Namespace naming standard

Similar Questions

• Index naming standards does not and unique constraints

  I found yet another question of naming standards

  I have tried to create a unique constraint as a normal index via the unique constraints and indexes in Properties of Table with the assumption that it will use the design properties of models.  This isn't.

  

  As noted in the image of the model above, my Unique constraint model is {table} _ {columns} lancement_remarques

  and my model of Index idx _ {columns} {table}.  Yet, when I try to create the Unique constraint, it creates the naming convention in names like CUSTOMER_ADDRESS__UK (2 lines of underscore?) as shown below.

  

  My assumption is that he needed a column, so I added the column and also applied the rules naming - nothing.

  

  Is my wrong assumption on these constraints being appointed through the models?  If this is not the case, what naming rules is in this context?

  The same behavior is evident when you try to create index.

  I get not all comments on my posts.  Are these bugs or just user error?

  Hello

  Thank you to report the problem, I logged a bug. You can get 'Rules of naming' works properly if you press the button 'Apply' before that.

  I get not all comments on my posts.

  I don't think that anyone (or any job) has been ignored on this forum. Depending on the complexity of the problem and our current commitment (other urgent tasks, holidays, time zone), you can get answer almost immediately or after a certain time.

  It is useful for us, if you mark your messages as replied if you get the right answer.

  Philippe

• Application of model names naming standards does not (consistantly)

  I'm trying to understand the logical steps the application of naming standards to the columns in the paintings.  I say this because sometimes it does; but most of the time it isn't.  I noticed this strange behavior last night as he tried to apply my criteria for assignment of personal names but, for the life of me, couldn't understand the logical steps to do.

  I have my own standards of naming template as shown here, which are the ones I want to apply:

  

  Now, for example, I create a new table called customary ADDRESS with the columns and data types.  For the primary key, I ADDRESS_ID , and in order to exercise, I put in the CITY, STATE and zip_code "Mandatory" (or NOT NULL).

  When you go down (or double-click) on ADDRESS_ID or zip_code to display the properties for these columns, you will notice that the 'constraint name', 'Not Null Constraint name' are all empty - as it should.

  

  When I returned to the table properties dialog box and click naming rules, another dialog box appears allowing me to select which specific naming rule, I would like to apply.  I keep all selected one, click OK.  However, when I now explore the ADDRESS_ID, CITY, STATE or ZIP CODE, there is no constraint names based on my model - at least not immediately apply (for some reason any).

  As a work around for me, if I pointed out, say, zip_code, click on the naming rules , and then click OK, then click apply and again double-click zip_code, constraint name would eventually appear.  However, it is never uniform.

  

  The zip_code with the not Null constraint name column has finally appeared.

  

  We should also not the standard naming PK never applied at all.

  Why it does not work - is this a bug?

  What I am doing wrong?

  Is there another way to do this?

  Hello

  Thanks for the report detailed the constraint not null not defined by the standard naming Wizard. I logged a bug.

  Philippe

• Naming standards level Modeler of data instead of the design

  DM 4.0.2

  Hello

  Naming standards are defined at the level of the design (in the dl_settings.xml file). Our naming standards do not apply by design, however, apply to all the designs.

  Is it possible to apply the standard naming to DM level? (without adaptation of the rules for each design)

  Joop

  Hi Joop,

  Yes, there is a checkbox for this in the Design Properties dialog box and to check DL settings will be saved in the Directory design and the types of system data directory

  Philippe

• Not finding the naming Standard SDDM 4.0 model

  Hello

  In the previous version 3.0 SDDM was under Tools-> Preferences-> DataModeler-> naming Standard

  I don't see the standard naming under preferences in SDDM4.0

  Is this something that escapes me... How to this option.

  Please let me know that we must change our naming conventions for foreign keys as our table names are big and we are trying to model rather use the abbreviation Table

  Thank you

  Zafar

  Hi zak,.

  Design level preferences are moved in the design-> settings properties dialog

• 4.0EA1 - where is the naming Standard preference DataModeler

  I was working with SD 4.0EA1 for awhile to try new things of SDDM 4.0 and noticed that it lacked the Standard naming preference.  I could go back to SDDM 3.3 and make changes to the models to try to match names created by the genius of relationship to our naming standards.  I thought he would stay in SDDM 4.0EA1 but he is still missing.  Where the models are in SDDM 4.0EA1?  I know it's their use, but how do I change them?  They are not yet implemented?  I noticed this statement in the news:

  Design level preferences are moved to design the dialog box

  How can this design dialog box?

