SIP over VPN and 1.0.2.6 Firmware RV120W

Similar Questions

• SIP over VPN tunnel

  We have VPN tunnel in our firewall with the other partner peer. We use ASA 5520 with IOS "asa825-k8" and ASDM version 6.4.

  our partner has several services running in this tunnel VPN, including the SIP.

  other services work very well only SIP connections cannot come.

  the question is we allowed any IP service on the inside and outside interfaces, but this topic could not come to the top.

  is - there any SIP over VPN option must be configured on ASA?

  Hello

  As you can see in the newspapers, it is denied to the inside interface.

  If you just need to allow this by opening an ACL for this traffic on port 5060.

  I would like to know if it works.

  Kind regards

  Aditya

  Please evaluate the useful messages and mark the correct answers.

• SPA112 & SIP122 - bytes of garbage sent using the SIP over TCP

  Because the port UDP 5060 is blocked in my case, the SIP over TCP is a good solution for me.

  But when I put SPA112 to use SIP over TCP, the server record is still broken.

  (I used the version of the firmware is latest: 1.3.3 but older versions has the same behavior.)

  After capturing packets, a problem is found:

  Each time before SPA112 has sent a message to register, there were 9 frames of data sent before him.

  Each frame has 20 bytes, and the content is the same.

  The 20 bytes has a motive: the first 4 bytes is always 00 01 00 00.

  So come with 4 * 4 bytes, for example, d8 22 6 b 17 d8 d8 d8 22 6 b 17 22 6 b 17 b 22 6, 17

  So, in the stream TCP, the register message is like:

  ....."k.." k.. » k.. » k......"k.." k.. » k.. » k......"k.." k.. » k.. » k......"k.." k.. » k.. » k......"k.." k.. » k.. » k......"k.." k.. » k.. » k......"k.." k.. » k.. » k......"k.." k.. » k.. » k......"k.." k.. "" k... "k.NOTIFY sip:sip.callwithus.com:5060 SIP/2.0

  Via:...

  The server responded immediately "SIP/2.0 484 address incomplete."

  Then send SPA112 record message again, this time it succeeded and the server response "SIP/2.0 401 Unauthorized '.

  Seems good.

  Subsequently, SPA112 has sent a new message digest information register but the bytes of garbage appeared again.

  Is there any configuration on this bytes of garbage?

  It seems that you hit the Nice firmware bug. I can tell you what I see in captured TCP stream.

  Your client is connected to the SIP server, but it is not start sending SIP messages - it STUN via the stream instead. You caught "STUN Binding request" nine times before the first SIP package. And an another STUN is tried before the second REGISTER.

  This is a bug with doubt - STUN have nothing to do in the stream TCP SIP. As the switch waits for the SIP packets, it is confused by byte STUN causing packets SIP to be misunderstood and rejected.

  Unfortunately, I have no idea how to report a bug in firmware to Cisco, unless you are willing to pay for it.

  On the other side, it would be that hard to solve the problem. Just disable the STUN.

  Thread mark as answered if it solves your problem, it will help others to find solutions.

• remote VPN and vpn site to site vpn remote users unable to access the local network

  As per below config remote vpn and vpn site to site vpn remote users unable to access the local network please suggest me a required config

  The local 192.168.215.4 not able ping server IP this server connectivity remote vpn works fine but not able to ping to the local network vpn users.

