NetBios Over VPN

Similar Questions

• NetBios over VPN with a ROUTER normal not ASA?

  Hello

  I was wondering if it was possible to see my home network when I am connected via a VPN tunnel?

  I guess I have to open some ports 136 / 137 or?

  Any help is welcome.

  Before I post this I'm looking for NETBIOS VPN in the search bar, but I can only find information with certain products of the SAA.

  Best regards

  Didier.

  Didier,

  If you use an IPsec VPN connection, no broadcast/multicast traffic would pass through the tunnel (NetBIOS).

  I think that if you use another type of VPN PPTP or L2TP connection, you might be able to pass NetBIOS traffic through the tunnel very well.

  Another option is that users can use an LMHOSTS file as a work-around. More information can be found athttp://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/windows2000serv/reskit/cnet/cnfd_lmh_qxqq.mspx?mfr=true

  It will be useful.

  Federico.

• After a virus, I am unable to connect to the internet. Event log messages: the NetBios over TCP/IP service failed to start due to the following error...

  original title: NETBios TCPIP of missing in Device Manager

  I recently had to run two antivirus programs on an infected computer and am now unable to connect to the internet. When I went to the event viewer, I noticed the following error messages:

  Event type: error

  Event source: Service Control Manager

  Event category: no

  Event ID: 7000

  Date: 16/01/2012

  Time: 12:31:17

  User:                       N/A

  Computer: JARRIOUSSTUDIO

  Description:

  The NetBios over TCP/IP service failed to start due to the following error:

  The service cannot be started, either because it is disabled or because it has no enabled devices is associated to him.

  Event type: error

  Event source: Service Control Manager

  Event category: no

  Event ID: 7001

  Date: 16/01/2012

  Time: 12:31:17

  User:                       N/A

  Computer: JARRIOUSSTUDIO

  Description:

  The DHCP Client service depends on the NetBios over TCP/IP service which failed to start because of the following error:

  The service cannot be started, either because it is disabled or because it has no enabled devices is associated to him.

  Event type: error

  Event source: Service Control Manager

  Event category: no

  Event ID: 7001

  Date: 16/01/2012

  Time: 13:32:01

  User:                       N/A

  Computer: JARRIOUSSTUDIO

  Description:

  The DHCP Client service depends on the NetBios over TCP/IP service which failed to start because of the following error:

  A device attached to the system does not work.

  Event type: error

  Event source: Service Control Manager

  Event category: no

  Event ID: 7001

  Date: 16/01/2012

  Time: 13:32:01

  User:                       N/A

  Computer: JARRIOUSSTUDIO

  Description:

  The helpdesk TCP/IP NetBIOS depends on the NetBios over TCP/IP service which failed to start because of the following error:

  A device attached to the system does not work.

  When I look in the Drivers folder, I see netbt, but devices & Non Plug and Play Devices, of TCPIP NETBios is not listed in Manager.

  Hi Diddy Dell,

  Follow these methods.

  Method 1: Performs a search using the Microsoft safety scanner.

  http://www.Microsoft.com/security/scanner/en-us/default.aspx

  Note: The data files that are infected must be cleaned only by removing the file completely, which means that there is a risk of data loss.

  Method 2: Follow these steps:

  Step 1: Start the computer in safe mode with network and check if the problem persists.

  A description of the options to start in Windows XP Mode

  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/315222

  Step 2: If the problem does not persist in SafeMode with network, perform a clean boot to see if there is a software conflict as the clean boot helps eliminate software conflicts.

  How to configure Windows XP to start in a "clean boot" State

  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/310353

  Note: After completing the steps in the clean boot troubleshooting, follow the section How to configure Windows to use a Normal startup state of the link to return the computer to a Normal startupmode.

  After the clean boot used to resolve the problem, you can follow these steps to configure Windows XP to start normally.

  (a) click Start, run.

  (b) type msconfigand click OK.

  (c) the System Configuration Utility dialog box appears.

  (d) click the general tab, click Normal startup - load all services and device drivers and then click OK.

