Need settings for base color for the Web (graphic) design

Similar Questions

• Need advice for the new graphics card

  I have a desktop HP Pavilion a6610t with HP w1907 monitors. Windows 7 32 bit.  I want to upgrade to a graphics card that supports two monitors.  Games isn't a factor, but I'd like a card that does not become the neck of the bottle when you surf or work remotely.  I have a PCIe - x 16 available slot.  My price range is around us $100.

  What should I look for another as the PCIe - x 16 and the ability to support two monitors when you shop for a graphics card?  I think the AMD Radeon HD 6570 is a good starting point.  What do you think?

  Any information will be appreciated.

  Here are the specifications and the configurable option for your desktop HP Pavilion a6610t CTO. According to specifications, your system came from the factory with a 250 watt power supply. Most retail graphics cards require a power supply minimum system assessment of 300 watts or greater. The Radeon HD 6570 you noted requires a 400 watt or a bigger power supply. The CX500, CX600 Corsair are highly recommended, are favorites of the forum and are known to adapt to most cases of HP. For useful information on the selection of a graphics card that fits your computer and meets your needs, read Guide of Big_Dave of a discrete video card selection .

  Frank

• I need to create combinations of text and images for the web. How to do this in elements or do I need Photoshop for this feature?

  I need to create combinations of text and images for the web. How to do this in elements or do I need Photoshop for this feature?  Please advise!

  slynn5236 wrote:

  I need to create combinations of text and images for the web. How to do this in elements or do I need Photoshop for this feature?  Please advise!

  You can do in PSE.

  1. Do the math to see how much space you'll need on your canvas to the image and text.
  2. Navigate to the file queue > new.blank. Enter the width & height, background color, resolution 72 px / in. It is your canvas, and in the layers palette will be the background layer.
  3. Copy and paste the image. It turns on a separate layer
  4. Activate the tool move, position the image and resize if necessary
  5. Activate the text tool, and then type your text. It will be on a separate so layer
  6. Position the text.
  7. Flatten layers and go to file > save for web. I'm usually on the long side about 800 px. Don't forget to check "constrain proportions". Adjust the quality slider to suit. You will probably want the type of JPEG file for web work.

• What are the recommended settings for the export of photos for the web?

  I am a photographer, if the images would be used for my blog... and still need of decent looks.
  They are also the images that I approach clients, again, they need for decent, but would be the right size for the web.
  I played a bit, and when we maintain quality"to 100%, but the setting at 72 dpi, the image remains the same size at 300 dpi.
  So I got the quality up to 50%, but even slight vignetting seemed absolutely horrible. (Highly visible sections of different colors.)
  So now I'm stuck.
  72 dpi and 300 dpi made no difference in size (cannot explain this one.)
  100% quality seemed fine but was too big for the web.
  50% quality was mediocre at best.
  Any suggestions? What is the standard practice?
  Thanks in advance.

  I would use a quality of 70-80 and also resize the image under 'Image size' for example, you pick a long edge of (for example) 1200 pixels.

  The ppi (dpi not) makes absolutely no difference, it's completely out of words and useless in this situation, as you found it. Just ignore it.

• What is the disadvantage of savings WITHOUT color profile for the web?

  I have discussed this issue in another thread and a clear argument against saving jpg files * without * a color profile must be performed.

  I'm very annoyed with how much more red and saturated, all my jpg files appear in IE (which does not read the sRGB embedded profile) compared to FF (which is the case).

  I tried to save the image even with the inclusion of unchecked color profile, and of course, IE and FF are showing the same image.

  It seems to me that including color profiles with jpg are just an invitation for different browsers interpret the image differently.

  Why not just save them all, WITHOUT color profiles?

  The downside to this, what exactly?

  mjyeager wrote:

  Emil, please do not confuse what follows for stubbornness...

  No worries, I never had such thoughts

  mjyeager wrote:

  ... IE does not read color profiles. The fact of FF. ERGO, in situations where a color profile is involved, the JPG will be different in each browser.

