my pc cannot create an ad-hoc, why? all that says is that windows nt cannot create a

Similar Questions

• Windows Media Player 12/Windows 7; Why my computer says "Windows Media Player cannot read the Blue Ray Disc. The disk has been created in a way that the player does not support.

  Why my computer says "Windows Media Player cannot read the Blue Ray Disc. The disk has been created in a way that the player does not support "?  I have Windows Media Player 12 and it comes a new movie.  I can play other discs blue ray on this computer, but not this one.  Is there an update that I'm missing or a codec I need?

  Thank you

  This new film format is not supported by Windows Media Player, here is a link on how to play a dvd on windows media... player and codecs...

  http://windows.microsoft.com/en-us/windows7/Play-a-CD-or-DVD-in-Windows-Media-Player.

  If you can not play... try using third-party codecs, but at your own risk :D

  Hope this helps you :)

• Normally, when I log on my Mac, I have a log in and then I have my counter top.  I suddenly tonight, another newspaper in the window, and it asks for a password, I didn't create, so cannot go beyond that window.  Anyone know what it is?

  Normally, when I log on my Mac, I have a log in and then I have my counter top.  I suddenly tonight, another newspaper in the window, and it asks for a password, I didn't create, so cannot go beyond that window.  Anyone know what it is?

  This window appears before or after the usual? What is it exactly?

• Why is - that cannot you open .flv files in Premiere Pro?

  .flv files are Flash Video, an Adobe product. Premiere Pro is an Adobe product. Why is - that cannot you open an Adobe product in another Adobe product?

  Darrell Leland

  I don't think that flv is supposed to be edited... it is an output file

• Why is - that someone else cannot import my raw images in their Lightroom? They import fine in mine...

  I'm a second shooter and when the photographer, for it to work I will import my images in Lightroom on his computer, it says there is an error and it won't import them. I shoot Nikon and she shoots Canon, so I don't know if this has something to do with it, but our file handling preferences are the same and I can upload the images in Lightroom on my computer without problem. She has 4 of Lightroom and I have 5, but I still don't think that should make a difference. All that I'm missing?

  Each new case uses a new file format, even though they share the same file extension.

  It seems that your camera was created after LR 4 came out, so LR4 knows not how to read the "new" files

  Your LR5 came out after your camera has been made, so he doesn't know how to read the files.

  Short of its LR4 upgrade to version 5 or 6, she will need download a more recent version of the DNG Converter, convert your NAVE DNG files, then import the DNG files.

• Why is-36 of Firefox on Windows receiving connections from DNS servers? Option network.dns.get - ttl

  Following update Firefox 36, my firewall was flooding asking me to allow external connections from the Internet to my browser. Looking at it more closely, Comodo Firewall indicates that external websites are trying to connect to Firefox, port 53 to an arbitrary port on my machine.

  If I disable the option FF36 new network.dns.get - ttl, it stops. I can't find any documentation or help on this option.

  Why Firefox do this? Is Comodo incorrect when he labels it as an external connection attempt? (It has normally been extremely good to differentiate the incoming and outgoing traffic). I guess that Firefox is trying to determine the TTL for DNS caching, but it is not make sense why DNS servers then try to connect to me.

  I am reluctant to create a firewall rule to that arbitrary Internet connections on my machine are OK as long as their origin on port 53, tips on how to manage all that this new feature is firmly States would be appreciated.

  Thanks in advance for any help.

  Hi grammarye,

  Yes, you're right in thinking that Firefox is trying to find the TTL value. This is new in Firefox 36 behavior and was presented as services frequently changing DNS records (such as Cloudflare) were not working properly for Firefox users.

  Firefox makes asynchronous DNS searches - which means it will make a DNS query and then proceed to perform another task instead of waiting for an answer.

  Your ISP DNS server puts in cache only TTL an area for a short time, so if it does not the current LIFE expectancy, he will interview with other DNS servers to find.