  (e) when you are prompted, click on restart to restart the computer.

  Method 3: Follow the steps in the article.

  How to reset the Protocol Internet (TCP/IP)

  http://support.Microsoft.com/kb/299357

  Windows wireless and wired network connection problems

  http://Windows.Microsoft.com/en-us/Windows/help/wired-and-wireless-network-connection-problems-in-Windows

• Disabling NetBIOS over TCP/IP

  Don't know if I'm in the right forum or not, but I have about 25 remote PCs, all on Windows XP (don't worry, they will be upgraded to Windows 7 at the end of the year), for which I need to disable NetBIOS over TCP/IP and run into a problem.  I tested this command on the command line on several computers in my cabin-

  WMIC / interactive: off nicconfig where TcpipNetbiosOptions = call SetTcpipNetbios 2 0

  Disables it very well if I'm typing on the command line with the PC directly - and almost immediately, too.  But when I connect remotely to a computer offsite (via ssh) which puts me at the command line, if I type this exact command, I'm locked up completely without response from the keyboard either.  I have to close the window - no other way out.  No idea why that might be?

  PS - I even tried to put this command in a batch script and calling the command and he locked up in exactly the same way.

  As I read the article on the first link of Azam, reality that turns off NetBT is set at the server level.

  In fact, the setting at the customer level to 'Setting use NetBIOS on the DHCP server' is the default, so it must be already set that way unless your users have been sleeping.

  There are other ideas in this thread--> http://social.technet.microsoft.com/Forums/en-US/winservercore/thread/d18bd172-e1a0-4a61-ba52-0952a1e3cabc/

• [SOLVED] Error 404 Google + card Tunnel Teredo Tunneling Pseudo-Interface disabled in NetBIOS over TCP/IP

  I realize that it is a long title.  It could be useful describe my problem.

  Recently, I downloaded something (not sure if I can't talk about website) and with download received 4 bad files found by Malwarebytes named: PUP. OfferBundle and PUP. ToolbarDownload.  These 4 files were quarantined and then removed, but this does not solve my problem.  I ran Microsoft and other spyware, but nothing more has been discovered.

  I have Norton Internet Security, which extends constantly and I always have these terrible files.

  I can not access Google search engine.  I get this message: error 404 (not FOUND)! 1

  The address bar reads: cgi-bin/redirect.ha.  I have another computer and am able to access Google since the router same use so I know there are still a few malware rootkit on my computer which may be connected to the Teredo Tunneling adapter, I don't understand.

  I'm not sure how to solve this problem.  I don't know where watch, but ran many scans of data collection.  Here is a part of a single test showing wireless and LAN configurations:

  Windows IP configuration

  Name of the host...: StrikingEagle-HP

  Primary Dns suffix...:

  Node... type: hybrid

  Active... IP routing: No.

  Active... proxy WINS: No.

  ... DNS suffix search list: att.net

  Wireless Network Connection 2 wireless LAN adapter:

  State of the media...: Media disconnected

  The connection-specific DNS suffix. :

  ... Description: Microsoft Virtual WiFi Miniport adapt

  Physical address.... : 20-10-7A-1C-AF-7D

  DHCP active...: Yes

  Autoconfiguration enabled...: Yes

  Wireless network connection Wireless LAN adapter:

  The connection-specific DNS suffix. : att.net

  Description...: Realtek RTL8188CE 802.11b/g/n WiFi adapt

  Physical address.... : 20-10-7A-1C-AF-7D

  DHCP active...: Yes

  Autoconfiguration enabled...: Yes

  IPv6 address: 2602:306:cdb8:5300:b5fc:b411:6df0:e722 (Preferred)

  Temporary IPv6 address...: 2602:306:cdb8:5300:b9d4:2772:d89a:3a5f (Preferred)

  Address IPv6 local link...: fe80::b5fc:b411:6df0:e722% 13 (Preferred)

  IPv4 address...: 192.168.1.73 (Preferred)

  ... Subnet mask: 255.255.255.0.