  True, without color managed programs and management the colors may not display an image in the same way. Except in the situation where the color profile describing the color of the image or the color values of an image without a color profile, by an extraordinary chance match the display capabilities of color of the device used by the program managed without colors.

  One of the problems that the addresses of color management is that all monitors will display the same color differently. Color management will make colors appear the same or as close as possible.

  A color managed program will send the RGB values of the color of the video card corrected to compensate for the differences between how your monitor displays color values and how they are perceived.

  For example, to help my Monitor wide gamut, when I create an image in Photoshop, with a red color pure R = 255, G = 0 and B = 0 and then do a screen capture, I can check how Photoshop sends these values to the video card. The result is R = 222, G = 65, B = 0 when I'm simulating an ideal sRGB display. So I can see how my colors appear on the screens of ideal sRGB. However, in reality, it is very likely to have a monitor displaying space sRGB color ideal without a color management, so to complete the color management chain, the other monitors that display my image must also have the appropriate color management to compensate for the differences in screen and display correctly RGB numbers representing the color that I see on my screen.

  mjyeager wrote:

  ... However, if the JPG has no color profile, image shows exactly the same way in both browsers...

  Who will most likely be a bad smell, which means not repoducing the expected color which is always the case with the browsers managed without colors.

  mjyeager wrote:

  ... Now, let's say this image - which looks the same in both browsers - is too hot. I can load it in Photoshop, change its hue and re-save is more what I'm looking for. The resulting image will then out - in the two browsers identically - the way I want to...

  Yes, the image will be the same in both browsers on your and any other monitor but the colors that you create (edit) will examine the way which only see you them on your monitor.

  mjyeager wrote:

  ... Now, what I think you are trying to do, is that I have no control on what are the conditions of viewing on the OTHER end (i.e., visitors to the site). They could range wide monitors, cheaper monitors, running MAC or PC, etc...

  I don't remember talking about this earlier, but yes, it's true.

  mjyeager wrote:

  ... It's true. I have no control over that. However, how including the color profile sRGB with the JPG would give me more control over these things I would not include? Unless you had to tell me that browsers arbitrarily apply a random color profile when in the absence of one, I am simply not understand how including the color with the JPG profile performs one another act that ensure that the picture is completely different in FF it does in Internet Explorer.

  You who are absolutely wrong. Color management is not to have any control over how other devices are setup, calibrated, etc.. As I said earlier make sure you communicate the colors scheduled correctly or as close as possible, as long as you and the destination use the proper color management. This means that the embedded profile FF will display correctly the planned colors while IE will not. If you do not include a color profile with your image both FF and IE will not display correctly the planned colors but they will be equal in that.

  mjyeager wrote:

  ... I understand the need for color profiles to print. In fact, my printer insists on the details when it comes to color profiles.

  But for the web? I'm still not understand where the downside is to omit the color profile. It's not like the browsers get CONFUSED when it is not included. Or that the colors will start randomly from refreshing one page to another.

  I am really trying to understand what you are saying here, but still haven't.

  In addition to what Marian said:

  If you create the colors using an sRGB display ideal (given the color management on your system works properly, it can be simulated by color of Photoshop on your range management widescreen when you assign the profile sRGB color to the image) and then on any ideal sRGB display, it will look the same you see on your screen regardless if it's with or without embedded sRGB color profile. However, in reality, it is unlikely to have a monitor, sRGB, display of the ideal space of sRGB color without color management. Now what does this mean in practice? Assume that users interested in, using the IE managed without colors on a PC with the Windows default color management. In other words, color management programs are told by the system monitor displays the ideal sRGB space, which is very likely to be the truth. Then users with this configuration with sRGB monitors will not see a difference between IE and FF when viewing your image with or without sRGB profile, the colors are not very likely to be the same that you see on the screen, but with the difference that is more likely to be accepted depending on how close to the ideal color space sRGB these monitors are. If some of these users with this configuration have wide range monitors, then the image will always be the same with or without sRGB profile, but with a very unacceptable difference of how you see it on your space to sRGB sumulated - strongly supersaturated.