  ASA Version 8.2 (2)
  !
  host name
  domain kunchevrolet
  activate r8xwsBuKsSP7kABz encrypted password
  r8xwsBuKsSP7kABz encrypted passwd
  names of
  !
  interface Ethernet0/0
  nameif outside
  security-level 0
  PPPoE client vpdn group dataone
  IP address pppoe
  !
  interface Ethernet0/1
  nameif inside
  security-level 50
  IP 192.168.215.2 255.255.255.0
  !
  interface Ethernet0/2
  nameif Internet
  security-level 0
  IP address dhcp setroute
  !
  interface Ethernet0/3
  Shutdown
  No nameif
  no level of security
  no ip address
  !
  interface Management0/0
  Shutdown
  No nameif
  no level of security
  no ip address
  management only
  !
  passive FTP mode
  clock timezone IST 5 30
  DNS server-group DefaultDNS
  domain kunchevrolet
  permit same-security-traffic intra-interface
  object-group network GM-DC-VPN-Gateway
  object-group, net-LAN
  access extensive list ip 192.168.215.0 sptnl allow 255.255.255.0 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0
  192.168.215.0 IP Access-list extended sheep 255.255.255.0 allow 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0
  tunnel of splitting allowed access list standard 192.168.215.0 255.255.255.0
  pager lines 24
  Enable logging
  asdm of logging of information
  Outside 1500 MTU
  Within 1500 MTU
  MTU 1500 Internet
  IP local pool VPN_Users 192.168.2.1 - 192.168.2.250 mask 255.255.255.0
  ICMP unreachable rate-limit 1 burst-size 1
  enable ASDM history
  ARP timeout 14400
  NAT-control
  Global 1 interface (outside)
  NAT (inside) 1 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0
  Route outside 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 59.90.214.1 1
  Timeout xlate 03:00
  Timeout conn 01:00 half-closed 0:10:00 udp 0:02:00 icmp 0:00:02
  Sunrpc timeout 0:10:00 h323 0:05:00 h225 mgcp from 01:00 0:05:00 mgcp-pat 0:05:00
  Sip timeout 0:30:00 sip_media 0:02:00 prompt Protocol sip-0: 03:00 sip - disconnect 0:02:00
  Timeout sip-provisional-media 0:02:00 uauth 0:05:00 absolute
  timeout tcp-proxy-reassembly 0:01:00
  dynamic-access-policy-registration DfltAccessPolicy
  the ssh LOCAL console AAA authentication
  AAA authentication LOCAL telnet console
  AAA authentication http LOCAL console
  AAA authentication enable LOCAL console
  LOCAL AAA authentication serial console
  Enable http server
  x.x.x.x 255.255.255.252 out http
  http 192.168.215.0 255.255.255.252 inside
  http 192.168.215.0 255.255.255.0 inside
  No snmp server location
  No snmp Server contact
  Server enable SNMP traps snmp authentication linkup, linkdown cold start
  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-3des esp-sha-hmac RIGHT
  life crypto ipsec security association seconds 28800
  Crypto ipsec kilobytes of life - safety 4608000 association
  Crypto-map dynamic dynmap 65500 transform-set RIGHT
  card crypto 10 VPN ipsec-isakmp dynamic dynmap
  card crypto VPN outside interface
  card crypto 10 ASA-01 set peer 221.135.138.130
  card crypto 10 ASA - 01 the transform-set RIGHT value
  crypto ISAKMP allow outside