  Lease obtained...: Sunday, April 22, 2012 23:29:35

  End of the lease...: Monday, April 23, 2012 23:29:34

  ... Default gateway. : fe80::42b7:f3ff:fec9:a2e0% 13

  192.168.1.254

  DHCP server...: 192.168.1.254

  DHCPv6 IOOKING...: 320868474

  DHCPv6 DUID customer...: 00-01-00-01-16-A6-EF-8E-2C-41-38-5C-76-B6

  DNS servers...: 192.168.1.254

  NetBIOS over TCP/IP...: enabled

  Ethernet connection to the Local network card:

  The connection-specific DNS suffix. : att.net

  Description...: Realtek PCIe GBE Family Controller

  Physical address.... : 2C-41-38-5C-76-B6

  DHCP active...: Yes

  Autoconfiguration enabled...: Yes

  IPv6 address: 2602:306:cdb8:5300:584d:2ddf:6 a 08: f6a7 (Preferred)

  Temporary IPv6 address...: 2602:306:cdb8:5300:575:56e9:298d:9097 (Preferred)

  Address IPv6 local link...: fe80::584d:2ddf:6 a 08: f6a7% 11 (Preferred)

  IPv4 address: 192.168.1.71 (Preferred)

  ... Subnet mask: 255.255.255.0.

  Lease obtained...: Sunday, April 22, 2012 23:29:32

  End of the lease...: Monday, April 23, 2012 23:29:32

  ... Default gateway. : fe80::42b7:f3ff:fec9:a2e0% 11

  192.168.1.254

  DHCP server...: 192.168.1.254

  DHCPv6 IOOKING...: 237781304

  DHCPv6 DUID customer...: 00-01-00-01-16-A6-EF-8E-2C-41-38-5C-76-B6

  DNS servers...: 192.168.1.254

  NetBIOS over TCP/IP...: enabled

  Tunnel adapter isatap. {38655146-6231-4777-AB1C-2DC12E0017FD}:

  State of the media...: Media disconnected

  The connection-specific DNS suffix. :

  ... Description: Microsoft ISATAP adapter

  Physical address.... : 00-00-00-00-00-00-00-E0

  DHCP active...: No.

  Autoconfiguration enabled...: Yes

  Card tunnel Local Area Connection * 9:

  State of the media...: Media disconnected

  The connection-specific DNS suffix. :

  ... Description: Microsoft 6to4 card

  Physical address.... : 00-00-00-00-00-00-00-E0

  DHCP active...: No.

  Autoconfiguration enabled...: Yes

  Tunnel adapter ISATAP.att.NET:

  State of the media...: Media disconnected

  The connection-specific DNS suffix. : att.net

  ... Description: Adapter Microsoft ISATAP #2

  Physical address.... : 00-00-00-00-00-00-00-E0

  DHCP active...: No.

  Autoconfiguration enabled...: Yes

  Card tunnel Teredo Tunneling Pseudo-Interface:

  The connection-specific DNS suffix. :

  ... Description: Teredo Tunneling Pseudo-Interface

  Physical address.... : 00-00-00-00-00-00-00-E0

  DHCP active...: No.

  Autoconfiguration enabled...: Yes

  IPv6 address: 2001:0:4137:9e76:2413:2ee1:3f57:feb8 (Preferred)

  Address IPv6 local link...: fe80::2413:2ee1:3f57:feb8% 14 (Preferred)

  ... Default gateway. :

  NetBIOS over TCP/IP...: disabled

  Server: dsldevice.att.net

  Address: 192.168.1.254

  Name: google.com

  Address: 74.125.227.40

  74.125.227.41

  74.125.227.46

  74.125.227.32

  74.125.227.33

  74.125.227.34

  74.125.227.35

  74.125.227.36

  74.125.227.37

  74.125.227.38

  74.125.227.39

  Please note the last entry.  DHCP is not enabled.  NetBIOS over TCP/IP is disabled.  Now, it's for the Tunnel Teredo Tunneling Pseudo-Interface AND Google map is registered immediately thereafter with a list of IP addresses.