  For users that have the color correctly managed systems, when the image is saved with a sRGB profile, it appears color managed programs such as FF the same or as close as possible to the way in which you can see on your monitor. Programs run without colors the case remains the same as that described above.

  A little history on how standard sRGB was created. It is a standard, including more things, but above all defining an abstract color space. It was created sometime after that the market was already flooded with computer monitors, and the creation of ideal sRGB color space was based on an average PC monitor display capabilities over time. After that the manufacturers used this standard sRGB as a target to create monitors.

  UN-color of programs run on PC have been created and tested using sRGB monitors so that they can't be considered reliable for showing intended to display colors if the images they use have been created using an sRGB they will be in the stadium of this range of sRGB.

• Color changes during the recording of the PSD to JPEG (safe for the web) in PS CS5 working in sRGB

  As I secured it for the web a PSD file, jpeg version of the same file changes slightly color - I opened the two files in PS CS5 to compare.

  File initially processed in Lightroom 6 and converted to sRGB for export.

  I worked in the sRGB color space in Photoshop.

  When exporting I secured for the web. I tried both options checked including the color profile and convert to sRGB.

  I tried to save to the web as a PNG and color remained the same, she only moves for JPEG files.

  You can't really see the difference in color with a naked eye, but be specific. I don't understand why he would change when I work in the color space is sRBG. Please help this is driving me crazy!

  JPEG compression can change the values, even quite spectacular on single pixel level. You have the selector of color set to "sample point"?

• Best way to prepare images ProPhoto RGB for the Web?

  My working to Edit my RAW files color space is ProPhoto RGB. My master files are saved as ProPhoto RGB 16 bit layered PSD files. I am aware of the many ways to prepare my images for the Web, but it is better to properly view my work on a web site?

  
  

  «Save for Web...» "of Photoshop is easy, but it's also good work like resize manually,"Convert to Profile"(sRGB), then" save under... ". "an 8-bit JPEG? I noticed "Save for Web...» "its color space designated as"Untagged RGB", while the manual method is"sRGB"will create a file w. Any difference? Thank you.
  

  Were you not satisfied by the answers you got this question on Luminous Landscape forum? I will repost mine here:

  ---

  You should always incorporate the profile. With the notable exception of Internet Explorer (which seems to be a lost cause), most browsers now manage well of color management. At least Safari and Firefox both do.

  Save for Web in Photoshop always band profile with default settings, you will need to check the "embed color profile". This setting sticks. Personally, I think it's well past time to change this default, but that's it.

  While you're there, check "Convert to sRGB" and set to "use the embedded profile. This shows you the image with full color management (using the monitor profile to display). Here still SFW uses an obsolete default from the old days, when browsers were not color management.

  If you use a range wide screen a few special considerations come in and in Firefox, a manual adjustment has be activated (color management mode 1) *.

  Regarding resizing, I have no particular opinion. SFW seems to do well. But you should do a final sharpening after resizing, that needs to be done in Photoshop anyway, so he can probably handle resizing too. Construction while some actions and you are ready.

  Firefox users should enable this setting in all cases, regardless of monitor they use. What it does is assign sRGB to any untagged material. This allows full color management chain, instead of just go directly to the screen unmanaged. IOW, even color management on hardware untagged, so long as it is created in sRGB with sRGB numbers.

• How can I change the base color in the work of Recolor settings?

  How can I change the base color in the work of Recolor settings? I know that this seems a silly thing but I really need to figure this point and I have read and went through the manual and the forum for help, without result. Help, please.

  Click the color you want in the "new color" column. Then click the base color next to the list of color harmonies, which will change then, but the harmonies of color will depend on your desired color.

• Best settings for the analysis of revenues

  I just bought a HP Officejet 6600 A-I-O. I was looking for a device scan my boxes of documents, so I can unclutter my home office. I would also like to analyze the revenue. I considered the famous 'neat Scanner", but I hesitated to the price tag of $400.

  My question: what are the best settings for the HP scanning application when I'm scanning received? What is the difference between PDF and PDF searchable? IsTIFF a better choice than PDF? Use "Generalist" or something else? Recipes do not need large files high resolution, of course.