  crypto ISAKMP policy 10
  preshared authentication
  3des encryption
  sha hash
  Group 2
  life 86400
  crypto ISAKMP policy 65535
  preshared authentication
  the Encryption
  sha hash
  Group 2
  lifetime 28800
  Telnet 192.168.215.0 255.255.255.0 inside
  Telnet timeout 5
  SSH 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 outdoors
  SSH timeout 5
  Console timeout 0
  management-access inside
  VPDN group dataone request dialout pppoe
  VPDN group dataone localname bb4027654187_scdrid
  VPDN group dataone ppp authentication chap
  VPDN username bb4027654187_scdrid password * local store
  interface for identifying DHCP-client Internet customer
  dhcpd dns 218.248.255.141 218.248.245.1
  !
  dhcpd address 192.168.215.11 - 192.168.215.254 inside
  dhcpd allow inside
  !
  a basic threat threat detection
  Statistics-list of access threat detection
  no statistical threat detection tcp-interception
  Des-sha1 encryption SSL
  WebVPN
  allow outside
  tunnel-group-list activate
  internal kun group policy
  kun group policy attributes
  VPN - connections 8
  Protocol-tunnel-VPN IPSec
  Split-tunnel-policy tunnelspecified
  Split-tunnel-network-list value split tunnel
  kunchevrolet value by default-field
  test P4ttSyrm33SV8TYp encrypted password username
  username kunauto password bSHrKTGl8PUbvus / encrypted privilege 15
  username kunauto attributes
  Strategy Group-VPN-kun
  Protocol-tunnel-VPN IPSec
  tunnel-group vpngroup type remote access
  tunnel-group vpngroup General attributes
  address pool VPN_Users
  Group Policy - by default-kun
  tunnel-group vpngroup webvpn-attributes
  the vpngroup group alias activation
  vpngroup group tunnel ipsec-attributes
  pre-shared key *.
  type tunnel-group test remote access
  tunnel-group x.x.x.x type ipsec-l2l
  tunnel-group ipsec-attributes x.x.x.x
  pre-shared key *.
  !
  class-map inspection_default
  match default-inspection-traffic
  !
  !
  type of policy-card inspect dns preset_dns_map
  parameters
  maximum message length automatic of customer
  message-length maximum 512
  Policy-map global_policy
  class inspection_default
  inspect the preset_dns_map dns
  inspect the ftp
  inspect h323 h225
  inspect the h323 ras
  Review the ip options
  inspect the netbios
  inspect the rsh
  inspect the rtsp
  inspect the skinny
  inspect esmtp
  inspect sqlnet
  inspect sunrpc
  inspect the tftp
  inspect the sip
  inspect xdmcp
  inspect the icmp
  !
  global service-policy global_policy
  context of prompt hostname
  call-home
  Profile of CiscoTAC-1
  no active account
  http https://tools.cisco.com/its/service/oddce/services/DDCEService destination address
  email address of destination [email protected] / * /
  destination-mode http transport
  Subscribe to alert-group diagnosis
  Subscribe to alert-group environment
  Subscribe to alert-group monthly periodic inventory
  monthly periodicals to subscribe to alert-group configuration
  daily periodic subscribe to alert-group telemetry
  Cryptochecksum:0d2497e1280e41ab3875e77c6b184cf8
  : end
  kunauto #.