  Marcus Bacon

  Hi Marcus,

  Click twice on the design of the tree, or right click then properties.

• Guide ODI naming standards

  Hello
  
  Is that someone with the best practices ODI / guide to the naming standards?...
  
  
  Thank you and best regards,
  Durga Katta Reddy.

  Refer
  http://www.Oracle.com/technetwork/middleware/data-integrator/overview/ODI-BestPractices-Datawarehouse-WHI-129686.PDF

• datamodeler - naming standards - technical white paper is no longer available?

  Hello
  
  I wonder, this document is no longer available?
  http://www.Oracle.com/technology/products/database/datamodeler/PDF/DataModelerNamingStandards.PDF
  
  I m trying to learn how to apply data Modeler naming standards, but I can't recover this document.
  
  On the homepage of datamodeler, on tab "Documentation".
  by clicking on "naming standards (technical white paper - pdf).
  keeps me in the 'Sample' tab
  
  Kind regards
  E.
  
  As I look at the description of the content of this document (I found this description of the content somewhere on the www), I think that I would find very useful
  
  Content of this Naming standardization reference guide Oracle SQL Developer Data Modeling
  
  Introduction... 1
  Overview. 2
  Definition of models for the keys, indexes and constraints... 3
  Applying the model to the relational model... 5
  The prefix of management... 6
  Models of names of setting for items... 7
  Define the Types of Classification of Word... 8
  Supporting the naming of models with SQL Developer Data Modeler... 8
  Review of the parameters of separator for elements in a logic model... 9
  Review of additional settings for items in a relational model. 9
  With the help of a glossary. 10
  Definition of glossaries... 10
  Using the glossary 10 Editor
  Importing glossaries... 12
  Import a CA Erwin Data Modeling glossary naming Standard. 13
  Use abbreviations... 13
  With the help of the utility of abbreviations of name... 14
  Translation of the names. 16
  Level name restrictions setting model... 18
  Using the Validation of design rules related to naming standards... 19
  Conclusion... 20
  Resources... 20

  the document is now available

  Philippe

• DataModeler v3.3.0: - model naming for substitution key creative standards

  I use DM 3.3.0.734 and in the logic model, we can now set in the properties of the entity to "create a surrogate key.
  When we engineer to the relational model, for each entity are automatically created a new column with the name model _ID {entity} in NUMERIC form (without precision) and are defined as the primary key.
  
  My questions are:
  Is possible to set a different naming standard for the creation of surrogate key?. We define id_ {link}
  Is possible to set the precision of the DIGITAL surrogate key?
  
  If we define the entity as a primary UID column, these columns are included in a unique constraint, but use for PK naming standards.
  As a result, are the following:
  Unique constraint name: entity_PK
  Name of the primary key (surrogate mother): entity_PKv1
  There is no way to set standards for naming such as "{entity} _UID" for unique or even, constraints "{entity} _SK ' for the name of the surrogate primary key?
  
  Can anyone help with some of these topics?
  Kind regards
  Ariel.

  Hello Ariel,.

  Standard model of naming for creating surrogate keys

  I logged enhancement for this request.
  How to change the names of these bad (will change one by one is not an option):
  (1) if the keys unique "transformed" are the only ones you have in the relational model, then simply can apply naming standards
  (2) you can write the transformation script to do it for you
  (3) you can use the new feature - search, export to excel file, change the names here (using find/replace will be faster) and return the changed data back to the relational model
  Here is the description for this:
  https://Apex.Oracle.com/pls/Apex/f?p=44785:24:13179871410726:no:24:P24_CONTENT_ID, P24_PREV_PAGE:6621, 16
  http://www.thatjeffsmith.com/archive/2012/11/SQL-Developer-Data-Modeler-v3-3-early-adopter-search/
  http://www.thatjeffsmith.com/archive/2012/11/SQL-Developer-Data-Modeler-v3-3-early-adopter-collaborative-design-via-Excel/

  You must find _PK, then filter result on Index and you can export the result using the report feature (in XLS or XLSX format). You can create the template and include only the table and the (index) name as properties to include in the report.