  Can someone point me to a guide that explains the different parameters available with the HP Scan application, please. Thank you!

  Hi Caesar3,

  In a regular PDF document, the text looks more like a picture of the text.  We can see it, but the file does not contain the words.

  In an indexed PDF, text is stored as text, so it can be searched.

  http://acrobatusers.com/tutorials/how-to-create-a-searchable-PDF-file

  When you scan receipts, 200 or 300 dpi should be fine.  If you plan to print the stored version receive 300 dpi would work well.

  I recommend PDF more TIFF.  TIFF files can store pages or multiple images in a single file, but access to additional pages is a bit awkward.  Generally, the file size is much smaller with PDF or TIFF.

  The site http://www.scantips.com/ is a good resource.  This is a Web site not HP, but it does not scan HP.

• Guard application launch at the start of the appliance, also need advice for the implementation of network methods

  Hi all

  I'm new to the development of Blackberry and I'm writing a relatively simple application to run on 7.1.

  So far the development was interesting, I managed to create my user interface using resources online (mainly this forum), but today I tried to implement some of the network classes that I need and now I just met constant problems.

  I use Eclipse SDK 3.7.2 (the one that comes with the plugin RIM)

  First question:

  I'm not sure what I changed, but today I noticed that whenever I start the Simulator (by sim 9360) my application is started during the initial startup process. I don't think he did this before, but to be honest, I wasn't paying much attention. I think it starts at the start of the device is because I put a breakpoint in the constructor for my class from the main screen, which is hit before the Simulator happens even to the point where it is ready for user interaction. In addition, once it is ready, if I press the BB button, I see my registered application.

  I don't have it set to automatic start in .xml descriptior enforcement.

  I started this application on the HelloBlackBerry sample, here is my main method for the entry of the application:

  public static void main( String[] args ) {
          appSettings = AppSettings.fetch();
          // Create a new instance of the application and make the currently
          // running thread the application's event dispatch thread.
          HelloBlackBerry theApp = new HelloBlackBerry();
          theApp.enterEventDispatcher();
          //openConnection();
  
      }
  
  
  

  As far as I know, this is the only entry point for the application.

  More code

      public HelloBlackBerry() {
          // Push a screen onto the UI stack for rendering.
          mainScreen = new ScreenHelloBlackBerry();
          pushScreen( mainScreen );
      }
  

  Here is the method of. my class AppSettings fetch()

      // Retrieves a copy of the effective properties set from storage.
      public static AppSettings fetch()
      {
          AppSettings savedSettings = (AppSettings) _store.getContents();
          return new AppSettings(savedSettings);
      }
  

  Some of this code that I wrote myself, the persistence store cause the launch of my car?

  I tried to reset the Simulator to the factory settings, no change.

  All applications initialized during the startup of the device and then closed shortly after?

  Part 2: Need advice for the implementation of functions of network in the application

  I need to implement some methods that will retrieve data from a web service, and I also need to send data to this service. What I've read, the ConnectionFactory is the way to go. I want my application to make a request when the application is open and can check on a set interval. I didn't know exactly how to go about adding another thread for networking, I understand that network connections should not be created on the thread main event, so I tried to do this:

  The constructor of my class that implements screen (ScreenHelloBlackBerry), I use the following to create a modal dialog box to prompt the user for a username, I also try networking wire in the same segment of spawning:

          public ScreenHelloBlackBerry(){...initialize fields and managers, add it all together...then near the end
  
  //This will open the confirm dialog when the application is launched
          UiApplication.getUiApplication().invokeLater(new Runnable() {
                public void run() {
                    openConfirmDialog();
                  //start connection - Possibly broken
                    ConnectionThread ct = new ConnectionThread();
                    ct.start();
                }
          });
  

  I don't know if it's somehow OK to do, but it seems to work for what I need. I want a user who launches the application at the prompt, and if a user switch applications, when they come back they wondered again (unless they close the app and reopen it).