  Would be - why I can't access Google?  How can I fix it?  How can I activate this card Tunnel?  I want to do this?  I did a ping for the Tunnel of the card test and it seemed to work OK.  How do I know if card Tunnel is really on?   Why is the Tcpip BIOS

  people with disabilities in the last list of IP and not on others?  Why are all those Google IP addresses listed?

  Any help is greatly appreciated.  I'm very stuck.  Thank you.

  Edit = Edit

  has run another scan: MicrosoftSecurity Agent (I think) that produced a VERY long report, CBS.  There are a lot of mistakes in this report, and I don't know which ones were repaired my Microsoft or if errors are related to my problem.  Here are some of the errors.  All t errors are repeated throughout the report. I hope this info is helpful:

  2012-04-11 07:29:06, CBS Session info: 30218206_2951615106 initialized by the WindowsUpdateAgent client.

  2012-04-11 07:29:06, missing version of the CBS identity information. [HRESULT = 0 X 80070057 - E_INVALIDARG]

  2012-04-11 07:29:06, error CBS has no identity shred: Microsoft-Windows-Internet Explorer-LanguagePack [HRESULT =

  0 X 80070057 - E_INVALIDARG]

  2012-04-11 07:29:06, CBS Session info: 30218206_2951615106 initialized by the WindowsUpdateAgent client.

  2012-04-11 07:29:06, missing version of the CBS identity information. [HRESULT = 0 X 80070057 - E_INVALIDARG]

  2012-04-11 07:29:06, error CBS has no identity shred: Microsoft-Windows-Internet Explorer-LanguagePack [HRESULT =

  0 X 80070057 - E_INVALIDARG]

  2012-04-11 07:29:07, CBS Session info: 30218206_2956451109 initialized by the WindowsUpdateAgent client.

  2012-04-11 07:29:07, info CBS doesn't have the package opened internally. [HRESULT = 0X800F0805 - CBS_E_INVALID_PACKAGE]

  2012-04-11 11:20:30, CBS M² info: could not start the download with pattern file: C:\Windows\servicing\sqm\*_std.sqm, flags: 0 x 2 [HRESULT = 0 x E_FAIL 80004005]

  Hello
   
   
  We are pleased to know that the problem is solved.
  We know in the future if you have problems with Microsoft Windows.

• SIP over VPN tunnel

  We have VPN tunnel in our firewall with the other partner peer. We use ASA 5520 with IOS "asa825-k8" and ASDM version 6.4.

  our partner has several services running in this tunnel VPN, including the SIP.

  other services work very well only SIP connections cannot come.

  the question is we allowed any IP service on the inside and outside interfaces, but this topic could not come to the top.

  is - there any SIP over VPN option must be configured on ASA?

  Hello

  As you can see in the newspapers, it is denied to the inside interface.

  If you just need to allow this by opening an ACL for this traffic on port 5060.

  I would like to know if it works.

  Kind regards

  Aditya

  Please evaluate the useful messages and mark the correct answers.

• SIP over VPN and 1.0.2.6 Firmware RV120W

  Updated 1.0.2.6 and all of a sudden devices SIP works via the VPN no longer work. Downgrade from version 1.0.1.3 and they work again. Any ideas? My guess is that some ports are blocked on the VPN in 1.0.2.6

  I thought the whole idea was that fixed bugs rather than introduce firmware ugrades.

  Suggestion for Cisco:-Zip downloads of image of the firmware, or have an upgrade process which includes a CRC check, as it at least the poor punter will have an indication if they have been damaged. I had a subtle memory problem that corrupts certain files. Download of the firmware seems to fill in correctly and you can log on OK but some menu choices resulted in a deadlock with the "Please wait... the page is loading" message. Thorough check of the file sizes revealed that the file I'm downloading in the router is different in size to those on the site, a few hundred bytes must have been corrupted during the download. But the download was normal with no indication of any errors. It's a pretty basic protection measure that should be there as a no-brainer with the router was conducting a CRC check and showing an error if it fails.