  Kind regards
  Philippe

• Resolve namespace conflicts

  I have a column in one of my paintings with an index, whose name is, say TABLE_IDX1v1. TABLE_IDX1v1 is not the name, I gave, it was originally TABLE_IDX1, but I think the Data Modeler think that there is already a name index, so it adds the v1, but I can't find it anywhere. Is there a way to search all indexes through a relational model to determine where the conflict?

  Hello

  I fear that you have reached a bug (21486154), we have identified recently (since this forum message: Datamodeler generates a letter from version in index Version 4.1.1.888 )

  The problem occurs if the Index model includes a component {seq nr} (but no {} or {column abbr} component column).

  If the Table has a primary key, and then after the table is modified using the properties of the table editor, the first clue ends with v1 or v2, v3,... suffix.  (Other than the first index are not affected.)

  Until this bug is fixed, the solution would be to delete or change the pattern of the Index (and explicitly set the name of the new index that you create).

  (The model Index can be changed by selecting the properties of the node browser for your design, in the settings > naming Standard > page templates in the design properties dialog box.)

  Alternatively, you could go back to use an older version 4.0 of the Data Modeler.

  (Version 4.0.3 can always be downloaded from http://www.oracle.com/technetwork/developer-tools/datamodeler/downloads/dm-downloads-403-2528264.html .)

  David

• How to set standard models

  I am currently working with oracle sddm 4.0.0.833 and I would like to change the settings for objects like ID: emp_pk instead of employee_pk.

  In book of Sue Harper 2.1 sqldeveloper, there is a menu of standard naming. I can't find it in my version!

  JM

  Hello

  First find the node in the browser for your Design (this is the node above "Logic model") and then display the Properties dialog box.

  In the left panel, expand the parameters node.  Then expand the node for naming Standard, and you can select the models node to view model options.

  David

• Group of port and the naming convention for vLAN

  What is the naming convention better for groups of ports on vSwitches?  This naming convention should match how we name them VLAN on the physical switches and how important is that?

  Hi VMinator,

  To answer your question, he has not agreed to 'standard' for names of portgroup.  That's all what you're comfortable with the support and what works for you and your organization.  A bit like server names; Some companies are going hardcore with the naming conventions and others their name after the characters in science fiction or world of warcraft bosses

  Forensic science more you pack in a naming of the control standard more you have (i.e. for scripts, health check, etc. see below).  Also, if the name itself answers questions on his own and allows you to save a phone call that is priceless.  For example - the guys says unix... "Uh which network to choose for my new virtual machine.  My IP is blah blah blah. "Well, with right portgroup name, this question would have answered itself... and maybe even recorded some interruptions of service in other cases by the simple fact of being clear and effective in the communication of how this virtual device should work: purely expressed through an appropriate naming convention.

  Here's another one.  My last concert, we had thousands of virtual machines that had to move data centers and when they landed, they needed to change the IPs and start using 3 vNIC (instead of 1) on each virtual machine.  Each vNIC with a different subnet mask.  All support should be conducted by a team of outsourced with minimum experience of VMware.  The only way to support something like this and be effective is PowerCLI.  With just invited the naming convention only, you can perform various tasks such as query the virtual computer and check its settings of portgroup compared to its actual IP information in the operating system, initiate a ping from .NET to the virtual machine, if there is any questions Act automatically.  Some actions that will have to be performed include, for example, change the portgroup or mask on a set of clients;  Or questioning guests and glean information network (CDP, vSwitch, portgroup of information etc.) and compare observed network vs network expected enumerated in the PG naming convention. etc etc.  The list of actions that you can take are limited only by your creativity.  The naming standards give you effective power both in manual and automatic efforts.

  Still, notice of one man, but every site I care and feeding generally ends with a PG standard similar to what I first described above in my previous post.  Don't forget my example naming convention is Basic.  There are many other attributes that you can add (i.e. in vCloud deployments, in addition to the info network, you can choose to identify various features specific to vCloud org-networks, etc.).