  Here is my ConnectionThread:

  public class ConnectionThread extends Thread
  {
  
      public void run()
      {
  
            ConnectionFactory connFact = new ConnectionFactory();
            ConnectionDescriptor connDesc;
            connDesc = connFact.getConnection("http://www.google.com");
            if (connDesc != null)
            {
                HttpConnection httpConn;
                httpConn = (HttpConnection)connDesc.getConnection();
                try
                {
                    final int iResponseCode = httpConn.getResponseCode();
                    UiApplication.getUiApplication().invokeLater(new Runnable()
                    {
                        public void run()
                        {
                            Dialog.alert("Response code: " +
                                          Integer.toString(iResponseCode));
  
                        }
                     });
                    httpConn.close();
  
                 }
                 catch (IOException e)
                 {
                   System.err.println("Caught IOException: "
                        + e.getMessage());
                 }
            }
      }
  }
  

  At the moment it has basically unmodified code from a sample that I found, I'll be retooling to meet my needs whenever I can make it work. I HAD this work to the point where, after the closed user confirm this dialog, a few moments later a an alert dialog appears with the 302 response code. I don't know what changed, but now it doesn't work at all, and if I try to scroll with the debugger, I can't past the httpCon.getResponseCode (). I've seen some mistakes earlier on "no record of service was set up", and I also had once a timeout exception.

  I'm sure I'm doing this wrong, but at the same time as I said WAS working, and now it is not. If someone has done this far, thank you very much for your time and advice are much appreciated.

  Also, should I try to start the thread of the network of the UIApplication class instead of the screen? There is currently very little happening in the class that extends UIApplication, do I spend most of my business logic out of the class of the screen and in the UIApplication class?

  Thanks in advance!

  Hi all

  Just to conclude this topic for those who are interested, I found an excellent guide to the implementation of networks in applications of BB, click here for a link.

  About my application being started at the start of the simulator of the device, I found that on a device real this behavior is not complied with, and in addition, the behaviour seems to have stopped after uninstallation and reinstallation of my Simulator.

  See you soon,.

• Best app for the batch processing of photos for the web?

  I would like to know what is the best application for batch processing photos for the web quickly and easily. I'm a web editor and often need to resize, compress, or crop several photos and would like a quick way to configure the basic parameters and processes for example 20 pictures at once. Basically, I'm looking for something with the ability to FastStone Photo Resizer (I'm on a Mac and cannot use FastStone). I remember an once suggested graphic designer LightRoom - would that be a good idea or Adobe has something else? Or maybe not Adobe at all?

  PhotoShop seems heavy for this purpose: it is ideal to make the photo woth that much at the time, but less large to do less with many pictures at once. I know that I can implement some sort of macro-thingie, but I would like to be able to quickly change settings such as the percentage of compression or the width in pixels.

  I don't need a lot of editing tools, mostly just work in pixels, resizing, compression or cropping and save for the web in .jpg and .png - and Mac.

  I hope someone here can guide me in the right direction.

  Hi eval

  I think the best thing for you is Adobe photoshop elements, cover in simple not expensive and all what you want

  Photo Editor software & tools | Adobe Photoshop Elements 14

  concerning

• Extract photos from photoshop for the web

  Hi all

  I posted the question here (bottom) - but couldn't use any assitance DW people also - since this is where I'll build the page...

  Need help newbie extract

  Once you give up any info from the PS file you want not carried over, as the background image, there is no need to flatten the PSD in a tiff image...

  1. in Photoshop, select an area with the marquee tool.

  2. press Ctrl + Shift + C "Copy all layers" in this selection.

  3. press Ctrl + N to create a new document with the same pixel as the selection size (size should be auto based on selection)

  4. press Ctrl + P to paste the image into the new document

  5. press Ctrl + Shift + Alt + S for save for Web (important for loading time optimize your images for the web)

  6. choose jpg for photos of high quality, .gif for 'simple work with transparency' or PNG-24 for "work/high quality pictures with transparency."

  7. press on the 4th tab and change the quality settings until they are as low as possible while still looking 'good' for you

  8. click on the window with the "right the lowest setting.