  IANAE, but probably what is happening is:

  1. Firefox tries to find the DNS record for the domain that you want to connect to
  2. Your ISP DNS server does not have the current LIFE expectancy, then connects with other DNS servers to find
  3. During this time, Firefox lingers with something else
  4. DNS server, then reconnects to give you full DNS, including the TTL check
  5. Comodo sees the packets of the DNS server and panic

  I completely agree that arbitrary ports of white list is a bad idea, but in this case, the behavior is completely harmless.

  You can want to whitelist Firefox in your Comodo Firewall, or continue to let network.dns.get - disabled ttl.

  (edited to fix broken links and add a sentence)

• After download of Internet Explorer 8 I can't open all the icons in the control panel. On display is come information that Windows cannot find 'C\WINDOWS\system32\rundll.32.exe '.

  Dear Sir/Madam,

  Yesterday, I downloaded Microsoft Internet Explorer 8 web from Microsoft Download Center.

  After downloading Microsoft Internet Explorer 8, I can't open any icons in the control panel.

  On display is come information that Windows cannot find 'C\WINDOWS\system32\rundll.32.exe '.

  Help, please. Thanks Gene.

  Thanks Gene.

  Dear: :

  Running sfc/scannow will not replace the missing rundll32.exe file.

  Why you post methods that do not work and will be just wasting time?

  Hove you never even seen this problem before, tried to recreate it so that you can actually see, or have you never really fixed?

  Why you learn not what sfc/scannow does and does not do?

  Here is a simple test to you and all your colleagues in the technical support engineer:

  Rename or delete just your c:\windows\system32\rundll32.exe file is "missing".

  Rename rundll32.exe---> rundll32.xxx

  If you started normally, before you can blink, the 'missing' rundll32.exe file quickly and quietly replace the copy in the dllcache folder.  It is the Protection of Windows file in action and you will see something like this in the Event Viewer log system:

  Event type: Information
  Event source: Windows File Protection
  Event category: no
  Event ID: 64002
  Description:
  File replacement was attempted on the protected system file c:\windows\system32\rundll32.exe. This file was restored to the original version to maintain system stability. The file version of the system file is 5.1.2600.5512.

  I beg you to perform this simple test to know how the sfc/scannow:

  Boot your system to Safe Mode or the recovery for the Windows File Protection Console does not run.

  For this example, we will use the system critical file rundll32.exe.

  Rename or delete your c:\windows\system32\rundll32.exe.exe file so the file is now "missing."

  A critical file, is it true?  It is on the list of the file 3498 knows the Protection of Windows and SFC files, but now he isn't.

  If Windows File Protection is running, the "missing" file would be quickly and silently replaced (try to rename or delete it in normal mode and it will be quickly and quietly replaced).

  Now, with your file rundll32.exe missing, start in Normal mode and try to use something like control panel to open something like Power Options and you'll see that familiar message:

  Control Panel
  Windows cannot find 'C:\WINDOWS\system32\rundll32.exe '.  Make sure you typed the name correctly and then try again. To search for a file, click the Start button, and then click search.

  Now you have recreated a common problem with the missing file and seen the error of our own eyes.  A Microsoft Support Engineer will usually suggest running sfc/scannow for this kind of problem, but it will not work or help and you can prove it to yourself, and now you have reproduced the error.

  You follow own advice and run sfc/scannow to the end.

  The rundll32.exe is always had disappeared, right?  Did run sfc/scannow replace the missing critical system file?

  How can he be so sfc/scannow is supposed to replace the missing system files?  This is because it is not this that sfc/scannow does.

  Now you know sfc/scannow does not.  He did not replace your missing system file (don't forget to put your rundll32.exe back so you will have a).

  Now, go to c:\windows\system32\dllcache and delete or rename the file rundll32.exe from there - and it will be gone and not replaced automatically because the Windows File Protection does not seem after this record.

  Run sfc/scannow in full again.

  Replace the file rundll32.exe missing in the dllcache folder, since it handles missing files (not the system32 folder) IS the folder that sfc/scannow.

  Now you know sfc/scannow does.

  Do you need help to know too much about the corrupt system files?

  Since most people do not have a genuine XP bootable installation CD, they will not be able to develop a copy of the file that is missing from the installation CD, they have not.

