I have a computer dell laptop (N4050). My lappi work slowly, when you play it take about 20 to 30 seconds to open the VLC media player. When I push right click it take about 3-5 seconds to open.
    so. Mr President, give me the solution to my problem.

    Hello

    1. which version of the operating system is installed?

    2. is the VLC media player-specific question?

    Try the following steps.

    Clean boot the computer and then try to open the VLC media player. Tuning your system to start in mode minimum state helps to identify third-party applications or startup items are causing the problem.

    How to troubleshoot a problem by performing a clean boot in Windows Vista or Windows 7:
    http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/929135

    Note: After the boot minimum troubleshooting step, follow step 7 in the link provided to return the computer to a Normal startup mode.

    Reference:

    Optimize Windows 7 for better performance: http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows7/optimize-Windows-7-for-better-performance

    Slow PC? Optimize your computer for maximum performance: http://www.microsoft.com/athome/setup/optimize.aspx

    I hope this helps.

  • Satellite C50-A560 - right-click suddenly stopped working

    So Hey all,.

    I was watching a movie on my laptop 2 days ago, but all of a sudden the right click doesn't work anymore! I tried to reinstall the driver and it worked for a little bit but it kept spamming the right click menu.

    But now it doesn't work at all. Why did this happened?

    It is not easy to explain what the problem is here.
    On the first try, please to test the functionality of touchpad in general. If your computer uses a Synaptics software please open it and change the options for touchpad left and right button, just to see if something will change.

    In the end, I have to ask if everything else, except the right touchpad button, works correctly?

  • Satellite P50T-AO1C - right click touchpad key is oud and hard to press

    Hi guys,.

    Just bought a new laptop and I noticed that the key to the right click is very strong and hard to support, the left click is normal, quiet and light press.

    It is the most expensive phone in the store with the 4th gen i7... but the click sounds right and feels like something of a laptop computer 10 years ago. Does anyone else have this problem?

    Think I could go back I do not like to use it.

    I agree... visit the laptop dealer, show him the problem of button test button on another unit of P50T and request replacement.

  • Query using progressive relaxation take more time for execution

    HI gurus,

    I'm creating a query using the context and the progressive relaxation index

    I had started using progressive relaxation after obtaining the forum entries {: identifier of the thread = 2333942}. With the help of progressive relaxation takes more than 7 seconds for each request. Is there a way we can improve the query performance?
     create table test_sh4 (text1 clob,text2 clob,text3 clob);
    
    begin
       ctx_ddl.create_preference ('nd_mcd', 'multi_column_datastore');
       ctx_ddl.set_attribute
           ('nd_mcd',
            'columns',
            'replace (text1, '' '', '''') nd1,
             text1 text1,
             replace (text2, '' '', '''') nd2,
             text2 text2');
       ctx_ddl.create_preference ('test_lex1', 'basic_lexer');
       ctx_ddl.set_attribute ('test_lex1', 'whitespace', '/\|-_+');
       ctx_ddl.create_section_group ('test_sg', 'basic_section_group');
       ctx_ddl.add_field_section ('test_sg', 'text1', 'text1', true);
       ctx_ddl.add_field_section ('test_sg', 'nd1', 'nd1', true);
       ctx_ddl.add_field_section ('test_sg', 'text2', 'text2', true);
       ctx_ddl.add_field_section ('test_sg', 'nd2', 'nd2', true);
     end;
    
    create index IX_test_sh4 on test_sh4 (text3)   indextype is ctxsys.context   parameters    ('datastore     nd_mcd   lexer test_lex1 section group     test_sg') ;
    
    alter index IX_test_sh4 REBUILD PARAMETERS ('REPLACE SYNC (ON COMMIT)') ;-- sync index on every commit. 
    