  9. record in your local site folder (if you do not in DW, do step 1 below first)

  1. open DW and define a Site: http://tv.adobe.com/watch/learn-dreamweaver-cs5/gs01-defining-a-new-site/

  2A. You can then go to insert > Image > Image to place the image where the mouse cursor is

  2B. otherwise, you can drag the image in the files window in page

  I give you the "long" way around with the images. Photoshop can produce HTML, or all your domains into slices at a time with a few clicks. I prefer a little more control over my images and the html PS product should never be used for actual websites (models may be fast, but not for the real thing). It's horribly inflexible and when you start adding real content it will cause more problems than it solves.

• Several pages for the web?

  Hello. I am very new to InDesign, and I'm using CS5. I'm working on a flyer for an upcoming event. I do a page of printing, legal size and have just completed, using Kuler colors in CMYK mode, and everything seems good.

  I also wanted to do a separate document, so I put it on a web page.

  I did a file... New... document, intended for the web, it size in 1024 x 768 and used Kuler colors in RGB. When I was building the document, needed me more space than just a page. So I added a page to fit all the info, photos, etc., and I ended up with two full pages of my document. Here's what I don't understand...

  I do not how to put the document 2 page on my web page. It doesn't look like two separate pages like that now? Should I make a long page so that I can scrool just down the document as on an ordinary web page? I checked the size of my "legal book" size paper by changing the ruler from inches to pixels guides and came to 610 wide x 1010 long. Do I just do the size of my document online?

  Thanks for the help.

  Just use the page tool to extend your first page down and put your additional info on the bottom.

  Here's the thing, however, that "for the web" is not intended to do, it's for publications that are... heck who knows what it's for!  The normal method is just to export your first print version of smaller file size and post in downloadable PDF format.  Or if you want a web page uses another tool, not Indesign.  I would like to start by talking to the person who organizes or assembles the web page you're going to be showing on and asking them what they would recommend in your case.

• Best video for the Web?

  I created a site offering artists around my city. The most important thing is the videos and that's what I have a problem with. Can you help me?

  I started with the flv files swf turned and who was allowed. The problem was he wouldn't play on IPAD and other devices.

  So, I read online that a mov or mp4 file was good. Today, I received so many responses from those who said that the video is so slow that they have not even watch.

  I tried to increase my size to a size close to youtube, so it was more visible then my first posts.

  The site is

  www.adamsstreetsessions.com

  Thanks in advance

  . FLV is currently the best format of video container for the Web...

  As a rescue use swfobject for Flash detection and provide a .mov as ALT content file

  Link to swfobject:

  http://code.Google.com/p/SWFObject/

  Sample .flv video that plays on the iPhone:

  http://www.cidigitalmedia.com/tutorials/Qt/play_qt.html

  relief is .mov file. View the source code to see how it works.

  A potential problem of slow download .mov files is if the moov atom is at the end of the file rather than the beginning... Hey, I don't do this kind of things, I just tell you about it. The download is not slow, it's just that the entire file has download before he plays. If the moov atom is at the end of the file, the full .mov file must be downloaded before the video starts to play. It will be not progressive download as an .flv file (another reason why .flv is the video container of choice).

  You can restructure the .mov files are needed by using QuickTime Pro, and save as.

  Google to know the exact details or check here:

  https://www.ezs3.com/members/login.cfm?hpage=Checking_Metadata_or_Moov_Atom_Location.cfm

  If the video bitrate and/or the size is a problem, investigate it to an old post:

  Video bitrate

  One of the principle of goal setting is to "begin with the end in mind". In this case, it will be very difficult to give good recommendations because the end is not defined. So I'll just make a few assumptions and you can correct me if necessary.
  First, I'll assume that you convert Flash, whether you want to broadcast this video on the Internet. If that's true, then going to make some assumptions about your potential viewers Internet connection download speeds. Let's just say that most have at least a 1.5 MB connection or faster.
  OK, that would mean that a video bitrate of half that generally provide a video download that is not interupped by the buffering (most of the time anyway). So assuming a video bitrate of 750 kbps, what would be the optimal display size?
  Before decide us, here's a little info on the bitrate. To read more high quality, the bitrate of the video is directly related to the size of the screen. In other words, more display, incoming data more are needed to correctly display the video. Think of bitrate in terms of a can of paint. If you have 1 quart of paint, you might be able to do a very nice job on an area of 32 X 24 feet. But if you try to stretch the same amount of paint on a surface area of 64 X 48 feet, the coverage is not as good and you get mediocre results.
  Similarly, a video display to 640 X 480 pixels will require 4 times the baud rate as a video displayed at 320 X 240 pixels to produce the same quality. Thus, for example, a video with a speed of 100 kbps, 160 X 120 displayed will produce the same quality results as a video with a bitrate of 1600 kb/s is displayed in 640 X 480.
  So, to sum it all, 750 Kbps, even up to 1000 kbps video rates can usually get delivered high-speed Internet on most connections. Higher rates may work for connections very fast but will cause problems for viewers with slower connections. Video display size has a direct impact on the final quality. In the range of 750 to 1000 Kbps, display size should be maintained around 450 or 500 width max (and whatever the height proportions claims). Yes it can be displayed larger, but the quality will suffer.
  Sounds like the audio settings are fine, especially for delivery on the Internet.
  Regarding the framerate, maintain the framerate video original raw for best results. Therefore, if the clip was shot at 24 frames per second, let him.
  In regards to video converters, you have the Flash 8 Video Converter? It works very well for the video to be delivered over the Internet. Don't forget, you're taking a Cadillac of video (h.264 HD) version and cram into a Chevy body so he can work on the Internet.

  Best wishes

  Adninjastrator

• Prep file InDesign for the web.

  PSCS5, Mac OS 10.6.4

  I need to prepare a book cover created in InDesign display with online sellers (Angus & Roberton, Austraila, and Amazon for beginners). My first attempt and prepare the InD file for the web has failed. No file is available from each provider. Can you help me?

  The InD file is 8 "x 8", contains 2 images, 2 vectors of I and PS text. " PS files are set at 350 dpi (by record the print service bureau). The book is intended for the wet press 4 colours. The first set of wet proofs are superb, so I know I'm on the right track with color, related, etc. images management.

  My first approach when I tried it prepare for the web was to export the InD file in a JPEG file, open it in PS and save it as a .psd file before making any changes. After you convert the color in RGB, I resize to 3 "x 3" at 72 dpi, then saved as a JPEG file with a new name. "  I think that the resizing and resolutoion is where I was wrong. But I am at a loss for the right way forward and what parameters to use for the image size and resolution.

  What is the procedure I should I have followed to prepare the cover over a picture for the web? Here is the image exported in JPEG format at 150 dpi.

  Thanks in advance.

  Toni

  

  Toni...

  I'm doing print and web and often take a page ID to an image.

  What I do...

  1. Export Indesign to PDF. (Use any standard PDF job option you have, same PDFX1a)
  2. Drag the PDF Photoshop > open 300 PPI and no matter what the dimensions are already present.
  3. If necessary, crop and flatten the image in Photoshop. (PDFx1a will be cropped and flattening will offset any transparency in the PDF file.)
  4. In Photoshop > file > save for Web > dimensions of the input image I need in the box dialog SFW
  5. Click Save.

  What's been sent by others is correct. There is no PPP/DPI for the web. The only thing that matters is the width and height. If you want you can test to show you. Create 2 images - one to 100 x 100 pixels and 300ppi and the other to 100 x 100 pixels and 72 dpi. Save the two images for the web, and then open the pictures stored in a browser... they are the same size and look identical.

  Export to PDF from ID, you get a crisp, clean the PDF.

  By dragging the PDF to PS, you get a purified PS image. If you export a jpg of ID and then save a jpg of PS that you create artifacts due to the re-registration of a compressed format (jpg).

  Using save for Web to create the final image all the superfluous image data are robbed and you get a basic, clean and crisp image to the size entry in the SFW.

  There are other roads, you can take, but for me this five-step process gives the best results in all cases.