  Hello

  Looking at the configuration, there is an access list this nat exemption: -.

  192.168.215.0 IP Access-list extended sheep 255.255.255.0 allow 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0

  But it is not applied in the States of nat.

  Send the following command to the nat exemption to apply: -.

  NAT (inside) 0 access-list sheep

  Kind regards

  Dinesh Moudgil

  P.S. Please mark this message as 'Responded' If you find this information useful so that it brings goodness to other users of the community

• Try to send all traffic over VPN

  Hello

  I have a Cisco 871 router on my home cable modem connection. I am trying to set up a VPN, and I want to send all traffic over the VPN from connected clients (no split tunnel).

  I can connect to the VPN and I can ping/access resources on my home LAN when I'm remote but access to the internet channels.

  If its possible I would have 2 Configuration of profiles according to connection 1 connection sends all traffic to the vpn and the connection on the other split tunneling but for now, I'd be happy with everything just all traffic go via the VPN.

  Here is my config.

  10.10.10.xxx is my home network inside LAN

  10.10.20.xxx is the IP range assigned when connecting to the VPN

  FastEthernet4 is my WAN interface.

  Kernel #show run
  Building configuration...

  Current configuration: 4981 bytes
  !
  version 12.4
  service configuration
  no service button
  tcp KeepAlive-component snap-in service
  a tcp-KeepAlive-quick service
  horodateurs service debug datetime localtime show-timezone msec
  Log service timestamps datetime localtime show-timezone msec
  encryption password service
  sequence numbers service
  !
  hostname-Core
  !
  boot-start-marker
  boot-end-marker
  !
  Security of authentication failure rate 3 log
  Passwords security min-length 6
  forest-meter operation of syslog messages
  no set record in buffered memory
  enable secret 5 XXXXX
  !
  AAA new-model
  !
  !
  AAA authentication login default local
  AAA authentication login ciscocp_vpn_xauth_ml_1 local
  AAA authorization exec default local
  AAA authorization ciscocp_vpn_group_ml_1 LAN
  !
  !
  AAA - the id of the joint session
  !
  Crypto pki trustpoint Core_Certificate
  enrollment selfsigned
  Serial number no
  IP address no
  crl revocation checking
  rsakeypair 512 Core_Certificate_RSAKey
  !
  !
  string Core_Certificate crypto pki certificates
  certificate self-signed 01
  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
  quit smoking
  dot11 syslog
  no ip source route
  !
  !
  !
  !
  IP cef
  no ip bootp Server
  name of the IP-server 75.75.75.75
  name of the IP-server 75.75.76.76
  No ipv6 cef
  !
  Authenticated MultiLink bundle-name Panel
  !
  !
  !
  password username privilege 15 7 XXXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX
  username secret privilege 15 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXXXX 5
  !
  !
  crypto ISAKMP policy 1
  BA 3des
  preshared authentication
  Group 2
  !
  crypto ISAKMP client configuration main group
  key to XXXXXXX
  DNS 75.75.75.75 75.75.76.76
  pool SDM_POOL_3
  Max-users 5
  netmask 255.255.255.0
  ISAKMP crypto ciscocp-ike-profile-1 profile
  main group identity match
  client authentication list ciscocp_vpn_xauth_ml_1
  ISAKMP authorization list ciscocp_vpn_group_ml_1
  client configuration address respond
  virtual-model 1
  !
  !
  Crypto ipsec transform-set esp-SHA-ESP-3DES-3des esp-sha-hmac
  !
  Profile of crypto ipsec CiscoCP_Profile1
  game of transformation-ESP-3DES-SHA
  set of isakmp - profile ciscocp-ike-profile-1
  !
  !
  Crypto ctcp port 64444
  Archives
  The config log
  hidekeys
  !
  !
  synwait-time of tcp IP 10
  property intellectual ssh time 60
  property intellectual ssh authentication-2 retries
  property intellectual ssh version 1
  !
  !
  !
  Null0 interface
  no ip unreachable
  !
  interface FastEthernet0
  !
  interface FastEthernet1
  !
  interface FastEthernet2
  !
  interface FastEthernet3
  !
  interface FastEthernet4
  Description $ETH - WAN$ $FW_OUTSIDE$
  address IP dhcp client id FastEthernet4
  no ip redirection
  no ip unreachable
  no ip proxy-arp
  penetration of the IP stream
  NAT outside IP
  IP virtual-reassembly
  automatic duplex
  automatic speed
  !
  type of interface virtual-Template1 tunnel
  Description $FW_INSIDE$
  IP unnumbered FastEthernet4
  no ip redirection
  no ip unreachable
  no ip proxy-arp
  penetration of the IP stream
  ipv4 ipsec tunnel mode
  Tunnel CiscoCP_Profile1 ipsec protection profile
  !
  interface Vlan1
  Description $FW_INSIDE$
  IP 10.10.10.1 255.255.255.0
  no ip redirection
  no ip unreachable
  no ip proxy-arp
  penetration of the IP stream
  IP nat inside
  IP virtual-reassembly
  !
  local IP SDM_POOL_1 10.10.30.10 pool 10.10.30.15
  local IP SDM_POOL_2 10.10.10.80 pool 10.10.10.85
  local IP SDM_POOL_3 10.10.20.10 pool 10.10.20.15
  IP forward-Protocol ND
  IP route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 permanent FastEthernet4
  IP http server
  access-class 2 IP http
  local IP http authentication
  no ip http secure server
  !
  !
  the IP nat inside source 1 list the interface FastEthernet4 overload
  !
  Note category of access list 1 = 2 CCP_ACL
  access-list 1 permit 10.10.5.0 0.0.0.255
  access-list 1 permit 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.255
  access-list 2 Note HTTP access class
  Note access-list category 2 CCP_ACL = 1
  access-list 2 allow 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.255
  access-list 2 refuse any
  not run cdp

  !
  !
  !
  !
  !
  control plan
  !
  connection of the banner ^ CThis is a private router and all access is controlled and connected. ^ C
  !
  Line con 0
  no activation of the modem
  telnet output transport
  line to 0
  telnet output transport
  line vty 0 4
  access-class 2
  entry ssh transport
  !
  max-task-time 5000 Planner
  Scheduler allocate 4000 1000
  Scheduler interval 500
  end

  Kernel #.