  Hello Michael,

  Maybe you have active SIP Application layer gateway. Please try to disable this SIP over VPN works great.

  Firewall--> avancΘs--> remove the checkbox of the SIP ALG.

  Thank you

  Nero - UNITED Arab Emirates

• Routing over VPN between ISA550W and RV215W

  Hello all I have a problem with the VPN between my two office

  I have an ISA550W at the head office (chcnorth)

  I have a RV215W to the remote desktop (chcsouth)

  the VPN is up and running, I can connect from Headquarters to remote control (chcsouth-RV215W)

  and vice versa however when client computers on the remote end are trying to connect to the

  Main office to access the database, they can't.

  the problem started last week I received a call from the remote desktop that they can connect to our database

  on the main office, I tried to connect remotely to see what was going on, it turns out that the router has completely put back

  at the plant, including the firmware

  I reinstalled the latest firmware for the RV215W of installation all connections as they were, I could

  get VPN to connect, I can ping to the interface of the RV215W from my seat and I ping the ISA550W

  the remote desktop, however my remote clients still cannot access my server at the main office

  I realized after I have everything set up, I had a backup of my original installation and thinking I had

  just missed something I restored it to the firmware to factory upgraded to power and restored the backup of the

  RV215W I've had. still no dice

  So I am now at a loss, there were no other changes to the network on both ends, I've been on this som my eyes several times

  are blurred,

  any ideas, workarounds for solutions would be greatly appreciated

  Thanks in advance

  John G

  John,

  It doesn't look like your question is more DNS related, as you can access the server by its IP address if the "connection" allows you to set up this way. It is quite common, that you cannot resolve names through the tunnel because netbios broadcasts will not pass. The RV215W have shared DNS within the parameters of the tunnel, so this isn't an option more.

  If the "connection" is a PC, you can work around this by editing the LMHOSTS file. Please see the following instructions:

  http://www.JakeLudington.com/Windows_7/20100924_how_to_edit_windows_7_lmhosts_file.html

  In your case, it might look more at:

  192.168.1.200 sqlsvr

  Now if you ping or try to access sqlsvr from the computer, it will automatically know that it should go to 192.168.1.200 without having to find the IP address.

  Answer please if you have any questions.

  -Marty

• Try to send all traffic over VPN

  Hello

  I have a Cisco 871 router on my home cable modem connection. I am trying to set up a VPN, and I want to send all traffic over the VPN from connected clients (no split tunnel).

  I can connect to the VPN and I can ping/access resources on my home LAN when I'm remote but access to the internet channels.

  If its possible I would have 2 Configuration of profiles according to connection 1 connection sends all traffic to the vpn and the connection on the other split tunneling but for now, I'd be happy with everything just all traffic go via the VPN.

  Here is my config.

  10.10.10.xxx is my home network inside LAN

  10.10.20.xxx is the IP range assigned when connecting to the VPN

  FastEthernet4 is my WAN interface.

  Kernel #show run
  Building configuration...