    
    SELECT SCORE(1) score,t.* FROM test_sh4 t WHERE CONTAINS (text3,  '
    <query>
    <textquery>
    <progression>
    <seq>{GIFT GRILL STAPLES CARD} within text1</seq>
    <seq>{GIFTGRILLSTAPLESCARD} within nd1</seq>
    <seq>{GIFT GRILL STAPLES CARD} within text2</seq>
    <seq>{GIFTGRILLSTAPLESCARD} within nd2</seq>
    <seq>((%GIFT% and %GRILL% and %STAPLES% and %CARD%)) within text1</seq>
    <seq>((%GIFT% and %GRILL% and %STAPLES% and %CARD%)) within text2</seq>
    <seq>((%GIFT% and %GRILL% and %STAPLES%) or (%GRILL% and %STAPLES% and %CARD%) or (%GIFT% and %STAPLES% and %CARD%) or (%GIFT% and %GRILL% and %CARD%)) within text1</seq>
    <seq>((%GIFT% and %GRILL% and %STAPLES%) or (%GRILL% and %STAPLES% and %CARD%) or (%GIFT% and %STAPLES% and %CARD%) or (%GIFT% and %GRILL% and %CARD%)) within text2</seq>
    <seq>((%STAPLES% and %CARD%) or (%GIFT% and %GRILL%) or (%GRILL% and %CARD%) or (%GIFT% and %CARD%) or (%GIFT% and %STAPLES%) or (%GRILL% and %STAPLES%)) within text1</seq>
    <seq>((%STAPLES% and %CARD%) or (%GIFT% and %GRILL%) or (%GRILL% and %CARD%) or (%GIFT% and %CARD%) or (%GIFT% and %STAPLES%) or (%GRILL% and %STAPLES%)) within text2</seq>
    <seq>((%GIFT% , %GRILL% , %STAPLES% , %CARD%)) within text1</seq>
    <seq>((%GIFT% , %GRILL% , %STAPLES% , %CARD%)) within text2</seq>
    <seq>((!GIFT and !GRILL and !STAPLES and !CARD)) within text1</seq>
    <seq>((!GIFT and !GRILL and !STAPLES and !CARD)) within text2</seq>
    <seq>((!GIFT and !GRILL and !STAPLES) or (!GRILL and !STAPLES and !CARD) or (!GIFT and !STAPLES and !CARD) or (!GIFT and !GRILL and !CARD)) within text1</seq>
    <seq>((!GIFT and !GRILL and !STAPLES) or (!GRILL and !STAPLES and !CARD) or (!GIFT and !STAPLES and !CARD) or (!GIFT and !GRILL and !CARD)) within text2</seq>
    <seq>((!STAPLES and !CARD) or (!GIFT and !GRILL) or (!GRILL and !CARD) or (!GIFT and !CARD) or (!GIFT and !STAPLES) or (!GRILL and !STAPLES)) within text1</seq>
    <seq>((!STAPLES and !CARD) or (!GIFT and !GRILL) or (!GRILL and !CARD) or (!GIFT and !CARD) or (!GIFT and !STAPLES) or (!GRILL and !STAPLES)) within text2</seq>
    <seq>((!GIFT , !GRILL , !STAPLES , !CARD)) within text1</seq>
    <seq>((!GIFT , !GRILL , !STAPLES , !CARD)) within text2</seq>
    <seq>((?GIFT and ?GRILL and ?STAPLES and ?CARD)) within text1</seq>
    <seq>((?GIFT and ?GRILL and ?STAPLES and ?CARD)) within text2</seq>
    <seq>((?GIFT and ?GRILL and ?STAPLES) or (?GRILL and ?STAPLES and ?CARD) or (?GIFT and ?STAPLES and ?CARD) or (?GIFT and ?GRILL and ?CARD)) within text1</seq>
    <seq>((?GIFT and ?GRILL and ?STAPLES) or (?GRILL and ?STAPLES and ?CARD) or (?GIFT and ?STAPLES and ?CARD) or (?GIFT and ?GRILL and ?CARD)) within text2</seq>
    <seq>((?STAPLES and ?CARD) or (?GIFT and ?GRILL) or (?GRILL and ?CARD) or (?GIFT and ?CARD) or (?GIFT and ?STAPLES) or (?GRILL and ?STAPLES)) within text1</seq>
    <seq>((?STAPLES and ?CARD) or (?GIFT and ?GRILL) or (?GRILL and ?CARD) or (?GIFT and ?CARD) or (?GIFT and ?STAPLES) or (?GRILL and ?STAPLES)) within text2</seq>
    <seq>((?GIFT , ?GRILL , ?STAPLES , ?CARD)) within text1</seq>
    <seq>((?GIFT , ?GRILL , ?STAPLES , ?CARD)) within text2</seq>
    </progression>
    </textquery>
    <score datatype="FLOAT" algorithm="default"/>
    </query>',1) >0 ORDER BY score(1) DESC

    Progressive relaxation works best when you select only a limited number of lines. If you retrieve ALL the rows that satisfy the query, then every step of easing should run without worrying.

    If you collect - say - the first 10 results, then if the first step in the relaxation gives 10 results so there is no need to execute the next step (actually, due to the internal buffering, which won't be exactly true but he is theoretically correct).

    The easiest way to proceed is to reformulate the query in the form

    SELECT * FROM)
    (Score select (1) SCORE, t.* FROM test_sh4 t WHERE CONTAINS (Text3, '))


    ...


    (1) > 0 ORDER BY score (1) DESC
    )
    WHERE ROWNUM<=>

    You have discovered that wildcards don't work too well, unless you use SUBSTRING_INDEX. I encourage you to avoid completely if possible, or push down much lower in the progressive relaxation. Usually, GIFT % is a useful term (matches GIFTS, GIFTED, etc.), DON % is generally more effective.