  Thanks for your help!

  Hi Joseph,.

  You need a configuration like this:

  customer pool: 10.10.20.0

  local networkbehind router: 10.10.10.0

  R (config) #ip - list extended access 101
  R (config-ext-nacl) 10.10.20.0 ip #deny 0.0.0.255 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.255
  R (config-ext-nacl) 10.10.20.0 ip #permit 0.0.0.255 any

  type of interface virtual-Template1 tunnel
  Description $FW_INSIDE$
  political IP VPN route map

  R (config) #ip - list extended access 103
  R (config-ext-nacl) #permit ip all 10.10.20.0 0.0.0.255

  R (config) #route - map allowed VPN 10
  Ip address of R #match (config-route-map) 101
  R (config-route-map) #set interface loopback1
  R (config) #route - map allowed VPN 20
  Ip address of R #match (config-route-map) 103
  R (config-route-map) #set interface loopback1

  You must now exonerated NAT for VPN traffic:

  ===================================

  R (config) #ip - 102 extended access list
  R #deny (config-ext-nacl) ip 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.255 10.10.20.0 0.0.0.255
  R (config-ext-nacl) 10.10.10.0 ip #permit 0.0.0.255 any
  R (config-ext-nacl) 10.10.20.0 ip #deny 0.0.0.255 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.255
  R (config-ext-nacl) 10.10.20.0 ip #permit 0.0.0.255 any

  overload of IP nat inside source list 102 interface FastEthernet4

  Let me know if this can help,

  See you soon,.

  Christian V

• Use TM for wifi, connect the ethernet security camera system, that will work, if it does then how the Installer (need instructions, over 65 and not tech saavy)

  I use a time machine / capsule (latest generation) to my wifi. Just purchased a Lorex security for my home that needs to be connected to the internet (via ethernet). Can I plug the ethernet cable into my time machine without affecting my WIFI? Or I need to by a second router to the ethernet connection?

  I need the instructions very simple and complete, over 65 and not tech saavy!

  Currently using Yosemite 10.10.5 (refuse to upgrade to El Captain until they get the bugs worked, I can't handle many problems lol).

  Please help an old lady, so I can't call my son (he is a PC person and does not include Mac people).

  Thank you very much!

  Can I plug the ethernet cable into my time machine without affecting my WIFI?

  Yes, you can use one of the three <-->LAN ports for this.

  Regarding how specifically set up cameras... with very good luck... another user who has the same camera system could see this post and be able to offer help on how to configure things detailed.

  Other users who have created other camera systems may be able to help as well.  But that's where we need your help.  Do you have a link to the configuration Guide or the Setup Guide for your camera system you could provide?

• Blocking of the internal services of VPN and Proxy

  Hello

  I have some users with Windows 7 and MAC laptops inside my network domestic who is protected by the R7000.

  I'd like know if its possible to block sessions VPN and Proxy, initiated from these internal, to communicate with Internet computers.

  Thank you

  Try VPN Service to block.

• RVL200 - SSL VPN and firewall rules

  Forgive my ignorance, but I have been immersed in the configuration of this device RVL200 to allow Remoting SSL VPN to a customer site, sight unseen.  I have the basics of the VPN set up in config, but now move the firewall rules.  We want to block all internal devices to access the Internet, but I don't want to cripple the remote clients that will be borrowed by blocking their return via the SSL VPN traffic.  This leads to my questions:

  (1) a rule of DENIAL of coverage for all traffic OUTBOUND will prevent the primary function of the VPN (to allow the administration away from machines on the local network)?