  Current configuration: 4981 bytes
  !
  version 12.4
  service configuration
  no service button
  tcp KeepAlive-component snap-in service
  a tcp-KeepAlive-quick service
  horodateurs service debug datetime localtime show-timezone msec
  Log service timestamps datetime localtime show-timezone msec
  encryption password service
  sequence numbers service
  !
  hostname-Core
  !
  boot-start-marker
  boot-end-marker
  !
  Security of authentication failure rate 3 log
  Passwords security min-length 6
  forest-meter operation of syslog messages
  no set record in buffered memory
  enable secret 5 XXXXX
  !
  AAA new-model
  !
  !
  AAA authentication login default local
  AAA authentication login ciscocp_vpn_xauth_ml_1 local
  AAA authorization exec default local
  AAA authorization ciscocp_vpn_group_ml_1 LAN
  !
  !
  AAA - the id of the joint session
  !
  Crypto pki trustpoint Core_Certificate
  enrollment selfsigned
  Serial number no
  IP address no
  crl revocation checking
  rsakeypair 512 Core_Certificate_RSAKey
  !
  !
  string Core_Certificate crypto pki certificates
  certificate self-signed 01
  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
  quit smoking
  dot11 syslog
  no ip source route
  !
  !
  !
  !
  IP cef
  no ip bootp Server
  name of the IP-server 75.75.75.75
  name of the IP-server 75.75.76.76
  No ipv6 cef
  !
  Authenticated MultiLink bundle-name Panel
  !
  !
  !
  password username privilege 15 7 XXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX
  username secret privilege 15 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX 5
  !
  !
  crypto ISAKMP policy 1
  BA 3des
  preshared authentication
  Group 2
  !
  crypto ISAKMP client configuration main group
  key to XXXXXXX
  DNS 75.75.75.75 75.75.76.76
  pool SDM_POOL_3
  Max-users 5
  netmask 255.255.255.0
  ISAKMP crypto ciscocp-ike-profile-1 profile
  main group identity match
  client authentication list ciscocp_vpn_xauth_ml_1
  ISAKMP authorization list ciscocp_vpn_group_ml_1
  client configuration address respond
  virtual-model 1
  !
  !
  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-SHA-ESP-3DES-3des esp-sha-hmac
  !
  Profile of crypto ipsec CiscoCP_Profile1
  game of transformation-ESP-3DES-SHA
  set of isakmp - profile ciscocp-ike-profile-1
  !
  !
  Crypto ctcp port 64444
  Archives
  The config log
  hidekeys
  !
  !
  synwait-time of tcp IP 10
  property intellectual ssh time 60
  property intellectual ssh authentication-2 retries
  property intellectual ssh version 1
  !
  !
  !
  Null0 interface
  no ip unreachable
  !
  interface FastEthernet0
  !
  interface FastEthernet1
  !
  interface FastEthernet2
  !
  interface FastEthernet3
  !
  interface FastEthernet4
  Description $ETH - WAN$ $FW_OUTSIDE$
  address IP dhcp client id FastEthernet4
  no ip redirection
  no ip unreachable
  no ip proxy-arp
  penetration of the IP stream
  NAT outside IP
  IP virtual-reassembly
  automatic duplex
  automatic speed
  !
  type of interface virtual-Template1 tunnel
  Description $FW_INSIDE$
  IP unnumbered FastEthernet4
  no ip redirection
  no ip unreachable
  no ip proxy-arp
  penetration of the IP stream
  ipv4 ipsec tunnel mode
  Tunnel CiscoCP_Profile1 ipsec protection profile
  !
  interface Vlan1
  Description $FW_INSIDE$
  IP 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.0
  no ip redirection
  no ip unreachable
  no ip proxy-arp
  penetration of the IP stream
  IP nat inside
  IP virtual-reassembly
  !
  local IP SDM_POOL_1 10.10.30.10 pool 10.10.30.15
  local IP SDM_POOL_2 10.10.10.80 pool 10.10.10.85
  local IP SDM_POOL_3 10.10.20.10 pool 10.10.20.15
  IP forward-Protocol ND
  IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 permanent FastEthernet4
  IP http server
  access-class 2 IP http
  local IP http authentication
  no ip http secure server
  !
  !
  the IP nat inside source 1 list the interface FastEthernet4 overload
  !
  Note category of access list 1 = 2 CCP_ACL
  access-list 1 permit 10.10.5.0 0.0.0.255
  access-list 1 permit 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.255
  access-list 2 Note HTTP access class
  Note access-list category 2 CCP_ACL = 1
  access-list 2 allow 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.255
  access-list 2 refuse any
  not run cdp

  !
  !
  !
  !
  !
  control plan
  !
  connection of the banner ^ CThis is a private router and all access is controlled and connected. ^ C
  !
  Line con 0
  no activation of the modem
  telnet output transport
  line to 0
  telnet output transport
  line vty 0 4
  access-class 2
  entry ssh transport
  !
  max-task-time 5000 Planner
  Scheduler allocate 4000 1000
  Scheduler interval 500
  end

  Kernel #.