  After some directions on how to replace the file when the user has no XP bootable installation CD authentic and that will be useful to all.

  If you don't know how to say "I don't know how" and I'll help you.

  You want to inform/warn the poster that SP3 is installed that running sfc/scannow will take a long time for the installation of SP3 CD?

  If you do not have a CD with the same Service Pack as your installation (most people don't), the posters are in for a rough and frustrating time.

  Of course this will help with the detachment of the Ministry of Education of the impossible to try things that don't work, but I thought I'd throw it out there for the 100th time.

• More effective than a virus - KB930494 MS update ends with true Msg that Windows cannot now work correctly

  More effective than a virus - KB930494 MS update ends with true Msg that Windows cannot now work correctly

  I started to reinstall Windows XP, after he has screwed up and I discovered that all the system snapshot
  I created backups worthless - MS removes automatically after 90 days...

  But when reinstalling Windows XP Pro MCE 2005 I managed to beat or dodge the many problems - like all the
  famous error when update .NET Framework 1.1 Service Pack 1 and many others
  Suddenly I met an error generated by Microsoft of NONRECOVERABLE type!

  While trying to install Windows, I agreed that Windows was full of bugs and security flaws and
  need a large number of fixpacks installed via Windows Update.
  Such a group of patches is called KB930494 and the full name is:

  .NET framework 1.0 Service Pack 3 SYSTEM. WEB. DLL and MSCOREE. DLL Security Update for Windows XP Media Center Edition and Windows XP Tablet PC Edition

  Windows Update gave a brief error msg that this update has failed and I have tried to run this update
  manually when it produces the following error message: (note he's telling the truth when it)
  claims that "Windows may not work correctly")

  ---
  KB930494 Setup error

  Error while updating your system.
  Windows XP has been partially updated and may not work properly.

  Ok
  ---

  So, this update of Microsoft killed my system - it sure that _ 'does not properly"more.
  Lots of things off, lots of BSOD...

  Og - of course I should have used the system restore and created a backup that I should come back...!
  I did well - but this bomb of viral type of Microsoft made sure it was not possible to create
  a valid system by restoring such a backup. Probably because half the file system matches the other.

  The worst part is - even if I try to reinstall Windows again, avoiding this Virus created by MS, how can I be sure that
  This will be the only disguised bomb nothing extraordinary provided by Windows Update as necessary security patches?

  So guys, what is the best utility backup/restore partition there?

  Rgds. E. Ben

  Use Partiton Lofic is a down load for free on the partition, you can also use Easeus Disk Copy. It is a free program with a friendly interface.

• Win 7: incrementing error backup and restore previous "Windows backup has not been implemented" and that "Windows cannot find a backup for this computer".

  * - Title original - Win 7: incrementing previous backup and restore

  Last week, I did a "backup and recovery" on my Win 7 64 bit computer, create a folder WindowsImageBackup 118 GB on an external HARD drive.

  I like incremental backup the same material on a base weekly, I tried to do the first incremental backup this morning.
  However, my "Backup and Restore" menu control configuration\systeme and securite\ tells me that "Windows backup was not put in place" and that "Windows cannot find a backup for this computer", even if the external HARD disk is attached and recognized.
  How can I set B R & to realize progressively the same backup that I did last week?  I don't want the schedule to run regularly, but will do it manually.
  Thank you
  Colin

  Hello

  Did recent changes to the computer?

  I suggest you to refer to these articles and check if they can help you.

  What backup settings should I use to maximize my disk space? : http://windows.microsoft.com/en-NZ/windows7/What-backup-settings-should-I-use-to-maximize-my-disk-space

  Backup and restore: frequently asked questions: http://windows.microsoft.com/en-us/windows7/back-up-and-restore-frequently-asked-questions

  For more information:

  Windows backup does not an incremental backup media when the Windows Media Player Network Sharing Service is enabled in Windows 7: http://support.microsoft.com/kb/981470

  I hope this helps.

• Why is - that someone would need Cisco Nexus 1000v when DvSwitch is so Kool

  Why is - that someone would need Cisco Nexus 1000v when DvSwitch is so Kool

  Or is it something that DvSwitch cannot always do that Cisco Nexus 1KV possible?