  (2) if the answer to #1 is 'Yes', what ports/services do I need to open the side LAN?

  (3) building # 2, configuring authorized outbound rules apply only for VPN clients, rather than all the hosts on LAN?

  (4) as the default INCOMING traffic rule is to REFUSE EVERYTHING, do I have to create a rule to allow the VPN tunnel, or guess that in the configuration of the router?

  Here are some other details:

  • The LAN behind the RVL200 is also isolated LAN in a manufacturing environment
  • All hosts on this network have a static IP address on a single subnet.
  • The RVL200 has been configured with a static, public IP on the WAN/INTERNET side.
  • DHCP has been disabled on the RVL200
  • Authentication to the device will use a local database.
  • There is no such thing as no DNS server on the local network
  • The device upstream of the RVL200 is a modem using PPPoE DSL, and the device has been configured for this setting.
  • Several database of local users accounts were created to facilitate the SSL VPN access.

  I worked with other aspects of it for a long time, but limited experience with VPN and the associated firewall rules and zero with this family of aircraft.  Any help will be greatly appreciated.

  aponikikay, there is no port forwarding necessary to the function of the RVL200 SSL - VPN.

  Topic 1. That is not proven. It shouldn't do. The router should automatically make sure that the SSL - VPN router service is functional and accessible.

  Re 2. No transfer necessary. In addition, never before TCP/UDP port 47 or 50 for VPN functions. The TCP 1723 port is used for PPTP. UDP 500 is used for ISAKMP. You usually also to transmit TCP/UDP 4500 port for IPSec encapsulation.

  Let's not port 47. ERM is an IP protocol that is used for virtual private networks. It is a TCP or UDP protocol. GRE has 47 IP protocol number. It has nothing to do with TCP or UDP port 47. TCP and UDP are completely different protocols of free WILL.

  It goes the same for 50: ESP is the payload for IPSec tunnels. ESP is the Protocol IP 50. It has nothing to do with TCP or UDP port 50.

  'Transfer' of the GRE is configured with PPTP passthrough option.

  'Transfer' of the ESP is configured with IPSec passthrough option.

• Connect to VPN and then log on to the domain by using different credentials.

  I have a laptop user who will take care of various remote sites.

  In XP, you had to first use DUN/VPN and then you can log in the field with different credentials that the VPN end point.

  With Vista if I use the method user to switch on the logon screen and the log in the VPN it also attempts to use these credentials for the domain.  The VPN device has its own separate authentication of the AD.  How to restore the loss of functionality that Vista has?

  I have to first connect to the VPN appliance and authenticate to that I do the network connection.  Then, I need vista to propose real logon to the computer or to the domain.

  I appreciate the help.

  Computers in discontinuous bench

  Hi StapleBench,

  The question you have posted is related to the VPN and domain environment is better suited in the TECHNET forums, and as I see that you already post your query in the TECHNET forum in the following link:

  http://social.technet.Microsoft.com/forums/en-us/itprovistanetworking/thread/f8579344-07f1-4855-8599-e55a0430c5f8

  I suggest you wait for a response on the TECHNET itself thread.

  Halima S - Microsoft technical support.

  Visit our Microsoft answers feedback Forum and let us know what you think.

• site2site distance-VPN and access-PIX - no way?

  I have,

  I have a problem wrt site2site & VPN remote access on a PIX:

  My setup is as follows: PIX (6.3) puts an end to two a site2-site VPN and also should the remote access service clients using the client VPN Cisco (4.0.x).

  The problem is with remote access VPN clients, obtain an IP address on their VPN interface, but customers cannot reach anything. (Please note that the site2site VPN runs without problem)

  To be precise (see config-excerpts below):

  The customer, who has 212.138.109.20 as its IP address gets an IP 10.0.100.1 on his card-VPN which comes from the "vpnpool of the pool.

  configured on the PIX. This customer relationships to reach servers on interface 'inside' of the PIX as 10.0.1.28.