  TBH just most of the companies have appointed VM-network exchanges (ok not bad) or some random shortname which doesn't help troubleshooting.  They are fairly easy to fix and also change over time, if necessary.  You can easily drag and drop a set of virtual machines (although I don't personally do this way) in the new port group (via the page of networking to CTRL + SHIFT + N) or PowerCLI it (Yes!  way to go).  Of course, always the ping tests before and after the change.  There are a lot of scripts out there (or ask master lucd post in PowerCLI VMTN forums).  If this is net-news, then you are ahead of the game and will have a standard to follow, whatever it is.

  Best of luck and have fun!

• Naming of the ESX hosts with the underscore. Best practices?

  I was curious as to what that the general eager to name the ESX hosts with underscores "_". I found an old post in 2006 related to it:

  http://communities.vmware.com/thread/64885

  In the thread, it is usually frowend against because she not compling with DNS internet naming standards. The underscore character is not recognized by the Web servers.

  He has been wondering if there would be no advantage to include similar underscore characters with no routable ip subnets, 192.168.x, 10, etc...

  If you have designed it correctly you already have your hosts on a subnet that is not routable, so you would get no real benefit.

  Beyond this thought experiment, there are problems with your esx host with ESX, vSphere, vCenter naming universe underscores?

  Just an info

  All my guests have underscore in them. I had to replace all of them with a dashboard because ESX 4.1 will not accept underscore after upgrade to the console.

• Features: SE vs Standard One

  Hello
  
  After browsing the site for any purpose that I found a chart that shows the features available for each version and could find that (outside the limits of socket) the only difference between these 2 im naming (Standard vs One edition) versions is RAC and automatic management of the workload is available on the self.
  
  Is there a way to check the exact list of features lacking between different editions? It's 11 GR 2
  
  for example: a database IS has PART of the workflow capability, as it is capable of being the target of a replication architecture, but has no capture redo. The rest is EE.
  
  Thanks in advance,
  NK

  See if that helps,
  http://docs.Oracle.com/CD/B19306_01/license.102/b14199/editions.htm#BABJICBB

  Aman...

• Data Modeler - Naming Conventions

  I was using Oracle Designer for several year.
  This product could make you crazy because sometimes, but the resistance was in my opinion the datamodelling part.
  He saved a lot of time because you kept stuck to the logic model generated your relational model and had all the scripts meets all naming conventions you need.
  In Data Modeler I really miss the naming conventions and cannot understand certain parts, sometimes that someone here can help me if I oversaw something or it is simply not implemented.
  
  Such naming conventions:
  
  We work with surrogate keys.
  Two tables well known - employees (abbreviation PMC), departments (DEP abbreviation)
  They have a relationship 1: n a Department has many employees
  
  In the designer, I would define the EMPLOYEE entity, would fix the abbreviation table, attributes, and the primary key.
  The same Department. I would design it WITHOUT any column of the foreign key constraint.
  Then I would create a relationship between the two tables.
  Final step is to generate the relational model.
  
  (a) Designer automatically adds ID as the key substitution on all tables (you can set it up, it was based on a domain)
  (b) it automatically adds the abbreviation of table as prefix on each column (although here, it is configurable)
  (c) it automatically adds the a foreign key column in the child table with the prefix of the main table (Te EMP_DEP_ID or DEP_ID if you prefer not to prefix each column... what I do)
  
  It was really easy to get your scripts.
  
  I don't understand things in Data Modeler:
  
  In a logic model you should design entities, attributes and relationships and not waste his time with FK-columns.
  Y at - it no support for surrogate keys? I don't want to add an ID manually with all tables.
  In Data Modeler as a COLUMN (!) additional is added to each foreign key relationship, I could live with that, but there is no way of knowing
  Data Modeler to precede it automatically. The name can just be changed in the relational view later.
  
  P. S.
  Surrogate keys... There are a few advantages and disadvantages for/against this there. I have seen a lot of Oracle projects and in all but one, I've always had a surrogate key column. It really makes life
  easier. In the only substitution key project, we started adding surrogate keys after a certain time...

  Hey Manfred,

  Even though with 'Apply naming Standard' I can just change the name of the foreign key, unique key, check the constraint etc but not the foreign key column.

  What version of Data Modeler using you - this feature is available in the latest version released - build 584 - http://www.oracle.com/technology/products/database/datamodeler/index.html

  Philippe