  Use of 1kV Nexus are clear enough, if you want to segregation, the advanced settings of COS, use Cisco VSG, etc. etc., you must use Nexus 1kV. But if you do not use one of these, why would you pay more money to use a Nexus 1kV, while you can use dvSwitch, giving you more or less the same basic features. After all, the 1kV has been developed using the dvSwitch framework.

• Why all numbers use symbol 'L' in the following code?

  Why all numbers use symbol 'L' in the following code?
  Thank you
  

  public static final long MILLIS_IN_YEAR = 1000L * 60L * 60L * 24L * 365L

  qkc wrote:
  Why all numbers use symbol 'L' in the following code?
  Thank you

  public static final long MILLIS_IN_YEAR = 1000L * 60L * 60L * 24L * 365L
  

  Java language rules: an L after a literal integer in Java indicates that this constant should be kept as a long (64 bit signed) instead of int (32 bits signed).

  If you have not used to that, all the numbers on the line would be treated as integers (ints) (32 bit) and multiplier with an int int translates an int even if you want to store in a long.

  Since int cannot fully represent the full product (about 31.5 billion) as it is greater than Integer.MAX_VALUE (2 billion), so if you have not used the long as operands for multiplication, you finally get an incorrect value in MILLIS_IN_YEAR because the last multiplication would cause an overrun.

  Best regards

  Robert

• Why all the bad reviews of el capitan?

  Why all this negative opinions on El Capitan?

  In General, you should always pass to the last possible system like you meet the specs for, as long as you do not have "must have" applications that do not meet specifications. The idea that the updates/updates cause problems is probably derived from discussions that see you here. ASC is like an emergency room for people to have problems, especially the sick, those who come here. Hundreds of thousands of people pass without difficulty, never here and go merrily on their way. In addition to the improved features, updates/improvements important security fixes.

• Why all the results are duplicated when searching in my bookmarks library?

  If I search for "Shell", for example, and then click on the 'name' column, most of the 'results' are duplicated. For example, "Perdido | On Shell"in the"shell"folder Parent is shown twice... same URL and al. I see that the or after the 01/02/2013 added bookmarks are NOT duplicated.

  In my case, the bookmarks ARE actually duplicated. I checked by exporting and by analyzing the HTML code.
  The whole "All bookmarks" hierarchy had somehow been copied into a random location of my favorite tree. This is why all bookmarks except most recent lie twice.
  It looked like this:

  - All Bookmarks
    + Bookmarks Toolbar
    + Bookmarks Menu
       + MY_FOLDER_A
       + MY_FOLDER_B
       - MY_FOLDER_C
         MY_NESTED_FOLDER_A
           - All Bookmarks
              .... older state fully duplicated!!!
  

  I deleted the nested copy of "All bookmarks" and it seems OK now.
  I made this copy by mistake (which I highly doubt) or a bug caused.

  Good to hear that you are not using Firefox Sync (I use it). It would have been a Prime Minister candidate for causing a problem like this. (My bad favorites have been replicated to all of the computers connected with synchronization).

  The copy of "All bookmarks" should have been made over the past months, but I couldn't determine exactly when. The copies have the same ADD_DATE and LAST_MODIFIED timestamp in the HTML file.

• Why my phone says my apple ID and password is inconsistency when it is correct

  Hi friends,

  my apple (email ID) ID and password is correct. I could get on the Web site. But why does keep saying my apple ID and password mismatch on my phone.

  and I can not install messenger or any application without it.

  Help, please.

  Make sure that the iOS software is up to date on your iPhone.

  Tap Settings > general > software update

• WHY IS THAT FIREFOX ALWAYS GEL AND DOES NOT?

  When I started using firefox on facebook it works well for a bit, and then it starts does not or not is very slow. I never had problems with firefox until these latest updates. What could be the problem. It is very frustrating and I've always liked this help so far.

  I deleted the program and reloaded it and have the same

  WHY IS THAT FIREFOX ALWAYS GEL AND DOES NOT?

  I deleted the program and reloaded it and have the same