  However, the client cannot achieve * nothing *-a server on the inside or anything like that (e.g. Internet) outside!

  Using Ethereal traces, I discovered that the packets arrive inside interface coming 10.0.100.1 (IP address of the)

  VPN - client). I also see the response from the server (10.0.1.28) to 10.0.100.1. However for some reason any package does not thanks to

  the PIX to the customer. PIX-newspapers also show packets to and from the VPN client to the inside interface - and * no. * drops. So to my knowledge the packets from server to the VPN client really should be done through the PIX.

  I have attached the following as separate files:

  (o) the parts of the PIX config

  (o) packets showing PIX-log between the VPN client and the server (s) on the interface inside

  (o) ethereal-trace done inside the watch interface also packets between VPN client and server (s)

  I have really scratched my head for a while on this one, tested a lot of things, but I really don't know what could be a problem with my

  config.

  After all, it really should be possible to run site2site - and on the same PIX VPN remote access, shouldn't it?

  Thank you very much in advance for your help,.

  -ewald

  I think that your problem is in your ACL and your crypto card:

  access-list 101 permit ip 10.0.1.0 255.255.255.0 10.0.2.0 255.255.255.0

  access-list 101 permit ip 10.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 10.0.2.0 255.255.255.0

  access-list 101 permit ip 10.0.3.0 255.255.255.0 10.0.2.0 255.255.255.0

  access-list 101 permit ip 10.0.1.0 255.255.255.0 10.0.100.0 255.255.255.0

  correspondence address 1 card crypto loc2rem 101

  This means that this map correspond to these addresses. But your dynamic map is one that must match 10.0.100.0, 10.0.1.0 traffic because your pool local ip is 10.0.100.x. I think what is happening is that the return traffic from the lan to vpn clients trying to get out of the static tunnel, which probably does not exist (for the netblocks - you probably have a security association for each pair of netblocks, but not for vpn clients) and so do not.

  I would recommend adding these lines:

  access-list 105 allow ip 10.0.1.0 255.255.255.0 10.0.2.0 255.255.255.0

  access-list 105 allow ip 10.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 10.0.2.0 255.255.255.0

  access-list 105 permit 10.0.3.0 ip 255.255.255.0 10.0.2.0 255.255.255.0

  no correspondence address 1 card crypto loc2rem 101

  correspondence address 1 card crypto loc2rem 105

  Then reapply:

  loc2rem interface card crypto outside

• Question of VPNS and router

  Hello

  I currently have a RV042G in my company.  It works fine, but I was looking for a solution that would allow me to use VPN so that I can tunnel inside and then again connect to the internet via the tunnel.  I want to have a way secure to connect to internet from my laptop while I am travelling and prefer to build my own VPN and do it myself.

  If I understand correctly, the RV042G does not allow this and it only access to the local network via the tunnel. What would be the next router allowing him to fill this purpose?

  Thank you!

  Hi rodman

  These devices work fine, you can also use third-party software not only software from Cisco to use the VPN features. On subscriptions, IAPH supports more special features such link Protect and IP addresses and you can have and buy a subscription in order to add these features to your device, however, if Don t you want what they you don t have to buy.

  Cisco provide one of the best support, it has plenty of support, it is possible via chat, email or telephone, it also provide assistance free of charge for the users of this forum if you don t buy a warranty

  I hope you find this answer useful,

  * Please answer question mark or note the fact other users can benefit from the TI *.

  Greetings,

  Johnnatan Rodriguez Miranda.

  Support of Cisco network engineer.

• AnyConnect VPN and LAN access

  When remote users to connect to the Cisco ASA VPN and authenticate with Cisco AnyConnect client, they then full access to the environment internal of LAN of business as if they were sitting at their desks in the Office of the Corporation.

  Right?

  After that the remote client authenticates to the AnyConnect VPN, it is sensible to then run remote users of traffic through the corporate firewall (outside to inside) before allowing LAN access full corporate?