  Thanks for your help!

  Hi Joseph,.

  You need a configuration like this:

  customer pool: 10.10.20.0

  local networkbehind router: 10.10.10.0

  R (config) #ip - list extended access 101
  R (config-ext-nacl) 10.10.20.0 ip #deny 0.0.0.255 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.255
  R (config-ext-nacl) 10.10.20.0 ip #permit 0.0.0.255 any

  type of interface virtual-Template1 tunnel
  Description $FW_INSIDE$
  political IP VPN route map

  R (config) #ip - list extended access 103
  R (config-ext-nacl) #permit ip all 10.10.20.0 0.0.0.255

  R (config) #route - map allowed VPN 10
  Ip address of R #match (config-route-map) 101
  R (config-route-map) #set interface loopback1
  R (config) #route - map allowed VPN 20
  Ip address of R #match (config-route-map) 103
  R (config-route-map) #set interface loopback1

  You must now exonerated NAT for VPN traffic:

  ===================================

  R (config) #ip - 102 extended access list
  R #deny (config-ext-nacl) ip 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.255 10.10.20.0 0.0.0.255
  R (config-ext-nacl) 10.10.10.0 ip #permit 0.0.0.255 any
  R (config-ext-nacl) 10.10.20.0 ip #deny 0.0.0.255 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.255
  R (config-ext-nacl) 10.10.20.0 ip #permit 0.0.0.255 any

  overload of IP nat inside source list 102 interface FastEthernet4

  Let me know if this can help,

  See you soon,.

  Christian V

• Relay DHCP over VPN

  Hi guys,.
  I have a problem with the implementation of DHCP relay mode on my VPN.
  The VPN works fine and I can access the remote router, printers, no etc. via their internal IP (192.168.0.xxx) no problem. My setup is as follows.

  A SRX5308 based in the United Kingdom with DHCP activated using ip/subnet addresses varies 192.168.0.50 - 192.168.0.100/255.255.255.0. The router has an ip address 192.168.0.1 and a reserved/static parameters of 192.168.0.2 to 192.168.0.40.

  A SRXN3205 based in France with initial settings of DHCP enabled using ip/subnet addresses varies 192.168.10.2 - 192.168.10.20/255.255.255.0. The router has 192.168.10.1 IP address.

  The VPN is set up through 2 COMPLETE domain name addresses using th VPN wizzard ends in order to define the policies and works fine without errors or school drop-outs.

  The problem of the french side. When I enable DHCP relay mode in the SRXN3205 it starts ok but do not relay the IP addresses of the United Kingdom.

  Any ideas?

  Just be aware that it is not really a good idea to run DHCP via a VPN, as if for some reason any VPN breaks down, computers on the remote site will not be able to get an IP address & the entire network it could enter the crisis...

  Personally, I use DHCP on the site with the server and I use static, remote sites. I could probably use a local DHCP server on each site, but for the number of computers involved, using static has been easier.

• Jabber/MOVI routing over VPN on VCS-E calls

  Hi all

  I have a problem with the situation to follow.

  -2 Movi Client via VPN Tunnel on the motorway-VCS connectet

  -the two VPN tunnel on the same subnet.

  -Ice set up NO!

  Now the problem is that the traffic is passing through the VCS-E but goes multimedia traffic, which is in this situation via VPN would not be allowed.

  Is it possible to configure something that all signaling and media traffic is going through the VCS-E if the two MOVI Client on the same subnet?

  Best regards

  Georg

  The call between the Jabber bot and video customers have the same contact address of sip and IP source address, then VCS will treat as non-traversal call (client is not behind the firewall).

  That's why VCS won't stay in media routing.

  You are able to configure the VPN client DHCP range for the different subnet IP address?

• NAT over VPN IP Pool

  Hello

  I just want to ask if it is possible to NAT pool users to remote access ip VPN to the router is outside the IP address? The router is a Cisco1841.

  Thank you!