    There are a lot of steps in your progressive relaxation. It you want to reduce the number of steps, you can change:

    ((GIFT and percent of the GRID and STAPLES % and CARD %)) in Text1
    ((GIFT and percent of the GRID and STAPLES % and CARD %)) in Text2

    TO

    ((CADEAU % et % de la GRILLE et AGRAFES % et CARTE %) * 2) within Text1 ACCUM ((GIFT and percent of the GRID and STAPLES % and CARD %)) in Text2

    I don't know if it would have performance benefits - but it is worth trying to see.

  • When online, it takes more time to copy and paste something.

    Original title: copy paste

    When I'm online, while copying and pasting. Since the installation of the version of xp blade, it takes longer to copy paste something. I want to copy paste to work way is use too, faster and not loading in the bar each time trying to copy paste search something online? Thanks Guy

    Hello

    1. what browser do you use?

    2 are you facing the question that when you're online?

    If you use Internet Explorer (IE), then you try to optimize IE and check if it helps.

    For more information, please see the following article and check.

    Internet Explorer is slow? 5 things to try

    Check if the problem occurs in safe mode with network and let us know the results.

    A description of the options to start in Windows XP Mode

  • Windows photo viewer take more time to load images

    Hello, I am using win7 ultimate 64-bit for the last 6 months
    Evrything works smooth and enjoyable!
    but these last days, I'm affected by the problem of serious performance with photo viwer
    Windows Photo Viewer takes too long to load the images, all formats, even the small files
    Photo loads initially rapid, but clicking next takes too long to load the next image
    I'm not against hepatitis a live windows installed... im using the supplied with windows photo viewer
    I deleted the temp folder is defragmented my disc and I use photoshop and other software without problem

    IM using the Intel dual core with 2 GB of ram and 256 MB of integrated graphics (g33/g31)

    Thnx in advance

    Considering how old of a photo viewer program is and has also been replaced by windows live essentials 2011 and his photo gallery.

    This is what an amazing photo viewer is always listed as an option.

    Upgrade,

    http://explore.live.com/Windows-Live-Essentials?OS=other

    Or more easy little is here,

    http://explore.live.com/Windows-Live-Essentials-XP

    And Yes, this x - p version will work well with win-7.

  • Menu start takes more time to load than usual

    Original title: Start Menu does load not start computer...

    When I start my computer, and even after he has worked for minutes, or hours... from the Start Menu does not load, and only after I clicked to open it, clicked off of it (to close), wait 10 to 20 seconds or more, then click on back on that everything will appear (something is there, right away like pin programs) , but recently used programs, and recent documents (the small arrows next to pin/freq used) do not appear until after I go through the above process...

    Does anyone know why this might be?

    Hello

    1 did you change on your computer before the show?

    2. you remember installing any application, then this problem started?

    Follow the steps mentioned below:

    Method 1:

    Step 1:

    Safe mode, start Windows in a limited State, where only the essential is started. If a problem does reappear when you start in safe mode, you can eliminate the default settings and basic device drivers and services as causes possible

    Start your computer in safe mode with networking

    http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows7/advanced-startup-options-including-safe-mode

    Step 2:

    A clean boot helps eliminate software conflicts. The article below describes how to solve problems in Windows 7 by performing a clean boot. This article also describes how to start the Windows Installer service and how to reset the computer so that it starts as usual. To configure your computer to clean boot see the following link.

    How to troubleshoot a problem by performing a clean boot in Windows Vista or in Windows 7

    http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/929135

    Note: When you are finished troubleshooting, follow step 7 in the article to start on normal startup.

    Method 2:

    Optimize Windows 7 for better performance

    http://Windows.Microsoft.com/is-is/Windows7/optimize-Windows-7-for-better-performance

  • Consolidation takes more time in 11.1.2.3!

    Hi guys

    There are 1 consolidation which takes nearly 20 minutes while operating in HFM.

    The c: drive is allocated nearly 50 GB, 5 GB is available.

    The other drive on which is installed the HFM is nearly 67 GB free on 80 GB.

    The pagefile.sys size is almost 32 GB on the C: drive, which is recommended to be kept as a 45 GB.

    No problem with the rule that it consolidates very less features. It shouldn't take a lot of time. Can C: which is available for only 5 GB of disk space can affect the functioning of the consolidation in morals. Like, Oracle is recommended to be kept as 100 GB.

    Please guide experts.

    Thank you

    Saurabh Mehta

    Hello. I would start by cleaning the audit trail for data. 200million is a bit much. The extent of C of disk space, it wouldn't have hurt to give him more space, but I don't think that's the problem (maybe wrong of course).

    Have a 20-minute consolidation includes a large number of factors not mentioned here: density of data, rules, metadata, version, etc. Some companies would like him if their consolidation was only 20 minutes.

    Eric

Maybe you are looking for