  Remote_User - vpn - ANYCONNECT-(outside) (inside) firewall - CORP_LAN

  Thank you

  Frank

  Hello

  Yes, by default, all traffic will be sent through the tunnel.

  If there are users VPN shouldn't be able to reach the resources, you need to establish rules for access to it. The best way to do this is by using VPN filter.

• Mac, VM XP Pro, Cisco VPN and printing.

  I have an end-user running a Mac with a virtual XP Pro Machine that connects to our VPN corperate machine. This part works fine. Problems happen when he tries to print to a network printer. The job is just until it disconnects from the VPN and then it prints very well. No one knows what to do to fix this? I have little or no knowledge of MAC.

  Kind regards

  Dan

  This could be the reason why printing does not work. To print traffic really vpn tunnel as split tunnel is not configured.

• AnyConnect vpn and a tunnel vpn Firewall even outside of the interface.

  I have a (no connection) remote access vpn and ipsec tunnel connection to return to our supplier is on the same firewall outside interface.

  The problem is when users remote vpn in they are not able to ping or join the provider above the tunnel network.

  now, I understand that this is a Bobby pin hair or u turn due to traffic but I'm still not able to understand how the remote vpn users can reach the network of the provider on the tunnel that ends on the same interface where remote access vpn is also configured.

  The firewall is asa 5510 worm 9.1

  Any suggestions please.

  Hello

  You are on the right track. Turning U will be required to allow vpn clients access to resources in the L2L VPN tunnel.

  The essence is that the split tunneling to access list must include subnets of the remote VPN to peer once the user connects they have directions pertaining to remote resources on anyconnect VPN

  Please go through this post and it will guide you how to set up the u turn on the SAA.
  https://supportforums.Cisco.com/document/52701/u-turninghairpinning-ASA

  http://www.Cisco.com/c/en/us/support/docs/security/ASA-5500-x-series-next-generation-firewalls/100918-ASA-sslvpn-00.html

  Kind regards
  Dinesh Moudgil

  PS Please rate helpful messages.

• ASA 8.4 (1) source-nat over vpn site-to-site

  I'm setting up a tunnel vpn site-to-site and require nat for the local and remote side. The remote side will be nat to

  10.2.255.128/25 on their face before they reach our network, so I have to only source-nat our servers via the tunnel to them. Should I just do the static NAT, then let the whole subnet through the acl of valuable traffic as the config below? I don't think I should use twice a nat because I'm not trying to make the destination nat on the firewall. Servers with us will 10.2.255.128/25 and I would like to preserve it through the ASA.

  network of the ServerA object

  host 10.1.0.1

  NAT 10.2.255.1 static (inside, outside)

  network of the object server b

  host 10.1.0.2

  NAT 10.2.255.2 static (inside, outside)

  the object server c network

  host 10.1.0.3

  NAT 10.2.255.3 static (inside, outside)

  the LOCAL_SUBNET object-group network

  object-network 10.2.255.0 255.255.255.128

  the REMOTE_SUBNET object-group network

  object-network 10.2.255.128 255.255.255.128

  VPN_ACL list extended access permitted ip object-group LOCAL_SUBNET-group of objects REMOTE_SUBNET

  Thank you

  Your configuration is correct, but I have a few comments.  Remember that NAT occurs before the delivery of your servers will be translated into 10.2.255.2 and 10.2.255.3 and then sent through the tunnel, so your encryption field is correct.

  Is your internet firewall as well? What your servers out of the internet?  They will be translated to 10.2.255.2 and 10.2.255.3 and who will fail in internet routing is.  If these servers access the internet through the firewall, I would recommend a configuration like this for each of your servers:

  network of the ServerA_NAT object

  Home 10.2.255.1

  NAT static ServerA ServerA_NAT destination (indoor, outdoor) static source REMOTE_SUBNET REMOTE_SUBNET

  This will use destination basic NAT for traffic VPN and NAT everything to a public IP address for the internet traffic.  Of course, if this is not your internet connection firewall can do abstraction.