  Patricia,

  Are you referring to Polo your RA IP pool using your external interface just like you with your LAN subnets in ip nat overload?, if so this link illustrates similar example using the road map, PLS let know us if this isn't what you're looking for and if you could perhaps develop as that is what you try to accomplish.

  http://www.Cisco.com/en/us/products/sw/secursw/ps2308/products_configuration_example09186a008073b06b.shtml

  Concerning

• AnyConnect: How to route ALL traffic over VPN

  In the past, when I use a built-in Windows VPN (PPTP), I could choose everything would go through the VPN, or if only the things that did not resolve been there. I copy/paste the VPN connection and rename them so we called something_all and the other something_std. I choose which one I needed and start this one.

  Now I use Secure Mobility Cisco AnyConnect Client (on my Windows 7 machine), I don't seem to have this option. I seem to be locked in a mode where only the URLS that fail to solve find themselves through the VPN. It works for the private areas, my employer. This means having access to machines which are not turned to the audience.

  My problem is that, sometimes, I want everything to go through it. For example, if I'm in Europe and that someone (in America) tells me that I need to visit a site and solve a problem, what I find is that despite type in American URL, I get redirected to the European site, because it is a public site. I want to switch the VPN in the mode 'road everything', or even better, to have a list that I manage areas I want to go through it (even if the all or nothing is all that I really need).

  Is this possible? I saw the option called something like 'allow access to the local network', but this doesn't seem to be something useful.

  The ultimate test is that if I go to one of these sites, what - is - my - ip - address, it does not say I'm in Europe, but on the contrary says: I'm in America (or as much as the goal of the VPN is, I have several choices of my employer).

  If instead of "tunnelspecified", we use the keyword "tunnelall" the value with 'split-tunnel-policy', which will push the route 0.0.0.0/0 for the session of your client.

  It is indeed the wildcard character that you are asking about.

• Two RV016, gateway to gateway, routing over VPN

  Hello

  I have two RV016, I have a vpn connection from gateway to gateway between the two and I can ping computers on both sides, but I can't reach the third lan (10.0.0.0/255.0.0.0). I can join this network to routerA but not of routerB.

  My Network typology:

  

  Configuration of routers (see attachments)

  How can I configure static routes on router B?

  I tried to do, but it does not work (see RouterB_routing.jpg)

  Can someone help me?

  Thank you.

  Krzysztof,

  
  

  Unfortunately the rv016 you cannot make static through the vpn tunnel routes as it isn't an ipsec interface in the static routes section of the router.  This is normal, the router will recognize that the default setting of lan in the vpn tunnel.

  
  

  You need to business routers to make the static routes through the ipsec tunnel.

• no nat over vpn after vpn

  I have a site (my ASA) vpn to the site (provider) with a nat on the external interface device and work well. Rear (my ASA) VPN I have other site vpn (service A) for the site (my ASA) and work as well.

  My problem is the traffic of my branch A provider is clearly have no nat.

  My ASA

  object-group network attached
  object-network 192.168.1.0 255.255.255.0
  object-group network provider
  network-object 172.22.0.0 255.255.0.0
  the allmyBranch object-group network
  object-network 192.168.0.0 255.255.0.0

  extended inside permit access list ip object-group reteInside-group of objects plugged
  access list inside extended permit ip object-group allmyBranch-provider objects
  allowed to access extensive ip list nat0_acl object-group reteInside-group of objects plugged
  list of access VPN-Hots extended permitted ip object-group reteInside-group of objects plugged
  list of access VPN-provider allowed extended ip outside of the provider object-group interface
  list of access VPN-provider allowed extended ip object-group allmyBranch-provider objects
  permit ToSupplier to access extended ip object-group allmyBranch-group of objects provider list

  Global 1 interface (outside)
  NAT (inside) 0-list of access nat0_acl
  NAT (inside) 1 access-list ToSupplier

  do you have any idea how solve it? is this possible?

  Thank you

  I'm glad to hear that.

  If the problem is resolved and that you find it useful, if Please assess the threat and mark it as answered :-)

  Thank you.

  Federico.